12 March 2020
PDF version [827KB]
Deirdre McKeown and Rob Lundie
Politics and Public
Administration Section
Executive summary
This Research Paper analyses the results of a study of floor
crossing in the federal parliament from 22 February 1950 to 11 April 2019.[1] The study updates
and revises substantially the findings of a Parliamentary Library study
conducted in 2004 and published in 2005. The analysis shows that:
- during the period of the study there were 520 (2.6%) divisions in
which floor crossings took place
- 295 individual floor crossers (approximately 23% of all MPs who
sat in the parliament from 1950 to 2019) crossed the floor. A larger proportion
of senators (27.5%) crossed the floor than members of the House of
Representatives (20.7%)
- the Coalition participated in 96.8% of floor crossing divisions
compared to Labor’s 3.1% and the Coalition accounted for 90.2% of the
individual MPs who crossed the floor compared to Labor’s 9.8%
- legislative and chamber procedural issues accounted for 25.8% of
all floor crossing divisions followed by taxation issues and the environment
- in the 15 years since the 2004 study the level of dissent in the
federal parliament has declined and floor crossing has not affected the final outcome
of a bill or resolution
- 17 MPs who serve in the current (46th) parliament crossed the
floor during the period of the study, the most frequent floor crossers being
Barnaby Joyce (NP, Qld now NP, NSW) who crossed 28 times and Bob Katter (NP,
IND, now KAP, Qld) who crossed on nine occasions
- since 1950 the government of the day has had a majority in the
Senate on four occasions, each prime minister has experienced increased levels
of floor crossing; additionally the incidence of floor crossing increases the
longer a party is in government
- although some ALP floor crossers have been expelled from the party
and the careers of some Coalition floor crossers have suffered, floor crossing
does not appear to prevent Liberal Party and Nationals MPs becoming party
leaders and
- all Liberal Party leaders have experienced Coalition MPs crossing
the floor with Prime Ministers Robert Menzies and Malcolm Fraser recording the
highest number of floor crossings. One Labor Prime Minister (Bob Hawke) and
four Labor Opposition Leaders were subject to MPs from their party crossing the
floor.
Contents
Executive
summary
Glossary
Introduction
Party
discipline
The study
Conflict
between conscience and party loyalty
Number of MPs
who have crossed the floor
Floor
crossings in the Senate and House of Representatives
Divisions
with single and multiple floor crossers
Floor
crossers by gender
Floor
crossers and floor crossings by party
Floor
crossings in government and opposition
Labor Party
floor crossers and floor crossings
Coalition
floor crossers and floor crossings
Floor
crossers by state and territory
Most frequent
floor crossers
Current MPs
who have crossed the floor
Subjects on
which MPs crossed the floor
The role of
the Senate
Wright and
Wood: views on dissent
Divisions
initiated by floor crossers
Floor
crossing when the Government had a majority in the Senate
Floor
crossings by parliament and year
Effect of
floor crossing on the result of divisions
Threat to
cross the floor
Effect of
floor crossing on an MP’s career
Effect of
floor crossing on becoming party leader
Attitude of
party leaders and colleagues to floor crossing
Influence of
state and local party branchesAlternative
ways of managing dissent
Conclusion
Appendix 1:
Floor crossings by parliament and year
Appendix 2:
Floor crossers
Sources of
biographical information
List of tables
Table 1: Number (%) of MPs who have crossed the floor, 1950– April
2019
Table 2: Number (%) of divisions in which MPs crossed the
floor, 1950–April 2019
Table 3: Divisions with single and multiple floor crossers
Table 4: Number (%) of female and male floor crossers
Table 5: Female MPs who have crossed the floor
Table 6: Number (%) of floor crossers and floor crossing
by party
Table 7: Divisions in which Coalition and Labor MPs both
crossed the floor
Table 8: Floor crossings in government and opposition
Table 9: Labor floor crossings under Labor Party Leaders
Table 10: Coalition floor crossings under Coalition leaders
Table 11: Floor crossers by state and territory and the
proportion of seats allocated
Table 12: Most frequent floor crossers with 10 or more
crossings
Table 13: Current MPs who crossed the floor to April 2019
Table 14: Subjects on which MPs crossed the floor
1950–April 2019
Table 15: Main subjects on which Wright and Wood crossed
the floor 1950–1978
Table 16: Subjects on which MPs have crossed the floor
August 2004–April 2019
Table 17: Divisions initiated by floor crossers
Table 18: Floor crossings during periods of Government
majorities in the Senate
Table 19: Liberal MPs who have crossed the floor before or
after their period as party leader
Table 20: National Party MPs who have crossed the floor
before, during or after their period as party leader
Table 21: Floor crossing divisions and floor crossings for
both chambers by parliament
Table 22: Floor crossings by year
Table 23: Alphabetical list of floor crossers
Table 24: Floor crossers by number of floor crossings
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mark Henry,
Cathy Madden, Michael Sloane, Nicholas Horne, John Warhurst and Maryanne
Lawless for their valuable assistance in preparing this research paper.
Glossary
Crossing the floor
An action in Westminster-style parliaments where a
Government or Opposition member of parliament refuses to vote with his or her
own party in a particular division and crosses the floor of the parliamentary chamber
to vote with the opposing side.
Divisions
Most questions are decided on the voices (‘ayes’
or ‘noes’). A division occurs if a formal count (a division) is required. MPs
voting ‘aye’ move to the right of the Chair, the ‘noes’ to the left.
Floor crossers
Individual members of parliament who crossed the floor (295 in
the period of the study).
Floor crossings
The total number of times members of parliament have crossed
the floor (1,519 in the period of the study).
Floor crossing divisions
Divisions in which individual members of parliament crossed
the floor (520 in the period of the study).
Motions
The business of the Senate and the House of Representatives
is generally dealt with as a series of formal proposals or motions which are
debated and decided by the voices or a division (see above).[2]
Average number of floor crossers in
divisions
The figure is calculated by dividing the number of floor
crossings by the number of divisions. A floor crossing occurs when an MP crosses
the floor in a division. There can be multiple crossings in a single division. In,
for example, two divisions in which six members of parliament cross in the
first division and five in the second the result is 11 floor crossings for the
two divisions with an average number of 5.5 MPs for each division.
Party abbreviations:
ALP Australian
Labor Party
CLP Country
Liberal Party (Northern Territory)
CP Australian
Country Party, from February 1920 (see also NP and NPA below)[3]
IND Independent
KAP Katter’s
Australian Party
LIB Liberal
Party of Australia
NP The
Nationals, from October 2006 (formerly the National Party of Australia)
NPA National
Party of Australia, from October 1982 (formerly Australian Country Party)
Introduction
In 2005 the Parliamentary Library published a preliminary
study of floor crossing in the federal parliament from 1950 to the end of the
40th Parliament in August 2004.[4]
Since 2004, Prime Minister (PM) John Howard gained control of the Senate on 1
July 2005 (41st Parliament), and Prime Minister Julia Gillard governed with a
hung parliament from 2010 to 2013 (43rd Parliament). Other prime ministers
elected since 2004 are Kevin Rudd, Tony Abbott, Malcolm Turnbull and Scott
Morrison.
This paper updates and revises substantially the 2004 study
and analyses floor crossing in the Senate and the House of Representatives (H
of R) from the beginning of the 19th Parliament on 22 February 1950 to the
end of the 45th Parliament on 11 April 2019. It considers whether the amount of
dissent as measured by floor crossing in the Parliament has changed in the 15
years since the preliminary study.
The paper discusses the attitudes of members of parliament
(MPs) who crossed the floor and those of their colleagues and party leaders;
and the political careers of floor crossing MPs.[5]
It also raises issues such as the motivation of frequent floor crossers, the
intersection of conscience voting and floor crossing and the differences in male
and female floor crossing. A detailed analysis of these subjects is beyond the
scope of this current study but worthy of further research. The raw data presented
in this paper could also be used as a basis for additional research on floor
crossing.
Party discipline
In Australia, as in other Westminster parliaments, the major
political parties value party unity and, as a result, attempt to limit dissent
and keep their parliamentary members supporting the party line. [6]
The three major parties—Labor, Liberal and the Nationals—differ
in the way party discipline is enforced. The Labor Party has a
formal pledge that binds all Labor MPs to support the collective decisions of
the Caucus and has expelled MPs who breached the pledge. While the Liberal
Party does not have a pledge there is a tension between party discipline and
personal freedom. Former Liberal Party President, John Valder, stated in a 1983
report that:
... it is important that it be recognised by all Liberal
Parliamentarians that the general expectation is one of loyalty and support for
the Party in the Parliament, and that crossing the floor is to be regarded as
an exceptional act.[7]
Valder noted that crossing the floor was a right which
should be exercised only under certain conditions: where the issue was one of
personal conscience and not merely a difference of policy or political
judgement and where the parliamentary leader and colleagues had prior warning
of the floor crosser’s intentions.[8]
The Nationals do not have a pledge and the Party’s Federal
Constitution states that MPs ‘shall ... support the policies of The Nationals
as espoused by the Federal Parliamentary Nationals’.[9]
But the Nationals website suggests a degree of independence for the
parliamentary party stating that, after consultation, it:
... has the right if necessary to adopt policy positions that
are different from those of Federal Council or Conference... It also has the
right to decide whether or not to enter into, or terminate, a Coalition
agreement ...[10]
The study
For the purposes of this study crossing the floor was
defined as an action in Westminster-style parliaments where MPs from one of the
three major parties (Labor, Liberal or Nationals) refuse to vote with their own
party in a particular division and cross the floor of the parliamentary chamber
to vote with the opposing side.[11]
The study included cases where, although a division was not required, an MP
requested that his or her name be recorded as voting for or against a motion
when their view differed from the position taken by their party.[12]
In the period of the study there were 16 floor crossings in this category
included in the number of floor crossing divisions.
Occasionally MPs resign from their party to join a minor
party or sit as an independent. This study only included floor crossings for
the period an MP was a member of one of the major parties. Floor crossings by
independents and members of minor parties are not included.[13]
The study did not include:
- abstentions from voting, although this is also a form of dissent[14]
- unintentional floor crossings
- free or conscience votes, approved by the party leadership for
all members of the parliamentary party, usually on moral and social issues.
Although conscience is involved in deciding whether or not to cross the floor,
this act is not defined as a free or conscience vote[15]
- floor crossing divisions that occurred in the two periods when
the Liberal Party and the (Country Party) Nationals were not in coalition (December
1972–May 1974 and April 1987–August 1987). During these periods (Country Party)
Nationals members and senators voted with the Labor Government on some issues[16]
and
- votes on Constitution Alteration [referendum] bills after 1984[17]
The study analysed all the divisions in the Senate and House
of Representatives between 1950 and the end of the 45th Parliament (11 April
2019) as officially recorded in Senate Journals and House of
Representatives Votes and Proceedings.[18]
As crossing the floor is a political act and is not identified
in the official records of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the
authors identified those divisions where one or more MPs crossed the floor and
tagged each one according to the following categories:
- date of the floor crossing division
- name, party, state/territory and gender of the floor crosser
- a description of the circumstances in which the division occurred
- whether or not the division was initiated by the floor crosser
- the result of the division and whether or not the act of crossing
the floor affected the result of the division
- the broad subject of the division
- the Prime Minister and Opposition Leader at the time of the
division and
- whether or not the Government had a majority in the Senate at the
time of the division.
All tables in this paper have been compiled by the
Parliamentary Library.
Unless otherwise specified all internet links were accessed
between June and December 2019.
Conflict
between conscience and party loyalty
There are many reasons why members of parliament (MPs) make
the major decision to cross the floor. Political scientist John Warhurst has
said that it is ‘... always a dramatic outcome in a dreary parliamentary process
dominated by united political parties’ and noted that ‘compromise ... is a much
less exciting outcome’.[19]
Crossing the floor is not undertaken lightly even by those
who have done it frequently.
The two most prolific floor crossers in this study were
Senator Reg Wright (LIB, Tas.) and Senator Ian Wood (LIB, Qld) who, over their
long parliamentary careers, crossed the floor 150 and 130 times respectively. Wright denied he found it easy to vote against his party saying that on
such occasions ‘you find no ripple of humour in your bloody soul for a couple
of days; the tensions are quite strong’.[20]
But recent members of parliament who have crossed the floor
are often more reluctant to talk about the experience—the reaction from the
floor crosser’s party or the personal stress associated with the action. In
2013 former WA Liberal member, minister and floor crosser, Judi Moylan, said:
The tension between being a team player and wrestling with
one’s own conscience is one of the most trying aspects of political life.[21]
This statement gives some idea of how difficult it can be to
resolve the conflict between conscience and party loyalty. Ms Moylan described
this dilemma, which she faced when she made the decision to cross the floor on
payments made to single parents:
What really upset me was that I spoke about it in the party
room and said that this was a terribly tough policy and that I wouldn’t support
it even though we [the Coalition Opposition] decided to support the
legislation. I crossed the floor and sat with Adam Bandt [Australian Greens].
It was very difficult for me, but I just felt my conscience couldn’t allow me
to put in ... play such a cruel piece of policy. For some parents it took $100 a
week off them.[22]
Some MPs have talked about the loneliness and stress
associated with crossing the floor, including the walk across the floor of the
Senate or House of Representatives chamber. In her valedictory Senator Sue
Boyce (LIB, Qld) described her floor crossing:
I was not prepared for how I felt when it came to actually
physically crossing the floor. It is lonely; and, no matter how strong your
conviction in the correctness of your stance, there is a small part of you that
feels disloyal to your colleagues, to your party and to the fragile fabric that
unites us.[23]
Former NSW Nationals member Kay Hull crossed the floor twice
in 2015, each time alone, in protest against the Coalition government’s Telstra
privatisation bill. She described ‘the walk’ across the chamber:
It was so disappointing that I was just the one
person who crossed the floor. And ... it was just the worst walk. It's the walk
of death to walk in the chamber and to walk across and sit on the other side
from your Party members. And I felt it. It was just extraordinary to make that
walk. And I walked that walk a hundred times in the week leading up to the
division, just knowing that I had to do it. It was really big and it was
horrendous. I remember sitting in the seat and opposite my colleagues, and
there was just a hush over the room. The first message that came up to me
whilst I was sitting there was from Julia Gillard ... telling me how brave I was
and how ... she admired my stance. And I thought that was amazing.[24]
Similarly, when Nationals Senator Ron Boswell (Qld) crossed
the floor on the Environmental and Natural Resource Management Guidelines in
December 2008 he said:
Crossing the floor is the longest walk
in politics. It should not be done in hubris or for effect or revenge but in
sincere commitment and belief that the decision before us is above ordinary
gravity, and I believe that is the case today.[25]
Barnaby Joyce (NP, Qld) referred to the emotional impact
when he talked about the assistance he had received from Senate staff in making
decisions about floor crossing:
I know I have a dubious honour of having crossed the floor a
few times in the coalition government. At those times where there is a lot of
emotional weight on you, where there is strong belief that colleagues will
rightly put towards you that you might be doing something that is wrong, if you
needed to bounce an idea off someone it was the staff in the Senate who could
reinforce the proper role.[26]
Differences in ideology
Floor crossing can indicate a more widespread
dissatisfaction with general party direction or philosophy, rather than
opposition to a single issue, and may result in a decision to leave the party
permanently. A recent study of party switching found that ideology is one of
the three broad reasons for leaving a party and, more specifically, that MPs
‘who are driven by ideology prefer to affiliate with an ideologically close
party that can help push their preferred policies’.[27]
After crossing the floor on a number of occasions, both Bob Katter and Cory
Bernardi resigned from their respective parties to sit as independents before
forming their own parties.
Bernardi announced his resignation from the Liberal Party to
the Senate in February 2017 saying:
... the respect for the values and principles that have served
us well seem to have been set aside for expedient, self-serving, short-term
ends. That approach has not served our nation well ...
... today I begin something new, built on enduring values and
principles that have served our nation so well for so long.[28]
He expressed the hope that ‘those who are truly concerned
for the future of our nation will choose to join me’.[29]
Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, Senator Penny Wong
(ALP, SA) responded:
What we have seen today is extraordinary—a government senator
leaving the government benches on ideological grounds and on grounds of
conviction and philosophy.[30]
In 2001 Katter explained his decision to quit the Nationals:
The vast bulk of National Party people would be diametrically
opposed to globalism or deregulation, privatisation and yet speech after speech
would indicate, really, that our leadership is doing a salesman’s job for those
principles.
There’s only a limit to how long you can live with that sort
of gulf.[31]
Number of
MPs who have crossed the floor
Despite the anxieties MPs may feel about
crossing the floor (see above), approaching one quarter of all MPs who served
in Parliament from 1950 to 2019 took that step.
Between 22 February 1950 (the first day of
the 19th Parliament) and 11 April 2019 (the end of the 45th Parliament), 295
individual MPs crossed the floor. Of these, 122 were senators and 177 were members,
including four who crossed the floor in both houses (John Gorton, Don Jessop,
Allan Rocher and Grant Tambling).[32]
This represents 22.7% of all 1,297 MPs who sat in Parliament during this
period. The proportion of floor crossers from the House of Representatives (59.2%)
compared to the Senate (40.8%) broadly reflects the relative size of these Chambers.
A higher percentage of senators (27.5%) crossed the floor than members of the
House of Representatives (20.7%).
Table
1: Number (%) of MPs who have crossed the floor, 1950– April 2019
| Chamber |
Number (%) who crossed
the floor |
Number of different MPs
in each chamber |
Percentage of MPs in
each chamber who crossed the floor |
| Senators |
122 (40.8%) |
443 |
27.5% |
| Members |
177 (59.2%) |
854 |
20.7% |
| |
299(a) |
1,297 |
23.1% |
| Total |
295 (adjusted) |
1,297 |
22.7% |
- This total includes four MPs who crossed the floor in
both Chambers: John Gorton (LIB, Vic.), Don Jessop (LIB, SA), Allan Rocher
(LIB, WA) and Grant Tambling (NP; from 1987 CLP, NT).
Floor
crossings in the Senate and House of Representatives
Divisions in which MPs crossed the floor
made up a very small percentage of all divisions.
There were 20,381 divisions in which an MP
could have crossed the floor. Of these, 520 (2.6%) were identified as divisions
in which MPs crossed the floor. The floor crossing divisions in each chamber
are listed in Table 2.
Table
2: Number (%) of divisions in which MPs crossed the floor, 1950–April 2019
| Chamber |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions |
Number of divisions |
Percentage of divisions
which
were floor
crossing divisions |
| Senate |
353 (67.9%) |
10,304 |
3.4% |
| House of
Representatives |
166 (31.9%) |
10,071 |
1.6% |
| Joint Sitting of
both chambers(a) |
1 (0.2%) |
6 |
16.7% |
| Total |
520 |
20,381 |
2.6% |
- The Joint Sitting of
Parliament occurred on 6 and 7 August 1974.
This is the only Joint Sitting held
pursuant to s. 57 of the
Constitution (the two Houses do sit jointly on other occasions such as the
opening of a new Parliament or an address by a visiting head of government).
Crossing the floor occurred much more frequently in the
Senate than in the House of Representatives.
Of the total 520 floor crossing divisions, not only were
there more than twice as many floor crossing divisions in the Senate (67.9%) as
in the House of Representatives (31.9%), but the percentage of all
divisions in the Senate involving floor crossings (3.4%) was also more than
twice that in the House of Representatives (1.6%). Tables 1 and 2 show that, consistent
with the previous study, the Senate, half the size of the lower House,
continues to be the more rebellious Chamber both in terms of number of floor
crossers and the percentage of floor crossing divisions.
Divisions
with single and multiple floor crossers
In about half (51%) of all floor crossing divisions in both
chambers only a single MP was involved. In approximately 83% of divisions up to
four MPs were involved. These figures are broadly similar in both chambers (see
Table 3).
