Chapter 8

Conduct of proceedings

This chapter describes how the Senate conducts its business once it has met, and how the business to be dealt with is determined.

Quorum

Section 22 of the Constitution provides:

Until the Parliament otherwise provides, the presence of at least one-third of the whole number of the senators shall be necessary to constitute a meeting of the Senate for the exercise of its powers.

By the Senate (Quorum) Act 1991, which was introduced in accordance with a recommendation of the Senate Select Committee on Legislation Procedures in 1988, the quorum of the Senate was altered to one quarter of the senators, that is, 19 out of 76 senators.

The standing orders of the Senate contain provisions to ensure that a quorum is kept during a sitting of the Senate.

If a quorum is not present when the President takes the chair at the beginning of a sitting, the bells are rung for a further five minutes, and if a quorum is not then present, the President adjourns the Senate till the next sitting. A senator present at this time is not allowed to leave the chamber while a quorum is being formed.1

At any time during a sitting, a senator may draw attention to the lack of a quorum, and for that purpose may interrupt a senator who is speaking.2 The bells are then rung for four minutes, and if a quorum is still not present the President adjourns the Senate till the next sitting. The doors remain unlocked after the bells have been rung and when the senators are being counted. A senator who enters the chamber at that stage may be counted for the purpose of a quorum, but not one who enters after the President has finally declared that a quorum is not present.

If a division reveals that a quorum is not present, the President adjourns the Senate till the next sitting, and no decision is taken as a result of the division.3

If attention is drawn to the lack of a quorum in committee of the whole, and if a quorum is still not present after the bells have been rung for four minutes, or if a division in the committee reveals the lack of a quorum, the Chair of Committees leaves the chair and reports to the Senate.4 When that report is made the bells are rung for four minutes, and if a quorum is not then present the President adjourns the Senate till the next sitting day.5

A senator present in the chamber may not leave the chamber while a quorum is being formed.6 A senator who leaves or attempts to leave the chamber contrary to this standing order may be required by the chair to return.

If a quorum is called for when a senator is speaking, the time taken to form a quorum does not come out of the senator's speaking time. Nor does it reduce the time for a debate unless the Senate is operating under a limitation of debate under standing order 142.7

If the Senate is adjourned for lack of a quorum, which is called a “count-out”, the names of the senators present are recorded in the Journals.8

Occasionally it is suggested that the ability of a senator to call attention to the lack of a quorum should be restricted, because the frequent use of that procedure may disrupt the transaction of business. The requirement for a quorum has been virtually eliminated in the British House of Commons for this reason. In view of the explicit terms of section 22 of the Constitution, however, any restriction on the right of a senator to call attention to the absence of a quorum may be regarded as unconstitutional, as a procedural rule of the Senate cannot be inconsistent with the Constitution.9

It is not the practice for the President to call attention to the absence of a quorum. The President must be satisfied that a quorum is present before taking the chair but, once the chair is taken, the presence of a quorum is the responsibility of the Senate.

The oftmade assertion that it is the responsibility of the government to maintain a quorum is not supported by the rules. The responsibility rests with all senators. This principle was affirmed by a resolution agreed to by the Senate on 4 October 1989.10

[update: Remote participation in Senate proceedings

From August 2020, on the recommendation of the Procedure Committee in its first report of 2020, the Senate adopted from time to time a set of rules to enable senators to participate in Senate proceedings by video link while they were prevented from attending the Senate because of travel restrictions, quarantine requirements or personal health advice during the COVID-19 pandemic The possibility of remote participation had been raised early in the pandemic (see Chapter 7—Meetings of the Senate, under Arrangements for extraordinary meetings), but only came into focus after the sittings scheduled for early August that year were set aside (see Chapter 7, under Sittings and adjournment of the Senate).

The committee agreed that the circumstances of the pandemic warranted an evolution in existing rules to allow senators to address the Senate remotely, but determined that the Senate’s proceedings should be managed in the Senate itself. This reflected a view about “the primacy of attendance in the Parliament as the key means for senators to engage in and determine its work.” It was on this basis that the rules provided that remote participants ought not count toward the Senate quorum, nor participate in formal votes, although the committee did not discount the possibility that different arrangements might be warranted in other circumstances. The other practical outcome of the committee’s approach was that senators participating remotely could not move motions and amendments, although colleagues in the Senate could move them on their behalf. However, the committee recommended a significant exception, enabling remote senators to move amendments and requests to legislation in committee of the whole, so that all parties could have their legislative proposals considered and determined. See also, Chapter 11—voting and divisions, under Pairs.

Early on, the rules for remote participation were adopted as required on a motion moved by leave. In its first report of 2021, the Procedure Committee recommended refining the rules so that they would apply by joint determination of the President and Deputy President. This was adopted as a temporary order until 2 September 2021: 13/5/2021, J.3502-3.][update:The rules were also adopted, by leave, until the end of the first sitting period in 2022. The committee emphasised that ‘remote participation should be strictly limited to enabling senators to participate in Senate proceedings while they are prevented from physically attending the Senate because of COVID-19 related travel restrictions, quarantine requirements or personal health advice. It has been ruled that, by seeking to use the system, senators were representing to the Senate that they met the criteria for doing so, and it was a matter for individual senators to account for their circumstances: 10/2/2022, J.4357.]

Notice Paper

On each sitting day a Notice Paper is issued showing all outstanding business on the Senate's agenda for that day. There is no Notice Paper for the first sitting day of a new session after a general election, as the business before the Senate lapses on the previous day.11

In principle the business set out on the Notice Paper may be transacted on the day for which it is listed, which is usually the sitting day for which the Notice Paper is issued, and in the order indicated on the Notice Paper. Usually, however, the Senate has before it more business, particularly business initiated by senators who are not ministers, than can possibly be transacted over a session, and only a fraction of the business on the Notice Paper is reached on any sitting day. Business not reached remains on the Notice Paper for the next day of sitting and for each successive day until it is disposed of.12

The Notice Paper shows the order in which the listed business should be transacted, in accordance with the rules relating to the order of business set out in standing orders.

Ministers, however, may arrange the order of items of government business on the Notice Paper, which usually consist of government bills, in the order they choose.13 This provision is used by the government to rearrange the order of government business from day to day, reflecting changing priorities.

