Introduction | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.1 | 
                        On 18 October 2006 Australia signed the Agreement on Scientific and Technological  Cooperation between the Government of Australia and the Government of the  Republic of South Africa (the Agreement).1 Australia  has the same type of agreement with a number of other countries.2                           
                           | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.2 | 
                        Australia  and South Africa  have had a good long term collaborative research relationship participated in  by government agencies, universities and their industry sectors.3  
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.3 | 
                        The purpose of this Agreement is to further  support, strengthen and encourage the long standing scientific and  technological relationship that exists between Australia and the Republic of South Africa  by providing a more formal framework in which this cooperation can operate.4 
                            | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Background  | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.4 | 
                        South Africa is Australia’s most important  trading partner on the African continent with a two-way merchandise trade  (almost A$3.9 billion in 2006) accounting for almost 75% of Australia’s two way  trade with sub-Saharan Africa.5 The total value of Australian mining investment in Africa  is estimated at $14 billion and involves over 1400 companies in various  capacities.6 
                           | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.5 | 
                        The focus of scientific and technological  cooperation between Australia  and South Africa  has, in recent years, been in the areas of mining exploration and processing  and associated environmental management; natural resource management,  especially water; catchment management; biological control of invasive species;  and agriculture.7 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.6  | 
                        Current Australian collaboration with South Africa  includes activities in the areas of astronomy, natural resource management,  minerals and mining. The range of fields in which there are existing scientific  interactions between the two countries suggests that there is potential to  expand the relationship and increase scientific benefits and linkages between  both countries.  Currently, the CSIRO,  which has strong linkages with research institutions in South Africa, is  interested in cooperation in radio astronomy and, within the energy domain, in  areas such as coal liquefaction.8 
                            | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        The purpose of the agreement | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.7 | 
                        A more formal agreement on scientific and technological  cooperation with South    Africa is required to enable South Africa’s  National Research Foundation to provide greater resources to support  collaborative activities. At the present time, only  limited resources are able to be committed by South Africa.9  
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.8 | 
                        The Australian Government has been advised by  Australian research institutions 
                          that although the South African Government had money they  could make available for their researchers …it was locked up until the  governments had a treaty level instrument that gave legitimacy to subsequent  research relationships.10 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.9 | 
                        The Agreement between Australia and South Africa should  resolve this impediment, potentially allowing agencies to undertake new  collaborative research.11 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.10 | 
                        The Committee was also informed by the Department  of Education, Science and Training (DEST) that the Agreement will provide: 
   Guidance on the type  of collaborative activities that the Australian and South African governments  may wish to encourage, such as the exchange of scientists, research workers,  specialists and scholars, the organisation of bilateral scientific and technological  seminars and courses, and the formulation, implementation and application of  joint research.12 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.11 | 
                        It will also allow for dialogue between the  governments of Australia  and South Africa  to ensure the cooperation is directed towards the areas of greatest mutual  benefit.13 
                            | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Obligations | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.12 | 
                        The main obligations of Parties as outlined in  the NIA to the agreement will be: 
                      - Article 1(1) and 1(2) obliges the Parties to  promote the development of cooperation in the fields of science and technology  on the basis of equality and mutual advantages and to promote scientific and  technological cooperation between their respective government agencies,  enterprises, research institutions, universities and other research and  development organisations.
 
                       - Article 2 obliges the Parties to conduct their  scientific and technological cooperation subject to the domestic law of the  countries of the Parties, and effected by the:
                       - exchange of scientists, research workers,  specialists, and scholars;
 
                       - exchange of scientific and technological information  and documentation;
 
                       - organisation of bilateral scientific and  technological seminars and courses in areas of mutual interest; and
 
                      - joint identification of scientific and  technological problems, the formulation and implementation of joint research programmes,  the application of the results of such research in industry, agriculture and  other fields, and the exchange of experience and know-how resulting from this  work.
  
                        - Article 3 obliges the Parties to facilitate the  entry and stay of the other Party’s citizens in its country for the purposes of  this Agreement.
 
                       - Article 4 provides that the Parties may  negotiate and conclude arrangements for the effective implementation or  operation of any aspect of the Agreement.
 
                       - Article 4(4) obliges the Parties to take into  account the applicable domestic law of the country of the Party in whose  jurisdiction the particular cooperative activities are to be undertaken.
 
