Bills Digest no. 28 2006–07
Higher Education Legislation Amendment (2006 Budget and
Other Measures) Bill 2006
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Financial implications
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Higher
Education Legislation Amendment (2006 Budget and Other Measures)
Bill 2006
Date introduced: 6 September 2006
House: House of
Representatives
Portfolio: Education, Science and Training
The Bill will amend the Higher Education Support Act
2003 (HESA) to revise maximum funding amounts to:
- increase Commonwealth supported places in health workforce
courses
- fund new places at a centre of excellence in Islamic
Studies
- increase Capital Development Pool (CDP) funding
- fund the Commercialisation Training Scheme (CTS)
- provide funding for the Federation of Australian Scientific and
Technological Societies
- provide funding for the Council for the Humanities, Arts and
Social Sciences
- increase maximum payments for Commonwealth Scholarships
and
- reflect indexation increases for the years 2007 to 2009 and to
add a new funding year 2010.
The Bill will also amend the HESA to:
- revise the FEE-HELP limit
- extend summer schools provisions to winter schools
- replace student cohort provisions to allow providers further
flexibility in setting student contributions and tuition fees
- provide for the rounding in the calculation of accumulated HELP
debts
- provide additional requirements in the Administration
Guidelines to clarify the arrangements for electronic
communications between providers and students; and
- allow the Commonwealth to regulate higher education and
prescribe fees in the external territories.
The Bill will also amend the Higher Education Funding Act
1988 (HEFA) to:
- reflect indexation increases for transition funding for 2007,
and
- remove the HECS account.
The Bill will also amend the Australian Research Council Act
2001 to:
- Reflect updated annual caps on funding.
Background
In April 2002 the Minister for Education, Science and Training,
the Hon. Dr. Brendan Nelson, announced that a review of higher
education policy would be undertaken over the remainder of the
year. The review culminated in the higher education policy package,
Backing Australia s Future, which was announced as part of
the 2003-04 Budget. The Government s reform package was introduced
with the passage of the Higher Education Support Act 2003
(HESA). The legislation introduced major funding changes in
2005.(1)
Under the new Commonwealth Grant Scheme, Commonwealth operating
grants for universities are now calculated on a funding formula
based on student numbers and discipline mix. Funds per student
place were increased by 2.5 per cent in 2005, 5.0 per cent in 2006
and 7.5 per cent in 2007. These increases were conditional on
institutions complying with the Commonwealth's model for
institutional governance ('National Governance Protocols') and
workplace relations policies. From 2004 the Government incorporated
a regional loading with students attending regional campuses
attracting additional payments for the institution depending upon
the location and size of the campus. From 2005, institutions in
receipt of Commonwealth supported places determine their own
student contribution level for each course they offer within ranges
set by the Commonwealth.
The reforms also introduced the HECS-HELP scheme to replace
HECS. This new scheme applied to all higher education students
enrolling in 2005 and later years. Students who were already
enrolled will continue to be liable for the old HECS rates of
payment until the end of 2008. In addition, the Government
introduced income contingent loan schemes for students paying
full-fees (FEE-HELP) and for those who wish to study abroad for one
or two semesters (OS-HELP).
The bill increases the overall appropriation under the
Higher Education Support Act 2003, by $6,230.381 million
for the period 1 July 2006 to 31 December 2010. The increased
appropriation will
- vary the maximum grants under the Commonwealth Grants Scheme by
$4,055.801 million to fund increased Commonwealth funded
places
- vary the maximum payments for Other Grants by $1,941.573
million, to increase Capital Development Pool (CDP) funding, fund
the Commercialisation Training Scheme and provide funding for the
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies the
Council for the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences and
- vary the maximum payments for Commonwealth Scholarships by
$233.007 million.
The Explanatory Memorandum states
the estimated financial impact of increasing the FEE-HELP limit
over the four years 2006-07 to 2009-2010 is $18.293 million on the
fiscal balance, expenses amount to $20.759 million and headline
cash is -$78.458 million. In the 2006-07 Budget the Minister
estimated the cost would be $78.5 million.(2)
The Explanatory Memorandum states
the estimated financial impact of introducing a winter schools
provision under HESA over the forward estimates period (2006-07 to
2009-10) is $0.294 million on the fiscal balance, expenses amount
to $0.340 million and headline cash is -$1.290 million.
The Explanatory Memorandum states
the estimated financial impact of introducing a rounding in the
calculation of HELP debts over the forward estimates period
(2006-07 to 2009-10) is -$0.001 million on the fiscal balance,
expenses amount to $0.001 million.
