Chapter 1
Introduction
The referral
1.1
On 17 July 2014, the Customs Amendment Bill 2014 (the Bill)
was introduced into the House of Representatives by the Minister for
Immigration and Border Protection, the Hon Scott Morrison MP.[1]
On 28 August 2014, pursuant to a recommendation of the Selection of Bills
Committee, the Senate referred the provisions of the Bill to the Legal and
Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee (the committee) for inquiry
and report by 30 September 2014.[2]
Overview of the Bill
1.2
The Explanatory Memorandum (EM) outlines six 'technical amendments'
that the Bill would make to the Customs Act 1901 (the Act), namely to:
-
allow class based authorisations to include future offices or
positions that come into existence after the authorisation is given;
-
extend Customs controls to those places at which ships and
aircraft arrive in Australia in accordance with section 58 of the Act;
-
provide greater flexibility in relation to the reporting of the
arrival of ships and aircraft in Australia and reporting of stores and
prohibited goods on such ships and aircraft;
-
improve the application processes for several permissions under
the Act. These amendments will also support initiatives to enable online
applications for these permissions;
-
extend Customs powers of examination to the baggage of domestic
passengers on international flights and voyages, and to domestic cargo that is
carried on an international flight or voyage; and
-
enhance the interaction of the infringement notice scheme with
the claims process under the Act in relation to prohibited imports.[3]
1.3
The manner in which these technical amendments are to be brought about
is explored in the next chapter.
1.4
The EM describes the Bill as having no financial impact.[4]
Other parliamentary committees
1.5
The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights has examined the Bill
and concluded that it 'is compatible with human rights'.[5]
1.6
The Senate Standing Committee for the Scrutiny of Bills also examined
the Bill. The only comment it had to make was in relation to the strict
liability offence created by proposed subsection 129; it considered that
'[t]he imposition of strict liability for this offence appears to be consistent
with [that] committee’s established principles'.[6]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.7
As per the usual practice, the committee advertised the inquiry on its
website and wrote to a number of stakeholders inviting submissions by
8 September 2014. Details of the inquiry were also placed on the committee's
website (https://www.aph.gov.au/senate_legalcon).
1.8
The committee received one submission, from the Australian Customs and
Border Protection Service (Customs),[7]
which has been published on the committee's website.
1.9
The committee decided not to hold a public hearing.
Acknowledgement
1.10
The committee thanks the Australian Customs and Border Protection
Service for the assistance that it provided to the inquiry.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page