Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Environment
Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Moratorium on Aquifer
Drilling Connected with Coal Seam Gas Extraction) Bill 2013
Introduced into the House of Representatives
on 11 February 2013
By:
Mr Katter MP
1.1
This bill seeks
to amend the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
to make it an offence for a person to drill through or into an acquifer for the
purposes of coal seam gas extraction. The offence will only be valid for two
years following commencement of the relevant clause. The amendment is stated to
not apply if the action is taken to facilitate safer coal mining. The penalty that may be imposed in
relation to the offence is $200,000 for an individual and $2 million for a
body corporate
Compatibility with human
rights
1.2
The bill is
accompanied by a statement of compatibly which reproduces the template provided
by the Attorney-General's Department without making specific reference to the
bill or to specific
rights that might be affected by the bill.
The statement concludes by stating that the bill is compatible with human
rights.
Right
to respect for one’s home/right to health/right to water
1.3
A number of
concerns have been expressed about the consequences of coal seam gas mining and
its impact on surrounding locations and water supplies. The bill might be seen
as promoting the right of persons not to have their homes unlawfully or
arbitrarily interfered with under article 17 of the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights. International human rights law has accepted that this
right can provide some protection against pollution that affects a person’s
quiet enjoyment of their home and also extends to any damage to residential
property caused by subsidence that might result from such mining.
1.4
To the extent
that this bill seeks to address concerns about pollution, it might also be
viewed as contributing to the attainment of the right of persons to the highest
attainable standard of health guaranteed by article 12 of the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). To the extent that
it seeks to avoid contamination of water supplies, the bill might also be
viewed as contributing to the fulfilment of the right to an adequate standard
of living (including the right to water) guaranteed by article 11 of the
ICESCR.
1.5
The
committee considers that this bill does not appear to give rise to human rights
concerns.
1.6
The
committee intends to write to Mr Katter, noting that the statement of
compatibility fails to identify specific rights which may be promoted or
limited by the bill and that it is a requirement of the Human Rights
(Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 that substantive statements of
compatibility be supplied even in cases where the effect of the proposed
legislation is to promote rather than limit the enjoyment of a relevant right.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Top
|