Updated 24 October 2013
PDF version [502KB]
Deirdre McKeown
Politics and Public Administration Section
Contents
Introduction
Background
Oath or affirmation
Increase in senators and members making an affirmation
Graph 1: Percentage of senators making oaths and affirmations from 1901
Graph 2: Percentage of members making oaths and affirmations from 1901
Graph 3: Total percentage of all MPs making oaths and affirmations since 1901
Prime ministers and ministers making an affirmation
Specific oaths and affirmations
Governor-General
Members of Parliament
Recent attempt to change the oath and affirmation
Prime minister, minister and parliamentary secretary
Member of Federal Executive Council
Appendix 1: Oaths and affirmations in the Senate and the House of Representatives from 1901
Senate
Table 1: Number and percentage of senators making oaths and affirmations from 1901
House of Representatives
Table 2: Number and percentage of members making oaths and affirmations from 1901
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Cathy Madden, Rob Lundie, Mary Anne Neilsen, David Sullivan, Sophia Fernandes, Guy Woods, Janet Wilson, Martin Lumb, Dr Rosemary Laing, Angie Lilley, Chamber Research Office (House of Representatives), Adrienne Batts and National Archives of Australia staff for their valuable assistance in the preparation of this background note.
Abbreviations
ALP: Australian Labor Party
ANTI-SOC: Anti-Socialist Party
CP: Australian Country Party
FLP: Federal Labor Party
FT: Free Trade
Lang Lab: Lang Labor Party
Lib: Liberal Party of Australia
NAT: Nationalist Party
Introduction
After the federal election on 7 September 2013, members elected to serve in the House of Representatives and senators representing the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory will be sworn in on the first sitting day of the 44th Parliament. State senators will be sworn in on the first parliamentary sitting day after their term commences on 1 July 2014.
Members of the new parliament and the executive will choose to swear an oath or make an affirmation. This paper explains the choice and its history. It also contains details of oaths and affirmations made by the Governor-General, the Prime Minister, ministers and parliamentary secretaries and members of the Federal Executive Council since 1901.[1] Appendix 1 shows the number of senators and members who, since 1901, have made an oath or affirmation.
Background
By the time of Federation all colonial legislatures had enacted:
… legislation to allow any person to make an affirmation rather than take an oath of allegiance or of office, though some moved more slowly than others.[2]
There are a number of reasons why the Constitution included an affirmation as an alternative to the oath for members of the federal parliament. Members of the Constitutional Conventions of the 1890s used the Constitution of the United States as one of their models, and therefore took into account that Constitution’s provisions on the oaths and affirmations taken by the President and others appointed or elected to public office.[3]
Another, and perhaps stronger reason, is that:
The option of taking an affirmation was imported to Australia out of English law, where it has existed since the Act of Toleration of 1689. The 1689 provision formalised what was in any case becoming common practice in at least some areas. However, it was introduced out of respect for the consciences not of atheists, but of Quakers …
It was not until 1888 that English law unequivocally extended the same choice to atheists … By Federation, the affirmation’s applicability to atheists had gained a measure of acceptance.[4]
During the Constitutional Conventions there was very little discussion of proposed section 42, requiring the making of an oath or affirmation, or the wording of the oath and affirmation in the schedule to the Constitution. Both were accepted without a formal vote. There was certainly no discussion about whether or not to include an affirmation. Political scientist and academic Dr Marion Maddox notes that:
… the Australasian Conventions simply assum[ed] their [oath and affirmation] equal legitimacy without debate.[5]
Apart from the constitutional requirement that Federal Executive Councillors be sworn as members of Executive Council there was no suggestion that the Constitution should include provisions on oaths or affirmations to be taken by the Governor-General or by persons appointed to other offices within the executive branch of federal government.[6]
The power of the oath taken by members of parliament was evident in 1920 when the Parliament used the ‘first and only exercise of its power, derived from the House of Commons, to expel one of its own members’.[7]
Nationalist Prime Minister William Hughes moved a motion to expel Hugh Mahon, ALP member for Kalgoorlie (WA), from the House of Representatives. Hughes moved:
That, in the opinion of this House, the honorable member for Kalgoorlie, the Hon. Hugh Mahon, having, by seditious and disloyal utterances at a public meeting on Sunday last, been guilty of conduct unfitting him to remain a member of this House, and inconsistent with the oath of allegiance which he has taken as a member of this House, be expelled [from] this House.[8]
Labor members did not support the motion. Frank Anstey, member for Bourke (Vic), warned that:
This Parliament is not the judge of offences against the law; it is for the Courts of the country to judge them; and it is for the people who have elected us to Parliament to judge us. You have no ethical right to do what is proposed to be done. Your only right is that of might. I do not blame you for the exercise of that might because in politics there are no ethics. You are, therefore, simply laying down a precedent, of which you may be the victim …[9]
Anstey highlighted the problems that can occur in swearing an oath of allegiance to the Crown rather than the member’s own country:
In this Parliament am I called upon to be true to any definite principle, to uphold the rights and secure the well-being of the people, and to maintain Australian interests against all others? No. I am called here to be true and loyal, and to give my allegiance, not to my country, not to the people, but to the King, irrespective of his conduct, public or private …
What has been said [by Mahon] has been said about a Government, but, because Mr Mahon has said something about a [British] Government, he is held to have disparaged his King. By this logic, by this code of ethics, whoever reflects on the chosen Ministers of the King defames His Majesty, and, by pursuing that argument, you can arrive at the conclusion that no man can criticise the King’s Ministers without being liable to the punishment which it is proposed to mete out to the honourable member for Kalgoorlie.[10]
Hugh Mahon expressed a similar sentiment in a letter to Prime Minister Hughes:
My criticism, which was confined to the acts of British Ministers and their agents in Ireland, made no reference whatever to the Sovereign. I am not aware that the oath of an Australian parliamentarian binds him in allegiance to Mr Lloyd George and his associates …[11]
The motion was carried 34 to 17. A subsequent motion moved by Hughes that Mahon’s seat ‘be declared vacant by his expulsion from this House’ was carried by the same margin.[12] Mahon was not successful when he stood as a candidate in the 1920 by-election for his seat of Kalgoorlie.
In 1987, the enactment of the Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987, removed the power of the Parliament to expel senators and members.
There is no difference in legal force between an oath and an affirmation. The basic difference is that oaths conclude with the phrase ‘So help me God!’ while those making an affirmation are required to solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare. [13]
It is still more common for members of parliament to choose to swear the oath rather than make an affirmation, and there has been a view that:
… the choice provides an index of religiosity … The assumption is that the religiously-committed would naturally swear on the Bible, while those without religious convictions would demur at asking the help of a God in whom they do not believe. In fact, the situation is considerably more complicated.[14]
It is interesting to note that a number of members of parliament who have chosen to make an affirmation have also held strong religious views.
