Introduction | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.1  | 
                          The Patent  Cooperation Treaty1,  which facilitates the filing and assessment of a patent application in multiple  jurisdictions, provides for the appointment of International Searching  Authorities (ISA) and International Preliminary Examining Authorities (IPEA).  The Original Agreement appoints and provides for the functioning of the  Australian Patent Office (APO) as an ISA and IPEA, and is therefore necessary  to allow for the filing of ‘international applications’ for patents in  Australia.2 The APO has been an ISA and IPEA since 31 March 1980.3                           
                           | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.2 | 
                          The Original Agreement is due to expire on 31 December 2007. Although  an agreement to replace the Original Agreement is currently being prepared, it  will not be ready to enter into force when the Original Agreement expires.  Australia and the International Bureau of WIPO have agreed to extend the  operation of the Original Agreement to either 31 December 2008 or when the  new agreement enters into force. This will allow for the APO  to continue to operate as an ISA and IPEA without interruption.4 
                            A new agreement is  being negotiated between WIPO and current international authorities; however,  it will not be finalised in time for Australia’s domestic treaty-making  processes to be complete so that it can come into force on 1 January 2008.  After negotiations with the International Bureau of WIPO, an extension  agreement has been developed to allow Australia time to complete all necessary  domestic processes in relation to the new 2008-2017 agreement.5  
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Reasons for the agreement | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.3 | 
                          WIPO has proposed a new draft model agreement,  on which future agreements for appointing ISAs and IPEAs will be based. The  text of the new individual country agreements for the next ten years will not  be settled and approved by the Assembly of the International Patent Cooperation  Union until October 2007—this includes the proposed new agreement with  Australia (the 2008–2017 Agreement)—and the Australian treaties process for the  2008–2017 Agreement will not be able to be completed by 31 December 2007. It is  therefore necessary for the International Bureau of WIPO and Australia to  extend the operation of the Original Agreement until the 2008–2017 Agreement  enters into force. The 2008–2017 Agreement will be subject to the Australian  treaty process when it is finalised.6 
                           | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.4  | 
                          The Patent Cooperation Treaty simplifies and  streamlines the process of filing for patent protection in a number of  countries by filing a single international patent application, saving time,  work and money for any person seeking a patent in a number of countries. An  essential element in this simplified process is the appointment of ISAs and  IPEAs (such as the APO) to conduct the  required international search and examination providing significant cost  savings to patent applicants. There is considerable international prestige  associated with appointment as an ISA and IPEA.7 
                            It is crucial that  the Australian Patent Office continues as an international authority in order  to enable Australian patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation  Treaty to be searched and examined. IP Australia is currently the only  international authority that Australian patent applicants can use for carrying  out their international searches and international preliminary examination. All  Australians filing Patent Cooperation Treaty applications stand to be adversely  affected if this extension agreement does not go ahead.8  
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.5  | 
                          The APO issues reports on approximately 3000  international searches each year. This workload has doubled since 1997 and  continues to increase.9 
                            In addition to  providing international authority services to its own nationals, the  accreditation agreements with WIPO can include extension of those services to  other nationals. For example, Australia’s agreement includes an obligation to  provide international authority services to developing countries and New  Zealand. The Australian Patent Office has entered into bilateral arrangements  with countries in the Asia-Pacific to conduct patent searches. Currently the  Australian Patent Office also does patent searches for many countries including  New Zealand, Thailand and Singapore, and has been approached to do work for  other countries.10 
                           | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.6  | 
                          Further benefits to Australia from theAPO'sstanding as an International Authority include a strong and  respected voice in international fora, particularly in Patent Cooperation  Treaty-related matters in WIPO. This reflects in turn on Australia's  standing in the international intellectual property community and its ability  to influence that community to the benefit of Australian intellectual property  rights holders.11 
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Obligations | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.7 | 
                          The Extension Agreement extends the application  of obligations under the Original Agreement until 31 December or until the 2008–2017  Agreement comes into force, whichever is the sooner. It creates no new  obligations.12 
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Costs | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.8  | 
                          There are no additional costs to government or  industry as a result of the Extension Agreement.13 
                            IP Australia operates on a full cost recovery basis and our  activities are revenue neutral to government.14 
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Future treaty action | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.9 | 
                          The 2008-2017 Agreement is expected to be finalised  in late 2007. Once finalised, it will be subject to the Australian treaty  process.15 
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Withdrawal or Denunciation | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.10 | 
                          Article 12 of the Original Agreement provides for  the unilateral termination, upon one year’s notice, by either party. The Extension  Agreement will not alter this termination provision. Any termination on the  part of Australia  will be subject to the Australian treaty process.16 
                           | 
                        
                        
                           | 
                            | 
                        
                        
                          Conclusion and Recommendation | 
                        
                        
                          | 7.11 | 
                          The Committee agrees that continuation of the  APO as an international authority is important for Australia and crucial for  Australians filing patents under the Patent Cooperation Treaty. Accordingly,  the Committee supports the extension agreement.  | 
                        
                        
                          |   | 
                          Recommendation 7The committee supports the Extension of the Agreement in relation to the functioning of the  Australian Patent Office as an International Searching Authority and  International Preliminary Examining Authority under the Patent Cooperation  Treaty and recommends binding  treaty action be taken.  | 
                        
                      
       
       
                      
                        | 1  | 
                        [1980] ATS 6. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 2  | 
                        This agreement was reviewed by JSCOT in  its Eleventh Report in November 1997.  Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 3  | 
                        Mrs Fatima Beattie, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 43.   Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 4  | 
                        NIA, p. 1. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 5  | 
                        Mrs Fatima Beattie, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 43. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 6  | 
                        NIA, p. 2. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 7  | 
                        NIA, p. 2. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 8  | 
                        Mrs Fatima Beattie, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 44. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 9  | 
                        NIA, p. 3. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 10  | 
                        Mrs Fatima Beattie, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 44. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 11  | 
                        NIA, p. 3. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 12  | 
                        NIA, p. 3. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 13  | 
                        NIA, p. 4. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 14  | 
                        Mrs Fatima Beattie, Transcript of Evidence, 22 June 2007, p. 44. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 15  | 
                        NIA, p. 4.  Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 16 | 
                        NIA, p. 5. Back |