31 August 2016
PDF version [336KB]
Geoff
Gilfillan
Statistics and Mapping Section
Executive
summary
Young people bore the brunt of softening in the labour
market in Australia following the impact of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC).
But there is evidence of a gradual improvement in youth labour market indicators
in the 18 months from late 2014 to May 2016.
-
ABS data shows the youth unemployment rate (for those aged 15 to
24 years) rose sharply from its most recent low of 8.7 per cent in March 2008 (in
trend terms) to 11.9 per cent in May 2009. The unemployment rate then rose
steadily to 13.9 per cent in September 2014 but has since fallen to 12.2 per
cent in May 2016.
Young unemployed people account for a disproportionate share
of total unemployment in Australia when compared with their share of the
working age population.
-
unemployed people aged 15 to 24 years accounted for 35.8 per cent
of unemployed people aged 15 to 64 years in May 2016—almost double their share
of the working age population (19.9 per cent) at this time.
One reason for the medium and long term decline in
engagement in full‑time employment of young people is their higher rates
of participation in full‑time education.
-
over three quarters (78.0 per cent) of people aged 15 to 19 years
were engaged in full‑time education in May 2016 compared with 69.9
per cent in May 2008. A similar, but less pronounced, trend is observed for
people aged 20 to 24 years with just under a third (31.9 per cent) engaged in
full‑time education in May 2016 compared with 28.5 per cent in May 2008.
Australia’s youth unemployment rate is below the average for
the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and lower than
many comparable OECD countries.
-
according to data compiled by the OECD, Australia had a youth
unemployment rate of 13.3 per cent in 2014 (for people aged 15 to 24 years)
which was below the OECD average of 15.0 per cent.
The rate of disengagement of young people—measured as the
proportion that are neither engaged in employment, education nor training (or NEET
rate)—climbed quickly from mid‑2008.
-
the rate of disengagement for people aged 15 to 19 years rose
sharply from 6.8 per cent to 9.1 per cent in the 12 months to May 2009, from
where it has gradually and progressively fallen to 5.9 per cent in May 2016.
-
in contrast, the NEET rate for people aged 20 to 24 years shows less
pronounced signs of slowing—increasing steadily from 11.5 per cent in May 2008
to 15.2 per cent in May 2013 before falling slightly to 14.2 per cent in May 2016.
Contents
Executive
summary
Notes on data use
Introduction
Trends in the youth labour market
since the GFC
Unemployment
International youth unemployment rate
comparisons
Employment
Labour force participation
Underemployment
Participation in full‑time
education.
An alternative measure of youth
disengagement.
International NEET rate comparisons
Conclusion
Notes on
data use
The data used in this paper is drawn from Labour Force
Survey (LFS) data produced by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Trend
data is used where available. Trend data combines the smoothing of a seasonal
adjustment process (that removes the effects of regular or systematic calendar
related patterns including seasonal variation) with other statistical
techniques used to reduce the impact of irregular components.
Where only original data estimates are available, 12 month
rolling averages are used to reduce month to month volatility.
Introduction
The state of the youth labour market
receives considerable attention from social and economic policy makers, labour
market economists, politicians and media commentators. One of the major reasons
for the attention is the youth unemployment rate is consistently much higher
than the unemployment rate reported in the media for the population aged 15
years plus.
The youth labour market differs from labour markets for other
age groups for a number of reasons. The major difference is young people are in
the formative stages of their development in terms of acquiring skills, human
capital and employment experience. Young people are also much more likely to be
new entrants to the labour market than older people. This makes them more
susceptible to contractions in demand for labour associated with downturns in
the economy and changes in the business cycle.
The youth labour market today is very different to the one that
existed thirty years ago because a substantial (and growing) proportion of young
people—particularly those aged 15 to 19 years—are engaged in full‑time
study. This limits the ability of this group to participate in the labour
market in a full‑time capacity. But there is evidence of more young
people finding part‑time employment which complements their study
activities and also fits in with employer demands for a more flexible
workforce.
Employers are influenced by a number of factors when making
recruitment decisions including the skills and previous work experience of job
applicants and the cost of labour. While young people in some occupations may
be regarded by many employers as less productive than their older and more
experienced counterparts, they have the advantage of being more attractive due
to their lower wage rates commensurate with their less developed skills and
experience.
