Queensland Election 2001
Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Group
Gerard Newman, Statistics Group
3 April 2001
Contents
Major Issues
Introduction
The Beattie Government-living on a knife
edge
Queensland goes to the polls
The major party contest
Labor
The Coalition
Minor parties
The result
The major party vote
Labor
National
Liberal
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
The City Country Alliance
Greens versus Australian Democrats
Independents
Voting methods factors
Preference flows
'Just Vote 1'
Three-cornered contests
The verdict
Government stability
Ineffectiveness of the Opposition
Coalition disunity
Federal factors
A postscript to the Queensland election-the
by-election in Ryan
Endnotes
Appendix 1: Voter support 1998-2001
Appendix 2: One Nation MLAs elected 1998
Appendix 3: Results
Table 1 Legislative Assembly: State
Summary
Table 2a Legislative Assembly: First Preference
Votes, District Summary - Number
Table 2b Legislative Assembly: First Preference
Votes, District Summary - Per cent
Table 3 Legislative Assembly: District
Detail
Table 4 Legislative Assembly: Two Candidate
Preferred Vote
Table 5 Legislative Assembly: Electoral
Pendulum
Table 6 Legislative Assembly By-elections
1998-2000
Table 7 Legislative Assembly Elections
1950-2001
Major Issues
Premier Beattie's first Queensland Government lived on a knife
edge after narrowly winning office in 1998. It had won 44 of the 89
Assembly seats, with a first preference vote of only 38.9 per cent.
The Government's position was eased slightly when it gained an
additional seat in a December 1998 by-election. Because of the
'electoral rorts' affair, Beattie came under pressure to call an
election early in 2001. Although he could have waited until
September 2001, Beattie set the Queensland election date for 24
February 2001: 'It may not be in my best interests for there to be
an early election but it is in the best interests of
Queenslanders'. The election was conducted using electoral
boundaries drawn up during 1998 and 1999.
Labor's biggest asset appeared to be Peter Beattie. Beattie had
long enjoyed a high opinion poll rating among the six Premiers, and
it showed no sign of waning prior to the election.
Neither the Nationals, led by former Premier Rob Borbidge, nor
the Liberals, led by David Watson, had been able to make any
long-term inroad into Labor's support. This position did not seem
to alter during the election. Between 1998 and 2001, Borbidge's
approval rating remained significantly below that of the
Premier.
The Coalition parties were not free from tensions. The Nationals
were split over the issue of dealing with One Nation for their
preferences, and some appeared to be angling for Borbidge's
position. Meanwhile, a number of Liberals were publicly less than
impressed with the performance of their leader, David Watson.
A key factor seemed to be the re-emergence of One Nation as a
genuine electoral force in the Western Australian election held a
week earlier, where the party gained a Legislative Assembly vote of
9.6 per cent, together with three upper house seats. One Nation
appeared likely to do at least as well in Queensland. Although it
had only 39 nominations, this was enough for the major parties to
be concerned about their possible impact on particular electorate
results.
Labor's campaign was dominated by the Premier, with the general
instruction to voters of 'Just vote 1'. His opponents were
disunited and appeared to have trouble in making themselves heard,
and, in fact, on a number of occasions Borbidge seemed to be
conceding victory to Labor.
The result of the election was never in doubt on election
night-the ABC commentary team had given the result to Labor within
minutes of the start of the television coverage of the counting.
Labor won 66 of the 89 seats, the Coalition won 15 (Nationals 12,
Liberals 3), One Nation won 3 and 5 independents were successful,
two of whom were MLAs who had won their seats under the One Nation
banner in 1998.
Among the interesting figures:
- Labor's 66 seats represented 74.2 per cent of the Legislative
Assembly, equalling the party's best-ever result in 1935
- the National Party vote was its lowest on record. Its 12 seats
equalled its lowest total gained in 1944, and the earlier figure
was in an Assembly of 62
- the Liberal Party's vote was its lowest since the party first
contested Queensland elections in 1950. Its three seats represent
the lowest number it has ever won in the Assembly
- the combined major party (ALP/LIB/NP) vote of 77.4 per cent was
the second lowest on record in a Queensland election
- the Greens and Australian Democrats improved their
electorate-level vote, but in the electorates they both contested,
no Democrat finished ahead of a Green rival
- in 25 of 89 electorates (28.1 per cent) one of the final two
candidates in the count did not come from a major party. For this
reason the term 'two-party-preferred' is not used in this paper,
and the term 'two-candidate-preferred' is used in its place
- in fifteen electorates, the One Nation candidate was one of the
final two left in the count when the two-candidate-preferred vote
was ascertained, and
- in the electorate of Nicklin the final two candidates in the
two-candidate-preferred count were an independent and a One Nation
candidate-no major party candidate remained at that stage. As far
as can be ascertained, this is the only instance of this occurring
since preferential elections have been given full counts in each
electorate.
Among the relevant factors explaining the result, the strength
and unity of Labor's leadership, the lacklustre Coalition effort in
Opposition, the disunity in Coalition ranks and the intrusion of
federal factors are highlighted.
The paper concludes with a brief summary of the subsequent
Commonwealth by-election in Ryan.
Introduction
The 2001 Western Australian and Queensland elections produced
two remarkable results that helped turn a time of apparent
electoral calm into one of electoral volatility. In the West, the
Court Coalition Government failed in its bid for a third term.
Labor gained its largest haul of seats since the election of 1911,
winning office in a fashion that few commentators had believed
likely. (1) One week later, Queensland voters increased
Labor's Legislative Assembly numbers to a level that equalled the
party's best-ever result in that State, achieved in 1935. It was
also remarkable that many voters maintained the clear decline in
support for major parties in Australian elections that is
increasingly being commented upon by many observers. These two
elections, together with the by-election for the Commonwealth
electorate of Ryan, have left parties and observers wondering what
this might presage for the forthcoming Commonwealth election.
The Beattie Government-living on a knife
edge
In June 1998 the Beattie Government had won office as a minority
government only after securing the support of the independent MLA
for Nicklin, Peter Wellington. The Independent MLA for Gladstone,
Liz Cunningham, gave Labor support on their budget and confidence
issues. Premier Beattie's first Government lived on a knife edge.
It had won only 44 of the 89 Assembly seats, with its first
preference vote of 38.9 per cent being over 11 per cent lower than
the party had secured under the leadership of Wayne Goss in 1989.
The Government's position was eased slightly in December 1998, when
a by-election for the seat of Mulgrave held by Pauline Hanson's One
Nation (hereafter referred to as 'One Nation'), was won for the
Government by Warren Pitt. Premier Beattie now had just over half
of the Legislative Assembly seats.
The parliamentary advantage thus gained was overshadowed by the
various crises that battered the Government, including:
- ongoing battles with the Australian Workers' Union over various
union and Labor Party issues
- controversy over Lang Park football stadium being chosen as the
venue for a new 60 000 seat sports stadium
- the Netbet affair where the Government awarded an online
gambling licence to a company linked to ALP figures, including
former deputy leader, Bill D'Arcy.
- the resignation, trial and gaoling of Bill D'Arcy for child sex
offences. This included public criticism of the size of D'Arcy's
superannuation payout, and
- the decision of accident-prone Treasurer, David Hamill, not to
recontest his seat at the next election.
The Premier's major problem, however, seemed to be the emergence
of the 'electoral rorts' affair. This became national news with the
gaoling in August 2000 of Karen Ehrmann, a former State Labor
candidate, for electoral fraud. (2) In the aftermath of
this, a Queensland Criminal Justice Commission inquiry was
established to investigate Labor Party electoral practices from
1993 to 1997, while the Commonwealth Parliament's Joint Standing
Committee on Electoral Matters also began an inquiry.
As information emerged concerning doubtful practices that
appeared to be long entrenched in the Labor Party, Premier Beattie
moved to cauterise the problem. Changes were announced to the way
in which Labor would henceforth hold party pre-selections, and over
thirty party workers were forced to leave the party, pushed by
Beattie's chosen 'hard-headed son-of-a-bitch', Terry Mackenroth.
(3) Of greater possible significance electorally, were
the forced resignations of three MLAs, including Deputy Premier,
Jim Elder (Capalaba), Grant Musgrove (Springwood) and former State
Secretary, Mike Kaiser (Woodridge). Beattie made a strong effort to
suggest that rorting was not widespread, and that swift action
would eradicate the problem from the party:
I think the electorate can distinguish between a competent
executive government and a few bad eggs within a political party
that has thousands of members.
The success of this tactic was felt to be uncertain, but the
Bulletin , at least, was impressed, describing the
Premier's handling of the affair as 'masterful' and the weeding-out
of members as 'brutal'. (4)
Despite the effort to lessen the impact of this issue, the
Premier seemed increasingly under threat. Wellington's withdrawal
of support for the Government, and the Premier's closing down of
Parliament, seemed symptomatic of a government whose days were
numbered. The Leader of the Opposition, Rob Borbidge, accused the
Premier of avoiding facing the public and called for an election to
'clear the air'. Eventually Borbidge got his way.
Queensland goes to the polls
Although he could have waited until as late as September 2001,
Beattie set the Queensland election date for 17 February 2001.
Interestingly, by the time that the date was settled, the opinion
poll standing of the Premier and his party was higher than might
have been expected if the electoral rorts affair was to be a factor
in the election outcome. The Premier's reneging on an earlier
promise of going full term seemed not likely to hurt his chances,
though he suggested the early election was not necessarily the best
outcome for his party: 'It may not be in my best interests for
there to be an early election but it is in the best interests of
Queenslanders'. (5)
The 2001 Queensland election was conducted using electoral
boundaries drawn up as a consequence of a redistribution in 1998
and 1999. About three-quarters of all electorates had their
boundaries altered: (6)
- the number of seats remained at 89 (the 2001 election was the
sixth since this number was established prior to the 1986
election)
- two Brisbane seats (Chermside and Kedron) held by the ALP, were
merged to form Stafford
- two western seats (Western Downs and Crows Nest) held by the
National Party, were merged to form Darling Downs
- Gaven was created on the Gold Coast, and Glass House created on
the Sunshine Coast
- nine other electorate names were new: Algester (based on
Archerfield), Kawana (Mooloolah), Mudgeeraba (Nerang), Nanango
(Barambah), Pumicestone (Caboolture), Robina (Merrimac), Southern
Downs (Warwick), Stretton (Sunnybank) and Yeerongpilly
(Yeronga).
Among long-standing Members of the Parliament who were not
re-contesting were Tony Elliott (Cunningham, NP, MLA since 1977),
Len Stephan (Gympie, NP, 1979), Brian Littleproud (Western Downs,
NP, 1983), and David Hamill (Ipswich, ALP, 1983, former Treasurer
under Beattie). Russell Cooper, former Premier (September-December
1989) (NP, Crows Nest, 1983) was also departing. Since the 1998
election, former Labor Ministers, Bob Gibbs (Bundamba, 1977) and
Bill D'Arcy (Woodridge, 1977) had also left the Parliament, the
former to take up a government position in Los Angeles, the latter
to face a court case and 14 years in gaol.
The major party contest
Labor
As has become the norm in modern State elections, the Premier
dominated the Labor campaign to such an extent that it was
difficult to tell who else was in the Government team. Premiers
such as Wran (NSW), Bjelke-Petersen (Qld) and Kennett (Vic) have
all done so, and Beattie was acknowledging both the way the media
covers modern elections, as well as his apparent 'clean-skin'
standing in regard to the 'electoral rorts' controversy. The
Beattie website (Beattie2001.com) with its linking of only the
Premier's name with the election, was a reminder of the
Kennett-dominated site (jeff.com) during the 1999 Victorian State
election. (7) In such a climate, there was little focus
upon policies, even though the parties kept making announcements
throughout the campaign. Professor John Wanna has noted that as the
parties said very similar things about policy, the effect was 'to
neutralise policy as a campaign issue'. (8) Beattie did
spend a lot of time criticising the Commonwealth Government for its
policies that, he claimed, were hurting his State. This also is
part and parcel of State elections, for Premiers often believe an
anti-Commonwealth stance does them no harm in the ballot box.
Since 1992, Queensland elections have used optional preferential
voting (OPV). To cast a valid vote, only a first preference vote
need be marked, though the voter may mark more than a single
preference. The Labor Party decided that its how-to-vote
instructions to voters would be simple: 'Just vote 1'. In other
words, Labor voters should give the party their first preference,
and no preferences should be given to any other candidate. In
seeking to take advantage of OPV in this way, Labor sought to
minimise the impact of the exchange of preferences that might
favour Coalition candidates. It also hoped that many One Nation
voters would stop after casting a first preference. The Coalition
parties tried to make an issue of Labor's tactic, but it seemed to
be no more controversial with voters than when the Wran Labor
Government followed the same tactic in the New South Wales election
of 1981.
The
Coalition
The Opposition was not united in its efforts. The parties issued
various policies, but seemed distracted by internal problems:
- the issue of whether or not to put One Nation ahead of Labor on
how-to-vote cards divided the Nationals. Despite the existence of
much support for putting Labor last, early in the campaign Rob
Borbidge claimed that no Nationals would put One Nation ahead of
Labor. His position in the party was weakened, however, by his
being forced to accept that many National candidates would ignore
his words. As David Moore, the party's candidate in Mundingburra,
put it, directing preferences to the ALP ahead of One Nation might
work in Brisbane, but 'makes no sense in the north'. Despite at
least 19 of the party's 50 candidates eventually favouring One
Nation, State Director, Ken Crooke, denied that party members were
at odds with their leader, but Borbidge himself saw this as a
setback. (9)
- Borbidge probably earned no friends within the Coalition for
his acknowledgment on several occasions that the Labor Party would
probably win the election. In talking of the Premier, he was even
prepared to acknowledge: 'you have got to concede his [i.e.
Beattie's] popularity'. (10)
- these matters were presumably among the reasons for the
emergence during the campaign of media stories suggesting that
various Nationals were angling for Borbidge's position as party
leader. (11)
- the One Nation preferences issue also caused tensions between
many Nationals and the Liberal Party. The Liberals had been hurt by
their dalliance with One Nation in the 1998 Queensland election,
and the party's leader, David Watson, was determined that the same
would not occur on this occasion: 'we believe the cancer of
extremism has to be resisted' (12)
- the Liberal leadership was criticised for its less-than-dynamic
campaigning and was said to be in some danger of becoming 'an
ineffectual sideshow to public life in Queensland'
(13)
- by early 2000 the three-cornered contest, that running sore of
Coalition relations, had re-appeared, with each party expressing
its opposition to the other's intentions (14)
- if these problems were not enough to seriously weaken the
Coalition, the leaders at times sounded desperate in their attacks
on the Labor Party. In one example that was redolent of the
Bjelke-Petersen period, Borbidge promised that a Coalition
government would 'go back to basics on core issues and core
values'. To make his point, he claimed that Queensland schools
needed to teach about the career of Winston Churchill rather than
that of Ho Chi Minh. Borbidge also followed the federal Coalition's
line that a vote for One Nation was a vote for Labor, a claim that
may have been too subtle for voters, who were also hearing National
politicians calling for an exchange of preferences with One Nation.
Watson picked up the same theme, asserting that the no preference
policy was Labor 'climbing into bed' with a 'racist rabble'.
(15)
On balance, if there was support to be won or lost because of
party campaigns, the advantages seemed to lie with the Labor
Party.
Minor parties
As is usual, the focus of the media was largely upon the three
major parties. In such a setting, it was therefore difficult for
the minor parties, including the Greens and Australian Democrats,
to gain a hearing. Only in the final week of the campaign did
Pauline Hanson, fresh from One Nation's upper house success in
Western Australia, manage to break through the domination of the
media enjoyed by Labor, National and Liberal Parties. After the
election, the leader of the City Country Alliance (CCA), Bill
Feldman, acknowledged the difficulties that are usually experienced
by the minor players in an election:
We were steamrolled by the Beattie smile at the start of the
campaign and by Pauline Hanson's legs at the end of it. The media
ignored us the whole way through the campaign and it's hard to get
support when you can't get your message out. (16)
Despite the late entry of One Nation into the contest, its
Western Australian performance persuaded some commentators that One
Nation voters, past and present, would be crucial to the election
outcome. (17)
The result
The result of the 2001 Queensland election was never in doubt on
election night-the ABC's Antony Green had given the result to Labor
within minutes of the start of the television coverage of the
counting. Labor won comfortably (for full figures, see Appendix
3).
Party
|
Formal vote
|
%
|
Seats won
|
Seats contested
|
Australian Labor Party
|
1 007 231
|
48.9(+10.0)
|
66(+22)
|
89
|
Liberal Party
|
294 922
|
14.3(-1.8)
|
3(-6)
|
45
|
National Party
|
291 330
|
14.2(-1.0)
|
12(-11)
|
50
|
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
|
178 950
|
8.7(-14.0)
|
3(-8)
|
39
|
The Greens
|
51 623
|
2.5(+0.1)
|
-
|
31
|
City Country Alliance
|
49 258
|
2.4(+2.4)
|
-
|
25
|
Australian Democrats
|
7 027
|
0.3(-1.3)
|
-
|
6
|
Other candidates
|
178 169
|
8.6(+5.3)
|
5(+3)
|
-
|
Total formal votes
|
2 058 510
|
|
|
|
Informal votes
|
47 840
|
2.3
|
|
|
Total enrolment
|
2 276 044
|
|
|
|
Source: Electoral Commission of Queensland
For the first time a substantial number of women was elected to
the Legislative Assembly. From having the second lowest Assembly
percentage of women in any State Parliament (18.3 per cent),
Queensland now has the highest: 37.1 per cent. In the Queensland
ALP Caucus 40.9 per cent are women.
The major
party vote
In the last two Queensland elections (1998 and 2001) the
combined major party (ALP/LIB/NP) vote has averaged 73.8 per cent.