The Bill increases the overall appropriation by $0.154 million
under the Higher Education Funding Act 1988 for the period
1 January 2007 to 31 December 2007 to reflect indexation increases
for transition funding in 2007.
The Bill increases the overall appropriation by $29.239 million
under the Australian Research Council Act 2001, for the
period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2009 to update annual caps on
funding.
Schedule 1 deals with amounts relating to grants, including the
application of the Government s indexation formula, for increased
Commonwealth supported places (formerly called HECS places) funded
by the Commonwealth Grant Scheme.
The Bill funds:
- 1036 additional nursing places commencing in 2007. The places
will increase to 2,735 additional nursing places by 2010
- 200 additional new commencing medical places in 2007. These
will increase to 405 by 2009
- 431 additional new places in undergraduate nursing courses with
a mental health major commencing in 2007. This will increase to at
least 1,148 places by 2010
- 210 additional Commonwealth supported postgraduate clinical
psychology places commencing in 2007. This will increase to 400
places by 2008(3)
- An increased Commonwealth contribution amount for nursing units
of study to $10,189 in 2007 (formerly $9,316);(4)
- 40 new places at a proposed National Centre for Islamic
Studies.
In January 2006, the Productivity
Commission reported that shortages persisted across a number of
Australia s health professions and that factors such as development
in technology, growing community expectations of what the health
system can deliver and population ageing, would increase future
demand for health services. The Commission concluded that while
part of the solution to the problem was improving the retention
rate for existing workers, encouraging workers to re-enter the
workforce and improving workforce distribution, essentially
Australia needed to train more health workers to meet the projected
needs of the population.(5)
In February 2006 the Council of
Australian Governments (COAG) meeting recognised the urgency of
addressing the national health workforce shortage.(6) On
5 April 2006, the Prime Minister announced 420 additional mental
health nursing places and 200 clinical psychology places as part of
the Commonwealth s contribution to the COAG mental health package.
On 8 April 2006 the Government announced an additional $250 million
to provide 400 new medical school places and over 1,000 new higher
education nursing places.(7) Following the July Council
of Australian Governments (COAG) meeting, it agreed to fund a
further 205 medical school places.(8)
Government funding of $8 million for
a National Centre for Islamic Studies was announced in a Joint
Media Release by the Minister for Education, Science and Training,
the Hon. Julie Bishop and the Parliamentary Secretary to the
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, the Hon. Andrew
Robb on 16 July 2006.(9) Classes are expected to begin
in 2007 with 300 students. The Department of Education, Science and
Training (DEST) has called for expressions of interests from
universities to host the proposed National Centre. The bill
increases funding to provide for 40 new places at the centre.
Item 6 inserts new table items in subsection
41-45(1) to vary maximum payments to increase Capital Development
Pool (CDP) funding; fund the Commercialisation Training Scheme
(CTS); provide funding of $1.5 million over four years for the
Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies and
the Council for the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences.
The CDP was established in 1994 to
provide special assistance to new campuses and those undergoing
expansion. Extra funding of $95.5 million over four years for the
CDP was announced in the 2006-07 Budget. This funding is separate
from the $25.5 million of capital funding in the Bill to support
new medical places at James Cook University, the University of New
England and the University of Queensland.(10)
Universities are asked to bid for the extra CDP funding for
infrastructure projects to commence in 2007.(11)
As part of Backing Australia s Ability Building our Future
through Science and Innovation, the Government announced that
around 250 new postgraduate research scholarships would be created
to provide high quality research commercialisation training for the
next generation of Australian researchers as a means of equipping
them with the skills, knowledge and experience necessary to bring
research-based ideas, inventions and innovations to market. These
scholarships will be delivered through a new programme called the
Commercialisation Training Scheme (CTS). DEST estimated allocations
of approximately $5 million under the CTS each
year.(12)
Schedule 2 deals with FEE-HELP limit.
Item 2 repeals section 104-20 and substitutes a
new section to increase the general FEE-HELP limit to $80,000 and
the FEE-HELP limit for students in medicine, dentistry or
veterinary science courses to $100,000.