More recent experience show that when there is a downturn in
economic activity—for example, since the GFC of 2007 to 2009—employers are more
likely to retain or “hoard” their more experienced and skilled staff
(presumably due to their higher productivity and despite their relatively
higher wages) and are less likely to recruit staff who are less experienced and
less skilled (but also less costly).[1]
ABS data indicates that young people have experienced the
greatest increase in labour shedding since the GFC compared with other age
groups and were more likely to be affected by contraction in full‑time employment
opportunities. This paper:
-
examines movement in unemployment rates and levels for young
people relative to other age groups since the GFC started to impact on the
labour market in mid‑2008
-
sheds light on whether young people have borne the brunt of
weakness in the labour market since the GFC in terms of indicators such as
employment growth (or loss) and labour force participation
-
tracks changes in the proportion of young people that are neither
engaged in employment, education or training (or NEET rate) since the GFC and
-
examines where Australia’s youth unemployment and NEET rates rank
alongside other OECD countries.
Trends in the youth labour market
since the GFC
University of Melbourne economist Jeff Borland highlighted
that young people are more likely to be affected by cyclical events such as the
GFC.
The main effect of an economic downturn is to slow the rate
of inflows into employment. This is especially the case in the initial stages
of a downturn or in a less severe downturn. At any point in time, the young,
who are making the transition from education to work, account for a
disproportionate share of job seekers. So when there is slowing growth in the
rate of creation of new jobs, it is the young who are most adversely affected
by the declining availability of new jobs.[2]
Figure 1 shows the composition of growth in the population
for different age groups between July 2008 and May 2016 in terms of change
in employment, unemployment and people not in the labour force.
The chart shows employment growth was strongest for people aged
25 to 34 years and those aged 55 to 64 years (up by 441,000 and 390,600
respectively). Also of note are the increases in labour inactivity in the
younger age groups as larger numbers either enrolled in full‑time
education or left the labour force for other reasons.
The chart also shows the a decrease in labour market
inactivity for people aged 55 to 64 years as more people either looked for work
or delayed their retirement. Many of these changes are a reflection of
demographic shifts with much larger population growth being recorded for those
aged 25 to 34 years and 55 to 64 years compared with other age groups.
Figure
1: Change in employment, unemployment and labour market inactivity by age—July
2008 to May 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—12 month moving averages)
Unemployment
The labour market for youth aged 15 to 24 years deteriorated
quickly and substantially after the onset of the GFC and has only recently
shown signs of recovery. ABS data shows the unemployment rate for people aged
15 to 24 years rose sharply from its most recent low of 8.7 per cent (in trend
terms) in March 2008 to 11.9 per cent in May 2009. The unemployment rate then
rose more slowly to 13.9 per cent in September 2014 but has since fallen to
12.2 per cent in May 2016 (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Unemployment rate and
number of unemployed people aged 15 to 24 years
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics
(ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6202.0, Table 13 (trend data)
The number
(or level) of unemployed young people shows similar movements—rising from its
most recent low of 182,000 (in trend terms) in March 2008 to its most recent
peak of 290,600 in December 2014—before falling steadily to 258,400 in May 2016
(see Figure 2).
Figure 3 shows a noticeable increase in the unemployment
rate of people in the younger age groups since the GFC compared with more
moderate increases in the unemployment rates of people in older age groups. An
encouraging sign is the unemployment rates for people aged 15 to 19 years and
20 to 24 years have been falling since late 2014.
Figure 3: Unemployment rates by age
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—12 month moving averages)
Figure 4 shows the largest increase in unemployed people by
age group recorded between July 2008 and May 2016 was for those aged 15 to 24
years (up 74,000).
Unemployed people aged 15 to 24 years accounted for 35.8 per
cent of all unemployed people aged 15 to 64 years in May 2016—almost double
their share of the working age population of 19.9 per cent at this time.