By contrast, the eight elections between 1974 and 1995 averaged
95.2 per cent. Thus continues the decline in the major party vote
that has been noted elsewhere. (18) In 25 of 89
electorates (28.1 per cent), one of the final two candidates in the
count did not come from a major party. For this reason, the term
'two-party-preferred' is not used in this paper, with the term
'two-candidate-preferred' being used in its place. Perhaps the most
startling detail of all, however, came in the electorate of
Nicklin. In this contest, the final two candidates in the
two-candidate-preferred count were an independent and a One Nation
candidate-no major party candidate remained. This is possibly the
only instance of this occurring in a Commonwealth, State or
Territory election in the past 50 years.
Labor
Labor's primary vote of 48.9 per cent was 10 percentage points
higher than its 1998 return. The 18 Labor victories since the
election of 1912 have produced an average vote of 48.8 per cent.
The Government's 66 seats represent 74.2 per cent of the
Legislative Assembly, equalling the party's best-ever result,
achieved in a house of 62 after the election of 1935. Labor
contested all 89 electorates. According to the ABC's Antony Green,
Labor's vote rose over 11 per cent in South East of the State, with
eight of nine Gold Coast electorates garnered. Its vote climbed 9.5
per cent in regional cities and over six per cent in rural areas.
The party won unlikely victories in electorates such as
Indooroopilly in Brisbane and Burdekin in the North.
(19)
A possible measure of the electoral rorts issue was Labor's vote
in the three electorates where the sitting members had felt it
necessary to resign after the Shepherdson Inquiry had begun its
work. In Springwood, Labor's 1998 vote of 38.2 per cent jumped to
45.6 per cent. In Woodridge, Labor's 1998 vote of 51.7 per cent had
risen in the 2000 by-election to 56.5 per cent, and it climbed
further in 2001 to 57.3 per cent. Only in Capalaba, was Labor's
1998 vote (54.9%) not sustained. Analysis of the returns, however,
suggest that Labor's 43.6 per cent in that electorate was due
largely to the campaigns of two strong independents, whose combined
vote totalled more than 29 per cent. In two Townsville electorates,
where the rorts affair come to prominence, the Labor vote rose by
7.4 per cent in Townsville, and 4.2 per cent in Mundingburra
.
National
The National Party won 14.2 per cent of the Queensland vote,
though it contested only 45 electorates. In the previous
election it contested one fewer electorate and won one per cent
more of the first preference vote. The 14.2 per cent is the party's
lowest State-wide vote on record. Its 12 seats equalled its lowest
total gained in 1944, and the earlier figure was in an Assembly of
62. It now holds just 13.5 per cent of the Assembly seats. The fact
that the party finished behind a One Nation candidate on first
preferences in 11 electorates is another measure of the decline in
the fortunes of a party that dominated non-Labor politics for so
long. Among Nationals to be defeated were Allan Grice (Broadwater),
Rob Mitchell (Charters Towers) and Doug Slack (Burnett).
Liberal
The Liberal Party's effort of 14.3 per cent was 1.8 per cent
lower than in 1998-when it also contested three fewer electorates.
In fact, the vote was the party's lowest since it first contested
Queensland elections in 1950. Its previous lowest return had been
14.9 percent in 1983. Its three seats represent its lowest number
in the Assembly (it had won 9 in each of 1989, 1992 and 1998), and
opened the question of whether it ought to receive the type of
resource allocation in Parliament normally granted the largest
parties. The Liberals lost Santo Santoro (Clayfield), John Goss
(Aspley) and Denver Beanland (Indooroopilly), and for some days it
was thought that its leader, David Watson, and former leader, Joan
Sheldon, had been defeated. Each eventually managed to retain their
seat.
Pauline
Hanson's One Nation
For a long time, the severe implosion in the One Nation Party
had suggested that it would have difficulty in restoring the
electoral credibility that it had earned in 1998. The figures in
Appendix 1 indicate that for much of the period 1999-2000 many
voters were unprepared to express their support for the party.
Before the end of the first year of the Parliament, six of the
eleven MLAs had left the party, and the other five resigned in late
1999. Some of these chose to sit as members of the newly-formed
City Country Alliance, some declared their independence from
parties, and one left the Parliament. The members cited the absence
of democratic and accountable structures within the party as the
main reason for their defection, though Wanna has also pointed to
clashes of personality and claims of dishonesty within the party
(for a summary of the fate of the eleven One Nation MLAs elected in
1998, see Appendix 2). (20) In addition to these
defections, the party was found to have been fraudulently
registered at the time of the 1998 election. After a struggle to
raise funds, more than $500 000 of public funding given to One
Nation by the Electoral Commission of Queensland was repaid.
A key factor in the re-emergence of One Nation as a genuine
electoral force seems to have been the Western Australian election
held a week earlier. The party contested this State on the back of
its 10.4 per cent vote in the 1998 Senate election. Spurred on by a
flurry of publicity for Pauline Hanson when she campaigned around
that State, the party's Legislative Assembly vote was 9.6 per cent.
In the Legislative Council, the party did even better, gaining 9.9
per cent and three upper house seats, two more than was managed by
the National Party (2.9 per cent of the vote).
In Queensland, the party had been deregistered for some time.
Its late re-registration, shortly before the deadline for the
nomination of candidates, meant that only 39 nominations were
lodged, but it was a large enough number for the major parties to
be concerned about their possible impact on particular electorate
results. It certainly produced much discussion about deals for the
party's preferences. Hanson stated that the party would direct
preferences on a seat-by-seat basis, though it was also likely to
direct preferences against sitting members, as it had done in
Western Australia.
With only 39 candidates, 40 fewer than in 1998, it was
unrealistic to imagine that One Nation's remarkable 22.7 per cent
of the State-wide vote would be repeated. However, despite the
small number of candidates, and the party' late entry into the
campaign, it managed to average 20.3 per cent of first preferences
in those 39 electorates, and secured the election of three
candidates in Gympie, Lockyer and Tablelands. One indication of the
breadth of support for One Nation can be seen in the fact that in
fifteen electorates, the One Nation candidate was one of the final
two left in the count when the two-candidate-preferred figure was
established.
Overall, though, its vote per seat did decline. In 1998, its
first preference vote averaged 25.4 per cent in the seats it
contested, and it topped 40 per cent in three seats (Barambah,
Maryborough, Tablelands). In 2001, however, it could manage just
three electorates with a vote in excess of 30 per cent.
(21) Newman has drawn attention to the fact that One
Nation's 1998 vote was higher outside of Brisbane than in the
capital, and this was also the case in 2001. (22)
One Nation first preferences were higher than Labor first
preferences in five electorates, were higher than Liberal first
preferences in seven electorates, and higher than National Party
first preferences in eleven electorates. With the National and
Liberal votes falling in 2001, presumably Labor was the major
beneficiary of the fourteen per cent drop in the One Nation
State-wide figure.
The City
Country Alliance
Five of the former One Nation party MPs contested the election
as members of the CCA, along with 20 other candidates. Bill Feldman
offered to campaign 'alongside' One Nation candidates who had
similar goals to CCA, but Hanson rejected the offer.
(23) None of the CCA candidates was successful,
including its five sitting members. Although the CCA averaged only
8.5 per cent in the electorates it contested, Jeff Knuth managed
20.9 per cent in Burdekin, David Dalgleish 18.5 per cent in Hervey
Bay and Feldman 15.5 per cent in Pumicestone. Six other candidates
received at least 10 per cent of first preferences.
How much combined support was there for One Nation and the CCA?
Because they did not contest all electorates, this is impossible to
answer, but even with this limitation, we can at least point to
their aggregate vote being 11.1 per cent State-wide. Some
electorates revealed a great deal of support: in the 11 electorates
contested by both, the average first preference vote was 31.9 per
cent. In Lockyer (46.3 per cent) and in Burdekin (40.6 per cent)
the One Nation/CCA vote topped 40 per cent. Even in Ipswich (22.2
per cent) and Cunningham (22.9 per cent) over one-fifth of voters
cast ballots for one or the other.
Greens
versus Australian Democrats
One contest which some people claimed had national overtones,
was that between the Greens and the Australian Democrats, despite
the fact that both had been almost invisible during the campaign.
The Greens ran 31 candidates, a drop of 15 on the 1998 figure,
while Democrat candidates almost disappeared, with just six
candidates compared with 42 in the previous election.
Both parties improved their electorate-level vote, but overall
the Greens overshadowed the Australian Democrats. The Green average
first preference vote was seven per cent (4.4 per cent in 1998),
while the Democrats averaged 4.8 per cent (3.4 per cent in 1998).
In the Brisbane electorates of Mount Coot-tha (11.9 per cent) and
Indooroopilly (10.1 per cent) the Green vote topped 10 per cent. In
the six electorates contested by both, the Greens comfortably won
the head-to-head contest, leading the Australian Democrats in all,
with 8.3 per cent to 4.8 per cent of first preferences.
These two parties were very much on the fringe of the election
action, and their votes were tiny by comparison with those already
discussed, but it has not stopped partisans from drawing federal
implications from them. Just how much basis the claims may have is
a matter of interpretation. Senator Bob Brown (Tas, TG), for
instance, spoke of the Green vote being a good springboard for the
Greens winning a Senate seat in Queensland. (24)
Assuming that this State result is relevant to the forthcoming
Commonwealth contest, it can be noted that in 1993 Dee Margetts won
a Western Australian Senate position with a Green first preference
vote of 5.5 per cent, while Brown himself entered the Senate on a
Tasmanian Green vote of 8.7 per cent. A 2001 figure in this range
might leave the party in a tight fight with the Australian
Democrats and One Nation for the final Senate seat later in the
year.
For their part the Australian Democrats talked down the Green
claim. National Campaign Director, Jim Downey, noted that the
party's State election results were invariably higher than in
Commonwealth elections, while Meg Lees noted that the Australian
Democrats had never had 'much of a profile in Queensland state
politics'. (25) The Democrats won seats in each of the
last two Queensland Senate contests with first preference votes of
13.2 per cent (1996) and 7.8 per cent (1998).
Independents
Six MLAs stood as independents. Apart from Liz Cunningham
(Gladstone) and Peter Wellington (Nicklin), former One Nation
parliamentarians, John Kingston (Maryborough), Dorothy (Dolly)
Pratt (Barambah, now Nanango), Shaun Nelson (Tablelands) and Ken
Turner (Thuringowa) had left their party and had sat as
independents (see Appendix 2). There were also a number of
prominent local independent candidates, including Toni Bowler,
Murray Elliott (both Capalaba), Sno Bonneau (Barron River) and Ray
Hopper (Darling Downs).
In the event, Cunningham, Wellington, Kingston and Pratt (the
latter supported by Joh Bjelke-Petersen) were all re-elected.
Only Kingston (33.5 per cent) had a struggle, with the other three
all well ahead on first preferences. Cunningham won her third
election, this time with an absolute majority, her vote having
risen on the two occasions she has re-contested the electorate.
These four were joined by local dairy farmer, Ray Hopper, in
Darling Downs, an electorate that the National Party had expected
to win.
Voting methods factors
Preference
flows
In Western Australia, One Nation's policy of targeting sitting
members hurt the Liberal Party more than Labor, though not by a
large margin. Newman's figures suggest that Labor may have done
marginally better (51.8 per cent) than the Coalition (48.2 per
cent) from One Nation preferences. (26) This suggests
that One Nation might not be able to control its preferences as
tightly as the more experienced parties. The Electoral Commission
of Queensland is now not releasing full count figures until at
least June 2001, so this paper is unable to make any assessment of
either One Nation or Green preference flows.
'Just Vote
1'
For a similar reason, it is not possible at this stage to make
any statistical analysis of the Labor Party's 'Just vote 1' tactic,
though John Wanna has called it 'the most impressive and masterful
tactic of the campaign', and 'a major turning point'!
(27)
Three-cornered contests
Three-cornered contests produce a lot of heat in Coalition
relations, particularly when the Liberal Party is seen to be
intruding in an electorate that the National Party regards as one
of its natural constituencies. The claim that such contests
essentially do more harm than good is hard to sustain, for it is
possible to find many electorates where the tactic has probably
increased the total vote for the Coalition parties-which is the
original reason for the emergence of this tactic many years ago.
Worthington has noted, for example, that in the 1996 Western
Australian election, the tactic certainly aided the parties, and
helped the Liberals win the seat of Ningaloo from the ALP.
(28) At the same time, one reason why Labor introduced
OPV in Queensland was to lessen the impact of three-cornered
contests. Coalition opponents therefore argue that three-cornered
contests are pointless if OPV is the voting method. It is also said
that they can cause more trouble than they are worth, on the
grounds that they are often interpreted in the media as an
indication of Coalition tensions.
During 2000 the Liberal and National Parties had argued over
this issue, especially in relation to the electorates of Albert,
Cunningham and Springwood, with neither prepared to back down. In
the event, three-cornered contests occurred in six electorates,
including these three. Because the two parties performed so weakly
across the State, however, it is not possible to argue that the
tactic had any deleterious impact on the overall Coalition effort.
In Cunningham, the one electorate where the Coalition had a
realistic chance of winning, the Nationals actually took the
electorate, so that the three-cornered tactic certainly did not
prevent this victory. (29)
Three-cornered contests
Electorate
|
Liberal vote
|
National vote
|
Combined vote
|
Winning candidate
(1 st preferences)
|
Albert
|
13.6
|
12.0
|
25.6
|
ALP 50.7
|
Cunningham
|
14.8
|
24.9
|
39.7
|
Coalition (NP)
|
Glass House
|
10.7
|
18.0
|
28.7
|
ALP 40.8
|
Nicklin
|
9.2
|
7.8
|
17.0
|
Ind 46.3
|
Springwood
|
14.6
|
18.8
|
33.4
|
ALP 45.6
|
Thuringowa
|
10.1
|
18.7
|
28.8
|
ALP 41.0
|
Source: Electoral Commission of
Queensland.
The
verdict
Government
stability
Within six months of narrowly winning office in 1998, the
Premier had the satisfaction of seeing his Government's support
climb approximately ten percentage points in opinion polling
conducted by Newspoll. Apart from a brief period in late 2000 when
the party seemed to lose support, though not its lead over the
Coalition parties, Labor maintained remarkably even support across
the State (see Appendix 1). To a large extent, the 2001 Labor
victory may have been won by early 1999. Certainly Newspoll's Sol
Lebovic believed that the electorate had made up its mind well
before polling day. (30) In summary, it was Labor's very
healthy and continuing support that was probably the key factor to
explaining the electoral outcome.
This was probably aided by the electorate's perception of
Premier Beattie, who appeared to be Labor's biggest asset. Before
the announcement of the premature election, the Premier had
attempted to suggest that there had been a sea-change in the party.
Beattie did his best to convince voters that the 'rorters' had been
expelled, and that electoral rorting was a thing of the past. In
January he travelled to Barcaldine to stand under the Tree of
Knowledge, a place of importance to Labor's Queensland history,
where he announced a series of reforms to Labor's internal
processes that he labelled 'a rebirth, a renewal, a fresh start for
the Labor Party'. (31) Beattie also embarked on a two
week 'listening tour', where he claimed to have met 'real people'.
He explained that this was the only way he could break a commitment
to Peter Wellington that he would not go to an election before May
2001. (32) Despite the Australian labelling
such a claim as 'rubbish', suggesting that it was more to do with
seeking to protect his team from the dangers associated with the
recall of Parliament, it seemed not to hurt his party's chances. It
may well have been seen as the Premier trying to do the correct
thing by his party and the public. (33)
Labor's electoral position seems therefore to have been given
strength by a perception of Beattie as likely to give stability and
safety for Queensland, unlike the divided Coalition (see below).
The Courier-Mail could see weaknesses in the Government's
performance, but the newspaper may well have summed up the
prevailing mood in its last words on the Premier:
For all his Government's faults, he combines an inclusive
leadership style with generally sound economic policies that ought
to see the state right over the next three years.
The Courier-Mail believed, therefore, that Labor had
earned voter support. (34) The Townsville
Bulletin expressed a similar view, though it noted that this
was as much by default as through any clear strengths that Labor
possessed. (35) Quite remarkably, Beattie even entered
the election with the ninety-year old Joh Bjelke-Petersen praising
his efforts. (36)
The issue of government stability was possibly given emphasis by
the uncertainty caused by the late entry of One Nation into the
campaign. A number of observers, including Antony Green, claimed
that as voters were leaving Labor for independent candidates, 'the
most likely result is a hung Parliament'. (37) Even such
experienced commentators as John Wanna (Griffith University) and
Paul Reynolds (University of Queensland) believed the result would
be close. Wanna spoke of a possible five seat margin to the ALP,
while Reynolds surmised that Labor's seeming comfortable margin
prior to One Nation's re-emergence was now likely to have
disappeared, though he still predicted a narrow Labor win.
(38) Peter Botsman of the University of Queensland
predicted a Coalition victory. (39) In such an
atmosphere, the leadership issue and the question of governmental
stability might have helped persuade doubtful voters. Both Beattie
and Borbidge warned of the dangers of minority government and the
need for stability-if voters were concerned about this, presumably
Beattie gave the better chance of delivering it.
Ineffectiveness of the Opposition
The continued strong voter support for Labor meant that neither
the Nationals nor the Liberals was able to make any obvious inroad
into Labor's support. A number of newspapers spoke of the challenge
this gave the parties, especially as their leadership team was seen
as having been decidedly 'lacklustre' in its performance since the
1998 election. The Coalition was also criticised for its policy
inertia. The Townsville Bulletin , for instance, took it
to task for 'more than two years of sitting on its hands'.
(40) Even when Labor's popularity seemed to waver in
late 2000, the Newspoll findings (Appendix 1) suggested that the
apparent shifting from the Government that occurred in late 2000,
may have been voters by-passing the Coalition as they looked for
alternatives to the major parties.
As a measure of the Opposition's ineffectual performance,
Borbidge's approval rating remained significantly lower than that
of the Premier throughout the period between the two elections. In
a poll published three days before polling day, the advantage was
shown starkly, when Newspoll suggested a 'satisfaction with
leaders' gap of 40 percentage points in Brisbane (69:29 per cent).
