| 2.1  | 
    This Chapter reviews the various ways in which Australia’s  relationship with Mexico  and the region is developed and maintained. It looks at the growing number of  meetings and forums in which Australia  is able to strengthen its relationship with Mexico and the region.  | 
  
  
     | 
     | 
  
  
    Mexico | 
    
  
    Joint Experts Group | 
    
  
    | 2.2 | 
    In March 2006, Australia and Mexico agreed  to establish a Joint Experts Group (JEG) to investigate potential ways of  strengthening economic relations, including the possible negotiation of a Free  Trade Agreement sometime in the future.        
        | 
  
  
    | 2.3 | 
    The  inaugural meeting of the JEG took place in Adelaide from 17-18 April 2007.  Officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade; the Department of  Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry; and the Department of Industry, Tourism  and Resources represented Australia.  | 
  
  
    | 2.4  | 
    The JEG will produce a joint report containing  recommendations to be considered by the parliamentary members of both Australia and Mexico.  | 
  
  
    | 2.5  | 
    From an Australian point of view the focus of  the JEG “is for an FTA to be the centrepiece of any recommendations . . .”1 The issues surrounding a possible FTA between Australia and Mexico are  dealt with more fully in Chapter Six.  
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Parliamentary cooperation | 
    
  
    | 2.6  | 
    Since the commencement of diplomatic relations  in 1966, Australia  and Mexico  have been committed to inter-parliamentary cooperation.  In the past four decades, more than 100  high-level visits have nurtured political exchanges. There have been three  visits by Australian Prime Ministers to Mexico and one visit by the Mexican  President to Australia.  The two countries have signed more than 15 agreements and Memoranda of  Understanding in different areas.2 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.7 | 
    Reciprocal ministerial visits have re-enforced Mexico and Australia’s  commitment to their shared values and interests, including the promotion of  democracy, the respect of human rights and an open system of international  trade.3 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)  | 
    
  
    | 2.8  | 
    Australia  and Mexico  are both member states of APEC and work closely and cooperatively through the  annual ministerial, business and academic meetings.   | 
  
  
    | 2.9  | 
    Australian Prime   Minister John Howard’s  visit to the 2002 APEC Leaders Summit in Mexico    City was noted as a high point in bilateral relations.4 Further strengthening of Australia-Mexico relations through APEC can be  expected later this year with Sydney to host the 2007  Leaders Forum.  
        | 
  
  
    | 2.10 | 
    From the Mexican point of view the Australian –  Mexican relationship is an important one. In evidence to the Committee the  Mexican Ambassador to Australia HE Martha Ortiz de Rosas stated: 
      Our convergence as members of APEC has been pivotal in  expanding our bilateral relations. The year 2002, when Mexico chaired  the APEC meetings, saw an important growth in the number of links between our  governments and people. I would dare to say that it was then that Mexico and Australia  really started to know more about each other.5 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.11 | 
    This view is shared by the Australian Government  who regards Mexico  as “an enthusiastic and important member of APEC” that “adds much to the organisation.”6 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    World Trade Organisation (WTO) – Doha  Round | 
    
  
    | 2.12 | 
    Both Mexico and Australia are  active and constructive participants in WTO matters. In 2003 Trade Minister Mark Vaile attended the 5th WTO  Ministerial Meeting in Cancun,   Mexico.   | 
  
  
    | 2.13  | 
    Australia  and Mexico’s  strong agrarian sectors share specific export challenges such as prohibitive  market access barriers and high levels of subsidies. Both Australia and Mexico have  rigorously engaged the WTO negotiations process for improved results in these  areas.  | 
  
  
    | 2.14 | 
    DFAT told the Committee that in relation to the  WTO: 
   . . . we do work with Mexico  reasonably closely on issues like agriculture reform. But one could add the  caveat that over recent years, whilst Mexico  has been reasonably active in a WTO context, most of its trade policy focus has  been bilateral.7 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.15 | 
    Although both nations have expressed a desire to  further discuss the possibility of a free trade agreement, both parties  remained committed to participating in the multilateral processes of the WTO.8 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Scientific and Technological Cooperation | 
    
  
    | 2.16 | 
    In 1981 Australia and Mexico signed  the Basic Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation in order to  strengthen bilateral relations in the science and technology field.9 The Australian Department of Education Science and Technology (DEST), manages  this treaty-level Agreement.10 
       | 
  
