Public sector staffing, organisation and efficiencies

Budget Review 2017–18 Index

Philip Hamilton

Efficiency dividend

Since 1987–88, the efficiency dividend (ED) has been an annual funding reduction for Australian government agencies, in general applied only to ‘departmental’ expenses.[1] The ED has usually been applied at a rate of either 1 or 1.25 per cent; in some years governments have increased the rate, with the highest ED rate being 4 per cent in 2012–13.

The ED is not always explicitly stated in the Budget because, rather than being a budget measure, the ED is a factor determined and applied by government in the course of developing the Budget (along with other factors such as cost indices and policy decisions).[2]

The 2017–18 Budget does not explicitly state the rate at which the ED will be applied. However, the 2016–17 Budget stated that the ED would be maintained at 2.5 per cent through 2016–17 and 2017–18, before being reduced to 2 per cent in 2018–19 and 1.5 per cent in 2019–20.[3]

Affecting universities (and with likely flow-on effects for university students), the 2017–18 Budget introduces an ED of 2.5 per cent in 2018 and 2019 on the Commonwealth Grant Scheme, an ‘administered’ appropriation through which the government subsidises tuition costs for higher education students.[4] In 2010, the Government formalised a policy whereby the ED could be applied to administered appropriations where the appropriations involve ‘payments for outsourced programs that could have been managed within the Australian Government (that is, they are departmental-like in nature)’.[5]

Functional and Efficiency Reviews

Functional and Efficiency Reviews provide the Government with advice on opportunities to remove inefficiency or reduce expenditure in its operations. The Government reports that, since 201415, a total of 21 Functional and Efficiency Reviews have examined ‘most Commonwealth portfolios and departments and several major agencies’.[6] Separately, the Department of Defence has been the subject of a First Principles Review.[7]

The Government attributes Functional and Efficiency Reviews with achieving ‘savings of around $5 billion from 2014–15 to 2020–21’ and ‘around a further $14 billion over the period 2021–22 to 2026–27’. In contrast to 2016–17, the budget papers do not indicate which entities will be subject to review in the next financial year.

Smaller Government and new agencies

After three Budgets, the Government has declared:

The rationalisation phase of the Smaller Government agenda is now largely complete, following delivery of a comprehensive package of Smaller Government reforms. This phase, which has included consolidating, merging and abolishing bodies, is estimated to achieve $1.5 billion in savings.

Coinciding with the conclusion of the Smaller Government agenda, the Budget outlines the creation of at least eight new entities (noted below), some of which are likely to require establishing legislation.

Legislation to establish the Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority received assent in February 2017. It is likely legislation or disallowable regulations will be needed to establish the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) Quality and Safeguards Commission, the Regional Investment Corporation, and possibly the Infrastructure and Project Financing Agency. It is unlikely legislation will be needed for the Cyber Security Advisory Office (a non-corporate Commonwealth entity), and the Western Sydney Airport (WSA) Corporation Ltd.[8]

The design of the National Housing Finance and Investment Corporation (and the affordable housing bond aggregator it will operate) will be informed by the Affordable Housing Implementation Taskforce.[9]  In the UK, The Housing Finance Corporation (THFC) is established as a not-for-profit company; if that model were adopted here, legislation would not be necessary.

The Budget notes that ‘the Commonwealth Governance Policy requires sunset or review dates to be set for the creation of new Commonwealth bodies’.

Following a scoping study, the Government has decided to retain full ownership and control of Australian Hearing Services.[10] The Treasurer has indicated that the Commonwealth is ‘open to acquiring a larger share or outright ownership of Snowy Hydro, from the NSW and Victorian State Governments...’. [11]

Staffing

In the 2015–16 Budget, the Government undertook to maintain the size of the General Government Sector (GGS), excluding military and reserves, at around or below the 2006–07 Average Staffing Level (ASL) of 167,596.[12] The projected GGS ASL for 2017–18 of 167,064 is 15,441 less than the peak of 182,505 ASL in 2011–12, and is also close to the estimated GGS ASL for 2016–17 (167,248). Perhaps because they are yet to be established, the eight new entities listed above do not appear in the table of staffing numbers in Agency resourcing: budget paper no. 4: 2017–18. The extent to which staff of the eight entities might change the projected ASL numbers is not clear.

