Not-for-profit Sector Freedom to Advocate Bill 2013

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page

Not-for-profit Sector Freedom to Advocate Bill 2013

Introduced into the Senate on 13 March 2013
Portfolio: Finance and Deregulation

1.1        This bill seeks to make an agreement between a Commonwealth agency and a not-for-profit (NFP) organisation void if it includes any requirement that restricts or prevents the organisation from commenting on, advocating support for or opposing a change to any Commonwealth law, policy or practice. In short, the bill seeks to prohibit the use of 'gag clauses' in NFP funding agreements by the Commonwealth.

Compatibility with human rights

1.2        This bill is accompanied by a statement of compatibility that forms part of the explanatory memorandum to the bill. It identifies that the bill engages and promotes the right of freedom of expression under article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as:

The Bill will prevent the Commonwealth from including clauses in agreements that prevent or restrict NFP entities from advocating on Commonwealth policy issues.[1]

1.3        It concludes that the bill does not limit any rights and is therefore compatible with human rights.

Freedom of expression

1.4        Article 19(2) of the ICCPR provides:

Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

1.5        The bill, in seeking to prevent Commonwealth contracts from restricting NFPs from 'commenting on, advocating support for or opposing a change to any matter established by law, policy or practice of the Commonwealth', appears to promote the right to freedom of expression.

Right to take part in public life

1.6        The bill also appears to promote the right to participation in public affairs as contained in article 25 of the ICCPR.  This article provides that every citizen has the right and the opportunity 'to take part in the conduct of public affairs, directly or through freely chosen representatives'. As the UN Human Rights Committee has noted:

In order to ensure the full enjoyment of rights protected by article 25, the free communication of information and ideas about public and political issues between citizens, candidates and elected representatives is essential. This implies a free press and other media able to comment on public issues without censorship or restraint and to inform public opinion. It requires the full enjoyment and respect for the rights guaranteed in articles 19 [free speech], 21 [peaceful assembly] and 22 [freedom of association] of the Covenant, including freedom to engage in political activity individually or through political parties and other organizations, freedom to debate public affairs, to hold peaceful demonstrations and meetings, to criticize and oppose, to publish political material, to campaign for election and to advertise political ideas.[2]

Right not to be subjected to arbitrary interference with privacy

1.7        Clause 5(2) of the bill provides that a Commonwealth agreement can restrict a NFP entity from disclosing confidential or personal information. Confidential information means information that would found an action for breach of confidence, disclose trade secrets or be likely to prejudice national security,[3] while personal information has the same meaning as in the Privacy Act 1988. While this limits freedom of expression it appears to do in limited way and promotes the right to privacy as guaranteed by article 17 of the ICCPR.

1.8                 The committee considers that the bill does not give rise to issues of incompatibility with human rights.

Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page