Since 2005 full-fee paying domestic students are eligible for an
income contingent loan scheme called FEE-HELP. After the COAG
meeting on 10 February 2006 the Prime Minister announced that the
upper limit on FEE-HELP for medical students would rise from
$50,000 to $80,000.(13) However in the 2006-07 Budget
the Minister announced the general FEE-HELP loan limit would be
increased from $50,950 to $80,000 and for medicine, dentistry and
veterinary science students, the FEE-HELP loan limit will be
increased to $100,000. The Minister estimated that additional
FEE-HELP loans of $78.5 million would be made over four
years.(14)
The increased loan limit applying to medicine, dentistry and
veterinary science reflects the costs of the courses. As the
Australian Medical Association point out Medicine now tops the list
of the most expensive full-fee paying courses at university - with
a University of NSW combined Medicine/Arts degree now costing
$237,000 .(15) The AMA estimates that 300 full-fee
paying medical students enrol each year and predicts this figure to
rise to around 700 students a year. The AMA opposed the increased
cap in full-fee medical places, announced by the Minister in
February 2006, and would prefer to see all medical school places
being Commonwealth supported places.(16)
Schedule 3 deals with student contribution amounts and tuition
fees.
Sections 19-85 to 19-105 of HESA require higher education
providers to determine the same student contribution amounts
(previously HECS fees) and tuition fees for all students in the
same courses. Part 1 makes amendments that allow
providers to set different contribution amounts and tuition fees
for students in the same units. Possible factors in determining
differential amounts are: mode of course delivery (distance
education, on-line or on campus), campus (metropolitan or regional)
and year of commencement (rather than current student cohort
provisions). The Bill allows the Minister to specify in the Higher
Education Provider Guidelines matters that providers may not
consider when setting more than one contribution or fee. The
details of such prescribed factors are not yet available.
Item 5 amends section 19-95 requiring providers to
publish information about contributions and fees that will allow
students to determine which contribution amount or tuition fee
applies to them.
Part 2 deals with saving provisions ensuring
that any determination on student contributions and tuition fees
made before the amendments take effect will be saved and apply to
those students who enrolled under the determination.
These amendments further extend the flexibility given to
providers under the changes implemented in 2005 allowing
institutions in receipt of Commonwealth supported places to
determine their own student contribution level for each course they
offer within ranges set by the Commonwealth. The former three HECS
bands, each with a fixed rate of student contribution, were
replaced by ranges. The top of these ranges was 25 per cent higher
than the level of HECS under the former arrangements. The bottom of
each range is $0 and institutions are able to set the student
contribution at any point within these ranges. Under the amendments
student contributions will remain subject to the maximum amounts
for Commonwealth supported students specified in the Act and
tuition fees can not be set below the tuition fee minimums for
fee-paying students.
Schedule 4 deals with technical amendments related to the
calculation of HELP debts.
Items 1 and 2 repeal the Higher Education
(HECS) Account.
Until the commencement of HESA in 2005 Higher Education
Contribution Scheme (HECS) payments to higher education
institutions were made under the provisions of Part 4.3 of the
Higher Education Funding Act 1988 (HEFA) which established
the Higher Education (HECS) Special Account. Amounts, such as HECS
debt repayments, were still credited to the Account until 1 June
2006. The Bill will repeal the HECS Account and any amounts in the
Account will go to consolidated revenue.
Schedule 6 extends the full-fee summer schools provisions to
winter schools. Under the summer school provisions students in
Commonwealth supported places can choose to pay fees and complete
units during summer schools. These provisions will now also apply
to winter schools. Such provisions allow students more flexibility,
for example to complete their courses in a shorter time, or to
repeat a unit without waiting for the unit to be offered in the
usual semester.
Schedule 7 deals with provisions for the Administration
Guidelines. The Guidelines will allow, but not compel, students and
higher education providers to use electronic communications.
Schedule 8 makes technical amendments to permit the Government
to regulate higher education in external territories.
Items 1, 2 and 3 amend section 49 of the
Australian Research Council Act 2001 to increase funding
caps to reflect revised forward estimates.
Concluding comments
The most significant features of the Bill relate to the funding
for increased health workforce places and the provisions to
increase the FEE-HELP limit. State Governments welcomed the
outcomes of the February COAG meeting but Premier Beattie later
expressed concern at the shortfall in the number of medical and
nursing places in Queensland.(17) States that had
initially missed out on places were more pleased with the final
outcomes of the July COAG meeting.(18) The Australian
Nursing Federation welcomed the increase in funding but, concerned
with the shortage of nurses, resolved to lobby the Federal
Government to allocate more places and the states and territories
to increase their allocation of training places for enrolled
nurses.(19) The Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee
(AVCC) considers the increase to the Commonwealth contribution for
nursing places to $10,189 insufficient for the cost of course
provision that will include clinical practical
costs.(20)
The Australian Medical Association (AMA) is concerned that
full-fee paying students will not be guaranteed clinical training
places and has called on the Government to make all medical places
Commonwealth funded places. The AMA argues that higher number of
full-fee places will do nothing to get young doctors to where they
are needed most, especially regional Australia. In fact, it will
probably have the opposite effect. The AMA calls on all levels of
Government to do their bit and, as a matter of urgency, cut the
number of full-fee paying places and increase the clinical training
capacity in our teaching hospitals .(21) The Government
s decision to change the cap on full-fee places in medicine and the
provisions of the Bill to increase the FEE-HELP limit are likely,
however, to encourage an uptake of full-fee places.