It is also open to the Senate to rearrange the order of business,14 and therefore the Notice Paper does not necessarily indicate the order in which business will be transacted.

Because of this, another, briefer document, the Order of Business, or Senate “Red”, is issued on each sitting day, showing the business which it is intended to deal with on that day and the order in which it is expected that business will be transacted. Even this document, however, is not an infallible guide, because some business may not be reached and the order of business may be rearranged during the day.15

Although the Senate begins a new session after a prorogation with an empty Notice Paper, business which has lapsed because of a prorogation may be restored to the Notice Paper by motion on notice, and consideration of that business resumed where it was left off. It is the practice to restore such items of business to the Notice Paper at the beginning of each session.16

[update: Changes to the routine of business

The routine of business for the Senate is set out in documents available on its website, which incorporate the changes adopted from time to time. Recent changes include several recommended by the Procedure Committee in its First report of 2017 (adopted with effect from the 2018 sittings) and its Third report of 2019 (adopted as a trial for the 2020 sittings and made permanent in August 2020: 25/8/2020, J.2112). Key changes include:

  • moving consideration of private senators’ bills from Thursday to Monday morning
  • new time limits for the adjournment debate (see Chapter 7—Meetings of the Senate, under Sittings and adjournment of the Senate)
  • the “dinner suspension” on Monday becoming an extra hour of debating time, undertaken on a “no divisions” basis, an earlier start to sittings on Tuesday and a 6pm adjournment on Thursdays
  • different arrangements for debating reports, documents and general business on Thursdays.

A key part of the changes adopted from 2020 was the reduction of speaking times, so that more senators may participate in the time available. General debate (for instance, on second reading motions) was reduced from 20 to 15 minutes, and contributions in committee of the whole were reduced from 15 to 10 minutes (noting that senators may make multiple contributions in committee): see Chapter 10—Debate, under Time limits on debate and speeches.

A major change to the routine adopted as a temporary order on 24 June 2021 sees 30 minutes set aside in the lead up to question time each day for 2-minute statements: 24/6/2021, J.3785-7; see Chapter 9—Motions and amendments, under Formal motions. As the order is temporary, the consequential changes to the routine of business are not reflected in the following text.]

Routine of business

The routine in which the Senate deals with its business is set out in standing order 57. On each day, question time commences at 2 pm, and other items which are taken after question time then follow, such as debates on urgency motions and matters of public importance. The routine of business is as follows:

Monday

  1. Government business only [update: General business orders of the day for the consideration of bills only
    1. at 12.20pm, government business only]
  2. At 2 pm, questions
  3. Motions to take note of answers
  4. Petitions
  5. Notices of motion
  6. Postponement and rearrangement of business
  7. Formal motions – discovery of formal business
  8. Any proposal to debate a matter of public importance or urgency
  9. Consideration of documents under standing order 61 for up to 30 minutes
  10. Government business
  11. At 9.50 pm, adjournment proposed
  12. At 10.30 pm, adjournment.

Tuesday

  1. Government business only
  2. At 2 pm, questions
  3. Motions to take note of answers
  4. Petitions
  5. Notices of motion
  6. Postponement and rearrangement of business
  7. Formal motions – discovery of formal business
  8. Any proposal to debate a matter of public importance or urgency
  9. Consideration of documents under standing order 61 for up to 30 minutes
  10. Consideration of committee reports under standing order 62(4) for up to 60 minutes
  11. Government business
  12. At 7.20 pm, adjournment proposed
  13. Adjournment.

Wednesday

  1. Government business only
  2. At 12.45 pm, senators' statements
  3. At 2 pm, questions
  4. Motions to take note of answers
  5. Petitions
  6. Notices of motion
  7. Postponement and rearrangement of business
  8. Formal motions – discovery of formal business
  9. Any proposal to debate a matter of public importance or urgency
  10. Consideration of documents under standing order 61 for up to 30 minutes
  11. Consideration of committee reports under standing order 62(4) for up to 60 minutes
  12. Government business
  13. At 7.20 pm, adjournment proposed
  14. At 8 pm, adjournment.

Thursday

  1. General business orders of the day for consideration of bills only for up to 2 hours 20 minutes [update: Government business only]
  2. Petitions [update: At 11.45am, petitions]
  3. Notices of motion
  4. Postponement and rearrangement of business
  5. Formal motions – discovery of formal business
  6. Government business
  7. At 12.45 pm, non-controversial government business only
  8. At 2 pm, questions
  9. Motions to take note of answers
  10. Consideration of committee reports under standing order 62(4) for up to 60 minutes
  11. Not later than 4.30 pm, general business
  12. Not later than 6 pm, consideration of documents under general business
  13. Not later than 7 pm, consideration of committee reports and government responses under standing order 62(1)
  14. At 8 pm, adjournment proposed
  15. At 8.40 pm, adjournment.
  16. [update: Consideration of reports and documents for up to 60 minutes, in the following order:
    • tabling and consideration of committee reports and government responses [standing order 62(4)]
    • consideration of documents listed on the Notice Paper [orders of the day under standing order 61]
    • consideration of committee reports, government responses and Auditor-General’s reports listed on the Notice Paper [orders of the day under standing order 62]
  17. Consideration of general business only
  18. At 5.30pm, adjournment proposed
  19. At 6pm, adjournment]

Notices of motion, formal motions and postponement and rearrangement of business occur before the Senate embarks on any business for the day except for the “quarantined” government business on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday; these matters are explained below. [update: One matter that is slightly obscure in the standard routine of business, set out above, is the interplay between the routine set out in standing order 57 and the rules giving special precedence to matters of privilege (SO 81) and business of the Senate (SO 58). Items in these two categories are called on before government business items where the routine indicates “government business”. However, they are not given precedence where the routine indicates “government business only” (or general business only). These terms helpfully signify that only government business (or general business) will be called on. This hierarchy was perhaps more compelling – and certainly more useful – when the Senate’s routine of business was less prescriptive.]

Special precedence for certain business

Certain business is given special precedence over all other business.

