16
May 2023
PDF version [280KB]
Dr Susan
Love
Social Policy
The Government
announced on 13 February 2023 that it would fulfil an election commitment
and move Temporary Protection visa (TPV) and Safe Haven Enterprise visa (SHEV)
holders onto permanent visas.
It is implementing this by allowing eligible visa holders
to apply for a Resolution
of Status (RoS) visa, which is an existing permanent humanitarian visa.
This is enabled through changes to the Migration Regulations
1994, primarily via the Migration Amendment
(Transitioning TPV/SHEV Holders to Resolution of Status Visas) Regulations 2023
instrument. TPV holders were previously not able to apply for any visa other
than a subsequent TPV or SHEV, and while SHEV holders do have a pathway
to apply for certain permanent visas, in practice, very
few have met the eligibility criteria.
This quick guide provides an overview of this policy
measure, including who is eligible, what entitlements the permanent visa will
provide, and how much the measure is expected to cost.
Who is eligible?
The measure applies to a group of people known as the ‘asylum
legacy caseload’ who arrived in Australia as unauthorised maritime arrivals
(by boat without a visa) between 13 August 2012 and the end of December 2013,
prior to the Coalition Government’s Operation
Sovereign Borders measures coming into effect. (Some individuals whose
arrival dated back
to 2008, but whose Protection visa applications were not finalised before
19 July 2013, are also included.) Anyone subsequently arriving irregularly by
boat is subject to transfer to an offshore processing centre. The Operation
Sovereign Borders measures included
legislation that re-introduced TPVs and introduced SHEVs.
The total number of people in the ‘legacy caseload’ is
about 31,000 as at March 2023.
Over 19,000 of these people hold TPVs and SHEVs. TPVs
expire after 3 years, and SHEVs after 5 years. Holders must therefore
re-apply for new visas periodically. People in the caseload are therefore at
various stages of the visa application or re-application process. The table
below, from a response to a Senate Estimates Question on Notice on 13 February
2023, summarises the categories within the caseload that may be eligible for an
RoS visa.
TPV/SHEV cohorts |
Size of cohort at 8 February 2023 |
Undecided initial TPV/SHEV applicants in Australia |
1,581 |
TPV/SHEV holder with an on-hand, undecided subsequent
application for TPV/SHEV |
10,933 |
TPV/SHEV holder (no subsequent application on hand) |
8,219 |
Former TPV/SHEV holders whose visas have expired |
547 expired onshore
118 expired offshore |
Refused a TPV/SHEV and at merits or judicial review |
613 merits review
4,922 judicial review |
Source: Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Answers to Questions on Notice,
Home Affairs Portfolio, Supplementary Budget Estimates 2022–23, 13 February
2023, Question SE23-034.
Eligible people will continue to be allowed to apply for a
TPV or SHEV, whether they are on a Bridging visa or are an unlawful non-citizen
(without a valid visa). Applicants in any of these processes who are found to
meet the criteria for a TPV or SHEV will have their application treated as an
application for an RoS visa. This includes situations where the minister may
allow a subsequent application to be made – for example, if new protection
claims arise. Further detail is provided in the Explanatory
Statement to the legislative instrument.
What about people who are not
eligible?
People who have had their visa cancelled or refused will
not be eligible to apply for an RoS visa. Evidence given at the Senate
Estimates hearing on 13 February 2023 (p. 100) stated that 2,531 applicants
had their applications refused with no ongoing matters. According to the
Department of Home Affairs RoS fact
sheet:
If you do not engage protection obligations, you are not
awaiting a merits or judicial review outcome, and you have exhausted all
avenues to remain in Australia, you are expected to depart Australia
voluntarily and may be provided assistance to depart.
People who do engage Australia’s protection obligations
(and therefore cannot return to their home country), but fail a character or
security test, may be considered for third-country resettlement (Senate
Estimates evidence, p. 94).
‘Transitory
persons’ brought to Australia from regional processing countries (Papua New
Guinea and Nauru) for medical treatment – around 1,100 people – and transitory
persons still in those countries do not form part of the legacy caseload and
are not eligible for the pathway.
How does the Resolution of Status
visa work?
The RoS visa is a humanitarian visa that grants permanent
residence. It has existed in the Migration Regulations since 1997 in
various forms. A reworked form was introduced in 2008
to provide permanent protection when the Rudd Government ended TPVs and certain
temporary humanitarian visas. (Further detail and background can be found in
the 2022 policy brief by the Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, Temporary
Protection visas in Australia: a reform proposal.)
About 1,000 RoS visas were granted following the 2008
measures, mostly in the first year. The numbers were counted towards the
Humanitarian Program total – most had already been included, because TPVs also
counted towards the program, and people were not counted twice (Department
of Immigration and Citizenship annual report 2008–09, pp. 85–86 and Annual report 2010–11, pp. 119–120).
This time, many more people will be eligible for RoS
visas, and the Government is not taking the same approach of counting RoS visas
towards the Humanitarian Program. A departmental official confirmed in a Senate
Estimates hearing on 13 February 2023 that the new RoS visa ‘does not
impact on the humanitarian program intake’ (p. 95). For reference, in the Humanitarian
Program planning figures for 2022–23, there are 13,750 places (plus an
additional 4,125 places for Afghan nationals), 1,500 of which are allocated to
the onshore protection component (permanent Protection visas).
