Bills Digest no. 26 2007–08
Migration Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations) Bill
2007
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage history
Purpose
Background
Financial implications
Main provisions
Endnotes
Contact officer & copyright details
Passage history
-
to introduce a sponsorship obligations regime
for approved sponsors of employees temporarily in Australia under a
subclass 457 Business (Long Stay) visa;
-
to introduce civil penalties that will apply to
approved sponsors who breach sponsorship obligations;
-
to introduce provisions that impose and recover
penalties under Subdivision BB of Division 3A of Part 2
(sponsorship obligations);
-
to introduce provisions that appoint inspectors
and define their powers and functions;
-
to insert general provisions relating to civil
remedies.
To amend the Taxation Administration Act
1953 to provide for the disclosure of information by the
Commissioner to the Department of Immigration and Citizenship
relating to sponsorship of overseas employees.
This Bill creates
provisions for sponsorship obligations that employers need to abide
by when sponsoring persons for employment in Australia on a
temporary basis. If these obligations are breached, civil penalties
will apply. Currently employers make a series of undertakings once
their nomination as a sponsor is approved. The history of the
current provisions can be found in the recommendations of an
inquiry conducted in 1995.
In 1995 the Committee of Inquiry into the
Temporary Entry of Business People and Highly Skilled Specialists
investigated the then regime for temporary entry to Australia. The
report found that the objective was to achieve an Australian
workforce self-sufficient in all skills and that the temporary
entry system reflected this objective.
The focus was on ensuring that there could be no
entry which was not in accord with this objective. Consequently,
current policies and procedures are prescriptive, complex and slow
to administer.
[1]
It considered that if Australian business is
to compete effectively in domestic and international markets,
become integrated into the world economy, have speedy access to
international best practice and be able to develop overseas
contacts and networks, the primary principle governing the
temporary entry of key business personnel needs to be that it is of
benefit to Australia. [2]
The Committee recommended that a new business
temporary entry regime that simplified and streamlined procedures
be introduced to enable employers of good standing to bring in key
business personnel quickly and smoothly. The procedures were
designed to simplify the then, often cumbersome process of
obtaining new visas for extensions of stay. [3] The new arrangements contained
procedural simplicity, fast track processing and a monitoring
system to ensure that employers complied with their undertakings.
The key recommendations were accepted by the Keating Government.
For further background information and analysis on the 457 visa
generally as well as statistical information see Janet Phillips,
Temporary
(Long Stay) Business Visas: subclass 457, Research Note No.15,
21 February 2007.
The Temporary Business (Long Stay)(Subclass
457 visa (457 visa)) was introduced by the Howard Government in
1996 by the Migration Regulations (Amendment) No 76. The
purpose of the new amendments was to introduce a new visa to enable
persons to be eligible for a temporary visa that would permit them
to enter and remain in Australia for a period of more than three
months but less than four years and to enable them to leave and
enter Australia on multiple occasions until the end of that period.
