Introduction | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.1  | 
                          The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water  and Sediments, 2004 (the Convention) was adopted by the International  Maritime Organization (IMO) on 13 February 2004.                            | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.2 | 
                          Australia  signed the Convention, subject to ratification, on 27 May 2005.1                               | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Background | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.3 | 
                          Ballast water consists of water that is taken on  board a ship for the enhancement of the ship's stability at sea. Ballast water  may contain sediment if it is taken on whilst the ship is in shallow or turbid  water. These sediments and the water can contain a wide range of live marine  flora and fauna. These are then transported away from their original source and  discharged with ballast water into the destination port as the ship is loaded  with cargo. The larvae and spores of some marine animals and plants can survive  this journey.  | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.4  | 
                          Ballast water is now recognised as a major source  of spreading exotic marine pests around the world. In response the IMO has  developed the International Convention  for the Control and Management of ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments. The  development of the Convention fulfills an objective of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the  Sea which inter alia called for countries to take all measures to reduce  and control the accidental or intentional introduction of marine species into  new environments. Similarly the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development  called for action at all levels to accelerate the development of measures to  address the problem of the transport via ballast water of invasive alien marine  species.2                               | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.5  | 
                          Australia  is particularly vulnerable as many cargo ships arrive here without cargo and  therefore with a large quantity of ballast water. If the organisms survive the  transport and discharge process they may become established in the new  community and populations may flourish.3                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.6  | 
                          Each year, around 200 million tonnes of ships’  ballast water is discharged into Australian ports by 13,000 ship visits from  some 600 overseas ports.4                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.7 | 
                          There are now estimated to be more than 250  exotic species known to be present in the Australian marine environment. The  introduced organisms can affect local marine life in a number of ways, by  competing with native species for food or space, preying on native species,  crossbreeding with native species or by changing the habitat. Generally if the  effects of introduced organisms are sufficiently severe they are referred to as  “pests”. Approximately one in six introduced marine species become pests.5                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.8  | 
                          It is estimated that between 10 and 40 per cent Australia’s  fishing industry is potentially vulnerable to marine pest incursion.6 The North Pacific Seastar, for example, is a major pest introduced into Australia via  ballast water.7 According to evidence given to the Committee by the Department of Agriculture,  Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), the North Pacific Sea Star has been linked to a  significant impact on the spotted handfish stocks in Tasmanian waters and to a  decline in scallops and other fisheries in Port Phillip Bay in Victoria.8 Some introduced marine species may pose threats to the Great   Barrier Reef.9                              | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.9  | 
                          With expanding international maritime trade, it  is considered to be in Australia’s  interest to implement more uniform and stringent requirements to manage the  risk of introducing marine pests into Australian waters. Consequently, as DAFF  noted: “Australia  was one of the first countries to raise this issue at the international level  and has been particularly active in developing this convention over a number of  years.”10                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.10 | 
                          In evidence to the Committee, DAFF emphasised  the importance of ratification of the Convention for Australia as it provides  internationally consistent rules for ballast water management in an expanding  trading market: 
                            Initially, management will be by exchange of ballast water.  But, under the convention, ships built after 2009 will be required to have  treatment systems, significantly reducing the risk of marine pest  translocation. Further, any increased shipping costs will be equivalent across  countries and will not have an effect on Australia’s ability to compete in  export markets. In most circumstances, the convention will require that ballast  water exchange be undertaken at least 200 nautical miles from the nearest land  and in waters at least 200 metres in depth. 
                             
                          The convention includes specific and unique protection  measures for the Great Barrier Reef. The outer  edge of the Great Barrier Reef is considered  to be nearest land for the purposes of the Conventions’s operation  requirements.  | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.11 | 
                          DAFF also highlighted the international  significance of Australian ratification in the NIA: “Ratification of the  Convention by Australia  would be regarded positively by other IMO-member States, and would heighten Australia’s  reputation as a world leader on environmental issues.”11                               | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          The purpose of the convention | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.12 | 
                          The Convention is designed to prevent, minimise  and ultimately eliminate risks to the marine environment arising from the  transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens via ships’ ballast water  and sediments.  | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Obligations | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.13  | 
                          The Convention is divided into general  obligations set out in the Articles of the Convention and specific requirements  in Regulations contained in the Annex. Some key general obligations include: 
                         - Parties  must give effect to the provisions of the Convention and develop ballast water  management plans in order to prevent, minimize and ultimately eliminate the  transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens through the control and  management of ships’ ballast water and sediments (Article 2(1) and (5)).  Parties may take more stringent measures in a manner consistent with international law (Article 2(3)). Parties  must also ensure that ballast water management practices do not cause greater  harm than they prevent to the environment (Article 2(6)).
 