Table
3: Divisions with single and multiple floor crossers
| Number of MPs crossing
the floor in a division |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions in the House of Representatives |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions in the Senate |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions at the joint sitting |
Total (%) for both
Houses |
| 1 |
80 (48.2%) |
184 (52.1%) |
1 (100.0%) |
265 (51.0%) |
| 2 |
21 (12.7%) |
57 (16.1%) |
|
78 (15.0%) |
| 3 |
23 (13.9%) |
26 (7.4%) |
|
49 (9.4%) |
| 4 |
18 (10.8%) |
23 (6.5%) |
|
41 (7.9%) |
| 5 |
3 (1.8%) |
12 (3.4%) |
|
15 (2.9%) |
| 6 |
3 (1.8%) |
13 (3.7%) |
|
16 (3.0%) |
| 7 |
1 (0.6%) |
7 (2.0%) |
|
8 (1.5%) |
| 8 |
6 (3.6%) |
5 (1.4%) |
|
11 (2.1%) |
| 9 |
2 (1.2%) |
3 (0.8%) |
|
5 (1.0%) |
| 10 |
0 |
4 (1.1%) |
|
4 (0.8%) |
| 11 |
2 (1.2%) |
8 (2.3%) |
|
10 (1.9%) |
| 12 |
0 |
3 (0.8%) |
|
3 (0.6%) |
| 13 |
1 (0.6%) |
0 |
|
1 (0.2%) |
| 14 |
3 (1.8%) |
1 (0.3%) |
|
4 (0.8%) |
| 15 |
1 (0.6%) |
1 (0.3%) |
|
2 (0.4%) |
| 16 |
0 |
5 (1.4%) |
|
5 (1.0%) |
| 17 |
0 |
1 (0.3%) |
|
1 (0.2%) |
| 19 |
1 (0.6%) |
0 |
|
1 (0.2%) |
| 25 |
1 (0.6%) |
0 |
|
1 (0.2%) |
| Total |
166 |
353 |
1 |
520 |
As noted above, in the period of the study the most prolific
floor crossers were two Liberal Party senators (Reg Wright and Ian Wood). In
half (140) of their combined 280 floor crossings they crossed the floor either
alone (110 divisions) or together (30 divisions), accounting for 58.1% of divisions
with one or two MPs and 27.0% of all divisions in which MPs crossed the floor.
Floor
crossers by gender
There have been more male than female floor
crossers, which is not surprising given the greater number of male MPs overall.
However, although women comprised 16.3% of all MPs they only constituted 8.1%
of the MPs who crossed the floor. Compared with the 2004 study, these
statistics show an overall decline in dissent with 11.3% (previously 12.2%) of
women MPs crossing the floor and 25.0% (previously 26.6%) of male MPs.
There were 12 divisions in which women
crossed the floor alone and one division in which two women crossed the floor.[33] These 13 divisions
accounted for 2.5% of the total floor crossing divisions.
Table 4:
Number (%) of female and male floor crossers
| Gender |
Number (%) who
crossed the floor |
Number (%) of different
MPs |
Percentage of MPs
who crossed the floor |
| Female |
24 (8.1%) |
212 (16.3%) |
11.3% |
| Male |
271 (91.9%) |
1,085 (83.7%) |
25.0% |
| Total |
295 |
1,297 |
22.7% |
The most frequent female floor crossers
were Senators Kathy Martin (Sullivan) who crossed 20 times, Flo Bjelke-Petersen
18 times and Shirley Walters 14 times.[34]
Table 5 below shows that these three women, whose careers collectively spanned
the period 1974–2001, accounted for 52 or 44.4% of female floor crossings
compared with the four current female MPs in the list, also all senators, who
accounted for eight or 6.9% of female floor crossing divisions.
The most prolific floor crosser, Kathy Martin
(Sullivan), served in both Houses but only crossed the floor in the Senate,
always with a number of Liberal Party senators described as ‘a group of
recognised dissidents within the parliamentary Liberal Party’.[35] In a speech marking 25
years in the Parliament, Martin (Sullivan) noted that when she was first
elected, nearly 75 years after Federation, how few women had been elected to
the parliament:
At the time that I was elected to parliament
[1974] there had only ever been three women elected to the House of
Representatives and seven to the Senate. So there were only 10 women in
parliament before me.[36]
In 2018, the last full year of the 45th
Parliament, women comprised 32.3% of the federal parliament: 38.2% in the
Senate and 29.3% in the House of Representatives.[37]
Table 5: Female MPs who have crossed the floor
| Senator or Member,
period of service |
Number of floor
crossings |
| Senator Kathy
Martin (Sullivan) (LIB, Qld)(a) 18.5.1974–5.11.1984; 1.12.1984–8.10.2001 |
20 |
| Senator Flo
Bjelke-Petersen (NPA, Qld) 12.3.1981–30.6.1993 |
18 |
| Senator Shirley
Walters (LIB, Tas.) 13.12.1975–30.6.1993 |
14 |
| Senator Ivy Wedgwood (LIB,
Vic.) 10.12.1949–30.6.1971 |
9 |
| Senator Fiona Nash (NP,
NSW) 1.7.2005–27.10.2017 |
7 |
| Senator Nancy Buttfield
(LIB, SA) 11.10.1955–30.6.1965; 1.7.1968–11.4.1974 |
6 |
| Senator Agnes Robertson
(CP, LIB, WA) 10.12.1949–30.6.1962 |
6 |
| Judi Moylan MP (LIB, WA)
13.3.1993–5.8.2013 |
5 |
| Senator Judith Adams (LIB,
WA) 1.7.2005–31.3.2012 |
4 |
| Senator Michaelia Cash
(LIB, WA) 1.7.2008–current |
4 |
| Kay Hull MP (NP, NSW)
3.10.1998–19.7.2010 |
4 |
| Senator Sue Boyce (LIB, Qld)
19.4.2007–30.6.2014 |
3 |
| De-Anne Kelly MP (NPA, Qld)
2.3.1996–24.11.2007 |
3 |
| Senator Judith Troeth (LIB,
Vic.) 1.7.1993–30.6.2011 |
3 |
| Senator Bridget McKenzie
(NP, Vic.) 1.7.2011–current |
2 |
| Senator Marie Breen (LIB,
Vic.) 1.7.1962–30.6.1968 |
1 |
| Kay Brownbill MP (LIB, SA)
26.11.1966–25.10.1969 |
1 |
| Natasha Griggs MP (CLP, NT)
21.8.2010–2.7.2016 |
1 |
| Senator Lucy Gichuhi (LIB,
SA)(a) 19.4.2017–30.6.2019 |
1 |
| Senator Margaret Reid (LIB,
ACT) 5.5.1981–14.2.2003 |
1 |
| Senator Anne Ruston (LIB,
SA) 5.9.2012–current |
1 |
| Senator Amanda Stoker (LIB,
Qld) 21.3.2018–current |
1 |
| Sharman Stone MP (LIB, NSW)
2.3.1996–9.5.2016 |
1 |
| Senator Amanda Vanstone
(LIB, SA) 1.12.1984–26.4.2007 |
1 |
| Total |
117 |
- Floor crossings as a Liberal senator only.
Floor
crossers and floor crossings by party
MPs from the Liberal Party and the
Nationals have been much more likely to cross the floor than members of the ALP.
Table 6 indicates that 185 individual Liberal Party MPs crossed the floor in
429 divisions at an average of 2.8 MPs per floor crossing division, and two
Country Liberal Party members crossed the floor in five divisions at an average
of one MP per floor crossing division. In comparison, 29 individual Labor Party
MPs crossed the floor in 19 divisions at an average of 2.1 MPs per floor crossing
division. The Nationals had 80 individual MPs cross the floor in 148 divisions
at an average of 2.0 per floor crossing division. The Coalition
accounted for 90.2% of the individual MPs who crossed the floor compared to
Labor’s 9.8% (see column 2 in Table 6). The Coalition participated in 96.8% of
floor crossing divisions compared to Labor’s 3.1% (see column 3 in Table 6).
The average number of MPs in each floor crossing division across all parties
was 2.5.
Table 6: Number (%) of floor
crossers and floor crossing by party
| Party |
Number
(%) of individual floor
crossers |
Number
of floor
crossing divisions |
Average
number of
MPs per floor
crossing division(c) |
| Australian Labor Party |
29 (9.8%) |
19 (3.1%) |
2.1 |
| Country Liberal Party |
2 (0.7%) |
5 (0.8%) |
1.0 |
| Liberal Party |
185 (62.5%) |
429 (71.4%) |
2.8 |
| National Party |
80 (27.0%) |
148 (24.6%) |
2.0 |
| |
296(a) |
601(b) |
2.5 |
- Includes Senator Agnes Robertson (LIB; CP from
1955, WA) who crossed the floor as a member of the Liberal Party and the Country
Party.
- Exceeds the total number of floor crossing divisions of 520 because it
includes divisions where MPs from more than one party crossed the floor. This
includes six divisions in which both Labor and Coalition MPs crossed the floor
(see table 7 below).
- This figure is calculated by dividing the number
of floor crossing events by the number of divisions. See the Glossary (p. 4)
for a more detailed explanation.
Table 7 lists the six divisions in which Labor and Coalition
MPs both crossed the floor. The crossing in the H of R on 29 May 1979 (in Table
7 below) is the only occasion members of both Labor and the Coalition have
crossed the floor when their parties supported opposing sides in a division.
Table 7:
Divisions in which Coalition and Labor MPs both crossed the floor
Chamber/
Division Date |
ALP floor crossers |
Coalition floor
crossers |
Subject |
Prime Minister |
Opposition Leader |
H of R
5.3.1952 |
3 |
1 |
A motion to adjourn the
House was opposed by Govt and Opposition. The motion was defeated.[38] |
Menzies |
Evatt |
Senate
21.10.1953 |
5 |
9 |
A motion that debate be
adjourned during debate on assistance to the berry fruits industry was
supported by Govt and Opposition. The motion was passed.[39] |
Menzies |
Evatt |
Senate
15.9.1954 |
4 |
12 |
A motion to have the Sugar
Agreement Bill 1954 referred to a Select committee was opposed by Govt and
Opposition. The motion was defeated.[40] |
Menzies |
Evatt |
Senate
9.6.1955 |
2 |
14 |
An amendment to the
Parliamentary Retiring Allowances Bill 1955 opposed by Govt and Opposition. The
amendment was defeated.[41] |
Menzies |
Evatt |
H of R
28.11.1968 |
11 |
8 |
A motion to adjourn debate
on the Tariff Board Annual Report was supported by Govt and Opposition. The
motion was passed.[42] |
Gorton |
Whitlam |
H of R
29.5.1979 |
1 |
3 |
An amendment (opposed by Govt,
supported by Opposition) moved in the Committee stage of the Customs
Amendment Bill 1979 was defeated.[43] |
Fraser |
Hayden |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor
crossings in government and opposition
Coalition MPs crossed the floor much more frequently when in
government (428 divisions) than when in Opposition (79 divisions). Labor MPs
crossed the floor in twice as many divisions when in Opposition (13) than when
in government (6). For both parties the average number of MPs crossing the
floor in each division was higher when in Opposition than when in Government.
See Table 8 below.
Table 8:
Floor crossings in government and opposition
| |
Opposition |
Government |
| |
Floor crossing divisions
(a) |
Average number of
MPs per crossing the floor division(b) |
Floor crossing divisions
(a) |
Average number of
MPs per crossing the floor division(b) |
| Coalition |
79 |
3.9 |
428 |
2.7 |
| Labor |
13 |
2.6 |
6 |
1.0 |
| |
92 |
3.7 |
434 |
2.7 |
- These figures include the six divisions in which both
Coalition and Labor MPs crossed the floor. See Table 7 above.
- This figure is calculated
by dividing the number of floor crossing events by the number of divisions. See
the Glossary (p. 4) for a more detailed explanation.
The results for Coalition MPs are similar to the findings of
a recent study of floor crossing in the UK Parliament, which found that floor
crossers were loyal when their party was in opposition, but these same MPs were
more likely to rebel when their party was in government.[44]
The authors suggest that, because the government controls the legislative
agenda, it is easier for MPs to rebel against their party in government on
policy grounds, ‘allowing them to represent the interests of certain segments
of their constituency’ while Opposition MPs find it difficult to vote against
their party without appearing to support the policy prerogatives of the
government.[45]
Labor Party
floor crossers and floor crossings
The Labor party has had a total of 29
individual floor crossers spread across 19 floor crossing divisions. The small
proportion of Labor Party floor crossers reflects the party’s particular
emphasis on discipline (see Table 9 below).
Only five of Labor’s 13 individual leaders (prime
minister and opposition leader) have had MPs from their party crossing the
floor. All were Opposition Leaders at the time except for Bob Hawke who was
Prime Minister when two MPs (Senator George Georges and Graeme Campbell MP)
crossed the floor in six divisions. They were suspended from the party for
their actions.
Opposition Leaders Bert Evatt and Gough
Whitlam each had 13 individual MPs cross the floor in six and five divisions
respectively. This accounted for 80.0% of Labor floor crossers. Opposition
Leaders Bill Hayden and Kim Beazley only had one MP cross the floor (in one
division each). Since Gough Whitlam stood down as Opposition Leader in
December 1977, there have only been four individual Labor MPs who have crossed
the floor (in eight divisions). The last Labor MP to cross the
floor was Harry Quick (ALP, Tas.) on 29 November 2005. Although there was no division
he asked that his name be recorded in Hansard as having voted against the Anti-Terrorism
Bill (No. 2) 2005 at the third reading stage.[46]
The highest number of Labor MPs crossing the floor in a
single division occurred in the House of Representatives on 28 November 1968,
when 11 ALP MPs (and eight Coalition MPs) crossed the floor. They voted against
a motion to adjourn debate on the Tariff Board Annual Report. Both Government
and Opposition Whips had agreed to adjourn the debate, although there had been
some dissatisfaction expressed at the amount of time made available to discuss the
report on the last sitting day of the year. Despite the floor crossing, the
motion was passed 54-19.[47]
Table 9: Labor floor crossings
under Labor Party Leaders
| Labor Leader |
Number of individual
floor crossers |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions |
Average number of
MPs per crossing the floor division(c) |
| Ben Chifley (Opposition
Leader, 21.2.1950–13.6.1951) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Bert Evatt (Opposition
Leader, 20.6.1951–9.2.1960) |
13 |
6 (31.6%) |
2.7 |
| Arthur Calwell (Opposition
Leader, 7.3.1960–8.2.1967) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Gough Whitlam (Opposition
Leader, 8.2.1967–5.12.1972) |
13 |
5 (26.3%) |
3.2 |
| Gough Whitlam (Prime
Minister, 5.12.1972–11.11.1975) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Gough Whitlam (Opposition
Leader, 27.1.1976–22.12.1977) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Bill Hayden (Opposition
Leader, 22.12.1977–3.2.1983) |
1 |
1 (5.3%) |
1.0 |
| Bob Hawke (Prime Minister,
11.3.1983–20.12.1991)(a) |
2 |
6 (31.6%) |
1.0 |
| Paul Keating (Prime Minister,
20.12.1991–11.3.1996) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Kim Beazley (Opposition
Leader, 19.3.1996–22.11.2001) |
1 |
1 (5.3%) |
1.0 |
| Simon Crean (Opposition
Leader, 22.11.2001–2.12.2003) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Mark Latham (Opposition
Leader, 2.12.2003–18.1.2005) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Kim Beazley (Opposition
Leader, 28.1.2005–4.12.2006) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Kevin Rudd (Opposition
Leader, 4.12.2006–3.12.2007) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Kevin Rudd (Prime Minister,
3.12.2007–24.6.2010) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Julia Gillard (Prime
Minister, 24.6.2010–27.6.2013) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Kevin Rudd (Prime Minister,
27.6.2013–18.9.2013) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Bill Shorten (Opposition
Leader, 13.10.2013–11.4.2019) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| |
30(b) |
19 |
2.1 |
- Hawke
was also Opposition Leader from 3.2.82–11.3.83 but at a time when Parliament
was not sitting.
- 29 individual Labor MPs crossed the floor, with Bert James (Hunter, NSW)
crossing under both Hayden and Whitlam.
- This
figure is calculated by dividing the number of floor crossing events by the
number of divisions. See the Glossary (p. 4) for a more detailed explanation.
Coalition
floor crossers and floor crossings
Table 10 below shows that all Liberal Party leaders have experienced
Coalition MPs crossing the floor, with Prime Ministers Robert Menzies and
Malcolm Fraser recording the highest number of floor crossing divisions at 162
and 111 respectively. In Opposition, leaders Malcolm Fraser and Malcolm
Turnbull experienced a relatively low number of floor crossing divisions (2 and
11 respectively) but the highest average number of Coalition MPs per floor
crossing division (7 and 7.7 respectively).
Overall, the division in which the highest number of MPs
crossed the floor was also the division in which the highest number of
Coalition MPs crossed the floor. This occurred in the House of Representatives
on 12 May 1955 when 25 Coalition MPs (21 Liberals and four Country Party MPs)
supported Arthur Calwell’s (ALP, Vic.) motion of dissent from the ruling of the
Speaker, Archie Cameron (LIB, SA). The result of the floor crossing was that
Calwell’s motion was passed 61–15.[48]
The highest number of National Party MPs to cross the floor
occurred in the House of Representatives on 15 November 1983 when 14 supported
the second reading of the Labor Government’s Representation Bill 1983, which
sought to increase the number of MPs in Parliament. The Bill passed the second
reading stage 75-26.[49]
Table
10: Coalition floor crossings under Coalition leaders
| Coalition Leader |
Number of individual
floor crossers |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions |
Average number of MPs
per crossing the floor division(c) |
| Robert Menzies (Prime
Minister, 19.12.1949–26.1.1966) |
102 |
162 (32.0%) |
2.9 |
| Harold Holt (Prime
Minister, 26.1.1966–19.12.1967)(a) |
11 |
32 (6.3%) |
1.7 |
| John Gorton (Prime
Minister, 10.1.1968–10.3.1971) |
44 |
48 (9.5%) |
2.4 |
| William McMahon (Prime
Minister, 10.3.1971–5.12.1972) |
17 |
19 (3.7%) |
1.7 |
| Billy Snedden (Opposition Leader,
20.12.1972–21.3.1975) |
9 |
7 (1.4%) |
3.0 |
| Malcolm Fraser (Opposition
Leader, 21.3.1975–11.11. 1975) |
11 |
2 (0.4%) |
7.0 |
| Malcolm Fraser (Prime
Minister, 11.11.1975–11.3.1983) |
66 |
111 (21.9%) |
3.7 |
| Andrew Peacock (Opposition
Leader, 11.3. 1983–5.9.1985) |
35 |
18 (3.6%) |
4.3 |
| John Howard (Opposition
Leader, 5.9.1985–9.5.1989) |
15 |
7 (1.4%) |
3.0 |
| Andrew Peacock (Opposition
Leader, 9.5. 1989–3.4.1990) |
7 |
7 (1.4%) |
2.9 |
| John Hewson (Opposition
Leader, 3.4.1990–23.5.1994) |
9 |
5 (1.0%) |
3.2 |
| Alexander Downer
(Opposition Leader, 23.5.1994–30.1.1995) |
10 |
2 (0.4%) |
5.0 |
| John Howard (Opposition
Leader, 30.1.1995–11.3.1996) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| John Howard (Prime
Minister, 11.3.1996–3.12.2007) |
11 |
35 (6.9%) |
1.3 |
| Brendan Nelson (Opposition
Leader, 3.12.2007–16.9.2008) |
14 |
6 (1.2%) |
4.5 |
| Malcolm Turnbull
(Opposition Leader, 16.9.2008–1.12.2009) |
23 |
11 (2.2%) |
7.7 |
| Tony Abbott (Opposition
Leader, 1.12.2009–18.9.2013) |
12 |
14 (2.8%) |
1.3 |
| Tony Abbott (Prime
Minister, 18.9.2013–15.9.2015) |
5 |
3 (0.6%) |
2.0 |
| Malcolm Turnbull (Prime
Minister, 15.9.2015–24.8.2018) |
15 |
15 (3.0%) |
2.1 |
| Scott Morrison (Prime
Minister, 24.8.2018–11.4.2019) |
3 |
3 (0.6%) |
1.7 |
| |
419(b) |
507 |
2.9 |
- John
McEwen was also Prime Minister but at a time when Parliament was not sitting.
- Includes MPs who crossed the floor under a number of leaders.
- This figure is calculated by dividing the number
of floor crossing events by the number of divisions. See the Glossary (p. 4)
for a more detailed definition.
Floor
crossers by state and territory
There was no significant difference between the states and
territories as to the proportion of MPs who crossed the floor. Table 11 below shows
that, within a margin of about 2%, the number of floor crossers from each state
and territory broadly matches the number of federal seats in those jurisdictions.
