Standing Committee on Employment, Education 
        and Workplace Relations 
      
      This document has been scanned from the original printed submission. 
        It may contain some errors 
      
Submission 91
      Submission by:
        Ron Seidel
        Executive Manager
        Faculty of Engineering
        Regency Institute
        Days Road
        REGENCY PARK SA 5010
      8 January 1998
      Summary
      It is contended that Australia is a country with considerable geographic, 
        economic and cultural diversity, and requires a flexible approach to the 
        provision of education and training services. The basic task before educational 
        institutions is the same, though the basis on which they carry out this 
        task will vary between institutions and within institutions, largely affected 
        by historical development, current capabilities, local or regional needs 
        and available resources.
      Universities and TAFE institutes are perceived to being on a multi parameter 
        continuum, and while there may be clear functional differences between 
        universities in general and TAFE Institutes in general, there will be 
        overlap in specific cases. This overlap should give little concern provided 
        that it is not dysfunctional to the effective provision of educational 
        services to the people of Australia. It is suggested that universities, 
        TAFE institutes and other providers be seen as a system of education and 
        training providers working together to meet the educational needs of all 
        Australians. This multi dimensional collaborative model should also provide 
        competitive advantage in the export of education and training services. 
        To impose a single model of a university and of a TAFE institute would 
        not recognise the diversity of Australia, and would not contribute to 
        the developmental needs of this country.
      Introduction
      Regency Institute of TAFE is a major provider of vocational education 
        and training in engineering, information technology, hospitality, community 
        services and business services in South Australia. The Faculty of Engineering 
        has approximately 200 teaching staff, offering courses from introductory 
        to Advanced Diploma, and collaborates with the three universities in South 
        Australia to offer a 5 year undergraduate M Eng (IT&T) and other programs. 
        It is expected that a three year degree in Engineering Technology will 
        be introduced in the near future. Award courses are conducted overseas 
        under franchise arrangements. Regency Institute a joint owner with the 
        three universities in South Australia of the Australian Information Technology 
        Engineering Centre.
      The author holds a degree in engineering and post graduate qualifications 
        in computer science and education, and has had over 30 years experience 
        in teaching in TAFE and in educational management. The author has had 
        the opportunity to compare the development of vocational education and 
        training in Australia to that in a number of other countries and has presented 
        papers in the area.
      This is an individual Submission and need not reflect the views of Regency 
        Institute or TAFE SA.
      Submission 
      
        
1. The task before all educational institutions is essentially the 
          same, namely: 
        
          - conduct learning programs that are 
              -  educationally and technically (discipline wise) credible
-  ethical
 
- to use the communitys resources efficiently and effectively.
        2. Debate on roles 
        
The role of schools and universities have been debated for centuries. 
          but this is not true for institutes of vocational education and training. 
          and in particular TAFE institutes. It will probably be some time before 
          the debate in Australia on the role and practices of TAFE institutes 
          can reach the level of the debate surrounding schools and universities. 
          There are organisations elsewhere which have an established capability 
          to research and debate issues relating to vocational education and training, 
          for example the Bundesunstitut fur Berufsbildung (BiBB) in Germany.
        The debate about schools and universities has been 
          in both academic circles and the informed press, for example, the Economist 
          of October 4 1997 (Economist, Vol 345, no 8037, 4-10 October, insert) 
          had an interesting article summarising a number of issues regarding 
          the development and contemporary role of universities.
        The roles of the various entities within education are constantly changing 
          in response to prevailing educational philosophy and practice, and to 
          social, political and economic influences. These influences are often 
          in conflict with each other.
        With the internationalisation of commerce and education, Australia 
          needs to be adequately consistent with the educational structures and 
          practices of other countries so that it can easily share learning resources, 
          and academic debate and intellectual development.
        3. Physical and functional traits 
        