The former Labor senator and minister, ambassador and now Catholic priest and Tasmanian Parliamentary Standards Commissioner, Michael Tate, chose, during his parliamentary career, to make an affirmation rather than swear an oath. In the Senate he spoke several times about this choice and the view that those who make an affirmation are atheists. On one occasion, in 1983, during debate on the Labor Government’s migration program, he referred to the reaction to the proposal that the reference to God and the Queen be removed from the oath of citizenship:
I was shocked to see in the Tasmanian Press an attack by Bishop Newell, an Anglican bishop, on this particular proposal. He claimed that only those who tend towards atheism would not wish to take the oath with the term ‘God’ within it. Even less defensible, he claimed, was the deletion of reference to the Queen, which of course is an Establishment view which confuses loyalty to the monarchy. I think that is an unfortunate comment to come from the lips of a bishop. But even more than being politically misguided, of course, his statement is theologically unsound. This is why I, as a Christian and as a senator, refused to take the oath in this chamber and took the affirmation. It is quite clear from Matthew 5:36 … that according to the prescription set down there one ought not to take an oath invoking some divine intervention in order to back up one’s integrity, validity or strength of one’s promises or undertakings … I for one will not allow claims that I would be an atheist cow me into taking an oath which I believe ought not to be taken.[15]
The following year Tate reacted to a statement attributed to then Queensland Premier, Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen. The latter was reported as saying:
We want people down there [in the federal parliament] who honour God and not atheists who won’t take their oath of office on the Bible.[16]
Michael Tate claimed to have been misrepresented:
The assumption that those senators who make an affirmation are atheists is unfounded and insulting. It is offensive to me personally in that it is not for Sir Joh to put me in one category or another depending on public manifestation of religiosity or piety. Not all of us think constant display of outward trappings of religion is to be equated with living according to Christian precepts. Further, his theology is wrong and his understanding of the scriptures defective. It is quite clear from St Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount, chapter 5, versus 33-37 … that Christians should not invoke an oath to bolster their undertakings or truthfulness. A plain yes or no is all that is required of a Christian. I refuse to take the oath precisely because of my understanding of that injunction.[17]
In an interview with Dr Marion Maddox, Liberal Senator and later Member of the House of Representatives, Kathryn Sullivan, described her experience as an ‘unreconstructed Methodist’:
As a Senator, she chose to be sworn in by affirmation rather than by oath, emphasising that she had done so for theological reasons in keeping with her Dissenting traditions. When she moved to the House of Representatives (as member for Moncrieff), an unauthorised leaflet circulated in her electorate implying that her use of the affirmation indicated impiety. After careful thought, she decided that if her rural electors were upset by the affirmation, she would change, and has taken an oath ever since.[18]
The first Labor senator to affirm was William Senior (SA) who was elected to the Senate on 31 May 1913. When he died in 1926, an obituary described Senior’s links to the church:
He entered the Primitive Methodist ministry, and served for a few years. Although he relinquished the ministry, he continued as a Methodist local preacher, until his death, when he had served in that capacity about 50 years.[19]
One prominent member of the House of Representatives who made an affirmation was former Country Party leader, minister and Speaker, Archie Cameron (SA). It was reported that Cameron:
… immediately became the focus of public attention by making an affirmation instead of swearing the oath of allegiance.[20]
Cameron made an affirmation nine times, from 1934 to 1956. In 1950 the Sydney Morning Herald noted Cameron’s preference to make an affirmation of allegiance. The newspaper stated that:
Usually people who prefer to make an affirmation rather than swear on the Bible, belong to non-Christian religions or are unbelievers. Mr Cameron is neither. He is a deeply religious man.[21]
When asked why he didn’t take the oath, the newspaper reported that Cameron replied:
… if a man’s word is worthless no amount of oath-taking will make him worthy.[22]
The graphs below and tables in Appendix 1 show that, since Federation, the number of senators and members making an affirmation has increased in both chambers.[23]
In 1901 all 75 members of the House of Representatives elected to swear the oath. At the 2010 election, of the 150 members, 112 or 75% swore the oath and 38 or 25% made the affirmation. In the Senate, in 1901, 34 or 94% of senators swore the oath and two senators or 6% made the affirmation and, of the 36 senators elected at the 2010 election, 22 or 61% chose to swear the oath and 14 or 39% affirmed.
The overall trend in Graphs 1 and 2 shows an increase in senators and members making an affirmation but the increase in affirmations has been greater in the Senate than the House of Representatives. In the Senate the trend towards making an affirmation commenced in the mid-1960s, a decade earlier than in the House of Representatives. It is interesting to note that in the Senate, the average age of a senator elected at the 1964 election was 51.4 years compared with 45.5 for senators elected at the 1967 election.[24] These graphs also show, in election year 2010 compared with election year 2007, an increase in affirmations made in the Senate and a small decrease in those made in the House of Representatives.
Graph 3 shows that, since 1901, seven per cent of all senators have made an affirmation compared with four per cent of all members. Graphs 1 and 2 suggest that there is no correlation between Labor and Liberal prime ministers and the percentage of oaths and affirmations. Nor is there a correlation between the two Chambers. Since 1901 the highest percentage of senators to make an affirmation (41%) occurred in 1978 with a Liberal prime minister in power, while the highest percentage of members making an affirmation (29%) occurred in 2008 with a Labor prime minister in power.
Graph 1: Percentage of senators making oaths and affirmations from 1901
Source: Parliamentary Library estimates
Graph 2: Percentage of members making oaths and affirmations from 1901
Source: Parliamentary Library estimates
Graph 3: Total percentage of all MPs making oaths and affirmations since 1901
Source: Parliamentary Library estimates
It is evident from the names recorded in official parliamentary publications reproduced with party affiliation in Appendix 1 and media reports on recent swearing-in ceremonies, that the majority of those making an affirmation are members of the Australian Labor Party.[25] This was not always the case in the early decades of the 20th century. The first senators to affirm in 1901 were Josiah Symon (SA) and James Walker (NSW), Free Traders and, from 1906, both members of the Anti-Socialist Party.
In 1907 Edward Archer (Qld), a member of the Anti-Socialist Party, became the first member of the House of Representatives to make the affirmation. He was followed by Labor members Michael Considine (NSW) in 1917 and Edward Holloway (Vic) and Arthur Lewis (Vic) in 1929.