The application requirements for the RoS visa do not
include assessment of a person’s protection
claims (determination of refugee status). This means that TPV and SHEV
holders (who have already undergone this process) will not have to re-submit
evidence for their protection claims in order to apply for an RoS visa.
However, this also means it is necessary to leave the TPV and SHEV in place:
people whose protection claims are still being considered as part of a TPV or
SHEV application will need to complete that process.
What services will RoS visa holders
be able to access?
The RoS visa grants permanent resident status, and
therefore entitlement to full access to social security. It is considered a refugee
visa for the purposes of the Social
Security Act 1991, and holders are therefore
exempt from residence
requirements and waiting periods for payments. Permanent humanitarian
visa holders are entitled to Commonwealth
Supported Places in higher education and student loans.
In comparison, people on temporary visas or Bridging visas
do not have the same entitlements and access
to services as people on
permanent visas. Most do not have access to social security payments and must
pay full fees if they wish to enrol in higher education. While TPV and SHEV
holders have some concessions as humanitarian visa holders – for example, access
to Medicare and the Adult
Migrant English Program – these are still quite limited.
Only offshore Refugee and some Global Special Humanitarian
visa holders are eligible for the Humanitarian
Settlement Program. The core program is intended to help people during
their initial settlement in Australia, so it is not directed at people who have
already been living in the community.
However, the RoS visa provides the same access to the
Humanitarian Settlement Program’s Specialised
and Intensive Services (SIS) as TPV and SHEV holders receive. TPV, SHEV and
RoS visa holders ‘must be referred to SIS within 5 years from the date of their
initial visa grant’. RoS visa holders will also continue to have access to
services through the Program
of Assistance for Survivors of Torture and Trauma.
Other entitlements of permanent residency include access
to the National Disability Insurance Scheme,
becoming eligible to apply for Australian
citizenship, and being able to sponsor
family members through the Migration Program.
The Government has recently removed
a processing priority, which directed that Family visa applications where
the sponsor arrived in Australia as an unauthorised maritime arrival were to be
given the lowest priority. This previous setting effectively meant that such
applications would never be assessed, given the large numbers of applications
awaiting processing.
Permanent residents are also able
to sponsor family members through the ‘split
family’ provisions of the Global Special Humanitarian visa (subclass 202);
however, the Migration
Regulations 1994 still include a
restriction that a proposer must not be an unauthorised maritime arrival who
arrived after 13 August 2012 (see subregulation 202.211(2) for the criteria to
be satisfied for the application for a subclass 202 visa and subregulation
2.07AM(5), which essentially describes a person as a member of the legacy
caseload).
What will it cost?
Pre-election
costing of the policy commitment to end TPVs and SHEVs indicated a negative
impact on the underlying cash balance of $407 million over the 4 years from
2022–23 (p. 9). The 2023–24
Budget (p. 162) revised this to $732.5 million over 5 years from 2022–23 to
provide for increases in payments for government services and benefits to RoS
visa holders.
The announcement of 13 February included that $9.4 million
over 2 years will be allocated for legal assistance to help people with their
applications. The Senate Estimates evidence confirms this amount is additional
to the pre-election costing, coming from within existing resources
(p. 95). Service providers for this legal assistance are listed in the RoS
visa fact
sheet.
There is no charge for applying for an RoS visa.
Are TPVs and SHEVs being fully
‘abolished’?
The Labor Party’s 2021
National Platform included a policy to ‘abolish Temporary Protection Visas
and Safe Haven Enterprise Visas and transition eligible refugees onto permanent
visa arrangements’ (p. 123). Its costings
of policy commitments issued ahead of the 2022 election included an item to
‘abolish TPVs and SHEVs and create a new permanent visa’ (p. 8). However, by
the time the policy’s implementation was announced in February 2023, the
language had shifted to providing ‘a
permanent visa pathway’ for TPV and SHEV holders, rather than abolishing
the visas themselves.
The TPV and the SHEV are provided for in the Migration Act 1958
(sections 35A(3) and 35A(3A)). This means that, unlike most other visas, they
cannot be fully abolished without passing a Bill to amend the Act. Most other
visas can be amended or repealed (or new visas created) through instruments to
amend the Migration Regulations, as the Government has done in providing for
the transition process. When the use of TPVs was ended in 2008, the provision
for TPVs remained in the Act, despite being repealed from the
Regulations.
As noted above, the pathway set out in the recent changes
means that the TPV and the SHEV will remain in place in the legislation. Some
people will still need to submit new or further TPV or SHEV applications for consideration.
However, people currently on a TPV or SHEV who make a valid application for an
RoS visa will have their TPV or SHEV extended until the application is decided
– the 3 or 5-year expiry will no longer apply in this case, so subsequent
applications (and associated re-submissions of protection claims) will not be
needed.
The Home
Affairs website states that the majority of the caseload will be processed ‘within
12 months of processing commencement’.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
Creative Commons
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Entry Point for referral.