Young people also have slightly higher retrenchment rates[3] than people in other age groups with males aged 20 to 24 years having the
highest retrenchment rate at 5.2 per cent in February 2013 followed by males
aged 15 to 19 years at 4.1 per cent. The overall retrenchment rate at this time
was 3.4 per cent.[4]
Figure 4: Change in number of
unemployed people by age—July 2008 to May 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—12 month moving averages)
International
youth unemployment rate comparisons
In 2014 Australia’s youth unemployment rate of 13.3 per cent
was lower than the OECD average of 15.0 per cent but comparable with rates
recorded by the United States and Canada (13.4 per cent and 13.5 per cent
respectively). Australia’s youth unemployment rate was slightly lower than the
rates recorded by New Zealand and the United Kingdom (15.0 per cent and 16.3
per cent respectively). Switzerland, Germany, Norway and Japan recorded rates below
10 per cent (see Figure 5).
Figure 5: OECD youth (15 to 24
years) unemployment rates
Source: OECD Stats (extracted
30 June 2016)
While Australia was ranked in the bottom third of
unemployment rates for the 34 OECD countries assessed, it had the third highest
youth share of total unemployment in 2014 (at 37.0 per cent). By
comparison, the youth share of the civilian population aged 15 years and over
in Australia in 2014 was 16.4 per cent (see Figure 6).
Figure 6: Youth share of total
unemployment and population
Source: OECD Stats (extracted
30 June 2016)
It is notable that countries such as Australia, the United Kingdom,
Sweden and New Zealand all recorded disproportionately very large youth shares
of total unemployment when compared with their youth shares of the total
population.
Employment
Young people aged 15 to 19 years were the only group to
experience employment loss after the GFC started to take effect in mid‑2008.
Employment for people aged 15 to 19 years fell by 87,400 (using a 12 month
rolling average of original data) between July 2008 and May 2016 (Figure 7).
Employment for people aged 20 to 24 years grew marginally by
36,200—due to strong growth in part‑time employment offsetting a decline
in full‑time employment. Between July 2008 and May 2016 full‑time
employment for people aged 15 to 19 years and 20 to 24 years fell by 97,000 and
97,300 respectively.
Figure
7: Change in full and part‑time employment by age group—July 2008 to
March 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—12 month moving averages)
Labour
force participation
The labour force participation rate of young people fell
steadily from mid‑2008 but has recovered slightly since mid to late 2014.
The labour force participation rate of people aged 15 to 19 years fell from
59.7 per cent in July 2008 to 53.2 per cent in May 2014 before recovering
slightly to 53.8 per cent in May 2016 (using a 12 month moving average of
original data). The labour force participation rate of people aged 20 to 24
years behaved in a similar manner—falling from 82.1 per cent in July 2008 to
78.0 per cent in November 2014 before gradually increasing to 79.3 per cent in
May 2016 (see Figure 8).
Figure 8: Australian youth labour
force participation rates
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—12 month moving averages)
Between July 2008 and May 2016 younger people experienced
significant falls in their labour force participation rate and employment to
population ratios. In contrast, people aged between 25 and 54 years enjoyed
relative stability in these measures, while people aged 55 years and over
recorded significant increases (Figure 9).
Strong growth in the employment to population ratio for
those aged 55 to 64 years could be driven by supply factors such as decisions
by many older people to delay retirement due to the negative impact of the GFC
on superannuation balances.
Figure 9: Change in participation
rates and employment to population ratios by age—July 2008 to May 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—12 month moving averages)
Underemployment
The underemployment ratio of young people (or the proportion
of employed people who would prefer more hours of work) is consistently much
higher than rates recorded for other age groups. While underemployment ratios
for people in older age groups grew marginally after July 2008, the increase
for the younger age group was much more pronounced. The underemployment ratio
of people aged 15 to 24 years rose quickly from 11.9 per cent (in trend terms)
in May 2008 to 16.6 per cent in August 2009. The rate increased more steadily
to 20.1 per cent in May 2015 before falling slightly to 19.4 per cent in May
2016 (See Figure 10).
