Title
|
Published/Presented
|
|
First Commonwealth Conference of Delegated Legislation Committees
|
The Table, 1981
|
|
Law-making in Australia [book review]
|
The Table, 1981
|
|
Proposals for constitutional change in Australia
|
The Parliamentarian, July 1982
|
|
Australia and the ‘Westminster System’
|
The Table, 1982
|
|
Government by judges [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 12 October 1982
|
|
Professional staff and the powers of Parliament [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 9 November 1982
|
|
Questioning the tyranny: the British heritage in Australia’s system of government
|
Quadrant, April 1983
|
|
Parliamentary privilege and the press
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, 4th Special Workshop, May 1983
|
|
|
The House Magazine, 17 May 1983
|
|
The Australian Senate: taking the initiative
|
The Parliamentarian, July 1983
|
|
Committees abroad: Senate officer looks at UK, Canada
|
The House Magazine, 4 October 1983
|
|
Parliamentary control of delegated legislation: an Australian perspective
|
The Parliamentarian, October 1983
|
|
Interparliamentary committee contacts: backbenchers of the world unite?
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, 5th Special Workshop, Brisbane, May 1984
|
|
|
Legislative Studies, Winter 1984
|
|
‘Privilege’: what to remember and what to forget
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, Workshop on Parliamentary Privilege, Melbourne, August 1984
|
|
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn 1986
|
|
Party government versus constitutional government
|
Australian Quarterly, Spring 1984
|
|
Australian Senate: inquiries into the conduct of a judge
|
The Parliamentarian, July 1985
|
|
Australia: Senate select committees on a judge
|
The Table, 1985
|
|
Meetings of the Australian Senate after the dissolution of the lower house
|
The Table, 1985
|
|
Is Parliament House a sanctuary? [Comments on the report of the joint select committee of the NSW Parliament on parliamentary privilege]
|
The House Magazine, 16 October 1985
|
|
Parliamentary privilege: the reasons of Mr Justice Cantor—an analysis
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn 1986
|
|
Misleading cases [parliamentary privilege]
|
The House Magazine, 12 March 1986
|
|
Reforming Parliament: a flawed view [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 19 March 1986
|
|
The ‘Murphy affair’ produces conflict between Parliament and the courts
|
The Parliamentarian, April 1986
|
|
Parliament through understanding eyes [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 28 May 1986
|
|
Senate President acts on court judgments
|
The House Magazine, 19 June 1986
|
|
Judges in error [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 20 August 1986
|
|
The British Parliament dissected [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 27 August 1986
|
|
Parliamentary practice: amendment, amendments
|
The House Magazine, 26 November 1986
|
|
The ‘Murphy affair’ ends and the Senate President acts on freedom of speech
|
The Parliamentarian, January 1987
|
|
Privileges bill passes Senate
|
The House Magazine, 8 April 1987
|
|
Parliamentary privilege: reasons of Mr Justice Hunt—an analysis
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn 1987
|
|
Parliament and the judges: the removal of federal judges under section 72 of the Constitution
|
Legislative Studies, Spring 1987
|
|
US Constitution also celebrates bicentenary
|
The House Magazine, 23 September 1987
|
|
Disagreement with the courts over freedom of speech: an Australian parliamentary commission of inquiry
|
The Table, 1987
|
|
Time to remember the revolution of 1688
|
The House Magazine, 24 February 1988
|
|
Why Plato would hate the new Parliament House
|
The House Magazine, 4 May 1988
|
|
Freedom of speech under the bill of rights: recent developments in Australia
|
9th Conference of Commonwealth Speakers and Presiding Officers, London, July 1988
|
|
Legislating and prescribing for parliamentary privilege: problems and solutions
|
19th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Darwin, July 1988
|
|
Constitutionalism and Party Government in Australia