[4] The purpose
generally of the regulations was to rationalise arrangements for
the temporary entry of business people and highly qualified
specialists, to simplify procedures, and to introduce a degree of
self-regulation for certain employers of holders of Subclass 457
visas. [5]
Employers currently seeking to employ overseas
persons to work in Australia on a temporary basis currently have to
make certain undertakings in relation to those employees. The
Department of Immigration and Citizenship sets out the obligations
of sponsors on their website:
http://www.immi.gov.au/skilled/skilled-workers/sbs/obligations.htm
Under existing regulations made under section
140H, sponsors are currently required to make a number of
prescribed undertakings. This Bill will replace some of these
undertakings by placing them in the Principal Act as well as
incorporating enforcement provisions. [6]
There have been many complaints of problems
with the 457 visa system. Unions want the rules tightened after it
was revealed that 20 overseas workers had died in the past five
years There have been allegations of employer abuse and
underpayment and the government has been at pains to tighten up the
scheme to preserve its integrity. [7]
There have been many reported cases in the
media of alleged situations where 457 visas have been abused by
employers. Examples have included underpayment of wages or no
payment for overtime, discrimination on the basis of union
membership, workplace safety and training requirements not being
met and 457 workers being used as strike breakers. [8]
During Estimates hearings, answers to
questions on notice have revealed that there are certain industries
at risk. Those industries where a number of breaches of sponsor
undertakings have occurred are in the following industry
sectors:
There have been allegations made against 10
companies in the meat industry since January 2006. [10]
Of the 300 subclass 457 visa sponsors under
investigation by Department of Immigration and Citizenship, 70 have
been referred to other agencies for their investigation as at 19
February 2007. Referrals are usually made once DIAC has sufficient
evidence to warrant this. [11]
According to Form 1196, sponsorship
undertakings are currently monitored. The Department requires
sponsors to provide monitoring information, including employment
records. The Department may also undertake site visits to ensure
compliance with undertakings. If a business sponsor fails to
provide information requested during monitoring, does not fulfil
sponsorship undertakings or provides incorrect information to the
Department, the Department may then bar the business from
sponsoring or nominating employees for a specified period of time,
cancel the business sponsorship agreement and/or cancel the visas
of employees the business has sponsored. [12]
A breach of an obligation under the Bill will
incur a civil penalty. The penalty for an individual is 60 penalty
units and for a body corporate it is 300 penalty units. For a
breach of an obligation contained in the regulations, the
regulations may prescribe a civil penalty not exceeding 50 penalty
units for an individual and 250 penalty units for a body corporate.
[13] Section 4AA of
the Crimes Act 1914 defines a penalty unit as $110.
Criminal penalties have not been used for the
reasons set out in the Explanatory Memorandum:
The justification for use of civil penalty
provisions, as opposed to criminal sanctions, is that the
imposition of criminal sanctions on sponsors could have harsh
consequences on the sponsor such as a loss of their export licence
(or any other licence for that matter), which would not be in
Australia s best interest. The use of civil provisions is also
considered appropriate for the enforcement scheme to be flexible
and administratively manageable. The use of civil penalties will
increase compliance with migration legislation (and other relevant
laws), thereby preserving the integrity of the Australian labour
market and improving the conditions of overseas workers. In
addition, the justification for no fault civil penalty offences is
to facilitate an infringements notices regime. A power has been
included to provide for such a regime in the
Migration
Regulations 1994. (See item 46 which inserts new paragraph
504(1)(jb).
[14]
In the second reading speech by the Minister
for Immigration and Citizenship, Mr Andrews states that the Bill
provides a power for regulations to be made to set up an
infringement notices regime. Item 46 in the bill
inserts a provision into section 504(1) of the Migration Act
1958. New Subsection 504(1)(jb) will enable
the making of regulations to enable a person to pay a prescribed
penalty as an alternative to a proceeding under section 140SB which
deals with the imposition and recovery of civil penalties under
Subdivision BB. This prescribed penalty would not exceed one-fifth
of the maximum penalty. For example if a person was in breach of an
obligation, instead of proceedings being instituted against that
person for the recovery of a penalty, they would be given the
option of paying a prescribed penalty that would not exceed
one-fifth of the maximum penalty. If the civil penalty if 50
penalty units, the infringement penalty would be 10 penalty units
or $1100.
A criminal offence is created by new
section 140ZK. A person commits an offence if they do one
of the following:
-
fails to produce a document within a specified
period that was required by an inspector under subparagraph
140ZJ(2)(b)(iii);
-
fails to produce a document at a specified
place and within a specified time not less than 7 days in response
to a written notice by an inspector under
paragraph 140ZJ(2)(c);
-
does not produce a document under
subparagraph 140ZJ(2)(b)(iii) and the inspector
then issues a written notice to the person under subsection
140ZJ(4) to produce a document at a specified place and
within a specified time not less than 7 days and the person fails
to respond to this request.
represents a justifiable measure to better
ensure the integrity of the 457 visa system. The obligations
contained in the Bill are generally aimed at reflecting, in
legislation, the existing undertakings that must be observed by
sponsors employing workers under the 457 visa scheme. The Bill
further aims to ensure these obligations are met without being
circumvented by employers undermining stipulated minimum salary
levels by passing on costs to employees. The Committee supports
both these objectives.
