Research Paper, 2024-25

Reforming Australia's safeguard mechanism: an update

Environment and Energy Environment and Energy

Author

Dr Emily Gibson, Annika Hellsing, and Dr Martin Smith

Go to section

 Executive summary

  • The safeguard mechanism is a central component of Australia’s climate change policy. It was reformed in 2023 to change several elements of the scheme. This paper provides an overview of the safeguard mechanism as it currently operates.
  • The legislative framework for the safeguard mechanism is set out in the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act). The objects of the NGER Act now includes 6 ‘safeguard outcomes’ that contribute to achieving Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets.
  • The safeguard mechanism applies to large facilities that emit over 100,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent each year, which are primarily facilities in the mining, oil and gas extraction, manufacturing, and waste sectors.
  • These facilities must keep net emissions under a threshold, called a baseline. Put simply, calculating a facility’s baseline involves multiplying the output of the facility (its production) by an emissions intensity value that represents the emissions per unit of production. These are called ‘production-adjusted’ baselines.
  • With some exceptions, the emissions intensities used to calculate baselines will move over time from facility-specific values to industry-average values, to encourage production to take place where it is least emissions-intensive. New facilities and new products produced by existing facilities will have baselines calculated using international best practice emissions intensities, as these facilities are expected to have access to the latest technology and practices.
  • The reforms include tailored treatment for emissions-intensive trade-‍exposed industries to ensure they are not competitively disadvantaged by the scheme.
  • A key aspect of the reforms is the introduction of decline rates for baselines, initially of 4.9% per year through to 2029–30, with future decline rates to be set in accordance with Australia’s emissions reduction targets. The reforms also introduce a 5-year rolling emissions budget, with total emissions from safeguard facilities required to reduce over time, and a requirement for net zero emissions from 2049‍–‍50.
  • If a facility emits less than their baseline, they can apply to receive Safeguard Mechanism Credits (SMCs). These tradable credits are expected to provide a financial incentive for facilities to reduce emissions below their baseline.
  • The government has committed to review the safeguard mechanism policy settings in 2026–27 to assess the initial impacts of the reforms.

Introduction

Climate change is affecting weather and climate extremes worldwide. Australia experienced major floods and record dry periods during 2023 and average temperatures have risen by 1.5 ± 0.23 °C since 1910. Global average temperatures were the warmest observed across a 174-year record. While global temperatures are expected to continue increasing in the short term, ‘deep, rapid, and sustained’ reductions in greenhouse gas emissions can slow down further warming and limit associated hazards.[1]

Australia is contributing to global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and transition to net zero. As a party to the Paris Agreement, Australia has committed to reducing emissions by 43% below 2005 levels by 2030 and reaching net zero emissions by 2050.[2] One of the government’s policies to monitor and regulate emissions is the safeguard mechanism which applies to Australia’s largest industrial facilities. Significant reforms were enacted in 2023 that require safeguard facilities to reduce their net emissions in line with Australia’s emissions reduction targets. This paper updates the 2018 Parliamentary Library quick guide on the safeguard mechanism and provides an overview of the scheme as it currently operates.

Additional information on these recent legislative reforms is also available in the Parliamentary Library’s Bills Digest on the Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022. The Parliamentary Library’s publication Australia's climate change policy to 2021: a chronology also provides a timeline of actions that Australia has taken to address climate change and support emissions reduction, including the introduction of the safeguard mechanism.

What is the safeguard mechanism?

The safeguard mechanism is an emissions reduction policy, first introduced as a component of the Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF). The ERF was established in 2014 and is now known (and is referred to in this paper) as the ACCU Scheme. The scheme’s objective is to provide incentives for businesses to reduce their emissions or sequester carbon dioxide and thus contribute to achieving Australia’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction targets.