The Government has changed the way it counts staff at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). In the 2016–17 budget papers and portfolio budget statements (PBS), the AAT’s ASL included both staff and members of the AAT.[13] In the 2017–18 budget papers and PBS, the AAT’s ASL includes staff but excludes AAT members. The 2017–18 budget papers appear to estimate a non-AAT member staffing increase of 93 ASL for the AAT.[14]

Significant estimated staffing reductions for 2017–18 include 244 ASL at the Department of Health, attributed to ‘the department downsizing the workforce through a number of mechanisms including a voluntary redundancy program’, and 1,188 at the Department of Human Services (DHS), attributed to ‘departmental efficiencies, a reduction in the level of support required by the National Disability Insurance Agency and terminating budget measures’. The DHS reductions have attracted criticism from the Opposition and the Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU), with both contrasting the reductions with a budget measure proposing ‘piloting opportunities with existing accredited Government service providers to reduce call wait times by increasing Centrelink call centre capacity by 250 full-time equivalent roles’.[15]

Due to the NDIS transitioning from trial to full scheme, the National Disability Insurance Agency has an estimated increase of 611 ASL. The Department of Defence has an estimated increase of 620 civilian ASL due to ‘enhancements to intelligence, space and cyber security capabilities’ and other priorities outlined in the 2016 Defence White Paper. In February 2017, it was reported that the then Secretary of the Department of Defence had expressed displeasure that consultants, contractors and other service providers outnumbered departmental staff.[16] The Budget includes a measure that aims to:

achieve savings of $304.1 million out of $150.6 billion in Department of Defence (Defence) funding over four years from 2017–18 through efficiencies resulting from reductions in the numbers of consultants and contractors used in Defence, as well as limiting the costs of non-operational overseas and business travel.

Enterprise agreements

The salaries of the majority of public servants are determined in agency enterprise agreements. In general, agreements made in 2011 had a nominal expiry date of 30 June 2014, and to commence the negotiation process, a workplace Bargaining Policy was released in March 2014.[17] Since then, negotiations for new agreements have been protracted, and have included the issuing of a revised Bargaining Policy in November 2015.[18]

The Australian Public Service Commission has reported that, as at 4 April 2017, a total of 90 enterprise agreements had been agreed to in 86 Commonwealth agencies.[19] However, a media article on 4 May 2017 reported that enterprise agreements were still not in place at two agencies with significant numbers of employees—the Department of Human Services (29,835 ASL in 2016–17) and the Australian Taxation Office (17,901 ASL in 2016–17).[20]

In the 2017–18 budget papers, the Government reports:

Australian Bureau of Statistics data shows that over the last two years total wages and salaries in the Commonwealth public sector grew by 2.4 per cent compared to State Government which grew 6.1 per cent and Local Government which grew 5.9 per cent.

Property portfolio and decentralisation

‘Operation Tetris’ requires public sector agencies to fill vacant leased office space rather than entering into new leases or renewing expiring leases. The Government anticipates that Tetris will yield savings of ‘nearly $300 million’ over the next ten years.

On the decentralisation of non-policy Commonwealth entities to regional areas, the budget papers state that ‘business cases for entities being considered for relocation are expected to be completed by December 2017’. No financial impact of decentralisation is specified.

In relation to the overseas property portfolio within the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), one budget measure proposes the centralisation of portfolio management, including ‘the development of a common office and residential accommodation strategy’. The cost will be met from within DFAT’s existing resources, and the benefits will include opportunities to ‘capture economies of scale in service provision’.

Parliamentary budget measures

The Budget provides $12.4 million to the Department of the House of Representatives and $15.0 million to the Department of the Senate over four years from 2017–18 to ‘strengthen the capacity of the departments to provide assistance to Senators and Parliamentarians’, including ‘further support to Parliamentary committees’.