A notice of motion for the reference of a matter of privilege to the Privileges Committee is listed on the Notice Paper as a matter of privilege and takes precedence over all other business on the day for which the notice is given, provided that the matter has been raised in writing with the President and the President has given it precedence in accordance with standing order 81.17

Certain business is categorised as business of the Senate, a category separate from government business, that is, business introduced by ministers, and general business, that is, business which is introduced by senators who are not ministers. Business of the Senate takes precedence over government and general business on the day for which it is listed [update: , except during times quarantined for government or general business “only”].18 The following matters are classified as business of the Senate:

  1. a motion for leave of absence for a senator;
  2. a motion concerning the qualification of a senator;
  3. a motion to disallow, disapprove, or declare void and of no effect any instrument made under the authority of any Act of Parliament which provides for the instrument to be subject to disallowance or disapproval by either House of the Parliament, or subject to a resolution of either House of the Parliament declaring the instrument to be void and of no effect;19
  4. an order of the day for the presentation of a report from a committee;
  5. a motion to refer a matter to a standing committee.

By special order of the Senate, other items of business may be classified as business of the Senate, and placed on the Notice Paper and given precedence accordingly. In recent years it has been the practice to make the consideration of reports from the Procedure Committee business of the Senate orders of the day. When there are multiple items for consideration, it has been common for reports to be considered in committee of the whole.

A business of the Senate item which is adjourned continues to take precedence over government and general business on the day to which it is adjourned.

Government and general business

Government business (business initiated by ministers) takes precedence over general business (business initiated by other senators at all times), except for periods on Thursday at the stage indicated in the routine of business.20 The first period of two hours and 20 minutes is reserved for general business orders of the day for the consideration of bills. This arrangement had its origin in agreements reached after the 2010 election between the minority government and independent and minor party members for greater opportunities for the consideration of private members' and senators' bills. It was re-adopted after the 2013 election notwithstanding a change of government and has continued.21 [update: Government business (business initiated by ministers) takes precedence over general business (business initiated by other senators) at all times except for periods on Monday and Thursday indicated in the routine of business: SO59.

The period after prayers until 12.20pm on Mondays is reserved for private senators’ bills (“general business orders of the day for the consideration of bills”). An equivalent period was originally set aside for such bills on Thursday mornings, in accordance with an agreement between the minority government and minor party members in 2010. This was transferred to Monday from the beginning of 2018, following a recommendation of the Procedure Committee: First report of 2017.]

[update: In its Second report of 2011 the Procedure Committee recommended that bills should not be listed at this time unless they were “debate ready”. This was regarded as including a requirement that a bill had been through internal party processes enabling a vote to be taken if required. Senators are occasionally reminded of this requirement (for example, 24/2/2020, J,1396), but the Senate may order the consideration of a bill even if it is not met.]

During the “quarantined” periods for government business, only government business may be transacted, and everything else requires leave or a suspension of standing orders.22 On Thursdays at 12.45 pm the government business that may be transacted is specified as non-controversial government business only. This, according to the Procedure Committee, “is business that senators agree may be dealt with without divisions. It does not preclude debate and amendment of bills but it involves an understanding that divisions will not be called during the period 12.45 to 2 pm.” The committee also indicated that the requirement to proceed to non-controversial business at 12.45 pm did not preclude other business being conducted after such bills have been dealt with, subject to the usual consultations amongst senators and necessary motions to rearrange business.23

Ministers occasionally initiate business with an indication that they do so in a private and not a ministerial capacity. Such business is entered on the Notice Paper as general business. This includes multipartisan motions expressing views on policies or causes.

A motion for the consideration or adoption of the report of a committee of the Senate and any government statement on such a report takes precedence over other general business on the day on which it is set down for consideration.24

In practice, the order of business is usually rearranged to determine the items of general business which will be considered each Thursday. This is often done by a motion moved by a minister under standing order 56; the items of business specified in such a motion are the only items to be considered during the available time. The items to be considered are usually determined by agreement between the non-government parties in the Senate. Committee reports are usually not considered at the time for general business, but in accordance with the special provisions for their consideration under standing order 62 (see below).

If a business of the Senate item is under consideration or not reached at the time for the commencement of general business, it takes precedence in accordance with standing order 58, except for the period on Thursday mornings when only general business orders of the day for the consideration of bills may be dealt with. Otherwise, business of the Senate takes precedence until determined or until the time during which general business would otherwise take precedence over government business has expired.

[update: Rules that gave business of the Senate items precedence over general business on Thursday afternoons were superseded from the first sitting day in 2020: Procedure Committee, Third report of 2019; adopted 3/12/2019, J.1053-5; made permanent 25/8/2020, J.2112.]

The Senate may extend the time for consideration of general business.25

Treatment of routine committee business

The expansion of committee workloads led the Procedure Committee, in 2014, to propose a trial of a different method to authorise committees to meet while the Senate is sitting and to encourage committees to use the existing mechanism under standing order 67 to seek extensions of time by postponing orders of the day for the presentation of committee reports.26 In relation to committees seeking to meet contrary to standing order 33, the chair provides notification of the committee's decision to the Clerk who reads a list of all such proposals immediately after prayers on any day. The proposals are taken to be approved unless any senator requires the question to be put to the Senate for determination, which is done without amendment or debate.27 Having demonstrated that they provided advantages in streamlining routine business without diminishing the rights of senators, the new procedures were adopted as permanent measures on 24 June 2015, with effect from the first sitting day in August 2015.28

Consideration of committee reports and Auditor-General's reports

Under standing order 62(4), there is a period of one hour on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday for debate on committee reports and government responses then presented, with a speaking time limit of 10 minutes for each senator speaking to a report.29 This procedure applies to any document presented by a committee at that time but is not used for reports presented pursuant to Selection of Bills Committee recommendations.30

Another period of one hour on Thursday is provided for consideration of committee reports and government responses, and each senator may speak to any adjourned debates on motions for the consideration or adoption of committee reports and government responses for not more than 10 minutes. [update: From 2020 the hour available on Thursdays has encompassed tabling and consideration of new reports and responses, as well as consideration of documents, reports and responses listed on the Notice Paper: SO 57(1)(d)(x). After the consideration of documents, senators may speak to adjourned debates on motions for the consideration or adoption of committee reports and government responses for not more than 5 minutes.]31 A senator who has already spoken in a debate may speak again under the standing order, and the exercise of the right to speak under the standing order does not prevent a senator speaking for a third time if a motion for the consideration or adoption of a committee report or a government response is called on during the consideration of general business. Because this third opportunity, “in the normal course of business”, does not in practice arise, senators are allowed to speak for a third time if an adjourned debate is called on again on Thursday.