Even outside of the capital, among voters not normally friendly
towards Labor, there was a gap of 34 percentage points (54:20 per
cent). (41) Anecdotal evidence suggested voter
disenchantment with Borbidge's negativity since losing the
Premiership. At the announcement of the election date, he seemed to
suggest that such criticism had hit home, when he promised
voters:
The whinging, whining Opposition you get in the adversarial
climate of the parliament has gone and we are now the alternative
government. (42)
By then it was probably far too late for him to reach
voters.
Coalition
disunity
The ineffectiveness of the Opposition was probably emphasised by
the obvious tensions that existed within and between the Coalition
parties. Apart from Borbidge's frustration over One Nation
preferences, there was also some doubt about Borbidge's keenness
for the leadership of his party. He had even flown a flag at one
stage that he was thinking of contesting the Commonwealth
electorate of Moncrieff, where the Liberals' Kathy Sullivan was
rumoured to be retiring at the next Commonwealth election. The
Courier-Mail expressed its amazement that, in effect,
Borbidge 'saw fit to remind voters how good the Beattie
Government's chances of another term are'. (43) Nothing
came of this, but it did not suggest a leader who was totally
focused on the State election.
A number of Liberals were publicly less than impressed with the
performance of their own leader, David Watson. Public expressions
of disappointment with his leadership had been expressed during
2000 by MLAs Bruce Davidson (Noosa) and Santo Santoro (Clayfield),
and in June 2000 Santoro stood down from the frontbench in protest
at his leader's labelling of him as 'an ego-driven prima donna'.
Elsewhere, Watson criticised 'certain colleagues...[who] lacked
political credibility and acumen', and he antagonised federal
colleagues by his refusal to defend Commonwealth Government petrol
excise policy. (44) Eventually, dissident Liberal voices
were sufficiently loud for former Northern Territory Chief Minister
and Queensland Liberal Party President, Paul Everingham, to call
for federal intervention to 'clean up' the Queensland division.
(45)
As long ago as 1977, Professor Don Aitkin made the claim that,
'There can be no doubt that the electorate prizes unity in its
parties ... and that it is alert to any signs of party or cabinet
dis unity'. (46) Academic research and the
experience of political practitioners would still agree with
Aitkin's words. The central message of the figures in Appendix 1 is
that the Beattie Government remained ahead of the Coalition
partners for the entire time between the 1998 and 2001 elections.
If the Premier's personal popularity was a factor, so, we might
suppose, was the generally difficult relationship between the
National and Liberal Parties and the intra-party bickering. As the
Courier-Mail lamented in mid-2000, while the parties
argued, 'the main business of government goes on without much
effective contribution from them'. (47) The position had
not altered by polling day 2001.
Federal
factors
Unpopular Commonwealth governments can make life very difficult
for State parties of the same political colour. It is impossible to
establish with any precision just how much this might influence
voting behaviour, but it is commonly accepted that often this has
to be considered as a possible factor in accounting for a State
election result. (48)
In both the Western Australian and Queensland elections in 2001,
claims were made that federal factors were of great importance. In
the West, for instance, former Liberal Deputy leader, Colin
Barnett, blamed the Commonwealth Government for the defeat of the
Court Government, singling out Commonwealth Minister for Forestry
and Conservation, Wilson Tuckey, himself a Western Australian, for
particular criticism. (49) Overall, however, it is
clear, that there were a number of local factors that seem to have
played a greater role than the popularity or otherwise of the
Howard Government. (50)
The argument is easier to sustain in the case of Queensland,
where a number of Coalition politicians certainly believed that
federal factors were important. These included the Liberal Party's
State Director, Graeme Jaeschke, who stated that there was no
denying that federal issues helped the Labor victory, while
National Senator, Ron Boswell, believed federal issues were 'at
play'. Doug Slack, MLA of 14 years standing, stated 'There's no
doubt if there had been a Labor government I would still be member
for Burnett'. (51)
Three aspects, at least, may have been important in giving some
substance to these views:
- The election occurred at a time when the media was running many
stories about the fall in voter support for the Howard Government.
It was therefore clearly to the Premier's advantage to confuse
federal and State matters, and some Queenslanders may have been
influenced by the Premier's criticism of what he described as the
unpopular policies of the Howard Government. In particular, Beattie
emphasised how significant the constant increases in the price of
petrol was for Queenslanders. To keep this issue in the public eye,
he even nominated 10 February as a 'day of protest' against petrol
prices, and he asked voters to send the Howard Government a message
on the issue by voting for Labor. (52) The fact that
only two weeks before the election the latest fuel excise rise
occurred, therefore played into Beattie's hands. Apart from petrol
prices, Senator Boswell nominated national competition policy, and
the Business Activity Statement involved in GST reporting, as
important for Queensland voters. (53) The victory in
Darling Downs of the independent, Ray Hopper, was said to have been
caused by opposition to dairy deregulation, something that was
believed to have been a factor in a number of seats in the State.
(54)
- The figures in Appendix 1 indicate a sharp fall in Liberal
support shortly before the election. What might have caused this
sudden drop? Although the local Liberal Party earned criticism for
its lack of vigour, this had been a constant media refrain
virtually since the 1998 election. Whether or not such criticism
had any impact on voters is difficult to establish, but it seems
unlikely that it would, of itself, have brought about such a sudden
fall. On the other hand, it is plausible that there may have been
something of a 'by-election factor' involved in voting in the
Queensland State election-voters could have hit out against
Commonwealth policies, despite this being a State election. Was
this akin to the defeat of the Tonkin Government in Western
Australia in 1974, or the unexpected near-defeat of the Dunstan
Government in South Australia in 1975, when unpopular Whitlam
Government policies seem to have affected the final vote in these
two State elections? (55)
- The entry of Pauline Hanson into the campaign seemed guaranteed
to keep federal issues prominent in voters' minds. Three days prior
to polling day, Ms Hanson probably ensured that would be the case
when she launched her party's policies in the Sunshine Coast
electorate of Caloundra. Her speech was basically a criticism of
the Commonwealth Government: its leader, its Treasurer, the sale of
Telstra, the failure to send boat people back from whence they
came, and the GST. Referring specifically to the Howard Government,
she asserted she was 'there to get rid of the bastards'.
(56) Whether or not she was correct, such a tactic
probably helped justify an anti-Coalition vote for some voters. At
least one Queensland newspaper felt it necessary to warn voters
that they must 'put into perspective' Hanson's 'list of federal
grievances'. (57)
A postscript to the Queensland election-the
by-election in Ryan
It would not normally be relevant to refer to a Commonwealth
by-election in a study of a State general election. However, the
proximity of the by-election (17 March) to the State election (17
February), the large movement of voters to the ALP in both, and the
widespread assumption that together they could be read as presaging
another large movement of voters in the forthcoming Commonwealth
election, all suggest that a brief note on the by-election is not
out of place in this paper.
Ryan was created in 1949. Between then and 2001 it had just two
representatives, both Liberal.The retiring member, John Moore, had
held the seat since 1975. After the 1998 election it was the
fifth-safest Coalition electorate in Queensland. In that election,
Moore's first preference margin over Labor was 20.1 per cent, and
19.0 per cent in two-party-preferred terms. It was therefore
unlikely to fall to Labor in normal circumstances. In fact, Labor's
first response to the by-election was to question the wisdom of
even running a candidate. According to the Leader of the
Opposition, the by-election was unlikely to be an indicator 'about
anything much at all'. (58)
Despite this early uncertainty, Labor eventually decided to
contest the by-election. By the time the campaign began, the change
in the fortunes of the parties saw Labor's candidate, Leonie Short,
campaigning as if the seat was winnable. The Liberals' Bob Tucker
certainly did not assume the result was another inevitable Liberal
victory. Tucker's campaign included the mail-out of a personal
video detailing his background and ideas for the future. As was the
case with the State election, Tucker's discussion of such
local-level matters as local crime and congestion of local roads,
showed yet again how issues cross borders in a federal
system-presumably this was intended to contrast him with the
performance of the previous sitting member. The blurring of federal
boundaries was probably exaggerated by the regular presence of
Premier Beattie in the campaign.
Tucker finished 3398 first preferences ahead of Short. Labor
gained a first preference swing of 8.3 per cent; the Liberal
slippage was 7.2 per cent. Short eventually won the electorate on
preferences, and by 0.4 per cent in two-party-preferred terms.
Labor's share of the two-party-preferred vote had increased by 9.7
per cent. (59)
Most observers put the result down to a loss of popularity of
the Howard Government rather than a positive acceptance of the
Opposition's policies. The research and strategic marketing firm,
Marketshare, analysed swing voters, and noted certain 'key factors
associated with the primary swing to the ALP':
- where persons in the construction industry (ranging from
engineers to labourers) comprised 5.5 per cent of all workers in a
voting area, the swing exceeded 8 per cent
- such a movement of votes was exacerbated in any area with a
high proportion of retail employees.
- age seemed important, so that the proportion of 35-55 year-olds
'was positively related to the ALP swing', and
- households in the $50 000-65 000 bracket 'were most likely to
swing from Liberal to Labor'.
These findings seemed to suggest a loss of support for the
Government among such categories of voter. (60)
Some observers, including the Prime Minister, described the Ryan
result as a 'protest' vote, an interpretation implying that such
voters were likely to 'come back to us in the general election'.
(61) By contrast, others put the emphasis on Ryan as
'the beginning of the end' for a government whose days were
numbered. In fact, a lot of assertions (and counter-assertions)
were made about whether the Ryan result could be called another
'Bass' (1975) or 'Canberra' (1995), by-elections that gave what
could later be seen as a clear indication of the terminal position
of the Whitlam and Keating Governments, respectively.
(62) Such speculation is essentially futile before the
event, for it would only be possible to so label Ryan if the
Coalition actually lost the 2001 election. One possible protest
factor that did not feature in the post-election discussion was the
controversy over the Liberal Party's preselection for Ryan, which
had caused public protest over the barring of a prominent candidate
from the preselection ballot.
Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business,
Tony Abbott, was one observer who did not believe Ryan to be any
type of harbinger of inevitable electoral doom. In an address to
the Sydney Institute three days after polling, he spoke of what he
described as three forces in Australia 'that were driving a sense
of crisis':
- 'a long standing popular disquiet' that was a product of both
the pace of change in Australian society, as well as the 'human
cost of economic re-structuring'
- 'elite resentment of the Howard Government's social
conservatism', and
- the propensity for the Opposition to seize on bad news 'to talk
Australia down'.
Giving a voice to these factors was the 'bad press' that was
'almost a "given" of Australian politics'. The result, according to
the Minister, was that people who are 'essentially conservative',
had become 'Labor's polling booth fodder'. The message implied in
Abbott's analysis was that the Government's position could be
restored, providing it could succeed in combating what he labelled
the Labor- and media-inspired 'culture of despair'. (63)
Although disagreeing with much of Abbott's analysis, Leader of the
Opposition, Kim Beazley, seemed to be in agreement about the value
of Ryan as a predictor of the 2001 election: 'I don't read into
this an ultimate election victory for the Labor Party'.
(64)
Another possible factor was resentment at an unnecessary
by-election. Writing in the Canberra Times shortly before
polling day, Malcolm Mackerras asserted that a Liberal defeat would
be 'the result of growing public anger at politicians resigning
their seats'. (65) He offered no evidence for this view.
However, Newman's recent work on by-elections has suggested that
voters may well react differently if a House of Representatives
by-election is caused by death, rather than by a resignation.
Between 1949 and 2001, the average two-party-preferred swing away
from the party holding the electorate has been 2.5 per cent after a
death, and 4.9 per cent after a resignation. In the past twenty
years, indeed, the latter figure has been 5.8 per cent, suggesting
an increasingly jaundiced electorate reacting to by-elections that
could have been avoided. (66) The 'voter resentment'
thesis may have also been lent weight by Prime Minister Howard's
claim that he had agreed to the resignation of John Moore only
after commissioned polling had suggested that the Liberals would
retain Ryan easily. (67) If that polling was accurate,
it suggests a massive shift of support in a very short time.
Whether or not Ryan is eventually seen as another 'Bass' or
'Canberra', it is likely to be remembered as a by-election that was
part of a much bigger picture than just the replacement of a single
MHR. Whatever the fate of the Howard Government, the State
elections in Western Australia and Queensland, plus the Ryan
contest, are likely to be regarded as indicators of a general loss
of support for the national Government. An editorial in a rural
Queensland newspaper indicated how likely this was, when, even
before a vote had been cast in Ryan, the writer could assert that
the Prime Minister would:
... mark down the first three months of 2001 as the time when,
not only the voters of Ryan, but the voters of Australia sent him a
message. (68)
Endnotes
- Glenn Worthington, 'Western Australian Election 2001', Current Issues Brief no. 10, 2000-01 ,
Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra.
- John Wanna, 'A conservative debacle: the electoral rout in
Queensland 2001', Austalasian Parliamentary Review , vol.
16, no. 1, Autumn 2001, pp. 36-7; Scott Bennett, 'The Ehrmann
Case-Aberration or Symptom?', Research Note no. 10,
2000-01 , Department of the Parliamentary Library,
Canberra.
- Matthew Franklin, 'It helps to be an SOB',
Courier-Mail , 27 November 2000.
- Paul Syvret, 'Queensland's One Man Band', Bulletin , 6
February 2001.
- 'ALP keeps the faith and its majority', Australian , 7
February 2000; Gold Coast Bulletin , 24 January
2001.
- Antony Green, '1999 Queensland redistribution: analysis of
final boundaries', Research Bulletin 99/9, Queensland
Parliamentary Library, December 1999.
- Scott Bennett and Gerard Newman, 'Victorian Election 1999',
Research Paper
no. 19, 1999-2000 , Department of the Parliamentary Library,
Canberra, p. 7.
- Wanna, op. cit., p. 40.
- Australian , 26 January 2001, Courier-Mail ,
2 February 2001; Wanna, op. cit., p. 41.
- Paul Syvret, 'Queensland's One Man Band', Bulletin , 6
February 2001, p. 18.
- Australian , 15 February 2001.
- Courier-Mail , 10 February 2001.
- 'Labor better chance to see state right', editorial,
Courier-Mail , 16 February 2001.
- See, for example, 'Showdown looms for Libs, Nats',
Australian , 10 March 2000; 'Three-way contest for Albert
seat', Gold Coast Bulletin, 26 May 2000; 'Liberal
candidate's doubts fire Nats' fury at Coalition partner',
Australian , 5 June 2000; 'Poll contest strains Lib, Nat
unity', Courier-Mail , 9 October 2000.
- Australian , 13 February 2001, Sydney Morning
Herald, 1 February 2001, Australian , 9 February
2001.
- 'Shocked Feldman vows to fight on', Courier-Mail , 19
February 2001.
- Jacob Greber, 'Former One Nation voters hold the key;'
Courier-Mail , 24 January 2001.
- Scott Bennett, 'The Decline in Support for the Major Parties
and the Prospect of Minority Government', Research Paper no. 10,
1998-99 , Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra;
Scott Bennett and Gerard Newman, 'New South Wales Election 1999',
Research Paper no.
22, 1998-99 , Department of the Parliamentary Library,
Canberra, p. 6, Worthington, op. cit. ,
p. 18.
- Age , 17 February 2001.
- John Wanna, 'Queensland July to December 1999', Australian
Journal of Politics and History , vol. 46, no. 2, June 2000,
p. 244.
- For the fate of the 11 One Nation MPs elected in 1998, see >
Appendix 2 .
- Gerard Newman, '1998 Queensland Election', Current Issues Brief no. 2,
1998-99 , Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra, p.
4.
- Courier-Mail , 24 January 2001.
- 'Buoyant Greens set their sights on Senate seat',
Courier-Mail , 19 February 2001.
- Jim Downey, 'Democrat vote holding in polls', Media Release, 21
February 2001; Meg Lees, 'Statement', 27 February 2001.
- Gerard Newman, 'Western Australian Election 2001: Statistical
Analysis', Current Issues Brief no.
14, 2000-01 , p. 31.
- John Wanna to author, 17 April 2001.
- Worthington, op. cit. , p. 5.
- For more on three-cornered contests, see Scott Bennett,
Winning and Losing , Melbourne University Press,
Melbourne, 1996, pp. 52-3, Scott Bennett and Gerard Newman, 'New
South Wales Election 1999' , Research Paper no. 22,
1998-99 , Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra,
pp. 14-15, Scott Bennett and Gerard Newman, 'Victorian Election
1999', Research
Paper no. 19, 1999-2000 , Department of the Parliamentary
Library, Canberra, pp. 5-6.
- Australian , 19 February 2001.
- 'Beattie returns to ALP's roots for fresh start', Canberra
Times , 22 January 2001.
- Gold Coast Bulletin , 12 January 2001.
- Australian , 16 January 2001.
- 'Labor better chance to see state right', editorial,
Courier-Mail , 16 February 2001.
- 'State needs stability', Townsville Bulletin , 17
February 2001.
- Australian , 12 January 2001.
- Sydney Morning Herald , 24 January 2001.
- Wanna quoted in Courier-Mail , 17 February 2001,
Reynolds quoted in Townsville Bulletin , 17 February
2001.
- 'Labor the analysts' favourite', Courier-Mail , 17
February 2001.
- 'State needs stability', Townsville Bulletin , 17
February 2001; 'Fighting for his political life', Australian
Financial Review , 24 January 2001.
- Australian , 14 February 2001.
- Australian , 25 January 2001.
- 'Borbidge and his political opportunities',
Courier-Mail , 16 June 2000.
- Tracey Arklay, 'Queensland January to June 2000',
Australian Journal of Politics and History , vol. 46, no.
4, December 2000, p. 577.
- 'Powerbroker quits front bench in Liberal feud',
Australian , 8 June 2000.
- Don Aitkin, Stability and change in Australian
politics , Australian National University Press, Canberra,
1977, p. 246.
- 'Borbidge and his political opportunities',
Courier-Mail , 16 June 2000.
- Scott Bennett, Affairs of State. Politics in the Australian
States and Territories , Allen and Unwin, Sydney, 1992, pp.
192-3
- 'Scapegoat search reaches Canberra', West Australian ,
12 February 2001.
- Worthington, op. cit. , p. 17.