The scheme has 3 key components:

  • a voluntary scheme to credit emissions reductions, whereby emissions reductions delivered by registered emissions reduction projects using an approved methodology can be issued with credits, known as Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs)
  • a process to purchase emissions reductions, via competitive reverse auctions run by the Clean Energy Regulator, whereby the regulator enters into contracts with successful bidders, and
  • the safeguard mechanism, which requires Australia’s largest GHG emitting facilities to reduce their emissions in line with legislated limits called baselines.

This research paper focuses on the last component, the safeguard mechanism, which was initially introduced to ensure that emissions reductions purchased through the ACCU Scheme are not displaced by significant increases in emissions elsewhere in the economy.

The legislative framework for the safeguard mechanism is set out in Part 3H of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER Act) and multiple legislative instruments. Part 3H was inserted by the Carbon Farming Initiative Amendment Act 2014, which also established the ERF following the repeal of the carbon pricing mechanism. Notably, the safeguard mechanism was the result of amendments put forward by Senator Xenophon and agreed to by the Parliament. The safeguard mechanism commenced on 1 July 2016, and major reforms were legislated in 2023.

Much of the detail relating to the safeguard mechanism is set out in legislative rules, including the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Regulations 2008 and the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Safeguard Mechanism) Rule 2015 (Safeguard Rule).

Background to the safeguard mechanism reforms

In December 2021, the Australian Labor Party, then in Opposition, launched the climate policy platform it would successfully take to the May 2022 federal election. This included increasing the ambition of Australia’s GHG emissions reduction targets and reforming the safeguard mechanism to ensure that it functioned effectively to gradually and predictably reduce emissions from covered industrial facilities. The safeguard mechanism had previously faced criticism that it did not require facilities to actually reduce onsite emissions and would allow economy‑wide emissions to increase.

In June 2022, the Albanese Government updated Australia’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. This increased Australia’s emissions reduction targets to 43% below 2005 levels by 2030 and to net zero by 2050. These targets were legislated in September 2022 following the passage of the Climate Change Act 2022.

In August 2022, the Minister for Climate Change and Energy, Chris Bowen, announced the release of a Safeguard mechanism reforms: consultation paper. The consultation paper provided options for setting and reducing the baselines of facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism. The consultation paper proposed decline rates of between 3.5% and 6% per year through to 2030, with further decline rates to be set in 5-year blocks aligned with updates to Australia’s NDC. The consultation paper also raised a range of other reforms, including the creation of Safeguard Mechanism Credit units (SMCs) to credit below-baseline emissions[3], the treatment of emissions-intensive trade-exposed businesses, banking and borrowing of credits, and changes to the availability of multi-year monitoring periods.

This was followed in October 2022 by exposure drafts of the Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill and an initial legislative rule, as well as an explanatory document.

On 30 November 2022, the minister introduced the Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2022 to the House of Representatives. The Bill was referred to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee for inquiry and report.

On 10 January 2023, the government released the Safeguard mechanism reforms: position paper and 4 draft legislative instruments. The position paper set out the government’s proposed approach, with the draft legislative instruments providing the regulatory detail – as provided for by the amendments in the Bill. The position paper stated that the government intended to finalise the legislative reforms by April 2023, with the reforms and draft rules intended to commence on 1 July 2023 (p. 6).

The Bill passed both houses of Parliament on 30 March 2023, with amendments successfully put forward by the government itself and, after lengthy negotiations, the Australian Greens. The legislative instruments have also been enacted.

The government has published a fact sheet, Safeguard mechanism: about the safeguard mechanism and the reforms, that summarises the final design of the safeguard mechanism.

The safeguard mechanism in operation

This section explains the key components of the safeguard mechanism as it now operates.