Auditor-General's reports are also considered at this time, after committee reports.

Any outstanding notices of motion for the consideration or adoption of committee reports, which are relatively rare, are first considered at that time on Thursday because of the special precedence they are given.32

Consideration of documents

A special time is provided on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday for the consideration of any documents presented by the President of the Senate, the Auditor-General or ministers. Under standing order 61, 30 minutes are set aside for senators to move motions to take note of one or more of such documents, and each senator may speak for not more than five minutes to such a motion.

Although it is now rare for documents to be presented at other times, any that are so presented are automatically placed on the Notice Paper for future consideration.33

An hour of the time provided for general business on Thursdays is allocated for consideration of [update: During the hour available for consideration of reports, responses and other documents on Thursdays (SO 57(1)(d)(x), as amended from 2020) senators may consider] adjourned motions to take note of documents not considered in the 30 minute period. A senator who has already spoken in a debate during the 30 minute period may then speak again, and may speak for a third time if an adjourned debate is again called on. Because this third opportunity, “in the normal course of business”, does not in practice arise, senators are allowed to speak for a third time if an adjourned debate is called on again on Thursday.

Documents tabled on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday and not reached on those days are carried over for consideration each day until they appear on the list for consideration under general business on Thursday.

A relevant amendment may be moved to a motion to take note of a document, but an amendment to take note of a different document is not a relevant amendment.34

Curtailment of non-government business

The Senate sometimes dispenses with some or all of the elements of general business on Thursdays, usually to devote more time to government business.

If general business on Thursday afternoons is dispensed with in advance by special order, government business automatically occurs at that time. This is because standing order 59 provides that general business takes precedence over government business at the time provided on Thursdays, but does not require that only general business be considered at that time. If, however, general business is not dispensed with by special order but is called on and concludes early, the consideration of committee reports then occurs and the question for the adjournment is then proposed in accordance with standing order 54(4). Dispensing with any element of business on Thursday afternoons after the commencement of general business has the same effect of the adjournment being proposed early. The basis of this distinction is that, once general business has commenced, there is no provision in the routine of business for government business to be resumed, and there is therefore an expectation that there will be no further government business considered that day. In contrast, if consideration of orders of the day for private senators' bills on Thursday mornings is dispensed with, the “normal” routine for Thursday mornings (which provides for government business after formal motions) is restored.

For government business called on by leave after the conclusion of general business, see proceedings on 24 June 2010. The unsatisfactory nature of these proceedings was the subject of criticism in debate.35

On the same basis, if general business and consideration of committee reports on Thursdays are both dispensed with by special order together and in advance of their commencement, government business runs to 8 pm.36

If there are no orders of the day relating to committee reports or government documents but consideration of them is not dispensed with by order, this is regarded as the equivalent of the item being called on and concluding early.

[update: The Senate sometimes dispenses with some or all of the elements of the routine of business for Thursdays to devote additional time to government business. Until the routine for Thursdays was streamlined, there were several complexities that could arise. In practice, motions proposing to alter the routine have generally specified the business to be considered from a particular time sufficiently to avoid these issues. Sometimes such orders provide that, once the additional business has concluded, the Senate will return to its usual routine of business.

From 2020, the consideration of general business and of documents, reports and responses has been reversed. If the consideration of documents etc. concludes early, the Senate proceeds to debate nominated general business items, and if general business concludes early the chair proposes that the Senate adjourn.]

Presentation of other documents

Documents required by statute to be tabled may be presented when there is no other business before the chair.37 In practice, such documents are presented before business is commenced on any day. If reports from committees and other documents ordered by the Senate to be produced are tabled in accordance with standing order 63, they may be debated only on motions moved by leave. Such motions are subject to special time limits.38

Senators' statements

Between 12.45 pm and 2 pm on Wednesdays senators may make statements without any question before the chair, and with a time limit of 10 minutes for each speaker. Divisions are not permitted at this time.39

Notices of motion and orders of the day

Within each category of business listed on the Notice Paper, there are two types of business: notices of motion and orders of the day.

A notice of motion is a statement of intention by a senator that the senator intends to move a motion in the terms of the notice on the day for which the notice is given. Notices of motion are given at the time indicated in the routine of business, and may not be given at other times except by leave.40

There is an opportunity, at the time indicated in the routine of business, for motions of which senators have given notice to be put and determined without debate or amendment, if no senator objects to that course.41 At that time the President asks whether there are any formal motions, and a senator may ask that a motion of which the senator has given notice be taken as formal. If no senator present objects to that course, the motion is then put and determined without amendment or debate. Motions which are not determined in this way are dealt with in accordance with the rules relating to the routine and order of business.

Further information on notices of motion and formal motions is contained in Chapter 9, Motions and Amendments.

Orders of the day are items of business which the Senate has ordered to be taken into consideration on a particular day. Most orders of the day consist of adjourned debates on matters which have been considered earlier, and most are listed for the next day of sitting.

Notices of motion and orders of the day listed for a sitting day which are not reached on that day are automatically deferred till the next day of sitting and are listed on the Notice Paper accordingly.42

A notice of motion may be withdrawn by a senator who has given the notice. As a notice of motion is simply a statement of intention by a senator to move a motion, it is entirely under the control of the senator who has given the notice, and who may choose not to carry out the stated intention.43 A senator may also alter the terms of, or the day for moving, a motion of which notice has been given, provided that this is done at least a day before the motion is due for consideration.44

An order of the day, being a matter which the Senate has ordered for consideration on a particular day, can be removed from the Notice Paper only by a motion duly moved to discharge the order of the day.45

New business

New business may not be commenced after the question for the adjournment of the Senate has been first put on any sitting day.46 The purpose of this rule is to promote certainty in the conduct of business; senators should be able to assume that business in which they have an interest will not be commenced after the prescribed adjournment time. New business means any business on which the Senate is not engaged at the time when the adjournment is put. This means that, if the adjournment of the Senate is deferred and the Senate continues to transact business after that time, the only business dealt with is the business on which the Senate was engaged at that time.