- Courier-Mail , 19 February 2001.
- Gold Coast Bulletin , 7 February 2001; Weekend
Australian , 10-11 February 2001.
- Courier-Mail , 19 February 2001.
- Courier-Mail , 26 February 2001;
www.rayhopper.net.
- Scott Bennett, Affairs of State , op. cit., pp.
192-3.
- Australian , 15 February 2001.
- 'State needs stability', Townsville Bulletin , 17
February 2001.
- 'Labor may not contest Moore's safe seat', Australian
Financial Review , 21 December 2000.
- Figures from Australian Electoral Commission: http://www.aec.gov.au/ryan/results/post/qldryan.htm
.
- 'Construction industry and middle income earners most likely to
switch from Liberal to Labor at Federal election', Marketshare News
Release, 30 March 2001, p. 1.
- 'Howard vows to woo back Ryan voters next time', Australian
Financial Review , 26 March 2001.
- For example, Dean Jaensch, 'Ryan by-election could be like
Whitlam's Bass of 1975', Advertiser , 15 March 2001.
- Tony Abbott, 'Against Roonism-Combating the Culture of
Despair', speech to Sydney Institute, 20 March 2001.
- 'Bruised but defiant Howard plots to woo Ryan swingers',
Gold Coast Bulletin , 20 March 2001.
- Malcolm Mackerras, 'Electoral anger at Liberal "rats" ',
Canberra Times , 21 March 2001.
- Gerard Newman, 'House of Representatives By-elections
1949-2001', Current Issues Brief no.
12, 2000-01 , p. 6.
- 'Howard accepts blame for by-election loss', Age , 28
March 2001.
- 'The State decides', Queensland Times (Ipswich), 17
March 2001.
Appendix 1: Voter support 1998-2001
'If a State election was held in Queensland today, which one of
the following would you vote for?
If "uncommitted", to which one of these do you have a
leaning?'
|
ALP
%
|
LIB
%
|
NP
%
|
PHON
%
|
GREEN
%
|
AD
%
|
OTHERS
%
|
Election
13 Jun 1998
|
38.8
|
16.1
|
15.2
|
22.7
|
2.4
|
1.6
|
3.2
|
Newspoll
Jan-Mar 1999
|
48
|
26
|
13
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
Newspoll
Apr-Jun 1999
|
47
|
24
|
16
|
5
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
Newspoll
Jul-Sep 1999
|
48
|
24
|
16
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Newspoll
Oct-Dec 1999
|
45
|
28
|
16
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
4
|
Newspoll
Jan-Mar 2000
|
47
|
26
|
13
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
8
|
Newspoll
Apr-Jun 2000
|
50
|
22
|
15
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
8
|
Newspoll
Jul-Sep 2000
|
49
|
23
|
15
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
6
|
Newspoll
Oct-Dec 2000
|
43
|
23
|
16
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
9
|
Newspoll
30 Jan-1 Feb
|
52
|
18
|
16
|
4
|
3
|
n.a.
|
7
|
Newspoll
14-15 Feb
|
49
|
13
|
13
|
12
|
2
|
n.a.
|
11
|
Election
17 Feb 2001
|
49
|
14
|
14
|
9
|
3
|
0.3
|
11
|
Sources: Courier-Mail , 24 January 2001, Weekend
Australian , 17-18 February 2001.
Appendix 2: One Nation MLAs elected 1998
Member
|
Electorate
|
Won from
|
Affiliation at
2001 election
|
2001 election
fate
|
Electorate affiliation
after 2001
|
Harry Black
|
Whitsunday
|
ALP
|
CCA
|
Defeated
|
ALP
|
David Dalgleish
|
Hervey Bay
|
ALP
|
CCA
|
Defeated
|
ALP
|
Bill Feldman
|
Caboolture
|
ALP
|
CCA
|
Defeated (Pumicestone)
|
ALP
|
John Kingston
|
Maryborough
|
ALP
|
Independent
|
Retained electorate
|
Independent
|
Jeff Knuth
|
Burdekin
|
NPA
|
CCA
|
Defeated
|
ALP
|
Shaun Nelson
|
Tablelands
|
NPA
|
Independent
|
Defeated
|
ON
|
Jack Paff
|
Ipswich West
|
ALP
|
CCA
|
Defeated
|
ALP
|
Dolly Pratt
|
Barambah
|
NPA
|
Independent
|
Won (Nanango)
|
Independent
|
Peter Prenzler
|
Lockyer
|
NPA
|
CCA
|
Defeated
|
ON
|
Charles Rappolt
|
Mulgrave
|
NPA
|
Resigned Parliament 1998
|
Won by ALP, by-election
|
ALP
|
Ken Turner
|
Thuringowa
|
ALP
|
Independent
|
Defeated
|
ALP
|
Appendix 3: Results
Table 1 Legislative Assembly:
State Summary
|
Candidates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian Labor Party
|
89
|
66
|
1 007 737
|
48.93
|
+22
|
+10.07
|
Liberal Party
|
50
|
3
|
294 968
|
14.32
|
-6
|
-1.77
|
National Party
|
45
|
12
|
291 605
|
14.16
|
-11
|
-1.01
|
Pauline Hanson's One Nation
|
39
|
3
|
179 076
|
8.69
|
-8
|
-13.99
|
The Greens
|
31
|
|
51 630
|
2.51
|
|
+0.15
|
City Country Alliance
|
25
|
|
49 263
|
2.39
|
|
+2.39
|
Australian Democrats
|
6
|
|
7 029
|
0.34
|
|
-1.27
|
Christian Democratic Party
|
1
|
|
919
|
0.04
|
|
-0.07
|
Independents
|
77
|
5
|
177 334
|
8.61
|
+3
|
+5.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal Votes
|
|
|
2 059 561
|
97.73
|
|
-0.82
|
Informal Votes
|
|
|
47 849
|
2.27
|
|
+0.82
|
Total/Turnout
|
363
|
89
|
2 107 410
|
92.59
|
|
-0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electors Enrolled
|
|
|
2 276 044
|
|
|
|
Table 2a Legislative Assembly: First
Preference Votes, District Summary
Number
District
|
ALP
|
LP
|
NP
|
ON
|
GRN
|
CCA
|
Oth
|
Formal
|
Informal
|
Total
|
Enrolled
|
Albert
|
11 551
|
3 092
|
2 725
|
5 438
|
|
|
|
22 806
|
578
|
23 384
|
25 364
|
Algester
|
15 709
|
5 343
|
|
|
|
|
2 494
|
23 546
|
632
|
24 178
|
25 796
|
Ashgrove
|
13 630
|
7 263
|
|
|
1 459
|
|
2 223
|
24 575
|
414
|
24 989
|
26 977
|
Aspley
|
13 150
|
10 894
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 044
|
770
|
24 814
|
26 372
|
Barron River
|
9 511
|
3 588
|
|
3 587
|
1 212
|
|
4 213
|
22 111
|
336
|
22 447
|
24 818
|
Beaudesert
|
8 868
|
|
8 297
|
7 680
|
|
|
1 166
|
26 011
|
433
|
26 444
|
28 051
|
Brisbane Central
|
14 894
|
4 839
|
|
|
1 579
|
|
1 698
|
23 010
|
441
|
23 451
|
26 646
|
Broadwater
|
12 388
|
|
11 231
|
|
|
|
|
23 619
|
1 092
|
24 711
|
27 267
|
Bulimba
|
16 295
|
5 960
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 255
|
814
|
23 069
|
25 208
|
Bundaberg
|
15 812
|
|
8 552
|
|
|
|
|
24 364
|
1 079
|
25 443
|
27 155
|
Bundamba
|
15 356
|
3 196
|
|
|
2 881
|
|
|
21 433
|
896
|
22 329
|
23 897
|
Burdekin
|
7 808
|
|
4 836
|
4 180
|
|
4 439
|
|
21 263
|
341
|
21 604
|
23 291
|
Burleigh
|
11 445
|
|
10 020
|
4 385
|
|
|
|
25 850
|
588
|
26 438
|
29 191
|
Burnett
|
11 169
|
|
10 433
|
|
|
|
|
21 602
|
1 179
|
22 781
|
24 416
|
Cairns
|
11 170
|
|
4 819
|
4 394
|
1 297
|
|
|
21 680
|
419
|
22 099
|
24 882
|
Callide
|
5 694
|
|
9 598
|
8 648
|
|
|
|
23 940
|
424
|
24 364
|
25 950
|
Caloundra
|
8 658
|
9 200
|
|
4 555
|
|
|
1 430
|
23 843
|
423
|
24 266
|
26 046
|
Capalaba
|
10 577
|
3 051
|
|
2 958
|
|
|
7 668
|
24 254
|
633
|
24 887
|
26 328
|
Charters Towers
|
7 575
|
|
5 984
|
3 745
|
|
|
|
17 304
|
165
|
17 469
|
18 645
|
Chatsworth
|
14 530
|
6 813
|
|
2 813
|
1 389
|
|
|
25 545
|
532
|
26 077
|
27 566
|
Clayfield
|
10 839
|
9 948
|
|
|
1 228
|
|
1 582
|
23 597
|
394
|
23 991
|
26 067
|
Cleveland
|
13 529
|
5 880
|
|
|
|
|
4 099
|
23 508
|
613
|
24 121
|
25 779
|
Cook
|
10 727
|
|
2 610
|
3 465
|
|
|
|
16 802
|
282
|
17 084
|
19 587
|
Cunningham
|
5 686
|
3 368
|
5 661
|
4 700
|
|
502
|
2 834
|
22 751
|
301
|
23 052
|
24 787
|
Currumbin
|
13 801
|
6 251
|
|
3 823
|
|
|
590
|
24 465
|
421
|
24 886
|
27 294
|
Darling Downs
|
4 749
|
|
8 855
|
|
|
|
9 069
|
22 673
|
400
|
23 073
|
24 272
|
Everton
|
15 719
|
6 990
|
|
|
|
2 302
|
|
25 011
|
517
|
25 528
|
27 058
|
Ferny Grove
|
16 466
|
6 756
|
|
|
2 774
|
|
|
25 996
|
599
|
26 595
|
28 114
|
Fitzroy
|
13 599
|
|
6 187
|
|
|
1 879
|
|
21 665
|
351
|
22 016
|
23 457
|
Gaven
|
9 969
|
|
7 178
|
|
1 839
|
|
2 479
|
21 465
|
767
|
22 232
|
24 357
|
Gladstone
|
10 992
|
|
571
|
|
450
|
|
12 336
|
24 349
|
285
|
24 634
|
26 088
|
Glass House
|
9 989
|
2 612
|
4 408
|
4 993
|
1 628
|
867
|
|
24 497
|
439
|
24 936
|
26 683
|
Greenslopes
|
13 744
|
7 639
|
|
|
2 491
|
915
|
|
24 789
|
498
|
25 287
|
27 320
|
Gregory
|
6 897
|
|
10 047
|
|
|
|
|
16 944
|
476
|
17 420
|
18 723
|
Gympie
|
8 563
|
|
6 330
|
6 587
|
|
4 139
|
|
25 619
|
399
|
26 018
|
27 757
|
Hervey Bay
|
9 707
|
|
3 915
|
4 186
|
|
4 193
|
723
|
22 724
|
379
|
23 103
|
24 613
|
Hinchinbrook
|
5 313
|
|
5 862
|
5 362
|
|
270
|
3 534
|
20 341
|
362
|
20 703
|
22 236
|
Inala
|
14 434
|
2 180
|
|
|
|
|
4 585
|
21 199
|
551
|
21 750
|
23 269
|
Indooroopilly
|
9 028
|
8 686
|
|
879
|
2 351
|
|
2 375
|
23 319
|
260
|
23 579
|
26 105
|
Ipswich
|
12 282
|
2 641
|
|
5 237
|
642
|
243
|
3 610
|
24 655
|
410
|
25 065
|
26 593
|
Ipswich West
|
10 768
|
|
4 469
|
6 002
|
1 016
|
1 200
|
|
23 455
|
390
|
23 845
|
25 180
|
Kallangur
|
13 312
|
4 366
|
|
|
1 656
|
1 740
|
1 750
|
22 824
|
642
|
23 466
|
25 045
|
Kawana
|
10 446
|
9 438
|
|
4 708
|
|
|
|
24 592
|
496
|
25 088
|
26 943
|
Keppel
|
9 281
|
|
9 285
|
|
|
3 030
|
|
21 596
|
404
|
22 000
|
23 668
|
Kurwongbah
|
16 889
|
5 757
|
|
|
1 762
|
963
|
1 460
|
26 831
|
663
|
27 494
|
29 147
|
Lockyer
|
6 428
|
|
3 947
|
6 608
|
665
|
4 197
|
1 495
|
23 340
|
434
|
23 774
|
25 189
|
Logan
|
15 645
|
|
6 001
|
|
|
|
|
21 646
|
1 275
|
22 921
|
24 752
|
Lytton
|
16 305
|
5 329
|
|
|
2 736
|
|
|
24 370
|
697
|
25 067
|
26 483
|
Mackay
|
14 235
|
|
7 594
|
|
|
2 433
|
|
24 262
|
580
|
24 842
|
27 063
|
Mansfield
|
13 296
|
8 646
|
|
|
|
|
2 960
|
24 902
|
463
|
25 365
|
27 018
|
Maroochydore
|
9 762
|
|
9 446
|
4 530
|
|
|
|
23 738
|
492
|
24 230
|
26 914
|
Maryborough
|
10 081
|
|
3 492
|
|
|
1 844
|
8 579
|
23 996
|
582
|
24 578
|
25 833
|
Mirani
|
7 296
|
|
7 672
|
4 729
|
|
|
2 275
|
21 972
|
303
|
22 275
|
23 623
|
Moggill
|
9 408
|
9 872
|
|
|
1 566
|
|
3 618
|
24 464
|
373
|
24 837
|
26 733
|
Mt Coot-tha
|
11 741
|
6 135
|
|
|
2 740
|
|
2 409
|
23 025
|
348
|
23 373
|
26 343
|
Mt Gravatt
|
13 187
|
6 509
|
|
2 248
|
1 141
|
|
1 066
|
24 151
|
490
|
24 641
|
26 271
|
Mt Isa
|
8 981
|
|
3 220
|
3 384
|
|
|
|
15 585
|
216
|
15 801
|
17 811
|
Mt Ommaney
|
12 483
|
4 731
|
|
|
1 141
|
|
5 657
|
24 012
|
322
|
24 334
|
26 213
|
Mudgeeraba
|
9 371
|
6 952
|
|
|
2 025
|
|
4 334
|
22 682
|
750
|
23 432
|
25 732
|
Mulgrave
|
11 903
|
|
4 443
|
5 847
|
|
|
|
22 193
|
383
|
22 576
|
24 503
|
Mundingburra
|
11 640
|
6 780
|
|
4 056
|
904
|
439
|
|
23 819
|
484
|
24 303
|
26 566
|
Murrumba
|
14 839
|
4 498
|
|
|
|
|
4 408
|
23 745
|
635
|
24 380
|
25 882
|
Nanango
|
5 882
|
|
5 400
|
|
|
|
9 680
|
20 962
|
451
|
21 413
|
22 710
|
Nicklin
|
4 224
|
2 305
|
1 941
|
3 992
|
932
|
|
11 554
|
24 948
|
304
|
25 252
|
27 249
|
Noosa
|
10 828
|
10 391
|
|
4 543
|
|
|
|
25 762
|
486
|
26 248
|
28 739
|
Nudgee
|
18 252
|
6 042
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 294
|
882
|
25 176
|
26 860
|
Pumicestone
|
11 360
|
4 380
|
|
3 953
|
610
|
3 805
|
453
|
24 561
|
439
|
25 000
|
26 648
|
Redcliffe
|
13 989
|
5 789
|
|
|
|
866
|
4 091
|
24 735
|
606
|
25 341
|
27 292
|
Redlands
|
10 797
|
|
6 500
|
|
|
1 731
|
3 210
|
22 238
|
611
|
22 849
|
24 229
|
Robina
|
10 909
|
12 822
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 731
|
1 171
|
24 902
|
27 655
|
Rockhampton
|
15 926
|
|
5 053
|
|
|
2 056
|
|
23 035
|
592
|
23 627
|
25 306
|
Sandgate
|
16 242
|
4 890
|
|
|
|
|
3 179
|
24 311
|
565
|
24 876
|
26 426
|
South Brisbane
|
14 329
|
4 720
|
|
|
2 150
|
|
2 725
|
23 924
|
638
|
24 562
|
27 729
|
Southern Downs
|
6 459
|
|
13 092
|
|
|
|
5 818
|
25 369
|
451
|
25 820
|
27 551
|
Southport
|
11 245
|
|
6 434
|
3 351
|
|
|
1 083
|
22 113
|
551
|
22 664
|
25 127
|
Springwood
|
11 192
|
3 590
|
4 613
|
|
|
|
5 140
|
24 535
|
624
|
25 159
|
27 138
|
Stafford
|
16 190
|
5 982
|
|
|
2 590
|
|
|
24 762
|
591
|
25 353
|
27 169
|
Stretton
|
14 778
|
8 805
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 583
|
894
|
24 477
|
26 604
|
Surfers Paradise
|
9 259
|
|
12 033
|
|
2 899
|
|
|
24 191
|
784
|
24 975
|
28 321
|
Tablelands
|
5 325
|
|
3 522
|
7 722
|
|
|
4 889
|
21 458
|
313
|
21 771
|
23 448
|
Thuringowa
|
9 952
|
2 447
|
4 532
|
|
|
762
|
6 569
|
24 262
|
633
|
24 895
|
26 763
|
Toowoomba North
|
9 772
|
|
8 795
|
|
|
1 529
|
2 061
|
22 157
|
527
|
22 684
|
24 335
|
Toowoomba South
|
7 439
|
|
10 028
|
4 577
|
|
|
857
|
22 901
|
374
|
23 275
|
25 152
|
Townsville
|
11 494
|
7 848
|
|
|
|
|
2 775
|
22 117
|
725
|
22 842
|
25 513
|
Warrego
|
3 243
|
|
6 737
|
4 733
|
|
|
5 193
|
19 906
|
239
|
20 145
|
21 600
|
Waterford
|
12 378
|
3 267
|
|
5 465
|
|
|
910
|
22 020
|
625
|
22 645
|
24 793
|
Whitsunday
|
10 026
|
|
5 237
|
2 677
|
|
2 919
|
799
|
21 658
|
334
|
21 992
|
24 015
|
Woodridge
|
11 992
|
1 272
|
|
4 336
|
|
|
3 330
|
20 930
|
579
|
21 509
|
23 605
|
Yeerongpilly
|
15 135
|
5 215
|
|
|
1 877
|
|
2 247
|
24 474
|
545
|
25 019
|
27 130
|
Total
|
1 007 737
|
294 968
|
291 605
|
179 076
|
51 630
|
49 263
|
185 282
|
2 059 561
|
47 849
|
2 107 410
|
2 276 044
|
Regions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brisbane
|
523 329
|
203 494
|
21 583
|
29 938
|
37 169
|
9 960
|
78 494
|
903 967
|
22 432
|
926 399
|
997 137
|
Gold/Sunshine
Coasts
|
165 205
|
67 443
|
65 416
|
48 271
|
9 933
|
4 672
|
21 923
|
382 863
|
9 781
|
392 644
|
429 530
|
Regional/Rural
|
319 203
|
24 031
|
204 606
|
100 867
|
4 528
|
34 631
|
84 865
|
772 731
|
15 636
|
788 367
|
849 377
|
Table 2b Legislative Assembly:
First Preference Votes, District Summary
Per
cent
District
|
ALP
|
LP
|
NP
|
ON
|
GRN
|
CCA
|
Oth
|
Formal
|
Informal
|
Total
|
Albert
|
50.6
|
13.6
|
11.9
|
23.8
|
|
|
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
92.2
|
Algester
|
66.7
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
97.4
|
2.6
|
93.7
|
Ashgrove
|
55.5
|
29.6
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
9.0
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
92.6
|
Aspley
|
54.7
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.9
|
3.1
|
94.1
|
Barron River
|
43.0
|
16.2
|
|
16.2
|
5.5
|
|
19.1
|
98.5
|
1.5
|
90.4
|
Beaudesert
|
34.1
|
|
31.9
|
29.5
|
|
|
4.5
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
94.3
|
Brisbane Central
|
64.7
|
21.0
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
7.4
|
98.1
|
1.9
|
88.0
|
Broadwater
|
52.4
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
|
95.6
|
4.4
|
90.6
|
Bulimba
|
73.2
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
3.5
|
91.5
|
Bundaberg
|
64.9
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
95.8
|
4.2
|
93.7
|
Bundamba
|
71.6
|
14.9
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
96.0
|
4.0
|
93.4
|
Burdekin
|
36.7
|
|
22.7
|
19.7
|
|
20.9
|
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
92.8
|
Burleigh
|
44.3
|
|
38.8
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
97.8
|
2.2
|
90.6
|
Burnett
|
51.7
|
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
5.2
|
93.3
|
Cairns
|
51.5
|
|
22.2
|
20.3
|
6.0
|
|
|
98.1
|
1.9
|
88.8
|
Callide
|
23.8
|
|
40.1
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
93.9
|
Caloundra
|
36.3
|
38.6
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
6.0
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
93.2
|
Capalaba
|
43.6
|
12.6
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
31.6
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
94.5
|
Charters Towers
|
43.8
|
|
34.6
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
99.1
|
0.9
|
93.7
|
Chatsworth
|
56.9
|
26.7
|
|
11.0
|
5.4
|
|
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
94.6
|
Clayfield
|
45.9
|
42.2
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
6.7
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
92.0
|
Cleveland
|
57.6
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
93.6
|
Cook
|
63.8
|
|
15.5
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
87.2
|
Cunningham
|
25.0
|
14.8
|
24.9
|
20.7
|
|
2.2
|
12.5
|
98.7
|
1.3
|
93.0
|
Currumbin
|
56.4
|
25.6
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
2.4
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
91.2
|
Darling Downs
|
20.9
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
95.1
|
Everton
|
62.8
|
27.9
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
94.3
|
Ferny Grove
|
63.3
|
26.0
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
97.7
|
2.3
|
94.6
|
Fitzroy
|
62.8
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
93.9
|
Gaven
|
46.4
|
|
33.4
|
|
8.6
|
|
11.5
|
96.6
|
3.4
|
91.3
|
Gladstone
|
45.1
|
|
2.3
|
|
1.8
|
|
50.7
|
98.8
|
1.2
|
94.4
|
Glass House
|
40.8
|
10.7
|
18.0
|
20.4
|
6.6
|
3.5
|
|
98.2
|
1.8
|
93.5
|
Greenslopes
|
55.4
|
30.8
|
|
|
10.0
|
3.7
|
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
92.6
|
Gregory
|
40.7
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
2.7
|
93.0
|
Gympie
|
33.4
|
|
24.7
|
25.7
|
|
16.2
|
|
98.5
|
1.5
|
93.7
|
Hervey Bay
|
42.7
|
|
17.2
|
18.4
|
|
18.5
|
3.2
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
93.9
|
Hinchinbrook
|
26.1
|
|
28.8
|
26.4
|
|
1.3
|
17.4
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
93.1
|
Inala
|
68.1
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
93.5
|
Indooroopilly
|
38.7
|
37.2
|
|
3.8
|
10.1
|
|
10.2
|
98.9
|
1.1
|
90.3
|
Ipswich
|
49.8
|
10.7
|
|
21.2
|
2.6
|
1.0
|
14.6
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
94.3
|
Ipswich West
|
45.9
|
|
19.1
|
25.6
|
4.3
|
5.1
|
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
94.7
|
Kallangur
|
58.3
|
19.1
|
|
|
7.3
|
7.6
|
7.7
|
97.3
|
2.7
|
93.7
|
Kawana
|
42.5
|
38.4
|
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
93.1
|
Keppel
|
43.0
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
98.2
|
1.8
|
93.0
|
Kurwongbah
|
62.9
|
21.5
|
|
|
6.6
|
3.6
|
5.4
|
97.6
|
2.4
|
94.3
|
Lockyer
|
27.5
|
|
16.9
|
28.3
|
2.8
|
18.0
|
6.4
|
98.2
|
1.8
|
94.4
|
Logan
|
72.3
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
