Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Coalition committee members' additional comments
The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA)
1.1
Australia currently regulates the provision of online gambling services
through the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA), which was enacted by
the Howard Government in 2001.
1.2
The Coalition recognises ongoing concern in the community about
Australians being able to access casino-type games online. There is a risk for
people accessing these sites. The sites are based overseas and there is no
guarantee of authenticity, probity or recovery of winnings. The sites can be
accessed by minors and problems gamblers and there is also no guarantee of
responsible gambling practices such as counselling and self-exclusion. These
overseas providers do not pay tax nor create employment in Australia.
1.3
Coalition committee members heard concerns raised during the inquiry
that the current IGA legislation is not adequately enforced. Given the
effectiveness of the IGA is to be examined by a Coalition policy committee,
Coalition members of the Gambling Reform Committee have not yet formed a
conclusive view on the operation of the IGA.
1.4
In November 2011, the Coalition launched a policy discussion paper on
gambling reform and established a working group to consult with industry, state
and territory governments, experts and the wider community to investigate
policy options that effectively address problem gambling. Online gambling is
included in this process and the Coalition is seeking comment on the
effectiveness of current legislation, whether to strengthen legislation and
whether changes to legislation will assist problem gamblers to overcome their
addiction. The Coalition will complete this process before reaching a final
position on any changes to current gambling laws to assess the effectiveness of
the legislation and the effect of any changes on Australian consumers. It is
expected that the Working Group will report back to the Leader of the
Opposition by the end of February 2012.
Financial transaction controls
1.5
As noted in the Coalition policy discussion paper, views and comment are
being sought on the capacity of lawmakers to cooperate with financial
institutions as a way of better enforcing the current prohibitions regarding
overseas online gambling sites.
Prohibiting the offering of credit to gamblers
1.6
During the inquiry, the committee heard about a recent case involving a
customer of a betting agency with a mental illness who was provided with credit
worth tens of thousands of dollars. Only later did it become evident that he
was unable to repay the debt.[1]
1.7
As part of the policy discussion paper and working group launched in
November 2011, the Coalition is currently seeking stakeholder comments on the
Commonwealth prohibiting gambling providers offering credit in any form to
gamblers.
1.8
As part of this consultation, the Coalition believes there should be an
exemption for traditional bookmakers to continue to allow 'credit betting'
(i.e. 'laying off') as this is often part of a bookmaker's professional
business practice. In addition, current arrangements for VIPs in Australian
casinos would be permitted.
Advertising of gambling products
1.9
Coalition committee members believe that while gambling is a legitimate
industry, there should be fair and reasonable limits to the advertising of
gambling.
1.10
The practice of promoting 'live odds' during the broadcast of sporting
events is a recent development of concern. The committee heard how the
increasing promotion of live odds exposes vulnerable groups, such as those with
a gambling problem or children, to gambling products.
1.11
As part of the policy discussion paper and working group launched in
November 2011, the Coalition is seeking comments on the prohibition of the
promotion of live odds during the broadcast of a sporting event while that
event is in play. However, live odds updates could still be given during
half-time or breaks in play. This would ensure that legitimate advertising of
betting services would still be permitted but at the same time, promotional
activity would not interfere with the enjoyment of a sporting event.
1.12
Due to their fundamental link with wagering, the Coalition believes the
thoroughbred, harness and greyhound racing industries should be exempt from
such measures.
Conclusion
1.13
The Coalition will reach a final position on any changes to gambling
laws following completion of the working group process.
Mr Josh Frydenberg MP |
Mr Steven Ciobo MP |
|
|
Senator Chris Back |
|
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Top
|