Budget Review 2022–23 Index
Dr Susan Love
The Government will maintain the Humanitarian Program
planning level at 13,750 places in 2022–23 and over the forward estimates,
unchanged from the previous Budget (Budget
measures: budget paper no. 2: 2022–23, p. 117). However, it has
also announced an additional 16,500 places for Afghan nationals across 4 years
from 2022–23 (4,125 per year).
The Government had announced
on 21 January 2022 that
it would commit places for Afghans within the permanent Humanitarian Program
(10,000 places over 4 years from 2021–22) and the Family stream of the
Migration Program (estimated at 5,000 places over those 4 years). The
Department of Home Affairs Afghanistan
update webpage currently states that 5,000 of the Humanitarian places are
due to be filled in the 2021–22 year, leaving another 5,000 places available
across 2022–23 to 2024–25 within the usual Humanitarian Program of 13,750
places in each year (refer also to evidence given at the Senate
Estimates hearing on 14 February 2022, p. 53).
The 16,500 places in the budget measure are in addition to
the 13,750 places in the annual Humanitarian Program. This would give Afghans
1,250 places within the Humanitarian Program until at least 2024–25 as well as
4,125 supplementary places each year until 2025–26 (plus the 5,000 places in
the Family stream to 2024–25). Media
reporting and stakeholder
media releases indicate
a generally positive response to the increase—advocacy groups had been calling
for an additional intake of 20,000 places.
The most recent similar situation where Australia made
additional places available on top of the Humanitarian Program allocation was in
September 2015, when the Government
announced it would resettle an additional 12,000 refugees from Syria and
Iraq. These were permanent Humanitarian places allocated over two program years
(the existing Humanitarian Program was also then at 13,750 places).
measure (p. 117) comes with additional funding of $665.9 million over 4
years from 2022–23 for the resettlement of Afghan nationals. The payments are
across a range of departments, principally the Department of Social Services,
which will see additional funding rising from $36.4 million in 2022–23 to
$202.5 million in 2025–26. The increasing increments are likely in order to
meet the costs of social security and humanitarian support services as more of
the Afghan cohort arrives in the course of each year.
This additional funding builds on $28.8 million in funding
already allocated for the 2021–22 and 2022–23 years from the 2021–22
Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook ‘Settlement and Integration of New
Arrivals from Afghanistan’ measure (p. 260).
Budget paper no. 2 also notes the Government will
provide access to the 3-year Temporary (Humanitarian Concern) visa
(subclass 786) for Ukrainians in 2021–22 and 2022–23 under the ‘assistance
to Ukraine’ measure (p. 70). This commitment was announced
on 20 March 2022. Being a temporary visa, this is not part of the
Humanitarian Program. There does not appear to be any specific funding
allocated under the measure, with the budget paper stating that costs will be
partially met from within existing resources of the Department of Home Affairs,
Holders of Temporary (Humanitarian Concern) visas are
eligible for some humanitarian settlement services, such as Specialised
and Intensive Services and the Adult
Migrant English Program, but not the full
range of services available to permanent humanitarian entrants and only
limited other social security payments.
The overall number of places in the Migration Program also
remains steady at 160,000 for 2022–23 (budget
paper no. 2, p. 12). In both 2020–21 and 2021–22, the Family and
Skill streams of the Migration Program were closely balanced, at 77,300 and 79,600
places respectively, due to the need to account for the effects of the COVID-19
pandemic and related border closures preventing people arriving in Australia (Department
of Home Affairs, The
Administration of the Immigration and Citizenship Programs, (The
Administration), ninth edition, February 2022, p. 23). In 2022–23, the
focus returns to the Skill stream—consistent with the pre‑pandemic
proportions—with 109,900 places allocated, giving the Family stream a total
allocation of 50,000 places, the majority of which are for Partner visas:
40,500 places, as stated in the Minister’s
media release. The remaining 100 places in the Migration Program are
allocated to the Special Eligibility stream.