It is likely that Archie Cameron (see reference above) was the first minister to make an affirmation. In 1938, for example, his official affirmation (on an official oath form with handwritten alterations) read:
I, Archie Galbraith Cameron do solemnly and sincerely declare that I will well and truly serve His Majesty King George the Sixth on the Office of Postmaster-General.[26]
The first time a number of ministers made an affirmation occurred when the full ministry of then Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, was sworn in on 19 December 1972. The following ministers made an affirmation: Members of the House of Representatives Jim Cairns, Tom Uren, Ken Wreidt, Kep Enderby, Doug Everingham and Moss Cass; and Senators Lionel Murphy, Jim Cavanagh, Jim McClelland and John Wheeldon.[27]
In his study on the religious beliefs of Australia’s prime ministers, Dr John Warhurst has categorised prime ministers according to their faith. He identifies two categories associated with agnosticism and the prime ministers he allocates to these categories are:
… articulate agnostics, who speak publicly about their disbelief (Hughes, Curtin, Whitlam, Hawke and Gillard), and nominal agnostics (Holt), who may be judged by their actions.[28]
Dr Warhurst estimates that fewer than half (11) of Australia’s 26 prime ministers ‘have taken their religion seriously’.[29] Despite a number of her predecessors sharing her non-religious views, when Julia Gillard was sworn in as Prime Minister on 24 June 2010, she became the first prime minister to make an affirmation of office.[30]
He suggests a reason former Prime Minister Gillard being the first to affirm was that:
… despite the fact there would have been earlier prime ministers like Curtin and maybe even Billy Hughes who saw themselves as non-religious … my guess is there would have been much more of a fuss if they had refused to take the oath on the Bible.[31]
House of Representatives Practice states:
The Letters Patent provide that the appointment of a person as Governor-General shall be by Commission which must be published in the official gazette of the Commonwealth.[32] They also provide that a person appointed to be Governor-General shall take the oath or affirmation of allegiance and the oath or affirmation of office. These acts are to be performed by the Chief Justice or another justice of the High Court. The ceremonial swearing-in of a new Governor-General has traditionally taken place in the Senate Chamber. [33]
In 1901 the first Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, the Earl of Hopetoun, swore three oaths: an oath of allegiance, an official oath and a judicial oath. These oaths were:
Oath of Allegiance
I, John Adrian Louis, Earl of Hopetoun, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her Heirs and Successors according to law. So help me, God.
Official Oath
I, John Adrian Louis, Earl of Hopetoun, do swear that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Victoria in the Office of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. So help me, God.
Judicial Oath
I, John Adrian Louis, Earl of Hopetoun, do swear that I will well and truly serve Our Sovereign Lady Queen Victoria in the Office of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and that I will do right to all manner of people after the Laws and usages of this Commonwealth, without fear or favour, affection or ill-will. So help me, God.[34]
By the time the Right Honourable William Humble Ward, Earl of Dudley, was sworn in as Australia’s third Governor-General on 9 September 1908, the Judicial Oath appears to have been dropped. The Earl of Dudley swore an Oath of Allegiance and an Oath of Office. The latter combined the Official Oath and the Judicial Oath and is very similar to the Oath of Office sworn by the current Governor-General.[35]
To mark the appointment of the current Governor-General a Special Government Gazette published the Queen’s Commission, the Oath of Allegiance and Oath of Office sworn by the new Governor-General, Quentin Bryce, on 5 September 2008, and her Proclamation announcing that she had ‘assumed office accordingly’.[36]
The oaths sworn by the current Governor-General are:
Oath of Allegiance
I, Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law. So Help Me God!
Oath of Office
I, Quentin Alice Louise Bryce, do swear that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law, in the office of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of the Commonwealth of Australia, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. So Help Me God![37]
The Australian Constitution requires that those elected to the Senate and the House of Representatives swear or solemnly affirm their allegiance to the Crown. Senators and members are required to both ‘make and subscribe’ (sign) an oath or affirmation. The same oath and affirmation have been used since Federation and can only be changed by constitutional referendum.
Section 42 of the Constitution states:
Every senator and every member of the House of Representatives shall before taking his seat make and subscribe before the Governor-General, or some person authorised by him, an oath or affirmation of allegiance in the form set forth in the schedule to the Constitution.[38]
The Schedule to the Constitution contains the wording of the oath and affirmation:
Oath
I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law. So Help Me God!
Affirmation
I, A.B., do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, Her heirs and successors according to law.[39]
NOTE - The name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time.[40]
In the Senate, a senator must be sworn in before sitting in the Senate or participating in its proceedings, but there is nothing to prevent a senator performing other official functions before taking the oath or affirmation. Thus the Senate appoints senators to committees, and senators may participate in the proceedings of those committees, before they have been sworn.[41]
In the House of Representatives a member cannot take part in any proceedings of the House until sworn in. This includes not participating in the work of committees until members have been sworn.[42]
At the first meeting of a new Parliament the oath or affirmation is normally administered by a person authorised by the Governor-General, usually a Justice of the High Court. After reading the judge’s authorisation to the House, the Clerk of the House of Representatives tables the returns to the writs for the general election, then calls members elected, usually in groups of 10 to 12, to the Table of the House to make the oath or affirmation and subscribe the oath or affirmation form. Members not sworn in at this stage may be sworn in later in the day’s proceedings or on a subsequent sitting day by the Speaker, who receives a commission from the Governor-General to administer the oath or affirmation. Members elected at by-elections during the Parliament are also sworn in by the Speaker.[43]
Advice from the Attorney-General’s Department has confirmed that members making the oath of allegiance are not bound to use the authorised version of the Bible:
The oath of allegiance need not necessarily be made on the authorised version of the Bible, although this has been the common practice. A Member may recite the oath while holding another form of Christian holy book, or, in respect of a non-Christian faith, a book or work of such a nature. The essential requirement is that every Member taking an oath should take it in a manner which affects his or her conscience regardless of whether a holy book is used or not.[44]
In September 2010, Ed Husic, Member for Chifley (NSW), became the first Muslim to be sworn into the federal parliament. The Age reported that:
For the first time an MP, Labor’s Ed Husic, took the oath while holding a Koran rather than a Bible. The Koran belonged to his parents, immigrants from Bosnia.[45]
The problems that can arise when members of parliament are not sworn correctly were evident in June 1901, one month after the commencement of the first Parliament. Donald Cameron, member for the electorate of Tasmania, claimed, in a personal explanation, that:
… a large proportion of the members of this House, including myself, have not been properly sworn.[46]
Cameron said that when he arrived with other members to be sworn by the Governor-General, he:
… saw a number of honorable members sign their names on sheets of vellum before they attended. I did not do so. When I arrived with other honorable members in the room where we were to be sworn in, as I understood, I listened most attentively; but I was never called up … and I was never asked to make and subscribe the oath of allegiance.[47]
Following discussion, the then Prime Minister, Edmund Barton, stated that:
I submit to the House that the honorable member should tender himself to the Speaker to be sworn now, in order to save any question arising hereafter.[48]
The Speaker asked Mr Cameron to ‘take a seat behind the Bar of the House’ while the necessary papers were obtained.[49] House of Representatives Debates records that:
The honorable member for Tasmania, Mr Cameron, having re-entered the chamber, subscribed the oath.[50]
In September 1901, Attorney-General, Alfred Deakin, advised that, in his opinion, the direction in section 42 of the Constitution, that a member of the federal Parliament ‘shall before taking his seat make and subscribe’ the oath of allegiance, was ‘directory and not absolute’ in the sense that ‘neglect of the requirement does not invalidate what is done afterwards’.[51] This has been interpreted to mean that:
… the validity of parliamentary proceedings would not be affected by the participation in them of members who had not complied with s 42.[52]
Members of the federal parliament do not incur a penalty if they participate in proceedings of the Senate or the House of Representatives without fulfilling the requirement of section 42. This is very different to the approach in the United Kingdom Parliament where:
Should a Member take part in parliamentary proceedings without having sworn the oath or made the affirmation, the penalty is £500 for every offence, together with vacation of his or her seat …
There have been cases where Members and Peers have inadvertently neglected to take the oath and they have sometimes been relieved of the consequences of their omission by an Act of Indemnity. Such an Act cannot, however, prevent a Member’s seat from being immediately vacated; a new writ must be moved for at once.[53]
The most recent suggestion to change the oath and affirmation was included in the 2001 House of Representatives Procedure Committee report on its inquiry into procedures for the opening of Parliament.[54] The Committee recommended that:
… the form of the oath and affirmation of allegiance taken by Members and Senators be reviewed with a view to including recognition of the people of Australia and that a proposed new form be put to the people in a referendum.[55]
The Committee did not include a form of words but suggested that:
Any review might initially consider the versions passed by both Houses (but not approved at referendum) in the Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) Bill 1999 resulting from the 1998 Constitutional Convention.[56]
The Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) Bill 1999 contained the following oath and affirmation for members of Parliament:
Oath
Under God I swear that I will be loyal to the Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian people, whose laws I will uphold.