The Independent Parliamentary Expenses Authority is funded with $13.2 million over five years from 2016–17.



[1].          Departmental funds are generally intended to cover agency running costs such as salaries and the purchase or lease of equipment and property. In contrast, administered funds are those administered by a Commonwealth entity on behalf of the Government. They usually relate to activities governed by eligibility rules and conditions established by the Government or Parliament—such as grants, subsidies and benefit payments.

[2].          Department of Finance and Deregulation (DoFD), Report of the review of the measures of agency efficiencies, DoFD, March 2011, pp. 21–22.

[3].          Australian Government, Agency resourcing: budget paper no. 4: 2016–17, p. 2.

[4].          For more on this measure, see C Ey, ‘Higher education reform’, Budget review 2017–18, Research paper series, 2016–17, Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2017. The budget figures in this brief have been taken from the following document unless otherwise sourced: Australian Government, Agency measures: budget paper no. 2: 2017–18, pp. 63, 83, 98, 99, 102, 137, 139, 141, 147, 154, 162, 169, 189; Australian Government, Agency resourcing: budget paper no. 4: 2017–18, pp. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 79, 127, 134, 136, 137, 138, 139.

[5].          Report of the review of the measures of agency efficiencies, op. cit., p. 20.

[6].          Completed Functional and Efficiency Reviews are listed in Agency resourcing: budget paper no. 4: 2017–18, p. 6.

[7].          First Principles Review of Defence, Creating one Defence, Department of Defence, [2015].

[8].          S Morrison (Treasurer), Budget speech 2017–18, p. 4.

[9].          For options for establishing Commonwealth entities, see the Department of Finance website and P Hamilton, ‘A new way to set up a Commonwealth organisation’, FlagPost, Parliamentary Library blog, 29 June 2016.

[10].       Australian Government, Budget measures: budget paper no. 2: 2014–15, 2014, p. 117.

[11].       Budget speech 2017–18, op. cit., p. 4; Australian Government, Budget strategy and outlook: budget paper no. 1: 2017–18, p. 1–21.

[12].       The General Government Sector comprises government departments and agencies that provide non-market public services, or involve the transfer or redistribution of income, and are funded mainly through taxes. Budget strategy and outlook: budget paper no. 1: 2017–18, op. cit., p. 10–38. Average Staffing Level (ASL) is a method of counting that adjusts for casual and part-time staff in order to show the average number of full-time equivalent employees. ASL is almost always a lower figure than a headcount of actual employees. In this discussion of ASL, GGS figures exclude military and reserves.

[13].       Australian Government, Agency resourcing: budget paper no. 4: 2016–17, p. 130, and Australian Government, Portfolio budget statements 2016–17: budget related paper no. 1.2: Attorney-General’s Portfolio, op. cit., p. 44.

[14].       Australian Government, Portfolio budget statements 2017–18: budget related paper no. 1.2: Attorney-General’s Portfolio, p. 44.

[15].       L Burney (Shadow Minister for Human Services), Tudge to slash almost 1,200 DHS jobs, media release, 10 May 2017; Community and Public Sector Union, Turnbull Budget bad for Centrelink, doubles down on disastrous cuts, media release, 9 May 2017.

[16].       N Towell, ‘Public service boss bares his teeth’, Canberra Times, 20 February 2017, p. 4.

[17].       Australian Public Service Commission (APSC), Australian Public Service bargaining framework: supporting guidance, APSC, Canberra, 2011, p. 8; APSC, ‘Australian government public sector workplace bargaining policy’, APSC website.

[18].       APSC, ‘Bargaining policy 2015’, APSC website.

[19].       APSC, ‘Agencies with enterprise agreements’, APSC website.

[20].       N Towell, ‘ATO backs down on work conditions’, Canberra Times, 4 May 2017, p. 5.

 

All online articles accessed May 2017. 

For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.


© Commonwealth of Australia

Creative commons logo

Creative Commons

With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, and to the extent that copyright subsists in a third party, this publication, its logo and front page design are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia licence.

In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.

To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.

Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.

This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.

Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Enquiry Point for referral.  

Top