was appropriated for only four years when the GST was
introduced, and was due to lapse after 30 June 2004. Although there was no
formal agreement between the Government and the book industry to extend the
scheme beyond this date, until 2003 the Department of Education, Science and
Training (DEST) had included forward estimates for the scheme for 2005 and 2006
in the Budget.
Approximately
70 percent of the scheme's allocation related to higher education (universities
and TAFEs). Importantly, the ETSS maintained access to textbooks for students,
and, therefore, access to education and knowledge.
In June 2003, when
it became clear the Government was not intending to continue the ETSS, I
introduced a Private Member’s Bill in June to extend the ETSS beyond June
2004. Support for the Bill was received from the Australian
Vice-Chancellors’ Committee, National Tertiary Education Union, National Union
of Students, Council of Australian Postgraduate Associations, Australian
Publishers’ Association, Australian Booksellers’ Association, Australian Campus
Booksellers’ Association, Australian Society of Authors, and the Australian
Medical Students’ Association, among others.
A petition launched
in March 2004, by the Democrats, to save the scheme received more than 35,000
signatures. Thousands of the Democrats’ 'Save Our Subsidy' postcards and
stickers were distributed around the country as part of a broader campaign to
oppose the abolition of the scheme.
In June 2004, the
Democrats' introduced a motion calling on the Government to extend the Scheme
which was complemented in the House of Representatives, by Tony Windsor MP. The
Senate motion was defeated when Labor voted with Government, opposing the
Democrats motion.
The ETSS cost around
$25 million per year and, according to evidence provided to this inquiry, was a
significant student income support measure. The benefits of the ETSS are
well known, as is the cost of the scheme, and the Democrats believe the scheme
should be restored.
The impact of the
Government's so-called "Voluntary Student Unionism" policy is likely
to have a severe effect on student income support measures currently provided
by student organisations all over the country. While it was not part of
the terms of reference for the inquiry, the likely impact of the changes
resulted in many witnesses expressing their concerns to the committee.
The Democrats
believe ample evidence was provided to the inquiry to conclude that the
Government's Higher Education Support Amendment (Abolition of Compulsory
Up-front Student Union Fees) Bill 2005 should be opposed by the Senate.
Recommendations
The Democrats'
recommendations to the Hacking Australia's Future: Threats
to institutional autonomy, academic freedom and student choice in
Australian higher education inquiry, by
the Senate's Education, Workplace Relations and Education References Committee
in November 2003, included the following recommendations on student income
support measures. These recommendations (numbers 1 to 6) are supported by
the evidence presented to this inquiry and are still relevant.
Recommendations 7 to
12 are other recommendations supported by the evidence presented to this
inquiry.
Recommendation 1
That the age of
independence for all student income support payments be lowered to 18.
Recommendation 2
That all forms of
student income support be raised to parity with the age pension over a 5 year
period.
Recommendation 3
That all Commonwealth
education related scholarships be tax free, regardless of the student's study
mode.
Recommendation 4
That the Government
reverses its decision to increase visa application fees by $85.
Recommendation 5
The lack of thorough
and consistent research on educational outcomes by the Commonwealth that can be
compared with previous data has made critical analysis, of previous and future
changes to the sector, difficult. That the Commonwealth conduct research into
the effectiveness and broader social and economic impact of its higher
education policies using established benchmarks that will allow historical
comparisons of data.
Recommendation 6
That the number of
Commonwealth scholarships for equity groups be increased.
Recommendation 7
That the Government restore
the Educational Textbook Subsidy Scheme.
Recommendation 8
That the personal
income test for students be abolished.
Recommendation 9
That the Higher
Education Support Amendment (Abolition of Compulsory Up-front Student Union
Fees) Bill 2005 be opposed by the Senate.
Recommendation 10
That the method of
indexation for student income support payments be made consistent with the
indexation of the pension.
Recommendation 11
That
university-administered scholarships are exempt from the social security personal
income test.
Recommendation 12
That Centrelink
employ Indigenous staff to deal specifically with Indigenous students.
Recommendation 13
That Section 3.20.15
of the Guidelines for Commonwealth Scholarships be amended such that the
duration of a full-time APA is four years (eight years part-time) for a
student undertaking Research Doctorate studies.
Recommendation 14
That Rent Assistance
be made available to ABSTUDY Masters and Doctorate students.
Recommendation 15
That Indigenous
education be made a National Priority area, and thus exempt from the HECS
increases allowed under backing Australia's Future.
Senator Natasha
Stott Despoja
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page