Safeguard outcomes

The objects of the NGER Act now include 6 ‘safeguard outcomes’. These embed reform principles into the objects and operation of the Act, and are intended to contribute to the achievement of Australia’s GHG emissions reduction targets (subsection 3(2)). The ‘safeguard outcomes’ (referred to by their paragraph number) are that:

  1. net covered emissions of GHGs from the operation of a designated large facility do not exceed the facility’s applicable baseline
  2. total net safeguard emissions to not exceed a budget of 1,233 million tonnes of CO2-e (Mt CO2-e) for the period 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2030
  3. net safeguard emissions decline to no more than 100 Mt CO2-e for the financial year beginning on 1 July 2029, and zero for any financial year to begin after 30 June 2049
  4. the 5-year rolling average safeguard emissions for each financial year that begins after 30 June 2024 are lower than the past 5-year rolling average safeguard emissions for that financial year
  5. responsible emitters have a material incentive to invest in at-source emissions reductions
  6. the competitiveness of trade-exposed industries is supported as regions transition to activities that drive a ‘global net zero economy’.

The ‘safeguard outcomes’ (other than outcome (a), which was in the original Act) reflect key elements of the reforms. In particular, outcomes (b) to (d) work together to establish a cap on emissions.

The ‘safeguard outcomes’ underpin the making of safeguard rules and key review mechanisms (discussed below in ‘New review mechanisms’). The minister must be satisfied, when making or amending safeguard rules, that the rules are consistent with ‘safeguard outcomes’ (b) to (d) and take ‘safeguard outcomes’ (e) and (f) into account (subsection 22XS(1A)). The minister must also publish their reasons for being so satisfied (subsection 22XS(1B)).

Funding to support clean energy industries and trade-exposed safeguard facilities

The government has committed at least $1 billion in funding via the Powering the Regions Fund to assist safeguard facilities in the manufacturing sector and trade‑exposed industries to reduce their onsite emissions, thereby supporting ‘safeguard outcomes’ (e) and (f). This includes:

What does the safeguard mechanism apply to?

The safeguard mechanism is intended to ensure ‘that net covered emissions of greenhouse gases from the operation of a designated large facility do not exceed the baseline applicable to the facility’ (paragraph 3(2)(a) and section 22XD, NGER Act).

Only large facilities are covered

The safeguard mechanism only applies to ‘designated large facilities’. These are facilities where the total direct GHG emissions from the operation of the facility during a financial year exceed a threshold of 100,000 t CO2-e (section 22XJ, NGER Act; section 8, Safeguard Rule).

In practice, this threshold limits coverage of the safeguard mechanism to large emitting industries such as electricity generation, mining, oil and gas extraction, manufacturing, and waste. The cumulative impacts of multiple small emitters (such as in the agriculture and transport sectors) are not covered by the mechanism.

As a result, the mechanism applies to facilities that collectively account for over half of Australia’s GHG emissions. In 2022–23, the 219 industrial facilities covered by the safeguard mechanism contributed approximately 30% of Australia’s national emissions, while facilities covered by the electricity sectoral baseline contributed another 30% of Australia’s national emissions.[5] However, as discussed further below, the electricity sector is treated differently and has a sectoral baseline.

The mechanism only covers direct emissions

The safeguard mechanism applies to facilities with direct emissions of more than 100,000 t CO2-e a year. Only direct or scope 1 emissions are included in this threshold: that is, GHG emissions released into the atmosphere as a direct result of an activity undertaken at that facility. This includes, for example, direct emissions from fugitive emissions (leaks and other uncontrolled releases) and emissions from fuel combustion, waste disposal and industrial processes such as cement and steel making.

Some scope 1 emissions are not covered. Under section 7 of the Safeguard Rule, these include, for example, legacy emissions from the operation of a landfill facility (that is, emissions from waste deposited at the landfill before 1 July 2016) and emissions that occur in the Greater Sunrise special regime area.[6]

Indirect emissions (known as scope 2 and 3 emissions) are not included in this threshold. Indirect emissions include, for example, emissions associated with the consumption of electricity produced at a separate facility (scope 2 emissions) and emissions embedded in the supply chain of products or final consumption of produced goods (scope 3 emissions).[7]

How are baselines set?

Further details and exceptions to this approach are described in the following sections.