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, Occasional paper no. 1, August 1988
|
|
Parliamentary privilege: changes to the law at federal level
|
The University of New South Wales Law Journal, vol. 11, no. 2, 1988
|
|
Parliamentary privilege: legislation and resolutions in the Australian Parliament
|
The Table, 1988
|
|
The rotation of senators: republican remedies and the Australian Constitution
|
B. Galligan and J.R. Nethercote (eds), The Constitutional Commission and the 1988 Referendums. Canberra, Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations and Royal Australian Institute of Public Administration (ACT Division), 1989
|
|
Keeping the Old Republic: a further appraisal of the new Parliament House
|
The House Magazine, 5 April 1989
|
|
Putting constitutionalism back in the Constitution
|
Policy (St Leonards, NSW), Autumn 1989
|
|
Refurbishing the legislative power
|
20th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Apia, June 1989
|
|
The role of parliamentary officers
|
The House Magazine, 7 June 1989
|
|
Parliament and the legislative power
|
The Table, 1989
|
|
Claims of parliamentary tradition can be a smokescreen
|
The House Magazine, 16 August 1989
|
|
Updating parliamentary privilege: more recent developments in Australia
|
10th Conference of Speakers and Presiding Officers of Commonwealth Parliaments, Harare, January 1990
|
|
Australia’s Commonwealth Parliament 1901–1988: ten perspectives [book review]
|
The Parliamentarian, January 1990
|
|
Parliament and the constitutional design
|
Australian Federal Democracy: Political Theory and Constitutional Design. Canberra, Australian National University, Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, 1990
|
|
The hidden wisdom of the West
|
Quadrant, May 1990
|
|
Parliamentary privileges committees: a rejoinder
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn 1990
|
|
Consideration of legislation by committees
|
21st Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Perth, June 1990
|
|
|
The Table, 1990
|
|
Reference of bills to Senate committees
|
The House Magazine, 12 December 1990
|
|
Unbogging the parliamentary reform wagon
|
Legislative Studies, Summer 1991
|
|
A Parliament votes for war
|
The House Magazine, 13 February 1991
|
|
A modest proposal addressing the question of ‘too many elections’
|
The House Magazine, 15 May 1991
|
|
The need for new procedures for dealing with legislation
|
22nd Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Honiara, June 1991
|
|
Parliamentary reform: new directions and possibilities for reform of parliamentary processes
|
Seminar Papers: Public Seminar on Parliamentarians, the Opposition and Scrutiny of Government. Brisbane, Electoral and Administrative Review Commission, 1991
|
|
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 14, February 1992
|
|
Rescission of order for publication of evidence
|
The Table, 1991
|
|
Information and parliamentary reform: a seminar conducted by the Electoral and Administrative Review Commission of Queensland
|
The House Magazine, 21 August 1991
|
|
Towards closer scrutiny of legislation: new procedures for examination of bills by Senate committees
|
Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, October 1991
|
|
Galligan, Nethercote & Walsh The Cabinet and Budget Processes [book review]
|
Australian Journal of Political Science, November 1991
|
|
Philip Norton, Legislatures [book review]
|
Australian Journal of Political Science, November 1991
|
|
A note on the meaning of ‘republic’
|
Legislative Studies, Summer 1992
|
|
|
D.W. Lovell et al (eds), The Australian Political System. Melbourne, Longman, 1995
|
|
Referring bills to Senate committees: a rejoinder
|
Legislative Studies, Summer 1992
|
|
Rodney Brazier, Constitutional Practice [book review]
|
Political Theory Newsletter, April 1992
|
|
Parliamentary privilege and statutory secrecy provisions
|
23rd Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Adelaide, June 1992
|
|
|
The Table, 1992
|
|
Citizens’ initiative versus constitutional government
|
Legislative Studies, Spring 1992
|
|
Parliament: an unreformable institution?