A number of
studies have examined the reasons why some groups are more likely to be
underutilised than others. Supply factors associated with lower rates of labour
force utilisation included level of educational attainment, gender, marital
status, ethnic back ground and Indigenous status. Of these factors lack of
educational attainment had one of the strongest associations with negative
labour market outcomes.[5]
The Melbourne
Institute’s Mark Wooden found that age, gender and ethnic background were strongly
associated with higher rates of detachment, and people working in less skilled
occupations were also more likely to be underutilised.[6] Scott Baum and William Mitchell found that greater educational attainment
increased the likelihood of individuals being adequately employed and reduced
the risk of unemployment. Greater labour market experience—as measured by years
in paid employment—decreases the likelihood of both being unemployed and
underemployed.[7]
Figure 10: Underemployment ratio by
age—February 2000 to May 2016
Source:
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, Cat. 6202.0,
Table 22, (trend quarterly data)
Participation
in full‑time education
Part of the reason for the large increase in labour market
inactivity for those aged 15 to 19 years since the GFC is their greater rates
of participation in full‑time education—perhaps in response to a
deteriorating labour market. Just over three quarters (78.0 per cent) of people
aged 15 to 19 years were engaged in full‑time education in May 2016
compared with 69.9 per cent in May 2008. Similar trends were observed for
people aged 20 to 24 years, though the increase was not as pronounced (See
Figure 11).
Figure 11: Percentage of young people
engaged in full‑time education—May 2000 to May 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM3
(original data for May of each year)
An
alternative measure of youth disengagement
Unemployment rates of young people can be misleading—particularly
for those aged 15 to 19 years—as a substantial proportion of those young people
reporting they are unemployed are also engaged in full‑time education. For
example, ABS Labour Force Survey data shows just under 70 per cent of people aged
15 to 19 years who reported they were unemployed in May 2016 were engaged in
full‑time education.
Perhaps a better indicator for policy makers to gauge the
extent of youth disengagement is the proportion of young people who are not
engaged in employment, education or training (NEET).
Figure 12 shows the composition of the NEET rate in terms of
the proportion of young people who were not attending education full‑time
and unemployed (shown in blue), and the proportion neither attending education
full‑time nor in the labour force (shown in red). The NEET rate is the
sum of the red and blue bars shown in the chart. The NEET rate for those aged
15 to 19 years rose sharply from 6.8 per cent in May 2008 to 9.1 per cent in
May 2009 but has since fallen steadily to 5.9 per cent in May 2016.
Figure 12: NEET rate for people
aged 15 to 19 years—May 2000 to May 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—May of each year)
The proportion of all youth aged 15 to 19 years who report
they are not attending education full‑time and are also unemployed declined
from 4.8 per cent in May 2009 to 2.7 per cent in May 2016. During the same
period, the proportion of this group reporting they are neither in full‑time
education nor in the labour force fell from 4.3 per cent to 3.2 per cent.
A number of factors may have contributed to the decline in
the NEET rate for this age group including:
-
the impact of a discouraged worker effect—where a higher
proportion decide to engage in full‑time education (and not look for
work) in response to declining job prospects
-
perceptions by young people that they need to complete Year 12
and possibly post‑secondary education in order to be competitive in the
job market
-
changes to state and territory government legislative
requirements for young people to stay in school longer or be engaged in some
form of training (also known as Learn or Earn)[8],
and
-
making entitlements to Youth Allowance for people aged up to 17
years contingent upon participation in education or training.[9]
A number of policies have been implemented by state and
territory governments to encourage greater rates of participation by young
people in education. The COAG National Partnership on Youth Attainment and
Transitions set a number of goals including raising Year 12 completion rates,
ensuring all school students remain in school until they complete Year 10, and increasing
the proportion of young people aged 15 to 25 years participating in either study,
training or employment. Entitlement to the Youth Allowance for people up to the
age of 17 years was also tied to participation requirements in education and
training.[10]
The NEET rate for those aged 20 to 24 years rose more
steadily from 11.5 per cent in May 2008 to 15.2 per cent in May 2013 but has
since only fallen marginally to 14.2 per cent in May 2016 (see Figure 13).
Figure 13: NEET rate for people
aged 20 to 24 years—May 2000 to May 2016
Source: Australian Bureau of
Statistics (ABS), Labour Force Survey, cat. no. 6291.0.55.001, LM1
(original data—May of each year)
Unlike the NEET rate for the younger age group, the NEET
rate for people aged 20 to 24 years in 2016 is still well above the rate
recorded in May 2008.
People in this age group may have barriers preventing them
from looking for work, such as involvement in child caring responsibilities,
while a small proportion have a long‑term health condition or disability.