The Clean Energy Regulator (CER) publishes a safeguard baselines table that sets out information relating to emissions baseline determinations, including current and historic facility baselines.

Existing facilities

The requirements for existing facilities are set out in Division 2 of Part 3 of the Safeguard Rule.

Under the reforms, most existing facilities (those operating prior to or in the 2021–22 financial year: section 12, Safeguard Rule) move to new production-adjusted baselines calculated using a hybrid approach, in which there is a progressive transition from facility-specific emissions intensity values to industry average emissions intensity values by 2029–30 (see Table 1). The transition to industry average values ‘provide[s] an incentive for production to occur where it is least emissions-intensive, while facility-specific baselines recognise individual facility circumstances and keeps initial costs low’.[9]

Existing coal mines are subject to a different transition schedule, with facility-specific intensities weighted more heavily, resulting in an equal weighting of default and facility‑specific emission intensities by 2029–30. As explained by the DCCEEW, ‘this approach maintains a robust incentive to reduce the emissions intensity of coal mining operations, while mitigating distributional impacts arising from the differences in emissions intensity across coal mines’.[10]

The baseline emissions number will also be reduced (decline) at a default rate of 4.9% per annum through to 2029–30 (see Table 1). After 2030, decline rates will be set in five-year blocks to align with updated emissions reduction commitments as set in Australia’s Nationally Determined Contribution.[11]

Table 1 Transition proportion and decline factor, 2023–24 to 2029–2030

 

2023–24

2024–25

2025–26

2026–27

2027–28

2028–29

2029–30

Default: Facility-specific ratio

10:90

20:80

30:70

40:60

60:40

80:20

100:00

Default: Facility-specific ratio

(existing coal mines only)

5:95

10:90

15:85

20:80

30:70

40:60

50:50

Decline factor

0.951

0.902

0.853

0.804

0.755

0.706

0.657

Note: The decline factor is 0.049 per annum.
Source: sections 13 and 31, Safeguard Rule.

Existing facilities can apply for an emissions intensity determination to set a facility-specific emissions intensity of an existing production variable (subdivision C of Division 2, Safeguard Rule). Best practice emissions intensity values (explained further below) will apply to existing facilities’ production variables that are not covered by an emissions intensity determination.

Landfills have different characteristics to other existing covered facilities, and their baselines are calculated in a different way (section 30, Safeguard Rule).[12] However, the baselines of landfills will also decline by 4.9% per annum.

New facilities

The requirements for new facilities are set out in Division 3 of Part 3 of the Safeguard Rule.

New facilities are facilities that are covered by the safeguard mechanism for the first time after 1 July 2023. The formula for calculating baselines for new facilities is set out in section 29 of the Safeguard Rule.

Baselines for new facilities (other than landfills) and new products from existing facilities will be set using international best practice emissions intensities. Where determined to date, these are specified in Schedules 1 and 2 of the Safeguard Rule. The DCCEEW describes the rationale for requiring international best practice emissions intensities for new facilities as follows:

New facilities have the opportunity to use the latest technology and build world’s best practice emissions performance into their design. As part of the reforms to the Safeguard Mechanism, the Government decided new facility baselines (emissions limits) will be set at international best practice, adapted for an Australian context. This sends a strong signal to investors that Australia is serious about net zero, and new investments must support this goal.[13]

New facility baselines will also be subject to a default decline rate of 4.9% per annum through to 2029–30.

New gas fields

New gas fields supplying existing liquified natural gas facilities will be considered new facilities (paragraph 20(5)(a), Safeguard Rule). According to the minister, ‘For these fields’ reservoir CO2 emissions, best practice is zero given the existence of low-CO2 fields and opportunities for carbon capture and storage’.[14]

Shale gas extraction facilities

These definitions have the effect that shale gas production, exploration and pilot testing activities are covered under the safeguard mechanism and are required to have a zero baseline (for scope 1 emissions) from commencement. According to a summary provided by the minister, ‘in relation to the Beetaloo basin, all new gas entrants in the basin will be required to have net zero scope 1 emissions from entry’.[15] The amendments and updated Safeguard Rule are not limited to shale gas facilities in the Beetaloo Sub-basin, but would apply to any shale gas extraction facility.[16]

Based on the definition of shale gas extraction facility and as noted in the Explanatory Statement (p. 30), emissions from the extraction and use of shale gas (whether or not the use is in Australia), including scope 3 emissions, are taken into account when determining whether a particular facility is a shale gas extraction facility.