  
    | 2.17  | 
    The primary mechanism for consultation under  this agreement is the Joint Australia-Mexico Commission for Scientific and  Technological Cooperation. According to the agreement, a Joint Commission shall  meet every two years alternatively in each country to discuss the cooperation  in science and technology. DEST’s Mexican partner agency in the joint  commission is the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology (CONACYT)11.  The last meeting of the Joint Commission was held in Mexico City in 2000. 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.18 | 
    The length of time since the last meeting  reflects the obstacles that face scientific and research endeavours between Mexico and Australia. DEST  told the Committee that, in relation to the current state of the Basic  Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation: 
      In January 2006 Mr   Downer visited Mexico and,  when he met with the Mexican foreign minister, they mutually agreed to try to  reinvigorate the science and technology relationship. The intention was to have  a joint meeting some time later that year. However, an election in Mexico  intervened and, naturally enough, created different priorities for the Mexican  government, and so that meeting still has not occurred.12 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.19 | 
    Australia  too, has prioritised the pursuit of science and technology relationships with  other countries. DEST stated: 
      What the Australian science community have been saying to us  is that they want to focus on two groups: the first group are those who are  already the best performers globally in science and technology, and they are  essentially the United States and European countries—the EU; the second group  are those countries which are building their capacity now, that are investing  heavily in science in their human capability and in their infrastructure. Those  are countries like India,  China  and Brazil.  Mexico  does not fit into either of those categories. While there are niche areas that  CSIRO is exploring, we would not see a high level of mutual benefit in gearing  up a relationship in science and technology collaboration. The value is not  there by comparison with the value of putting a lot more resources into other  countries.13 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.20 | 
    Both countries have expressed their interest in  reactivating the scientific and technological cooperation through the exchange  of scientific and technical information, the reciprocal visits of scientists  and the participation in seminars and the implementation of joint projects of  research.14 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Cooperation and friendship in agriculture and livestock | 
    
  
    | 2.21  | 
    A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed  in 2003 between the Australian Government and the State of Hidalgo, Mexico, on cooperation and  friendship in agriculture and livestock, committing to facilitate and stimulate  cooperation in livestock and agriculture among the institutions of both  countries in the private, public and social sectors and among their research  and senior education institutions. The primary outcome of this MoU has been the  resumption of live sheep exports to Mexico in early 2006, following the  rapid decline in exports in 2002.15 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    The Double Taxation Performance Agreement | 
    
  
    | 2.22 | 
    This  agreement was signed on 9 September 2002 and entered into force from 1 January  2004. It gives impetus to bilateral relations by clarifying the taxation rights  of the two countries. The agreement also introduces measures to relieve double  taxation, and prevent fiscal evasion.16 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.23 | 
    The agreement prevents double taxation by  allocating taxing rights between Australia and Mexico  regarding all forms of income flows between the two countries.  | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    The Australia  Festival in Mexico | 
    
  
    | 2.24 | 
    The Australian Embassy’s annual Australia  Festival is Australia’s  largest promotional event in Mexico  reaching 10 million Mexicans and in 2006 generated positive media mentions of Australia  valued at A$6million. In 2006 the festival included 30 seminars, wine tastings  and a two day exhibition commemorating the 40 years of diplomatic  relations between Australia  and Mexico.17 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.25 | 
    Building on the goodwill and general interest in  Australia  that the festivals engender, the Embassy utilises the Festival to promote and  conduct Australian cultural activities, education, business migration and to  increase and improve business linkages.18 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    The Committee’s view | 
    
  
    | 2.26 | 
    The Committee is pleased with the level of  engagement between Mexican and Australian officials and notes the very friendly  and positive relations between the two countries. Scientific cooperation is an  important area of the relationship and clearly needs invigorating.   | 
  
  
    | 2.27 | 
    The Committee recommends that DEST reactivate  scientific and technical cooperation with Mexico.  | 
  
  
    | 2.28 | 
    Recommendation 1The Committee recommends that the Australian  Government, through the Department of Education, Science and Training,  reactivate scientific and technological cooperation with Mexico.  | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    The region | 
    
  
    | 2.29 | 
    Australia  has no diplomatic representation in Central America.  Australia’s  embassy in Mexico City  covers Australia’s  relations with countries in Central America on  a non-resident basis. No Central American country has representation in Australia.19 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.30 | 
    Trade and investment ties are nevertheless  growing consistently from a very small base. Agribusiness, food commodities and  the provision of professional services are areas where expansion potential  exists.20 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Council on Australia-Latin America  Relations (COALAR) | 
    
  
    | 2.31 | 
    In 2001, the Australian government established  COALAR in response to the September 2000 report of the Trade Sub-Committee on  Building Australia’s Trade and Investment Relationship with South   America.21 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.32 | 
    The Council, which has a budget for 2006-7 of A$500,000,  aims to enhance commercial, political and social relations between Australia and Latin America. Since its inception, the Council has been  active in promoting Latin America as a market  for Australian exporters.22 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.33 | 
    Currently the priorities of COALAR  are: 
  - to  influence corporate Australia and assist in developing government policies so  as to enhance Australia’s economic, political and social relations with the  region, particularly in the areas of tourism, investment, and agribusiness;
 