The states with the largest number of MPs (New South Wales and Victoria) have a
lower proportion of floor crossers compared to their proportion of
representatives. Queensland and Tasmania have a greater proportion of floor
crossers than their proportion of MPs, while Western Australia has a slightly
higher proportion of floor crossers than its proportion of representatives. South
Australia, although a small state, aligns with the largest states in that it
has a lower proportion of floor crossers compared to its proportion of
representatives.
Table 11: Floor crossers by state and territory and the
proportion of seats allocated
| State or Territory |
Number (%) of floor
crossers |
Proportion of federal seats
(based on 226 seats at 2016 election) |
| New South Wales |
71 (24.1%) |
26.0% |
| Victoria |
57 (19.3%) |
21.7% |
| Queensland |
62 (21.0%) |
18.6% |
| Western Australia |
40 (13.6%) |
12.4% |
| South Australia |
26 (8.8%) |
10.2% |
| Tasmania |
31 (10.5%) |
7.5% |
| Northern Territory |
4 (1.4%) |
1.8% |
| Australian Capital
Territory |
4 (1.4%) |
1.8% |
| |
295 |
|
Most
frequent floor crossers
Appendix 2 lists all senators and members who have crossed
the floor and the number of times each MP crossed (see Tables 23 and 24).
As noted above, by far the most frequent floor crossers were
Senator Reg Wright and Senator Ian Wood who crossed on 150 and 130 occasions
respectively. Of the 295 MPs who crossed the floor, 31 (10.2%) crossed ten times
or more (see Table 12 below). Senators occupy 21 of the top 31 places, with
seven from the House of Representatives and two who crossed the floor in both
houses. All but one of the top 10 floor crossers had finished their
parliamentary careers by 1987. Only two MPs who were still serving at the
completion of the study appear in the list, both Nationals: Senator John
Williams (NSW) and Barnaby Joyce (NSW). Queensland and Tasmania each produced
eight of the most frequent floor crossers followed by Western Australia with
six.
On average, each of the 295 MPs crossed five times. As both
Wright and Wood crossed more than three times as often as the next most
frequent floor crosser, they tend to skew the statistics. Excluding them
reveals that the average number of floor crossings for each MP drops to 4.1.
The third most frequent floor crosser, Liberal Senator Alan
Missen, was elected to the Senate in 1974 and by 1982 was described as ‘indisputably the leading free spirit within the Liberal party.’[50] Missen crossed the floor
on a range of issues often related to human rights and civil liberties. Like
Reg Wright, Missen ‘vehemently repudiated’ portrayals of him as a rebel or
maverick, in Missen’s case ‘even to the point of taking legal action’.[51] Many of Missen’s ‘group
of progressive Liberals’, such as Senators Neville Bonner, Michael Townley, Don
Jessop, Peter Rae, Kathy Martin, Robert Hill, David Hamer and Chris Puplick are
included in Table 14 below.[52]
Despite a steadfast commitment to liberal principles, Missen ‘was never
included on any Liberal frontbench’.[53]
Table
12: Most frequent floor crossers with 10 or more crossings
| MP and period of
service |
Number of floor
crossings |
| Senator Wright, Reg (LIB,
Tas.) 10.12.1949–30.6.1978 |
150 |
| Senator Wood, Ian (LIB,
Qld) 10.12.1949–30.6.1978 |
130 |
| Senator Missen, Alan,
(LIB, Vic.) 18.5.1974–30.3.1986 |
41 |
| Senator Bonner, Neville
(LIB, Qld) 11.6.1971–4.2.1983 |
34 |
| Wentworth, William MP (LIB,
NSW) 10.12.1949–10.11.1977 |
31 |
| Senator Townley, Michael
(LIB, Tas.) 1.7.1971–5.6.1987 |
29 |
| Joyce, Barnaby (NP, Senator
for Qld 1.7.2005–8.8.2013; now NP, NSW 7.9.2013–current) |
28 |
| Senator Jessop, Don (LIB,
SA) 1.7.1971–5.6.1987 |
27 |
| Senator Lillico, Alexander
(LIB, Tas.) 1.7.1959–11.4.1974 |
21 |
| Senator Rae, Peter (LIB,
Tas.) 1.7.1968–16.1.1986 |
21 |
| Senator Martin (Sullivan),
Kathy (LIB, Qld) 18.5.1974–8.10.2001 |
20 |
| Senator Bjelke-Petersen,
Flo (NP, Qld) 12.3.1981–30.6.1993 |
18 |
| Senator Mattner, Edward
(LIB, SA) 10.10.1944–27.9.1946; 10.12.1949–30.6.1968 |
17 |
| Senator Boswell, Ron (NP,
Qld) 5.3.1983–30.6.2014 |
15 |
| Bungey, Melville MP (LIB,
WA) 18.5.1974–5.3.1983 |
15 |
| Senator Archer, Brian
(LIB, Tas.) 13.12.1975–31.1.1994 |
14 |
| Senator Walters, Shirley
(LIB, Tas.) 13.12.1975–30.6.1993 |
14 |
| Senator Sim, John (LIB,
WA) 26.11.1964–30.6.1981 |
13 |
| Senator Williams, John
(NP, NSW) 1.7.2008–30.6.2019 |
13 |
| Senator Cormack, Magnus
(LIB, Vic.) 28.4.1951–30.6.1953; 1.7.1962–30.6.1978 |
12 |
| Rocher, Allan Senator/MP
(LIB, WA) 1.7.1978–10.2.1981; 21.2.1981–3.10.1998 |
12 |
| Turner, Henry MP (LIB, NSW)
20.12.1952–11.4.1974 |
12 |
| Senator Withers, Reg (LIB,
WA) 17.2.1966–26.11.1966; 1.7.1968–5.6.1987 |
11 |
| Burr, Max MP (LIB, Tas.) 13.12.1975–8.2.1993 |
10 |
| Senator Crichton-Browne,
Noel (LIB, WA) 1.7.1981–30.6.1996 |
10 |
| Goodluck, Bruce MP (LIB,
Tas.) 13.12.1975–8.2.1993 |
10 |
| Senator Greenwood, Ivor
(LIB, Vic.) 21.2.1968–13.10.1976 |
10 |
| Senator Hill, Robert (LIB,
SA) 1.7.1981–15.3.2006 |
10 |
| Killen, Jim MP (LIB, Qld) 10.12.1955–15.8.1983 |
10 |
| McColm, Malcolm MP (LIB,
Qld)10.12.1949–9.12.1961 |
10 |
| Senator Seward, Harrie
(CP, WA) 28.4.1951–23.7.1958 |
10 |
Current MPs
who have crossed the floor
Seventeen MPs who serve in the current (46th Parliament)
crossed the floor 75 times during the period of the study (see table 13 below).
The most frequent floor crossers who serve in the current Parliament are Barnaby
Joyce (NP, NSW) who crossed the floor 28 times as a Queensland senator, and Bob
Katter (formerly NP, now KAP, Qld) who crossed the floor as a Nationals member
on nine occasions. Katter is the only current MP who has crossed the floor on a
bill or chamber procedural issue (on five occasions).[54]
Table
13: Current MPs who crossed the floor to April 2019
| MP serving in the 46th
Parliament(a) |
Number of
Floor Crossings |
Subject of floor
crossing |
| Joyce, Barnaby (NP, Qld,
now NP,NSW) |
28 |
Budget (1), education (2),
environment (3), human rights (1), media (4), parliament (1), Primary
industry (2), taxation (4), trade practices (10) |
| Katter, Bob (NP, IND; now
KAP, Qld) |
9 |
Human rights (1),
indigenous affairs (2), tariffs (1), bill/chamber procedural (5) |
| Senator Bernardi, Cory
(LIB, IND, AC, now IND, SA) |
6 |
Education (1), environment
(3), parliament (1), taxation (1) |
| Senator Abetz, Eric (LIB,
Tas.) |
4 |
Education (1), health (1),
human rights (2) |
| Senator Cash, Michaelia
(LIB, WA) |
4 |
Environment (3), parliament
(1) |
| Senator Cormann, Mathias
(LIB, WA) |
4 |
Environment (3), parliament
(1) |
| Broadbent, Russell (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
Immigration (3) |
| Senator Canavan, Matthew
(NP, Qld) |
3 |
Health (1), housing
affordability (1), trade practices (1) |
| Chester, Darren (NP, Vic) |
2 |
Tariffs (2) |
| Christensen, George (NP,
Qld) |
2 |
Industrial relations (1),
taxation (1) |
| Coulton, Mark (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Primary industry (2) |
| McGrath, James (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
Immigration (1),
legalisation of liquid nicotine (1) |
| Senator McKenzie, Bridget
(NP, Vic.) |
2 |
Customs (1), trade
practices (1) |
| McCormack, Michael (NP,
NSW) |
1 |
Environment (1) |
| Senator Ruston, Anne (LIB,
SA) |
1 |
Health (1) |
| Senator Seselja, Zed (LIB,
ACT) |
1 |
Health (1) |
| Senator Stoker, Amanda
(LIB, Qld) |
1 |
Human rights (1) |
- Senator Mitch Fifield (LIB, Vic.) has not been included
as prior to the release of this paper he resigned from the Senate (on 16 August
2019). During his parliamentary career he crossed the floor three times.
Subjects on
which MPs crossed the floor
Table 14 below shows that floor crossings on issues
classified as procedural, either in relation to chamber proceedings or to bills,
is the largest category by subject, representing 134 (25.8%) of all floor
crossing divisions.[55]
As in the case of the 2004 study, taxation is still the next-largest subject for
floor crossing divisions (50). In a change, however, the environment (34) is
now the third major issue on which MPs crossed the floor, followed by primary
industry issues (27). Subjects on which current MPs have crossed the floor are noted
in table 15 above. Since the 2004 study there has been an increase in floor
crossing on primary industry issues; and matters relating to the parliament and
parliamentary entitlements are still issues causing dissent.
The subjects listed in table 14 reflect the wide range of
issues dealt with by the federal parliament over the last seven decades. Some
social or moral issues have been dealt with by one or more of the major parties
granting their members a conscience vote. Sometimes, when this did not occur, MPs
made the decision to cross the floor. This situation occurred in 2013, when the
Liberal Party did not grant its MPs a conscience vote on same-sex marriage
legislation. Senator Sue Boyce (LIB, Qld) crossed the floor, saying that ‘I know that my view on this topic differs somewhat from that of the
coalition’.[56]
Table 14:
Subjects on which MPs crossed the floor 1950–April 2019
| Subject |
Number (%) of floor crossing divisions with
bill or chamber procedural issues |
Number (%) of floor crossing divisions without
bill or chamber procedural issues |
| Bill or chamber procedural
issues |
134 (25.8%) |
|
| Taxation |
50 (9.6%) |
50 (13.0%) |
| Environment |
34 (6.5%) |
34 (8.8%) |
| Primary industry |
27 (5.2%) |
27 (7.0%) |
| Referendum bills
(Constitutional alteration) |
26 (5.0%) |
26 (6.7%) |
| Parliamentary entitlements |
25 (4.8%) |
25 (6.3%) |
| Issues relating to
parliament, the power of parliament, the power of the ministry, size of
parliament etc |
22 (4.2%) |
22 (5.7%) |
| Human rights including
racial discrimination, equal employment and telephone tapping |
20 (3.8%) |
20 (5.2%) |
| Matters referred to a
select committee or a standing committee (main issue is the referral to a
committee) |
17 (3.3%) |
17 (4.4%) |
| Civil aviation issues |
14 (2.7%) |
14 (3.6%) |
| Trade practices |
14 (2.7%) |
14 (3.6%) |
| Electoral law including
redistributions |
13 (2.5%) |
13 (3.4%) |
| Media: media ownership,
broadcasting and television |
12 (2.3%) |
12 (3.1%) |
| Other: maintenance payments
(2 divisions), bankruptcy (2), metric conversion (1), newspapers (1) the
Sorrell Post Office (1), referral of PM Gorton to privileges committee (1),
FOI Bills (2), legalisation of liquid nicotine (1), housing affordability (1) |
12 (2.3%) |
12 (3.1%) |
| Health issues |
11 (2.1%) |
11 (2.8%) |
| Tariffs |
11 (2.1%) |
11 (2.8%) |
| Social services including
repatriation issues |
10 (1.9%) |
10 (2.6%) |
| Industrial relations |
9 (1.7%) |
9 (2.3%) |
| Immigration |
7 (1.3%) |
7 (1.9%) |
| Criminal law |
6 (1.2%) |
6 (1.6%) |
| Education issues |
6 (1.2%) |
6 (1.6%) |
| Customs issues |
5 (1.0%) |
5 (1.3%) |
| Industry |
5 (1.0%) |
5 (1.3%) |
| Indigenous affairs
including native title |
5 (1.0%) |
5 (1.3%) |
| Infrastructure public works
including roads and airport construction |
5 (1.0%) |
5 (1.3%) |
| Legal: judiciary, legal
practitioners, copyright issues |
5 (1.0%) |
5 (1.3%) |
| Issues relating to the ACT
(mainly ordinances) |
4 (0.8%) |
4 (1.0%) |
| Budget: appropriation bills,
financial statements |
3 (0.6%) |
3 (0.8%) |
| Foreign affairs issues
including continental shelf |
3 (0.6%) |
3 (0.8%) |
| Public service matters |
3 (0.6%) |
3 (0.8%) |
| Telecommunications |
2 (0.4%) |
2 (0.5%) |
| Total divisions |
520 |
386 |
During the 28 years Wright and Wood were members of the
Parliament they crossed the floor on similar subjects, with the most important
issue for both senators being bill or chamber procedural matters (see Table 15 below).
This is consistent with the broader results in Table 14 above where 134 (25.8%)
of all floor crossing divisions concerned procedural issues.
Table 15: Main subjects on which
Wright and Wood crossed the floor 1950–1978
| Wright (LIB, Tas.) |
Wood (LIB, Qld) |
| Subject |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions |
Subject |
Number (%) of
floor crossing divisions |
| Bill or chamber procedural
issues |
42 (28.0%) |
Bill or chamber procedural
issues |
37 (28.4%) |
| Issues relating to the
parliament |
13 (8.7%) |
Issues relating to the
parliament |
12 (9.2%) |
| Taxation |
12 (8.0%) |
Referendum bills |
11 (8.5%) |
| Parliamentary entitlements |
12 (8.0%) |
Parliamentary entitlements |
11 (8.5%) |
| Referendum bills |
11 (7.3%) |
Matters referred to a
select committee |
10 (7.7%) |
| Civil aviation |
7 (4.7%) |
Taxation |
9 (6.9%) |
Table 16 below shows that, in the 79 floor crossing
divisions since August 2004, the environment (11) and trade issues (11) have
been the major subjects on which MPs have crossed the floor, followed by human
rights issues (eight). The list includes one issue classified as bill or
chamber procedural.
Table
16: Subjects on which MPs have crossed the floor August 2004–April 2019
| Subject |
Number (%) of floor
crossing divisions |
| Trade practices |
11 (13.9%) |
| Environment |
11 (13.9%) |
| Human rights including
racial discrimination, equal employment and telephone tapping |
8 (10.1%) |
| Primary industry |
7 (8.9%) |
| Taxation |
7 (8.9%) |
| Immigration |
5 (6.3%) |
| Education issues |
5 (6.3%) |
| Parliamentary entitlements |
4 (5.1%) |
| Media including media
ownership, broadcasting and television |
4 (5.1%) |
| Industrial relations |
3 (3.8%) |
| Telecommunications |
2 (2.5%) |
| Tariffs |
2 (2.5%) |
| Other: legalisation of
liquid nicotine (1), housing affordability (1) |
2 (2.5%) |
| Industry |
1 (1.3%) |
| Crime and criminal law |
1 (1.3%) |
| Customs issues |
1 (1.3%) |
| Foreign affairs including
continental shelf |
1 (1.3%) |
| Parliamentary issues: the
power of parliament, the power of the ministry, size of parliament etc |
1 (1.3%) |
| Health issues |
1 (1.3%) |
| Budget: appropriation
bills, financial statements |
1 (1.3%) |
| Bill or chamber procedural
issues |
1 (1.3%) |
| Total divisions |
79 |
The role of
the Senate
In his valedictory speech in the Senate in 2013, when he was
resigning to contest a seat in the House of Representatives, Barnaby Joyce
reflected on the role of the Senate and expressed disappointment that it was no
longer a states’ house:
... we are in a chamber that is supposed to
express the nation's freedom, and if we do not have it, then who does have it?
Where does that freedom reside? This is no longer, to be honest, a states'
house, but it should be. I thought it would be a states' house but it is not.
It is a house made up of party bodies. If it were a states' house we would sit
as states and not as political parties, so there must be other virtues to this
house.[57]
For Wright and Wood, state issues were
often the reason for their floor crossing. Wright fought to defeat any measure
that threatened the place of the Senate which, by extension, threatened the states’
sovereign rights. A determination to protect the states had been the prime
motivation for his opposition to the various constitutional referenda of the
1940s, expressed through his membership of the Australian Constitutional League.[58] Similarly, Wood believed
that the Senate existed to protect the states and operate as a house of review.
The review function, he suggested, empowered it to alter, and even negate,
government legislation.[59]
Wright believed that Senate authority should only be pressed
to the point of compelling a government to drop a major measure or go to an
election under special circumstances, mostly relating to issues of states’
rights. [60]
It has been suggested that Wright’s attempts
to deal with issues on states’ lines ‘were not really successful, mainly
because the issues involved were of marginal significance’.[61]
Wright and
Wood: views on dissent
Although Wright and Wood held similar views on the role of
the Senate, their approach to floor crossing was very different. In a newspaper
interview Senator Wright took exception to being called a rebel or a defector:
To call me a rebel shows a purblind lack of understanding of
what Parliament stands for. It is the duty of Ministers to support the
Government; it is the duty of ordinary members to speak, not for the
Government, but for the people. Anybody worth his salt as a Liberal would never
surrender his vote.[62]
In the same interview Senator Wood described their different
approaches to issues:
The difference between us is that Reg [Wright] is motivated
by the highest parliamentary principles ... My attitude is that I try to make a
common sense judgement—is it good for the country? Once I make a decision to
vote against a measure, I stick.[63]
When Wright was asked why he so often dropped his opposition
to a bill the second time round, he said:
The Senate is the House of Review and does not make or unmake
Governments ... You press it once or twice then bring it to decision.[64]
He was described by journalist Alan Reid as ‘ever ready to
wound but reluctant to slay’.[65]
This approach was evident in Wright’s decision to abstain
from the ‘vital vote on the resubmitted second reading of the sales tax bill’
which increased sales tax on motor vehicles from 30% to 40%.[66]
The Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Bill (No 2) 1960 had previously
been defeated at the second reading stage by a deadlocked Senate. Both Wright
and Wood voted with the Opposition. On the morning the vote in the Senate was
to be resubmitted a newspaper report suggested there could be preselection
problems for Wright and Wood, stating that the Government had ‘reaffirmed ... its
decision to use every procedure possible to have the bill passed by Parliament’
and that the two senators ‘faced the possibility of losing Liberal Party
endorsement when they seek re-election. They were warned ... of this risk if they
voted against the Government’.[67]
Whether or not this report influenced the senators is not clear. In the Senate
Wood reaffirmed his intention to oppose the bill in the resubmitted vote.[68]
Wright explained his decision to abstain on the resubmitted vote, although he
still opposed the increase in sales tax:
I belong to a party whose policy is to
preserve this Senate as an independent, responsible house of review, but, as
such, its authority should be pressed to the point of compelling a government
to drop a major measure or to go for election only for very special reasons ...
This sales tax measure belongs to a class in
which, in my view, the Government, supported by the House of Representatives,
is entitled to dominate ...
My outlook is that a deliberative vote in
the Senate demands a great sense of self discipline and an objective
interpretation of the constitutional relations between the two Houses. The
Senate is not a rubber stamp but, on the other hand, it is not a forum for
irresponsible obstruction to legislation of an elected government. One must
always be conscious of preserving a proper sense of the relationship of our
authority to that of the House of Representatives.