Trade-exposed baseline-adjusted facilities

Subdivisions C–E of Division 5 of the Safeguard Rule set out tailored treatment for emissions‑intensive, trade-exposed (EITE) facilities to ensure that businesses are not competitively disadvantaged and to prevent the risk of carbon leakage.[17] The DCCEEW defines 2 types of EITEs: trade‑exposed facilities (includes facilities whose main production variable is trade exposed) and trade‑exposed baseline-adjusted (TEBA) facilities (a subset of trade‑exposed facilities that also face an elevated risk of carbon leakage).[18] Around 80% of safeguard facilities are classified as trade exposed.[19]

Facilities may apply to the CER to become a TEBA facility and receive a discounted baseline decline rate for up to 3 years (section 39, Safeguard Rule). Discounted decline rates are set based on a ratio of cost impacts, which considers a facility’s earnings or revenue and scheme costs. Scheme costs are calculated by multiplying a facility’s exceedance in a particular year (the amount by which they would emit over their existing baseline) by the default prescribed unit price (an estimated cost of compliance based on the expected cost for a prescribed carbon unit, which includes ACCUs and SMCs).

The safeguard mechanism fact sheet explains how discounted decline rates are set for manufacturing and non‑manufacturing facilities:

Manufacturing will use scheme cost as a percentage of facility Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT), reflecting the value-added nature of their margins:

  • assistance will commence at 3% and the minimum baseline decline rate will be available at 10%; and
  • the minimum baseline decline rate will be 1% each year.

Non-manufacturing facilities will use scheme cost as a percentage of facility revenue:

  • assistance will commence at 3% and the minimum baseline decline rate will be available at 8%; and
  • the minimum baseline decline rate will be 2% each year. [20]

A consultation process to seek feedback on draft EBIT guidelines and the approach for calculating the default prescribed unit price took place between March and April 2024. The final EBIT guidelines were published in June 2024 and the default prescribed unit price was set at $33.13 for 2023–24, following the method outlined by the DCCEEW.

Electricity sector

A single electricity sectoral baseline is applied to all electricity generators connected to one of Australia's 5 main electricity grids (the National Electricity Market, the South West interconnected system, the North West interconnected system, the Darwin to Katherine network, and the Mount Isa-Cloncurry supply network).[21]

The electricity sector baseline is set at 198 Mt CO2-e. This baseline represents the high point in annual emissions from the electricity sector between 2009–10 and 2013–14.

This baseline is considerably higher than the total reported scope 1 emissions from grid‑connected generators in 2022–23 (137.2 Mt CO2-e).[22] While the electricity sector has historically been the highest emitting sector, emissions in the sector have reduced over time as the proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources has increased. Electricity sector emissions are projected to continue declining.[23] In the unlikely event that the sectoral baseline was exceeded, individual facility baselines would be applied to electricity generators.

What if a facility exceeds its baseline?