        
It is necessary to differentiate between the physical existence of 
          an educational Organisation and its functions.
        An educational Organisation may be a 'university' in name but may offer 
          many programs that are not consistent with an accepted educational context 
          of a university and yet this may be in the best interests of the community. 
          Many universities around the world offer programs which in the Australian 
          context are clearly in the TAFE sector, for example universities in 
          the Scandinavian countries and in South East Asia. While TAFE institutes 
          are well established in Australia and their equivalent in some other 
          countries, a system of unique vocational education and training institutions 
          is not a feature of all countries. 
        4. Education and training
        It has some times been claimed that universities are 
          concerned with education and TAFE institutes with training, or is has 
          been implied that education is of general nature and training is of 
          a specific (vocational) nature.
        Probably a more useful concept is to see education and training as 
          complementary learning processes whereby information, gained through 
          any of a number of mechanisms, is internalised as knowledge with skills 
          being the outward manifestation of the knowledge. Education is a divergent 
          learning process whereby people maximise their individual differences 
          and the learning outcomes for different people in the same learning 
          environment will be quite different. Education can lead to innovation, 
          process improvement and a high level of problem solving capability because 
          it encourages the exploration of alternative ideas unconstrained by 
          current thinking. Training on the other hand is a convergent learning 
          process whereby the effect of individual differences is minimised and 
          learning constrained to essentially the same learning outcomes for all 
          students. Training will tend to lead to professionally and socially 
          accepted outcomes, but tends to entrench current practice. Education 
          and training are complementary learning processes. both are 'right' 
          and both are necessary. One might hope that a surgeon is properly trained 
          to carry out a complex operation but equally hope that the person has 
          been at the same time educated to perceive improved medical procedures.
        It is noted that many universities are introducing work/industrial 
          experience. cooperative levitating and other learning environments to 
          provide students with some skills to be able to do it, essentially 
          training, while TAFE institutes are (or will need to) increase the level 
          of education in their course offerings to counter the rapidly changing 
          nature of work and jobs.
        While universities in general may concentrate more on education than 
          training, and TAFE institutes more on training than education. the education-training 
          parameter is not all adequate differentiator between the functions of 
          universities and TAFE institutes.
        5. Academic standards
        Academic standards are indicated by the level routine processes and 
          repetition on the one hand and the level of hypothesis, analysis and 
          synthesis on the other. Study that requires a high level of hypothesis, 
          analysis and synthesis would be considered to be at a higher academic 
          level than study which involves well established knowledge routine processes 
          and repetition.
        Some degree courses and even some post graduate courses offered by 
          universities have quite low demands for hypothesis, analysis and synthesis, 
          and are often comparable with or even below that expected in some courses 
          in TAFE institutes. While in general universities work at a higher academic 
          level than TAFE institutes this parameter alone is not a sufficient 
          differentiator of function and role.
        6. Research
        Universities are a major research agency in Australia and part of the 
          funding that they received is based on this function. The research traditionally 
          has tended to be leading edge though there have always been valuable 
          components of applied research. It is suspected that because of economic 
          pressures and sponsorship the ratio of leading edge to applied research 
          is changing. Universities around the world are often differentiated 
          by their research priorities and achievements. In many areas, but certainly 
          not all, teaching is based on research experiences and outcomes.
        TAFE institutes have no tradition of research, either leading edge 
          or applied, even though there are good opportunities for research into 
          technology development and educational practice and which would contribute 
          to the intellectual capability of Australia. There are a number of factors 
          currently n-mitigating against the development of a research culture 
          in TAFE institutes, for example, misconceptions about the nature and 
          processes of research, senior management with no empathy for research, 
