Standing Committee on Employment, Education 
        and Workplace Relations 
      
      This document has been scanned from the original printed submission. 
        It may contain some errors 
      
Submission 10
      KvB College of Visual Communication
      20 October 1997
      Re: Inquiry into the Approriate Use of Institutes of Technical and Further 
        Education
      Thank you for your letter of 19 September 1997 in which you invite a 
        submission from this college on the appropriate roles of institutes of 
        technical and further education; and the extent to which those roles should 
        overlap with universities.
      There are in fact two inter-related aspects on which we would like to 
        offer some comments, namely
      
        i) the complementary and supplementary roles of private providers of 
          technical and further education; and
        ii) colleges like KVB already have overlapping roles between 
          their Vocational
      
Education and Training courses and their Higher Education courses.
      Much discussion on the appropriate roles of institutes of technical and 
        further education focuses, by virtue of the title, on public institutions, 
        and yet there are many private institutions which offer a range of TAFE/VET 
        accredited courses. These tend to be in fields of practice which have 
        not historically been catered for in the public colleges, or in areas 
        where it is not always easy for public sector institutions to respond 
        to market forces.
      Private colleges are also often relatively small so that they can concentrate 
        on pastoral care and mentoring programs. Like the better public institutions 
        they also provide much of their instruction through the judicious selection 
        of the most able current practitioners of the professions and crafts in 
        question. This practice gives their programs characteristics of authenticity 
        and credibility in the eyes of industry and commerce. This standing is 
        enhanced when their students are able to share in the expertise of these 
        skilled professionals directly in the workplace through internship programs 
        where they have access to the most up-to-date equipment. In turn this 
        situation keeps the college up to the mark in terms of the equipment it 
        provides on campus.
      There are probably more differences among private VET providers than 
        between the private and public 'systems'. There is room for more cooperation 
        between the public and private sectors for the benefit of the students 
        and the communities we serve as well as to ensure that more than lip-service 
        is paid to the principle of competitive neutrality. An area where the 
        private sector is weakest is in staff development and this is perhaps 
        where public providers can assist. The relationship between TAFE institutes 
        (and all VET providers more generally) should be based on the notion 
        of a two-way continuum that leads ultimately to mature participation in 
        the workplace.
      Located in the middle of this continuum are the 'professional' disciplines 
        which straddle the overlap between VET and HE because of their reliance 
        on specialised skills acquisition applied in complex and non-routing contexts 
        such as Design and Visual Communication. These professional disciplines 
        are reliant on high quality training as well as intellectually 
        challenging education. They also rely on 'higher order' capabilities which 
        include, for instance, creativity (which is the stock in trade of designers).
      This college, like the best private providers of post-secondary education, 
        already has overlapping roles between its VET and HE courses through 
        an articulated suite of accredited award programs from certificate, through 
        diploma and advanced diploma, to a degree program. Thus all our students 
        are able to share in the best features of TAFE and university undergraduate 
        education. This rarely happens even at universities which have TAFE 
        divisions because of the hierarchical nature of their programs. The 
        issues that confuse the debate are the competition for resources and the 
        notion that the access to knowledge is sequential with VET on the 
        bottom and HE at the top, whereas they actually represent alternative 
        pathways which should be viewed as complementary and mutually supportive.
      
      
Back to top