Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Trade Support Loans Bill 2014Trade Support Loans (Consequential
Amendments) Bill 2014
Portfolio:
Industry
Introduced:
House of Representatives, 4 June 2014
Purpose
1.1
The Trade Support Loans Bill 2014 and Trade Support Loans (Consequential
Amendments) Bill 2014 (the bill) seeks to establish the Trade Support Loans Program
to provide concessional, income-contingent loans of up to $20 000 over four
years to certain apprentices. The loans will be repayable when the individual's
income reaches the Higher Education Loan Program repayment threshold.
Committee view on compatibility
Right to education
1.2
The right to education is guaranteed by article 13 of the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), under which States
parties recognise the right of everyone to education, and agree that education
shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and sense of
dignity, and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental
freedoms.
1.3
Under article 2(1) of ICESCR, Australia has certain obligations in
relation to the right to social security. These include:
-
the immediate obligation to satisfy certain minimum aspects of
the right;
-
the obligation not to unjustifiably take any backwards steps that
might affect the right;
-
the obligation to ensure the right is made available in a
non-discriminatory way; and
-
the obligation to take reasonable measures within its available
resources to progressively secure broader enjoyment of the right.
1.4
Under article 4 of the ICESCR, economic, social and cultural rights may
be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law and compatible
with the nature of those rights, and solely for the purpose of promoting the
general welfare in a democratic society. Such limitations must be proportionate
to the achievement of a legitimate objective, and must be the least restrictive
alternative where several types of limitations are available.
Support for apprentices through the
institution of concessional income contingent loan scheme
1.5
As outlined above, the proposed legislation introduces a voluntary loan
scheme for concessional, income-contingent loans of up to $20 000 over four
years to certain apprentices. The statement of compatibility for the bill notes
that the bill engages and promotes the right to education. It states:
[The bill] will promote an individual’s right to education by
providing access to financial assistance, under the loans, during an
apprenticeship. The loans are designed to help apprentices with the everyday
living expenses associated with training (technical and vocational education).
This will improve the accessibility of technical and vocational education, as
individuals need not miss out on enrolment due to the prospect of financial
difficulties in undertaking an apprenticeship. The Bills will therefore expand
the accessibility of technical and vocational education.[1]
1.6
However, the committee notes that the trade support loan scheme is
intended to supersede the 'Tools for Your Trade Program' (which was to cease
from 1 July 2014) as a form of financial support for apprentices.[2]
1.7
Where a bill seeks to repeal or replace existing arrangements, the
committee's usual expectation is that the statement of compatibility provide an
assessment of whether the repeal or replacement of those arrangements may limit
or remove human rights protections, and whether remaining or proposed
arrangements in place of the repealed or replaced measures may offer equivalent
or greater protection of human rights.[3]
1.8
The committee notes that the statement of compatibility does not provide
a human rights assessment of the proposed scheme with reference to any programs
or measures, such as the 'Tools for Trade Program', which it is intended to
replace.
1.9
The committee therefore seeks the advice of the Minister for Industry
as to the compatibility of the bill with the right to education.
Rights
to equality and non-discrimination
1.10
The rights to equality and non-discrimination are guaranteed by articles
2, 16 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR).These are fundamental human rights that are essential to the protection
and respect of all human rights. They provide that everyone is entitled to
enjoy their rights without discrimination of any kind, and that all people are
equal before the law and entitled without discrimination to the equal and
non-discriminatory protection of the law.
1.11
For human rights purposes, 'discrimination' is impermissible
differential treatment among persons or groups that result in a person or a
group being treated less favourably than others, based on one of the prohibited
grounds for discrimination.[4]
1.12
Discrimination may be either direct or indirect. Indirect discrimination
may occur when a requirement or condition is neutral on its face but has a
disproportionate or unintended negative impact on particular groups. Articles
2, 3, 4 and 15 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) further describes the content of these
rights, describing the specific elements that States parties are required to
take into account to ensure the rights to equality for women.
Availability of loans to qualifying apprenticeships on the trade
support loans priority list
1.13
The bill provides that, to qualify for a concessional, income-contingent
loan, a person must be undertaking a qualifying apprenticeship in an occupation
or qualification on the Trade Support Loans (TSL) priority list (the list),[5]
which must be established and maintained by the minister.
1.14
The committee notes that the requirement for the minister to specify
particular occupations or qualifications on the list may, in practice, operate
to indirectly discriminate against certain groups. For example, if occupations
or qualifications specified on the list are predominantly those in which
apprentices are traditionally male, this may be regarded as indirectly
discriminating against women, who would have less access to the scheme.
