Foreign Proceedings (Prohibition of Certain Evidence) Amendment Bill 1976


Bills Digest no. 73 1976

Foreign Proceedings (Prohibition of Certain Evidence) Amendment Bill 1976

This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the Bill.


Passage History
Contact Officer & Copyright Details

Passage History

Foreign Proceedings (Prohibition of Certain Evidence) Amendment Bill 1976

Date introduced: 7 December 1976

House: House of Representatives


The purpose of the Bill is to amend the Foreign Proceedings (Prohibition of Certain Evidence) Act 1976 to limit the operation of the Act and to provide for parliamentary scrutiny of orders made by the Attorney-General.


Clause 3 amends section 3 of the Act to exclude the Privy Council, when hearing appeals from Australian courts, from the foreign tribunals in respect of which the Attorney-General may make orders.

Clause 4 amends section 4 of the Act

(a) by amending paragraph 4 (1) (a) to limit the exercise of the Attorney-General s powers, where the ground for exercising those powers is that a foreign tribunal is exercising jurisdiction contrary to international law or comity, to the making of orders relating to proceedings in that tribunal;

(b) by repealing sub-section 4 (2) which provides that the validity of the exercise of the Attorney-General s powers is not challengeable in any court;

(c) by inserting a new sub-section 4 (2) which provides a link between section 5 which gives the Attorney-General power to make prohibition orders and section 4 which specifies the grounds on which those powers may be exercised.

Clause 5 amends section 6 of the Act to ensure that publication in the Gazette constitutes service rather than being deemed to be service as in the existing provision.

Clause 6 inserts a new section 6A which. provides that section 48 of the Acts Interpretation Act applies to orders made by the Attorney-General. The effect is that orders must be tabled within fifteen sitting days after they are made, will become void if they are not so tabled and may be disallowed in the same manner as regulations.

Clause 8 provides that an Australian court or tribunal cannot require a person to act in contravention of an order made by the Attorney-General.

Contact Officer and Copyright Details

Law and Government Group
8 December 1976
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services

This paper has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Information and Research Service, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.

IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public.

ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2006

Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties.

Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2006.

Back to top