Dr Matthew Thomas,
Using his influence in the 43rd Parliament, Andrew Wilkie advocated for some significant gambling reforms. Ultimately, a watered down package of measures was introduced by the Gillard Government. These measures were repealed by the Abbott Government and gambling-related reforms were not a key focus of the 44th Parliament. Mr Wilkie has recently indicated that he and Senator Nick Xenophon intend to use their key crossbench positions to ‘put gambling reform back on the national agenda’.
Problem gambling and poker machines
In 2010, the Productivity Commission (PC) released
report after an extensive public inquiry into gambling in Australia. The PC
estimated that of the $19 billion spent on gambling in 2008–09 around $11.9
billion was spent on Electronic Gaming Machines (EGMs), otherwise known as
Problem gambling may be defined
as being ‘characterised by difficulties in limiting money and/or time spent on
gambling which leads to adverse consequences for the gambler, others, or the
community’. While problem gambling occurs across all forms of gambling, the PC estimated
that a greater proportion of EGM players—around 15 per cent of all adults who
play EGMs weekly or more often—were problem gamblers. The PC estimated the cost
of problem gambling to the Australian community to be at least $4.7 billion a
year, with EGMs being responsible for the majority of this cost. The social
costs associated with problem gambling result from adverse impacts on people's
health, jobs, finances, emotional states and relationships.
Given the potential for harm associated with EGMs, the PC recommended,
among other things, a progressive move towards an Australia-wide EGM
pre-commitment system—under which players could set spending limits on all EGMs—by
Gillard Government reforms
In 2010, Independent Member for Denison, Andrew
Wilkie made the introduction of a full mandatory pre-commitment system a key
feature of his agreement to support the minority Gillard Labor Government
following the federal election.
Subsequently, the Parliamentary Joint Select
Committee on Gambling Reform recommended in its 2011
report that a card-based mandatory pre-commitment scheme be introduced by
2014, and that a trial of mandatory pre-commitment be conducted.
In early 2012, then Prime Minister, Julia Gillard announced
the gambling reforms the Government would be proceeding with. The reforms
included a raft of measures to tackle problem gambling, including legislating
for pre-commitment capable EGMs. However, they did not include the
implementation of a mandatory pre-commitment system and, as a consequence, Mr
his support for the government. In changing its stance the Gillard
Government was likely to have been influenced
by an intense campaign against mandatory pre-commitment conducted primarily by the
club and hotel industries.
In November 2012, the Gillard Government introduced
Gambling Reform Bill 2012 and two companion bills. The provisions of these bills
- from the end of 2013, all new EGMs would be capable of supporting an
approved pre-commitment system
- by 2016, EGMs would be linked together as part of a state-wide or
territory-wide pre-commitment system, and display electronic warning messages,
- from 1 May 2013 Automatic Teller Machines (ATMs) located in gaming
venues would have a $250 daily withdrawal limit.
The bills also proposed the establishment of a
national regulator to monitor compliance with the new scheme and the main features
of, and methodology for, a 12 month trial of mandatory pre-commitment. The trial
was to be undertaken by ClubsACT before being postponed in the lead-up to the
2013 federal election.
Following its election to office, the Abbott
Coalition Government introduced the Social
Services and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2013, which effectively wound
back all of the above reforms in favour of the development and implementation
of a voluntary pre-commitment scheme and a focus on responsible gambling and industry
self-regulation. The bill was passed by both houses of Parliament on 25 March
Online gambling—an emerging area of concern
In its 2010 report, the PC observed that online
gaming and sports betting were growing rapidly in Australia. This
trend has continued, with sports betting, in
particular, gaining in popularity among young men. It has been estimated
that online betting is growing at 15 per cent per annum.
A number of factors are likely to have contributed
to the strong uptake of online sports betting in Australia. These include the centrality
of sport and general acceptance of gambling in Australian culture, Australia’s
high rate of internet and smartphone usage and intensive advertising and
promotion by sports betting companies. There is some
concern that sports betting advertising during live sports broadcasts may
be normalising gambling among young viewers, and potentially creating a new generation
of problem gamblers.
One of the problems associated with online sports
betting is its potential to increase corruption
in sport. Gambling online easily enables wagers to be made on particular
incidents taking place in a sporting competition, and not just on the
competition’s outcome. ‘Exotic’ or ‘spot bets’ have already been implicated in
the corruption of international cricket. While the provision and advertising of
‘in play’ betting to customers in Australia is prohibited under the Interactive
Gambling Act 2001, the existing approach to regulation has been
found to be inconsistent and difficult to enforce, with in play betting
readily available through offshore providers. It is worth noting that,
irrespective of the regulatory approach adopted, it would be almost impossible
to regulate access to or prevent the use of international gaming sites.
Another key concern is the capacity for online
gambling to contribute to gambling problems among vulnerable individuals. The
use of communications technology enables gamblers to gamble from anywhere, at
any time, in privacy, and without appearing to spend ‘real’ money. These
characteristics, when combined with sports betting companies’ aggressive
marketing and inducements to gamble, have contributed
to rates of problem gambling among online gamblers being more than double the
rate for all gamblers.
The Government is aware of the problems associated
with online gambling and the limitations of Australia’s current regulatory
regime. In 2015, then Minister for Social Services, Scott Morrison commissioned
of the impact of illegal offshore wagering. In its response
to the review, the Government committed to, among other things, the development
of a national policy framework that would improve the regulation of online
gambling and the effectiveness of consumer protection and harm minimisation
Where to next?
Andrew Wilkie and Nick Xenophon have indicated
that they intend to pursue a number of specific gambling reforms, namely, the
imposition of maximum $1 bets and $120 in maximum hourly losses on EGMs, and the
banning of sports betting advertising during G-rated television broadcasts.
They also hope to revive the Parliamentary Joint Select Committee on Gambling
Reform in order to push for further reform in relation to online gambling and
Although a significant number of Australians
experience gambling-related problems, the PC estimated that only around 15 per
cent of them seek help. Further, it found the evidence for the effectiveness of
many of the available help services is limited.
This suggests that if problem gambling and its associated
harms are to be seriously tackled then there may need to be a greater focus on
preventive measures. Such measures include changing aspects of the environment
that lead to problems for gamblers vulnerable to harm, such as gambling technology,
the accessibility of gambling and the nature and conduct of gambling providers.
Productivity Commission, Gambling, Report, 50, Commonwealth of Australia, 2010.
A Biggs and P Pyburne, National Gambling Reform Bill 2012, Bills digest, 51, 2012–13, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2012.
B O’Farrell, Review of illegal offshore wagering
, Commonwealth of Australia (Department of Social Services), 2015.
Back to Parliamentary Library Briefing Book
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.