The 2017–18 Budget provides an estimated $79.6 billion for
school funding over the forward estimates. This represents growth in real terms
of 11.4% over the next four years.
The Government has predicted that under its new school
funding plan federal Government funding for schools will be $30.6 billion by
2027. It has committed to
delivering an additional $18.6 billion in recurrent funding to implement the
new plan. However, this Budget accounts
for only $1.7 billion of this additional funding—most of it (over 90%)
will be provided in the last six years of the implementation period.
The Government has stated that its new plan for school
funding will deliver ‘the real “Gonski” needs-based funding model’ by replacing
the 27 different funding models that currently exist and providing a uniform
funding system. Some of the key features of
this new system as outlined in the Budget are:
- By 2027, the Australian Government will fund government schools
at 20% of their Schooling Resource Standard (SRS) amount (comprising a base per
student amount and loadings for students and schools that need extra support).
Non-government schools will be funded at 80% of their SRS amount. Currently,
government schools are funded on average at 17.0% of their SRS and
non-government schools at 76.8%. These proportions reflect
the Australian Government’s funding role—it is the majority public funder of
non-government schools and, conversely, state and territory governments are the
main providers of public funds for government schools.
- Northern Territory government schools will receive additional
assistance of $35.6 million to improve student outcomes.
- The loading for students with disability (SWD) will be
transitioned to a new model based on a nationally consistent SWD definition and
scaled rates according to the level of classroom adjustment needed. Currently,
a flat rate of 186% of the base per student amount for SWD attending mainstream
schools and 223% for SWD attending special schools applies, and eligibility is
based upon varying state and territory definitions of disability.
- Transition assistance for ‘disadvantaged and vulnerable’ schools
adversely affected by the move to the new system, amounting to $39.8 million
over ten years, will be provided.
- The base per student SRS amount will be indexed by 3.56% annually
from 2018 to 2020. Thereafter it will be indexed by a composite of the Wage
Price Index and the Consumer Price Index.
Notably, the Government has dispensed with the ‘no school
will lose funding' principle that has been a feature of Australian Government
recurrent funding for non-government schools since the introduction of the
Howard Government’s socioeconomic status (SES) system in 2001. 
As a result of the proposed new arrangements, 353
non-government schools which are estimated to be over their entitlement of 80%
of the SRS in 2017, will receive less funding or will have their funding frozen
or grown at a slower rate. Of these schools, the
Government has identified 24 non-government schools as losing funding—the
reduction is estimated at less than 2% a year over the next four years.
And, following from the Government’s release of its Schools Funding Estimator,
the names of the 24 schools have been published in various media reports.
The temporary adjustment assistance, to be provided on a
case-by-case basis, will provide relief for some of these schools.
Reaction to the plan
There has been a positive response to the Government’s
proposed new funding plan from some in the government and independent school
sectors, business, and other school education commentators.
The Independent Schools Council, for example, regards the funding announcement
as a ‘positive step’ and Peter Goss from the Grattan Institute considers the
plan ‘credible’ and one that ‘we have been looking for’.
However, others, such as the Australian Education Union
(AEU), consider the plan ‘a poor substitute’. The AEU cites figures
that claim the new funding plan will deliver $22.0 billion less in funding
over the ten years to 2027 than the previous Labor Government’s arrangements.
State premiers and education ministers have complained about the amount of
funding their school systems will receive under the new school funding plan, and
questioned the accuracy of Schools Funding Estimator calculations.
The Shadow Education Minister, Tanya Plibersek, argues that the
SRS will be lower than under Labor and that while the Government has said that
a condition of funding will be for states to maintain their funding, there is
no requirement for this to happen in real terms.
The Opposition has committed to ‘restore’ the $22.0 billion in school funding
over ten years.
The Greens consider that the current school funding system in
general is ‘broken’. They are also concerned that the new policy represents ‘cuts’
to school funding and have announced that they will refer the Australian Education
Amendment Bill 2017, which, if passed, will implement the Government’s school
funding plan, to a Senate committee inquiry.
Catholic systemic schools
The Australian Government’s current contribution to per
student funding amounts for most non-government schools is adjusted according
to a measure of a school’s ‘capacity to contribute’.
The measure is based on a school’s socioeconomic status (SES) score, which aims to measure the capacity of the school’s parent community to
support the school financially and takes into account parental income. A
non-government school’s SES score determines its capacity to contribute as a
percentage of the per-student funding amount, ranging from 10% for those with
the lowest SES scores to 80% for those with the highest SES scores. Some
non-government schools, such as special schools, are exempt from the ‘capacity
to contribute’ requirement.
Under the Australian Education Act 2013, SES scores
may also be determined by the Minister by legislative instrument. Using this
mechanism, Catholic schools in each state and territory Catholic education
system, except the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), are funded according to
the average of all schools in their system—this arrangement is known as the
‘system weighted average’. The SES score for ACT Catholic systemic schools is
the average SES score for all Catholic systemic schools across Australia.
The Minister’s ability to determine SES scores will be removed under the new
arrangements and all non-government schools will be funded according to their
individual SES score. This will mean that Catholic systemic schools with a
higher SES score than the current student weighted average SES score for their
system will have their capacity to contribute percentage increased and their
Australian Government funding reduced.
According to reports from the Catholic education sector,
Catholic systemic schools in the ACT will be most affected, presumably because
the ACT has a generally high socioeconomic status relative to their current
average SES score. Using the Schools
Funding Estimator, one media report has calculated that all ACT Catholic
systemic schools will have a 7.3% reduction in funding per student by 2027 (not
taking into account any structural adjustment assistance that will be
provided). The Government has countered
by asserting that nationally funding for Catholic schools will increase on
average by 3.7% per student over the next four years.