[15]
The Committee also noted that matters relating
to greater investigative powers of departmental officers and
stronger penalties were not in dispute during the inquiry. [16]
Submissions to the Committee canvassed a
number of concerns such as:
-
the Bill is a disproportionate and potentially
detrimental response to a limited problem;
[17]
-
medical costs would be a significant cost for
sponsors and that employees should pay their own costs;
[18]
-
visa holders should pay their own travel costs;
[19]
-
the requirement to pay migration agents costs
would unnecessarily inhibit employers from utilising the scheme;
[20]
-
retrospectivity of the operation of the Bill s
provisions to current visa holders and sponsors is a major concern;
[21]
more compliance time is needed to respond to
provide information on request and that 21 days would be a
reasonable time.
[22]
The Committee recognised that although it is
undesirable to have retrospective application of laws, in the case
of 457 visas and the length that current visas may run, that it was
impractical for the law not to apply to these visas as well.
[23]
The Committee has recommended:
-
that there should be a right to challenge
unreasonable and unspecified migration agents and recruitment
agents charges;
-
that a minimum of 14 days to provide
information replace the proposal in the Bill of not less than 7
days;
-
that DIAC establish guidelines relating to the
exercise of powers proposed in sections 140IK (obligation to
provide information) and 140ZJ (powers of inspectors) and that
notices under these sections clearly state the consequences of
non-compliance.
According to the additional comments attached
to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Committee report, the ALP
supports the recommendations of the Committee but add that in their
opinion the Bill does not prevent continued abuse of 457 visas to
undercut Australian wages and conditions. They consider that it is
being used as a cheap source of labour rather than to address a
skills shortage. Their position is that 457 visa holders should be
paid the going market rate of pay, while maintaining the Minimum
Salary Level (MSL) as a base salary for temporary work visa
holders. [24] The
effective market rate of pay for temporary skilled workers is based
on the principle of equal pay for equal work. [25]
On 6
December 2006 the Joint Standing Committee on Migration was given a
reference to inquire into Eligibility requirements and
monitoring, enforcement and reporting arrangements for temporary
business visas. The report of the inquiry into temporary
business visas will be made available soon once it is tabled. (if
any)
Concerns were raised
in submissions to the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and
Constitutional Affairs concerning the imposition of costs
associated with obligations on employers such as health costs,
travel costs, migration agents costs and costs associated with
non-departure. [26] In a submission to the Joint Committee on Migration a
union raised concerns about the exorbitant deductions being made
from the wages of temporary workers for accommodation, airfares and
recruitment costs. [27]
The Explanatory Memorandum states the changes
to the temporary skilled migration visa category are estimated to
be $85.3 million over the next four years from 2007-08. This amount
has been included in the 2007-08 Budget and forward year estimates.
$66.1 million has been allocated to the Department of Immigration
and Citizenship, $35.9 of which implements the sponsorship
obligations regime with the remainder to the Department of
Employment and Workplace Relations, Department of Education,
Science and Training and the Australian Taxation Office. Revenue
from fines is estimated at $7.9 million.
Part 1 Amendments
New Subdivision BA Sponsorship
undertakings may be required for approval as a sponsor
Item 6 new subsection 140H(3)
substitutes the existing provision and provides that undertakings
do not have effect until the applicant is an approved sponsor of
the person.
Item 7 New Subdivision BB Sponsorship
obligations of certain approved sponsors.
New section 140IB defines the
meaning of primary person as the person being sponsored for a
nominated activity, and the meaning of secondary person as a person
who has a relationship with the primary person.
