Bills Digest no. 7 1976
Federal Court of Australia Bill, 1976
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Summary
Implications
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Federal Court of Australia Bill,
1976
Date introduced: 21 October
1976
House: House of Representatives
Short Digest of Bill
The purpose of the Bill:
To establish a new federal Court,
to be known as the Federal Court of Australia.
Summary:
The Bill would create the Federal
Court of Australia (cl. 5 (1) (hereinafter referred to as the
Court) to be a superior court of record and a court of law and
equity (cl. 5 (2)) and to consist of a Chief Judge and other judges
as are appointed (cl. 5 (3)). The Court will sit in two Divisions,
the Industrial Division and the General Division. All the
jurisdiction of the Court will be exercised in the General Division
except that which is required by any Act to be exercised in the
Industrial Division. The Court may be constituted in either
Division by a single Judge or as a Full Court. (cl. 13 and 14). The powers of the Court will extend
throughout Australia and the Territories (including every external
Territory). (cl. 18 and 3). The Court
will be an itinerant Court, go on circuit and sit as required in
each State and Territory. (ss. 12 and
34).
The Court is intended, to have (1)
original and (2) appellate and related jurisdiction. It is not
intended that indictable offences will be prosecuted in the
Court.
The original jurisdiction of the
Court is not specified but the Court will have the present original
jurisdiction of the Australian Industrial Court and the Federal
Court of Bankruptcy. The original jurisdiction will be exercised by
a Full Court in the Industrial Division and by a single Judge in
the General Division. It is intended that the Court may make
binding declarations of right in any matter in which it has
original jurisdiction. (Part III Division 1).
In the appellate jurisdiction the
Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals (a) from a single Judge of
the Court; (b) from judgments of the Supreme Court of a Territory;
and (c) in such cases as are provided by any other Act, from
judgments of a State court, other than a Full Court of the Supreme
Court of a State, exercising federal jurisdiction. Under the
Constitution the Court will also have jurisdiction in matters
associated with matters of federal jurisdiction before the Court.
These associated matters if they arose in isolation might not be
matters of federal jurisdiction but require to be disposed of at
the sane time as a matter before the Court so that the rights of
the parties may be finally determined.
It is intended that an appeal shall
not lie after the commencing day from a judgment of the Supreme
Court of a Territory except by leave or special leave of the High
Court or the Supreme Court before the commencing day. State and
Territory courts from which an appeal lies to the Court may state a
case or reserve a question of law to the Court alone. (cl. 26). The appellate jurisdiction of the Court
will be exercised by a Full Court except where otherwise expressly
provided in any Act. (Part III, Division 2). It is intended that an
appeal shall lie from the Full Court of the new Court to the High
Court only by special leave of the High Court. (Part IV).
Implications:
The High Court will be relieved of
some of its work-load in federal and Territory law matters and have
more time to concentrate on constitutional matters and its role as
the final appellate court in Australia.
The Bill does not affect the
functions of the Family Court of Australia nor the original
jurisdiction exercised by State courts. The provisions which enable
judges of the Territory Supreme Courts to sit in the Court on
appeals from their own courts will benefit the appellate work of
the Court in Territory matters. The provisions concerning the
Industrial Division of the Court mean that the special character of
the industrial jurisdiction under the Conciliation and Arbitration
Act will be preserved.
The Court is to have jurisdiction
only with respect to those matters specified by Parliament. The
effect of the restrictive appellate provisions from the Court to
the High Court is that the Court will be the authority in the
specific matters within its jurisdiction. The result should be
uniformity of interpretation of the law in these matters.
Complementary legislation will be
introduced to establish a comprehensive appellate structure for the
Territories.
K.I. Inglis
29 October 1976
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the
Australian Parliament using information available at the time of
production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position
of the Information and Research Service, nor do they constitute
professional legal opinion.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2006
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2006.
Back to top