|
94.4
|
5.6
|
92.6
|
Lytton
|
66.9
|
21.9
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
97.2
|
2.8
|
94.7
|
Mackay
|
58.7
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
97.7
|
2.3
|
91.8
|
Mansfield
|
53.4
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
98.2
|
1.8
|
93.9
|
Maroochydore
|
41.1
|
|
39.8
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
90.0
|
Maryborough
|
42.0
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
7.7
|
35.8
|
97.6
|
2.4
|
95.1
|
Mirani
|
33.2
|
|
34.9
|
21.5
|
|
|
10.4
|
98.6
|
1.4
|
94.3
|
Moggill
|
38.5
|
40.4
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
14.8
|
98.5
|
1.5
|
92.9
|
Mt Coot-tha
|
51.0
|
26.6
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
10.5
|
98.5
|
1.5
|
88.7
|
Mt Gravatt
|
54.6
|
27.0
|
|
9.3
|
4.7
|
|
4.4
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
93.8
|
Mt Isa
|
57.6
|
|
20.7
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
98.6
|
1.4
|
88.7
|
Mt Ommaney
|
52.0
|
19.7
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
23.6
|
98.7
|
1.3
|
92.8
|
Mudgeeraba
|
41.3
|
30.6
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
19.1
|
96.8
|
3.2
|
91.1
|
Mulgrave
|
53.6
|
|
20.0
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
92.1
|
Mundingburra
|
48.9
|
28.5
|
|
17.0
|
3.8
|
1.8
|
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
91.5
|
Murrumba
|
62.5
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
97.4
|
2.6
|
94.2
|
Nanango
|
28.1
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
97.9
|
2.1
|
94.3
|
Nicklin
|
16.9
|
9.2
|
7.8
|
16.0
|
3.7
|
|
46.3
|
98.8
|
1.2
|
92.7
|
Noosa
|
42.0
|
40.3
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
98.1
|
1.9
|
91.3
|
Nudgee
|
75.1
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.5
|
3.5
|
93.7
|
Pumicestone
|
46.3
|
17.8
|
|
16.1
|
2.5
|
15.5
|
1.8
|
98.2
|
1.8
|
93.8
|
Redcliffe
|
56.6
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
16.5
|
97.6
|
2.4
|
92.9
|
Redlands
|
48.6
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
7.8
|
14.4
|
97.3
|
2.7
|
94.3
|
Robina
|
46.0
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.3
|
4.7
|
90.0
|
Rockhampton
|
69.1
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
93.4
|
Sandgate
|
66.8
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
97.7
|
2.3
|
94.1
|
South Brisbane
|
59.9
|
19.7
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
11.4
|
97.4
|
2.6
|
88.6
|
Southern Downs
|
25.5
|
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
22.9
|
98.3
|
1.7
|
93.7
|
Southport
|
50.9
|
|
29.1
|
15.2
|
|
|
4.9
|
97.6
|
2.4
|
90.2
|
Springwood
|
45.6
|
14.6
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
92.7
|
Stafford
|
65.4
|
24.2
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
97.7
|
2.3
|
93.3
|
Stretton
|
62.7
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
96.3
|
3.7
|
92.0
|
Surfers Paradise
|
38.3
|
|
49.7
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
96.9
|
3.1
|
88.2
|
Tablelands
|
24.8
|
|
16.4
|
36.0
|
|
|
22.8
|
98.6
|
1.4
|
92.8
|
Thuringowa
|
41.0
|
10.1
|
18.7
|
|
|
3.1
|
27.1
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
93.0
|
Toowoomba North
|
44.1
|
|
39.7
|
|
|
6.9
|
9.3
|
97.7
|
2.3
|
93.2
|
Toowoomba South
|
32.5
|
|
43.8
|
20.0
|
|
|
3.7
|
98.4
|
1.6
|
92.5
|
Townsville
|
52.0
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
96.8
|
3.2
|
89.5
|
Warrego
|
16.3
|
|
33.8
|
23.8
|
|
|
26.1
|
98.8
|
1.2
|
93.3
|
Waterford
|
56.2
|
14.8
|
|
24.8
|
|
|
4.1
|
97.2
|
2.8
|
91.3
|
Whitsunday
|
46.3
|
|
24.2
|
12.4
|
|
13.5
|
3.7
|
98.5
|
1.5
|
91.6
|
Woodridge
|
57.3
|
6.1
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
15.9
|
97.3
|
2.7
|
91.1
|
Yeerongpilly
|
61.8
|
21.3
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
9.2
|
97.8
|
2.2
|
92.2
|
Total
|
48.9
|
14.3
|
14.2
|
8.7
|
2.5
|
2.4
|
9.0
|
97.7
|
2.3
|
92.6
|
Regions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brisbane
|
57.9
|
22.5
|
2.4
|
3.3
|
4.1
|
1.1
|
8.7
|
97.6
|
2.4
|
92.9
|
Gold/Sunshine
Coasts
|
43.1
|
17.6
|
17.1
|
12.6
|
2.6
|
1.2
|
5.7
|
97.5
|
2.5
|
91.4
|
Regional/Rural
|
41.3
|
3.1
|
26.5
|
13.1
|
0.6
|
4.5
|
11.0
|
98.0
|
2.0
|
92.8
|
Table 3 Legislative Assembly:
District Detail
Albert
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 364
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Evans
|
ONP
|
5 438
|
23.8
|
Keech
|
ALP
|
11 551
|
50.6
|
Johanson
|
LP
|
3 092
|
13.6
|
McMullan
|
NP
|
2 725
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Evans
|
ONP
|
7 875
|
37.4
|
Keech
|
ALP
|
13 207
|
62.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 724
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 806
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
578
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
23 384
|
92.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Algester
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 796
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Struthers
|
ALP
|
15 709
|
66.7
|
Cole
|
LP
|
5 343
|
22.7
|
Lamb
|
CDP
|
919
|
3.9
|
Watt
|
IND
|
1 575
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Struthers
|
ALP
|
16 140
|
72.6
|
Cole
|
LP
|
6 082
|
27.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 324
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 546
|
97.4
|
Informal
|
|
632
|
2.6
|
Turnout
|
|
24 178
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashgrove
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 977
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Matthews
|
AD
|
1 300
|
5.3
|
Fouras
|
ALP
|
13 630
|
55.5
|
Anderson
|
IND
|
923
|
3.8
|
Carey-Smith
|
GRN
|
1 459
|
5.9
|
Cook
|
LP
|
7 263
|
29.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Fouras
|
ALP
|
15 068
|
65.0
|
Cook
|
LP
|
8 102
|
35.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 405
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 575
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
414
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
24 989
|
92.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspley
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 372
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Barry
|
ALP
|
13 150
|
54.7
|
Goss
|
LP
|
10 894
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 044
|
96.9
|
Informal
|
|
770
|
3.1
|
Turnout
|
|
24 814
|
94.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barron River
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 818
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Starr
|
ONP
|
3 587
|
16.2
|
Warwick
|
LP
|
3 588
|
16.2
|
Clark
|
ALP
|
9 511
|
43.0
|
Bonneau
|
IND
|
4 213
|
19.1
|
Walls
|
GRN
|
1 212
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Clark
|
ALP
|
10 759
|
57.3
|
Bonneau
|
IND
|
8 031
|
42.7
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 321
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 111
|
98.5
|
Informal
|
|
336
|
1.5
|
Turnout
|
|
22 447
|
90.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beaudesert
|
|
|
Enrolled 28 051
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Benson
|
ONP
|
7 680
|
29.5
|
Limburg
|
IND
|
1 166
|
4.5
|
Lingard
|
NP
|
8 297
|
31.9
|
Stephenson
|
ALP
|
8 868
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Lingard
|
NP
|
10 876
|
52.0
|
Stephenson
|
ALP
|
10 042
|
48.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
5 093
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
26 011
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
433
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
26 444
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brisbane Central
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 646
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Skyring
|
IND
|
127
|
0.6
|
Buckley
|
IND
|
112
|
0.5
|
Beattie
|
ALP
|
14 894
|
64.7
|
Wynter
|
IND
|
200
|
0.9
|
Dalton
|
IND
|
84
|
0.4
|
Tonite
|
IND
|
974
|
4.2
|
Tornatore
|
IND
|
201
|
0.9
|
Vasta
|
LP
|
4 839
|
21.0
|
Nielsen
|
GRN
|
1 579
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Beattie
|
ALP
|
15 936
|
75.0
|
Vasta
|
LP
|
5 322
|
25.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 752
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 010
|
98.1
|
Informal
|
|
441
|
1.9
|
Turnout
|
|
23 451
|
88.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broadwater
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 267
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Croft
|
ALP
|
12 388
|
52.4
|
Grice
|
NP
|
11 231
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 619
|
95.6
|
Informal
|
|
1 092
|
4.4
|
Turnout
|
|
24 711
|
90.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulimba
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 208
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Woollett
|
LP
|
5 960
|
26.8
|
Purcell
|
ALP
|
16 295
|
73.2
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 255
|
96.5
|
Informal
|
|
814
|
3.5
|
Turnout
|
|
23 069
|
91.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bundaberg
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 155
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Cunningham
|
ALP
|
15 812
|
64.9
|
Porter
|
NP
|
8 552
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 364
|
95.8
|
Informal
|
|
1 079
|
4.2
|
Turnout
|
|
25 443
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
Bundamba
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 897
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Miller
|
ALP
|
15 356
|
71.7
|
McLean
|
LP
|
3 196
|
14.9
|
McKeon
|
GRN
|
2 881
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Miller
|
ALP
|
16 043
|
80.9
|
McLean
|
LP
|
3 786
|
19.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 604
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 433
|
96.0
|
Informal
|
|
896
|
4.0
|
Turnout
|
|
22 329
|
93.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burdekin
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 291
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Knuth
|
CCA
|
4 439
|
20.9
|
Poletto
|
ONP
|
4 180
|
19.7
|
Rodgers
|
ALP
|
7 808
|
36.7
|
Morato
|
NP
|
4 836
|
22.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Rodgers
|
ALP
|
8 863
|
55.1
|
Morato
|
NP
|
7 215
|
44.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
5 185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 263
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
341
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
21 604
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burleigh
|
|
|
Enrolled 29 191
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Pepperell
|
ONP
|
4 385
|
17.0
|
Gamin
|
NP
|
10 020
|
38.8
|
Smith
|
ALP
|
11 445
|
44.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Gamin
|
NP
|
11 233
|
48.2
|
Smith
|
ALP
|
12 062
|
51.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 555
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 850
|
97.8
|
Informal
|
|
588
|
2.2
|
Turnout
|
|
26 438
|
90.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burnett
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 416
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Strong
|
ALP
|
11 169
|
51.7
|
Slack
|
NP
|
10 433
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 602
|
94.8
|
Informal
|
|
1 179
|
5.2
|
Turnout
|
|
22 781
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cairns
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 882
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Boyle
|
ALP
|
11 170
|
51.5
|
Wilson
|
NP
|
4 819
|
22.2
|
Hart
|
GRN
|
1 297
|
6.0
|
Gargan
|
ONP
|
4 394
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Boyle
|
ALP
|
12 400
|
64.8
|
Wilson
|
NP
|
6 730
|
35.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 550
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 680
|
98.1
|
Informal
|
|
419
|
1.9
|
Turnout
|
|
22 099
|
88.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callide
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 950
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Seeney
|
NP
|
9 598
|
40.1
|
Allen
|
ALP
|
5 694
|
23.8
|
Dwyer
|
ONP
|
8 648
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Seeney
|
NP
|
10 265
|
52.3
|
Dwyer
|
ONP
|
9 355
|
47.7
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 320
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 940
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
424
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
24 364
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caloundra
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 046
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Wilkinson
|
IND
|
1 430
|
6.0
|
Anthony
|
ALP
|
8 658
|
36.3
|
Tannock
|
ONP
|
4 555
|
19.1
|
Sheldon
|
LP
|
9 200
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Anthony
|
ALP
|
10 234
|
49.0
|
Sheldon
|
LP
|
10 637
|
51.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 972
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 843
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
423
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
24 266
|
93.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capalaba
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 328
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Elliott
|
IND
|
3 835
|
15.8
|
Choi
|
ALP
|
10 577
|
43.6
|
Reimers
|
IND
|
158
|
0.7
|
Bowler
|
IND
|
3 403
|
14.0
|
Brown
|
IND
|
272
|
1.1
|
O'Rourke
|
ONP
|
2 958
|
12.2
|
Costello
|
LP
|
3 051
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Choi
|
ALP
|
11 650
|
64.6
|
Bowler
|
IND
|
6 379
|
35.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
6 225
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 254
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
633
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
24 887
|
94.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charters Towers
|
|
|
Enrolled 18 645
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Mitchell
|
NP
|
5 984
|
34.6
|
Scott
|
ALP
|
7 575
|
43.8
|
Ree
|
ONP
|
3 745
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Mitchell
|
NP
|
7 460
|
47.8
|
Scott
|
ALP
|
8 138
|
52.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 706
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
17 304
|
99.1
|
Informal
|
|
165
|
0.9
|
Turnout
|
|
17 469
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chatsworth
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 566
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Echaubard
|
ONP
|
2 813
|
11.0
|
Wilson
|
GRN
|
1 389
|
5.4
|
Leu
|
LP
|
6 813
|
26.7
|
Mackenroth
|
ALP
|
14 530
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Leu
|
LP
|
8 322
|
34.9
|
Mackenroth
|
ALP
|
15 555
|
65.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 668
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 545
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
532
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
26 077
|
94.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clayfield
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 067
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Clark
|
ALP
|
10 839
|
45.9
|
Santoro
|
LP
|
9 948
|
42.2
|
Hegge
|
GRN
|
1 228
|
5.2
|
Brittan
|
IND
|
1 582
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Clark
|
ALP
|
11 593
|
52.0
|
Santoro
|
LP
|
10 708
|
48.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 296
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 597
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
394
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
23 991
|
92.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleveland
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 779
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Friis
|
LP
|
5 880
|
25.0
|
Briskey
|
ALP
|
13 529
|
57.6
|
Barton
|
IND
|
4 099
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Friis
|
LP
|
7 152
|
33.3
|
Briskey
|
ALP
|
14 300
|
66.7
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 056
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 508
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
613
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
24 121
|
93.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cook
|
|
|
Enrolled 19 587
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Webb
|
ONP
|
3 465
|
20.6
|
Hollingsworth
|
NP
|
2 610
|
15.5
|
Bredhaurer
|
ALP
|
10 727
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Webb
|
ONP
|
4 162
|
27.1
|
Bredhaurer
|
ALP
|
11 175
|
72.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 465
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
16 802
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
282
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
17 084
|
87.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cunningham
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 787
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Collins
|
IND
|
2 834
|
12.5
|
Drinan
|
ONP
|
4 700
|
20.7
|
King
|
ALP
|
5 686
|
25.0
|
Copeland
|
NP
|
5 661
|
24.9
|
Reynolds
|
CCA
|
502
|
2.2
|
Rookas
|
LP
|
3 368
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
King
|
ALP
|
6 893
|
41.4
|
Copeland
|
NP
|
9 769
|