                      - Article 4(5) obliges the Parties, unless they  otherwise agree, to conclude programs of cooperation, compiled biennially or in  another agreed period, setting out the details of cooperative activities.
 
                      - Article 6 obliges the Parties to agree upon the  terms and delivery of the equipment and apparatus required for joint research  and pilot plant studies.
 
                     - Article 7 obliges the Parties to promote  cooperation in the exchange of information.
 
                      - Article 8 obliges a Party not to divulge  confidential information obtained from the other Party unless the other Party  consents to disclosure or requires its disclosure under its domestic law and  has informed the other party in writing of this obligation.
 
                      - Article 9 obliges the Parties to settle  financial arrangements involved in the implementation of this Agreement, in  respect of the programmes of cooperation.
 
- Article  10 obliges the Parties to afford to the citizens of the other Party  all reasonable assistance and facilities in carrying out activities under this  Agreement.
 
                      - Article 11 obliges the Parties to settle any  disputes between them arising out of the interpretation or implementation of  the Agreement amicably through consultation or negotiation.14 
  
                            | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Entry into force and withdrawal | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.13 | 
                        Article 12 of the Agreement provides that the  Parties shall notify each other when their domestic requirements for entry into  force of the Agreement have been fulfilled.15 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.14 | 
                        The NIA states that no new domestic legislation  or amendments to existing legislation are required to allow Australia to  meet its obligations under the Agreement. In addition: 
                        - under Article 13 of the Agreement, amendments  can be made by an exchange of notes between both Parties through diplomatic  channels; and,16
 
                      - once in force, Article 12(3) of the Agreement  allows either Party to terminate the Agreement upon six weeks’ written notice.  Cooperative activities under the Agreement which had commenced as at the date  of receipt of a notification to terminate the Agreement would be allowed to be  fully executed after the termination has taken effect. Termination by Australia would  be subject to our domestic treaty-making process.17
  
                           | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Consultation  | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.15 | 
                        The NIA states that: 
                        - the Federal Government Departments were  consulted and all agencies were broadly supportive of the Agreement;
 
                        - during 2005, the views of stakeholder agencies  were also sought on the suitability of the text agreed with South Africa at  an officials level;18
 
                         - State and Territory Governments were consulted through  the Commonwealth and State/Territory Standing Committee on Treaties (SCOT) and  indicated no objections or concerns;
 
                       - approval for Australia to sign the Agreement in  October 2006 was received from the Prime Minister and relevant Government  Ministers; and,
 
                        - the Australian scientific community was consulted,  specifically through the Australian Research Council (ARC), the National Health  and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology  Organisation (ANSTO), Defence Science Technology Organisation (DSTO) and the  CSIRO.  All agencies indicated their  support for the provisions.19
  