The policy to permit universities to charge fees for domestic
undergraduate students was introduced in 1996 and implemented in
1998 when 829 undergraduate students accepted fee paying
places.(22) By 2004 there were 13,959 domestic full-fee
paying undergraduate students (or 2.65 per cent of domestic
undergraduate students) and 964 were in Health courses which
include Medicine and Dentistry.
FEE-HELP, the income contingent loan scheme commenced in 2005 It
replaced the Postgraduate Education Loans Scheme (PELS) and
extended loans to full-fee paying undergraduate domestic students
at both public and private higher education institutions. The
policy has been described as the most important piece of university
policy since the abolition of fees in 1974 and innovative and good
.(23) Its effect is not yet fully evident but is likely
to increase the uptake of full-fee places and to further increase
competition for those students between providers.
Professor Bruce Chapman predicts that by 2008, one in ten
domestic students will be full-fee paying students, partly as a
result of FEE-HELP and partly due to other factors such as a small
growth in HECS liable places and a reduced differential between
full-fees and HECS. He argues that such a trend will diminish the
access of relatively poor prospective students .(24)
Some universities support this view and remain opposed to offering
places that cannot be attained on merit.(25) But the
majority of universities do offer full-fee places and FEE-HELP can
be seen as a way of improving access to those students without the
resources to pay upfront fees.
FEE-HELP will also have an economic impact on the higher
education sector. Critics such as Simon Marginson argue that:
FEE-HELP makes the full-fee market viable. It also makes viable a
large American-style private sector, with small specialist
institutions and elite Ivy League Private Universities subject to
government approval. (26) Others welcome such
developments arguing that the policy will help empower universities
as entrepreneurs and students as consumers .(27)
Enrolment data is not yet available but media reports suggest the
demand for places at the Group of Eight universities, attractive in
terms of location and reputation, has increased and that there has
been significant uptake in places at private education
institutions. However there is also evidence that some courses at
regional and younger universities, such as commerce at Deakin
University, are also attracting more fee paying
students.(28) FEE-HELP is likely to contribute to
diversity in the higher education sector but as some regional
universities have found, if they cannot fill their Commonwealth
supported places quota they are not able to take advantage of any
increased demand that FEE-HELP might offer.
By increasing the FEE-HELP limit the Bill responds to criticism
from a range of education academics, policy advisers and
administrators that the FEE-HELP limit is too low, that there is a
likelihood of students running out of funds and not completing
their course, that it deters poorer students and that it does not
cater for the range of courses and fees that are offered. Other
commentators go further, arguing the limit should be raised higher
than the proposed limit, the cap abolished completely or that the
HECS-HELP and FEE-HELP should merge into a single flexible
system.(29)
- For further background see Kim Jackson, Higher Education
Support Bill 2003 , Bills Digest, no. 56, Department of
the Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2003-04.
- J. Bishop (Minister for Education, Science and Training),
Growing
our universities , media release, 9 May 2006.
- Funding of $268.8 million over four years for these extra
places was announced by the Minister, in the 2006-07 Budget. J.
Bishop (Minister for Education, Science and Training), 2020
new higher education places to boost the health workforce ,
media release, 9 May 2006.
- Section 33-5 describes how the contribution amount and the
number of Commonwealth supported places is used to calculate basic
grant amount for a higher education provider.
- Productivity Commission,
Australia s Health Workforce, January 2006.
- Council of Australian Governments Meeting,
Communiqu 10 February, 2006, p. 14.
- J. Howard (Prime Minister), More doctors and nurses for the
health system , media release, 8 April, 2006. See also: J. Bishop
(Minister for Education, Science and Training), Building Australia
s health workforce , media release, 8 April 2006.
- Council
of Australian Governments Meeting 14 July 2006.
- J. Bishop (Minister for Education, Science and Training) and A.