This prohibition may, however, be suspended by motion on notice or by an absolute majority of senators (see under Suspension of standing orders, below), and this may occur at the end of a period of sittings due to the pressure of business.47 Such a motion must be moved before the question for the adjournment is put, but there are precedents for the motion being moved by leave after the adjournment is put.48 In practice, this rule has had little application since changes to the hours of meeting and routine of business in 1994 provided for fixed adjournment times on most days.

Postponement and rearrangement of business

As has been indicated, it is common for the Senate to rearrange the order of its business, so that business is dealt with in an order different from that specified by the standing orders.

There are two ways in which this can be done under the standing orders.

A minister may at any time without notice move a motion connected with the conduct of the business of the Senate. Standing order 56 empowers ministers to move motions at any time when there is no other business before the chair to rearrange any of the business before the Senate. The standing order thus confers upon ministers a special right which is not possessed by other senators.

The standing order is now regarded as permitting any motion to specify the order in which the Senate will deal with business which is before it, to postpone any business at any time, to adjourn debate on any business before the Senate, or to have the question before the Senate put.49

The standing order does not allow a motion to bring on for consideration some matter of business not in some sense before the Senate. Nor does it allow a motion to dispense entirely with a category of business which the Senate has ordered (including by standing order) to be dealt with at a particular time. For example, it does not allow a motion to dispense with questions, with the reporting of a proposal for an urgency motion or a matter of public importance or with general business, but it would allow a motion to postpone any of those matters to a particular time later in a day. Once a category of business has been commenced, a minister may, under standing order 56, move a motion (but not so as to interrupt the consideration of a particular item of business without first adjourning the debate) that that business not be further proceeded with; for example, when general business is under consideration a minister may move that general business not be further proceeded with. The rationale of this is that it is analogous to adjourning a debate, and those senators who have an interest in general business would then be in attendance.

In earlier times the provision in the standing order was regarded as allowing a minister to move virtually any motion to have the Senate consider any business and in any order regardless of the standing orders. In more recent times questions of interpretation have arisen because of the provisions now in the standing orders which fix the order of business in much greater detail than formerly, in particular, provisions which require that particular business be taken at particular times or stages in the routine of business. Because the power conferred by standing order 56 is not a power to suspend standing orders without notice and without an absolute majority, and because the rights of senators could be severely infringed by, for example, a motion to dispense with the consideration of government documents, some refinement of the interpretation of the standing order has occurred.

The other method by which business may be rearranged under the standing orders is by the postponement of business by a senator who has charge of it. Before the time provided in the routine of business a senator may lodge with the Clerk a notice that any notice of motion standing in the senator's name, or order of the day of which the Senator is in charge on the Notice Paper for that day, be a notice of motion or order of the day for a subsequent day. Under this procedure, the chair of a committee may, on behalf of that committee, postpone an order of the day for the presentation of a report. At the time provided the Clerk reads a list of the postponement notices, and the items of business are postponed accordingly, but at the request of any senator the question is put on any item, and such a question is determined without amendment or debate.50 Before an amendment of the standing order in 1999, the senator in charge of any particular item of business had to move a motion for a postponement. In the absence of the senator in charge of any business, a postponement may, at the request of such senator, be made by any other senator. Normally the Senate accepts a postponement by a senator under this standing order.51

If a senator moves a motion by leave to postpone business at other times, it is regarded as a motion to rearrange business (see below) and therefore subject to debate.

In addition to exercising these rights under the standing orders, senators may seek to rearrange business by leave of the Senate or by the suspension of standing orders.52

Interruption of business

Business the consideration of which is interrupted, for example, by the calling on of other business at a prescribed time or the putting of the question for the adjournment of the Senate at the time specified in the standing orders, is deemed to have been adjourned. If the interruption occurs in the course of the day the adjournment is till a later time of the day. If interrupted business is not reached later in the day, or the adjournment of the Senate intervenes, the business is listed on the Notice Paper as business for the next day of sitting.53

In practice, where debate is on a non-substantive question which does not require a definite decision of the Senate, and it would not be rational to retain the item on the Notice Paper, the Chair puts the question when the time for debate has expired. An example is a motion to take note of a question after question time.

Standing order 68(2)(c) provides that if a vote is being taken the vote shall be completed. This is taken to refer to the whole process of determining a question, so that if the process of determining the question has commenced it is concluded when the time has expired. Thus, on 28 August 1997 in debate on an opposition general business motion concerning tariffs, the motion to close debate was put just before the time for the debate expired. The division on the closure was then concluded. That motion having been carried, this started the process of determining the question. The process was then completed by putting the amendment on the question and then putting the main question.

Urgency motions under standing order 75 are subject to the special provision in paragraph (7) whereby the question on an urgency motion is put when the time expires.

Resumption of postponed and adjourned business

Normally business is postponed or adjourned till the next day of sitting, and therefore remains on the Notice Paper to be called on in its due order. Sometimes, however, business is postponed till a later hour, that is, later on the same day. This includes business interrupted in the course of a day, which is deemed to be adjourned till a later hour. There is then a question of when it is to be called on.

Where a government business notice of motion or order of the day is postponed or adjourned till a later hour, it is called on during a time when government business may be considered, when a minister indicates that it is to be called on.

Where an item of general business is postponed or adjourned till a later hour, it is not called on unless and until it is reached in the normal course of consideration of general business (which in practice does not happen), or unless the order of business is rearranged to have it called on.

A business of the Senate item which is postponed or adjourned till a later hour is called on when the senator in charge of the item indicates that it is to be called on, provided only that it does not interrupt the consideration of business which, under a standing or other order, is considered at a fixed time or place in the routine of business, such as questions, a matter of public importance or urgency, consideration of government documents under standing order 61 and consideration of committee reports under standing order 62. Such a business of the Senate item is called on at the direction of the senator in charge of it notwithstanding that it intrudes upon the time available for government business or general business; the rationale of this is that business of the Senate takes precedence over government and general business under standing order 58. A business of the Senate item which is interrupted is called on again when business other than fixed-time business is resumed, regardless of whether government or general business would otherwise be considered at that time.