Affirmation
I solemnly and sincerely affirm that I will be loyal to the Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian people, whose laws I will uphold.[57]
The Government did not accept the Committee’s recommendations:
The government considers that the current procedures for the opening of the Parliament continue to reflect Australia’s parliamentary traditions and democratic heritage. Accordingly, the government does not propose to seek changes to existing procedures at this time.[58]
The prime minister, ministers and parliamentary secretaries make the oath or affirmation of allegiance (as members of parliament) and, at the ministerial swearing-in, an additional oath or affirmation of office and the Executive Councillor’s Oath or affirmation (see below for details of the latter).
The prime minister, who makes the same oath or affirmation as his or her ministry, determines the form of the oath and affirmation of office which can be changed according to the preference of the prime minister of the day. These oaths and affirmations are administered by the Governor-General. An official note on the date of the swearing in of the second Gorton ministry on 12 November 1969 stated that:
There is no constitutional requirement as to when Ministers should be sworn in following an election – but it is necessary that they be sworn in in time for the meeting of the Parliament.[59]
There is also no legal requirement that the ministry, including the prime minister, take an oath or affirmation of office nor that this include a statement of allegiance to the Crown. A former Official Secretary to the Governor-General has noted that:
There is … no constitutional or statutory prescription of the oath of allegiance to be taken by Ministers of the Crown, and its use for this purpose was governed by nothing more than custom and tradition.[60]
The Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet has noted that when the government is returned at a general election, the prime minister can choose whether or not to resign his or her commission. It is usual practice for a re-elected prime minister to submit his or her resignation (which by convention automatically results in the termination of other ministers’ appointments) and at the same time seek a fresh commission from the Governor-General.[61]
In 1901, the oaths taken by the first ministry were: the oath of allegiance (the same oath was taken twice: as a member of the ministry and as a member of parliament), the official oath and the Executive Councillor’s oath.
The Official Oath sworn by the ministry in 1901 (no minister made an affirmation) was:
I [Minister’s name] do swear that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Victoria in the Office of [name] So Help Me God[62]
Following Queen Victoria’s death on 22 January 1901 and the accession of Edward VII, Executive Councillors and Ministers of State, who had been sworn in on 1 January 1901, were re-appointed and re-sworn at Government House, Melbourne, on 26 April 1901.[63]
When the first Menzies ministry was sworn in on 19 December 1949 the official oath was called the oath of office and according to a newspaper report of the ceremony only ministers ‘who had not had previous cabinet experience were called upon to make three oaths’.[64] This practice was in place as early as 1903 when the first Deakin ministry was sworn in on 24 September 1903. A historical note that accompanied the official papers relating to the swearing in of these ministers stated that:
Only new Ministers … subscribed the Oath of Allegiance, the Official oath and the Executive Councillor’s Oath … Ministers from the previous administration took only the Official Oath.[65]
On 5 July 1905, when the second Deakin ministry was sworn in the historical note stated:
All Ministers who had been in previous administrations as well as all new Ministers took the Oath of Allegiance, the Official Oath and the Executive Councillor’s Oath. This is the first occasion on which this has occurred.[66]
By 1908, when the first Fisher ministry was sworn in on 13 November 1908, the practice had resumed with the historical note stating that ‘[o]nly new Ministers subscribed all three oaths’.[67]
For the next four decades new ministers continued to make the three oaths or affirmations and the oath and affirmation of office remained largely unchanged:
Oath of Office
I [full name], do swear that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law, in the office of [Minister, Portfolio]. So Help Me God!
Affirmation of Office
I [full name], do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Her heirs and successors according to law, in the office of [Minister, Portfolio].
In April 1993, when, as the result of a by-election, Michael Lavarch was sworn in as Attorney- General, Prime Minister Paul Keating changed the oath and affirmation of office:
Ministers no longer promised to serve the Queen but to serve the Commonwealth of Australia. The oath of allegiance was dropped altogether as part of the swearing-in ceremony … on the grounds that it was sworn before taking a seat in the Parliament, as required by the Constitution, and that its repetition before taking ministerial office was superfluous.[68]
Oath of Office (1993)
I [full name], do swear that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia in the office of [Minister, Portfolio]. So Help Me God!
Affirmation of Office (1993)
I [full name], do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia in the office of [Minister, Portfolio].
When John Howard became Prime Minister in 1996, he also made changes to the oath and affirmation of office. He combined the oath of office with ‘a partial return to the traditional oath of allegiance’.[69] The reference to the Commonwealth of Australia was replaced by reference to ‘the people of Australia’ and allegiance to the sovereign was reinstated but not to her heirs and successors.
Oath of Office (1996)
I, [Minister's full name], do swear that I will well and truly serve the people of Australia in the office of [position] and that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second. So help me God!
Affirmation of Office (1996)
I, [Minister's full name], do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the people of Australia in the office of [position] and that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second.[70]
In 2007, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd reinstated the Commonwealth of Australia, added the reference to ‘her people and her lands’ and dropped allegiance to the sovereign.
Oath of Office (2007)
I, [Minister’s full name], do swear that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia, her land and her people in the office of [position]. So help me God!
Affirmation of Office (2007)
I, [Minister’s full name], do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia, her land and her people in the office of [position]
In September 2010 Prime Minister Julia Gillard dropped reference to ‘her land and her people’ from the oath and affirmation.
Oath of Office (2010)
I, [Minister’s full name], do swear that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia in the office of [position]. So help me God!
Affirmation of Office (2010)
I, [Minister’s full name], do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the Commonwealth of Australia in the office of [position][71]
In September 2013 Prime Minister Tony Abbott reinstated the oath and affirmation used by John Howard, with the addition of the phrase ‘Queen of Australia’.
Oath of Office (2013)
I, [Minister's full name], do swear that I will well and truly serve the people of Australia in the office of [position] and that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Australia. So help me God!
Affirmation of Office (2013)
I, [Minister's full name], do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will well and truly serve the people of Australia in the office of [position] and that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Australia.[72]
The requirement that members of the Federal Executive Council make an oath or affirmation is prescribed in the Constitution, but not the form of the oath or affirmation. Ministers make the oath or affirmation of an Executive Councillor before being sworn in as a Minister of State. Once sworn as a member of Executive Council, ministers are not required to make this oath or affirmation again.