Robb (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Immigration and
Multicultural Affairs),
$8m for Centre of Excellence for Islamic Education National Action
Plan, joint media release, 16 July 2006. See also: A. Robb
(Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Immigration and
Multicultural Affairs),
Key Initiatives Action Plan , media release, 16 July 2006. The
joint press release states that Muslim communities in Australia
will be consulted during the establishment of the institute and it
is expected that the successful university would have the benefit
of a Muslim advisory group. Press coverage has interpreted the
centre as a place for training Muslim religious leaders, but DEST
envisions the centre would provide Islamic studies (similar to
tertiary level theology) and that the qualification or recognition
to practice as a religious leader would be the responsibility of
the Muslim community not the centre.
- J. Bishop (Minister for Education, Science and Training),
Growing
our universities media release, 9 May 2006. The CDP funding
does not include the special one-off capital grants to the John
Curtin School of Medical Research at the Australian National
University, the medical school at Bond University, and the Centre
for Transnational Crime Prevention at the University of Wollongong
also announced in the budget press release.
- J. Bishop (Minister for Education, Science and Training), $93.8
million in capital funding for universities , media release, 6
September 2006.
-
Commercialisation Training Scheme on the DEST website has
relevant documents on the outcomes of consultations and the
administrative arrangements for the scheme.
- J. Howard (Prime Minister), Transcript of Press Conference
Parliament House, Canberra, 10 February 2006, p. 2.
- J. Bishop (Minister for Education, Science and Training),
Growing
our universities , media release, 9 May 2006.
- AMA
Federal Council Calls on Government to Dump Policy on Full Fee
Paying Medical Places , media release, 23 August 2006.
- The percentage of Commonwealth supported places (formerly HECS
places) for a course of study in medicine is determined under
section 36-35 (1)(b) of the Act. After the February COAG meeting
the Minister declared that the percentage of Commonwealth supported
places for a course in medicine is 75%. (Federal Register of
Legislative Instruments F2006L00631) The effect of this declaration
is to increase the cap on the number of full-fee paying medical
places for Australian students from 10 to 25 per cent. AMA Federal Council
Calls on Government to Dump Policy on Full Fee Paying Medical
Places , media release, 23 August 2006. See also AMA Debt and Doubt for
Full Fee Students , media release, 25 July 2006.
- New medical places not nearly enough: Beattie , Canberra
Times, 10 April 2006.
- Mark Metherell and Steve Burrell, PM lauded by Premiers after
funding accord , Sydney Morning Herald, 15 July, 2006;
Extra places for health , The Mercury, 15 July 2006.
- Australian Nursing Federation, Positive
first steps to address the nursing shortage , media release, 8
April 2006.
- AVCC submission to the Senate Employment, Workplace Relations
and Education Committee, Inquiry into the provisions of the Higher
Education Legislation Amendment (2006 Budget and Other Measures)
Bill 2006. (September 2006)
- AMA
Federal Council Calls on Government to Dump Policy on Full Fee
Paying Medical Places , media release, 23 August 2006.
- Senator the Hon. Amanda Vanstone (Minister for Education,
Training and Youth Affairs), Higher Education Budget
Statement, 9 August 1996. Number of students in: Senate
Standing Committee on Employment, Workplace Relations and
Education, Questions on Notice 2005-2006, Supplementary Estimates
Hearing,
E672-06 Attachment 1, November 2005.
- Simon Marginson, The Nelson revolution , (March 2005)
http://www.education.monash.edu.au/centres/mcrie/docs/selectedmediaarticles/the-age-070305-marginson.doc,
published as A revolution to what end? The Age, 28 March
2005; Andrew Norton, HELPless: How
the FEE-HELP loans system lets students down and how to fix it
, Issue Analysis 68, Centre for Independent Studies, 27
February 2006.
- Bruce Chapman,
Opinion: a critical appraisal of the new higher education charges
for students , Technical Report Seminars, Political Science
Program, Research School of Social Sciences, ANU, 2004.
- Upfront fee payers front up , Campus Review, 3 May
2006, p. 1.
- Simon Marginson, The Nelson revolution , op. cit.
- Andrew Norton, op. cit.
- Upfront fee payers front up , Campus Review, 3 May
2006, p. 1; The shape of things to come , Campus Review,
29 March 2006, pp. 12-13; Private universities star rises ,
Australian Financial Review, 6 March 2006.
- Pressure on loans cap , Australian Financial Review,
27 February 2006; Bruce Chapman, Helping the elite unis grow richer
, The Age, 12 May 2006; Andrew Norton, op. cit.
Dr Coral Dow
Social Policy Section
3 October 2006
Bills Digest Service
Parliamentary Library
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the
Australian Parliament using information available at the time of
production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position
of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional
legal opinion.
Staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2006
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2006.
Back to top