Others are engaged in full‑time education or are travelling overseas
while some may choose to engage in home duties.[11] Young females who are disengaged are more likely to report they are not in the
labour force while disengaged young males are more likely to report they are
unemployed.[12]
International
NEET rate comparisons
In 2014 Australia had the 11th highest NEET rate for people
aged 15 to 19 years out of the 28 OECD countries that provided data. Australia
recorded the same NEET rate (7.2 per cent) as the OECD average for this age
group (see Figure 14). Australian women in this age group had a slightly lower
NEET rate than Australian men (6.8 per cent compared with 7.6 per cent).
Australia’s NEET rate for people aged 15 to 19 years was
similar to the rates for countries such as Canada, New Zealand and the United
States. In contrast, NEET rates for Germany, Norway and the Netherlands were
almost half the rate recorded for Australia.
Figure
14: OECD NEET rates for people aged 15 to 19 years—2014
Source: OECD, Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015.
Australia had the 11th lowest NEET rate (13.2 per cent) for
those aged 20 to 24 years out of 28 OECD countries that provided data. The OECD
average NEET rate for this age group was 17.9 per cent.[13]
Australian men in this age group had a NEET rate of 11.7 per
cent in 2014 while Australian women had a rate of 14.9 per cent. OECD data show
10.7 per cent of Australian women aged 20 to 24 years were neither engaged in
full‑time education nor in the labour force compared with 5.4 per cent of
men in this age group. A higher proportion of Australian men aged 20 to 24
years were not in full‑time education and unemployed (6.2 per cent)
compared with women in this age group (4.1 per cent).
Spain, Greece and Italy had much higher NEET rates for this
age group in 2014 while Germany, Norway and the Netherlands recorded much lower
rates (see Figure 15).
Figure 15: OECD NEET rate for
people aged 20 to 24 years—2014
Source: Education at a glance 2015: OECD indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015.
Conclusion
ABS data shows young Australians were far more likely than
other age groups to experience losses in full‑time employment, and stronger
growth in rates of unemployment and underemployment in the aftermath of the GFC.
Young people have a disproportionately large share of total unemployment
when compared with their share of the working age population.
Employers are more likely to retain or “hoard” their most
experienced and skilled staff when economic activity slows in order to retain
firm-specific human capital and appear more reluctant to offer employment
opportunities to younger inexperienced jobseekers.
There is evidence of increasing rates of attendance in full‑time
education among the younger age group (15 to 19 years) since mid‑2008—perhaps
in response to a softening labour market—as well as statutory requirements to
attend school to an older age.
In contrast to the younger age group, the rate of
disengagement from employment, education and training for those aged 20 to 24
years is still above the rate recorded in mid‑2008.
[1]. PN Junankar,
‘The
impact of the Global Financial Crisis on youth unemployment’, The
Economic and Labour Relations Review, 26(2), 2015, pp. 191-217.
[2]. J Borland, ‘The
Australian labour market: The more things change ...’, The Australian
Economic Review, 48(3), pp. 225–242.
[3]. The number of
persons retrenched in the previous 12 months as a percentage of all people who had
been employed over the same period.
[4] ABS,
Australian Labour Market Statistics, July 2014, cat. no. 6105.0.
[5]. S Baum and W
Mitchell, ‘Adequate
employment, underutilisation and unemployment: an analysis of labour force
outcomes for Australian youth’, Australian Journal of Labour Economics,
11(3), pp. 187–201.
[6]. M Wooden,
‘Underemployment in Australia’, Labour Economics and Productivity, 5(2),
September 1993, pp. 95–110.
[7]. Baum and
Mitchell, op. cit., p. 197.
[8]. While most
state and territory governments had introduced legislation for young people to
stay in school or training up to the age of 17 years by 2009 the law did not
take effect in New South Wales and the ACT until 1 January 2010.
[9]. N Lammas, Beyond
learn or earn, Australian Youth Affairs Coalition (AYAC), Sydney,
November 2012.
[10]. N Lammas, Beyond
learn or earn, Australian Youth Affairs Coalition (AYAC), Sydney,
November 2012.
[11]. ABS, Persons
Not In the Labour Force, Underemployed Workers and Job Search Experience, Australia,
February 2014, cat. no. 6226.0.55.001.
[12]. OECD, Education
at a glance 2015: OECD indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015.
[13]. OECD average
excludes Japan.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
Creative Commons
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Enquiry Point for referral.