A responsible emitter has a duty to avoid an ‘excess emissions situation’ (section 22XF, NGER Act). An ‘excess emissions situation’ occurs if a facility’s baseline for a particular financial year is exceeded and the responsible emitter fails to remedy that situation by 1 April in the following financial year. Responsible emitters have the following options to avoid excess emissions:

  • surrender ACCUs or SMCs to reduce net emissions
  • apply to the CER to become a TEBA facility and receive a discounted baseline decline rate
  • apply to the CER to borrow baseline from the following compliance year; this would reduce the future year baseline by the corresponding amount, plus interest (2% for the 2024–25 and 2025–26 financial years and 10% for financial years from 2026–27 onwards)
  • apply to the CER for a multi-year monitoring period to allow additional time to reduce emissions; multi-year monitoring allows a facility to exceed its baseline in one year, as long as average emissions over the period of up to 5 years are below the baseline
  • apply to the CER for an exemption if excess emissions are due to exceptional circumstances, such as a natural disaster or criminal activity.[24]

Safeguard Mechanism Credit units

Safeguard Mechanism Credit units (SMCs) are tradable units that were introduced in the reforms. Responsible emitters may apply to the CER to be issued SMCs if their facility’s emissions are below its baseline in a reporting year, or below its net baseline at the end of a multi-year monitoring period. Each SMC represents one tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions below a facility's baseline. SMCs provide a financial incentive to safeguard facilities to reduce emissions below their baselines and allow for flexibility in meeting compliance obligations. While SMCs will only be issued to responsible emitters, they can be purchased and sold by anyone with an Australian National Registry of Emissions Unit account. It is expected that a market for SMCs will emerge, with SMCs available to buy, sell and surrender from early 2025.

Facilities that reduce their emissions below the coverage threshold (100,000 t CO2-e) will be able to generate SMCs for up to 10 years, ‘as long as they have been previously covered by the safeguard mechanism in accordance with the conditions set out in section 58B of the Safeguard Rules’.[25] The baselines at these facilities will continue to decline.

Some facilities will not be eligible to generate SMCs, including landfills, facilities accessing multi‑year monitoring periods (except for at the conclusion of this period), and facilities with borrowing arrangements in place (subsections 56(3) and 57(3), Safeguard Rule). Long‑term arrangements for landfills will be considered prior to the government’s 2026–27 review of the safeguard mechanism.[26]

SMCs can be surrendered by responsible emitters to meet compliance obligations, sold (including to other safeguard facility operators) or held on to (banked) until 2030. Safeguard facilities can bank an unlimited amount of SMCs to 2030 and use these to meet compliance requirements in any year, regardless of which year they were issued.[27] The government’s 2026–27 review of the safeguard mechanism will consider SMC banking arrangements for post‑2030.[28]

Australian Carbon Credit Units

Safeguard facility operators can also purchase and surrender Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) to offset emissions above their baseline. Facilities that surrender ACCUs equal to more than 30% of their baseline must submit a statement to the CER explaining why onsite abatement has not been undertaken (section 72C, Safeguard Rule).

In order to avoid double counting, Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) projects that solely reduce covered emissions at a safeguard facility can no longer be registered, as these activities will generate SMCs. Existing projects can continue to generate and sell ACCUs, but are not able to enter into new contracts for government purchase of ACCUs.[29]

The government has introduced a cost containment measure to prevent excessive prices of ACCUs and provide certainty to facilities on the maximum compliance costs they could face. Facilities that exceed their baseline are able to purchase ACCUs from the government at a cost of $75 per unit in 2023–24, increasing with the consumer price index plus 2% each year. The government expects there will be sufficient ACCUs and SMCs available in the market below this price, and states that any funds received via this measure will be allocated to the Powering the Regions Fund.[30]

Currently, only domestic carbon credit units can be used to meet compliance obligations. The government may consider whether high‑quality international offsets can be used by safeguard facilities in future years.[31]

Compliance and enforcement

Under the previous safeguard mechanism design, facilities faced penalties for the number of days that they were in an ‘excess emissions situation’, without regard to the quantity of emissions they emitted in excess of their baseline. Now, non-compliant facilities face:

  • a maximum civil penalty of one penalty unit per tonne of excess emissions in the relevant year (section 22XF, NGER Act), or
  • a corresponding infringement notice[32] ‘charged at one-third of the maximum civil penalty to a maximum of 150,000 penalty units’.[33]

The government ‘does not expect any facilities to pay civil penalties or infringement notice charges, as these will be more expensive than the cost of compliance’.[34]

Section 54B of the NGER Act sets out anti-avoidance measures to prevent businesses from defining or re‑defining facilities to avoid obligations, for example, by splitting a large facility into multiple smaller facilities that do not meet the 100,000 t CO2-e emissions threshold.