I therefore feel that as the Government,
with the support of the House of Representatives, is pressing its claim to have
this measure passed, it is proper to withdraw my vote from the division.[69]
On another occasion, when the House of Representatives
refused to accept a Senate amendment (moved by Wright) on the Land Tax
Assessment Bill 1952, Wright said ‘it’s time for me to be silent’.[70]
Senator Donald Grant (ALP, NSW) described him ‘as a 100 per
cent opportunist’.[71]
An analysis of votes cast by Wright in the Senate against
Liberal Governments from 1952 to 1967 suggested that Wright’s behaviour was not
unusual as:
There are few cases in Australian politics ... in which the
individual politician has been prepared to sacrifice himself for a matter of
principle, unless he has the prior assurance that he will be looked after.[72]
In a 1969 interview Wright said he believed
that his loyalty was owed more to the principles and policy of the party rather
than to its leadership.[73]
But he also claimed that:
Where the party is not in danger of
destruction you are obliged to register your disapproval ... When the trumps were
down there was never any vote of mine that put the Liberal Government in
jeopardy.[74]
This view is consistent with findings from a survey on
dissent in parliamentary democracies, which found that close votes result in
fewer defections, with ‘the odds of an MP defecting being almost 80% lower in
an extremely close vote than in a near-unanimous vote’.[75]
A more recent example of this view was the action of George Christensen (NP, Qld),
when he crossed the floor in 2017 on penalty rates. It was reported that he
crossed the floor ‘once it was clear the government had the numbers to win the
vote’.[76]
Divisions
initiated by floor crossers
In most cases MPs who crossed the floor did not initiate the
division concerned. Of the 295 MPs who crossed the floor only 39 (13.2%) moved
or initiated the ‘formal proposals’ (motions) to be debated and decided by the
relevant chamber.[77]
This happened in 125 (24.0%) of the 520 floor crossing divisions. No MP
initiated more than 40% of the divisions in which they crossed apart from Ian
Wilson (LIB, SA), who initiated the only division in which he crossed, and
De-Anne Kelly (NP, Qld) who initiated two of her three floor crossing divisions.
The two highest-frequency floor crossers, Senators Wright and Wood, were very
different in the number of divisions each initiated. Wright initiated 40% of
the 150 divisions in which he crossed but Wood initiated only 2.3% of the 130
divisions in which he crossed.
Table
17: Divisions initiated by floor crossers
| Initiating MPs |
Number of floor
crossing divisions |
Number (%) of
divisions initiated |
| Bate, Jeff (LIB, Vic.) |
5 |
1 (20.0%) |
| Senator Bernardi, Cory
(LIB, SA) |
6 |
1 (16.7%) |
| Burr, Max MP (LIB, Tas.) |
10 |
1 (10.0%) |
| Senator Buttfield, Nancy
(LIB, SA) |
6 |
1 (16.7%) |
| Cairns, Kevin MP (LIB, Qld) |
5 |
2 (40.0%) |
| Senator Crichton-Browne,
Noel (LIB, WA) |
10 |
1 (10.0%) |
| Drummond, Peter MP (LIB,
WA) |
3 |
1 (33.3%) |
| Fisher, Peter MP (NP, Qld) |
4 |
1 (25.0%) |
| Gorton, John Senator/MP
(LIB, Vic.) |
6 |
2 (33.3%) |
| Senator Greenwood, Ivor
(LIB, Vic.) |
10 |
1 (10.0%) |
| Hall, Steele MP (LIB, SA) |
5 |
1 (20.0%) |
| Hamer, David MP (LIB, Vic.) |
7 |
1 (14.3%) |
| Senator Hannan, George
(LIB, Vic.) |
5 |
1 (20.0%) |
| Senator Jessop, Don (LIB,
SA) |
27 |
1 (3.7%) |
| Joyce, Barnaby Senator/MP
(LIB, Qld, now NSW) |
28 |
8 (28.6%) |
| Kelly, De-Anne MP (NP, Qld) |
3 |
2 (66.7%) |
| Kent Hughes, Wilfred MP
(LIB, Vic.) |
8 |
1 (12.5%) |
| Killen, Jim MP (LIB, Qld) |
10 |
2 (20.0%) |
| Luck, Aubrey MP (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
1 (33.3%) |
| Senator Macdonald, Ian
(LIB,Qld) |
9 |
1 (11.1%) |
| Senator MacGibbon, David
(LIB, Qld) |
9 |
2 (22.2%) |
| Senator Martin (Sullivan),
Kathy (LIB, Qld) |
20 |
1 (5.0%) |
| McMahon, William MP (LIB,
NSW) |
8 |
1 (12.5%) |
| Senator Missen, Alan (LIB,
Vic.) |
41 |
5 (12.2%) |
| Senator O’Sullivan, Barry
(NP, Qld) |
8 |
2 (25.0%) |
| Pearce, Henry MP (LIB, Qld) |
4 |
1 (25.0%) |
| Senator Prowse, Edgar (NP,
WA) |
6 |
2 (33.3%) |
| Senator Puplick, Chris
(LIB, NSW) |
7 |
1 (14.3%) |
| Senator Rae, Peter (LIB,
Tas.) |
21 |
2 (9.5%) |
| Senator Seward, Harrie
(NP, WA) |
10 |
1 (10.0%) |
| Shack, Peter MP (LIB, WA) |
5 |
2 (40.0%) |
| Senator Townley, Michael
(LIB, Tas.) |
29 |
2 (6.9%) |
| Turnbull, Winton MP (NP,
Vic.) |
5 |
1 (20.0%) |
| Senator Vincent, Victor
(LIB, WA) |
6 |
1 (16.7%) |
| Wentworth, William MP (LIB,
NSW) |
31 |
5 (16.1%) |
| Senator Williams, John (NP,
NSW) |
13 |
1 (7.7%) |
| Wilson, Ian MP (LIB, SA) |
1 |
1 (100.0%) |
| Senator Wood, Ian (LIB,
Qld) |
130 |
3 (2.3%) |
| Senator Wright, Reg (LIB,
Tas.) |
150 |
60 (40.0%) |
| Total |
674 |
125 (18.5%) |
Floor
crossing when the Government had a majority in the Senate
During the period of the study three Liberal Prime Ministers—Robert
Menzies, Malcolm Fraser and John Howard—had a majority in the Senate on four
occasions. Table 18 below shows that each prime minister experienced increased
levels of floor crossings during these periods compared with the level of floor
crossing when their governments did not control the Senate. The percentage of
total floor crossing divisions in the Senate and the House of Representatives
when the government had a majority in the Senate is approximately double those
in the Senate when the government did not have control (6.0% and 2.9%) and
slightly less in the House of Representatives (2.1% and 1.3%).
In an interview in June 2005, former Prime Minister Malcom
Fraser was asked about criticism of his inaction during the period his
Government had a majority in the Senate (13.12.1975 to 30.6.1981) and whether
he could have used this majority to force through bigger changes. Fraser
responded:
A lot of the things that people wished I’d forced through weren’t
on the political agenda in those days and secondly something which I was not
particularly concerned about—I had a number of senators who were independently
minded. They were concerned about the role of the Senate, they were concerned
about Senate enquiries, they had to be persuaded that the Government was right.
People like Reg Wright from Tasmania or Alan Missen [Vic.] and they’re only two
so technically there was a majority but it wasn’t an automatic majority.[78]
Although Fraser experienced high levels of floor crossing,
the Coalition had workable majorities in the Senate from 1975 to June 1981.[79]
As such, in votes on some issues, the actions of a number of independent-minded
Liberal senators made this majority much less certain.[80]
Senator Austin Lewis (LIB, Vic.) provided an eyewitness account
of behaviour in the party room during Fraser’s term as Prime Minister. Speaking
during a condolence motion for his friend Ian Wood, Lewis, who did not approve
of crossing the floor ‘very much’, described his first party room meeting in late
1976:
... three older gentlemen stood up and gave Malcom Fraser [then
Prime Minister] one of the greatest serves I had ever heard about some issue
that was before the meeting. I thought, ‘What on earth is going on here?’ The
first fellow was Sir Reginald Wright; I did recognise him. The second fellow
was Bill Wentworth [LIB, NSW]. The third person was a bloke I had never seen
before, but it turned out to be Woody [Ian Wood, LIB, Qld]. They really did not
mess around. [81]
Table
18: Floor crossings during periods of government majorities in the Senate
| |
Senate |
House of Representatives |
Total |
| Prime Minister and periods of Senate majorities |
Total divisions |
Number (%) floor crossing divisions |
Total divisions |
Number (%) floor crossing divisions |
Total divisions |
Number (%) floor crossing divisions |
| Menzies (28.4.1951-30.6.1956) |
334 |
17 (5.1%) |
868 |
18 (2.1%) |
1,202 |
35 (2.9%) |
| Menzies (1.7.1959-30.6.1962) |
170 |
25 (14.7%) |
411 |
12 (2.9%) |
581 |
37 (6.4%) |
| Fraser (13.12.1975-30.6.1981) |
524 |
39 (7.4%) |
962 |
17 (1.8%) |
1,486 |
66 (4.4%) |
| Howard (1.7.2005-30.6.2008) |
719 |
23 (3.2%) |
463 |
10 (2.2%) |
1,182 |
33 (2.8%) |
| Total (Senate majority) |
1,747 |
104 (6.0%) |
2,704 |
57 (2.1%) |
4,451 |
171 (3.8%) |
| Total (no Senate majority) |
8,557 |
249 (2.9%) |
7,367 |
97 (1.3%) |
15,930 |
349 (2.2%) |
| Total |
10,304 |
353 (3.4%) |
10,071 |
164 (1.6%) |
20,381(a) |
520(b) (2.6%) |
(a) Includes 6 divisions in the Joint Sitting of Parliament
on 6 and 7 August 1974.
(b) Includes one floor crossing division in the Joint
Sitting of Parliament.
Floor
crossings by parliament and year
Table 21 (Appendix 1) lists the number of floor crossing
divisions and floor crossings by parliament. Two Parliaments, the 39th and
40th, did not record any floor crossings.
The table supports research conducted by UK academic Philip
Cowley which shows that:
Discontent builds up over time within a governing party, so
governments born out of a period in opposition usually see lower levels of
rebellion than those that have been returned for multiple terms.[82]
Although federal parliamentary terms are only a maximum of three
years, it is evident that the number of floor crossings that occurred under the
Menzies, Holt, Fraser and Howard Coalition governments generally increased as
they were re-elected for multiple terms.
Table 22 (Appendix 1), floor crossing divisions and floor
crossings by year, also shows that, in general, floor crossings declined in an
election year and increased in the years following a general election. A recent
academic study found that MPs were more likely to cross the floor the further away
an election, and estimated that ‘each year ... removed from an election makes the
odds of an MP defecting 4% greater’.[83]
Effect of
floor crossing on the result of divisions
Floor crossing does not, generally, influence the outcome of
a division but on some occasions floor crossers have been successful in
obtaining the result (a motion passed or negatived) they desired. Floor
crossing affected the result of floor crossing divisions in only 55 (10.6%) of
cases. The vast majority of these occurred in the Senate: 50 (91.0%) compared
to five (9.0%) in the House of Representatives. Senate divisions where floor
crossers made a difference represented 14.2% of all Senate floor crossing
divisions compared with 3.0% of House of Representatives divisions. The floor
crossing divisions that made a difference in the House of Representatives all
occurred between 1952 and 1955.
The last division in the Senate where crossing the floor
made a difference involved then Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce crossing the
floor in 2005 to vote with the Labor Opposition, the Australian Democrats,
Australian Greens and Family First Party. He supported a Democrat amendment
opposing schedule 1 (dealing with merger clearance and authorisations) of the
Trade Practices Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2005. The question put was
that ‘schedule 1, as amended, be agreed to’. The vote was tied and the question
was therefore negatived.[84]
At the time the Age reported that the Government was ‘deeply worried
because it saw Joyce as part of a trap laid for it’ and the tactics used as a
‘sting’ by Joyce and his opposition cohorts’.[85]
The House of Representatives did not accept the amendment and, as a result, the
final form of the Bill was not affected by Joyce’s floor crossing.
Both the 2004 and the current study considered the effect of
crossing the floor on the final outcome of bills, amendments to bills,
regulations and substantive motions. They did not include the final effect on
procedural matters. The findings show that the symbolic impact of floor
crossing is usually far greater than the practical effect. When the legislative
process is followed to its conclusion the influence of floor crossers is seen
only in the Senate and the results are the same in both studies.
As a direct result of floor crossing in the Senate:
- two bills became acts: Representation Bill 1983 and ACT Evidence
(Temporary Provisions) Bill 1971
- 14 amendments supported or moved by floor crossers were included
in bills that became acts
- four disallowance motions on regulations or ordinances supported
or moved by floor crossers were passed and
- four motions relating to the establishment of Senate committees
were passed.
No current members of parliament were involved in these
divisions.
Threat to
cross the floor
Although the number of floor crossing
divisions has declined since 2004, individual MPs are still using threats to
cross the floor to negotiate support for policy issues important to their
constituents. On some occasions these threats achieve the desired result.
In late 2017, when Prime Minister Malcolm
Turnbull was rejecting calls to establish a Royal Commission into the banking
industry, media reports suggested that Nationals Senator Barry O’Sullivan (Qld)
had gained sufficient numbers in the Senate to pass his private senator’s bill
establishing a parliamentary commission of inquiry into the banking industry.[86] In the House of
Representatives, Nationals members George Christensen (Qld) and Llew O’Brien (Qld)
indicated they were prepared to cross the floor to support the O’Sullivan bill,
an act that would have led to a government defeat in the lower House.[87] The intense pressure on
Llew O’Brien to withdraw his support for the O’Sullivan bill was described by
journalist Adele Ferguson:
Turnbull was now in very real danger of
being defeated in the lower house. By the time he called O’Brien on 27 November
[2017], it was too late. ‘Malcolm pointed out how significant a move it was,
particularly for a first-term MP’ ... But O’Brien had heard all the arguments
about the risks to the economy, how it would undermine the country
internationally and how expensive it would be.[88]
Ferguson also reported that ‘[Scott]
Morrison [then Treasurer] and [Kelly] O’Dwyer [then Minister for Revenue and
Financial Services] pulled out all stops to get O’Sullivan and O’Brien to
change their minds’.[89]
The media observed that:
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and Treasurer
Scott Morrison appear to have become hostages to rebel Nationals determined at
all costs to secure a commission of inquiry into the banks.[90]
On 30 November 2017 Turnbull and Morrison
announced the establishment of the Banking Royal Commission.[91]
Nationals member George Christensen (Qld) has threatened to
cross the floor on a range of issues: the banking royal commission, penalty
rates, energy policy (see Barnaby Joyce’s views on energy policy in the paragraph
below), superannuation and payday lending.[92]
He has reportedly called for the end of the Coalition and threatened to leave
the Coalition if action wasn’t taken on a mandatory code of conduct for the
sugar industry.[93] Christensen has
crossed the floor on two occasions—on penalty rates and an amendment to the
Minerals Resource Rent Tax Bill 2011.
On some occasions an MP will reserve the option of crossing
the floor to oppose a party position on condition that the party supports
his/her issue. In August 2018 it was reported that Barnaby Joyce had stated that
he would support the ‘Turnbull government’s National Energy Guarantee on
condition that it creates a Plan B to cut electricity prices in case the NEG
doesn’t work as promised’.[94]
In early 2019 the Nationals indicated support for Labor amendments to the
Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 measures No. 5) Bill 2018.[95]
The amendments dealt with small business access to justice. Although there was
no division, ‘[a]ll Government senators, by leave, recorded
their votes for the noes’, and the Morrison Government did not oppose
the amendments when the Bill returned to the House of Representatives.[96]
A journalist observed that:
The Liberals and Nationals frequently clash on questions of
competition law, particularly measures to tackle the market power of banks, big
energy companies and Australia’s grocery duopoly.[97]
Effect of
floor crossing on an MP’s career
Commentators have noted how career limiting crossing the
floor can be, with one journalist observing in 2001 that ‘[c]rossing the floor
has never been a career enhancing move. Yet Liberal members did it regularly,
particularly in the Senate’.[98]
Other observers acknowledge that the act can bring ‘hero’ status to the floor
crosser.[99]
Former Liberal minister and senator Fred Chaney (WA) has suggested that
‘[c]rossing the floor is the stuff of which parliamentary heroes are made’ but
Chaney also believed that the act was generally ‘not all that principled’. [100]
Another former Coalition minister and senator, Nigel Scullion (CLP, NT)
believed that ‘it’s not a career move ... but ... at the end of the day you’ve got
to represent those people who put you there’.[101]
The recent Westminster study noted above suggested that:
‘[d]issent is not a strategy that MPs
can employ with too much regularity. There are real costs associated with
dissent for both the party and the MP. For the party, mass dissent is
embarrassing. It can water down the party’s message, potentially costing it
votes at election time. For governing parties, mass dissent can jeopardize the
party’s legislative program and even potentially lead a government to collapse.
For the dissenting MP, at the extreme, the party leadership could remove the
whip, kicking the MP out of the parliamentary party, or revoke support at
election time ... MPs must carefully weigh the benefits of dissent against the
costs and only rebel when they are able to fully exploit the electoral
advantages of taking a stand that contradicts their party's main message.[102]
In the federal parliament, dissent has declined since the
2004 study, but the act of crossing the floor still does not appear to have
adversely affected the careers of many floor crossers.[103]
In the present study 12 of the 17 current MPs who have crossed the floor have
become ministers or parliamentary secretaries.
A 2017 study of European parliamentary democracies considered
the effect of floor crossing on MPs’ parliamentary careers. It found that in
these democracies, ‘where committees are stronger’ than those in Westminster
systems and influence on public policy can be achieved through committee
service, ‘MPs are more concerned about maintaining their party in power and
influencing legislation than they are about their individual incentives to
cultivate a personal vote’.[104]
The authors suggested that this may be different in
Westminster systems where ‘there the agenda is strongly centralised under the
control of the government’ and ‘being a member of government is all-important
for MPs who are policy oriented.’[105]
Some floor crossers, such as Senator Reg Wright who crossed
150 times and current MP Barnaby Joyce (28 times) would both go on to become
ministers—in Joyce’s case leader of the Nationals and Deputy Prime Minister
(DPM). Joyce told the Senate in 2013 that floor crossing had not destroyed his
political career:
It would also have been better if we were
not so reticent about people having a difference as to whether they cross the
floor. In my time in this chamber I think I have done it 28 times. It has not
destroyed my political career. I hope I was never self-indulgent or selfish in
that. I hope it gave the Australian people at times a sense that there is
independence of thought, you can express it and, if the issue is correct, you
should do it. It is obligatory for you to do it.[106]
Other MPs have not been so fortunate. In a newspaper article
in 2005, former Liberal minister Ian Macphee (Vic.) wrote about the fate of MPs
who crossed the floor in 1988 to support the Hawke Government’s motion on a
non-discriminatory immigration policy.[107]
He said:
When most of us lost our party preselection the following
year there was sufficient rage for Howard to lose his leadership. Later he
acknowledged that his departure from the united immigration policy was wrong.
That did not retrieve shattered careers.[108]
There were periods when Wright did not cross the floor: from
February 1950 to March 1951 when he held the position of Government Whip in the
Senate, and from February 1968 to December 1972 when he held the position of
Minister for Works in the Gorton and McMahon Governments. When Prime Minister
Gorton made Wright a minister his attitude to floor crossing changed:
[his] party loyalty was now impeccable, for he saw his first
responsibility as being to the government rather than to the Senate. He ceased
his floor crossings ... He remained a minister until the McMahon
Government’s defeat in 1972. In 1973 he again started to cross the floor. [109]
More recently George Christensen, who held the positions of
the Nationals party whip (17 October 2013 to 9 May 2016) and chief whip (20
June 2016 to 28 February 2017) was reported as saying that he had resigned from
the position of chief whip because ‘his “constant outspokenness” meant ... [his]
position was untenable’.[110]
Like Wright, Christensen did not cross the floor during the periods he was
whip.