          the pressure for productivity and the constraints of national curriculum.
        A research capability in TAFE institutes would enhance the learning 
          environment for students and provide professional diversity for staff, 
          and will become increasingly important given the rapid changes in technology 
          and the evolution of work practices. Teaching staff in TAFE institutes 
          need to be mentored in research processes. An example of such research 
          is the recent project completed by the Faculty of Engineering at Regency 
          Institute, A Cultural Context for the Development of Career Entry 
          Technical Training for Aboriginal People. The research findings 
          have been internationally recognised and have resulted in successful 
          pilot programs for Aboriginal people.
        The role of research and its consequential effect on teaching is a 
          functional differentiator between universities and TAFE institutes.
        7. Vocational education and training
        Vocational education and training occurs in both universities and TAFE 
          institutes, and perhaps even to a similar extent.
        In universities, courses in engineering, law, medicine and accountancy, 
          for example have very strong vocational components. and if anything 
          these vocational components are being strengthened as the competition 
          by graduates for jobs increases. It is probably the case that in TAFE 
          Institutes the vocational outcomes are more applicable in the short 
          term than in universities though it is suggested that the strengthening 
          of the vocational outcomes in university courses is in terms of immediately 
          applicable (short term) competencies.
        Universities also offer courses that do not have such strong direct 
          vocational outcomes. for example in file humanities and the liberal 
          arts, and in no way is it suggested that such courses are not valuable 
          and do not contribute to the capability of the community. Graduates 
          of such courses may develop careers well removed from their field of 
          study and often bring all alternative and valuable perspective to the 
          work environment. There is no large scale equivalent in TAFE Institutes 
          in Australia at the present time, though the General National Vocational 
          Qualifications (GNVQs) in technical colleges in England are largely 
          general in nature; a general education film a vocational flavour but 
          not work place specific.
        It is strongly suggested that there is a gap in education and training 
          provision in Australia. There is a large number of school leavers for 
          whom immediate employment is not likely and yet who do not have available 
          to them appropriate education services. Universities are not an option 
          for these young people because of their school achievement and TAFE 
          courses, through national curriculum developments, have become intrinsically 
          linked to the immediate workplace. There is an immediate need for suitable 
          study programs for the young otherwise unemployed and it is suggested 
          that such programs should have a strong educational component and be 
          less concerned about specific job training as has been common practice 
          in the past. The rapid adoption in less than 5 years of the GNVQs in 
          England which provide learning opportunities for this group of (usually) 
          young people should be carefully noted. It is of interest that some 
          50% of university entrants in England now come from the GNVQ stream 
          rather than from the school A level stream.
        Both universities and TAFE institutes have (or should have) vocational 
          and general education components and the relative proportion of the 
          vocational and general components are likely to be of the same order. 
          The roles of universities and TAFE institutes probably cannot be adequately 
          differentiated on the general vocational parameter.
        8. Community needs
        There is an expectation that the educational needs of a community whether 
          it be in the central business district of a large city or in remote 
          Australia will be met as far as is possible. Economic constraints will 
          determine the range of educational services available, but whether these 
          services are provided by a university, a TAFE institute, a school, a 
          private provider, some community agency or some of these in collaboration 
          is not of primary importance. It is quite a realistic expectation that 
          students in a remote town, perhaps Ceduna in South Australia, should 
          be able to enrol for a university degree course, say Bachelor of Arts 
          or a Bachelor of Business, and be able to study some subjects locally, 
          perhaps organised and delivered through the local TAFE campus using 
          whatever technology is available. Obviously the study must be credible 
          but this does not mean that it has to be the same as that available 
          on-campus in some metropolitan university. There are many examples in 
          Australia of such collaborations to meet community needs and these initiatives 
          should be applauded and become an accepted process.
         