Leave of the Senate

A motion otherwise requiring notice may be moved without notice by leave of the Senate.54 Senators may also seek leave to take other courses of action which would not otherwise be in accordance with standing orders, for example, to make a statement or to present a document.

Leave of the Senate means unanimous consent of senators present, and is granted when no senator present objects to the course of action for which leave is sought.

A senator seeking leave must make clear to the Senate the course of action for which leave is sought. The President then asks: “Is leave granted?”. A senator may object simply by saying “no”. If there is no objection, the President states: “There being no objection, leave is granted”, and the senator granted leave then proceeds on the course of action for which leave has been granted.

Leave is restricted to the particular purpose for which it has been sought, and is subject to any limitations contained in the application for leave. Thus a senator granted leave to make a statement cannot then move a motion, and a senator granted leave to move a motion relating to one subject cannot then move a motion relating to another subject; similarly, a senator who has successfully sought leave to speak for two minutes cannot speak for longer than that time.

The granting of leave does not suspend the other requirements of the standing orders. For example, a senator who has successfully sought leave to make a statement cannot in the course of the statement make any remarks which would be out of order under the rules of debate in standing order 193.

In practice, a great deal of the Senate's business is transacted by leave, and during any typical sitting senators frequently seek leave to move motions, make statements and take other actions which would not be permissible under the standing orders. A senator normally cannot move a motion without giving notice, and a motion of which notice has been given by a senator who is not a minister would normally not be reached in the course of a session because of the large number of notices of motion and other business on the Notice Paper. The granting of leave therefore provides an expeditious and convenient way of transacting business by unanimous consent.

Suspension of standing orders

Another method of transacting business which would not otherwise be in accordance with standing orders is for the Senate to suspend its standing orders to allow a particular course of action to be undertaken.

In cases of urgent necessity standing orders may be suspended on motion without notice if the motion is carried by an absolute majority of the whole number of senators.55 The proviso relating to urgent necessity is a matter for the Senate to judge. If a senator moves the suspension of standing orders, the Senate determines whether the matter for which the suspension is sought is a matter of urgent necessity by its determination of the motion.56

If notice of a motion to suspend standing orders is given, however, the motion may be carried by a simple majority, that is, a majority of the senators present and voting. Such a notice of motion has no special precedence over other business, so that if a senator who is not a minister gives such a notice it is placed on the Notice Paper as general business and in all likelihood will not be reached in the normal course of business.

In order to move for the suspension of standing orders and to avoid the requirement for an absolute majority, which is difficult to achieve, senators have devised a number of contingent notices of motion. These notices indicate that, contingent on a particular stage being reached in the Senate's business or the occurrence of a particular event, the senators will move the suspension of standing orders in order to allow a particular course of action.

This device of moving for the suspension of standing orders under a contingent notice is particularly used for the rearrangement of business. As has been explained above, a minister may move a motion relating to the rearrangement of business before the Senate at any time without notice under standing order 56, but a senator who is not a minister may move only to postpone items of business of which the senator has charge. There is no right of a senator who is not a minister to move for the rearrangement of business. Thus party leaders and independent senators usually place on the Notice Paper contingent notices that they will move to suspend standing orders to allow them to move a subsequent motion to rearrange business before the Senate. A notice of motion which allows this to be done at the time for the postponement for business is in the following terms:

To move (contingent on the President proceeding to the placing of business on any day)—That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate moving a motion relating to the order of business on the Notice Paper.

For use at any other time, the contingency is expressed in terms of the Senate completing one item of business before moving on to consider the next item. Pursuant to this notice, at the occurance of either contingency, a senator may move that so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the senator moving a motion relating to the order of business on the Notice Paper. This motion requires only a simple majority to be carried, and if it is agreed to the senator may then move a motion to rearrange the business of the Senate, for example, to give precedence over all other business to some item of business standing on the Notice Paper in the senator's name.

Senators have also devised contingent notices to allow them to bring on for consideration some completely new item of business which is not on the Senate Notice Paper, for example, some completely new motion. This contingent notice is in the following terms:

To move (contingent on the Senate on any day concluding its consideration of any item of business and prior to the Senate proceeding to the consideration of another item of business)—That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate moving a motion relating to the conduct of the business of the Senate or to provide for the consideration of any matter.

It will be seen that the suspension of standing orders sought by a motion moved pursuant to this notice would allow a senator to move any motion which a minister may move under standing order 56 or a motion to give precedence to some completely new item of business. Because standing order 56 is not interpreted as allowing a minister to move for the consideration of a completely new item of business, a contingent notice in the following terms is employed by ministers:

To move (contingent on the Senate on any day concluding its consideration of any items of business and prior to the Senate proceeding to the consideration of another item of business)—That so much of the standing orders be suspended as would prevent a Minister moving a motion to provide for the consideration of any matter.

These contingent notices have virtually overcome the safeguard contained in standing order 209, that a motion for the suspension of standing orders moved without notice requires an absolute majority. It may seem at first sight, therefore, that that safeguard could be removed. If the safeguard were removed, it might also appear that, to avoid complexity in the proceedings, senators should be allowed to rearrange the business without a suspension of standing orders. The requirements to give a contingent notice and to suspend the standing orders before a motion to rearrange the business can be moved, however, still provide some safeguard. The Senate must make a deliberate decision to depart from the standing orders in order to allow some course of action to be undertaken, and the Senate has an opportunity to determine whether standing orders should be suspended, that is, whether the matter proposed to be raised is of urgent necessity, before making a decision on the merits of that matter. It is therefore considered that the limitations contained in standing order 209 should be maintained.57

It has been ruled that a contingent notice of motion of this type may be used only once by any senator at each occurrence of the contingency to which it refers. The rationale of this ruling is that once the Senate has been asked to suspend the standing orders to depart from the order of business on one such occasion and has declined to do so, the request should not be capable of being repeatedly made, because this would provide a means of permanently obstructing the business of the Senate.58

[update: The rule against repeated requests to suspend standing orders was also applied in respect of a “time management” motion in 2018. The motion was put in place on a government suspension motion on 20 June and the Senate rejected an opposition suspension motion the following day intended to remove it: 20/6/2018, J.3200-4; 21/6/2018, J.3235. Neither the President nor the Chair could subsequently entertain further proposals to divert from that agreed procedure. A similar ruling was made in respect of proceedings under a limitation debate on the last day of sitting in 2018: 6/12/2018, J.4498.]

