Labor Senators reject the views and recommendation of the committee in
Labor Senators know that this bill has nothing to do with addressing the
gender pay gap and everything to do with the fact that Pauline Hanson and
Malcolm Turnbull are intent on undermining the ABC and SBS.
No one is fooled that this bill has anything to do with addressing the
gender pay gap or improving transparency in public funding. This bill is
designed to menace and harass the national broadcasters to satisfy the whims
and demands of Pauline Hanson.
Labor Senators note that there is no real problem with salaries
disclosure at the ABC or SBS. The only problem this bill solves is the one
Malcolm Turnbull faced last year – when he could not get his media law changes
through Parliament without Pauline Hanson’s support.
The Turnbull Government could not get its plan to scrap the 2 out of 3
cross-media control rule through on merit last year, despite 18 months of
trying, because it was contrary to the public interest. This desperate and
chaotic government then resorted to dragging the ABC and SBS into a quagmire of
deal-making in order to push their plan to undermine media diversity through
Labor Senators note that this bill was introduced further to a backroom
deal between the Turnbull Government and One Nation in exchange for Pauline
Hanson’s support for the repeal of the 2 out of 3 cross-media control rule,
which Labor opposed. The Turnbull Government used the ABC and SBS as bargaining
chips in exchange for support for the Broadcasting Legislation Amendment
(Broadcasting Reform) Bill 2017 which made final passage through the House of
Representatives on 16 October 2017.
All up, Malcolm Turnbull and Pauline Hanson have teamed up to launch an
unprecedented attack on the ABC and SBS this year. They have lined up no less
than three bills, an insidious and destructive ‘competitive neutrality inquiry’
and the threat of budget cuts in 2018.
Labor Senators note that the bill is politically motivated and furthers
One Nation’s vendetta against the national broadcasters, particularly
because Pauline Hanson did not like being scrutinised in a Four Corners
episode, last year. We note the changes proposed by this bill are not in the
public interest; they are in Pauline Hanson’s complete self-interest.
Labor Senators believe it is important to note the context which led to
the introduction of this bill into Parliament, last year.
In April 2017, the ABC Four Corners program aired an investigative story
into One Nation called ‘Please Explain’ and ABC News subsequently published
leaked recordings of conversations between Pauline Hanson on the donation of a
light aircraft, among other things.
In May 2017, One Nation complained of bias at the ABC and threatened to
refuse to support the Federal Budget unless the ABC’s funding was cut by $600
million over four years.
In August 2017, the Turnbull Government announced a deal with One Nation
on the media ownership changes, inclusive of a number of unnecessary and
unwarranted amendments to the ABC Act and SBS Act as well as an insidious
‘competitive neutrality inquiry’ aimed at reducing the role of the ABC and SBS
towards that of market failure broadcasters. In a subsequent press conference,
Pauline Hanson also made it clear that she will be speaking to the
Treasurer and going after the ABC’s budget in 2018.
Labor Senators note that the intent of the competitive neutrality
inquiry, still yet to get underway, is completely at odds with the Liberal
Government’s two recent attempts to change the legislation of the SBS to permit
greater flexibility in SBS advertising, in direct competition with commercial
television, commercial radio and subscription television broadcasters. The
hypocritical and confused Turnbull Government does not know what it stands
for from one month to the next.
Labor Senators note the remarks of ABC Managing Director, Michelle Guthrie,
in her speech at the ABC Friends Public Conference Dinner in October 2017:
The ABC’s role in the media law reform debate was supposed to
be as an interested bystander. We had no skin in the game. Or so we thought. We
now find ourselves very much impacted by the deal-making and with a real need
to ensure that the public interest – as opposed to vested interest – is
Ms Guthrie further stated that:
The ABC Act and Charter should not be tampered with simply to
suit political or commercial agendas...Legislation designed to further a
political vendetta by one party uncomfortable with being scrutinised by our
investigative programs is not good policy-making. Neither is using the ABC Act
as a bargaining chip in industry machinations that have nothing to do with the
Labor Senators believe the ABC and SBS are two of Australia’s most important
public institutions and regard the bill to be an unwarranted, onerous and
counter-productive incursion on their independence.
Labor Senators oppose the bill because the ABC and SBS already disclose
information about salaries appropriately – a fact that both the Explanatory
Memorandum to this bill and this committee acknowledge. In other words, this
bill is pointless and does more harm than good.
Labor Senators note this bill could impinge on the right to privacy of
We note that in its Scrutiny Digest No. 1 of 2018, the Scrutiny of Bills
Committee expressed concern that publishing the names and remuneration details
of ABC and SBS employees and contractors receiving more than $200,000 would
impact on the right to privacy of such persons and may unduly trespass on
personal rights and liberties.
Further, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights also
expressed its concern over 'whether the public disclosure of the names and
remuneration of employees and on-air talent' was proportionate to the
legitimate objectives of the bill.
Labor Senators oppose the bill because it would require the national
broadcasters to provide greater transparency on salaries than other publicly
funded bodies and their private sector competitors, for no justifiable reason.
Further, we note that the ABC and SBS already provide detailed tables showing
remuneration paid to employees in bands over $200,000. Those tables are
consistent with the guidelines set for the public service.
Labor Senators note that gender pay equity analysis identifies no
like-for-like pay gap unfavourable to women at any level in the ABC. As ABC
Managing Director Michelle Guthrie said in her opening remarks at Senate
Estimates last October:
The BBC's top executive is male and its top presenter is also
male. That presenter earns £2.3 million a year—A$3.7 million. Our highest paid
talent earns roughly one-eighth of that figure and is a woman. I'm the
highest-paid person at the ABC, under a salary set by the Remuneration
Tribunal. We lead the way on gender representation: five of our nine board
members are female, 49 per cent of our senior executive is female and 51 per
cent of the general workforce is female. This is also the case in relation to
pay. There is no pay gap unfavourable to women at any level in the ABC. We have
parity across our executive and our senior on-air talent.
SBS submitted that SBS has 'a positive record in terms of gender
representation', with 57 per cent of its Senior Leadership Group being female.
Labor Senators do not support a bill that achieves nothing of policy
value and that permits the Turnbull Government to use the ABC and SBS as
political bargaining chips, that forms part of a concerted effort by One Nation
to attack the ABC and SBS and which is an unjustified incursion on the
independence of the national broadcasters.
Urquhart Senator Anthony
Tasmania Senator for
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page