58.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
6 089
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 751
|
98.7
|
Informal
|
|
301
|
1.3
|
Turnout
|
|
23 052
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currumbin
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 294
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Rose
|
ALP
|
13 801
|
56.4
|
Stuckey
|
LP
|
6 251
|
25.6
|
Horsburgh
|
ONP
|
3 823
|
15.6
|
Rossini
|
IND
|
590
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Rose
|
ALP
|
14 581
|
64.5
|
Stuckey
|
LP
|
8 009
|
35.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 465
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
421
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
24 886
|
91.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darling Downs
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 272
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Martin
|
ALP
|
4 749
|
20.9
|
Taylor
|
NP
|
8 855
|
39.1
|
Hopper
|
IND
|
9 069
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Taylor
|
NP
|
9 226
|
48.9
|
Hopper
|
IND
|
9 651
|
51.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 673
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
400
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
23 073
|
95.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Everton
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 058
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Edwards
|
CCA
|
2 302
|
9.2
|
Dangerfield
|
LP
|
6 990
|
27.9
|
Welford
|
ALP
|
15 719
|
62.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Dangerfield
|
LP
|
7 749
|
32.5
|
Welford
|
ALP
|
16 063
|
67.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 199
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 011
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
517
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
25 528
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ferny Grove
|
|
|
Enrolled 28 114
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Eaton
|
LP
|
6 756
|
26.0
|
Stasse
|
GRN
|
2 774
|
10.7
|
Wilson
|
ALP
|
16 466
|
63.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Eaton
|
LP
|
7 302
|
29.5
|
Wilson
|
ALP
|
17 488
|
70.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 206
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 996
|
97.7
|
Informal
|
|
599
|
2.3
|
Turnout
|
|
26 595
|
94.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fitzroy
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 457
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Schuback
|
CCA
|
1 879
|
8.7
|
Pearce
|
ALP
|
13 599
|
62.8
|
Lawrie
|
NP
|
6 187
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Pearce
|
ALP
|
13 915
|
67.2
|
Lawrie
|
NP
|
6 797
|
32.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 665
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
351
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
22 016
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gaven
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 357
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Spain
|
GRN
|
1 839
|
8.6
|
Poole
|
ALP
|
9 969
|
46.4
|
Connolly
|
IND
|
1 883
|
8.8
|
Cassidy
|
IND
|
596
|
2.8
|
Baumann
|
NP
|
7 178
|
33.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Poole
|
ALP
|
10 776
|
57.6
|
Baumann
|
NP
|
7 933
|
42.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 756
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 465
|
96.6
|
Informal
|
|
767
|
3.4
|
Turnout
|
|
22 232
|
91.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gladstone
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 088
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Warren
|
GRN
|
450
|
1.8
|
Cunningham
|
IND
|
12 336
|
50.7
|
Ellingsen
|
ALP
|
10 992
|
45.1
|
Hamann
|
NP
|
571
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Cunningham
|
IND
|
12 772
|
53.5
|
Ellingsen
|
ALP
|
11 103
|
46.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 349
|
98.8
|
Informal
|
|
285
|
1.2
|
Turnout
|
|
24 634
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glass House
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 683
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Chippendale
|
NP
|
4 408
|
18.0
|
Ferraro
|
ONP
|
4 993
|
20.4
|
Janke
|
CCA
|
867
|
3.5
|
Cannon
|
GRN
|
1 628
|
6.6
|
Male
|
ALP
|
9 989
|
40.8
|
Taylor
|
LP
|
2 612
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Chippendale
|
NP
|
7 869
|
40.4
|
Male
|
ALP
|
11 598
|
59.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
5 030
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 497
|
98.2
|
Informal
|
|
439
|
1.8
|
Turnout
|
|
24 936
|
93.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenslopes
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 320
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Fenlon
|
ALP
|
13 744
|
55.4
|
Edwards
|
LP
|
7 639
|
30.8
|
Whitney
|
CCA
|
915
|
3.7
|
Curley
|
GRN
|
2 491
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Fenlon
|
ALP
|
14 791
|
64.1
|
Edwards
|
LP
|
8 289
|
35.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 709
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 789
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
498
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
25 287
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
|
|
|
Enrolled 18 723
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
McDonell
|
ALP
|
6 897
|
40.7
|
Johnson
|
NP
|
10 047
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
16 944
|
97.3
|
Informal
|
|
476
|
2.7
|
Turnout
|
|
17 420
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gympie
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 757
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Gate
|
ALP
|
8 563
|
33.4
|
Petersen
|
CCA
|
4 139
|
16.2
|
Roberts
|
ONP
|
6 587
|
25.7
|
Duff
|
NP
|
6 330
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Gate
|
ALP
|
9 766
|
46.7
|
Roberts
|
ONP
|
11 130
|
53.3
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 723
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 619
|
98.5
|
Informal
|
|
399
|
1.5
|
Turnout
|
|
26 018
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hervey Bay
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 613
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Robinson
|
ONP
|
4 186
|
18.4
|
McLellan
|
NP
|
3 915
|
17.2
|
Donnelly
|
IND
|
723
|
3.2
|
Dalgleish
|
CCA
|
4 193
|
18.5
|
McNamara
|
ALP
|
9 707
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Robinson
|
ONP
|
7 762
|
42.4
|
McNamara
|
ALP
|
10 559
|
57.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 403
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 724
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
379
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
23 103
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hinchinbrook
|
|
|
Enrolled 22 236
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Steley
|
CCA
|
270
|
1.3
|
Lancini
|
IND
|
3 534
|
17.4
|
Rowell
|
NP
|
5 862
|
28.8
|
Small
|
ALP
|
5 313
|
26.1
|
Ralph
|
ONP
|
5 362
|
26.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Rowell
|
NP
|
7 192
|
52.8
|
Ralph
|
ONP
|
6 436
|
47.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
6 713
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
20 341
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
362
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
20 703
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inala
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 269
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Palaszczuk
|
ALP
|
14 434
|
68.1
|
Pugh
|
IND
|
4 585
|
21.6
|
Jackson
|
LP
|
2 180
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Palaszczuk
|
ALP
|
14 606
|
52.8
|
Pugh
|
IND
|
5 836
|
47.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 199
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
551
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
21 750
|
93.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indooroopilly
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 105
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Sakzewski
|
IND
|
997
|
4.3
|
Lee
|
ALP
|
9 028
|
38.7
|
Hutton
|
GRN
|
2 351
|
10.1
|
Freemarijuana
|
IND
|
434
|
1.9
|
Drew
|
ONP
|
879
|
3.8
|
Beanland
|
LP
|
8 686
|
37.2
|
McIntyre
|
AD
|
944
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Lee
|
ALP
|
11 245
|
52.9
|
Beanland
|
LP
|
10 022
|
47.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 319
|
98.9
|
Informal
|
|
260
|
1.1
|
Turnout
|
|
23 579
|
90.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ipswich
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 593
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Jaenke
|
IND
|
1 303
|
5.3
|
Nolan
|
ALP
|
12 282
|
49.8
|
Nardi
|
IND
|
2 200
|
8.9
|
Mahoney
|
GRN
|
642
|
2.6
|
Cameron
|
IND
|
107
|
0.4
|
Atkin
|
CCA
|
243
|
1.0
|
Magnussen
|
ONP
|
5 237
|
21.2
|
Forbes
|
LP
|
2 641
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Nolan
|
ALP
|
14 029
|
66.8
|
Magnussen
|
ONP
|
6 985
|
33.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 641
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 655
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
410
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
25 065
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
Ipswich West
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 180
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Dutton
|
ONP
|
6 002
|
25.6
|
Livingstone
|
ALP
|
10 768
|
45.9
|
Glass
|
GRN
|
1 016
|
4.3
|
Paff
|
CCA
|
1 200
|
5.1
|
Pahlke
|
NP
|
4 469
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Dutton
|
ONP
|
8 679
|
42.7
|
Livingstone
|
ALP
|
11 645
|
57.3
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 131
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 455
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
390
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
23 845
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kallangur
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 045
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Hayward
|
ALP
|
13 312
|
58.3
|
Eldridge
|
CCA
|
1 740
|
7.6
|
Tooke
|
GRN
|
1 656
|
7.3
|
Jones
|
IND
|
1 750
|
7.7
|
Driscoll
|
LP
|
4 366
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Hayward
|
ALP
|
14 165
|
71.4
|
Driscoll
|
LP
|
5 681
|
28.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 978
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 824
|
97.3
|
Informal
|
|
642
|
2.7
|
Turnout
|
|
23 466
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kawana
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 943
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Savage
|
ONP
|
4 708
|
19.1
|
Cummins
|
ALP
|
10 446
|
42.5
|
Laming
|
LP
|
9 438
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Cummins
|
ALP
|
11 801
|
52.6
|
Laming
|
LP
|
10 625
|
47.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 592
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
496
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
25 088
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keppel
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 668
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Mather
|
CCA
|
3 030
|
14.0
|
Hoolihan
|
ALP
|
9 281
|
43.0
|
Lester
|
NP
|
9 285
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Hoolihan
|
ALP
|
9 620
|
48.5
|
Lester
|
NP
|
10 198
|
51.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 596
|
98.2
|
Informal
|
|
404
|
1.8
|
Turnout
|
|
22 000
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kurwongbah
|
|
|
Enrolled 29 147
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Pantano
|
GRN
|
1 762
|
6.6
|
Harrison
|
AD
|
1 460
|
5.4
|
Lavarch
|
ALP
|
16 889
|
62.9
|
Purtill
|
CCA
|
963
|
3.6
|
Martin
|
LP
|
5 757
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Lavarch
|
ALP
|
17 987
|
72.7
|
Martin
|
LP
|
6 755
|
27.3
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 089
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
26 831
|
97.6
|
Informal
|
|
663
|
2.4
|
Turnout
|
|
27 494
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lockyer
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 189
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Micallef
|
IND
|
325
|
1.4
|
Clarke
|
ALP
|
6 428
|
27.5
|
Christensen
|
NP
|
3 947
|
16.9
|
Nemeth
|
GRN
|
665
|
2.8
|
Prenzler
|
CCA
|
4 197
|
18.0
|
Murray
|
IND
|
1 170
|
5.0
|
Flynn
|
ONP
|
6 608
|
28.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Clarke
|
ALP
|
7 533
|
42.7
|
Flynn
|
ONP
|
10 108
|
57.3
|
Exhausted
|
|
5 699
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 340
|
98.2
|
Informal
|
|
434
|
1.8
|
Turnout
|
|
23 774
|
94.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logan
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 752
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Drescher
|
NP
|
6 001
|
27.7
|
Mickel
|
ALP
|
15 645
|
72.3
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 646
|
94.4
|
Informal
|
|
1 275
|
5.6
|
Turnout
|
|
22 921
|
92.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lytton
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 483
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Lucas
|
ALP
|
16 305
|
66.9
|
Smith
|
GRN
|
2 736
|
11.2
|
Ladner
|
LP
|
5 329
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Lucas
|
ALP
|
17 150
|
74.4
|
Ladner
|
LP
|
5 902
|
25.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 318
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 370
|
97.2
|
Informal
|
|
697
|
2.8
|
Turnout
|
|
25 067
|
94.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mackay
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 063
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Townsend
|
CCA
|
2 433
|
10.0
|
Bella
|
NP
|
7 594
|
31.3
|
Mulherin
|
ALP
|
14 235
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Bella
|
NP
|
8 323
|
36.5
|
Mulherin
|
ALP
|
14 494
|
63.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 445
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 262
|
97.7
|
Informal
|
|
580
|
2.3
|
Turnout
|
|
24 842
|
91.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mansfield
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 018
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Leworthy
|
IND
|
2 960
|
11.9
|
Carroll
|
LP
|
8 646
|
34.7
|
Reeves
|
ALP
|
13 296
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Carroll
|
LP
|
9 746
|
41.4
|
Reeves
|
ALP
|
13 806
|
58.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 902
|
98.2
|
Informal
|
|
463
|
1.8
|
Turnout
|
|
25 365
|
93.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maroochydore
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 914
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Baillie
|
ALP
|
9 762
|
41.1
|
Simpson
|
NP
|
9 446
|
39.8
|
Wellard
|
ONP
|
4 530
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Baillie
|
ALP
|
10 318
|
49.2
|
Simpson
|
NP
|
10 650
|
50.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 770
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 738
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
492
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
24 230
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryborough
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 833
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Smith
|
IND
|
545
|
2.3
|
Douglas
|
CCA
|
1 844
|
7.7
|
Holmes
|
ALP
|
10 081
|
42.0
|
Kingston
|
IND
|
8 034
|
33.5
|
Harris
|
NP
|
3 492
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Holmes
|
ALP
|
10 466
|
49.5
|
Kingston
|
IND
|
10 678
|
50.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 852
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 996
|
97.6
|
Informal
|
|
582
|
2.4
|
Turnout
|
|
24 578
|
95.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirani
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 623
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Staker
|
ALP
|
7 296
|
33.2
|
Gomersall
|
IND
|
1 546
|
7.0
|
Vaughan
|
IND
|
729
|
3.3
|
Malone
|
NP
|
7 672
|
34.9
|
Robinson
|
ONP
|
4 729
|
21.5
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Staker
|
ALP
|
8 042
|
46.2
|
Malone
|
NP
|
9 366
|
53.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 972
|
98.6
|
Informal
|
|
303
|
1.4
|
Turnout
|
|
22 275
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moggill
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 733
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Searle
|
IND
|
2 263
|
9.3
|
Watson
|
LP
|
9 872
|
40.4
|
Lumsden
|
ALP
|
9 408
|
38.5
|
Yesberg
|
AD
|
1 355
|
5.5
|
Taylor
|
GRN
|
1 566
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Watson
|
LP
|
11 404
|
50.9
|
Lumsden
|
ALP
|
11 008
|
49.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 052
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 464
|
98.5
|
Informal
|
|
373
|
1.5
|
Turnout
|
|
24 837
|
92.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount Coot-tha
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 343
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Zaborszzky
|
AD
|
985
|
4.3
|
Boccabella
|