  - to support Australia’s broader diplomatic and  economic objectives in the region through cultural promotion and education; and
 
  - to foster a greater awareness of Australia in Latin America and of Latin America  in Australia.23
  
        | 
  
  
    | 2.34 | 
    Each year the Council produces a business plan  which sets out its activities for the coming 12 months.  The COALAR business plan for 2006-07  identified the following activities: 
- continue to  encourage visits to Latin America by Australian Cabinet Ministers,  Parliamentary Secretaries and Senior Officials;
 
 - support  well-targeted business delegations and other high level visits to the region;
 
 - implement a  funding program that broadens the reach and profile of COALAR and strengthens  the Council's four pillars of activity in tourism, education, culture and  business;
 
 - work to  highlight effectively significant milestones in Australia - Latin America  relations, including: 40 years of diplomatic relations between Australia and  Chile (in 2006); 40 years of diplomatic relations between Australia and Mexico  (in 2006); 20 years of the Cairns Group (in 2006); and other relevant occasions;
 
- continue the  Council's communications strategy to lift the profile of Latin America in  Australia and Australia in Latin America, including by encouraging and  facilitating two-way visits of journalists, in particular an Australian  journalist to visit Latin America;
 
 - strengthen  links with Australian academics engaged in the delivery of Spanish language and  Latin American studies; and
 
- consolidate  links established by the COALAR funded sports strategy in 2005-06.24
  
        | 
  
  
    2.35  | 
    The Council has developed as a significant  additional asset for Australia  in pursuing trade and investment opportunities in the region.25 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Forum for East Asia – Latin   America Cooperation (FEALAC) | 
    
  
    | 2.36 | 
    FEALAC provides  another avenue for Australia  to expand and strengthen relationships with Mexico and the region. The Forum  has 30 member nations including Australia,  Costa Rica,  El Salvador,  Panama,  Guatemala,  Nicaragua  and Mexico.26 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.37 | 
    The  purpose of the Forum is to promote better understanding, political and  economic dialogue and cooperation in all areas so as to achieve more effective  and fruitful relations and closer cooperation between the two regions. FEALAC  engages both the public and private sectors.   | 
  
  
    | 2.38 | 
    The first  Ministerial Meeting for FEALAC was held in Santiago, Chile  in March 2001. This meeting produced a ‘Framework Document’ to form the basis  for FEALAC activities. The Framework Document outlines the following  objectives: 
- To  increase mutual understanding, trust, political dialogue and friendly  cooperation among member states with a view to enriching and sharing  experiences and developing new partnerships;
 
- To  tap the potential of multidisciplinary cooperation, inter alia, in economics,  trade investment, finance, science and technology, environment protection, culture,  sport, and people-to-people exchanges; and
 
- To  expand common ground on important international political and economic issues  with a view to working together in different international forums in order to  safeguard our common interests27
  
        | 
  
  
    | 2.39 | 
    FEALAC  contains three open-ended Working Groups on: Political/Cultural Cooperation,  Economic/Social Cooperation and Education/Science  and Technology Cooperation.   | 
  
  
    | 2.40 | 
    Australia  and Costa Rica  co-chair the Working Group on Education/Science and Technology Cooperation. The  first meeting of this Working Group took place in  June 2002 at the Australian   Academy of Science in Canberra.   | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    Other global organisations | 
    
  
    | 2.41 | 
    WTO –  Doha Round — Australia,  Costa Rica  and Guatemala  share the view that the greatest prospects for agricultural trade liberalisation  will come from an ambitious outcome from the WTO Doha Round of Negotiations.  All three countries place a high importance on the resumption of the currently  suspended round28. 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.42 | 
    Cairns  Group — Composed of  developed and developing countries across five continents, the Cairns Group is  committed to achieving free and fair trade in agriculture that provides real  and sustainable benefits for the developing world29. Australia cooperates with Costa Rica and Guatemala in  the Cairns Group, to promote our common commitment to agricultural trade  reform. 
        | 
  