The Constitution states:
There shall be a Federal Executive Council to advise the Governor-General in the government of the Commonwealth, and the members of the Council shall be chosen and summoned by the Governor-General and sworn as Executive Councillors, and shall hold office during his pleasure.[73]
The Governor-General may appoint officers to administer such Departments of State of the Commonwealth as the Governor-General in Council may establish.
Such officers shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor-General. They shall be members of the Federal Executive Council, and shall be the Queen’s Ministers of State for the Commonwealth.[74]
The first Prime Minister, Edmund Barton, swore the following Executive Councillor’s Oath:
I, Edmund Barton, being chosen and admitted of Her Majesty’s Executive Council in the Commonwealth of Australia, do swear that I will to the best of my judgment at all times when thereto required freely give my counsel and advice to the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia for the time being for the good management of the public affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; that I will not directly or indirectly reveal such matters as shall be debated in Council and committed to my secrecy, but that I will in all things be a true and faithful Councillor. So help me, God.[75]
During World War II, the Governor-General determined the form of the oath and affirmation to be taken by each member of the Australian Advisory War Council:[76]
I, …….. being chosen and admitted of His Majesty's Australian Advisory War Council in the Commonwealth of Australia, do swear (or, in the ease of affirmation, solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare) that I will to the best of my judgment at all times when thereto required freely give my counsel and advice to the Governor-General or Officer Administering the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia for the time being with respect to matters relating to the defence of the Commonwealth of Australia or the prosecution of the war, that I will not directly or indirectly reveal such matters as shall be debated in Council and committed to my secrecy, but that I will in all things be a true and faithful Councillor. So help me, God! [In the case of affirmation these words to be omitted.][77]
In 1946, the Executive Councillor’s Oath was still very similar to the one sworn by ministers in the first ministry (differences are in italics):
I, ……… being chosen and admitted of His Majesty’s Executive Council in the Commonwealth of Australia, do swear that I will to the best of my judgment at all times when thereto required freely give my counsel and advice to the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia or Officer Administering the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia for the time being for the good management of the public affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; that I will not directly or indirectly reveal such matters as shall be debated in Council and committed to my secrecy, but that I will in all things be a true and faithful Councillor. So help me, God.[78]
In 1977, Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser provided the words of the oath taken by a member of the Federal Executive Council. The oath was still very similar to the one sworn in 1946 (differences are in italics):
I, ......... being chosen and summoned by the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia as a member of the Federal Executive Council, do swear that I will to the best of my judgment at all times when thereto required freely give my counsel and advice to the Governor-General or the person Administering the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia for the time being for the good management of the public affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia and that I will not directly or indirectly reveal such matters as shall be debated in Council and committed to my secrecy, but that I will in all things be a true and faithful Councillor. So help me God! [79]
In April 1993, Prime Minister Paul Keating simplified the wording of the Executive Councillor’s oath and affirmation.[80] The following wording was introduced by Paul Keating and used by Prime Ministers Howard, Rudd, and Abbott:
Executive Councillor’s Oath
I, [NAME], being chosen and summoned by the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia to be a member of the Federal Executive Council, do swear that I will, when required, advise the Governor-General (or the person for the time being administering the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia) to the best of my judgment, and consistently with the good government of the Commonwealth of Australia, and that I will not disclose the confidential deliberations of the Council. So help me God!
Executive Councillor’s Affirmation
I, [NAME], being chosen and summoned by the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia as a member of the Federal Executive Council, do solemnly and sincerely affirm and declare that I will, when required, advise the Governor-General (or the person for the time being administering the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia) to the best of my judgment, and consistently with the good government of the Commonwealth of Australia, and that I will not disclose the confidential deliberations of the Council.[81]
It is likely that the secrecy clause in the Executive Councillor’s oath and affirmation, ‘I will not disclose the confidential deliberations of the Council’, is derived from the Oath sworn by members of the Privy Council in the United Kingdom. The relevant provisions in the latter oath are that:
… [you] will keep secret all matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors you will not reveal it unto him but will keep the same until such time as, by the consent of Her Majesty or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof.[82]
In 1977, Prime Minister, Malcolm Fraser was asked about the wording of the oath or affirmation taken by members of the Privy Council. He responded:
It is the practice in respect of the Privy Council that oaths taken by Privy Councillors are regarded as being confidential between Her Majesty and those who take them.[83]
The wording of the Privy Council Oath was officially made public in 1998, in answer to a written question in the House of Commons.[84]
Note: 1901–1903 data are from Senate Journals, 1904–2012: dates and number of senators taking the oath and affirmation are from the Senate Test Rolls.[85] Shaded rows indicate oaths and affirmations taken at the start of the Parliament, either on the first day or shortly afterwards. The latter figures are shown as “+ (number)”. Rows not shaded indicate senators appointed to a casual vacancy under section 15 of the Constitution. These numbers are not included in the statistics. From time to time, the names of senators electing to make an affirmation are recorded in official parliamentary publications. These names are recorded in the table below.