Although he was never a minister, Ian Wood was a member of
the Senate Regulations and Ordinances Committee for more than 28 years and for
more than 25 of these years he was the Chair of the Committee. The Sydney
Morning Herald reported in 1967 that, when offered a ministerial position,
Wood had told Prime Minister Menzies ‘I don’t want a portfolio, so I don’t have
to worry about you and you don’t have to worry about me’.[111]
Journalist Alan Reid described Wood as being beyond action
from his party:
The establishment within the Federal Parliamentary Liberal
party would have dearly liked to have disposed of Wood and to have taken away
his Liberal preselection as a Queensland senator. But he was too strongly
entrenched in his native state for them to take that risk; he would almost
certainly have held his Senate position as an independent and without Liberal
endorsement. So they left him alone.[112]
Effect of floor crossing on becoming party leader
Floor crossing by Liberal and Nationals MPs does not appear
to have had an influence on their chances of being elected party leader by their
parliamentary party. Table 19 below shows that four Liberal MPs crossed the
floor before becoming prime minister, with two of these also crossing the floor
after they ceased to be PM. One Liberal MP, Andrew Peacock (Vic.) became
Opposition Leader after crossing the floor.[113]
Seven National Party leaders crossed the floor before becoming party leader (of
whom five became deputy Prime Minister), with one MP, Warren Truss (NP, Qld)
crossing twice as leader of the Nationals. Two MPs, Doug Anthony (NP, NSW) and
Mark Vaile (NP, NSW) also crossed after they ceased to be leader (see table 20
below).[114]
No Labor Party leaders have crossed the floor before or after becoming leader.[115]
Table
19: Liberal MPs who have crossed the floor before or after their period as
party leader
MP
Period of service as leader |
Highest office (PM or
Opposition Leader) |
Number of floor
crossings before period as PM/Opposition Leader |
Number of floor
crossings after period as PM/Opposition Leader |
Harold Holt (LIB, Vic.)(a)
26.1.1966–19.12.1967 |
PM |
1 |
|
John Gorton (LIB, Vic.)(a)
10.1.1968–10.3.1971 |
PM |
4 |
2 |
William McMahon (LIB, NSW)(a)
10.3.1971–5.12.1972 |
PM |
2 |
6 |
Andrew Peacock (LIB, Vic.)(a)
11.3.1983–5.9.1985 and 9.5.1989–3.4.1990 |
Opposition leader |
1 |
|
Malcolm Turnbull (LIB,
NSW)
16.9.2008–1.12.2009 and 15.9.2015–24.8.2018 |
Opposition leader and PM |
1(b) |
|
- These
leaders were also deputy Liberal leaders.
- Turnbull
crossed the floor after his period as Opposition leader and before his term as
PM.
Note: Prime Minister Tony Abbott (LIB, NSW) did not cross
the floor but on 22 June 2009 abstained from voting in two divisions on the
‘alcopops’ legislation.
Table
20: National Party MPs who have crossed the floor before, during or after their
period as party leader
MP
Period of service as leader |
Highest office (DPM or
leader in opposition) |
Floor crossings before
period as DPM/Leader |
Floor crossings during
period as DPM/ Leader |
Floor crossings after
period as DPM/Leader |
John McEwen (NP, Vic.)(a)
26.3.1958–1.2.1971 |
DPM(b) |
1 |
|
|
Doug Anthony (NP, NSW)(a)
2.2.1971–17.1.1984 |
DPM & NP leader |
1 |
|
1 |
Ian Sinclair (NP, NSW)(a)
17.1.1984–9.5.1989 |
NP leader |
1 |
|
|
Mark Vaile (NP, NSW)(a)
23.6.2005–3.12.2007 |
DPM & NP leader |
|
|
2 |
| Warren Truss (NP, Qld)(a)
3.12.2007–12.2.2016 |
DPM & NP leader |
1 |
2(c) |
|
Barnaby Joyce (NP, NSW)(a)
12.2.2016–27.10.2017
6.12.2017–26.2.2018 |
DPM |
28 |
|
|
Michael McCormack (NP,
NSW)
26.2.2018– |
DPM |
1 |
|
|
- These
leaders were also deputy Nationals leaders.
- McEwen
was appointed Prime Minister 19.12.1967–10.1.1968 following Harold Holt’s death
on 19.12.1967.
- Truss crossed the floor when he was NP leader.
Attitude of
party leaders and colleagues to floor crossing
A 2018 study of four European parliaments and the UK
Parliament considered the use of disciplinary measures by party leaders to
impose party unity. The study suggested that leaders use ‘various instruments’
encompassing ‘threats or promises’.[116]
Sometimes a party leader will signal publicly that there
won’t be retaliation against floor crossers. On 2 December 2009 Liberal
Senators Sue Boyce (Qld) and Judith Troeth (Vic.) voted with the Labor
Government at the third reading stage of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme
Bill 2009 [No. 2] and 10 related bills. The Bills were defeated.[117]
Boyce had previously told the Senate that ‘I am acting in what I believe is good
faith’.[118]
The media reported the new leader of the Opposition, Tony Abbott, as saying ‘I
respect what senators Troeth and Boyce did. There will be no recriminations’.[119]
On another occasion, when Boyce crossed the floor on a
same-sex marriage bill introduced by the Australian Greens, then Opposition
Leader Abbott said he would not be counselling her and added because ‘[w]e are
not a Stalinist party. We never have been, we never will be.’[120]
It was reported that, when the preselection of former
Liberal minister and ‘dissident MP’ Judi Moylan (WA) was challenged in 2006,
Prime Minister John Howard said:
I will be suggesting, if I'm asked, to the Liberal
preselectors, say, in the electorate of Pearce [Moylan’s electorate], to take
the range of contributions of Judi Moylan into account.
I have said I see no merit, and I will not be seeking within the
ranks of the Liberal Party organisation, the exaction of any kind of vengeance.
Nothing is achieved by that.[121]
While Moylan survived the challenge to her preselection,
journalist Laura Tingle suggested that Howard:
... has not silenced those in the party who have savagely
attacked her [Moylan], or threatened her preselection.
Equally, they will have noticed that those who did dare to
dissent on asylum seekers have already been subjected to other forms of punishment.
For example, none of those who dissented or abstained have taken their regular
place in question time as askers of "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which
give backbenchers an opportunity to get their mugs on television.[122]
Senior party members can also play a role when a new
backbench MP threatens to vote against the party line on a critical issue. This
situation occurred when Barnaby Joyce’s term as a newly elected senator began
on 1 July 2005 and he announced that he was considering voting against the
Coalition Government’s bills on the sale of Telstra. This move was interpreted
by the media as a civil war erupting inside the Nationals, jeopardising John
Howard’s Senate majority and his Government’s fourth-term agenda.[123]
Senior Nationals MP and Whip in the Lower House, Ian Causley (NSW), reacted
angrily to Joyce’s implied threats, saying that ‘[i]f he wants to cross the
floor, then he doesn’t belong in the National Party much longer’.[124]
The Telstra (Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2005 and
related bills passed all stages in the Senate on 14 September 2005. Joyce voted
with the Government in all divisions.[125]
Although the examples listed above suggest that Liberal
Party leaders tolerate floor crossing this is not always the case. Menzies often
had to deal with dissidents on his backbench but did not always tolerate their
behaviour. In 1955, after a disagreement with William Wentworth (LIB, NSW) on
the administration of civil defence Menzies called a special party meeting:
... where he appealed for unity and made it clear that if ...
[Wentworth’s] motion was proceeded with and supported by the House, he would
consider it as a vote of censure necessitating the resignation of his
Government.[126]
Following the disagreement with Wentworth, Menzies held a
press conference where he set out his view of dissent, a view similar to that
of Wright’s:
The Government must be in charge of the business of the House
...
My position as Leader of a Government would be intolerable if
I had to exist at the whim of one or two or five persons and I don’t propose to
live so precariously as that.[127]
Reg Wright’s voting behaviour has been described as ‘a
phenomenon which could not reoccur’ and, although it accommodated Wright’s
floor crossing, the Liberal Party was warned to ‘take good care to see that it
was never placed in such a position again’.[128]
Occasionally leaders have even—reportedly—felt the need to
resort to physical pressure to restrain colleagues from crossing the floor. It
was reported that when former federal MP Steele Hall (LIB, SA), was a young state
SA backbencher, he backed the state Labor Government’s legislation for the
introduction of a lottery. Former SA Liberal Premier Sir Thomas Playford tried
to physically stop Hall from crossing the floor.[129]
In 2019, former Liberal senator and Cabinet minister, Amanda
Vanstone (LIB, SA) said on ABC radio that she was ‘sorry the Liberal Party
seems to have moved away from tolerating crossing the floor’.[130]
Vanstone crossed the floor in 1986, in protest over the Labor Government’s
decision to increase the sales tax on wine and the effect this move would have
on the wine industry in South Australia.[131]
She noted that then Opposition leader John Howard was ‘furious’ and there were
attempts to stop her crossing the floor.[132]
Although she described floor crossing as a ‘career limiting move’, Vanstone
believed she ‘ended up in Cabinet’ because Howard thought ‘she’s tough enough
to last’.[133]
In 2016 the Nationals’ attitude to floor crossing was outlined
by Barnaby Joyce, then Leader of the Party:
Within the National Party, more than any
other party, we say, 'If you really wish to cross the floor, you can; if you
really wish to express a different view, you can; you just have to put some
cogency into your reasons as to why.'[134]
The decision to dissent usually rests
solely with the MP but commentators have suggested that in some cases, although
party leaders on the whole attempt to avoid rebellion, they ‘could coordinate
rebellious acts’.[135]
Circumstances similar to those described by the Westminster study occurred in
the Senate in 2016 on a motion to disallow a Customs regulation that banned the
importation of the Adler shotgun. Two Nationals backbenchers crossed the floor
to support the motion (moved by Liberal Democrat Senator David Leyonhjelm (NSW)),
and two Nationals ministers and one backbencher reportedly abstained from the
vote.[136]
The motion was defeated. A newspaper report suggested that:
Sources said the decision by the Senators to
cross the floor was announced to the Nationals party room meeting earlier on
Monday morning. The move came after the Nationals suffered the biggest swing in
political history to lose the heartland state seat of Orange in NSW to the
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party.[137]
Influence of
state and local party branches
A number of MPs have not suffered negative consequences from
floor crossing due to the support of their state or local party branches. Fred Chaney
observed that ‘I very seldom saw anyone cross the floor against the wishes of
their endorsing body’.[138]
David Hamer (LIB, Vic.), senator in the Fraser years, had a similar view:
None of the cross voters was penalised by loss of selection
as the Liberal candidate in the next election ... in some cases their position
was strengthened, for they were representing the views of the party
organisations in their states, which were opposed to what the federal
government was proposing ... Nor was any action taken by the parliamentary
party. None of the cross voters was expelled or publicly criticised in the
party room. Five of the cross voters later became ministers.[139]
Tony Crook (NP, WA) was backed by WA Nationals in his
support for the Labor Government’s Wheat Export Marketing Amendment Bill 2012
which aimed to complete the deregulation of the industry.[140]
Most wheat farmers in WA also supported deregulation.[141] In fact the WA Nationals
had pledged ‘to separate themselves from the Coalition unless some key
undertakings were met’.[142]
In 1988 the Labor member for Kalgoorlie, Graeme Campbell
(ALP, WA), crossed the floor to vote against the Hawke Government’s Taxation
Laws Amendment Bill (No. 5) 1988 which sought to introduce a gold tax. All WA’s
gold mining areas were located in the electorate of Kalgoorlie and Campbell
claimed he had no choice but to represent the views of his electorate.[143]
But Campbell also had ‘a long history of disputes with his own side of
politics’ on other issues.[144]
In November 1995 the ALP withdrew his endorsement as a candidate for the next
election. Campbell sat as an Independent until he was defeated at the 1998
election.
Some issues can cause complications for both major parties
and/or members from particular jurisdictions. The location of a radioactive
waste dump is one example. In March 2010, in the debate in the House of
Representatives on the Labor Government’s National Radioactive
Waste Management Bill 2010, Damien Hale (ALP, NT) advised the House that he
would not vote for the bill which proposed a nuclear waste dump at Muckaty
Station in the Northern Territory:
I have been on the public record as opposing
a nuclear dump in the Northern Territory since my preselection and that will
remain my position.[145]
The Bill passed the House of
Representatives without division at the second or third reading stages. Hale
did not ask that his name be recorded as opposing the Bill.[146] The Senate had not
debated the Bill when the Parliament was dissolved in July 2010.
When the Bill was debated in the 43rd
Parliament, Natasha Griggs (CLP, NT) had replaced Damien Hale as the member for
Solomon, and she followed the views of NT constituents and crossed the floor to
vote against the Bill at the second reading stage.[147] There was no division at
the third reading stage and the Bill passed the House of Representatives.[148]
There can be risks in defying party instructions on how to
vote on a particular issue. In 2001, the power of the CLP was evident when the
party disendorsed former Northern Territory CLP Senator Grant Tambling for
voting to impose restrictions on online gambling rather than crossing the floor
as instructed by the CLP to vote against the Coalition government.[149]
Alternative
ways of managing dissent
In 1994 Fred Chaney suggested a way of dealing with the
strict party discipline operating in the Parliament. He proposed, in effect, that
parties grant their members a conscience vote in certain circumstances:
... at least on technical and non-policy amendments to
legislation, members should be allowed to exercise personal judgement, as they
should when serving on parliamentary committees.[150]
This view is supported by the results in Table 14 above, which
shows that the largest category of floor crossings by subject (some 25%) was
that of procedural issues in relation to bills or chamber proceedings.
The UK Parliament has dealt with dissent in a different way
and has ‘[a]n essential mechanism for ensuring that backbenchers attend and go
through the correct division lobbies at important votes’ and party unity is
maintained.[151]
This is the document known as ‘the Whip’ which is circulated weekly by each party
whip to their own members listing the business for the coming week and indicating
its importance by the number of times the item is underlined – one, two or
three times.[152]
The meaning of the underlining is described in the following way:
Single line whips are a general guide to the party decision,
but non-binding, and primarily for notification. Two-line whips, also known as
double-line whips, are stricter instructions to attend and vote, are
considerably more binding, and attendance is typically required.
Finally, three-line whips are the most extreme of their kind,
typically only for key issues, such as second readings of important Bills and
motions of no confidence. Breach of instruction to attend and vote typically
has serious consequences. Ignoring or voting against a three-line whip is
usually seen as a rebellion against the party, and could result in disciplinary
action such as party suspension or expulsion.[153]
In recent times there have been substantial rebellions in
the House of Commons, with the largest occurring on 16 January 2019 when 118 Conservative MPs voted against the then Prime Minister Theresa
May’s Brexit withdrawal agreement. The Government was defeated by 432 to 202
votes, a majority of 230.[154]
The UK concept of ‘whipping’ was raised by
Chris Bowen (ALP, NSW) as one of the ways to modernise the ALP and allow more
independence for Labor MPs after the party’s election loss in 2013.[155] Bowen noted that the ALP
has traditionally believed in strong caucus discipline but also suggested that,
despite the Liberal Party’s official position of allowing MPs to cross the
floor, the Party has similar levels of discipline and ‘the phenomenon of a
member of parliament crossing the floor is particularly rare’.[156] Bowen believed this
level of party discipline would be unacceptable in most comparable countries.
He argues that the ALP needs ‘to show the community that Labor MPs can take up
issues and argue them publicly with dedication and a degree of independence’.[157]
The UK’s ‘whipping’ method of voting still allows
parliamentary parties to exercise strong control over rebellious MPs. In the House
of Commons vote, on 3 September 2019, that resulted in Prime Minister Boris
Johnson losing control of the parliamentary agenda, 21 Conservative MPs crossed
the floor to vote with a cross-party alliance. This act resulted in the ‘removal
of the whip’ from the 21 Conservative MPs.[158]
This means that the MP is expelled from the party and sits as an
independent but ‘can be brought back into the party fold if it decides to
restore the whip’.[159]
The removal of the whip is ‘one of the most serious
disciplinary actions that can be taken against an MP by a party’.[160]
The chairman of the Conservative Party, James
Cleverly MP, tweeted:
It is a very long-standing convention that an
MP who votes to remove executive power from their own government and hand it to
the opposition has the party whip removed.[161]
Conclusion
The study shows that dissent within the three major parties
as measured by the extent of floor crossing is now more tightly controlled by all
parties than it was in previous decades. This is very different to the
situation in the UK House of Commons where ‘over the last 50 years [there] has
been the rise of backbench dissent. MPs are increasingly willing to vote
against their party line’.[162]
Although dissent has declined since the 2004 study, other
results have not changed. The current results confirm that when a Coalition
government holds a majority in the Senate the level of floor crossing increases
and Coalition MPs are more likely to cross the floor in government than
opposition. Since the 2004 study only one floor crossing has altered the
outcome of a vote (in the Senate) but not to the final form of the bill concerned,
and the effect of crossing the floor ‘still remains largely symbolic’.[163]
The basic options for the major parties in relation to floor
crossing also have not changed: parties can either allow more independence for
their MPs, or continue to support the position reportedly expressed by a former
senior Nationals MP who said ‘he always kept dissent inside the party room and
that a breakdown in the doctrine of majority rules left only a rabble’.[164]
Fred Chaney’s impression in 1994 was that ‘... individual
stands are rarer now and ... there is a different style of person being elected
to the Parliament’.[165]
But there will always be circumstances where MPs feel they must follow their
conscience and principles rather than accept party discipline. Liberal backbencher,
Russell Broadbent (Vic.), who has crossed the floor on three occasions,
described these situations:
This job can be challenging. I have been in
a position where I have been opposed to my own party at different times. These
issues are normally resolved in our party room; at other times they become more
public. What are our responsibilities? I know I've got a responsibility to the
people who put me in the place—the electors of Monash and my party ... And I have
a responsibility also to the party room, which is quite separate from that
again, which may have a different view to what my party members might decide is
the right thing to do. And, over and above that, I have a responsibility to
this parliament and the people of Australia.
Can I act every time on my conscience, my
compassion and my heart over what my head wants to do? No, I can't. There are
issues deserving consideration where the head must rule over the heart, because
that's what the nation deserves ... More importantly, and over and above all
those things, I offer my electorate, my party, my party room and the people of
Australia my judgement on an issue ...[166]
Appendix 1: Floor
crossings by parliament and year
Table
21: Floor crossing divisions and floor crossings for both chambers by
parliament
Shading indicates Parliaments where the government gained a
majority in the Senate.
