Standing Committee on Employment, Education 
        and Workplace Relations 
      
      This document has been scanned from the original printed submission. 
        It may contain some errors 
      
Submission 16
      Royal Australian Planning Institute
       
      
      The Royal Australian Planning Institute (RAPI) is the only national association 
        representing the professional interests of land-use planners in Australia. 
        Our members are employed in a very wide range of fields including urban 
        design, social planning, environmental management, economic planning and 
        development, regional planning and transport planning. The employment 
        market for planners includes all three levels of government the private 
        sector and academia.
      Surveys undertaken by course providers indicate that there is a continuing 
        demand for planners in Australia especially in state government, local 
        government and the private sector. The rapid urbanisation of the Asia-Pacific 
        region has also created a demand for planning training. Many Asian countries 
        look to Australia's higher education courses on urban and regional planning 
        and urban management because Australia has a reputation for providing 
        good programs. Currently, AusAID funds 140 students from developing countries 
        to study urban planning at Australian education institutions.
      The range of skills and expertise required by planners are diverse. Currently, 
        planning education equips students with the capacity to
      
        • Identify and understand the nature of the planning problem or opportunity 
          before them from a range of market and non-market perspectives;
        • Assess whether there are alternative ways to present a response to 
          the affected or benefiting parties;
        • Understand the application of economic and / or legal instruments 
          in order to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects;
        • Present creative ideas which people can build on;
        • Market themselves and their ideas; and
        
      
With this expertise graduates are now obtaining employment in a range 
        of sectors such as health, education, welfare, transport and environmental 
        planning as well as in the more traditional urban rural and regional planning 
        fields. The rise of environmental concerns worldwide has created a new 
        area of expertise which planners have incorporated in to their responsibilities. 
        This has required a greater degree of scientific, legal and ethical understanding 
        and knowledge.
      RAPI would like to make the following comments regarding the specific 
        terms of reference as they relate to the planning profession in Australia.
       
      
1 "The appropriate roles of the institutes of technical and further 
        education"
      Planning professionals are required to make or provide advice on decisions 
        which include considered value judgements, not merely to apply a code 
        to a proposal. There is a general distinction that universities provide 
        broader professional education including values and philosophies whereas 
        TAFE institutions primarily provide training at a technical level.
      RAPI believes that there is a role for both professionals and technicians 
        in the wide range of planning-related activities which our members are 
        involved in. However, it is our view that the universities provide the 
        education in complex knowledge, skills and values to satisfy the qualitative 
        and quantitative judgement, legal and administrative responsibilities 
        of a planner. In addition, a high level of conceptualisation and strategic 
        thinking is required. At RAPI's appearance before the West Committee, 
        the committee indicated a view that the role of TAFE institutions is to 
        provide training rather than education.
      RAPI accepts as full Corporate Members planners without recognised planning 
        degrees only after they have had lengthy periods of appropriate and skilled 
        work experience. This differentiation arose because, historically, the 
        planning profession was more narrowly defined as land use planning and 
        university qualifications in planning were not readily available around 
        Australia.
      The TAFE institutions initially presented cartography and town planning 
        draughting diplomas. The Royal Australian Planning Institute participated 
        in advisory committees for these courses. Approximately ten years ago, 
        these courses were amalgamated with drafting course for other disciplines, 
        principally architectural draughting. More recently, the amalgamated courses 
        have been replaced in some states and the Northern Territory by the National 
        Architectural and Building Technology Curriculum.
      The vocational educational and training roles of the TAFE institutions 
        should be reinforced by focus on the appropriate core skills and the work 
        place competency for those skills.
      There could be better articulation between the vocational education and 
        training (VET) sector and the university sector by adding some new developments 
        for the VET sector. An example would be allowing graduates of the VET 
        sector to be trained as planning technicians (two year diploma - Level 
        5 Australian Qualifications Framework) and planning paraprofessionals 
        (three year degree Level 6 Australian Qualification Framework).
      2 "The extent to which those roles should overlap with universities"
      Ideally, there should be no overlap between the TAFE sector and the universities 
        because this would lead to an inefficient use of scarce funds and human 
        resource for both the VET sector and the university sector. Nevertheless, 
        the increasing demand for articulation between these sectors has meant 
        that universities have recognised the attainment of certain relevant skills 
        by awarding partial advanced standing to VET graduates. As the comments 
        under point 1 argue, this does not mean that TAFE institutions should 
        offer the same courses as universities.
      The development of the new curriculum emphasising architectural and building 
        technology skills in the VET sector has made it difficult for the graduates 
        of the two year diploma to articulate with the four year degree (and four 
        year honours degree) and the two year postgraduate Masters Degree in the 
        university sector required for education as a professional planner. Where 
        someone is transferring to a planning degree at a university, the best 
        recognition of prior learning for a diploma is approximately twelve months.
      Graduates from the VET diploma and possibly degree (three year) programs 
        with appropriate articulation of curriculum, could be admitted to transfer 
        from VET to a four year university degree with recognition of prior learning 
        of from one year to 2 or 3 years. This would enable articulation (rather 
        than overlap) of education in a staged development moving from a technician 
        to a paraprofessional at the TAFE institution and then on to university 
        to complete the level of education required of a professional planner.
      RAPI would be pleased to make a presentation to the committee to expand 
        on these comments. General information about RAPI is enclosed for your 
        information.
      Yours sincerely,
      Sandra Vigar
      National President
      
      
Back to top