Partner visas, in particular, were a focus during the period
of closed borders, with 72,300 places allocated in each of 2020–21 and 2021–22 (The
Administration, p. 23). In 2020–21, there were 72,376 Partner visas
granted, compared with 37,118 granted in 2019–20. However, as at 31 December
2021, only 22,937 visas had been granted out of the places for the current 2021–22
year. Budget paper no. 2 (p. 11) states that 10,000 of those 72,300
places will move from the Partner category to the Skill stream for the 2021–22
year, raising the level for that stream to 89,600 places.
Budget paper no. 2 (p. 11) states that this is
due to a ‘sharp fall’ in the number of on-hand applications for Partner visas. The
Administration (p. 31) states that there were about 59,500
applications on-hand as at 31 December 2021, which is still above the estimated
number of 40,500 places to be granted in 2022–23, but is a significant decline
from previous years including the level of 96,361 on‑hand applications in
2019–20 (Department of Home Affairs, Report
on the Migration Program 2020–21, p. 55).
Budget paper no. 2 (p. 12) states that Partner
visas will now be granted on ‘a demand-driven basis’, similarly to the Child
stream. This means that places within the Migration Program are provided as
estimates, but visa grants are not subject to an annual ceiling or cap.
Under section 87 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act), grants of
Partner and Child visas must not be capped, as are other permanent visas in the
Migration Program (sections 85 and 86 of the Act provide that annual limits
(caps) on visas may be specified). The Administration (p. 30) states
that ‘these visas have never been capped. There is, however, scope in
administering the program to consider planning levels and prioritise processing
accordingly’. A higher number of visas could, therefore, be granted if higher
numbers of applications were processed within a year.
Commentators have previously
allocation of planning levels and program places for Partner visas as being a
de facto cap, potentially in conflict with section 87 of the Act. The backlog
in visa processing and
long waiting times (now somewhat reduced) have also been highlighted as contributing to a
failure to meet demand for places. Stakeholders are likely to welcome the
change, but may view the Government’s shift to the ‘demand-driven’ model as
acknowledgement that planning levels were serving as caps.
Within the Skill stream, there are fewer places in 2022–23
for the Business Innovation and Investment and Global Talent visa categories,
both of which had large allocations in the previous two years (13,500 and
15,000 places respectively) with the intention of boosting economic growth (The
Administration, p. 23). As at 31 December 2021, only about one-third
of the Global Talent places for 2021–22 had been filled (The Administration,
p. 23). According to the Home Affairs webpage on Migration
Program planning levels, the equivalent of around 10,000 places from these
two categories will be redistributed in 2022–23 amongst the other categories
(Employer Sponsored, Skilled Independent, Regional, and State/Territory
Nominated; even the Distinguished Talent category, which historically has been
set at 200 places, will be increased to 300 places).
Net overseas migration
The Government has had to continually adjust assumptions on
net overseas migration (NOM) over the last two years due to the effects of the
COVID-19 pandemic and border closures. NOM is the difference between arrivals to
Australia and departures from Australia. Migrant arrivals to Australia are
counted in NOM if they are in Australia for a total of 12 months or more during
a 16-month period. The forecasts in Table 1 below are produced by the Centre
for Population within the Treasury.
Table 1: Net overseas
migration, for years ending 30 June
|Net overseas migration
Source: Australian Government, Federal financial relations: budget paper no. 3:
2020–21, Table A.5 p. 86; Australian Government, Federal financial relations: budget paper no. 3:
2021–22, Table A.5 p. 104; Australian Government, Federal financial relations: budget paper no. 3:
2022–23, Table A.5 p. 114.
NOM is now forecast to be positive in 2021–22 instead of
negative, with a return to pre-pandemic levels still projected for 2024–25.
Population growth is also forecast to be higher than predicted in the 2021–22
Budget: 0.7% in 2021–22, 1.2% in 2022–23 and 1.3% in 2023–24 (Budget
strategy and outlook: budget paper no. 1: 2022–23, p. 37),
compared with only 0.2% in 2021–22 forecast in Budget
strategy and outlook: budget paper no. 1: 2021–22 (p. 37). Further
information is available in the Government’s Population
Statement for December 2021, produced by the Centre for Population.
All online articles accessed April 2022
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to email@example.com.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Enquiry Point for referral.