Dr Matthew Thomas and Geoff Gilfillan
The labour market for youth aged 15 to 24 years deteriorated
substantially after the onset of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008 and has
only recently shown signs of recovery. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS)
data show that the youth unemployment rate rose sharply from its most recent
low of 7.6 per cent in August 2008 (in seasonally adjusted terms) to 12.2 per
cent in May 2009. The youth unemployment
rate then rose to 14.5 per cent in November 2014 but has since fallen to 12.0
per cent in March 2016. See graph below.
Unemployment rate for people aged
15 to 24 years (seasonally adjusted data)
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Labour force,
Australia, cat. no. 6202.0, ABS, Canberra, March 2016.
Young people appear to have borne the brunt of softening in
the labour market since early 2008. In contrast to people in other age groups,
employment for people aged 15 to 19 years contracted by 125,000 between January
2008 and March 2016 and employment for those aged 20 to 24 years only grew by
23,000. See graph below.
Change in employment by age group
(original data) — January 2008 to March 2016
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), ABS, Labour
force, Australia, detailed—electronic delivery, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001,
ABS, Canberra, March 2016.
Youth employment measures
In response to the problem of youth unemployment, the
Government introduced a youth employment strategy as a part of the 2015–16
Budget. This year’s Budget includes
a Youth Employment Package which consists of two major new youth employment
measures and the revision of the Work for the Dole program. The Government has
also abolished the Job Commitment Bonus. As such, the Government’s strategy to
tackle youth unemployment can be seen as being consistent with its stated general
approach to social welfare, under which ‘policies that are found to be
effective will be continued or enhanced, while ineffective policies will be
improved or ceased, with funding made available to new approaches’.
The Job Commitment Bonus will cease from 31 December 2016,
realising savings of $242.1 million over five years.
The Bonus, which was introduced by the Government as a part of the December
2013 Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook and legislated through the Social
Security Legislation Amendment (Increased Employment Participation) Act 2014,
was intended to provide an incentive for long-term unemployed job seekers to
find and take up ongoing paid employment. As was noted in the Bills
Digest for the legislation that enabled the Bonus, the measure was an
experimental one in Australian terms, and one for which the rationale and
likelihood of success was unclear.
The Government has also made changes to the Work for the
Dole Program that are anticipated to generate savings of $494.2 million over
the forward estimates period. Under the measure, the
most job-ready job seekers (Stream A job seekers) will be required to
participate in Work for the Dole after 12 months’ participation in jobactive
rather than six months. This will give these job
seekers a greater opportunity to gain employment or to participate in programs
that may improve their employability before undertaking Work for the Dole, a
program whose impacts in terms of employment outcomes is modest. According to
the findings of a recent evaluation of the impact of the Work for the Dole
program, conducted by researchers from the Australian National University’s Centre
for Social Research and Methods, participation in the program resulted in only a
1.9 percentage point increase in job seekers’ prospects of gaining employment.
The savings from the above measures are being redirected to
‘repair the Budget and fund policy priorities’.
The centrepiece of the Youth Employment Package is the Youth
Jobs PaTH program. This program, which is to be established at a cost of $751.7
million over four years from 2016–17, is intended to provide job seekers aged
under 25 years who have been in receipt of jobactive services for at
least six months with real work experience, and to maximise their prospects of
subsequently gaining employment.
Under the program, following training of up to 6 weeks in
basic employability skills, up to 120,000 job seekers will be offered internship
placements of 4 to 12 weeks over a four-year period. Participation in the
program will be voluntary, with those job seekers who do take part working for 15
to 25 hours per week. Job seekers will receive
$200 a fortnight in addition to their income support payment and businesses
will receive an up-front payment of $1,000 for hosting job seekers. If the host
businesses (or any other employers of job seekers aged under 25 years and in
receipt of jobactive services for at least six months) offer young job
seekers a job, they will be eligible for a wage subsidy of up to $6,500 for
job-ready job seekers and up to $10,000 for disadvantaged job seekers. Under
the changed wage subsidy arrangements discussed below, the subsidies will be
paid on a flexible basis.
As long as young people are provided with quality work
experience and acquire skills for which there is likely to be employer demand,
the program could prove successful. Australian Council of Social Service CEO,
Dr Cassandra Goldie is reported as having argued that the program is more
likely than Work for the Dole to help young people into paid employment, and
emphasised that ACOSS supports the belief that work experience can improve job
While there has been some criticism of the program on the
grounds that it involves businesses paying participants around $4 an hour, an
amount that is substantially less than the minimum wage of $17.29, this does
not account for the fact that the payment is in addition to the job seeker’s
income support payment. That said, a number of
commentators have also expressed concerns that without appropriate safeguards
the program could be used by businesses to replace existing workers or as an
alternative to recruiting young workers at the appropriate wage.