Table 1: Number and percentage of senators making oaths and affirmations from 1901
|
Date sworn or affirmed
|
Oath
|
Affirmation
|
Total
(oaths and affirmations)
|
% of senators affirming
|
Senate size
|
Election
|
|
9.5.1901
|
34
|
2
Josiah Symon, SA, FT, Anti-Soc from 1906
James Walker, NSW, FT[86]
|
36
|
6
|
36
|
HoR and Senate
29-30 March 1901
|
|
26.5.1903
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6.1903
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.10.1903
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3.1904
|
18
|
|
18
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
16 December 1903
|
|
9.3.1904
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1.1907
|
15
|
2
Josiah Symon, SA, FT, Anti-Soc from 1906
James Walker, NSW, FT[87]
|
17
|
12
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
12 December 1906
|
|
17.3.1908
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7.1910
|
18
|
|
18
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
13 April 1910 (from 1910 election Senate terms commenced on 1 July)
|
|
14.8.1912
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7.1913
|
16
|
1
William Senior, SA, ALP, NAT from 1917 [88]
|
17 + 1
|
6
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
31 May 1913
|
|
13.8.1913
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.10.1914
|
33
|
2
William Senior, SA, ALP, NAT from 1917
Albert Blakey, Vic, ALP [89]
|
35 + 1
|
6
|
36
|
Double Dissolution
5 September 1914
|
|
21.10.1914
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3.1917
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.6.1917
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7.1917
|
17
|
1
William Senior, SA, ALP, NAT from 1917 [90]
|
18
|
6
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
5 May 1917
|
|
26.6.1919
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5.1920
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7.1920
|
16
|
|
16 + 2
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
13 December 1919
|
|
21.7.1920
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.6.1922
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.2.1923
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.1923
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
16 December 1922
|
|
26.3.1924
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.7.1924
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6.1925
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8.1925
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8.1925
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.1.1926
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.1926
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7.1926
|
15
|
|
15 + 1
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
14 November 1925
|
|
9.7.1926
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9.1927
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.4.1928
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6.1928
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8.1928
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.1929
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8.1929
|
14
|
1
Arthur Rae, NSW, ALP, Lang Lab from 1931[91]
|
15
|
7
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
17 November 1928
|
|
15.4.1931
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5.1931
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2.1932
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3.1932
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.8.1932
|
14
|
1
Joseph Collings, Qld, FLP, ALP from 1937[92]
|
15
|
7
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
19 December 1931
|
|
16.11.1932
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.5.1933
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.10.1934
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3.1935
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9.1935
|
15
|
|
15
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
15 September 1934
|
|
2.10.1935
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9.1936
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9.1937
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.11.1937
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7.1938
|
13
|
1
Joseph Collings, Qld, FLP, ALP from 1937[93]
|
14 + 1
|
7
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
23 October 1937
|
|
26.9.1938
|
2[94]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.11.1940
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7.1941
|
17
|
|
17 + 1
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
21 September 1941
|
|
12.11.1941
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12.1942
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.9.1943
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.7.1944
|
16
|
1
Joseph Collings, Qld, FLP, ALP from 1937[95]
|
17
|
6
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
21 August 1943
|
|
22.11.1944
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.6.1946
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.11.1946
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.10.1947
|
17
|
|
17
|
|
36
|
HoR + Half-Senate
28 September 1946
|
|
22.2.1950
|
24
|
|
42
|
|
60
|
HoR + Half-Senate
10 December 1949, Senate increased to 60 seats
|
|
6.7.1950
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6.1951
|
59
|
|
59 + 1
|
|
60
|
Double Dissolution 28 April 1951
|
|
16.10.1951
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.2.1952
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10.1952
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3.1953
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9.1953
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
60
|
Half-Senate
9 May 1953
|
|
9.9.1953
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9.1955
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.10.1955
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.2.1956
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.8.1956
|
29
|
|
29
|
|
60
|
HoR + Half-Senate
10 December 1955
|
|
27.8.1957
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8.1958
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8.1958
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2.1959
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.8.1959
|
28
|
|
28
|
|
60
|
HoR + Half-Senate
22 November 1958
|
|
3.10.1961
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2.1962
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8.1962
|
29
|
|
29
|
|
60
|
HoR + Half-Senate
9 December 1961
|
|
16.10.1962
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.2.1964
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3.1965
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8.1965
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
60
|
Half-Senate
5 December 1964
|
|
8.3.1966
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.4.1966
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.10.1966
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2.1967
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.11.1967
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3.1968
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8.1968
|
26
|
4
|
30
|
13
|
60
|
Half-Senate
5 November 1967
|
|
27.5.1969
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.11.1969
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8.1970
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2.1971
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.3.1971
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8.1971
|
24
|
6
|
30
|
20
|
60
|
Half-Senate
21 November 1970
|
|
10.11.1971
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.2.1973
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.2.1974
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.7.1974
|
43
|
17
|
60
|
28
|
60
|
Double Dissolution 18 May 1974
|
|
4.3.1975
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9.1975
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2.1976
|
45
|
19
|
64
|
30
|
64
|
Double Dissolution 13 December 1975 Includes Territory senators[96]
|
|
8.12.1976
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2.1978
|
4
|
1
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
15.8.1978
|
19
|
13
|
32
|
41
|
64
|
HoR + Half-Senate
10 December 1977
|
|
18.3.1980
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.11.1980
|
3
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3.1981
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5.1981
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8.1981
|
21
|
9
|
30
|
30
|
64
|
HoR + Half-Senate
18 October 1980
|
|
21.4.1983
|
41
|
23
|
64
|
36
|
64
|
Double Dissolution
5 March 1983
|
|
24.5.1983
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.2.1985
|
14
|
3
|
17
|
18
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
1 December 1984 Senate increased to 76 seats
|
|
20.8.1985
|
24
|
11
|
35
|
31
|
|
|
|
19.3.1986
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.5.1986
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9.1986
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2.1987
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.9.1987
|
49
|
24
|
73 + 3
|
33
|
76
|
Double Dissolution 11 July 1987
|
|
6.10.1987
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10.1987
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2.1988
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8.1988
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.4.1989
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5.1990
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5.1990
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.1990
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.5.1990
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.8.1990
|
27
|
9
|
36
|
25
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
24 March 1990
|
|
12.12.1991
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9.1991
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3.1992
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6.1992
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5.1993
|
3
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8.1993
|
22
|
13
|
35
|
37
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
13 March 1993
|
|
30.8.1993
|
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
23.2.1994
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3.1994
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5.1994
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5.1995
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.5.1995
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.11.1995
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.4.1996
|
4
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.8.1996
|
26
|
10
|
36
|
28
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
2 March 1996
|
|
9.9.1996
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9.1996
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.1997
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.5.1997
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5.1997
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.9.1997
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.10.1997
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.6.1998
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.11.1998
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8.1999
|
25
|
11
|
36
|
30
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
3 October 1998
|
|
9.5.2000
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6.2000
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.10.2000
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.8.2001
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2.2001
|
4
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3.2002
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8.2002
|
22
|
14
|
36
|
39
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
10 November 2001
|
|
11.11.2002
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3.2003
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4.2004
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.11.2004
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5.2005
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8.2005
|
25
|
10
|
35 + 1
|
31
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
9 October 2004
|
|
16.8.2005
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9.2005
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5.2006
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5.2007
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6.2007
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.6.2007
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9.2007
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2.2008
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.5.2008
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.8.2008
|
25
|
10
|
35 + 1
|
28
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
24 November 2007
|
|
27.8.2008
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.3.2009
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.9.2010
|
3
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7.2011
|
22
|
13
|
35 + 1
|
39
|
76
|
HoR + Half-Senate
21 August 2010
|
|
16.8.2011
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.10.2011
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.3.2012
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5.2012
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.6.2012
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9.2012
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
The figures relate to oaths and affirmations taken at the start of the Parliament only, either on the first sitting day or shortly after. Where members are not present to be sworn in or make an affirmation by the Governor-General’s representative, but later take an oath/affirmation administered by the Speaker, those figures are shown as “+ (number)”.[97] From time to time, the names of members electing to make an affirmation are recorded in official parliamentary publications. These names are recorded in the table below.
