Standing Committee on Economics, Finance and Public 
        Administration 
      
      Media release, 4 December 1997
      PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF ACCC USE OF LAWYERS IN AUSTRALIS MEDIA CASE 
      
       Australia's major competition watchdog, the Australian Competition and 
        Consumer Commission's, use of lawyers in the Australis Media case will 
        be examined next week by the House of Representatives Financial Institutions 
        and Public Administration Committee at a public hearing in Canberra on 
        Thursday 4 December 1997. 
      
 According to the Committee Chairman, Mr David Hawker MP, " at the Committee's 
        hearing with the ACCC on 20 November 1997 the ACCC confirmed that some 
        of its legal advice over the Australis/Foxtel merger was paid for by Optus 
        and admitted that a similar approach has been used in some other cases." 
      
 "The basis of the Committee's concern with this matter is the principle 
        that, while the ACCC will inevitably stress that it 'take sides' in mergers 
        that it believes are not in the 'public interest', the ACCC has an obligation 
        to be not only independent but also to be perceived to be independent 
        of commercial interests in its operations which impact substantially on 
        commercial enterprises in almost every sector" Mr Hawker said. 
      
 "Professor Fels was unprepared for the detailed line of questioning 
        put by the Committee on this issue and he agreed to 'have a real hard 
        look at this matter'. The ACCC sought to stress that there was nothing 
        illegal in what they had done and they had used this approach several 
        times before." 
      
 Mr Hawker said "some of the matters that the Committee would address 
        at the hearing next week include: 
      
 
      
        - the general question of whether it is appropriate for the ACCC (an 
          independent statutory authority) to receive financial support (in whatever 
          form) from a beneficiary of a case; 
        
 - the nature of the ACCC's legal assistance and the circumstances in 
          which it was provided in the Foxtel/Australis case; 
        
 - details of other cases where the ACCC has used a similar approach 
          in the acceptance of legal assistance; 
        
 - the ACCC acceptance of responsibility for the strategic directions 
          used in its Australis/Foxtel legal case; and 
        
 - the nature of any objections raised by other parties about legal assistance 
          used to supplement the Australian Government Solicitors' resources in 
          that case." 
      
 
       Appearing before the Committee will be the Australian Government Solicitor 
        and the ACCC. 
      
 "It is indisputable that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, 
        must be independent, accountable and transparent, and be seen to be independent, 
        accountable and transparent" said Mr Hawker. "If there are more appropriate 
        ways in which the ACCC should be performing its role to achieve those 
        objectives and facilitate competition and ultimately consumers, the Committee 
        wants this identified and the appropriate procedural and legislative changes 
        made." 
      
 Ends // 28 November 1997 Further information:
        David Hawker MP (Chairman) (03) 5572 1100 (Electorate) // (02) 6277 4100 
        (Parl House)
        Bev Forbes (Inquiry Secretary) (02) 6277 4587
      
 
      
Draft Program - Public hearing  
        
 Review of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission annual 
          report 1996-97  
        
 Thursday 4 December 1997, 10.00am - 1.00pm 
      
      
 House of Representatives Committee Room 2R2
        Parliament House
        CANBERRA 
      
 10.00am Australian Government Solicitor 
      
 10.45am Australian Competition and Consumer Commission 
      
      
Back to top