Statute Stocktake Bill (No. 1) 2011

Bills Digest no. 123 2010–11

This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the Bill.

Diane Spooner
Bills Digest Service
23 May 2011


Passage history
Key provisions
Financial implications

Passage history

Statute Stocktake Bill (No. 1) 2011

Date introduced:  23 March 2011

House:  House of Representatives

Portfolio:  Finance and Deregulation

Commencement:  the day after Royal Assent

Links: The links to the Bill, its Explanatory Memorandum and second reading speech can be found on the Bill's home page. When Bills have been passed and have received Royal Assent, they become Acts, which can be found at the ComLaw website at


The Bill amends legislation across a range of portfolios, by abolishing 39 special appropriations, including a statutory Special Account, repealing redundant provisions in 11 Acts and repealing 25 Acts in their entirety.[1]



On 16 April 2006, Mr Lindsay Tanner, the then Opposition Shadow Minister for Finance, re-released a discussion paper entitled Operation Sunlight which aimed to enhance budget transparency and accountability by certain measures such as tightening the outcomes and outputs framework and improving the readability and usefulness of budget papers.[2]  On 24 March 2008, as Minister for Finance, he then asked Senator Andrew Murray to review Operation Sunlight (the Murray Review) with terms of reference for the review to consider:

  • existing financial reporting arrangements and the reforms announced in Operation Sunlight
  • the recommendations that were made by the Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee in its report Transparency and Accountability of Commonwealth in Public Funding and Expenditure, March 2007, and
  • consistent with the Government’s commitments to reducing unnecessary regulation and red tape, any current arrangements within the financial framework that can be simplified or removed without detriment to appropriate levels of accountability.[3] 

Recommendation 12 of the Murray Review recommended, in part:

  • that Special/Standing Appropriations and their continued operation be given greater attention whereby:

(a)    the Government conduct a housekeeping exercise and repeal standing appropriations that are redundant

(b)   at least annually Finance undertake a review of these appropriations and report to Parliament as to whether there is a continuing need for the appropriations and/or the legislation within which those appropriations clauses reside.[4]

The Government response noted this recommendation and agreed that Standing Appropriations should be regularly reviewed. [5]

Accordingly, the Government committed to review and repeal redundant provisions as part of the process of cleaning up the statute book in relation to the financial regulatory framework. It undertook to conduct housekeeping exercises and to repeal redundant standing appropriations.

According to the Minister’s second reading speech, the Bill contains no significant policy changes.[6]  In this sense, the Statute Stocktake Bills are similar to the Statute Law Revision Bills which have the purpose of correcting minor technical and drafting errors, and repealing obsolete provisions and Acts that have no current or future operation.


Key provisions

The Bill has two schedules. Schedule 1 would repeal 13 special appropriations that have either been fully expended or are in relation to functions no longer being undertaken.

Schedule 2 will repeal 26 redundant special appropriations.

A special appropriation is defined in the following terms:

A special appropriation is a provision within an Act that provides authority to spend money for particular purposes, for example, to finance a particular project or to make social security payments. Special appropriations account for around three quarters of all government expenditure each year.[7]

Due to the housekeeping nature of this Bill it is not necessary or useful to analyse the amendments in detail. A description and explanation of each item is carefully annotated in the Explanatory Memorandum to the Bill.

Financial implications

According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the proposed amendments have no financial impact.

The amendments are aimed at repealing redundant special appropriations.[8]


Members, Senators and Parliamentary staff can obtain further information from the Parliamentary Library on (02) 6277 2526.


[1].       G Gray, ‘Second reading speech: Statute Stocktake Bill (No. 1) 2011’, House of Representatives, Debates, 23 March 2011, p. 2981.

[2].       A Murray, Review of Operation Sunlight: overhauling budgetary transparency, Canberra, June 2008, p. 3 and Appendix 1,

[3].       Ibid., p. 3, and Appendix 1.

[4].       Ibid, p. 10.

[5].       Australian Government, Government response to Operation Sunlight: overhauling budgetary transparency, June 2008, Canberra, 1 January 2008.

[6].       G Gray, ‘Second reading speech: Statute Stocktake Bill (No. 1) 2011’, House of Representatives, Debates, 23 March 2011, p. 2981, viewed 23 May 2011,;fileType=application%2Fpdf.

[7].       Department of Finance and Deregulation, The Commonwealth’s Appropriation framework-an introduction, viewed 18 May 2011,

[8].       Explanatory Memorandum, Statute Stocktake Bill (No. 1) 2011, p. 1.

For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.

Back to top

© Commonwealth of Australia

This work is copyright. Except to the extent of uses permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, no person may reproduce or transmit any part of this work by any process without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Librarian. This requiremen© Commonwealth of Australiat does not apply to members of the Parliament of Australia acting in the course of their official duties.

This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.

Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library’s Central Entry Point for referral.