IND
|
1 424
|
6.2
|
Edmund
|
ALP
|
11 741
|
51.0
|
Copeman
|
GRN
|
2 740
|
11.9
|
Cannon
|
LP
|
6 135
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Edmund
|
ALP
|
13 888
|
66.1
|
Cannon
|
LP
|
7 116
|
33.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 021
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 025
|
98.5
|
Informal
|
|
348
|
1.5
|
Turnout
|
|
23 373
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount Gravatt
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 271
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Spence
|
ALP
|
13 187
|
54.6
|
Eggmolesse
|
IND
|
235
|
1.0
|
Huang
|
LP
|
6 509
|
27.0
|
McMahon
|
ONP
|
2 248
|
9.3
|
Tanti
|
IND
|
831
|
3.4
|
Lloyd
|
GRN
|
1 141
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Spence
|
ALP
|
14 220
|
64.2
|
Huang
|
LP
|
7 940
|
35.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 991
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 151
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
490
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
24 641
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount Isa
|
|
|
Enrolled 17 811
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
McGrady
|
ALP
|
8 981
|
57.6
|
Braden
|
ONP
|
3 384
|
21.7
|
Clarke
|
NP
|
3 220
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
McGrady
|
ALP
|
9 593
|
66.2
|
Clarke
|
NP
|
4 892
|
33.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
15 585
|
98.6
|
Informal
|
|
216
|
1.4
|
Turnout
|
|
15 801
|
88.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mount Ommaney
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 213
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Bertoni
|
IND
|
5 657
|
23.6
|
Bach
|
GRN
|
1 141
|
4.8
|
Attwood
|
ALP
|
12 483
|
52.0
|
Harper
|
LP
|
4 731
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Attwood
|
ALP
|
13 273
|
58.7
|
Harper
|
LP
|
9 323
|
41.3
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 416
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 012
|
98.7
|
Informal
|
|
322
|
1.3
|
Turnout
|
|
24 334
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mudgeeraba
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 732
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Keys
|
IND
|
3 596
|
15.9
|
Light
|
GRN
|
2 025
|
8.9
|
Connor
|
LP
|
6 952
|
30.6
|
Bradley
|
IND
|
330
|
1.5
|
Lyons
|
IND
|
408
|
1.8
|
Reilly
|
ALP
|
9 371
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Connor
|
LP
|
8 060
|
38.6
|
Reilly
|
ALP
|
10 585
|
61.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 037
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 682
|
96.8
|
Informal
|
|
750
|
3.2
|
Turnout
|
|
23 432
|
91.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mulgrave
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 503
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Moyle
|
NP
|
4 443
|
20.0
|
Pitt
|
ALP
|
11 903
|
53.6
|
Frisone
|
ONP
|
5 847
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Pitt
|
ALP
|
12 512
|
61.3
|
Frisone
|
ONP
|
7 903
|
38.7
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 193
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
383
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
22 576
|
92.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mundingburra
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 566
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Moore
|
LP
|
6 780
|
28.5
|
Nelson-Carr
|
ALP
|
11 640
|
48.9
|
Elson
|
ONP
|
4 056
|
17.0
|
Staines
|
CCA
|
439
|
1.8
|
Smith
|
GRN
|
904
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Moore
|
LP
|
7 928
|
38.6
|
Nelson-Carr
|
ALP
|
12 598
|
61.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 293
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 819
|
98.0
|
Informal
|
|
484
|
2.0
|
Turnout
|
|
24 303
|
91.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murrumba
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 882
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
McJannett
|
IND
|
4 408
|
18.6
|
Haskell
|
LP
|
4 498
|
18.9
|
Wells
|
ALP
|
14 839
|
62.5
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Haskell
|
LP
|
6 295
|
28.9
|
Wells
|
ALP
|
15 500
|
71.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 745
|
97.4
|
Informal
|
|
635
|
2.6
|
Turnout
|
|
24 380
|
94.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nanango
|
|
|
Enrolled 22 710
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Campbell
|
NP
|
5 400
|
25.8
|
Weir
|
ALP
|
5 882
|
28.1
|
Pratt
|
IND
|
9 680
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Weir
|
ALP
|
6 282
|
32.9
|
Pratt
|
IND
|
12 796
|
67.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 884
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
20 962
|
97.9
|
Informal
|
|
451
|
2.1
|
Turnout
|
|
21 413
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nicklin
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 249
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Fitzgerald
|
GRN
|
932
|
3.7
|
Booth
|
ONP
|
3 992
|
16.0
|
Boman
|
ALP
|
4 224
|
16.9
|
Wellington
|
IND
|
11 554
|
46.3
|
Gardiner
|
NP
|
1 941
|
7.8
|
Whittington
|
LP
|
2 305
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Booth
|
ONP
|
5 469
|
26.6
|
Wellington
|
IND
|
15 114
|
73.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 365
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 948
|
98.8
|
Informal
|
|
304
|
1.2
|
Turnout
|
|
25 252
|
92.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noosa
|
|
|
Enrolled 28 739
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Davidson
|
LP
|
10 391
|
40.3
|
Lake
|
ONP
|
4 543
|
17.6
|
Molloy
|
ALP
|
10 828
|
42.0
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Davidson
|
LP
|
11 552
|
49.1
|
Molloy
|
ALP
|
11 977
|
50.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 233
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 762
|
98.1
|
Informal
|
|
486
|
1.9
|
Turnout
|
|
26 248
|
91.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nudgee
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 860
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Taylor
|
LP
|
6 042
|
24.9
|
Roberts
|
ALP
|
18 252
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 294
|
96.5
|
Informal
|
|
882
|
3.5
|
Turnout
|
|
25 176
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pumicestone
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 648
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Feldman
|
CCA
|
3 805
|
15.5
|
Sullivan
|
ALP
|
11 360
|
46.3
|
Rounsefell
|
IND
|
453
|
1.8
|
Whitney
|
ONP
|
3 953
|
16.1
|
Shotton
|
GRN
|
610
|
2.5
|
Parsons
|
LP
|
4 380
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Sullivan
|
ALP
|
12 686
|
66.1
|
Parsons
|
LP
|
6 505
|
33.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
5 370
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 561
|
98.2
|
Informal
|
|
439
|
1.8
|
Turnout
|
|
25 000
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redcliffe
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 292
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Salisbury
|
CCA
|
866
|
3.5
|
Frawley
|
IND
|
3 232
|
13.1
|
Rankin
|
LP
|
5 789
|
23.4
|
Hollis
|
ALP
|
13 989
|
56.6
|
Matthews
|
IND
|
255
|
1.0
|
White
|
IND
|
604
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Rankin
|
LP
|
7 011
|
32.4
|
Hollis
|
ALP
|
14 633
|
67.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 091
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 735
|
97.6
|
Informal
|
|
606
|
2.4
|
Turnout
|
|
25 341
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redlands
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 229
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
English
|
ALP
|
10 797
|
48.6
|
Burns
|
IND
|
3 210
|
14.4
|
Hegarty
|
NP
|
6 500
|
29.2
|
Hancock
|
CCA
|
1 731
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
English
|
ALP
|
11 494
|
56.9
|
Hegarty
|
NP
|
8 721
|
43.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 238
|
97.3
|
Informal
|
|
611
|
2.7
|
Turnout
|
|
22 849
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robina
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 655
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Simmonds
|
ALP
|
10 909
|
46.0
|
Quinn
|
LP
|
12 822
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 731
|
95.3
|
Informal
|
|
1 171
|
4.7
|
Turnout
|
|
24 902
|
90.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockhampton
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 306
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Schuback
|
CCA
|
2 056
|
8.9
|
Bahnisch
|
NP
|
5 053
|
21.9
|
Schwarten
|
ALP
|
15 926
|
69.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Bahnisch
|
NP
|
5 626
|
25.8
|
Schwarten
|
ALP
|
16 166
|
74.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 243
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 035
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
592
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
23 627
|
93.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandgate
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 426
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Nuttall
|
ALP
|
16 242
|
66.8
|
Young
|
LP
|
4 890
|
20.1
|
Eaton
|
IND
|
3 179
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Nuttall
|
ALP
|
16 774
|
74.5
|
Young
|
LP
|
5 750
|
25.5
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 787
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 311
|
97.7
|
Informal
|
|
565
|
2.3
|
Turnout
|
|
24 876
|
94.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Brisbane
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 729
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Chappel
|
LP
|
4 720
|
19.7
|
Swan
|
IND
|
777
|
3.2
|
Bligh
|
ALP
|
14 329
|
59.9
|
Baker
|
IND
|
310
|
1.3
|
Freemarijuana
|
IND
|
653
|
2.7
|
Taylor
|
GRN
|
2 150
|
9.0
|
Lagos
|
AD
|
985
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Chappel
|
LP
|
5 479
|
25.0
|
Bligh
|
ALP
|
16 377
|
75.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 068
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 924
|
97.4
|
Informal
|
|
638
|
2.6
|
Turnout
|
|
24 562
|
88.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern Downs
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 551
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
White
|
IND
|
5 818
|
22.9
|
Rey
|
ALP
|
6 459
|
25.5
|
Springborg
|
NP
|
13 092
|
51.6
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Rey
|
ALP
|
7 278
|
33.2
|
Springborg
|
NP
|
14 627
|
66.8
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 464
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
25 369
|
98.3
|
Informal
|
|
451
|
1.7
|
Turnout
|
|
25 820
|
93.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southport
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 127
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Lawlor
|
ALP
|
11 245
|
50.9
|
Millar
|
ONP
|
3 351
|
15.2
|
Veivers
|
NP
|
6 434
|
29.1
|
Cortenbach
|
IND
|
1 083
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Lawlor
|
ALP
|
11 986
|
60.8
|
Veivers
|
NP
|
7 714
|
39.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 413
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 113
|
97.6
|
Informal
|
|
551
|
2.4
|
Turnout
|
|
22 664
|
90.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Springwood
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 138
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Johnston
|
IND
|
5 140
|
20.9
|
Stone
|
ALP
|
11 192
|
45.6
|
Ward
|
LP
|
3 590
|
14.6
|
Power
|
NP
|
4 613
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Stone
|
ALP
|
12 442
|
60.4
|
Power
|
NP
|
8 169
|
39.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 924
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 535
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
624
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
25 159
|
92.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stafford
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 169
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Belcher
|
LP
|
5 982
|
24.2
|
Sullivan
|
ALP
|
16 190
|
65.4
|
Meehan
|
GRN
|
2 590
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Belcher
|
LP
|
6 503
|
27.6
|
Sullivan
|
ALP
|
17 052
|
72.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 207
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 762
|
97.7
|
Informal
|
|
591
|
2.3
|
Turnout
|
|
25 353
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stretton
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 604
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Robertson
|
ALP
|
14 778
|
62.7
|
Lin
|
LP
|
8 805
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
23 583
|
96.3
|
Informal
|
|
894
|
3.7
|
Turnout
|
|
24 477
|
92.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surfers Paradise
|
|
|
Enrolled 28 321
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Hepburn
|
GRN
|
2 899
|
12.0
|
Alcorn
|
ALP
|
9 259
|
38.3
|
Borbidge
|
NP
|
12 033
|
49.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Alcorn
|
ALP
|
10 147
|
44.7
|
Borbidge
|
NP
|
12 546
|
55.3
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 498
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 191
|
96.9
|
Informal
|
|
784
|
3.1
|
Turnout
|
|
24 975
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tablelands
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 448
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Nelson
|
IND
|
3 284
|
15.3
|
Moro
|
NP
|
3 522
|
16.4
|
Condon
|
IND
|
1 098
|
5.1
|
Lee Long
|
ONP
|
7 722
|
36.0
|
Isherwood
|
IND
|
507
|
2.4
|
Yates
|
ALP
|
5 325
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Lee Long
|
ONP
|
10 994
|
63.8
|
Yates
|
ALP
|
6 235
|
36.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 458
|
98.6
|
Informal
|
|
313
|
1.4
|
Turnout
|
|
21 771
|
92.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thuringowa
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 763
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Nelson
|
LP
|
2 447
|
10.1
|
Weekes
|
NP
|
4 532
|
18.7
|
Morton
|
CCA
|
762
|
3.1
|
Turner
|
IND
|
6 258
|
25.8
|
Linder
|
IND
|
311
|
1.3
|
Phillips
|
ALP
|
9 952
|
41.0
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Phillips
|
ALP
|
11 052
|
53.6
|
Turner
|
IND
|
9 581
|
46.4
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 629
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 262
|
97.5
|
Informal
|
|
633
|
2.5
|
Turnout
|
|
24 895
|
93.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toowoomba North
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 335
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Shine
|
ALP
|
9 772
|
44.1
|
Berry
|
IND
|
1 215
|
5.5
|
Francis
|
CCA
|
1 529
|
6.9
|
Healy
|
NP
|
8 795
|
39.7
|
Mogg
|
IND
|
846
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Shine
|
ALP
|
10 503
|
51.9
|
Healy
|
NP
|
9 747
|
48.1
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 907
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 157
|
97.7
|
Informal
|
|
527
|
2.3
|
Turnout
|
|
22 684
|
93.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toowoomba South
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 152
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Shooter
|
ALP
|
7 439
|
32.5
|
Hoy
|
ONP
|
4 577
|
20.0
|
Horan
|
NP
|
10 028
|
43.8
|
Wilson
|
IND
|
857
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Shooter
|
ALP
|
8 216
|
42.1
|
Horan
|
NP
|
11 319
|
57.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 366
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 901
|
98.4
|
Informal
|
|
374
|
1.6
|
Turnout
|
|
23 275
|
92.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Townsville
|
|
|
Enrolled 25 513
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Reynolds
|
ALP
|
11 494
|
52.0
|
Tubman
|
IND
|
1 833
|
8.3
|
Tait
|
IND
|
942
|
4.3
|
Barker
|
LP
|
7 848
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Reynolds
|
ALP
|
12 319
|
59.3
|
Barker
|
LP
|
8 443
|
40.7
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 355
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 117
|
96.8
|
Informal
|
|
725
|
3.2
|
Turnout
|
|
22 842
|
89.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrego
|
|
|
Enrolled 21 600
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Hobbs
|
NP
|
6 737
|
33.8
|
Burton
|
ONP
|
4 733
|
23.8
|
Gleeson
|
IND
|
5 193
|
26.1
|
Chisholm
|
ALP
|
3 243
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Hobbs
|
NP
|
7 943
|
50.3
|
Gleeson
|
IND
|
7 847
|
49.7
|
Exhausted
|
|
4 116
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
19 906
|
98.8
|
Informal
|
|
239
|
1.2
|
Turnout
|
|
20 145
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waterford
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 793
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Somers
|
LP
|
3 267
|
14.8
|
Howse
|
IND
|
910
|
4.1
|
Barton
|
ALP
|
12 378
|
56.2
|
Woodward
|
ONP
|
5 465
|
24.8
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Barton
|
ALP
|
13 755
|
68.0
|
Woodward
|
ONP
|
6 470
|
32.0
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 795
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 020
|
97.2
|
Informal