New review mechanisms

The Climate Change Act 2022 (CC Act) requires the Minister for Climate Change and Energy to deliver an annual climate change statement to Parliament (section 12, CC Act). The statement is required to include, among other things, information on progress made during the relevant year towards achieving Australia’s GHG emissions reduction targets. The statement must also include information on the effectiveness of the Commonwealth’s policies including ‘whether safeguard emissions and net safeguard emissions are declining consistently with the safeguard outcomes’ (paragraph 12(1)(d), CC Act).

The Climate Change Authority (CCA) is required to provide advice to the minister relating to the preparation of the annual climate change statement (section 14, CC Act). The CCA’s advice must also address ‘whether safeguard emissions and net safeguard emissions for the financial year ... are declining consistently with each of the safeguard outcomes’, taking into account:

  • the impact of expanded or new designated large facilities in that year, or expected in future years, and
  • emissions estimates for expanded or new facilities as notified to the CCA by the Environment Minister in regard to the approval of actions under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (paragraph 14(1A)(a), CC Act).

If safeguard emissions, or net safeguard emissions, for the relevant financial year are not declining, the CCA must also provide advice as to whether any amendments to the Safeguard Rules should be made to achieve those ‘safeguard outcomes’ (paragraph 14(1A)(b), CC Act). The minister is then required to undertake public consultation and, if satisfied that the Safeguard Rules need to be amended to achieve the ‘safeguard outcomes’, must amend the Safeguard Rules (paragraph 22XS(1C)(d), NGER Act). The NGER Act imposes a similar obligation on the Secretary of the DCCEEW (subsection 22XS(1D), NGER Act).

There is an existing requirement for the CCA to conduct 5-yearly reviews of the NGER Act and associated legislative instruments (section 76A, NGER Act). The most recent review was published in December 2023 and included the authority’s initial assessment of the safeguard mechanism reforms. The CCA noted that many of its recent recommendations regarding the safeguard mechanism were reflected in the reforms, but that its recommendation for facilities to publish strategies outlining how they will comply with declining baselines was not included. The CCA noted that reporting requirements under the climate-related financial disclosures rules may go some way to addressing this recommendation. The CCA is required to publish its next review of NGER legislation in 2028.

The government has committed to a review of the safeguard mechanism in 2026–27 to assess the initial impacts of the reforms and ensure policy settings are ‘appropriately calibrated’.[35] The scope of the review has been summarised as follows:

The review will consider, among other things, the initial impacts of resetting and declining baselines, including the costs and availability of domestic offsets; the appropriate treatment of international units; the suitability of arrangements for emissions-intensive, trade-exposed activities; whether the cost containment measure is sufficient; and treatment of flexibility mechanisms beyond 2030, such as banking and borrowing and multi-year monitoring periods. The review will also have regard to important issues of sovereign capacity for the transition to net zero, the impacts on recent investments, technology readiness, progress with carbon border adjustment mechanisms and efficiency of Australian production against international competitors.[36]

The CER is required to publish information on its website about safeguard facilities by 15 April each year (subsections 24(3A) and 24(3B), NGER Act). This includes details about facility baselines and covered emissions, the number of SMCs issued to each facility (if any), details on any ACCUs and SMCs surrendered (if any), as well as aggregate data about total emissions under the safeguard mechanism. The first tranche of information under the reformed scheme is due to be published by 15 April 2025 and will provide an early insight into the effects of the reforms and their potential impact on Australia's greenhouse gas emissions.

Resources on the safeguard mechanism

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Stephen McMaugh and Dr Edward Fellows for their peer review of an earlier version of this research paper.