Table 2: Number and percentage of members making oaths and affirmations from 1901
|
Parliament
(date of first sitting)
|
Oath
|
Affirmation
|
Total
(oaths and affirmations)
|
% of members affirming
|
Total no. electoral divisions
|
|
1st (9.5.1901)
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
2nd (2.3.1904)
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
3rd (20.2.1907)
|
69 + 5
|
1
(Edward Archer, Capricornia, Qld, Anti-Soc)[98]
|
75
|
1
|
75
|
|
4th (1.7.1910)
|
68 + 6
|
|
74[99]
|
|
75
|
|
5th (9.7.1913)
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
6th (8.10.1914)
|
69 + 5
|
|
74[100]
|
|
75
|
|
7th (14.6.1917)
|
66 + 7
|
1
(Michael Considine, Barrier, NSW, ALP)[101]
|
74[102]
|
1
|
75
|
|
8th (26.2.1920)
|
71 + 3
|
+ 1
(Michael Considine, Barrier, NSW, ALP)[103]
|
75
|
1
|
75
|
|
9th (28.2.1923)
|
74 + 2
|
|
76
|
|
76
|
|
10th (13.1.1926)
|
73 + 2
|
|
75[104]
|
|
76
|
|
11th (6.2.1929)
|
75 + 1
|
|
76
|
|
76
|
|
12th (20.11.1929)
|
70 + 3
|
2
(Edward Holloway, Flinders, Vic, ALP and Arthur Lewis, Corio, Vic, ALP)[105]
|
75[106]
|
3
|
76
|
|
13th (17.2.1932)
|
75
|
|
75
|
|
76
|
|
14th (23.10.1934)
|
72 + 2
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[107]
|
75
|
1
|
75
|
|
15th (30.11.1937)
|
71 +3
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[108]
|
75
|
1
|
75
|
|
16th (20.11.1940)
|
70 + 2
|
+ 1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[109]
|
73[110]
|
1
|
75
|
|
17th (23.9.1943)
|
71 + 3
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[111]
|
75
|
1
|
75
|
|
18th (6.11.1946)
|
73 +1
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[112]
|
75
|
1
|
75
|
|
19th (22.2.1950)
|
122
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[113]
|
123
|
0.8
|
123
|
|
20th (12.6.1951)
|
121 + 1
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP) [114]
|
123
|
0.8
|
123
|
|
21st (4.8.1954)
|
115 + 7
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[115]
|
123
|
0.8
|
123
|
|
22nd (15.2.1956)
|
119 +4
|
1
(Archie Cameron, Barker, SA, CP)[116]
|
124
|
0.8
|
124
|
|
23rd (17.2.1959)
|
123 + 1
|
|
124
|
|
124
|
|
24th (20.2.1962)
|
123 + 1
|
|
124
|
|
124
|
|
25th (25.2.1964)
|
123 + 1
|
|
124
|
|
124
|
|
26th (21.2.1967)
|
122 + 2
|
|
124
|
|
124
|
|
27th (25.11.1969)
|
119 + 2
|
4
(Dr Moss Cass, Maribyrnong, Vic, ALP, Frank Kirwan, Forrest, WA, ALP, Dr Dick Klugman, Prospect, NSW, ALP, Laurie Wallis, Grey, SA, ALP)[117]
|
125
|
3
|
125
|
|
28th (27.2.1973)
|
112 + 1
|
12
(Dr Jim Cairns, Lalor, Vic, ALP, Dr Moss Cass, Maribyrnong, Vic, ALP, John Coates, Denison, Tas, ALP, Kep Enderby, Canberra, ACT, ALP, Dr Douglas Everingham, Capricornia, Qld, ALP, Dr Richard Gun, Kingston, SA, ALP, Dr Dick Klugman, Prospect, NSW, ALP, Tony Lamb, La Trobe, Vic, ALP, Race Mathews, Casey, Vic, ALP, Tom Uren, Reid, NSW, ALP, Laurie Wallis, Grey, SA, ALP, Ralph Willis, Gellibrand, Vic, ALP)[118]
|
125
|
10
|
125
|
|
29th (9.7.1974)
|
105 + 4
|
17 + 1
(Dr Jim Cairns, Lalor, Vic, ALP, Dr Moss Cass, Maribyrnong, Vic, ALP, Joan Child, Henty, Vic, ALP, Gareth Clayton, Isaacs, Vic, ALP, John Coates, Denison, Tas, ALP, John Dawkins, Tangney, WA, ALP, Kep Enderby, Canberra, ACT, ALP, Dr Douglas Everingham, Capricornia, Qld, ALP, Ken Fry, Fraser, ACT, ALP, Dr Richard Gun, Kingston, SA, ALP, Dr Dick Klugman, Prospect, NSW, ALP, Tony Lamb, La Trobe, Vic, ALP, Race Mathews, Casey, Vic, ALP, Tom Uren, Reid, NSW, ALP, Ralph Willis, Gellibrand, Vic, ALP, Mick Young, Port Adelaide, SA, ALP and Laurie Wallis, Grey, SA, ALP.) [119]
+1:
Ian Macphee, Balaclava, Vic, Lib[120]
|
127
|
14
|
127
|
|
30th (17.2.76)
|
113
|
14
|
127
|
11
|
127
|
|
31st (21.2.78)
|
106 +2
|
15 +1
|
124
|
13
|
124
|
|
32nd (25.11.80)
|
103
|
22
|
125
|
18
|
125
|
|
33rd (21.4.83)
|
92 +2
|
29 +1
|
124[121]
|
24
|
125
|
|
34th (21.2.85)
|
116 +1
|
31
|
148
|
21
|
148
|
|
35th (14.9.87)
|
109 +5
|
31 +3
|
148
|
23
|
148
|
|
36th (8.5.90)
|
119
|
29
|
148
|
20
|
148
|
|
37th (4.5.93)
|
107 +4
|
36
|
147
|
24
|
147
|
|
38th (30.4.96)
|
120
|
27
|
147[122]
|
18
|
148
|
|
39th (10.11.98)
|
113 +1
|
33
|
147[123]
|
22
|
148
|
|
40th (12.2.02)
|
115 +2
|
33
|
150
|
22
|
150
|
|
41st ( 16.11.04)
|
116 +3
|
30 +1
|
150
|
21
|
150
|
|
42nd (12.2.08)
|
106
|
44
|
150
|
29
|
150
|
|
43rd (28.9.10)
|
112
|
38
|
150
|
25
|
150
|
[2]. E Campbell, ‘Oaths and affirmations of public office’, Monash University Law Review, Vol 25, No. 1, 1999, p. 145 and footnote 38.
[4]. M Maddox, For God and country; religious dynamics in Australian federal politics, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2001, p. 116, viewed 8 March 2013, http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22library%2Fprspub%2F1534047%22. See also A Walker and E Wood, ‘The Parliamentary oath’, Research Paper, 00/17, House of Commons Library, February 2000, pp. 21–24, viewed 9 April 2013, http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/RP00-17
[5]. Ibid., Maddox, p. 115.
[6]. Campbell op. cit., p. 145.
[7]. G Souter, Acts of parliament, Commonwealth Parliament Bicentenary Publication, Melbourne University Press, 1988, p. 182. See also Souter pp. 182–184 and E Campbell, op. cit., p. 156.
[9]. F Anstey, ‘Privilege. Speech of Mr Mahon: motion for expulsion’, House of Representatives, Debates, 11 November 1920, p. 6470.
[10]. Ibid., pp. 6470–71.
[11]. W Hughes, ‘Privilege. Speech of Mr Mahon: motion for expulsion’, op. cit., pp. 6382–4. Hughes read the letter to the House of Representatives.
[13]. Maddox, op. cit., p. 115.