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 18, December 1992
|
|
Party government: the Australian disease and Australian cures
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, 14th Conference, Canberra, 1992
|
|
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn, 1993
|
|
|
D.W. Lovell et al (eds), The Australian Political System. Melbourne, Longman, 1995
|
|
Constitution, section 53, financial legislation and the houses of the Commonwealth Parliament: papers presented to the Senate and the House of Representatives
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 19, May 1993
|
|
Republicanism, continued: a brief rejoinder to Graham Maddox
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn, 1993
|
|
Republicanism and the Australian Constitution
|
The House Magazine, 5 May 1993
|
|
Parliamentary privilege
|
Australian Law Journal, June 1993
|
|
A. Lijphart, Parliamentary versus presidential government [book review]
|
Australian Journal of Political Science, July 1993
|
|
Interference with witnesses
|
24th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Port Vila, July 1993
|
|
The agenda of the true republicans
|
Introduction to G. Walker, S. Ratnapala and W. Kasper, Restoring the True Republic. St Leonards, NSW, Centre for Independent Studies, 1993
|
|
Parliamentary committees and the public interest
|
Legislative Studies, Spring 1993
|
|
Reforming the ancient constitution [book review]
|
The House Magazine, 15 September 1993
|
|
Keeping the Australian republic
|
Policy (St Leonards, NSW), Spring 1993
|
|
Interference with witnesses
|
The Table, 1993
|
|
Keeping the bastards honest
|
The Reporter, March 1994
|
|
Essentials of republican legislatures: distributed majorities and legislative control
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn 1994
|
|
Parliament’s performance as a legislature: parliamentary scrutiny of legislation
|
Administrative Law Conference, Canberra, May 1994
|
|
Issues arising in the Senate: Taxation Legislation; Constitutional issues; Equally divided votes; Members of other houses as witnesses; Orders for the production of documents
|
25th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Darwin, June 1994
|
|
Taxation legislation: equally divided votes
|
The Table, 1994
|
|
Blunt instruments: parliamentary methods of obtaining information
|
Colloquium on Government and Parliamentary Information, University of New South Wales, Sydney, July 1994
|
|
Parliamentary privilege: New Zealand’s retention of appeals to the Privy Council results in a judgement on an Australian Act of Parliament
|
The House Magazine, 24 August 1994
|
|
Essays on republicanism: small r republicanism
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 24, September 1994
|
|
Government and politics in 2098
|
The House Magazine, 7–14 December 1994
|
|
Can Parliament be reformed?
|
D.W. Lovell et al (eds), The Australian Political System. Melbourne, Longman, 1995
|
|
Reflections on the founders
|
The House Magazine, 1 March 1995
|
|
The problem with Parliament
|
CCF Newsletter, Winter 1995
|
|
Electing a President: the elite versus the public
|
The House Magazine, 5 July 1995
|
|
Recent changes to the Senate’s committee system
|
26th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Port Moresby, July 1995
|
|
Restructuring the Senate’s committee system
|
Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, August 1995
|
|
Parliamentary committees and the executive government
|
Constitutional Law Reform, Attorney-General’s Department, 16 August 1995 (Published as ‘New accountability system emerging’, Directions in Government,September 1995)
|
|
Lessons from Livy
|
Quadrant, October 1995
|
|
Citizen initiated referendums: adjunct or antithesis of constitutional government?
|
6th Samuel Griffith Society Conference, Carlton, Vic., November 1995 (published in Upholding the Australian Constitution, Proceedings of the Samuel Griffith Society Conference, vol. 6, 1995)
|
|
1975 revisited: lost causes and lost remedies
|
ANU Conference on the Constitution and Australian Democracy, Canberra, November 1995
|
|
|
Quadrant, December 1995
|
|
|
M. Coper and G. Williams (eds), Power, Parliament and the People. Leichhardt, NSW, Federation Press, 1997
|
|
Power to prorogue a relic of imperial past
|
The Canberra Times, 1 February 1996
|
|
History revised
|
Quadrant, April 1996
|
|
Protection of persons who provide information to members
|
27th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Hobart, July 1996 (published as ‘Members’ informants: any protection?’ in The Table, 1997)
|
|
The Australian head of state: putting republicanism into the republic
|
Agenda, vol. 3, no. 2, 1996
|
|
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 28, November 1996
|
|
Origins of the elected Senate
|
The House Magazine, 11 December 1996
|
|
Federalism and the role of the Senate
|
Samuel Griffith Society Conference, Canberra, March 1997 (published in Upholding the Australian Constitution, Proceedings of the Samuel Griffith Society Conference, vol. 8, 1997)
|
|
|
The House Magazine, 19 March 1997
|
|
Federalism: an idea whose time has come?
