ADDITIONAL COMMENTS BY SENATOR NICK XENOPHON
1.1
Any consideration of the Water Act 2007 needs to take into
account the following issues:
-
the importance of the Murray-Darling Basin as playing a key role
in Australia's food supply, and the importance of having a healthy river system
to sustain this;
-
the variability of the climate in the Murray-Darling Basin, and
the resulting highly variable water flows in the Basin;
-
the future effects of climate change on the environment of the
Basin, as predicted by the CSIRO; and
-
the power of the states, and the power of the Murray-Darling
Basin Authority (MDBA) to enforce the proposed Basin Plan.
1.2
In addition, I draw attention to the issue of 'early adopters'; that is,
irrigators and farmers in the Basin who have already taken steps to implement
water saving technologies. Many of these early adopters are based in South
Australia, where irrigators in the Riverland have spent many millions of
dollars of their own money to implement water saving technologies since the late
1960s. This means that they are now generally not able to access the Water for
the Future scheme, of which irrigators upstream are now taking advantage. In
essence, irrigators and farmers who took steps to become more efficient early
on are now at a distinct disadvantage.
1.3
Further, this is particularly important in the context of the MDBA's
Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan, in which the MDBA outlines the dollar value
per hectare of irrigated product in each area of the Basin (table reproduced overleaf).[1]
1.4
It is critical in considering a Basin Plan that the relative
efficiencies of each area are taken into account when allocating resources. Low
efficiency areas must have an onus placed on them to improve, while credit
needs to be given to early adopters in more efficient areas.
1.5
In addition and critically, the MDBA's Guide to the Proposed Basin Plan
also emphasises the importance of an open Murray Mouth to the health of the
Basin as a whole.[2]
It states:
...an open mouth is essential to the environmental health of
the Basin for a range of reasons including:
-
export of salt and nutrients from the Basin — without salt export land
will salinise and water quality will deteriorate with negative effects on both
the environment and consumptive use for all irrigation and human water needs
throughout the Basin
- a healthy Coorong — tidal exchange between the Southern Ocean and the
Coorong is important in maintaining water quality in the Coorong (particularly
the southern Coorong) and in maintaining water levels that inundate mudflats,
which are important habitat for a range of plant and animal species
-
assist with maintaining a range of healthy estuarine, marine and
hypersaline conditions in the Coorong, including healthy populations of 'keystone'
species such as tuberous tassel in the South Lagoon and widgeon grass in the
North Lagoon
-
migration of diadromous fish species (fish that require access to both
fresh and saline water to complete their life cycle) — seven such species,
including common galaxias and estuary perch, require this connectivity.[3]
1.6
It is vital that this aim continues to be a priority in considering a
Plan for the Basin, because if the river system is not healthy, not only are
the ecosystems of the river at risk, but also the viability of agriculture in
the Basin.
Senator Nick
Xenophon
Independent Senator for South
Australia
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page