[15]. M Tate, ‘Immigration and ethnic affairs policies – ministerial statement’, Senate, Debates, 3 November 1983, p. 2200, viewed 3 April 2013, http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22chamber%2Fhansards%2F1983-11-03%2F0095%22. For changes to the Oath of Citizenship see D McKeown, Changes in the Australian oath of citizenship, Research note, no. 20, 2002-03, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Canberra, 2002, viewed 22 May 2013, http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22library%2Fprspub%2F1VW76%22
[18]. Quoted in Maddox, op. cit., p. 117. The interview with Sullivan was conducted in Parliament House on 28 June 1999.
[19]. Obituary, The Register, 23 November 1926, p. 13, viewed 8 April 2013, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/54823491. See also B Wimbourne, ‘Senior, Wiliam (1850-1926)’, The Biographical Dictionary of the Australian Senate, Vol. 1, 1901–1929, Melbourne University Press, Melbourne, 2000, p. 191.
[23]. The sources used to compile this information are Senate Debates, Senate Journals, House of Representative Debates and House of Representatives Votes and Proceedings. Where names have been recorded in these publications they are included in the tables in Appendix 1. The Senate Test Roll, signed by senators on the day on which they make an oath or affirmation, has been used to verify the number of senators swearing the oath and making an affirmation. Graphs prepared by the Parliamentary Library based on data in Appendix 1.
[24]. Parliamentary Library estimates.
[26]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 34, 18th Commonwealth Ministry, 2nd Lyons Ministry, 7 November 1938 to 7 April 1939.
[27]. National Archives of Australia, A463, 1972/4345, Swearing in of 2nd Whitlam Ministry, 19 December 1972.
[32]. Letters Patent relating to the Office of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, 21 August 2008, in Gazette S179 (9 September 2008). These revoked and replaced, with minor amendment and in gender-neutral language, the Letters Patent of 21 August 1984, in Gazette S334 (24.8.1984).
[34]. National Archives of Australia, A6661, 146, Governor-General, Oaths of Office, pp. 40-43. Following the death of Queen Victoria, Hopetoun was re-sworn on 6 April 1901, swearing allegiance to King Edward VII.
[35]. Ibid., see pp. 25–28.
[36]. Commonwealth of Australia, Gazette S181, 10 September 2008.
[38]. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Part IV, section 42, viewed 12 March 2013, http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Series/C2004Q00685. In the UK, the current wording of the oath was established under the provisions of the Promissory Oaths Act 1868 (UK) and in the House of Commons, the requirement to take the oath or affirmation is also enshrined in the Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament. See Walker, ‘The parliamentary oath’, op. cit., pp. 9–12.
[41]. Odgers’ Australian Senate Practice, Department of the Senate, 13th edition, p. 167, viewed 14 March 2013, http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Senate/Powers_practice_n_procedures/odgers13. Senators commence their term on 1 July even though the Senate may not sit until some weeks later when senators are formally sworn in. However, senators-elect may be appointed to Senate committees as full or participating members before their terms commence, but may only participate in committee inquiries from 1 July.
[44]. Quoted in House of Representatives Practice, Ibid., the Attorney-General’s Department advice is dated 16 February 1962.
[51]. Quoted in Campbell, op. cit., p. 154 and footnote 72.
[53]. Walker, ‘The parliamentary oath’, op. cit., p. 11.
[55]. Ibid., para 3.51, p. 52.
[56]. Ibid. para 3.53, p. 35.
[59]. National Archives of Australia, A463, 1971/5209, Third Gorton Ministry 12 November 1969 – 10 March 1971 appointment and swearing in.
[60]. D Smith, ‘On my oath: Sir David Smith’, The Australian National Review, June 1996, p. 27.
[61]. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC), Annual report 1984-85, DPMC, Canberra, 1985, pp. 31–32.
[62]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 1, First Commonwealth Ministry, 1 January 1901 to 24 September 1903, Ministerial oaths. This was still the form of the official oath sworn by ministers in the second Chifley ministry on 1 November 1946, National Archives of Australia, A5447, 44, 28th Commonwealth Ministry, 2nd Chifley Ministry 1946–1949, Ministerial oaths and correspondence,
[63]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 44, Ibid., includes historical note on the first administration 1901–03, p. 3, ‘Upon the death of Victoria and the accession of Edward VII all Ministers re-subscribed all three oaths’.
[64]. ‘Menzies cabinet takes over from Chifley Govt.’, The Canberra Times, 20 December 1949, viewed 20 May 2013, http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/2758203 The three oaths were: the oath of allegiance, the oath of office and the Executive Councillor’s oath.
[65]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 4, 2nd Commonwealth Ministry, Deakin Ministry, 24 September 1903 to 27 April 1904 (Correspondence and historical note).
[66]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 9 Part 2, 5th Commonwealth Ministry, Deakin Ministry, 5 July 1905 to 13 November 1908 (Correspondence and historical note)
[67]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 11, 6th Commonwealth Ministry, Fisher Ministry, 13 November 1908 to 1 June 1909 (Correspondence and historical note).
[73]. Constitution, section 62.
[75]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 1, op. cit.
[76]. The Governor-General determined the form of the oath and affirmation under Regulation 4 of Statutory Rules 1940, No. 235.
[78]. National Archives of Australia, A5447, 44, op. cit., p. 64.
[83]. M Fraser, ‘Answer to Question on notice: oaths and affirmations: Federal Executive Council and Privy Council’, op. cit.
[84]. M Beckett, ‘Written answers to questions: Privy Counsellors’, United Kingdom, House of Commons, Debates, 28 July 1998, col. 182, viewed 1 May 2013, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199798/cmhansrd/vo980728/text/80728w22.htm#80728w22.html_sbhd8. See also See Walker and Wood, ‘The parliamentary oath’, op. cit., p.49, and, ‘Privy Council of the United Kingdom’.
[85]. Senate Test Rolls viewed with the kind permission of the Clerk of the Senate, Dr Rosemary Laing. Note: there is no Senate Test Roll for the period 1901–3. Note: senators are required to sign the Senators’ Roll on the day on which they make the oath or affirmation of allegiance, see Odgers, op. cit., p. 183.
[86]. Australia, Senate, Journals, vol. 1, 1901–02, p. 3.
[87]. Ibid., vol. 1, 1907, p. 3.
[88]. Ibid., vol. 1, 1913, p. 3.
[89]. Ibid., vol. 1, 1914–15–16–17, p. 4.
[90]. Ibid., vol. 1, 1917–18–19, p. 2.
[94]. Senate, Journals, vol 1, 1937–40, p. 82, includes one senator elected at the 1937 election but not sworn in on 1 July 1938.
[95]. Collings, Senate, Debates, op. cit.
[96]. Territory senators serve for the same term as that of members of the House of Representatives. They are included in these statistics only when both Houses of Parliament are dissolved and a double dissolution election is held.
[97]. Figures for Parliaments 30–43 provided by the House of Representatives Chamber Research Office. Note: the figures do not include oaths and affirmations that may have been made by a member elected following a by-election during the Parliamentary term.
[102]. Charles Howroyd died on 10 May 1917. On 6 June 1917, a writ was issued for an election to fill the vacancy, ibid.
[106]. William McWilliams died on 22 October 1929 without taking his seat, ibid., p. 7.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Entry Point for referral.