Parliament number
(Government) |
Opening
date |
Closing date |
Number of floor
crossing divisions |
Number of floor
crossings |
| 19th (Coalition) |
22.2.50 |
16.3.51 |
0 |
0 |
| 20th (Coalition) |
12.6.51 |
14.4.54 |
18 |
92 |
| 21st (Coalition) |
04.8.54 |
28.10.55 |
11 |
86 |
| 22nd (Coalition) |
15.2.56 |
02.10.58 |
25 |
68 |
| 23rd (Coalition) |
17.2.59 |
27.10.61 |
50 |
109 |
| 24th (Coalition) |
20.2.62 |
30.10.63 |
19 |
28 |
| 25th (Coalition) |
25.2.64 |
28.10.66 |
53 |
123 |
| 26th (Coalition) |
21.2.67 |
26.9.69 |
46 |
117 |
| 27th (Coalition) |
25.11.69 |
31.10.72 |
45 |
82 |
| 28th (ALP) |
27.2.73 |
10.4.74 |
5 |
18 |
| 29th (ALP) |
09.7.74 |
11.11.75 |
4 |
17 |
| 30th (Coalition) |
17.2.76 |
09.11.77 |
24 |
127 |
| 31st (Coalition) |
21.2.78 |
18.9.80 |
34 |
98 |
| 32nd (Coalition) |
25.11.80 |
16.12.82 |
53 |
185 |
| 33rd (ALP) |
21.4.83 |
24.10.84 |
17 |
77 |
| 34th (ALP) |
21.2.85 |
05.6.87 |
6 |
12 |
| 35th (ALP) |
14.9.87 |
22.12.89 |
15 |
36 |
| 36th (ALP) |
08.5.90 |
18.12.92 |
3 |
10 |
| 37th (ALP) |
04.5.93 |
30.11.95 |
4 |
16 |
| 38th (Coalition) |
30.4.96 |
15.7.98 |
9 |
15 |
| 39th (Coalition) |
10.11.98 |
08.10.01 |
0 |
0 |
| 40th (Coalition) |
12.2.02 |
30.8.04 |
0 |
0 |
| 41st (Coalition) |
16.11.04 |
15.10.07 |
27 |
31 |
| 42nd (ALP) |
12.2.08 |
19.7.10 |
20 |
116 |
| 43rd (ALP) |
28.9.10 |
12.8.13 |
11 |
14 |
| 44th (Coalition) |
12.11.13 |
09.5.16 |
6 |
12 |
| 45th (Coalition) |
30.8.16 |
11.4.19 |
15 |
30 |
| Total |
|
|
520 |
1,519 |
Table 22: Floor crossing divisions
and floor crossings by year
Shading indicates the years in which elections were held for
the House of Representatives and half the Senate. Double dissolution election
years are bolded.
| Year |
Floor crossing
divisions |
Floor crossings |
| 1950 |
0 |
0 |
| 1951 |
1 |
2 |
| 1952 |
15 |
71 |
| 1953(b) |
2 |
19 |
| 1954(a) |
6 |
31 |
| 1955 |
5 |
55 |
| 1956 |
11 |
23 |
| 1957 |
9 |
37 |
| 1958 |
5 |
8 |
| 1959 |
21 |
46 |
| 1960 |
18 |
47 |
| 1961 |
11 |
16 |
| 1962 |
7 |
13 |
| 1963(a) |
12 |
15 |
| 1964(b) |
10 |
21 |
| 1965 |
31 |
87 |
| 1966(a) |
12 |
15 |
| 1967(b) |
20 |
38 |
| 1968 |
14 |
42 |
| 1969(a) |
12 |
37 |
| 1970(b) |
24 |
48 |
| 1971 |
14 |
24 |
| 1972(a) |
7 |
10 |
| 1973 |
5 |
18 |
| 1974 |
1 |
1 |
| 1975 |
3 |
16 |
| 1976 |
3 |
13 |
| 1977 |
21 |
114 |
| 1978 |
14 |
32 |
| 1979 |
11 |
30 |
| 1980 |
9 |
36 |
| 1981 |
16 |
52 |
| 1982 |
37 |
133 |
| 1983 |
17 |
77 |
| 1984 |
0 |
0 |
| 1985 |
1 |
1 |
| 1986 |
3 |
3 |
| 1987 |
2 |
8 |
| 1988 |
6 |
8 |
| 1989 |
9 |
28 |
| 1990 |
2 |
8 |
| 1991 |
1 |
2 |
| 1992 |
0 |
0 |
| 1993 |
2 |
6 |
| 1994 |
2 |
10 |
| 1995 |
0 |
0 |
| 1996 |
1 |
1 |
| 1997 |
8 |
14 |
| 1998 |
0 |
0 |
| 1999 |
0 |
0 |
| 2000 |
0 |
0 |
| 2001 |
0 |
0 |
| 2002 |
0 |
0 |
| 2003 |
0 |
0 |
| 2004 |
0 |
0 |
| 2005 |
8 |
8 |
| 2006 |
17 |
21 |
| 2007 |
2 |
2 |
| 2008 |
8 |
37 |
| 2009 |
11 |
78 |
| 2010 |
1 |
1 |
| 2011 |
2 |
2 |
| 2012 |
7 |
10 |
| 2013 |
2 |
2 |
| 2014 |
1 |
1 |
| 2015 |
5 |
11 |
| 2016 |
1 |
2 |
| 2017 |
6 |
10 |
| 2018 |
8 |
18 |
| 2019 (to 11
April) |
0 |
0 |
| Total |
520 |
1,519 |
- Indicates
a separate House of Representatives election
- Indicates a separate half-Senate
election
Appendix
2: Floor crossers
Table 23: Alphabetical list of
floor crossers
| MP |
Number of Floor
Crossings |
MP |
Number
of Floor Crossings |
| Abetz, Eric (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
Brownhill, David (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| Adams, Judith (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Bryant, Gordon (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
| Adermann, Charles (NP, Qld) |
1 |
Buchanan, Alexander (LIB, Vic.) |
8 |
| Adermann, Evan (NP, Qld) |
4 |
Bull,
Thomas (NP, NSW) |
5 |
| Aldred, Ken (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Bungey, Melville (LIB, WA) |
15 |
| Allan, Ian (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Burns, William (LIB, Vic.) |
3 |
| Andrew, Neil (LIB, SA) |
2 |
Burr,
Max (LIB, Tas.) |
10 |
| Anthony, Doug (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Bushby, David (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
| Archer, Brian (LIB, Tas.) |
14 |
Buttfield, Nancy (LIB, SA) |
6 |
| Arthur, William (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
Byrne, Condon (ALP, Qld) |
1 |
| Aylett, William (ALP,
Tas.) |
1 |
Cadman, Alan (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Back, Chris (LIB, WA) |
5 |
Cairns, Jim (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
| Baillieu, Marshall (LIB,
Vic.) |
1 |
Cairns, Kevin (LIB, Qld) |
5 |
| Barnes, Charles (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Calder, Stephen (Sam) (NP, NT) |
6 |
| Barnett, Guy (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
Calvert, Paul (LIB, Tas.) |
1 |
| Bate, Jeff (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
Cameron, Donald Alastair (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
| Baume, Peter (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
Cameron, Donald Milner (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Beale, Oliver (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Cameron, Ian Milne Dixon (NP, Qld) |
5 |
| Beazley, Kim Snr (ALP, WA) |
1 |
Campbell, Graeme (ALP, WA) |
4 |
| Bernardi, Cory (LIB, SA) |
6 |
Canavan, Matthew (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Berry, Douglas (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
Cash,
Michaelia (LIB, WA) |
4 |
| Bessell, Eric (LIB, Tas.) |
1 |
Chamberlain, John (LIB, Tas) |
1 |
| Bjelke-Petersen, Flo (NP, Qld) |
18 |
Chaney, Fred Snr (LIB, WA) |
2 |
| Bland, Francis (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
Chester, Darren (NP, Vic.) |
2 |
| Bonner, Neville (LIB, Qld) |
34 |
Christensen, George (NP, Qld) |
2 |
| Bosman, Leonard (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
Clarey, Percy (ALP, Vic) |
1 |
| Bostock, William (LIB, Vic) |
2 |
Cobb, John (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| Boswell, Ron (NP, Qld) |
15 |
Cole,
George (ALP, Tas.) |
3 |
| Boyce, Sue (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
Collard, Stan (NP, Qld) |
2 |
| Braithwaite, Ray (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Cooke, Joseph (ALP, WA) |
1 |
| Branson, George (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Cormack, Magnus (LIB, Vic.) |
12 |
| Breen, Marie (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Cormann, Mathias (LIB, WA) |
4 |
| Bridges-Maxwell, Crawford (LIB,
NSW) |
2 |
Corser, Bernard (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Brimblecombe, Wilfred (NP, Qld) |
4 |
Costa, Dominic (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Broadbent, Russell (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
Cotter, John (LIB, WA) |
4 |
| Brownbill, Kay (LIB, SA) |
1 |
Cotton, Robert (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Coulton, Mark (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Hall,
Steele (LIB, SA) |
5 |
| Cowan, David (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Hamer, David (LIB, Vic.) |
7 |
| Cramer, John (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Hamilton, Leonard (NP, WA) |
2 |
| Crichton-Browne, Noel (LIB, WA) |
10 |
Hannaford, Douglas (LIB, SA) |
9 |
| Crook, Tony (NP, WA) |
2 |
Hannan, George (LIB, Vic.) |
5 |
| Davidson, Charles (NP, Qld) |
1 |
Harrison, Eric John (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
| Davis, Francis (LIB,
Vic.) |
5 |
Hartsuyker, Luke (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| Dean, Roger (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Hasluck, Paul (LIB, WA) |
1 |
| Devine, Leonard (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
Haworth, William (LIB, Vic.) |
3 |
| Downer, Alexander Snr (LIB,
SA) |
3 |
Henty, Norman (LIB, Tas.) |
5 |
| Drake-Brockman, Thomas (NP, WA) |
1 |
Herron, John (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
| Drummond, Peter (LIB, WA) |
3 |
Hicks, Noel (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Drury, Edward (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
Hill,
Robert (LIB, SA) |
10 |
| Durack, Peter (LIB, WA) |
2 |
Hodgman, Michael (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
| Eggleston, Alan (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Holt,
Harold (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Everingham, Doug (ALP, Qld) |
1 |
Hull,
Kay (NP, NSW) |
4 |
| Failes, Laurence (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Hulme, Alan (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Fairbairn, David (LIB, NSW) |
4 |
Humphries, Gary (LIB, ACT) |
3 |
| Fairhall, Allen (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
Hunt,
Ralph (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Falkinder, Charles (LIB,
Tas.) |
6 |
Hyde,
John (LIB, WA) |
7 |
| Ferguson, Alan (LIB, SA) |
5 |
Irwin, Leslie (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
| Fifield, Mitch (LIB, Vic.) |
3 |
Jack,
William (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
| Fisher, Peter (NP, Vic.) |
4 |
James, Bert (ALP, NSW) |
3 |
| Forrest, John (NP, Vic.) |
3 |
Jess, John (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Francis, Josiah (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
Jessop, Don (LIB, SA) |
27 |
| Fraser, Allan (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
Johnson, Les (ALP, NSW) |
2 |
| Freeth, Gordon (LIB, WA) |
2 |
Jones, Charlie (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Georges, George (ALP, Qld) |
2 |
Joske, Percy (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
| Georgiou, Petro (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
Joyce, Barnaby (NP, Qld) |
28 |
| Gibbs, Wylie (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
Jull,
David (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Gichuhi, Lucy (LIB, SA) |
1 |
Katter, Bob (NP, Qld) |
9 |
| Giles, Geoffrey (LIB, SA) |
4 |
Katter, Bob Snr (NP, Qld) |
2 |
| Goodluck, Bruce (LIB, Tas.) |
10 |
Kekwick, Bruce (LIB, Tas.) |
1 |
| Gorton, John (LIB, Vic.) |
6 |
Kelly, De-Anne (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Graham, Bruce (LIB, NSW) |
6 |
Kendall, Roy (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
| Greenwood, Ivor (LIB, Vic.) |
10 |
Kennelly, Patrick (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
| Griggs, Natasha (CLP, NT) |
1 |
Kent Hughes, Wilfred (LIB,
Vic.) |
8 |
| Groom, Ray (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
Killen, Jim (LIB, Qld) |
10 |
| Gullett, Henry (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
King, Robert (NP, Vic.) |
2 |
| Guy, James Allan (LIB,
Tas.) |
3 |
Knight, John (LIB, ACT) |
1 |
| Laucke, Condor (LIB, SA) |
2 |
McKenna, Nicholas (ALP, Tas.) |
2 |
| Laught, Keith (LIB, SA) |
3 |
McKenzie, Bridget (NP, Vic.) |
2 |
| Lawrence, William (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
McLean, Ross (LIB, WA) |
5 |
| Lawrie, Alexander (NP,
Qld) |
3 |
McMahon, William (LIB, NSW) |
8 |
| Lee, Mervyn (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
McVeigh, Tom (NP, Qld) |
1 |
| Leslie, Hugh (NP, WA) |
1 |
Millar, Clarrie (NP, Qld) |
4 |
| Lewis, Austin (LIB, Vic.) |
4 |
Missen, Alan (LIB, Vic.) |
41 |
| Lightfoot, Ross (LIB, WA) |
1 |
Molan, Jim (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Lillico, Alexander (LIB,
Tas.) |
21 |
Morris, Kenneth (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Lindsay, Robert (LIB, Vic.) |
4 |
Moylan, Judi (LIB, WA) |
5 |
| Lloyd, Bruce (NP, Vic.) |
1 |
Munro, Dugald (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Luck, Aubrey (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
Nash,
Fiona (NP, NSW) |
7 |
| Lucock, Philip (NP, NSW) |
5 |
Neville, Paul (NP, Qld) |
5 |
| Lusher, Stephen (NP, NSW) |
1 |
O'Byrne, Justin (ALP, Tas.) |
1 |
| Macdonald, Ian (LIB, Qld) |
9 |
O'Chee, Bill (NP, Qld) |
4 |
| Macdonald, Sandy (NP, NSW) |
4 |
O'Flaherty, Sidney (ALP, SA) |
1 |
| MacGibbon, David (LIB, Qld) |
9 |
O'Keefe, Frank (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Mackay, Malcolm (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
Opperman, Hubert (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| MacKellar, Michael (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Osborne, Frederick (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| MacKenzie, Alexander (NP,
NSW) |
1 |
O'Sullivan, Barry (NP, Qld) |
8 |
| MacKinnon, Ewen (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
O'Sullivan, Neil (LIB, Qld) |
6 |
| Macphee, Ian (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Paltridge, Shane (LIB, WA) |
2 |
| Maher, Edmund (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Patterson, Rex (ALP, Qld) |
1 |
| Maisey, Donald (NP, WA) |
2 |
Peacock, Andrew (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Marek, Paul (NP, Qld) |
3 |
Pearce, Henry (LIB, Qld) |
4 |
| Marriott, John (LIB, Tas.) |
8 |
Pearson, Rex (LIB, SA) |
4 |
| Martin (Sullivan), Kathy (LIB, Qld) |
20 |
Porter, James (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Martin, Steve (NP, Tas.) |
3 |
Prowse, Edgar (NP, WA) |
6 |
| Martyr, John (LIB, WA) |
7 |
Puplick, Chris (LIB, NSW) |
7 |
| Mason, Brett (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
Quick, Harry (ALP, Tas.) |
1 |
| Mattner, Edward (LIB, SA) |
17 |
Rae,
Peter (LIB, Tas.) |
21 |
| Maunsell, Charles (NP, Qld) |
3 |
Rankin, George (NP, Vic.) |
4 |
| McCallum, John (LIB, NSW) |
4 |
Reid,
Albert (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| McColm, Malcolm (LIB, Qld) |
10 |
Reid,
Leonard (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| McCormack, Michael (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Reid,
Margaret (LIB, ACT) |
1 |
| McDonald, Allan (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Roberton, Hugh (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| McEwen, John (NP, Vic.) |
1 |
Robertson, Agnes (NP, LIB, WA) |
6 |
| McGauran, Julian (NP, Vic.) |
8 |
Robinson, Ian (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| McGauran, Peter (NP, Vic.) |
1 |
Rocher, Allan (LIB, WA) |
12 |
| McGrath, James (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
Rosevear, John (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Ruddock, Philip (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Uren,
Tom (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Ruston, Anne (LIB, SA) |
1 |
Vaile, Mark (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| Sainsbury, Murray (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
Vanstone, Amanda (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Scholes, Gordon (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
Vincent, Victor (LIB, WA) |
6 |
| Schultz, Alby (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
Walters, Shirley (LIB, Tas.) |
14 |
| Scott, Douglas (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Ward,
Eddie (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Scott, Malcolm (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Wardlaw, Robert (LIB, Tas.) |
9 |
| Scullion, Nigel (CLP, NT) |
4 |
Washer, Mal (LIB, WA) |
1 |
| Secker, Patrick (LIB, SA) |
1 |
Watson, John (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
| Seselja, Zed (LIB, ACT) |
1 |
Webster, James (NP, Vic.) |
3 |
| Seward, Harrie (NP, WA) |
10 |
Wedgwood, Ivy (LIB, Vic.) |
9 |
| Shack, Peter (LIB, WA) |
5 |
Wentworth, William (LIB, NSW) |
31 |
| Sheil, Glen (NP, Qld) |
5 |
White, Peter (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Shipton, Roger (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
Whittorn, Ray (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
| Sim, John (LIB, WA) |
13 |
Wight, Bruce (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Sinclair, Ian (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Williams, John (NP, NSW) |
13 |
| Smith, Anthony (Tony) Charles (LIB,
Qld) |
1 |
Wilson, Ian (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Spender, John (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Wilson, Keith (LIB, SA) |
2 |
| St John, Edward (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
Withers, Reg (LIB, WA) |
11 |
| Stewart, Frank (ALP, NSW) |
2 |
Wood,
Ian (LIB, Qld) |
130 |
| Stoker, Amanda (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
Wordsworth, Robert (LIB, Tas.) |
5 |
| Stokes, Philip (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Wright, Reg (LIB, Tas.) |
150 |
| Stone, John (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Yates, William (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Stone, Sharman (LIB,
Vic.) |
1 |
Young, Harold (LIB, SA) |
6 |
| Sullivan, John (NP, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Swartz, Reg (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
|
|
| Tambling, Grant (CLP, NT) |
5 |
|
|
| Teague, Baden (LIB, SA) |
1 |
|
|
| Thomas, Andrew (LIB, WA) |
3 |
|
|
| Thompson, Albert (ALP, SA) |
1 |
|
|
| Timson, Thomas (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
|
|
| Townley, Michael (LIB,
Tas.) |
29 |
|
|
| Treloar, Thomas (NP, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Troeth, Judith (LIB, Vic.) |
3 |
|
|
| Truss, Warren (NP, Qld) |
3 |
|
|
| Tuckey, Wilson (LIB, WA) |
7 |
|
|
| Turnbull, Malcolm (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Turnbull, Winton (NP, Vic.) |
5 |
|
|
| Turner, Henry (LIB, NSW) |
12 |
|
|
| Total |
|
MPs: 295 |
Floor
crossings: 1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 24: Floor crossers by number
of floor crossings
| MP |
Number of Floor
Crossings |
MP |
Number
of Floor Crossings |
| Wright, Reg (LIB, Tas.) |
150 |
Buchanan, Alexander (LIB,
Vic.) |
8 |
| Wood, Ian (LIB, Qld) |
130 |
Kent Hughes, Wilfred (LIB,
Vic.) |
8 |
| Missen, Alan (LIB, Vic.) |
41 |
Marriott, John (LIB, Tas.) |
8 |
| Bonner, Neville (LIB, Qld) |
34 |
McGauran, Julian (NP, Vic.) |
8 |
| Wentworth, William (LIB, NSW) |
31 |
McMahon, William (LIB, NSW) |
8 |
| Townley, Michael (LIB,
Tas.) |
29 |
O'Sullivan, Barry (NP, Qld) |
8 |
| Joyce, Barnaby (NP, Qld) |
28 |
Hamer, David (LIB, Vic.) |
7 |
| Jessop, Don (LIB, SA) |
27 |
Hyde, John (LIB, WA) |
7 |
| Lillico, Alexander (LIB,
Tas.) |
21 |
Martyr, John (LIB, WA) |
7 |
| Rae, Peter (LIB, Tas.) |
21 |
Nash, Fiona (NP, NSW) |
7 |
| Martin (Sullivan), Kathy (LIB, Qld) |
20 |
Puplick, Chris (LIB, NSW) |
7 |
| Bjelke-Petersen, Flo (NP, Qld) |
18 |
Tuckey, Wilson (LIB, WA) |
7 |
| Mattner, Edward (LIB, SA) |
17 |
Bernardi, Cory (LIB, SA) |
6 |
| Boswell, Ron (NP, Qld) |
15 |
Buttfield, Nancy (LIB, SA) |
6 |
| Bungey, Melville (LIB, WA) |
15 |
Calder, Stephen (Sam) (NP,
NT) |
6 |
| Archer, Brian (LIB, Tas.) |
14 |
Falkinder, Charles (LIB,
Tas.) |
6 |
| Walters, Shirley (LIB,
Tas.) |
14 |
Gorton,
John (LIB, Vic.) |
6 |
| Sim, John (LIB, WA) |
13 |
Graham, Bruce (LIB, NSW) |
6 |
| Williams, John (NP, NSW) |
13 |
O'Sullivan, Neil (LIB, Qld) |
6 |
| Cormack, Magnus (LIB, Vic.) |
12 |
Prowse, Edgar (NP, WA) |
6 |
| Rocher, Allan (LIB, WA) |
12 |
Robertson, Agnes (NP, LIB,
WA) |
6 |
| Turner ,Henry (LIB, NSW) |
12 |
Vincent, Victor (LIB, WA) |
6 |
| Withers, Reg (LIB, WA) |
11 |
Young, Harold (LIB, SA) |
6 |
| Burr, Max (LIB, Tas.) |
10 |
Back, Chris (LIB, WA) |
5 |
| Crichton-Browne, Noel (LIB, WA) |
10 |
Bate, Jeff (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
| Goodluck, Bruce (LIB, Tas.) |
10 |
Bull, Thomas (NP, NSW) |
5 |
| Greenwood, Ivor (LIB, Vic.) |
10 |
Cairns, Kevin (LIB, Qld) |
5 |
| Hill, Robert (LIB, SA) |
10 |
Cameron,
Ian Milne Dixon (NP, Qld) |
5 |
| Killen, Jim (LIB, Qld) |
10 |
Davis, Francis (LIB,
Vic.) |
5 |
| McColm, Malcolm (LIB, Qld) |
10 |
Fairhall, Allen (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
| Seward, Harrie (NP, WA) |
10 |
Ferguson, Alan (LIB, SA) |
5 |
| Hannaford, Douglas (LIB, SA) |
9 |
Hall, Steele (LIB, SA) |
5 |
| Katter, Bob (NP, Qld) |
9 |
Hannan, George (LIB, Vic.) |
5 |
| Macdonald, Ian (LIB, Qld) |
9 |
Henty, Norman (LIB, Tas.) |
5 |
| MacGibbon, David (LIB, Qld) |
9 |
Irwin, Leslie (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
| Wardlaw, Robert (LIB, Tas.) |
9 |
Lucock, Philip (NP, NSW) |
5 |
| Wedgwood, Ivy (LIB, Vic.) |
9 |
McLean, Ross (LIB, WA) |
5 |
| Moylan, Judi (LIB, WA) |
5 |
Burns, William (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
| Neville, Paul (NP, Qld) |
5 |
Cameron, Donald Alastair (LIB,
Qld) |
3 |
| Shack, Peter (LIB, WA) |
5 |
Canavan, Matthew (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Sheil, Glen (NP, Qld) |