|
Australian National Review, May 1997
|
|
Government and Parliament
|
G. Singleton (ed.), The Second Keating Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 1993–1996. Belconnen, ACT, University of Canberra and Institute of Public Administration Australia, 1997
|
|
Making a nation
|
Introduction to K. Dermody, A Nation at Last: the Story of Federation. Canberra, Department of the Senate, 1997
|
|
|
Crossings, International Australian Studies Association, vol. 2, no. 2, 1998
|
|
Democracy and accountability: accountability to Parliament
|
Best Practice Government Symposium, Insight ’98, February 1998
|
|
Does the government have a Wik double dissolution trigger?
|
Current Affairs Bulletin, February/March 1998
|
|
The wrong-track republic
|
The Canberra Times, 2 March 1998
|
|
Strange death of an Australian republic
|
Australian Constitutional News, March/April 1998
|
|
Franca Arena and parliamentary privilege
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, May 1998
|
|
Bad King John and the Australian Constitution: commemorating the 700th anniversary of the 1297 issue of Magna Carta
|
Papers on Parliament,no. 31, June 1998
|
|
A non-republican republic: the convention’s compromise model
|
University of Queensland Law School, Symposium on an Australian Republic, June 1998
|
|
|
Australian National Review, December/January 1998
|
|
|
The University of New South Wales Law Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, 1999
|
|
|
Australian Constitutional News, February 1999
|
|
Amendment of complex bills and bicameral considerations
|
29th Conference of Presiding Officers and Clerks, Sydney, July 1998
|
|
Constitution, section 57: comments on article by George Williams
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, August 1998
|
|
The other metropolis: the Australian founders’ knowledge of America
|
The New Federalist, no. 2, December 1998
|
|
Reasonably necessary powers: parliamentary inquiries and Egan v Willis and Cahill
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, February 1999
|
|
Constitutional safeguards, bicameralism, small jurisdictions and Tasmania
|
Legislative Studies, Autumn 1999
|
|
Parliament and extra-parliamentary accountability institutions
|
Australian Journal of Public Administration,March 1999
|
|
The cost of the Commonwealth Parliament: amalgamations, values and comparisons
|
Australian Journal of Public Administration,March 1999
|
|
The Senate and parliamentary accountability
|
Canberra, Public Policy Program, Australian National University, 1999. Discussion paper no. 65.
|
|
Enough of executive arrogance?: Egan v Chadwick and others
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, May 1999
|
|
Draft legislation for republic referendum is deficient in detail
|
Australian National Review, June/July 1999
|
|
Senate
|
H. Irving (ed.), The Centenary Companion to Australian Federation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999
|
|
The curse of the Westminster paradigm
|
The Canberra Times,16 September 1999
|
|
Accountability versus government control: the effect of proportional representation
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 34, December 1999
|
|
The Howard Government and the Parliament
|
G. Singleton (ed.), The Howard Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 1996–1998. Sydney, UNSW Press, 2000
|
|
The life of a state: Australia’s longevity
|
The House Magazine, 10 May 2000
|
|
The senators, the Senate and Australia, 1901–1929
|
Introduction to A. Millar (ed.), The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate, vol. 1, 1901–1929.Carlton, Vic., University of Melbourne Press, 2000
|
|
Australia’s first Senate and the senators, 1901–1929
|
The New Federalist, no. 5, June 2000
|
|
Enclosing politicians: the ambitious project [book review]
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, August 2000
|
|
The Australian Constitution and the 1911 myth
|
The House Magazine, 6 September 2000
|
|
|
H.D. Irving et al, Trusting the People: An Elected President for an Australian Republic. Cottesloe, WA, Design by Design Practitioners, 2001
|
|
Australia: the republic referendum
|
The Table, 2000
|
|
The 1911 myth embellished, by Gough
|
The House Magazine, 3–5 December 2000
|
|
Foreword
|
R.P. Broinowski, Witness to History: The Life And Times of Robert Broinowski.Carlton South, Vic., Melbourne University Press, 2001
|
|
The role of the Senate
|
Reform, Australian Law Reform Commission, no. 78, Autumn 2001
|
|
Why the Senate?