|
|
625
|
2.8
|
Turnout
|
|
22 645
|
91.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whitsunday
|
|
|
Enrolled 24 015
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Smyth
|
IND
|
799
|
3.7
|
Haselgrove
|
ONP
|
2 677
|
12.4
|
Black
|
CCA
|
2 919
|
13.5
|
Perkins
|
NP
|
5 237
|
24.2
|
Jarratt
|
ALP
|
10 026
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Perkins
|
NP
|
7 294
|
40.4
|
Jarratt
|
ALP
|
10 751
|
59.6
|
Exhausted
|
|
3 613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
21 658
|
98.5
|
Informal
|
|
334
|
1.5
|
Turnout
|
|
21 992
|
91.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodridge
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 605
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Scott
|
ALP
|
11 992
|
57.3
|
Moore
|
IND
|
1 057
|
5.1
|
Grant
|
IND
|
2 273
|
10.9
|
Simon
|
LP
|
1 272
|
6.1
|
Ngahooro
|
ONP
|
4 336
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Scott
|
ALP
|
13 138
|
71.1
|
Ngahooro
|
ONP
|
5 346
|
28.9
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 446
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
20 930
|
97.3
|
Informal
|
|
579
|
2.7
|
Turnout
|
|
21 509
|
91.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeerongpilly
|
|
|
Enrolled 27 130
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
Burchall
|
GRN
|
1 877
|
7.7
|
Miles
|
LP
|
5 215
|
21.3
|
Wheeley
|
IND
|
731
|
3.0
|
Foley
|
ALP
|
15 135
|
61.8
|
Bond
|
IND
|
1 516
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
Miles
|
LP
|
6 249
|
27.8
|
Foley
|
ALP
|
16 210
|
72.2
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
24 474
|
97.8
|
Informal
|
|
545
|
2.2
|
Turnout
|
|
25 019
|
92.2
|
Table 4 Legislative Assembly: Two
Candidate Preferred Vote
District
|
ALP
|
LP/NP
|
ONP
|
Others
|
Exhausted (a)
|
No
|
%
|
No
|
%
|
No
|
%
|
No
|
%
|
No
|
%
|
Albert
|
13 207
|
62.6
|
|
|
7 875
|
37.4
|
|
|
1 724
|
7.6
|
Algester
|
16 140
|
72.6
|
6 082
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
|
1 324
|
5.6
|
Ashgrove
|
15 068
|
65.0
|
8 102
|
35.0
|
|
|
|
|
1 405
|
5.7
|
Aspley
|
13 150
|
54.7
|
10 894
|
45.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barron River
|
10 759
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
|
8 031
|
42.7
|
3 321
|
15.0
|
Beaudesert
|
10 042
|
48.0
|
10 876
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
|
5 093
|
19.6
|
Brisbane Central
|
15 936
|
75.0
|
5 322
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
|
1 752
|
7.6
|
Broadwater
|
12 388
|
52.4
|
11 231
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bulimba
|
16 295
|
73.2
|
5 960
|
26.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bundaberg
|
15 812
|
64.9
|
8 552
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bundamba
|
16 043
|
80.9
|
3 786
|
19.1
|
|
|
|
|
1 604
|
7.5
|
Burdekin
|
8 863
|
55.1
|
7 215
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
|
5 185
|
24.4
|
Burleigh
|
12 062
|
51.8
|
11 233
|
48.2
|
|
|
|
|
2 555
|
9.9
|
Burnett
|
11 169
|
51.7
|
10 433
|
48.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cairns
|
12 400
|
64.8
|
6 730
|
35.2
|
|
|
|
|
2 550
|
11.8
|
Callide
|
|
|
10 265
|
52.3
|
|
|
9 355
|
47.7
|
4 320
|
18.0
|
Caloundra
|
10 234
|
49.0
|
10 637
|
51.0
|
|
|
|
|
2 972
|
12.5
|
Capalaba
|
11 650
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
|
6 379
|
35.4
|
6 225
|
25.7
|
Charters Towers
|
8 138
|
52.2
|
7 460
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chatsworth
|
15 555
|
65.1
|
8 322
|
34.9
|
|
|
|
|
1 668
|
6.5
|
Clayfield
|
11 593
|
52.0
|
10 708
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
|
1 296
|
5.5
|
Cleveland
|
14 300
|
66.7
|
7 152
|
33.3
|
|
|
|
|
2 056
|
8.7
|
Cook
|
11 175
|
72.9
|
|
|
4 162
|
27.1
|
|
|
1 465
|
8.7
|
Cunningham
|
6 893
|
41.4
|
9 769
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currumbin
|
14 581
|
64.5
|
8 009
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
|
1 875
|
7.7
|
Darling Downs
|
|
|
9 226
|
48.9
|
|
|
9 651
|
51.1
|
3 796
|
16.7
|
Everton
|
16 063
|
67.5
|
7 749
|
32.5
|
|
|
|
|
1 199
|
4.8
|
Ferny Grove
|
17 488
|
70.5
|
7 302
|
29.5
|
|
|
|
|
1 206
|
4.6
|
Fitzroy
|
13 915
|
67.2
|
6 797
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
|
953
|
4.4
|
Gaven
|
10 776
|
57.6
|
7 933
|
42.4
|
|
|
|
|
2 756
|
12.8
|
Gladstone
|
11 103
|
46.5
|
|
|
|
|
12 772
|
53.5
|
474
|
1.9
|
Glass House
|
11 598
|
59.6
|
7 869
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
|
5 030
|
20.5
|
Greenslopes
|
14 791
|
64.1
|
8 289
|
35.9
|
|
|
|
|
1 709
|
6.9
|
Gregory
|
6 897
|
40.7
|
10 047
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gympie
|
9 766
|
46.7
|
|
|
11 130
|
53.3
|
|
|
4 723
|
18.4
|
Hervey Bay
|
10 559
|
57.6
|
|
|
7 762
|
42.4
|
|
|
4 403
|
19.4
|
Hinchinbrook
|
|
|
7 192
|
52.8
|
6 436
|
47.2
|
|
|
6 713
|
33.0
|
Inala
|
14 606
|
71.5
|
|
|
|
|
5 836
|
28.5
|
757
|
3.6
|
Indooroopilly
|
11 245
|
52.9
|
10 022
|
47.1
|
|
|
|
|
2 052
|
8.8
|
Ipswich
|
14 029
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
|
6 985
|
33.2
|
3 641
|
14.8
|
Ipswich West
|
11 645
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
|
8 679
|
42.7
|
3 131
|
13.3
|
Kallangur
|
14 165
|
71.4
|
5 681
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
|
2 978
|
13.0
|
Kawana
|
11 801
|
52.6
|
10 625
|
47.4
|
|
|
|
|
2 166
|
8.8
|
Keppel
|
9 620
|
48.5
|
10 198
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
1 778
|
8.2
|
Kurwongbah
|
17 987
|
72.7
|
6 755
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
|
2 089
|
7.8
|
Lockyer
|
7 533
|
42.7
|
|
|
10 108
|
57.3
|
|
|
5 699
|
24.4
|
Logan
|
15 645
|
72.3
|
6 001
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lytton
|
17 150
|
74.4
|
5 902
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
|
1 318
|
5.4
|
Mackay
|
14 494
|
63.5
|
8 323
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
|
1 445
|
6.0
|
Mansfield
|
13 806
|
58.6
|
9 746
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
1 350
|
5.4
|
Maroochydore
|
10 318
|
49.2
|
10 650
|
50.8
|
|
|
|
|
2 770
|
11.7
|
Maryborough
|
10 466
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
|
10 678
|
50.5
|
2 852
|
11.9
|
Mirani
|
8 042
|
46.2
|
9 366
|
53.8
|
|
|
|
|
4 564
|
20.8
|
Moggill
|
11 008
|
49.1
|
11 404
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
|
2 052
|
8.4
|
Mt Coot-tha
|
13 888
|
66.1
|
7 116
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
2 021
|
8.8
|
Mt Gravatt
|
14 220
|
64.2
|
7 940
|
35.8
|
|
|
|
|
1 991
|
8.2
|
Mt Isa
|
9 593
|
66.2
|
|
|
4 892
|
33.8
|
|
|
1 100
|
7.1
|
Mt Ommaney
|
13 273
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
|
9 323
|
41.3
|
1 416
|
5.9
|
Mudgeeraba
|
10 585
|
56.8
|
8 060
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
|
4 037
|
17.8
|
Mulgrave
|
12 512
|
61.3
|
|
|
7 903
|
38.7
|
|
|
1 778
|
8.0
|
Mundingburra
|
12 598
|
61.4
|
7 928
|
38.6
|
|
|
|
|
3 293
|
13.8
|
Murrumba
|
15 500
|
71.1
|
6 295
|
28.9
|
|
|
|
|
1 950
|
8.2
|
Nanango
|
6 282
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
|
12 796
|
67.1
|
1 884
|
9.0
|
Nicklin
|
|
|
|
|
5 469
|
26.6
|
15 114
|
73.4
|
4 365
|
17.5
|
Noosa
|
11 977
|
50.9
|
11 552
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
|
2 233
|
8.7
|
Nudgee
|
18 252
|
75.1
|
6 042
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pumicestone
|
12 686
|
66.1
|
6 505
|
33.9
|
|
|
|
|
5 370
|
21.9
|
Redcliffe
|
14 633
|
67.6
|
7 011
|
32.4
|
|
|
|
|
3 091
|
12.5
|
Redlands
|
11 494
|
56.9
|
8 721
|
43.1
|
|
|
|
|
2 023
|
9.1
|
Robina
|
10 909
|
46.0
|
12 822
|
54.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockhampton
|
16 166
|
74.2
|
5 626
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
1 243
|
5.4
|
Sandgate
|
16 774
|
74.5
|
5 750
|
25.5
|
|
|
|
|
1 787
|
7.4
|
South Brisbane
|
16 377
|
74.9
|
5 479
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
|
2 068
|
8.6
|
Southern Downs
|
7 278
|
33.2
|
14 627
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
|
3 464
|
13.7
|
Southport
|
11 986
|
60.8
|
7 714
|
39.2
|
|
|
|
|
2 413
|
10.9
|
Springwood
|
12 442
|
60.4
|
8 169
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
|
3 924
|
16.0
|
Stafford
|
17 052
|
72.4
|
6 503
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
|
1 207
|
4.9
|
Stretton
|
14 778
|
62.7
|
8 805
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surfers Paradise
|
10 147
|
44.7
|
12 546
|
55.3
|
|
|
|
|
1 498
|
6.2
|
Tablelands
|
6 235
|
36.2
|
|
|
10 994
|
63.8
|
|
|
4 229
|
19.7
|
Thuringowa
|
11 052
|
53.6
|
|
|
|
|
9 581
|
46.4
|
3 629
|
15.0
|
Toowoomba North
|
10 503
|
51.9
|
9 747
|
48.1
|
|
|
|
|
1 907
|
8.6
|
Toowoomba South
|
8 216
|
42.1
|
11 319
|
57.9
|
|
|
|
|
3 366
|
14.7
|
Townsville
|
12 319
|
59.3
|
8 443
|
40.7
|
|
|
|
|
1 355
|
6.1
|
Warrego
|
|
|
7 943
|
50.3
|
|
|
7 847
|
49.7
|
4 116
|
20.7
|
Waterford
|
13 755
|
68.0
|
|
|
6 470
|
32.0
|
|
|
1 795
|
8.2
|
Whitsunday
|
10 751
|
59.6
|
7 294
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
|
3 613
|
16.7
|
Woodridge
|
13 138
|
71.1
|
|
|
5 346
|
28.9
|
|
|
2 446
|
11.7
|
Yeerongpilly
|
16 210
|
72.2
|
6 249
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
|
2 015
|
8.2
|
(a) Exhausted votes as a percentage of formal votes.
Table 5 Legislative Assembly:
Electoral Pendulum (a)
District
|
%
|
|
District
|
%
|
|
|
District
|
%
|
ALP Districts
|
|
|
ALP Districts
|
|
|
|
LP/NP Districts
|
|
Bundamba
|
30.9
|
|
Currumbin
|
14.5
|
|
|
Southern Downs
|
16.8
|
Nudgee
|
25.1
|
|
Mt Gravatt
|
14.2
|
|
|
Gregory
|
9.3
|
Brisbane Central
|
25.0
|
|
Greenslopes
|
14.1
|
|
|
Cunningham
|
8.6
|
South Brisbane
|
24.9
|
|
Mackay
|
13.5
|
|
|
Toowoomba South
|
7.9
|
Sandgate
|
24.5
|
|
Stretton
|
12.7
|
|
|
Surfers Paradise
|
5.3
|
Lytton
|
24.4
|
|
Albert
|
12.6
|
|
|
Robina (LP)
|
4.0
|
Rockhampton
|
24.2
|
|
Mundingburra
|
11.4
|
|
|
Mirani
|
3.8
|
Bulimba
|
23.2
|
|
Mulgrave
|
11.3
|
|
|
Hinchinbrook
|
2.8
|
Cook
|
22.9
|
|
Southport
|
10.8
|
|
|
Callide
|
2.3
|
Kurwongbah
|
22.7
|
|
Springwood
|
10.4
|
|
|
Beaudesert
|
2.0
|
Algester
|
22.6
|
|
Whitsunday
|
9.6
|
|
|
Keppel
|
1.5
|
Stafford
|
22.4
|
|
Glass House
|
9.6
|
|
|
Caloundra (LP)
|
1.0
|
Logan
|
22.3
|
|
Townsville
|
9.3
|
|
|
Moggill (LP)
|
0.9
|
Yeerongpilly
|
22.2
|
|
Mt Ommaney
|
8.7
|
|
|
Maroochydore
|
0.8
|
Inala
|
21.5
|
|
Mansfield
|
8.6
|
|
|
Warrego
|
0.3
|
Kallangur
|
21.4
|
|
Hervey Bay
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
Murrumba
|
21.1
|
|
Gaven
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
Woodridge
|
21.1
|
|
Ipswich West
|
7.3
|
|
|
ONP/IND Districts
|
|
Ferny Grove
|
20.5
|
|
Barron River
|
7.3
|
|
|
Nicklin (IND)
|
23.4
|
Waterford
|
18.0
|
|
Redlands
|
6.9
|
|
|
Nanango (IND)
|
17.1
|
Redcliffe
|
17.6
|
|
Mudgeeraba
|
6.8
|
|
|
Tablelands (ONP)
|
13.8
|
Everton
|
17.5
|
|
Burdekin
|
5.1
|
|
|
Lockyer (ONP)
|
7.3
|
Fitzroy
|
17.2
|
|
Aspley
|
4.7
|
|
|
Gladstone (IND)
|
3.5
|
Ipswich
|
16.8
|
|
Thuringowa
|
3.6
|
|
|
Gympie (ONP)
|
3.3
|
Cleveland
|
16.7
|
|
Indooroopilly
|
2.9
|
|
|
Darling Downs (IND)
|
1.1
|
Mt Isa
|
16.2
|
|
Kawana
|
2.6
|
|
|
Maryborough (IND)
|
0.5
|
Mt Coot-tha
|
16.1
|
|
Broadwater
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
Pumicestone
|
16.1
|
|
Charters Towers
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
Chatsworth
|
15.1
|
|
Clayfield
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
Ashgrove
|
15.0
|
|
Toowoomba North
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
Bundaberg
|
14.9
|
|
Burleigh
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
Cairns
|
14.8
|
|
Burnett
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
Capalaba
|
14.6
|
|
Noosa
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Based on Two Candidate Preferred swing to lose.
Table 6 Legislative Assembly
By-elections 1998-2000
Mulgrave (5.12.98)
|
|
|
|
Enrolled 26 253
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
Swing
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
|
Boniface
|
ONP
|
3 470
|
15.6
|
-15.4
|
Wilson
|
NP
|
8 550
|
38.3
|
+8.4
|
Mathison
|
IND
|
266
|
1.2
|
+1.2
|
Metcalfe
|
GRN
|
573
|
2.6
|
+2.6
|
Pitt
|
ALP
|
9 446
|
42.3
|
+5.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
Wilson
|
NP
|
10 097
|
49.4
|
|
Pitt
|
ALP
|
10 358
|
50.6
|
|
Exhausted
|
|
1 776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
22 305
|
99.0
|
|
Informal
|
|
228
|
1.0
|
|
Turnout
|
|
22 533
|
85.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bundamba (5.2.00)
|
|
|
|
Enrolled 23 828
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
Swing
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
|
Curley
|
GRN
|
1 134
|
5.8
|
+2.9
|
Miller
|
ALP
|
11 217
|
57.2
|
+9.0
|
Hughes
|
IND
|
870
|
4.4
|
+4.4
|
Poole
|
IND
|
177
|
0.9
|
+0.9
|
Hill
|
CCA
|
2 723
|
13.9
|
+13.9
|
Heck
|
IND
|
564
|
2.9
|
+2.9
|
Cole
|
LP
|
2 909
|
14.8
|
+2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
Miller
|
ALP
|
12 383
|
71.1
|
|
Cole
|
LP
|
5 041
|
28.9
|
|
Exhausted
|
|
2 170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
19 594
|
97.0
|
|
Informal
|
|
597
|
3.0
|
|
Turnout
|
|
20 191
|
84.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodridge (5.2.00)
|
|
|
|
Enrolled 18 083
|
Candidate
|
Party
|
Votes
|
%
|
Swing
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Preferences
|
|
|
|
|
Lutton
|
IND
|
5 012
|
33.3
|
+33.3
|
Kaiser
|
ALP
|
7 635
|
50.8
|
-0.9
|
Allan
|
LP
|
1 340
|
8.9
|
-5.1
|
Hernandez
|
AD
|
337
|
2.2
|
-3.8
|
Freemarijuana
|
IND
|
386
|
2.6
|
+2.6
|
McKenna
|
IND
|
47
|
0.3
|
+0.3
|
Wilkins
|
CCA
|
275
|
1.8
|
+1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Candidate Preferred
|
|
|
|
|
Kaiser
|
ALP
|
7 955
|
56.5
|
|
Lutton
|
IND
|
6 128
|
43.5
|
|
Exhausted
|
|
949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formal
|
|
15 032
|
97.6
|
|
Informal
|
|
376
|
2.4
|
|
Turnout
|
|
15 408
|
85.2
|
|
Table 7 Legislative Assembly
Elections 1950-2001
Election
|
ALP
|
LP
|
NP
|
AD
|
DLP
|
GRN
|
ONP
|
OTH
|
Total
|
ALP
|
LP/NP
|
|
First Preference Votes
|
Two Party Votes
|
1950
|
46.9
|
29.9
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
100.0
|
48.5
|
51.5
|
1953
|
53.2
|
21.3
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
100.0
|
54.2
|
45.8
|
1956
|
51.2
|
25.1
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
100.0
|
51.6
|
48.4
|
1957
|
28.9
|
23.2
|
20.0
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
4.5
|
100.0
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
1960
|
39.9
|
24.0
|
19.5
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
4.3
|
100.0
|
44.0
|
56.0
|
1963
|
43.8
|
23.8
|
20.3
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
4.9
|
100.0
|
46.4
|
53.6
|
1966
|
43.8
|
25.5
|
19.3
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
5.1
|
100.0
|
47.2
|
52.8
|
1969
|
45.0
|
23.7
|
21.2
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
3.0
|
100.0
|
47.7
|
52.3
|
1972
|
46.8
|
22.2
|
20.0
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
3.3
|
100.0
|
49.2
|
50.8
|
1974
|
36.0
|
31.1
|
27.9
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
3.1
|
100.0
|
38.5
|
61.5
|
1977
|
42.8
|
25.2
|
27.1
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
100.0
|
45.4
|
54.6
|
1980
|
41.5
|
26.9
|
27.9
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
100.0
|
45.3
|
54.7
|
1983
|
44.0
|
14.9
|
38.9
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
100.0
|
46.7
|
53.3
|
1986
|
41.3
|
16.5
|
39.6
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
100.0
|
45.9
|
54.1
|
1989
|
50.3
|
21.1
|
24.1
|
0.4
|
|
0.3
|
|
3.8
|
100.0
|
54.3
|
45.7
|
1992
|
48.7
|
20.4
|
23.7
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
100.0
|
53.8
|
46.2
|
1995
|
42.9
|
22.7
|
26.3
|
1.3
|
|
2.9
|
|
4.0
|
100.0
|
46.7
|
53.3
|
1998
|
38.9
|
16.1
|
15.2
|
1.6
|
|
2.4
|
22.7
|
3.2
|
100.0
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
2001
|
48.9
|
14.3
|
14.2
|
0.3
|
|
2.5
|
8.7
|
11.0
|
100.0
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
Seats Won
|
1950
|
42
|
11
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
75
|
|
|
1953
|
50
|
8
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
75
|
|
|
1956
|
49
|
8
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
75
|
|
|
1957
|
20
|
18
|
24
|
|
11
|
|
|
2
|
75
|
|
|
1960
|
25
|
20
|
26
|
|
4
|
|
|
3
|
78
|
|
|
1963
|
26
|
20
|
26
|
|
1
|
|
|
5
|
78
|
|
|
1966
|
26
|
20
|
27
|
|
1
|
|
|
4
|
78
|
|
|
1969
|
31
|
19
|
26
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
78
|
|
|
1972
|
33
|
21
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
82
|
|
|
1974
|
11
|
30
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
82
|
|
|
1977
|
23
|
24
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
1980
|
25
|
22
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
1983
|
32
|
8
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
82
|
|
|
1986
|
30
|
10
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
1989
|
54
|
9
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
1992
|
54
|
9
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
1995
|
45
|
14
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
89
|
|
|
1998
|
44
|
9
|
23
|
|
|
|
11
|
2
|
89
|
|
|
2001
|
66
|
3
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
5
|
89
|
|
|