5 |
Cole, George (ALP, Tas.) |
3 |
| St John, Edward (LIB, NSW) |
5 |
Corser, Bernard (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Tambling, Grant (CLP, NT) |
5 |
Downer, Alexander Snr (LIB,
SA) |
3 |
| Turnbull, Winton (NP, Vic.) |
5 |
Drummond, Peter (LIB, WA) |
3 |
| Wordsworth, Robert (LIB, Tas.) |
5 |
Drury, Edward (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
| Abetz, Eric (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
Fifield, Mitch (LIB, Vic.) |
3 |
| Adams, Judith (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Forrest, John (NP, Vic.) |
3 |
| Adermann, Evan (NP, Qld) |
4 |
Groom, Ray (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
| Branson, George (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Guy, James Allan (LIB,
Tas.) |
3 |
| Brimblecombe, Wilfred (NP, Qld) |
4 |
Haworth, William (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
| Bushby, David (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
Humphries, Gary (LIB, ACT) |
3 |
| Campbell, Graeme (ALP, WA) |
4 |
James,
Bert (ALP, NSW) |
3 |
| Cash, Michaelia (LIB,
WA) |
4 |
Kelly, De-Anne (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Cormann, Mathias (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Kendall, Roy (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
| Cotter, John (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Laught, Keith (LIB, SA) |
3 |
| Eggleston, Alan (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Lawrence, William (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
| Fairbairn, David (LIB, NSW) |
4 |
Lawrie, Alexander (NP,
Qld) |
3 |
| Fisher, Peter (NP, Vic.) |
4 |
Luck,
Aubrey (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
| Giles, Geoffrey (LIB, SA) |
4 |
Mackay, Malcolm (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
| Hodgman, Michael (LIB,
Tas.) |
4 |
Marek, Paul (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Hull, Kay (NP, NSW) |
4 |
Martin, Steve NP Tas |
3 |
| Lewis Austin (LIB, Vic.) |
4 |
Mason, Brett (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
| Lindsay, Robert (LIB, Vic.) |
4 |
Maunsell, Charles (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Macdonald, Sandy (NP, NSW) |
4 |
Sainsbury, Murray (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
| McCallum, John (LIB, NSW) |
4 |
Schultz, Alby (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
| Millar, Clarrie (NP, Qld) |
4 |
Thomas, Andrew (LIB, WA) |
3 |
| O'Chee, Bill (NP, Qld) |
4 |
Troeth, Judith (LIB, Vic.) |
3 |
| Pearce, Henry (LIB, Qld) |
4 |
Truss, Warren (NP, Qld) |
3 |
| Pearson, Rex (LIB, SA) |
4 |
Webster, James (NP, Vic.) |
3 |
| Rankin, George (NP, Vic.) |
4 |
Andrew, Neil (LIB, SA) |
2 |
| Scott, Malcolm (LIB, WA) |
4 |
Anthony, Doug (NP, NSW) |
2 |
| Scullion, Nigel (CLP, NT) |
4 |
Arthur, William (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
| Watson, John (LIB, Tas.) |
4 |
Barnes, Charles (NP, Qld) |
2 |
| Barnett, Guy (LIB, Tas.) |
3 |
Bland, Francis (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
| Baume, Peter (LIB, NSW) |
3 |
Bosman, Leonard (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
| Boyce, Sue (LIB, Qld) |
3 |
Bostock, William (LIB, Vic) |
2 |
| Broadbent, Russell (LIB,
Vic.) |
3 |
Braithwaite, Ray (NP, Qld) |
2 |
| Bridges-Maxwell, Crawford (LIB,
NSW) |
2 |
White, Peter (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Brownhill, David (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Whittorn, Ray (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
| Cameron, Donald Milner (LIB,
Qld) |
2 |
Wight, Bruce (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
| Chaney, Fred Snr (LIB, WA) |
2 |
Wilson, Keith (LIB, SA) |
2 |
| Chester, Darren (NP, Vic.) |
2 |
Adermann, Charles (NP, Qld) |
1 |
| Christensen, George (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Aldred,
Ken (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Cobb, John (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Allan, Ian (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Collard, Stan (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Aylett, William (ALP,
Tas.) |
1 |
| Coulton, Mark (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Baillieu, Marshall (LIB,
Vic.) |
1 |
| Crook, Tony (NP, WA) |
2 |
Beale, Oliver (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Durack, Peter (LIB, WA) |
2 |
Beazley, Kim Snr (ALP, WA) |
1 |
| Freeth, Gordon (LIB, WA) |
2 |
Berry,
Douglas (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
| Georges, George (ALP, Qld) |
2 |
Bessell, Eric (LIB, Tas.) |
1 |
| Georgiou, Petro (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
Breen, Marie (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Hamilton, Leonard (NP, WA) |
2 |
Brownbill, Kay (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Harrison, Eric John (LIB,
NSW) |
2 |
Bryant, Gordon (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
| Hartsuyker, Luke (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Byrne, Condon (ALP, Qld) |
1 |
| Hulme, Alan (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
Cadman,
Alan (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Jack, William (LIB, NSW) |
2 |
Cairns,
Jim (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
| Johnson, Les (ALP, NSW) |
2 |
Calvert,
Paul (LIB, Tas.) |
1 |
| Joske, Percy (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
Chamberlain, John (LIB, Tas) |
1 |
| Jull, David (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
Clarey,
Percy (ALP, Vic) |
1 |
| Katter, Bob Snr (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Cooke, Joseph (ALP, WA) |
1 |
| King, Robert (NP, Vic.) |
2 |
Costa, Dominic (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Laucke, Condor (LIB, SA) |
2 |
Cotton, Robert (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| MacKinnon, Ewen (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
Cowan, David (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Maher, Edmund (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Cramer,
John (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Maisey, Donald (NP, WA) |
2 |
Davidson, Charles (NP, Qld) |
1 |
| McGrath, James (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
Dean, Roger (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| McKenna, Nicholas (ALP,
Tas.) |
2 |
Devine, Leonard (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| McKenzie, Bridget (NP, Vic.) |
2 |
Drake-Brockman, Thomas (NP, WA) |
1 |
| Morris, Kenneth (LIB, Qld) |
2 |
Everingham, Doug (ALP, Qld) |
1 |
| Paltridge, Shane (LIB, WA) |
2 |
Failes, Laurence (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Roberton, Hugh (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Francis, Josiah (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
| Robinson, Ian (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Fraser,
Allan (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| Scott, Douglas (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Gibbs, Wylie (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
| Shipton, Roger (LIB, Vic.) |
2 |
Gichuhi, Lucy (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Stewart, Frank (ALP, NSW) |
2 |
Griggs, Natasha (CLP, NT) |
1 |
| Stone, John (NP, Qld) |
2 |
Gullett, Henry (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Vaile, Mark (NP, NSW) |
2 |
Hasluck, Paul (LIB, WA) |
1 |
| Herron, John (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
Scholes, Gordon (ALP, Vic.) |
1 |
| Hicks, Noel (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Secker,
Patrick (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Holt, Harold (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Hunt, Ralph (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Jess, John (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Seselja, Zed (LIB, ACT) |
1 |
| Jones, Charlie (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
Sinclair, Ian (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Kekwick, Bruce (LIB, Tas.) |
1 |
Smith, Anthony (Tony) Charles (LIB,
Qld) |
1 |
| Kennelly, Patrick (ALP,
Vic.) |
1 |
Spender,
John (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| Knight, John (LIB, ACT) |
1 |
Stoker,
Amanda (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
| Lee, Mervyn (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Stokes, Philip (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Leslie, Hugh (NP, WA) |
1 |
Stone, Sharman (LIB,
Vic.) |
1 |
| Lightfoot, Ross (LIB, WA) |
1 |
Sullivan, John (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| Lloyd, Bruce (NP, Vic.) |
1 |
Swartz, Reg (LIB, Qld) |
1 |
| Lusher, Stephen (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Teague, Baden (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| MacKellar, Michael (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Thompson, Albert (ALP, SA) |
1 |
| MacKenzie, Alexander (NP,
NSW) |
1 |
Timson, Thomas (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
| Macphee, Ian (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Treloar, Thomas (NP, NSW) |
1 |
| McCormack, Michael (NP, NSW) |
1 |
Turnbull, Malcolm (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
| McDonald, Allan (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
Uren, Tom (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| McEwen, John (NP, Vic.) |
1 |
Vanstone, Amanda (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| McGauran, Peter (NP, Vic.) |
1 |
Ward, Eddie (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
| McVeigh, Tom (NP, Qld) |
1 |
Washer, Mal (LIB, WA) |
1 |
| Molan, Jim (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Wilson, Ian (LIB, SA) |
1 |
| Munro, Dugald (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
Yates, William (LIB,
Vic.) |
1 |
| O'Byrne, Justin (ALP, Tas.) |
1 |
|
|
| O'Flaherty, Sidney (ALP, SA) |
1 |
|
|
| O'Keefe, Frank (NP, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Opperman, Hubert (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
|
|
| Osborne, Frederick (LIB,
NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Patterson, Rex (ALP, Qld) |
1 |
|
|
| Peacock, Andrew (LIB, Vic.) |
1 |
|
|
| Porter, James (LIB, SA) |
1 |
|
|
| Quick, Harry (ALP, Tas.) |
1 |
|
|
| Reid, Albert (NP, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Reid, Leonard (LIB,
Vic.) |
1 |
|
|
| Reid, Margaret (LIB,
ACT) |
1 |
|
|
| Rosevear, John (ALP, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Ruddock, Philip (LIB, NSW) |
1 |
|
|
| Ruston, Anne (LIB, SA) |
1 |
|
|
| Total |
|
MPs: 295 |
Floor
crossings: 1,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources
of biographical information
Additional biographical information on senators and members
is available from the following sources:
The
Parliamentary Handbook of the Commonwealth of Australia, online
edn.
Australian Parliament House (APH), ParlInfo, biography
(guided search), APH website.
The Biographical
dictionary of the Australian Senate, online edn.
Australian dictionary of
biography, online edn.
[1]. Members of
the House of Representatives elected at the federal election held on 10
December 1949 took their seats when the 19th Parliament was opened on 22
February 1950 and in the Senate from 1 July 1950. The size of the Parliament
increased at the 1949 election, from 36 to 60 seats in the Senate and from 75
to 123 seats in the House of Representatives. The 45th Parliament was prorogued
on 11 April 2019 and the House of Representatives was dissolved on the same
day.
[2]. See House of
Representatives, ‘Infosheet
14: Making decisions—debate and division’, House of Representatives Infosheets,
August 2008. See also House of Representatives,‘Infosheet
24: Glossary of procedural terms’, House of Representatives Infosheets,
July 2019.
[3]. See the
Nationals, ‘Our history’,
the Nationals website.
[4]. See D
McKeown, R Lundie and G Baker, Crossing
the floor in the Federal Parliament 1950–August 2004, Research note,
11, 2005-06, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 11 October 2005.
[5]. Please note,
that for the purposes of this paper the term ‘members of parliament’ refers to
senators and members of the House of Representatives.
[6]. A UK study
of party dissent, published in 2018, suggested that strong party discipline is
a core feature of Westminster parliamentary systems. See J Slapin, J Kirkland,
J Lazzaro, P Leslie and T O’Grady, ‘Ideology,
grandstanding, and strategic party disloyalty in the British Parliament’, American
Political Science Review, v. 112(1), February 2018, p. 15.
[7]. J Valder, Report
of the committee of review: Facing the facts, Liberal Party of
Australia, 30 September 1983, p. 102.
[8]. Ibid.
[9]. The
Nationals, National
Party of Australia federal constitution, September 2017, para 29.4.
[10]. National
Party of Australia, ‘Our
history’, The Nationals website.
[11]. Note:
although ‘analyses of European parliamentary systems have revealed a high level
of voting unity’, members of these parliaments also occasionally rebel against
the party line. See S Bailer, ‘To
use the whip or not: whether and when party group leaders use disciplinary
measures to achieve voting unity’, International Political Science
Review, 39(2), 1 March 2018, p. 164.
[12]. The House of
Representatives Chamber Research Office notes in the published list of the
number of divisions
by year that the list ‘[d]oes not include divisions with four or fewer Members
on one side (standing order 127), as they are not officially counted as
divisions’.
[13]. For example,
the paper includes floor crossings by the following MPs during their membership
of a major party: Cory Bernardi (LIB, SA), George Cole (ALP, Tas.), Lucy
Gichuhi (LIB, SA), Bob Katter (NP, Qld), Steve Martin (NP, Tas.) and Michael
Townley (LIB, Tas.).
[14]. A study
published in 2017 referred to the ‘distinction between voting against the party
line on the floor [crossing the floor] ... and abstaining from the vote’. The
authors suggested that ‘[w]hile both involve an MP denying the party her vote,
the effect is moderated in the case of abstention by the simultaneous denial of
a vote against the MP’s party as well’. In short, ‘abstention allows the MP to
register her disapproval at a lower cost’. See, D Willumsen and P Ohberg, ‘Toe
the line, break the whip: explaining floor dissent in
parliamentary democracies’, West European Politics, v.40(4), pp. 692–693.
[15]. For more
information on conscience votes in the federal Parliament see D McKeown and R
Lundie, Free votes in Australian and some overseas parliaments, Current issues brief, 1, 2002–03, Parliamentary Library, Canberra,
2002 and D McKeown and R Lundie, Conscience votes during the Howard Government 1996–2007, Research paper, 20, 2008–09, Parliamentary Library Canberra, 2009.
[16]. National
Party of Australia, ‘Our
history’, The Nationals website. For an
example of split votes when the Nationals and the Liberal party were not in
coalition, see the Schools Commission Bill 1973 and the States Grants (Schools)
Bill 1973 in the Senate and House of Representatives on 12th and 13th December
1973 when Country Party MPs voted with the Whitlam Government. The bills were
opposed by the Liberal Party.
[17]. The effect of
the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984, s. 11 is that
sometimes members of parliament vote against a referendum bill, not because
they oppose the questions being put to the people, but to be able to be
involved in the preparation of the ‘No’ case. This artificial arrangement has
not been classified as either a floor crossing or a conscience vote. See House
of Representatives, House of Representatives Practice, 7th edition,
2018, ‘Constitution
alteration’, footnote
169.
[18]. Sources used
also include Senate StatsNet
and House of Representatives Statistics.
[19]. J Warhurst, ‘How
the PM shut down the internal dissenters’, Canberra Times, 24 June
2005, p. 15.
[20]. B Juddery, ‘The Wright ideals’,
Canberra Times, 2 April 1969, p. 12.
[21]. J Moylan,
Speech accepting Alan Missen award, Accountability
round table integrity awards, Canberra, 11 December 2013.
[22]. A Crook, ‘Parliamentary
poet Judi Moylan on being a political terrorist’, Crikey, 28 October
2013.
[23]. S Boyce, ‘Parliamentary
representation: valedictories’, Senate, Debates, 18 June 2014, pp.
3307–3310.
[24]. H Ewart, ‘A
country road – the Nationals’, ABC1, Australian Broadcasting Corporation
(ABC), 9 December 2014, ep 3.
[25]. R Boswell, ‘Environmental
and Natural Resource Management Guidelines–Motion for disallowance’,
Senate, Debates,
1 December 2008, p. 7720.
[26]. B Joyce, ‘Valedictory: retirement of the Clerk of the Senate, Harry Evans’, Senate, Debates, 19 November 2009, p. 8418.
[27]. M Radean, ‘Sometimes you cannot have it all: party switching and affiliation
motivations as substitutes’, Party Politics,
25(2), March 2019, p. 140.
[28]. C Bernardi, ‘Statements:
Liberal Party of Australia’, Senate, Debates, 7 February 2017, p. 4.
See also P Van Onselen, ‘Cory,
rebel of the right’, Australian, 7 February 2017, p. 11.
[29]. Ibid. Bernardi
registered his party, Australian Conservatives (AC) on 12 April 2017 and deregistered
the party on 25 June 2019. See Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), Australian
Conservatives voluntary deregistration, AEC website. On 4 December 2019 Bernardi
announced his intention to resign from the Senate. See C Bernardi, ‘Party
representation: valedictory’, Senate, Debates, 4 December 2019, p.
96. He resigned
from the Senate on 20 January 2020.
[30]. P Wong, ‘Statements:
Liberal Party of Australia’, Senate, Debates, 7 February 2017, p. 5.
[31]. M McKew and F
Kelly, ‘Bob
Katter resigns from the National Party to stand as an Independent in the seat
of Kennedy’, The 7.30 Report, Australian broadcasting Commission
(ABC), 9 July 2001. See also S Strutt, ‘The
maverick MP who turned lone ranger’, Australian Financial Review, 12
July 2001 and P Sheehan, ‘Katter’s
shock exit to rebels’, Sydney Morning Herald, 7 July 2001. Katter
registered his party, Katter’s Australian Party (KAP) on 27 September 2011. See
Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), Current
register of political parties, AEC website.
[32]. Note:
although Barnaby Joyce has served in both Houses during the period of the
study, he has only crossed the floor in the Senate.
[33]. Women who
crossed the floor alone: Senators Flo Bjelke-Petersen (2 times), Sue Boyce (2),
Judith Troeth (2) and Amanda Vanstone (1) and members Judi Moylan (2), Kay Hull
(2) and Natasha Griggs (1). Senators Boyce and Troeth crossed together in one
division.
[34]. The Biographical
dictionary of the Australian Senate notes that
Kathy Martin (Sullivan) was ‘[k]’nown in the Senate as Kathy
Martin, she continued under that name during her marriage to Jim Gray from 1975
to 1978. In 1983, Martin married Robert (Bob) Sullivan, a businessman and
former US Marine, and from December 1984 she was known as Kathy Sullivan or
Kathy Martin Sullivan’. She was elected to the House of Representatives on 1
December 1984. See A Jongsma, ‘Sullivan,
Kathryn Jean Martin (1942–)’, The Biographical
dictionary of the Australian Senate, Online edn.
[35]. Ibid. Martin crossed the floor with the following Liberal senators, who
also appear in the list of most frequent floor crossers in table 12: Reg Wright
eight times, Ian Wood (8), Alan Missen (7), Neville Bonner (17), Michael
Townley (12), Don Jessop (13),
Peter Rae (13), John Sim (9), Magnus Cormack (8), Robert Hill (7) and Shirley
Walters (7).
[36]. K [Martin]
Sullivan, ‘Member
for Moncrieff’, House of Representatives, Debates, 29 March 1999, p.
4573.
[37]. A Hough, ‘Two parliamentary milestones for women: 75 years of women in the
Commonwealth Parliament and Australia's 100th female senator‘, FlagPost
weblog, 20 August 2018.
[38]. Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘Adjournment
moved’, Votes and Proceedings, HVP 61, 5 March 1952.
[39]. Australia,
Senate, ‘Berry
fruits industry’, Journals, SJ 103, 21 October 1953.
[40]. Australia,
Senate, ‘Sugar
Agreement Bill 1954’, Journals, SJ 8, 15 September 1954.
[41]. Australia,
Senate, ‘Parliamentary
Retiring Allowances Bill 1955’, Journals, SJ 47, 9 June 1955.
[42]. Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘Tariff
Board–annual report’, Votes and Proceedings, HVP 67, 28 November
1968.
