Answers to Questions on Notice
|
Download All
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Rule of Law Institute: Answer to question 001-002 from Senator O'Neill and Mr Hill: Funding and membership - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 15 November 2021)
|
|
2
|
|
Litigation Lending: Answer to question 001: Class actions unlikely to proceed under the Bill - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
3
|
|
Ai Group: Answer to question 001 - 004: Senator O'Neill + Mr Hill - Consultation process, lobbyists, constitutionality of the bill, non-shareholder class actions - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
4
|
|
Australian Instituted of Company Directors: Answer to question 001 - 003: Senator O'Neill + Mr Hill - Minimum returns, US Chamber of Commerce, criteria for judicial consideration - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
5
|
|
Phi Finney McDonald: Answer to question 001 - 002: Cases that would not have proceeded, proposed additions to criteria - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
6
|
|
Association of Litigation Funders of Australia: Answer to question 001 - 002: Section 601LG(3), cases that would not have proceeded - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
7
|
|
Maurice Blackurn: Answer to question 001 - 002 - Senator O'Neill & Mr Hill: Cases that would not have proceeded, managed investment scheme structure - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
8
|
|
Omni Bridgeway: Answer to question 001: Class actions funded by Omni Bridgeway that may be unviable with minimum 70 per cent return - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
9
|
|
ASIC: Answer to written question 001 - Senator O'Neill: How the amendments would impact ASIC's work - taken on written notice on 13 November 2021 (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
10
|
|
Shine Lawyers: Answer to question 001 - 004 - Mr Hill, Mr Wallace, Senator O'Neill: Cases that would not have proceeded, additional clauses, common fund orders - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November 2021 (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
11
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: Answer to question from Mr Hill - Solicitor-General, sign-off, constitutionality - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 15 November 2021)
|
|
12
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: Answer to question from Mr Hill - Solicitor-General, legal advice, and constitutionality - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
13
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: Answer to question from Mr Hill - assurances of constitutionality - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
14
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: Answer to question from Senator O'Neill - frequency of constitutional concerns relating to bills - taken on notice from the public hearing on 12 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
15
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: ORIGINAL Answer to written question 001 from Senator O'Neill - details of legal advice regarding constitutionality of the bill - see #18 for revised answer - taken on notice 15 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
16
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: Answer to written question 002 from Senator O'Neill - US Chamber Institute for Legal Reform, Stuart Clark - taken on notice 15 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
17
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: Answer to written question 003 from Senator O'Neill - freedom of information, correspondence with Mr Clark - taken on notice 15 November (received 16 November 2021)
|
|
18
|
|
Attorney-General's Department: REVISED Answer to written question 001 from Senator O'Neill - see #15 for original answer - details of legal advice regarding constitutionality of the bill - taken on notice 15 November (received 2 December 2021)
|