1.15
The committee notes that, while the statement of compatibility
identifies the rights to equality and non-discrimination as being engaged, it
does not provide an assessment of the compatibility of the proposed list with the
rights to equality and non-discrimination.[6]
1.16
The committee therefore seeks the Minister for Industry's advice as
to whether the qualification requirement for the loan through the TSL Priority
List is compatible with the rights to equality and non-discrimination.
Right to privacy
1.17
Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR) prohibits arbitrary or unlawful interferences with an individual's
privacy, family, correspondence or home.
1.18
However, this right may be subject to permissible limitations which are provided
by law and are not arbitrary. In order for limitations not to be arbitrary, they
must seek to achieve a legitimate objective and be reasonable, necessary and proportionate
to achieving that objective.
Powers to obtain certain information
1.19
The bill would provide a number of powers to the Secretary of the
Department of Industry to obtain certain information in connection with a trade
support loan.[7]
1.20
The statement of compatibility for the bill notes that this aspect of
the scheme engages the right to privacy. In concluding that the secretary's
powers to obtain information are compatible with human rights, it states:
Given the importance placed on confidentiality and that loans
are claimed on a voluntary basis, the requirements do not restrict any persons
right to privacy.[8]
1.21
However, the committee notes that, while the statement of compatibility
notes generally that the information collected will be protected by the Privacy
Act 1988, it contains no assessment of whether the limitation is compatible
with the right to privacy.
1.22
The committee's usual expectation where a limitation on a right is
proposed is that the statement of compatibility provide an assessment of
whether the limitation is reasonable, necessary and proportionate to achieving
a legitimate objective.
1.23
The committee notes that information regarding the associated offences provided
for in the bill (discussed below) is particularly relevant to an assessment of
the bill's compatibility with the right to privacy.
1.24
The committee therefore seeks the Minister for Industry's advice as
to whether the powers to obtain certain information are compatible with the
right to privacy and particularly:
-
whether the limitation is aimed at achieving a legitimate
objective;
-
whether there is a rational connection between the limitation
and that objective; and
-
whether the limitation is a reasonable and proportionate
measure for the achievement of that objective.
Right to a fair trial and fair
hearing rights
1.25
The right to a fair trial and fair hearing are contained in article 14
of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The right
applies to both criminal and civil proceedings, to cases before both courts and
tribunals. The right is concerned with procedural fairness, and encompasses
notions of equality in proceedings, the right to a public hearing and the
requirement that hearings are conducted by an independent and impartial body.
1.26
Specific guarantees of the right to a fair trial in the determination of
a criminal charge guaranteed by article 14(1) are set out in article 14(2) to
(7). These include the presumption of innocence and minimum guarantees in
criminal proceedings, which include the right to not to incriminate oneself
(article 14(3)(g)). The ICCPR also provides a guarantee against retrospective
criminal laws and the right not to incriminate oneself (article 14(3)).
Creation of new offences with respect to obtaining
information
1.27
The bill proposes the creation of new offences under proposed sections
63 and 73. Proposed section 63 provides that it is an offence if a person
refuses or fails to comply with a requirement to give information or produce a
document. The penalty for this offence is 12 months’ imprisonment. Proposed
section 73 creates the offence of failing to inform the secretary of a change
of circumstances which may affect the qualification for a Trade Support Loan.
The penalty for this offence is six months’ imprisonment. These provisions
provide for a ‘reasonable excuse’ defence in relation to which the defendant
bears an evidential burden of proof. In order to rely on the defence, the
defendant is required to adduce or point to evidence ‘that suggests a
reasonable possibility that the [reasonable excuse] exists or does not exist’.[9]
1.28
The committee considers that the proposed provisions may engage the
right to be presumed innocent, to the extent that they may be potentially
regarded as creating a reverse burden of proof in the context of the particular
offences. The committee notes that the statement of compatibility for the bill
makes no reference to these provisions.
1.29
The committee's usual expectation where a limitation on a right is
proposed is that the statement of compatibility provides an assessment of
whether the limitation is reasonable, necessary, and proportionate to achieving
a legitimate objective.
1.30
The committee notes that the nature of the offence, the requirement for
the defendant to establish the 'excuse' and the severity of the proposed
penalties may be particularly relevant to an analysis of whether the proposed
measures are compatible with the right to be presumed innocent.
1.31
The committee therefore seeks the advice of the Minister for Industry
as to whether the new offences are compatible the right to a fair trial and
fair hearing rights, and particularly:
-
whether the measures are aimed at achieving a legitimate
objective;
-
whether there is a rational connection between the limitation
and that objective; and
-
whether the limitation is reasonable and proportionate measure
for the achievement of that objective.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page