Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Customs Amendment (Anti-Dumping Commission)
Bill 2013
Introduced into the
House of Representatives on 6 February 2013
Portfolio: Home Affairs
Summary of committee
view
1.1
The
committee seeks clarification as
to whether the relevant existing powers in Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901,
which are to be conferred on the proposed new Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping
Commission, are compatible with human rights.
1.2
The
committee seeks clarification as to whether provisions which give the Minister the power to
terminate the appointment of a part-time Commissioner, if of the opinion that
the Commissioner's outside work may conflict with the Commissioner's duties,
are compatible with the right to work and the right to a fair hearing.
Overview
1.3
This
bill seeks to amend the Customs Act 1901 to establish a new Anti-Dumping
Commission and Commissioner within the Australian Customs and Border Protection
Services. The bill gives the Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping Commission all of
the powers currently available under the Customs Act 1901, particularly
Part XVB which deals with the taking of anti-dumping measures. It sets out
procedures for the appointment of the Commissioner, the Commissioner's terms
and conditions, methods for termination of the appointment of the Commissioner
etc. The bill also amends a number of other Acts[1]
to make reference to the new Commissioner.
Compatibility
with human rights
1.4
The bill is
accompanied by a self-contained statement of compatibility. The statement
notes:
The Bill
does not raise any human rights issues. No new powers, functions or duties will
be imposed on the Commission or the Commissioner by this legislation. Instead,
existing legislative powers contained in Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901 will
be transferred from the CEO to the Commissioner.[2]
1.5
The purpose of
the bill is to establish the Anti-Dumping Commission within the Australian
Customs and Border Protection Service. The Commission will consist of the
Anti-Dumping Commissioner and staff assisting the Commissioner (to be made
available by the CEO of Customs). The Commissioner is to be given the existing
powers and functions of the CEO of Customs which relate to anti-dumping
matters. These are contained in Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901.
1.6
In general terms
the purpose of Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901 is to establish the
framework for:
the taking
of anti-dumping measures in respect of goods whose importation into Australia
involves a dumping or countervailable subsidisation of those goods that
injures, or threatens to injure, Australian industry. Those measures might
consist of the publication of a dumping duty notice or a countervailing duty
notice or the acceptance of an undertaking on conditions that make it
unnecessary to publish such a notice.[3]
Powers
in existing legislation
1.7
The committee
notes, as it has previously, that where an amending Act incorporates by
reference the provisions of an existing enactment or introduces a new
office-holder into the scheme of an Act who is to exercise powers under that
Act, the statement of compatibility should include an analysis of the human
rights implications and compatibility of the provisions of that enactment as
they are applied or extended by the amendment. This is so, even where the Act being
amended or incorporated by reference commenced operation before the
commencement of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
1.8
In this case the
statement of compatibility should have provided an analysis of the existing
powers in Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901 insofar as these are to be
conferred on the new Commissioner of the Anti-Dumping Commission which is to be
established by the bill.
1.9
For example, if
a notice is published, that may lead to the imposition of the liability to pay
a special customs duty on the importation of those goods into Australia. These
existing provisions in the Customs Act 1901 may engage the right to a
fair hearing under article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) insofar as the imposition of a special customs duty is
concerned.
1.10
The
committee intends to write to the Minister to seek clarification as to whether
the relevant existing powers in Part XVB of the Customs Act 1901 are
compatible with human rights.
Right
not to be subject to arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy
1.11
Proposed new
section 269SML requires the Commissioner to give written notice to the Minister
disclosing 'all
interests, pecuniary or
otherwise, that the Commissioner has or acquires and that conflict or could
conflict with the proper performance of the Commissioner’s functions.'
1.12
This
requirement appears to engage the right to privacy under article 17 of the
ICCPR, but the committee considers that, as the duty of disclosure is limited
to disclosure of interests relating to the proper performance of the duties of
the office, it appears to be a reasonable and proportionate limit of the
enjoyment of the right to privacy.
Right
to work
1.13
Article
6 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
provides that everyone has the right to work, including the 'opportunity to
gain his living by work which he freely chooses or accepts'. Proposed new subsection
269SMM(1) provides that if a Commissioner
is employed on a full-time basis, 'he or she must not engage in paid employment
outside the duties of his or her office without the Minister’s approval.' Proposed
new subsection 269SMM(2) provides that if the Commissioner is appointed on a
part-time basis, he or she must not engage in any paid employment that 'in the
Minister's opinion, conflicts or may conflict with the proper performance of
his or her duties'. Proposed new subparagraphs 269SMO(2)(d) and (e) provide
that the Commissioner's appointment may be terminated by the Minister if the Commissioner,
appointed on a full time basis, engages in work without approval, or, if
appointed on a part-time basis, engages in paid employment that in the
Minister's opinion conflicts with the proper performance of duties.
1.14
The committee
considers that proposed new subsection 269SMM(2) and subparagraph 269SMO(2)(e),
which allow a part-time Commissioner's appointment to be terminated if he or
she engages in paid employment that may conflict with the proper performance of
his or her duties engages the right to work. Under the provisions as currently
drafted there is no requirement for the part-time Commissioner to seek the
Minister's approval for paid work, so it is not clear that the part-time
Commissioner will know what the Minister's opinion is of the work he or she is
undertaking. This would enable the Minister to terminate the appointment of a
part-time Commissioner on the basis of other work the Commissioner is
undertaking, despite the Commissioner not being aware (as it rests solely on
the Minister's opinion) that this outside work was considered objectionable.
There is nothing in the bill that provides for merits review of the Minister's
decision to terminate the appointment, which would appear to engage article
14(1) of the ICCPR, the right to a fair hearing.
1.15
The
committee considers that proposed new subsection 269SMM(1) and subparagraph 269SMO(2)(d)
appear to limit the right to work, but in the context of the bill which creates
the office of Commissioner as a full-time position, this restriction can be
viewed as a reasonable and proportionate limitation on that right.
1.16
The committee intends to write to the Minister to seek
clarification as to whether proposed
new subsection 269SMM(2) and subparagraph 269SMO(2)(e) are compatible with
the right to work and the right to a fair hearing, as it gives the Minister the
power to terminate the appointment of a part-time Commissioner on the basis of
the Minister's opinion which may, or may not, have been known to the
Commissioner prior to termination of the appointment.
Navigation: Previous Page | Contents | Next Page
Top
|