The Catholic education sector is not only concerned that
lower levels of funding will result in higher school fees, but it has also been
critical of the indexation methodology. It has disputed the
Government’s projections for indexation beyond 2020 (estimated at 3.3%) and produced
its own lower projection of 1.9% for the proposed floating indexation rate.
Although the Government stated that it would not make any
changes to its schools funding plan, it has nevertheless made a concession to
the Catholic sector’s concerns by now including in the amending legislation a
provision guaranteeing that indexation will not fall below 3%.
The Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 has been
introduced into Parliament. The Bill, as has
previous school funding legislation, stipulates conditions of financial
assistance for the states and territories. These conditions include
a national agreement on school education to be developed collaboratively
through the Council of Australian Governments and a bilateral agreement
relating to the implementation of school education reform. Non-government
school education authorities will also have to comply with the reforms.
The national agreement and the school education reforms will
be informed by the Review to Achieve Educational Excellence in
Australian Schools, which has been established to advise the Government about
how the additional funding to be provided by the new school funding plan should
be used to improve school performance and student achievement.
The Review panel is chaired by David Gonski and is required to report by
December 2017. The new school funding agreements with the states and
territories will be negotiated in the first half of 2018.
Australian Government, Budget
strategy and outlook: budget paper no. 1: 2017–18, pp. 6-18–6-19; M
Turnbull (Prime Minister) and S Birmingham (Minister for Education and
needs-based funding for Australia’s schools, media release, 2 May 2017.
The budget information in this brief has been taken from the following
document unless otherwise sourced: Australian Government, Budget
measures: budget paper no. 2: 2017–18, pp.87–8. For further information
about the Government’s school funding plan, see: Department of Education and
Training (DET), ‘Quality
schools’, DET website.
Turnbull and Birmingham, op. cit. For a list of the 27 funding models,
see: Senate Education and Employment Legislation Committee, Answers to
Questions on Notice, Education Portfolio, Supplementary Budget Estimates
2016–17, Question SQ16-000854.
Australian Government, New
fairer school funding from 2018, Quality Schools fact sheet.
Australian Government, Additional
funding for the Northern Territory, Quality Schools fact sheet.
Australian Government, Fairer funding for students
with disability, Quality Schools fact sheet.
Australian Government, A
fairer transition to the new model, Quality Schools fact sheet.
M Harrington, Australian
Government funding for schools explained: 2013 update, Background note,
Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 8 March 2013, pp. 9 and 35.
K Andrews, ‘Second
reading speech: Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017’, House of
Representatives, Debates, 11 May 2017.
Australian Government, ‘School
funding estimator’, DET website; P Karp, ‘Schools
hit list revealed: online tool shows Gonski 2.0 winners and losers’, Guardian
(Australia), online edition, 9 May 2017; Australian Government, A
fairer transition to the new model, op. cit.
For example, P Karp, op. cit.
S Birmingham (Minister for Education and Training), More
support for Turnbull Government’s schools plan, media release,
4 May 2017.
Independent Schools Council of Australia, Funding
announcement for independent schools a positive step, media release, 2
May 2017; P Goss, ‘Gonski 2.0: Is this the school funding plan we have been looking for?
Finally, yes’, The Conversation, 3 May 2017.
Australian Education Union, Turnbull’s
funding con exposed, media release, 4 May 2017.
Ibid.; T Plibersek (Shadow Minister for Education), Liberal
school funding policy falling to pieces, media release, 5 May 2017;
P Singhai, ‘”You
should not rely on these figures”: NSW education boss slams federal funding
model’, The Sydney Morning Herald, 11 May 2017.
T Plibersek (Shadow Minister for Education), Interview
Fran Kelly, ABC RN Breakfast, Liberals’ school funding cuts,
transcript, 3 May 2017.
P Karp, ‘Bill
Shorten’s budget reply commits Labor to restore $22bn in school cuts’, The
Guardian (Australia), online edition, 11 May 2017.
S Hanson-Young (Greens Education Spokesperson), Schools
funding needs to be fixed, not cut, media release, 2 May 2017; Greens
to refer Government education plan to inquiry, media release, 5 May
2017; Parliament of Australia, ‘Australian
Education Amendment Bill 2017 homepage’, Australian Parliament website.
Information in this section is from the following unless otherwise
sourced: Australian Government, Guide
to the Australian Education Act 2013.
Explanatory statement, Australian
Education (SES Scores) Determination 2013.
I Baker, ‘Catholic Education NSW responds: Government
funding announcement “unprecedented and insulting”’, The Catholic Weekly, 7 May 2017.
E Baker, ‘The
Canberra schools losing funds revealed’, The Canberra Times, 9 May
S Birmingham, Doorstop interview, Nazareth Catholic College, Adelaide,
transcript, 5 May 2017.
D Crowe and S Benson, ‘Catholic
schools fear $100m blow’, The Australian, 5 May 2017; Catholic
Education Melbourne, School funding promises washed out as Minister relies on
poor forecast, media release, 8 May 2017.
P Karp, ‘”No
special deals”: Morrison defends Gonski 2.0 despite warnings on Catholic school
fees’, Guardian Australia, online edition, 7 May 2017; T Dodd,
makes funding pledge to assuage Catholic schools’, The Australian
Financial Review, 11 May 2017.
Parliament of Australia, ‘Australian
Education Amendment Bill 2017 homepage’, op. cit.
Information in this paragraph is from: Explanatory
Memorandum, Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017, p. 3.
Information in this paragraph is from: DET, ‘Review
to Achieve Educational Excellence in Australian Schools’, DET website.
Note: This version of the brief includes a minor revision relating to ACT Catholic Schools. The revision made on 23/05/17.
All online articles accessed May 2017.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to email@example.com.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Enquiry Point for referral.