While, as noted above, ACOSS is generally supportive of the program, Cassandra
Goldie shared these concerns, and observed that careful monitoring and
protections would be needed to guard against the risks of worker displacement.
It should be noted that it is difficult to tell from the
budget papers how the Youth Jobs PaTH program will lead to a cost of $751.7
million, as the figures presented only add up to around $244 million.
The description of the wage subsidies component of the measure suggests that
the remaining funding may be made up of existing wage subsidy funding, which
has been reallocated from the jobactive program. If so, then the amount
of the funding reallocated appears to be in the region of $300 million. The
budget papers state that the Government will achieve savings of $204.2 million,
and suggest that these will be gained as a result of the streamlining of wage
subsidy payments, discussed below.
Under another of the Budget’s measures, wage subsidies are
to be made more flexible, with the subsidies to be paid earlier and in a manner
that better suits businesses. The reform of wage
subsidy arrangements is likely to improve employer take-up of the subsidies,
which can help to improve long-term employment outcomes for job seekers.
However, the changes may also increase the risk of some employers taking on job
seekers for shorter periods while the subsidy is available, and then either putting
them off or reducing their hours when the subsidies have run out. Typically,
wage subsidies are either structured with a relatively small up-front payment
and most of the subsidy paid at the conclusion of the payment period or paid in
regular instalments so as to avoid this problem. As such, use of the new wages
subsidy arrangements by employers will need to be monitored and reviewed.
The Budget provides $88.6 million over the forward estimates
period for the expansion of the New Enterprise Incentive Scheme (NEIS) and
initiatives to encourage and assist young people into self-employment.
Under the NEIS, a person is paid an NEIS allowance that is equivalent to the
basic single rate of Newstart Allowance for up to 12 months free of any job
search or mutual obligation requirements, as long as the recipient is
establishing a new business. The expansion of the NEIS to 8,600 places per
annum, and the inclusion of people not in receipt of income support, is a
positive step. A number of evaluations
of the NEIS have been conducted over the years, and, generally speaking, the
findings of these evaluations in terms of self-employment outcomes and flow-on
effects have been positive.
The labour force data in this brief have been taken from the following
product unless otherwise sourced: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Labour force,
Australia, cat. no. 6202.0, ABS, Canberra, March 2016; ABS, Labour
force, Australia, detailed—electronic delivery, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001,
ABS, Canberra, March 2016.
For a brief description and analysis of the measures see M Thomas, ‘Workforce
participation measures’, Budget review 2015–16, 2015–16,
Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2015, pp. 154–156.
M Klapdor and M Thomas, Social Security Legislation Amendment
(Increased Employment Participation) Bill 2014, Bills digest, 48, 2013–14,
Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2014. According to an answer to a question on
notice posed by Senator Sue Lines, ‘as at 15 November 2014, 16,356 individuals
were potentially tracking toward claiming the Job Commitment Bonus, that is,
they were aged 18 to 30 while receiving Newstart Allowance or Youth Allowance
(other) for 12 months or more, but now have left, and are still off, income
support’. Senate Standing Committee on Education and Employment, Answers to
Questions on Notice, Employment Portfolio, Supplementary Budget Estimates 2014–15,
The measure will realise significant savings because there are far
fewer eligible young job seekers at the 12 month point than at the six month
Australian Greens Senator Rachel Siewert has argued that while
participation in the program has been presented as being voluntary, it has the
potential to become compulsory, in effect: ‘people shouldn’t be fooled by the
rhetoric that this is voluntary because if a job service provider puts it into
a person’s job plan it essentially becomes compulsory as penalties apply if
someone doesn’t support their plan’. K Silva, P McDonald and T Taylor, Budget
2016: jobseekers weigh up internship program but experts fear workers could be
exploited, ABC News, 4 May 2016.
For example: R Kelly, P Lewis, M Dockery and C Mulvey, Findings
in the NEIS Evaluation: report prepared for the Department of Employment,
Workplace Relations and Small Business, Centre for Labour Market Research, Murdoch
University, 2001, pp. 62–3 and A Dockery, ‘The
New Enterprise Incentive Scheme: an evaluation and test of the Job Network’,
Australian Journal of Labour Economics, 5/3, 2002, pp. 351–71.
All online articles accessed May 2016.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to firstname.lastname@example.org.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Entry Point for referral.