Referral of the inquiry
On 5 March 2014, the Senate referred the following matter to the
Environment and Communications References Committee (the committee) for inquiry
and report by 16 June 2014:
- The history, appropriateness
and effectiveness of the use of environmental offsets in federal environmental
approvals in Australia, including:
the principles that underpin the use of offsets;
the processes used to develop and assess proposed offsets;
the adequacy of monitoring and evaluation of approved offsets
arrangements to determine whether promised environmental outcomes are achieved
over the short and long term; and
any other related matters.
- That in conducting the
inquiry the committee consider the terms of reference in (1) with specific
regard to, but not restricted to, the following projects:
Whitehaven Coal's Maules Creek Project;
Waratah Coal's Galilee Coal Project;
QGC's Queensland Curtis LNH Project;
North Queensland Bulk Ports' Abbot Point Coal Terminal Capital Dredging
Jandakot Airport developments.
The reporting date was subsequently extended to 25 June 2014.
Conduct of the inquiry
The committee advertised the inquiry on its website and in The
Australian newspaper. The committee also wrote to relevant organisations and
individuals inviting submissions by 4 April 2014. The committee received 95
submissions, which were published on the committee's website and are listed at
The committee held public hearings relating to its inquiry in Sydney on
5 May 2014, Canberra on 6 May 2014, Brisbane on 7 May 2014 and
Canberra on 18 June 2014. A list of witnesses who appeared at the hearings
may be found at Appendix 2.
The committee would like to thank all the organisations, individuals and
government departments that contributed to the inquiry.
Notes on references
Hansard references in this report are to the proof committee Hansard.
Page numbers may vary between the proof and the official Hansard transcript.
The committee notes that the Environmental Defenders Office (Victoria)
changed its name to Environmental Justice Australia during the course of the
inquiry. As such, the submission is referenced as being from the Environmental
Defenders Office (Victoria) (submission 72), and the hearing appearance by Mr
Brendan Sydes is referenced as being from Environmental Justice Australia. The
committee also received a separate submission from the Australian Network of
Environmental Defender's Offices (ANEDO – submission 60).
Structure of the report
This chapter outlines the conduct of the inquiry. Chapter 2 provides an
introduction and background in relation to environmental offsets, in particular
the legal and policy framework relating to offsets, primarily at the
Commonwealth level, as well as consideration of relevant past reviews and
Chapter 3 outlines the overall levels of support for, and opposition to,
environmental offsets, followed by a discussion of some of the key principles
underpinning the use of offsets under the Environment Protection and
Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) (EPBC Act).
Chapter 4 considers some key issues relating to the processes for the
development and assessment of offsets such as timing, transparency, methods for
assessing and calculating offsets, as well as the need for more strategic and
consistent approaches to environmental offsets.
Chapter 5 examines the adequacy of monitoring, enforcement and
evaluation of environmental offsets, with a focus on offsets issued as
conditions of approval under the EPBC Act.
Chapter 6 draws together the committee's conclusions and recommendations
in relation to environmental offsets.
The five projects identified in the inquiry's term of reference (2) are
outlined in appendices 3–7.
Where appropriate, these case studies are identified as examples in the
discussion of relevant issues in relation to offsets discussed in chapters 3–5.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page