                           | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.16 | 
                        The Committee questioned DEST in regards to the  use of the term ‘broadly supportive’ in relation to the consultative process.  DEST stated that: 
                          I think it is a rare case where you will find every agency  has a complete 100 per cent endorsement of the text in its first iteration. So  ‘broadly supportive’ is intended to encompass the situation where we did speak  to all agencies and through a process of discussion and some modification of  the text  we picked up on their initial  reservations and they were subsequently happy with the text and signed it off.20 
                            | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Costs | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.17 | 
                        The NIA states that while there will be some  costs associated with implementation and management of the proposed Agreement,  these costs will be absorbed by DEST. No additional costs are anticipated as a  consequence of this treaty action.      | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.18 | 
                        On the issue of funding DEST explained that: 
                          There is no dedicated Australian government funding that will  foster research collaborations, particularly under this relationship. We expect  the Australian research entities who are interested in collaborations to  identify funding through available resources and then set up collaborative  dialogue with their South African partners, who will now have a greater ability  to access funding to support their researchers.21 
                            | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Other matters | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.19 | 
                        The Committee was interested in opportunities  that may be presented for collaboration between Australia and South Africa in  cereals and plant biotechnology. A DEST representative stated that although he  could not provide specifics on this: 
                          The purpose of the agreement is to set up an enabling  framework that will allow collaborations where there is mutual potential  benefit between Australian research institutions and South African institutions  to then set up collaborative dialogue and subsequently research engagement.22 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.20 | 
                        The Committee questioned DEST in relation to  intellectual property (IP) protection. The Committee was told: 
                          [t]his treaty was developed with the intention of opening up  a mechanism that allowed….access to unrealised South African research funding.  As a result of that, there was no set of pressing issues that needed to be addressed  by either party in terms of setting up detailed prescriptive frameworks for the  management of IP relationships in the research collaborations that take place  under the treaty.23 
                            | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.21 | 
                        There is no clear expectation on how much research  is likely to be conducted in Australia  or in South Africa.24 The CSIRO stated that : 
                          In some cases a project may be done primarily in one country  or the other depending on what it is that the projects team is looking to  investigate and what facilities and infrastructure it needs to do that.  Equally, there are some projects where it is split between them, and the  Australian researchers, for example, may do the majority of their work in  Australia and the South African or whoever may do the majority of their work in  their country.25 
                           | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.22 | 
                        The Committee questioned representatives from DEST  whether South African funding would be specifically linked to research located in  South Africa.  A representative from DEST stated that he was not ‘100 per cent clear in terms  of the details of how the funding would be allocated to each project’26 The representative from DEST further stated: 
                          What generally happens though with research collaborations is  that the Australian funding source we use supports the activities of the  Australian researchers… The other country would pick up the cost of their own  nationals, typically, and over the course of the entire project you would  usually find a good split where Australia’s  nationals are supported by Australian dollars and, in this instance, South  African nationals would be supported by South African funding support.27 
                           | 
                      
                      
                         | 
                          | 
                      
                      
                        Conclusion and recommendations | 
                      
                      
                        | 3.23 | 
                        The Committee accepts that the Agreement between  Australia  and the Republic   of South Africa would  further support, strengthen and encourage the long standing scientific and  technological relationship that exists between Australia and the Republic of South Africa  by providing a more formal framework in which this arrangement can operate.  | 
                      
                      
                        |   | 
                        Recommendation 2The Committee supports the Agreement on Scientific and Technological Cooperation between Australia and  the Republic of South Africa and recommends that  binding treaty action be taken.  | 
                      
                    
                    
                      
                        | 1  | 
                        National Interest Analysis (NIA), para. 1. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 2  | 
                        Australia has similar agreements  with China,  the European Community,  the Federal  Republic of Germany, Japan,  the Republic of Korea,  the Government of Russia, the Republic   of Indonesia, and the United States of America. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 3  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 17. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 4  | 
                        NIA, para. 3. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 5  | 
                        Australia’s merchandise exports to South Africa  are dominated by raw materials (alumina, coal and crude petroleum). Australia’s  investment in South Africa,  and Southern Africa more broadly, is  predominantly in mining. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 6  | 
                        NIA, para. 8.  Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 7  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 18. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 8  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 18. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 9  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 19. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 10  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript of Evidence, 18   June 2007, p. 19 Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 11  | 
                        NIA, Consultation, para.  6. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 12  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 18. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 13  | 
                        Mr David   Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 18. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 14  | 
                        NIA, paras. 11-22. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 15  | 
                        NIA, para. 2. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 16  | 
                        Any amendment to the Agreement would be  subject to Australia’s  domestic treaty-making process, NIA, para. 26. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 17  | 
                        NIA, para. 27. Back     | 
                      
                      
                        | 18  | 
                        A number of agencies raised matters  concerning treaty language which then became the subject of further  consideration and negotiation with South Africa. The draft text was  subsequently amended to satisfy these concerns. NIA, Consultation, para. 3. Back    | 
                      
                      
                        | 19  | 
                        NIA, Consultation, paras. 1-8. Back  | 
                      
                      
                        | 20  | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 20. Back  | 
                      
                      
                        | 21 | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 19. Back  | 
                      
                      
                        | 22 | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 18. Back  | 
                      
                      
                        | 23 | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 19. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 24 | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 19.  Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 25 | 
                        Miss Kimberly  Shrives, Transcript of Evidence, 18 June 2007, p. 19-20. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 26 | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript  of Evidence, 18 June   2007, p. 20. Back | 
                      
                      
                        | 27 | 
                        Mr David Smith, Transcript of Evidence, 18   June 2007, p. 20. Back |