These general purpose contingent notices for suspension of standing orders are designed to allow the rearrangement of business to bring on any item of business, which of course is not specified in the contingent notices. The use of such notices therefore involves suspending standing orders first, then moving to rearrange the business, then moving the motion concerned. Contingent notices designed to deal with particular circumstances often have suspension of standing orders built into their terms, so that the intermediate step is not necessary.59 An example is given above, for the rearrangement of business already on the Notice Paper.

A motion for suspension of standing orders moved during consideration of a matter must be relevant to that matter.60 This means that contingent notices of motion to suspend standing orders to rearrange the business can be employed only when there is no other business before the chair.

Suspension of standing orders is limited to the particular purpose for which the suspension has been sought.61 Thus, if a senator is successful in moving a motion to suspend standing orders to allow the moving of a substantive motion, the only standing orders which are suspended are those which would prevent the moving of the motion, and the motion and any debate on it are still subject to all other provisions of the standing orders, such as standing order 193 relating to rules of debate.

Debate on a motion to suspend standing orders is limited to five minutes for each senator speaking and 30 minutes in total.62 This limitation does not suspend the requirement for relevance to the question of whether standing orders should be suspended.63 A compound motion incorporating a suspension of standing orders is subject to these time limits only if the suspension is its primary purpose and not merely incidental to the motion. [update: A motion to suspend standing orders may be amended, provided the amendment is relevant to the motion as moved. This follows from the exposition of rulings against repeated suspensions in the Procedure Committee’s First report of 1993 and Second report of 2005. For an example, see: 6/12/2018, J.4544-6.]

A motion for suspension of standing orders may be moved in committee of the whole, provided that it is relevant to the matter under consideration in the committee.64 It may be regarded as anomalous that a committee of the whole can suspend the standing orders, but standing order 144(7) provides that in committee of the whole the same rules of procedure apply as in the Senate, except where the standing orders explicitly otherwise provide. Moreover, in dealing with a motion to adopt a report of a committee of the whole the Senate has the opportunity to approve of anything the committee has done in considering the matters referred to it.65

A question arises as to the effect of the procedural motion to allow a substantive motion to be moved, or some item of business to be called on, after standing orders are suspended. This procedural motion takes the form: “That a motion to ...... may be moved immediately (or, that the order of the day relating to ...... be called on immediately) and have precedence over all other business this day till determined”. The question is whether this motion has the effect of suspending the consideration of all other items in the routine of business, such as question time, or whether it merely gives precedence over other business in the strict sense of the word, that is, government and general business. The interpretation which has been followed is that if such a motion is passed before any business is embarked upon, the subsequent substantive motion has precedence over all other business including business which has a fixed place or time in the routine of business. This was the case with the motions agreed to on 9 December 1991, 5 November 1992 and 25 November 2010.66 If, however, the procedural motion is passed at discovery of formal business, at the placing of business or during consideration of government business, the subsequent substantive motion has precedence only over business in the narrow sense, and may be interrupted by other items in the routine of business which have a fixed place or time in the routine, such as question time. This was the case with the motion agreed to on 25 June 1992.67

In neither circumstance does continuing debate on the substantive motion interfere with suspensions of the sitting or the putting of the question for the adjournment of the Senate.

On some occasions, the suspension of standing orders has been for expedited consideration of a substantive motion and the procedural motion has therefore provided for consideration of the substantive motion without amendment or debate.68 While there may be circumstances where such a draconian approach is warranted, such as prolonged and determined obstruction by minority of senators, it is generally not in keeping with the character of the Senate as a multiparty chamber representing a variety of interests. However, such circumstances have prompted most restrictions on the procedural rights of senators, including time limits on debate and the procedures for urgent bills (or “guillotine”).

Items of business taken together

By special order of the Senate items of business may be taken together. Usually such an order provides for the items to be considered together but for the questions in relation to them to be put separately.69 This procedure of ordering items to be taken together is to be distinguished from the procedure known as a cognate debate, whereby separate items of business remain as separate items but by leave are debated together when one of them is before the Senate.70

Questions to senators concerning business

Questions to senators and chairs of committees at question time were abolished in 2009.71

Recording of proceedings

The proceedings of the Senate are recorded in the Journals of the Senate, which are kept by the Clerk and published.72 The Journals record the proceedings only, that is, matters considered by the Senate and action taken in relation to them; they do not record debate, which is recorded in the transcript known as Senate Debates or Hansard.

The Journals show all votes taken by division in the Senate and how senators present have voted. The Journals also record the attendance of senators; this is important because, under section 20 of the Constitution, the place of a senator becomes vacant if the senator is absent from the sittings of the Senate for two consecutive months without the Senate's permission.73

Section 15AB of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 provides that the Journals of the Senate may be referred to by courts to assist in interpretation of statutory provisions in accordance with that section.

Further information on publication of proceedings is contained in Chapter 3.

Senate Routine of Business

[update: An updated version of the routine of business for the Senate can be found in documents available on its website, which incorporate the changes adopted from time to time.]

Senate Routine of Business

1 SO 51.

2 SO 52(3), 197(1).

3 SO 52(1).

4 SO 147.

5 SO 52(2).

6 SO 52(4).

7 SO 52(7).

8 SO 52(6). For precedents, see 3/10/1989, J.2080; 18/12/1989, J.2397; 14/3/1991, J.880.

9 For a discussion of this point, see Finance and Public Administration Committee, additional estimates 2007-08 hearing, transcript, pp. 6-7.

10 J.2083-5.

11 See Chapter 7, Meetings of the Senate, under Meetings after prorogation or dissolution of House. A Notice Paper was issued for the first day of the second session of the 44th Parliament on 18/4/2016.

12 SO 80(2), 97(2).

13 SO 65.

14 See under Rearrangement of business, below.

15 For further information on procedural publications, see Chapter 3, Publication of Proceedings.

16 See also Chapter 12, Legislation, under Revival of bills.

17 See Chapter 2, Parliamentary Privilege, under Raising of privilege matters.

18 SO 58.

19 See Chapter 15, Delegated Legislation.

20 SO 59.

21 14/11/2013, J.128; 24/6/2014, J.975.