        9. Collaboration
        The collaboration between schools, TAFE institutes and universities 
          has been increasing in recent years in particular in regional Australia 
          and the smaller cities, in part in response to the decreasing number 
          of students and reducing resources. There appears to be a number of 
          conditions that need to be satisfied for successful collaboration, for 
          example:
         
          -  there needs to be a good, specific reason to collaborate
-  the collaboration needs to be consistent with each partner's strategic 
            development
-  the collaborating partners need to be easily identified
-  the collaborating partners need to have established credibility 
            and status
-  the collaborating partners need to have a relatively common educational 
            philosophy
-  the collaboration needs to be sustainable
-  resources are needed to maintain the collaboration
-  the effect of competition between the partners needs to be recognised 
            and managed
Collaborations can be both informal and formal. Informal collaborations 
          may involve sharing ideas. joint activities such as Summer Schools and 
          school promotion. sharing (including cost recovery) intellectual properly 
          and physical resources. and in particular mutual respect and support. 
          Formal collaborations may be agreements and contracts.
        It is suggested that specific purpose collaborations are likely to 
          be more productive than some form of general collaboration. 
        Obviously in the present environment collaborating partners need to 
          recognise and manage competition between them selves. It is contended 
          that if the environment is essentially competition driven then any collaboration 
          will be marginal. Educational organisations should appreciate that in 
          spite of increasing consultancy and other income generating activities, 
          that they essentially community resource based and that the community 
          expects that they will use those resources efficiently and effectively 
          to the benefit of the community.
        It is suggested that examples of successful collaborations are those 
          between Regency Institute and the University of Adelaide on their Graduate 
          Entrepreneurial Initiative (an informal collaboration) and between Regency 
          Institute, the University of Adelaide, the University of South Australia 
          and the Flinders University on the Australian Information Technology 
          Engineering Centre.
        10. Access
        Just as universities have some unique roles, so do TAFE institutes 
          and one of these roles is the provision of flexible access programs 
          for those students who for what ever reason have limited educational 
          achievement or who are new to this country. Often these participants 
          have had negative learning experiences and low self esteem and this 
          can strongly influence their personal lives and their performance at 
          work. Many, with encouragement, mentoring and sensitive, realistic counselling 
          can achieve significant milestones, not just raising the option of higher 
          study but enhanced work opportunities and better family relationships. 
          This country cannot afford the luxury of not effectively developing 
          and using all the human resource potential available.
        11. Culture
        There are differences in the culture of universities and TAFE institutes. 
          Universities have a history back to the 12th century if not earlier 
          and are found in most countries of the world. TAFE institutes are a 
          relatively new development and while relatively well established in 
          Australia and the equivalent in some other countries, are by no means 
          universal.
        The old well established universities, the newer universities (ex CAEs 
          etc), large metropolitan TAFE institutes and regional TAFE institutes 
          all have different profiles and culture brought about by traditions, 
          funding sources, administrative procedures, staff capabilities, facilities, 
          and community needs. There will generally be a clear difference in the 
          culture and role of the well established central business district universities 
          and regional TAFE institutes, but the differences will be much less 
          between the established universities and the newer universities, or 
          between the newer universities and the large metropolitan TAFE institutes.
        Some institutions because of their specialisation may need to serve 
          the educational needs of a whole state or perhaps all of Australia, 
          whereas others might be more concerned to properly address the educational 
          needs of their geographic region. University A in geographic region 
          Y could well have some educational service the same as in TAFE institute 
          B in geographic region Z. However one would need to at least question 
          the efficiency of more than one institution in the same geographic region 
          offering comparable study programs.
        It is not an issue that an institution with a particular profile is 
          preferred to another, or that one is better than another, but rather 
          that all are working together in some form of collaboration to efficiently 
          and effectively serve the educational needs of the country. Diversity 
          and flexibility in educational provision is necessary to serve diverse 
          Australia.
        12. Conclusion
        Australia is a diverse country with diverse education and training 
          needs. It is contended that the tasks of educational institutions whether 
          universities or TAFE institutes is the same; educational credibility 
          and effectiveness.
        Universities and TAFE institutes share many common traits and few parameters 
          are exclusively the domain of a particular education sector. There is 
          no clear cut division between universities and TAFE institutes, nor 
          should there be as this would most likely. be dysfunctional to the provision 
          of educational services to all of Australia.
        Universities have teaching that is more research based, more academically 
          demanding and less oriented to short term vocational outcomes than TAFE 
          institutes. TAFE institutes have teaching that accommodates diverse 
          student backgrounds and 'second chancers', are more flexible in educational 
          provision and more oriented to short term learning goals. Some study 
          programs are clearly the province of universities and some clearly the 
          province of TAFE institutes, and there are many that might be offered 
          by either, not on the basis of competition but for efficiency and regional 
          educational needs. Universities and TAFE institutes are complementary 
          and together must ensure that the educational needs of the community 
          are met.
      
      
Back to top