|
Federal Gallery, March 2001
|
|
An elected president for an Australian republic: problems and solutions
|
H.D. Irving et al, Trusting the People: An Elected President for an Australian Republic. Cottesloe, WA, Design by Design Practitioners, 2001
|
|
The Senate today
|
13th Samuel Griffith Society Conference, Melbourne (published in Upholding the Australian Constitution, Proceedings of the Samuel Griffith Society Conference, vol. 13, September 2001)
|
|
The Australian Senate: a question of design
|
The Parliamentarian,no. 3, 2001
|
|
Hobbes versus Madison and Isaacs versus Baker: contrary theories and practices in Australian democracy
|
The University of New South Wales Law Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, 2001
|
|
Bryce’s Bible: why did it impress the Australian founders?
|
The New Federalist, no. 8, December 2001
|
|
Public interest immunity claims in the Senate
|
Public Law Review, March 2002
|
|
Senate inquiries: who can be called?
|
The Canberra Times,Public Sector Informant, 2 April 2002
|
|
The Australian Parliament: time for reformation
|
National Press Club address, 24 April 2002 (Extract published as ‘When reform adds up to a rubber stamp’ in The Age, 25 April 2002)
|
|
The limits of parliamentary privilege: judicial confirmation
|
The Canberra Times, 7 May 2002
|
|
The pedigree of the practices: parliamentary manuals and Australian government
|
33rd Conference of Australian and Pacific Presiding Officers and Clerks, Brisbane, July 2002
|
|
Senate order for scrutinising government contracts
|
33rd Conference of Australian and Pacific Presiding Officers and Clerks, Brisbane, July 2002
|
|
The parliamentary power of inquiry: any limitations?
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, National Conference, Melbourne, October 2002
|
|
|
Australasian Parliamentary Review, Spring 2002
|
|
Scrutinising government contracts: a continuing order for documents
|
The Table, 2002
|
|
Fitzpatrick and Browne: imprisonment by a house of the Parliament
|
H.P. Lee and G. Winterton (eds), Australian Constitutional Landmarks. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003
|
|
When in Rome, can we do as the Americans do?
|
The Canberra Times, 21 October 2003
|
|
Consultation with a closed mind
|
The Courier-Mail, 28 November 2003
|
|
Why the Prime Minister’s proposals would dismantle the Constitution
|
16th Samuel Griffith Society Conference, Perth, (published in Upholding the Australian Constitution, Proceedings of the Samuel Griffith Society Conference, vol. 16, March 2004)
|
|
Australia’s senators in the dark age of the twentieth century, 1929–1962
|
Introduction to A. Millar (ed.), The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate, vol. 2, 1929–1962. Carlton, Vic., University of Melbourne Press, 2004
|
|
Unusual measures to scrutinise government spending
|
The Parliamentarian, no. 2, 2004
|
|
Constitutional change, bicameral relations and executive monopoly
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group National Conference, Perth, May 2004
|
|
Renewing the public sphere [book review]
|
The Canberra Times, 1 June 2004
|
|
The traditional, the quaint and the useful: pitfalls of reforming parliamentary procedures
|
35th Conference of Australian and Pacific Presiding Officers and Clerks, Melbourne, July 2004
|
|
Parliamentary privilege and party discipline
|
The Parliamentarian, no. 3, 2004
|
|
Law research and parliamentary activities: a major impact
|
Australian Law Librarian,Summer 2004
|
|
The future of the Senate committee system
|
Committee Bulletin, 1–15 November 2004
|
|
Mandate theory: a bundle of fallacies
|
Impact, Summer 2005
|
|
Beware the monarchical gargoyle in our Constitution
|
The Canberra Times, 25 February 2005
|
|
The Senate after 1 July: a revolution?