                         - The  Convention also requires Parties to
  
                         
                           - take  effective measures to ensure that ships flying their flag comply with the  requirements of the Convention, including the Regulations, and develop national  policies, strategies or programmes for ballast water management in their waters  (Article 4)
 
                          - ensure  that ports and terminals where cleaning or repair of ballast tanks occurs  provide adequate facilities for the reception of ballast water sediments  (Article 5)
 
                          - promote,  facilitate and share with other Parties the results of scientific and technical  research on ballast water management, and monitor the effects of ballast water  management on waters in their jurisdiction (Article 6), and
 
                         - survey  and certify ships flying their flag in accordance with the Regulations (Article  7).
   - Parties  are required to co-operate to enforce the provisions of the Convention (Article  10). This includes a requirement to prohibit and establish sanctions under  domestic law for violations of the Convention, and to take action, or provide  relevant information and evidence to other Parties, in relation to alleged  violations. A Party’s laws must prohibit both violations committed by ships  entitled to fly their flag, or operating under their authority, wherever the  violation occurs (Article 8(1)), and violations committed within their  jurisdiction by any ship covered by the Convention (Article 8(2)).
 
                        - The  Regulations establish Ballast Water Management and Control Requirements, and  Standards for Ballast Water Management that must be met. Subject to entry into  force and commencing from a date determined according to the ballast water  capacity and date of vessel construction, ships covered by the Convention will  be required to discharge ballast water in accordance with the Annex (Regulation  A-2). The regulations further require ships to have an approved Ballast Water  Management Plan (Regulation B-1) and to maintain a Ballast Water Record Book  (Regulation B‑2) to record when ballast water is taken on board, circulated or  treated, and discharged into the sea. Ships may only conduct ballast water  exchange in specified areas (Regulation B-4) and are required to be surveyed  (Regulation E‑1) and certified (Regulation E-2). Port authorities will be  empowered to inspect ships and take samples of ballast water.
 
                        - The  obligations will apply to all ships entitled to fly the flag of a party to the  Convention, as well as to ships not entitled to fly the flag of a Party but which  operate under the authority of a Party.
 
                     - The  obligations do not apply to ships not designed or constructed to carry ballast  water, ships with permanent ballast water in sealed tanks that are not subject  to discharge, and any military or other ship used for governmental non‑commercial  service.
   | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.14 | 
                          Article 2(e) provides that the Convention will  not apply to any warship, naval auxiliary or other ship owned or operated by a State  and used only on government non-commercial service. However, each Party shall  ensure, by the adoption of appropriate measures not impairing operations or  operational capabilities of such ships owned or operated by it, that such ships  act in a manner consistent, so far as is reasonable and practicable, with the  Convention.12                               | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Consultation  | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.15 | 
                          The Australian  Government has been represented throughout the IMO’s development of the  Convention and has consulted with relevant groups/bodies including the  Australian Shipowners Association, Shipping Australia, the Minerals Council of  Australia, the National Bulk Commodities Group and the Association of  Australian Ports and Marine Authorities. The NIA indicates that these groups  support ratification of the Convention. Consultations were also undertaken with  other federal, state and Northern    Territory government departments, other IMO Member   States and relevant  Non-Government Organisations.13                               | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Implementation and costs | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.16 | 
                          Under the Quarantine  Act 1908 all ships arriving in Australian ports from overseas are required  to comply with mandatory ballast water management arrangements. These  arrangements are currently consistent with the Convention but only protect Australia from  the introduction of marine pests from ships entering Australian waters. Similar  arrangements are required to prevent the spread of marine pests in Australian  waters from ships travelling between Australian ports that discharge ballast  taken up in Australian waters.14                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.17 | 
                          The Convention will be implemented through  Commonwealth, State and Northern    Territory legislation, and jurisdictions are  considering the legislative models that would best give full effect to the  Convention within Australia.15 Although all jurisdictions have expressed support for ratification of the  Convention, the Committee noted that New    South Wales had, in the context of the Natural  Resource Management Ministerial Council, expressed some reservations concerning  implementation. DAFF confirmed that the South Wales Government had some  concerns about costs: “But New South    Wales continued to participate in the development of  arrangements, and we are working on finding some alternative cost-sharing  arrangements … so we are very optimistic that all the relevant States and  Territories will be on board.”16                              | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.18 | 
                          DAFF has proposed the establishment of an  Australian Ballast Water Management Unit to provide a single point of contact  for industry. Located within the Department, the Unit will track and monitor  ships around Australia,  provide advice to the shipping industry and jurisdictions, and manage the risk  profiling, targeting and coordination of the compliance inspections. A phase-in  transitional period with voluntary compliance will be introduced prior to mandatory  requirements commencing.17                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.19 | 
                          Following  passage of the proposed legislation by the Australian Parliament and by the  Parliaments of the States and the Northern Territory, it is proposed  that Australia ratify the Convention  by depositing an instrument of ratification with the IMO.18                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.20 | 
                          In the period from 2007 to 2008, the cost of the  regulation will be the costs of exchanging high-risk ballast water at sea and  these will vary according to the management option implemented. During the  transitional period between 2009 and 2016, regulation costs will be a function  of the proportion of ships still using the ballast water exchange procedures  and the proportion of ships using on-board treatment. From 2016, the cost of  regulation will be the cost of implementing permanent on-board ballast  treatment facilities on all ships.19                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.21 | 
                          The costs incurred by government in implementing  the ballast water management arrangements arising from the obligations of the  Convention will be recovered from the shipping industry via a uniform shipping  levy to be applied to all ships on a quarterly basis.20                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.22 | 
                          The provision of services for implementation of  the mandatory elements of the Ballast Water Management Arrangements (domestic  ballast water inspections and single point of contact for the shipping  industry) is expected to cost in the order of $800,000 per annum (in addition  to current costs of international ballast water management arrangements of $1.5  million per annum). Apart from levy costs, the direct costs to the shipping  industry from implementing the requirements are expected to be approximately $5.3 million per annum.21 The benefits of preventing further incursions of marine pests (and the costs of  incursions) via ballast water could exceed $30 million a year.22                              | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Entry into force and withdrawal | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.23 | 
                          The Convention will enter into force twelve  months after the date on which not less than thirty States, the combined  merchant fleets of which constitute not less than thirty-five per cent of gross  tonnage of the world’s merchant fleet have ratified the Convention (Article  18(1)). As at 6 April 2007,  eight member countries had ratified the Convention, accounting for just over  three per cent of the world’s merchant shipping by gross tonnage.23                               | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.24 | 
                          Article 20 of the Convention provides that any  Party may denounce the Convention by written notification to the IMO at any  time after two years from the date on which the Convention enters into force  for that Party. Denunciation takes effect one year after receipt or such longer  as may be specified in the notification.24                               | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Conclusion and recommendation | 
                        