  
    | 2.43 | 
    Commonwealth Organisations — As fellow members  of the Commonwealth of Nations, Australia  shares friendly ties with Belize  and cooperates in various Commonwealth organisations and events30. 
        | 
  
  
     | 
      | 
  
  
    The Committee’s view | 
    
  
    | 2.44 | 
    While the Committee believes the level of  engagement between Australian officials and officials of Mexico and the region  has been reasonable there is considerable potential for upgrading the  relationship.  | 
  
  
    | 2.45 | 
    In its submission DFAT suggested FEALAC had “some  way to go to fulfil its potential”.31 Unfortunately the Committee did not receive any evidence as to how this might  be achieved or in what areas FEALAC could be strengthened or better utilised.  
        | 
  
  
    | 2.46 | 
    The Committee therefore recommends that DFAT review  the viability of FEALAC and, if viable, ensure a greater effort is made to fulfil  its potential.  | 
  
  
    | 2.47 | 
    Recommendation 2The Committee  recommends that DFAT review the viability of FEALAC and, if it is  determined to be viable, ensure a greater effort is made fulfil its potential.  | 
  
  
    | 1  | 
    Mr John Gerard Owens, Assistant Secretary,  Canada and Latin America Branch, Americas Division, Department of Foreign  Affairs and Trade, Evidence, 7/02/2007,  p. 11. Back  | 
  
  
    | 2  | 
    Embassy of Mexico, Submission No. 3, Vol 1, p.  35. Back | 
  
  
    | 3  | 
    Embassy of Mexico, Submission No. 3, Vol 1, p.  35. Back | 
  
  
    | 4  | 
    DFAT, Submission No 10, Vol 1, p. 122. Back | 
  
  
    | 5  | 
    Ambassador Martha Ortiz   de Rosas, Ambassador, Embassy of  Mexico in Australia, Evidence, 28/02/2007, p. 2. Back | 
  
  
    | 6  | 
    Dr Michael   Graham Adams, Director, Regional Trade Policy, Trade Development  Division, Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Evidence, 7/02/2007,  p. 9. Back | 
  
  
    | 7  | 
    Dr Michael Graham Adams,  Director, Regional Trade Policy, Trade Development Division, Department of  Foreign Affairs and Trade, Evidence, 7/02/2007, p. 9. Back | 
  
  
    | 8  | 
    DAFF, Submission  No.13, Vol 1 p. 192. Back  | 
  
  
    | 9  | 
    Embassy of Mexico, Submission No. 3, Vol 1, p. 43. Back | 
  
  
    | 10  | 
    DEST, Submission No.2, Vol 1 p.18. Back | 
  
  
    | 11  | 
    DEST, Submission  No.2, Vol 1 p. 22. Back | 
  
  
    | 12  | 
    Ms Julie Walding, Director, India and the  Americas Section, International Science Branch, Science Group, Department of  Education, Science and Training, Evidence,  22/02/2007, p.9.  (proof) Back | 
  
  
    | 13  | 
    Ms Julie Walding, Director, India and the  Americas Section, International Science Branch, Science Group, Department of  Education, Science and Training, Evidence,  22/02/2007, p.9. Back | 
  
  
    | 14  | 
    Embassy of Mexico, Submission No. 3, Vol 1, p. 43. Back | 
  
  
    | 15  | 
    DAFF, Submission  No. 13, Vol 1, p. 191 Back | 
  
  
    | 16  | 
    http://www.dfat.gov.au/geo/mexico/mexico_brief.html 14 June 2007 Back | 
  
  
    | 17  | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 139. Back | 
  
  
    | 18  | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 139. Back | 
  
  
    | 19  | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 123. Back | 
  
  
    | 20  | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 123. Back | 
  
  
    | 21 | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 123. Back | 
  
  
    | 22 | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 123. Back | 
  
  
    | 23 | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 124. Back | 
  
  
    | 24 | 
    http://www.dfat.gov.au/coalar/coalar_business_plan.html 15 June 2007 Back | 
  
  
    | 25 | 
    DFAT, Submission No 10, Vol 1, p. 124. Back | 
  
  
    | 26 | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p. 124. Back | 
  
  
    | 27 | 
    http://fealac.mofat.go.kr/eng/document/basis.php 15 June 2007 Back | 
  
  
    | 28 | 
    DAFF, Submission  No. 13, Vol 1, p. 184. Back | 
  
  
    | 29 | 
    http://www.cairnsgroup.org/introduction.html 18 June 2007 Back | 
  
  
    | 30 | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p 123. Back | 
  
  
    | 31 | 
    DFAT, Submission  No 10, Vol 1, p 108. Back |