Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1
On 21 March 2013, on the recommendation of the Senate Selection of Bills
Committee, the Senate referred the Health Insurance Amendment (Medicare Funding for
Certain Types of Abortion) Bill 2013 (the Bill) to the Senate Finance and Public
Administration Legislation Committee for inquiry and report by 25 June 2013.[1]
The reasons for referral were for the committee to consider:
- The unacceptability to Australians of the use of
Medicare funding for the purpose of gender selection abortions;
- The prevalence of gender selection – with
preference for a male child – amongst some ethnic groups present in Australia
and the recourse to Medicare funded abortions to terminate female children;
- The use of Medicare funded gender selection
abortions for the purpose of 'family-balancing';
- Support for campaigns by United Nations agencies to
end the discriminatory practice of gender selection through implementing
disincentives for gender-selection abortions'; and
- Concern from medical associations in first world
countries about the practice of gender-selection abortion, viz. Canada, USA, UK.[2]
Conduct of the inquiry
1.2
The committee acknowledges that there is a wider debate within the
Australian community about abortion. Notwithstanding this debate, the committee
has confined its deliberations to the evidence provided about the Bill. In
addition, the committee has not made a recommendation in relation to the Bill;
the committee has undertaken its inquiry into the Bill in order to provide
information for senators on the arguments received about the proposed amendment
to Medicare funding.
1.3
The committee invited submissions from interested organisations and
individuals, and government bodies. The inquiry was also advertised on the
committee's website and in the Australian newspaper.
1.4
The committee received 919 submissions and 239 form letters. A list of
individuals and organisations which made public submissions to the inquiry is
at Appendix 1. Submissions may be accessed through the committee's website at www.aph.gov.au/senate_fpa. The committee thanks those organisations and the
large number of individuals who made submissions.
Overview and provisions of the Bill
1.5
The Bill is a private Senator's bill that seeks to remove Medicare funding for abortions procured on the basis of
gender.[3]
1.6
Schedule 1 of the Bill proposes to amend the Health Insurance Act
1973 by inserting proposed new section 17A. Proposed new subsection 17A(1)
provides that a Medicare benefit is not payable if:
- a medical practitioner performs a medically induced termination
on a pregnant woman, or provides a service that relates to or is connected with
performing such a medically induced termination (proposed new paragraph
17A(1)(a)); and
- the termination is carried out solely because of the gender of
the foetus (proposed new paragraph 17A(1)(b)).[4]
1.7
The Explanatory Memorandum (EM) suggests that the Bill would have
limited financial impacts. The EM also states that the Bill is compatible with
the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international
instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny)
Act 2011.[5]
Background provided in the Explanatory Memorandum
1.8
The United Nations (UN) has drawn attention to the practice of gender
selective abortion. It is noted in the EM that the 1994 Cairo Population
Conference identified that gender selective abortions occur in countries such
as China, India, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taiwan, South Korea, Bangladesh,
Azerbaijan, and Armenia. At the Cairo Conference a range of commitments were
made to 'take the necessary measures to prevent infanticide, prenatal sex
selection, trafficking in girl children'.
The EM also notes that the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) has urged governments to
fulfil the commitments made.[6]
1.9
In 2011, an interagency statement entitled 'Preventing gender-biased sex
selection' was issued by UN agencies and the World Health Organisation (WHO). The
statement:
...reaffirms the commitment of United Nations agencies to
encourage and support efforts by States, international and national
organizations, civil society and communities to uphold the rights of girls and
women and to address the multiple manifestations of gender discrimination
including the problem of imbalanced sex ratios caused by sex selection. It thus
seeks to highlight the public health and human rights dimensions and
implications of the problem and to provide recommendations on how best to take
effective action.[7]
1.10
The EM notes that determining the sex of a foetus may be necessary in
the pre-natal diagnosing of certain gender specific disorders. If such a
disorder is diagnosed, a decision may be taken to terminate the pregnancy
rather than continue the pregnancy which may result in a child with a
debilitating disorder. The EM goes on to state that:
The policy intent of this Bill is to provide that a
termination of a pregnancy on the grounds of a gender specific disorder, and
not solely for reasons of sex selection, would not fall within the ambit of
this Bill.[8]
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page