Broadcasting Services Amendment (Advertising for Sports Betting) Bill 2013

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page

Broadcasting Services Amendment (Advertising for Sports Betting) Bill 2013

Introduced into the Senate on 15 May 2013

Sponsor: Senator Di Natale

Overview

1.1        This bill seeks to impose restrictions on the broadcasting of material relating to betting on sports. The bill proposes to amend the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 to introduce restrictions on what the holders of commercial and subscription television broadcasting licences and commercial radio licences may broadcast with regards to sports wagering. In particular, it would:

1.2        The committee notes that the Joint Select Committee on Gambling Reform is currently conducting an inquiry into the advertising and promotion of gambling services in sport.[3]

Compatibility with human rights

1.3        The bill is accompanied by a self-contained statement of compatibility which states that while the bill places limits on freedom of expression, the proposed restrictions are a permissible limitation.

Rights of the child

1.4        The committee notes that, in addition to the freedom of expression issues, the focus of the bill on protecting the rights and interests of children may also promote the rights guaranteed under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.

Freedom of expression

1.5        Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) guarantees the right to freedom of expression, which includes the freedom to seek, impart and receive ideas and information through different media. The guarantee includes the freedom to engage in commercial speech and to receive information of a commercial nature. The rights guaranteed by the ICCPR are not directly enjoyed by corporations, so many of those who wish to engage in commercial speech relating to betting will not be able to directly invoke this right. However, there may be individuals engaged in the business who wish to advertise, and they would be able to invoke the right. In addition, the rights of viewers or listeners to receive such information would be directly affected by the restrictions posed by the bill.

1.6        In order to justify a limitation on the exercise of freedom of expression, it must be shown that it is (i) aimed at achieving a purpose which is legitimate; (ii) based on reasonable and objective criteria, and (iii) proportionate to the aim to be achieved. That assessment will generally involve a consideration of whether there are other less restrictive ways of achieving the objective.

1.7        The explanatory memorandum states that:

In recent times, the nexus between sports wagering companies and broadcasters has become more entrenched, leading to more advertisements, the promotion of live odds during games, and the appearance of bookmakers as guests during sporting broadcasts. This unmistakable increase has caused significant debate over the future of sport and has caused a high level of concern in the community.

Due to the popularity of sports broadcasts with children and families and the potential for harm inherent in gambling products, there is consensus amongst academic experts and the public that steps should be taken to minimise the exposure to children of gambling promotions.[4]

1.8        The statement of compatibility states that the bill 'has a public health purpose in limiting exposure to children and adults of material potentially leading to harmful behaviour.'[5] It further notes that 'this restriction is in line with other restrictions on broadcast media made for public convenience and protection, including restrictions in time and content relating to other adult-oriented material'.[6]

1.9        The committee accepts that protecting children from exposure to advertising that may have an adverse impact on their subsequent behaviour, including possibly developing harmful gambling habits, is a legitimate objective under the ICCPR.

1.10      The committee notes that the bill does not propose a complete prohibition on the advertising of betting services (other than numerical odds), and is designed to limit the exposure of children to such material while still allowing the advertising material to be broadcast at times when children are less likely to be watching or listening. These restrictions on advertising during, immediately before and after live broadcasts, and before 9pm appear to be tailored to achieving a specific goal. However, it is not clear why there is a complete ban proposed on the broadcasting of numerical odds at any time.

1.11             The committee considers that the bill does not appear to give rise to human rights concerns.

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page