[43]. Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘Customs
Amendment Bill 1979’, Votes and Proceedings, HVP 104, 29 May 1979.
[44]. J Slapin et
al., ‘Ideology, grandstanding, and strategic party disloyalty in the British
Parliament’, op. cit., p. 15.
[45]. Ibid., p. 16.
[46]. H Quick, ‘Third
reading: Anti-Terrorism Bill (No 2) 2005’, House of Representatives, Debates,
29 November 2005, p. 107. Note: Quick is not recorded as opposing the third
reading of the Bill in Votes and Proceedings for 29 November 2005.
[47]. Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘Tariff
Board – annual report, 1967-68’, Votes and proceedings, HVP 67, 28
November 1968.
[48]. Australia.
House of Representatives, ‘Speaker's
ruling-motion of dissent’, Votes and proceedings, HVP 51, 12 May
1955.
[49]. Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘Representation
Bill 1983’, Votes and proceedings, HVP 41, 15 November 1983.
[50]. A Hermann, Alan
Missen: Liberal pilgrim, The Popular Press, Canberra, 1993, p. 159.
[51]. G Browne, ‘Missen, Alan Joseph
(1925–1986)’, The Biographical dictionary of the
Australian Senate, Online edn.
[52]. Hermann, op.
cit., p. 162.
[53]. Ibid., p.
185.
[54]. At the time
of writing there had been one floor crossing in the 46th parliament. Senator
Susan McDonald (NP, Qld) voted with Australian Greens and
Centre Alliance senators in favour of the motion ‘that the Civil Aviation
(Community Service Flights—Conditions on Flight Crew Licences) Instrument 2019
be disallowed’. The motion was defeated. See Australia, Senate, ‘Civil Aviation (Community Service Flights—Conditions on Flight Crew
Licences) Instrument 2019—Proposed disallowance’, Journals,
SJ 23, 17 October 2019.
[55]. Chamber and
bill procedural issues include, for example, motions that the Senate or the
House adjourn, motions that ‘the question be now put’ and motions that progress
be reported at the committee stage of a bill. Votes at the second or third
reading stage of a bill and on amendments moved at the committee stage of a
bill are not included.
[56]. S Boyce, ‘Second
reading speech: Marriage Act Amendment (Recognition of Foreign
Marriages for Same-Sex Couples) Bill 2013’, Senate, Debates,
20 June 2013, p. 3507. See also D McKeown, Chronology of same-sex marriage bills introduced into the federal
parliament: a quick guide, Research paper,
Parliamentary Library, 15 February 2018, pp. 9–10. Note: Coalition MPs were
granted a conscience vote on the Marriage Amendment (Definition and
Religious Freedoms) Bill 2017. This Bill passed both Houses and received Royal
Assent on 8 December 2017.
[57]. B Joyce, ‘Parliamentary representation: valedictory’, Senate, Debates, 26 June 2013, p. 4179.
[58]. S Bennett, ‘‘Wright, Sir Reginald Charles (1905–1990)’, The Biographical dictionary of the
Australian Senate, Online
edn. Bennett notes that ‘[i]n October 1944 Wright was one of two Tasmanian
delegates or observers from the Australian Constitutional League who attended
the Canberra conference at which the establishment of the modern Liberal Party
was initiated’. And as ‘a member of the conference’s ‘Committee on
Organisation’, Wright was one of the seven Tasmanian delegates at the Albury
conference in December, at which the new party was formally constituted’.
[59]. R Sullivan, ‘Wood, Ian
Alexander Christie (1901-1992)’, The Biographical
dictionary of the Australian Senate, Online edn.
[60]. R Wright, Second
reading speech: Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Bill (No 2) 1960’,
Senate, Debates, 7 December 1967, p. 2140.
[61]. W Wright,
‘Senator Reginald Charles Wright (Tasmania): an analysis of the votes cast in
the Senate against the Liberal Governments from 1952 to 1967’, Thesis, 1 August
1968, p. 94.
[62]. P Bowers,
‘Don’t ever call the Senator a defector’, Sydney Morning Herald, 24
February 1967, p. 6.
[63]. Ibid.
[64]. Ibid.
[65]. A Reid, The
Gorton experiment, Shakespeare Head Press, Sydney, 1971, p. 39.
[66]. ‘Sales-tax
bill passed: Senator Wright fails to vote’, Sydney Morning Herald, 8
December 1960.
[67]. ‘Government
to force showdown on tax bill’, Canberra Times, 7 December 1960, p. 1.
[68]. I Wood, ‘Second
reading speech: Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Bill (No 2) 1960’,
Senate, Debates, 7 December 1967, pp. 2146–2151.
[69]. R Wright, ‘Second
reading speech: Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Bill (No 2) 1960’,
op. cit.
[70]. R Wright, ‘Land
Tax Assessment Bill 1952’, Senate, Debates, 4 June 1952, p. 1349.
[71]. D Grant, ‘Land
Tax Assessment Bill 1952’, Senate, Debates, 4 June 1952, p. 1355.
[72]. W Wright,
Thesis, op. cit., p. 8.
[73]. B Juddery,
“The Wright ideals’, op. cit.
[74]. Ibid.
[75]. D Willumsen
and P Ohberg, ‘Toe the line, break the whip:
explaining floor dissent in parliamentary democracies’, op. cit., p. 702.
[76]. P Matthewson,
‘George
Christensen and the dark art of going ‘faux-rogue’ to woo voters’, Crikey,
21 June 2017. See also K Murphy, ‘George
Christensen crosses floor to vote with Labor on penalty rates’, Guardian
(Australia), 20 June 2017.
[77]. House of
Representatives ‘Infosheet 14: Making decisions—debate and division’, op. cit.,
states that ‘[w]ith a few exceptions all business, including the passage of
legislation, is dealt with as a series of motions which are debated and decided
one at a time.’
[78]. F Kelly,
‘Interview with Malcolm Fraser’, RN Breakfast, Australian Broadcasting
Corporation (ABC), 29 June 2005.
[79]. See ‘Party
representation in Parliament’, Parliamentary Handbook of the
Commonwealth of Australia, 45th parliament, 21 June 2017.
[80]. See, for
example floor crossings by Liberal senators Alan Missen, Neville Bonner,
Michael Townley, Don Jessop, Peter Rae and Kathy Martin (Sullivan) in table 12.
[81]. A Lewis, ‘Condolences
– Ian Alexander Christie Wood’, Senate, Debates, 25 February 1992,
p. 34.
[82]. P Cowley, ‘What
makes a Tory MP rebel – and what are their red lines on Brexit’, London
School of Economics weblog, 3 July 2017.
[83]. D Williamsen
and P Ohberg, ‘Toe the line, break the whip: explaining floor dissent in
parliamentary democracies’, op. cit.,
p. 702 (see footnote 14).
[84]. Australia,
Senate, ‘Trade
Practices Legislation Amendment Bill (No. 1) 2005, Journals, SJ 51,
11 October 2005.
[85]. M Grattan, ‘Coalition
stung by the senator and his opposition cohorts’, Age, 13 October
2005, p. 9.
[86]. P Coorey, ‘Fortnight that cornered PM’, Australian
Financial Review, 1 December 2017, p.10. Note:
O’Sullivan did not introduce his private senator’s bill.
[87]. See, for
example, M Grattan, ‘Turnbull
backed against the wall by rebel nationals on bank inquiry’, The
Conversation, 27 November 2017, E Bagshaw, ‘Disgruntled MPs take lead for bank inquiry’, Sydney Morning Herald, 28 November 2017,
p. 6 and A Tillett, ‘Nats
to give Christensen leeway to cross the floor’, Australian Financial
Review, 20 November 2017, p. 1.
[88]. A Ferguson, Banking
bad, HarperCollins Publishers Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2019,
p. 200. For a description of the campaign by the Nationals for a Royal
Commission into the banking industry see Banking bad, pp. 193–204 and D
Atkins, ‘Interview
with Adele Ferguson: insights into the Banking Royal Commission’, RN
Big Ideas, Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), 21 August 2019.
[89]. Ibid.
[90]. M Grattan,
‘Turnbull backed against the wall by rebel nationals on bank inquiry’, op cit.
See also P Coorey, ‘PM tries to head off bank probe’, Australian
Financial Review, 30 November 2017, p. 1.
[91]. M Turnbull
(Prime Minister) and S Morrison (Treasurer), Royal Commission - banks and financial services, media release, 30 November 2017. It was also reported that the
banks ‘asked for the inquiry’, M Kenny, ‘Government in name only as Turnbull changes tune’, Age, 1 December 2017, p. 5.
[92]. See, for
example, C Knaus, ‘The Liberal party is self-destructing over energy. Here's what you
need to know’, Guardian (Australia), 20
August 2018, ‘Christensen won’t cross the floor’, Courier
Mail, 5 December 2017, p. 6, J Walker, ‘Sugar hit: George won’t go over cliff for PM’, Weekend Australian, 4 March 2017, p. 1, P Karp, ‘George Christensen predicts Coalition will axe backpacker tax after
threats to quit LNP’, Guardian (Australia),
18 September 2016 and Editorial, ‘Super solution must be Prime Minister’s priority’, Australian, 22 July 2016, p. 13.
[93]. See, for
example, M Knott, ‘Nats
support Christensen as whip’, Canberra Times, 20 February, p. 5, M
Connors ‘MP
“sorry” for quit threat’, Courier Mail, 20 February 2017, p. 10 and
E Bagshaw, ‘Time
to end the Coalition: Christensen’, Sunday Canberra Times, 25
February 2018, p. 5.
[94]. P Hartcher
and L Bourke, ‘Joyce
names his price for support’, Sydney Morning Herald, 13 August 2018,
p. 5.
[95]. P Karp, ‘Scott
Morrison may face second parliamentary defeat – this time by the nationals’,
Guardian Australia, 15 February 2019.
[96]. Australia,
Senate, ‘Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Measures No. 5) Bill 2018’, Journals, SJ 140, 14 February 2019.
[97]. P Karp, ‘Scott
Morrison may face second parliamentary defeat – this time by Nationals’, Guardian
(Australia), op. cit.
[98]. M Steketee, ‘Wets
freeze up in Howard’s way’, Australian, 17 October 2001.
[99]. See, for
example, L Oakes, ‘Power
plays: doctor who-dunnit’, Bulletin with Newsweek, 23 August 2005,
p. 12. In an article about Barnaby Joyce’s floor crossings, Oakes suggested
that ‘... Liberal attacks raised his profile and added to his cult hero status’.
[100]. F Chaney, ‘Parliament:
our great expectations’, in Papers on Parliament, no. 23,
Parliaments and constitutions under scrutiny, The Senate, Canberra, September
1994, p. 87.
[101]. Quoted in W
Snowdon, ‘Second
reading speech: Commonwealth Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2005’, House
of Representatives, Debates, 1 November 2005, p. 26.
[102]. J Slapin et
al.,‘Ideology, grandstanding, and strategic party disloyalty in the British
Parliament’, op. cit. p. 17.
[103]. For details of
the preliminary study’s fate of floor crossers see McKeown, Lundie and Baker, Crossing
the floor in the federal parliament 1950–August 2004, op. cit., p. 3.
[104]. D Willumsen
and P Ohberg, ‘Toe the line, break the whip:
explaining floor dissent in parliamentary democracies’, op. cit., p. 705.
[105]. Ibid., p. 706.
[106]. B Joyce, ‘Adjournment’, Senate, Debates, 21
March 2013, p. 2399.
[107]. See Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘Immigration
policy’, Votes and Proceedings, HVP 70, 25 August 1988 and
Australia, Senate, ‘Immigration
policy’, Journals, SJ 87, 25 August 1988.
[108]. I Macphee, ‘Liberalism
gets a hearing again’, Australian, 20 June 2005, p. 15.
[109]. S Bennett, ‘Wright, Sir Reginald Charles (1905–1990)’, The Biographical dictionary of the
Australian Senate, op.
cit.
[110]. J Massola and
M Koziol, ‘Christensen
resigns as Nats whip’, Canberra Times, 1 March 2017, p. 10. See also
M Grattan, ‘Untrammelled
Christensen may become even more outspoken’, The Conversation, 28
February 2017.
[111]. P Bowers, 24
February 1967, op. cit.
[112]. A Reid, The
Gorton experiment, op. cit., pp. 335-6.
[113]. Five Liberal
deputy leaders crossed the floor: Eric Harrison, Harold Holt, William McMahon,
John Gorton and Andrew Peacock.
[114]. Thirteen
Nationals deputy leaders crossed the floor: John McEwen, Charles Davidson,
Charles Adermann, Doug Anthony, Ian Sinclair, Ralph Hunt, Bruce Lloyd, Mark
Vaile, Warren Truss, Nigel Scullion, Barnaby Joyce, Fiona Nash and Bridget
McKenzie.
[115]. Deputy Labor
leaders Jim Cairns (who was also Deputy Prime Minister 12.6.1974–2.7.1975) and
Tom Uren crossed the floor in November 1968 to vote against a motion to adjourn
debate on a Tariff Board annual report. The motion was passed. Labor MPs who
crossed the floor in the division were not expelled from the party. See
Australia, House of Representatives, ‘Tariff
Board-Annual Report, 1967-68-Ministerial Statement-Motion To Take Note Of
Paper’, Votes and Proceedings, HVP 67, 28 November 1968, pp.
340–341.
[116]. S Bailer, ‘To use the whip or not: whether
and when party group leaders use disciplinary measures to achieve voting unity’,
op. cit., p. 163.
[117]. Tony Abbott
defeated Malcolm Turnbull for the Liberal Party leadership on 1 December 2009.
The party room voted 55 to 26 to oppose the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme
bills.
[118]. S Boyce, ‘Third
reading speech: Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme Bill 2009 [No. 2]’,
Senate, Debates, 30 November 2009, p. 9595.
[119]. R Viellaris, ‘Queensland
senator crosses the floor’, Courier Mail, 3 December 2009, p. 11.
[120]. L Wilson, ‘Lib
crosses floor on same-sex’, Australian, 21 June 2013, p. 6.
[121]. T Barrass, ‘Howard
olive branch may rescue Moylan’, Australian, 16 August 2006, p. 9.
[122]. L Tingle, ‘Coalition
all at sea over politics of dissent’, Australian Financial Review,
18 August 2006, p. 83.
[123]. G Mcmanus and
J Frenkel, ‘Senior
Nat turns on Joyce’, Courier Mail, 5 August 2005, p. 6.
[124]. D Humphries, ‘Joyce
falls silent on Telstra privatisation’, Sydney Morning Herald,
Herald, 6 August 2005, p. 9.
[125]. See Australia,
Senate, ‘Telstra
(Transition to Full Private Ownership) Bill 2005 [and related bills]’, Journals,
SJ 45, 14 September 2005.
[126]. Quoted in G
Starr, The Liberal Party of Australia: a documentary history,
Drummond/Heinemann, Melbourne, 1980, pp. 171–72. See also W Wentworth, ‘Suspension
of Standing Orders: Civil Defence Council Bill 1955’, House of
Representatives, Debates, 2 June 1955, pp. 1358–60.
[127]. Ibid., Starr,
p.172.
[128]. W Wright,
Thesis, op. cit., p. 96.
[129]. R Jory, ‘Sir Tom broke the mould and a bit of wind as well’, Adelaide Advertiser, 2 November 2013, p. 56.
[130]. S Longstaff
(chair), ‘Democracy
is failing the people’, RN Big Ideas, Australian Broadcasting
Corporation (ABC), 24 October 2019.
[131]. Australia,
Senate, ‘Sales Tax (Exemptions and Classifications) Amendment Bill 1986’, Journals, SJ 130, 7 October 1986. The Coalition supported
the ALP Bill.
[132]. ‘Democracy is
failing the people’, RN Big Ideas, ABC, op. cit.
[133]. Ibid.
[134]. B Joyce, ‘Second
reading speech: Plebiscite (Same-Sex Marriage) Bill 2016’, House of Representatives, Debates, 19 October 2016, p.
2575.
[135]. J Slapin et
al., ‘Ideology, grandstanding, and strategic party disloyalty in the British
Parliament’, op. cit., Footnote 6, p. 17.
[136]. In 2016 the NP
had five senators. NP backbench senators Bridget McKenzie (Vic.) and John
Williams (NSW) crossed the floor, NP senators who reportedly abstained:
ministers Fiona Nash (NSW) and Matthew Canavan (Qld) and backbencher Barry
O’Sullivan (Qld). CLP minister Senator Nigel Scullion (NT) also reportedly
abstained. Australia, Senate, ‘Customs (Prohibited Imports) Amendment (Shotguns and Shotgun
Magazines) Regulation—Proposed Disallowance’, Journals,
SJ 16, 21 November 2016.
[137]. L Bourke, ‘Nationals
walk in late-night Senate revolt over Adler shotgun ban’, Sydney Morning
Herald, 23 November 2016,
p. 4.
[138]. F Chaney,
‘Parliament: our great expectations’, op. cit.
[139]. D Hamer, Can
responsible government survive in Australia?, Second edn, Department of the
Senate, Canberra, 2004, p. 203.
[140]. M Grattan, ‘Washer calls for wheat bill deal’, Age,
8 October 2012, p. 6. Note: Crook sat as an Independent until 8 May 2012.
[141]. Ibid.
[142]. ‘Defeated
Tuckey given a little credit’, Age, 23 August 2010, p. 8.
[143]. C McCauley, ‘Campbell, the gold rebel, puts himself at the extreme centre’ Age, 12 November 1988.
[144]. D Greenslees,
‘High noon for Labor's Wild West maverick’, Australian, 29 November 1995.
[145]. D Hale, ‘Second
reading speech: National Radioactive Waste Management Bill
2010’, House of Representatives, Debates, 18
March 2010, p. 2971.
[146]. Note: Damien
Hale is not included in the study’s floor crossing statistics.
[147]. N Griggs, ‘Second
reading speech: National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010’, House of
Representatives, Debates, 21 February 2011, p. 690. See also N Adlam, ‘Griggs
fights nuclear dump’, Northern Territory News, 22 February 2011, p.
4.
[148]. Australia,
House of Representatives, ‘National
Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010’, Votes and Proceedings, HVP
24, 22 February 2011. The Bill passed both Houses and received Royal Assent on
4 April 2012. See Parliament of Australia, ‘National Radioactive Waste Management Bill 2010 homepage’, Australian Parliament website.
[149]. ‘Dumped
senator slams the party’, Australian, 17 September 2001. Tambling
retired at the 2001 federal election. C Smith, ‘Tambling to retire from politics’, Northern
Territory News, 18 September 2001.
[150]. F Chaney,
‘Parliament: our great expectations’, op. cit., p. 87.
[151]. J Walpole and
R Kelly, The
Whip’s office, Standard Note, SN02892, House of Commons Library, United
Kingdom, 10 October 2008, p. 4. See also UK Parliament, ‘Whips’,
UK Parliament website.
[152]. Ibid.
[153]. ‘The
Whipping system’, The Parliamentary Review, 7 March 2018.
[154]. ‘May’s Deal suffers the biggest Government defeat in modern Commons
history’, Conservativehome blog, 16 January 2019.
[155]. C Bowen, ‘Changes
key to a rejuvenated Labor party’, Weekend Australian, 13 July 2013,
p. 15.
[156]. Ibid.
[157]. Ibid.
[158]. In late
October the party whip was restored to 10 of the 21 MPs, who were
now free to seek re-election as Conservatives. See P Walker, ‘Tories restore party whip to 10 MPs who sought to block no-deal Brexit’, Guardian, 29 October 2019.
[159]. K Lyons, ‘Whips and votes and early polls: what is going on in UK politics?’, Guardian (Australia), 4 September 2019.
[160]. Ibid.
[161]. J Cleverly (@JamesCleverly), ‘It is a very long-standing convention that an MP who
votes to remove executive power from their own government and hand it to the
opposition has the party whip removed’, tweet, 3 September 2019.
[162]. P Cowley,
‘What makes a Tory MP rebel–and what are their red lines on Brexit?’, op. cit.
[163]. McKeown,
Lundie and Baker, op. cit., p. 4.
[164]. D Humphries, ‘Joyce falls silent on Telstra
privatisation’, op. cit.
[165]. F Chaney,
‘Parliament: our great expectations’, op. cit., p. 87.
[166]. R Broadbent, ‘Adjournment:
parliamentary conduct’, House of Representatives, Debates, 12
September 2019, p. 69.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
Creative Commons
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Entry Point for referral.