                        
                          | 8.25 | 
                          The Committee welcomes this development of the  Convention as an important response to the risks to the marine environment  arising from the transfer of harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens via ships’  ballast water.  | 
                        
                        
                          |   | 
                          Recommendation 8
                              The Committee supports the Convention on the International Convention for the Control and Management  of Ships’ Ballast Water and recommends that binding treaty action be taken.  | 
                        
                        
                          |   | 
                          Dr Andrew Southcott MP 
                            Committee  Chair
                            | 
                        
                      
       
       
                      
                        | 1  | 
                        National Interest Analysis (NIA), para. 1. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 2  | 
                        Mr Charles Willcocks, Transcript of evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 46. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 3  | 
                        Department of Environment and Water  Resources, “The Introduction of Marine Pests to the Australian Environment via  Shipping”, <www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/ktp/pests-via-shipping.html>. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 4  | 
                        NIA, para. 7. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 5  | 
                        Department of Environment and Water  Resources, “The Introduction of Marine Pests to the Australian Environment via  Shipping”, <www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/ktp/pests-via-shipping.html>.  Marine pests can also be introduced via hull fouling. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 6  | 
                        Regulation Impact Statement (RIS), p. 7-8. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 7  | 
                        Media Release by the Minister for  Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, 1 June 2005. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 8  | 
                        Mr Andrew Johnson, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 47. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 9  | 
                        Mr Andrew Johnson, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 48. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 10  | 
                        Mr Charles Willcocks, Trancript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 46-47. Back  | 
                      
                      
                        | 11  | 
                        NIA, para. 10. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 12  | 
                        International  Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, London, 13 February 2004. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 13  | 
                        For further details on consultation, see  Annex to the NIA. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 14  | 
                        This requirement has been in place since  2001. See NIA, para. 8.  Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 15  | 
                        NIA, para. 20. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 16  | 
                        Mr Andrew Johnson, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 48-49. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 17  | 
                        NIA, para. 21. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 18 | 
                        NIA, para. 22. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 19  | 
                        NIA, para. 23. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 20 | 
                        NIA, para. 24. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 21  | 
                        NIA, para. 25. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 22 | 
                        RIS, p. 9. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 23 | 
                        NIA, para. 3. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 24 | 
                        NIA, para. 30. Back |