22 For the presentation of a report, by leave, during time quarantined for government business, see 30/8/2004, J.3947.

23 Procedure Committee, First report of 2012, PP 144/2012, p. 2.

24 SO 60.

25 11/4/1991, J.924-6.

26 Procedure Committee, Second report of 2014, PP 142/2014; Third report of 2014, PP 176/2014.

27 For precedent, see 19/11/2014, J.1796; 24/11/2014, J.1814-5; 26/3/2015, J.2431, 2432; 17/6/2015, J.2678; 15/10/2015, J.3257, 3261. For precedent for a proposed extension of time for a committee to report being put to the Senate for determination, see 12/10/2015, J.3196.

28 J.2811.

29 Adopted initially as a temporary order on 24/9/2014, J.1489-90, and permanently on 24/6/2015, J.2811. Certain reports presented out of sitting may be considered at the first available opportunity under this standing order (SO 38(7)(e)).

30 This is in accordance with guidance provided by the Procedure Committee: Second report of 2014, PP 142/2014, p. 3; if a report is presented on Monday, SO 169(1)(a) provides for a motion to be moved without notice for its consideration at a future time.

31 SO 62.

32 SO 60.

33 Streamlining of these procedures, adopted on a trial basis on 24/9/2014 (J.1488) and permanently on 24/6/2015 (J.2811), consolidated the multiple opportunities for presenting documents and simplified their consideration. See Procedure Committee, Second report of 2014, PP 142/2014, Second report of 2015, PP 188/2015.

34 See ruling of Deputy President West, SD, 24/3/1998, pp. 1152-3.

35 J.3775, 3776; SD, p. 4414.

36 For precedent, see 21/9/2011, J.1528-9.

37 SO 166 refers to documents tabled by ministers and pursuant to statute.

38 SO 169(2).

39 SO 57(2). Under changes agreed to in 2014-15, this has been renamed senators' statements and the individual speaking time reduced to 10 minutes.

40 Except notices for references to legislative and general purpose standing committees: SO 25(11).

41 SO 66. This opportunity is known as Discovery of formal business.

42 SO 80(2), 97(2).

43 Special provisions apply to the withdrawal of notices of motion for the disallowance of delegated legislation: SO 78; see Chapter 9, Motions and Amendments, under Notice of motion.

44 SO 77.

45 SO 97(4).

46 SO 64.

47 A contingent notice has been used for this purpose: 16/6/1992, J.2444.

48 See under Leave of the Senate, below.

49 In relation to the adjournment of debate and the closure, see SO 199(3) and 201(6).

50 SO 67.

51 For a postponement notification required to be put, see 18/8/2003, J.2178; 19/8/2003, J.2213; for the question put on a proposed extension of time for a committee to report, see 12/10/2015, J.3196.

52 See below; for rearrangement of government business by non-government senators, see Chapter 12, Legislation, under Control of bills.

53 SO 68.

54 SO 88.

55 SO 209.

56 Ruling of President Gould, SD, 21/7/1909, p. 1378.

57 For precedents for suspensions of standing orders moved pursuant to standing order 209 in circumstances not covered by any of the available contingent notices see proceedings on 25/11/2010, J.434, 437-9, and 26/11/2010, J.470 [update: ; 7/12/2017, J.2509; 27/6/2018, J.3324; 6/12/2018, J.4536, J.4546].

58 The rulings, and expositions of them, occurred on 3/12/1991, J.1826; 5/12/1991, J.1870-1; 16/11/1992, J.3063-4; 30/11/1992, J.3157; the Procedure Committee recommended that the Senate uphold the rulings: 1st Report of 1993, PP 158/1993,  28/9/1993. See also ruling of President Sibraa, 20/12/1993, J.1106; ruling of President Calvert, 14/9/2005, J.1108-9; 15/9/2005, J.1141-2; ruling of President Hogg, 25/11/2010, J.439 [update: ; rulings of President Ryan, 21/6/2018, J.3237; 6/12/2018, J.4498]; Procedure Committee, 2nd Report of 2005, PP 280/2005, endorsed by the Senate 9/11/2005, J.1380-1 . As a result of the last decision of the Senate, the Chair is able to exercise a discretion in applying the ruling to ensure that adequate opportunity is given to senators to state a case for a suspension of standing orders.) See, for example, ruling of President Parry, 15/3/2016, J. 3931 J.3929; [update:10/8/2021, J.3888; 30/11/2021, SD, p. 6853]. The principle has also been applied to repeated suspensions of standing orders moved other than pursuant to contingent notice, 25/11/2010, J.439. 3/12/2015, J.3606; 3/12/2015, J.3606.

59 18/10/1996, J.756.

60 SO 209(3).

61 SO 210.

62 SO 209(4). [update: A suspension motion moved in connection with the consideration of formal motions is put without amendment or debate: SO 66(4), see Chapter 9—Motions and amendments, under Formal motions.]

63 Ruling of President Sibraa, 20/12/1993, J.1106.

64 SO 209(3). Precedents: 23/10/1956, J.185; 4/6/1969, J.521; 9/11/1977, J.396; 16/5/1980, J.1349; 26/11/2010, J.468-9.

65 See Chapter 14 on Committee of the Whole Proceedings.

66 9/12/1991, J.1885; 5/11/1992, 2965; 25/11/2010, 432-7.

67 J.2610.

68 23/9/2014, J.1474; 19/11/2014, J.1802; 3/12/2015, J.3603.

69 For examples see 14/4/1988, J.628; 19/10/1988, J.1031; 23/11/1988, J.1143, 1144; 13/6/1989, J.1862; 29/8/2000, J.3139-40; 27/11/2000; J.3573.

70 19/5/1988, J.727; 26/5/1988, J.765; 23/11/1988, J.1146. For the procedures for taking bills together, see Chapter 12, Legislation, under Initiation.

71 Adopted 10/3/2009, J.1657-8. For earlier practice, see 12th edition, pp. 136, 171.

72 SO 43.

73 See also Chapter 6, Senators, under Leave of absence.