|
Committee for Economic Development of Australia briefing, 8 April 2005
|
|
Executive and Parliament
|
C. Aulich and R. Wettenhall (eds), Howard’s Second and Third Governments: Australian Commonwealth Administration 1998–2004. Sydney, UNSW Press, 2005
|
|
A day spent in the public gallery would shock the founding fathers
|
The Sydney Morning Herald, 21 June 2005
|
|
Abuse of majority too risky
|
The Australian,21 June 2005
|
|
Estimates hearings: the grand inquisition
|
The Table, 2005
|
|
Putting Parliament before the courts [book review]
|
The Canberra Times, 4 October 2005
|
|
The failure of the law and the superiority of politics: republicanism versus legal constitutionalism [book review]
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, November 2005
|
|
Parliamentary reform
|
New Matilda, 15 March 2006
|
|
Parliamentary privilege
|
Address to ACT Law Society, April 2006
|
|
Senate estimates hearings and the government majority in the Senate
|
Address to Australian Marketing Institute, National Press Club, Canberra, 11 April 2006
|
|
Corporate governance and a government Senate majority
|
Institute for International Research, 9th Annual Corporate Governance in the Public Sector Conference, Canberra, April 2006
|
|
The case for bicameralism
|
University of Queensland Law School/University of Sunshine Coast Conference, Improving Government Accountability in Queensland: the Upper House Solution?, Brisbane, April 2006
|
|
Lively, analytical history of the NSW Parliament [book review]
|
Constitutional Law and Policy Review, June 2006
|
|
Monarchical and parliamentary government in Australia
|
Insurance Council of Australia, Conference, Canberra, 10 August 2006
|
|
Best to stick with terms we’ve got
|
Australian Financial Review, 28 August 2006
|
|
Democracy: the wrong message
|
Democratic Audit of Australia, Discussion paper 24/06, August 2006
|
|
The government majority in the Senate: a nail in the coffin of responsible government?
|
Australasian Study of Parliament Group, Victorian Chapter, seminar in honour of David Hamer, former Deputy President of the Senate, 3 October 2006
|
|
Constitutionalism, bicameralism and the control of power
|
Australian National University Research School of Social Sciences and Australia–New Zealand School of Government seminar, 4 October 2006
|
|
Ethics and public service governance
|
CPA Australia, ACT Congress, Canberra, 16 November 2006 (Published as ‘The estimates test: a safeguard against illegality and impropriety’, The Canberra Times, Public Sector Informant, 5 December 2006)
|
|
The Senate
|
Chapter 10 of C. Hamilton and S. Maddison (eds), Silencing Dissent: How the Australian Government is Controlling Public Opinion and Stifling Debate. Crows Nest, NSW, Allen & Unwin, 2007
|
|
Parliamentary control of finance: bringing back the revolution
|
The Table, 2007
|
|
Brown’s reforms impact on Australia
|
The Canberra Times, 9 July 2007
|
|
The Senate, accountability and government control
|
Australian Research Council Project ‘Strengthening Parliamentary Institutions’, ANU Parliamentary Studies Centre, Canberra, November 2007
|
|
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 48, January 2008
|
|
Parliamentary privilege and search warrants: will the US Supreme Court legislate for Australia?
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 48, January 2008
|
|
Refurbishing parliamentary processes
|
Published as chapter entitled ‘Parliament’, in Robert Manne (ed.), Dear Mr Rudd: Ideas for a Better Australia. Melbourne, Black Inc. Agenda, 2008
|
|
Accountability and corporate governance in the new Parliament
|
Institute for International Research, 11th Annual Corporate Governance in the Public Sector Conference, Melbourne, March 2008
|
|
The case for bicameralism
|
N. Aroney, S. Prasser and J.R. Nethercote (eds), Restraining Elective Dictatorship: The Upper House Solution? Crawley, WA, University of Western Australia Press, 2008 (also published as ‘Constitutionalism, bicameralism and the control of power’ in Papers on Parliament, no. 50, March 2009)
|
|
Legislative power and executive privilege in the courts
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 49, August 2008
|
|
Masters rule over ‘corrupt system’
|
The Canberra Times, 3 October 2008
|
|
The intertwined history of Canberra and the Parliament
|
Canberra Day Oration, Canberra and District Historical Society, Canberra, March 2009
|
|
The Senate’s power to obtain evidence
|
Papers on Parliament, no. 50, March 2009
|