Footnotes

Footnotes

CHAPTER 1 - Background

[1]        Explanatory memorandum, p.v.

[2]        Explanatory memorandum, p.v.

[3]        Explanatory memorandum, p.v.

[4]        Explanatory memorandum, p.vi.

[5]        Explanatory memorandum, p.vi.

[6]        Explanatory memorandum, p.vi.

[7]        Explanatory memorandum, p.v.

[8]        Explanatory memorandum, p.v.

[9]        Explanatory memorandum, p.i.

[10]      Explanatory memorandum, pp. vi-ix.

CHAPTER 2

[1]        [2014] FCAFC 182.

[2]        Aucote and Samson Maritime Pty Ltd [2004] AATA 296.

[3]        Department of Employment, answer to question on notice, 18 March 2015.

[4]        Australian Maritime Union, Submission 1.

[5]        Department of Employment, Submission 4, p. 6.

[6]        Department of Employment, answer to question on notice, 18 March 2015.

[7]        Department of Employment, answer to question on notice, 18 March 2015.

[8]        Explanatory memorandum, p. viii.

[9]        Explanatory memorandum, p. viii.

[10]       Explanatory memorandum, p. 2.

[11]       Australian Maritime Union, Submission 1.

[12]       The MUA, for example, cites Western Australia as having especially poor workers compensation scheme.

[13]       Department of Employment, answer to question on notice, 18 March 2015.

[14]       Department of Employment, Submission 4, p. 3.

LABOR SENATORS’ DISSENTING REPORT

[1] Maritime Union of Australia, Submission 1, p. 8.

[2] Australian Maritime Officers Union, Submission 2, p. 2.

[3] Australian Maritime Officers Union, Submission 2, p. 3.

[4] KCI Lawyers, Submission 5, p. 3.

[5] Maritime Union of Australia, Submission 1, p. 15.

[6] KCI Lawyers, Submission 5, p. 3.

AUSTRALIAN GREENS DISSENTING REPORT

[1] Maritime Union of Australia, Submission 1, p. 2.

[2] AIMPE Submission p.5

[3] Maritime Union of Australia, Submission 1, p. 3.