Obligation to pay at least a Minimum
Salary Level
New subsection 140IC(1)
provides that the approved sponsor will pay a salary at or above
the level that is worked out in a way specified by the Minister
from time to time and pay the person who is not in Australia when
the visa is granted either on the day the person commences working
for the approved sponsor or 28 days after the person arrives in
Australia, whichever is the earlier date (new subsection
140IC(1)(b)(i)). If the person is already in Australia,
the day on which the person starts work or 28 days after the visa
is granted, whichever is the earlier. A civil penalty applies for a
breach of new subsection 140IC
(1).
New subsection 140IC(2)
provides that a legislative instrument may specify ways in which
the level of salary is worked out according to different
occupations, persons working in different geographical areas and
any other circumstances that the Minister considers appropriate.
Mechanisms may be included to vary the level on specified days or
at the end of specified periods. This would allow indexation of the
level of salary by a specified percentage on a particular day each
year without the need to re-make the legislative instrument.
[28] New
subsection 140IC(3) provides that the obligation on the
sponsor is satisfied if the sponsor has arranged with another
person to pay some or all of the person s salary, for example the
Explanatory Memorandum mentions workers compensation insurance for
the primary person. Any shortfall in the salary of the primary
person is to be met by the sponsor. Subsection (3) only applies if
the sponsor has paid the costs, such as a premium for example, of
the arrangement with the other person (new subsection
140IC(4)).
Obligation to employ primary person in
the same or a higher-skilled activity
New section 140ID provides
that there is an obligation to employ the primary person in the
same or a higher skilled activity as the nominated activity for
which the visa was granted in the first place. A civil penalty
applies for a breach of this obligation.
Obligation to pay travel costs of
leaving Australia
New section 140IE provides
that there is an obligation to pay the travel costs of the primary
and secondary person when leaving Australia to return home
permanently. New subsection 140IE(1) provides that
the sponsor pay the travel costs for the primary person to return
home. This includes travel within Australia as well for the purpose
of returning home. A civil penalty applies for any breach of this
obligation. The sponsor is also responsible for paying the travel
costs of the secondary person, including internal travel in
Australia for the purpose of returning home. A civil penalty
applies for a breach of this obligation (new subsection
140IE(2)). If there has been more than one approved
sponsor, subsections (1) and (2) only apply to the last approved
sponsor who is responsible for the travel costs of the primary and
secondary persons when they leave Australia permanently
(new subsection 140IE(3)). If another person,
(whether the primary or secondary person) pays some or all of the
travel costs, the approved sponsor s obligation is satisfied when
the approved sponsor fully reimburses the other person within 14
days of being given a receipt (new subsection
140IE(4)).
Obligation to pay certain medical
costs
New subsections 140IF(1) and
(2) provide that an approved sponsor must pay the
prescribed medical costs of the primary person and the secondary
person. A civil penalty applies for a breach of these obligations.
New subsection 140IF(3) provides that regulations
prescribing medical costs can specify particular medical costs or
classes of costs, a limit on the medical costs for a person and a
limit on particular medical costs or classes of costs. New
subsection 140IF(4) provides that if the primary or
secondary person pays the medical costs, the sponsor satisfies his
or her obligations if these costs are fully reimbursed by the
sponsor in 14 days. New subsection
140IF(5) makes similar provision in the event of costs
being paid by a third person. Subsection (5) only applies if the
approved sponsor has paid the costs of the arrangement (new
subsection 140IF(6)).
Obligation to pay certain other fees
and costs
New subsection 140IG(1)
provides that the approved sponsor of the person must pay any
licence, registration, membership or other fees required under any
Commonwealth, State or Territory law for the person to work in that
nominated activity; the costs of recruiting the person, and any
migration agent fees relating to the person s visa application. A
civil penalty applies for a breach of this obligation. The approved
sponsor of the secondary person must pay the migration agent s fees
associated with the visa application. A civil penalty applies for a
breach of this obligation (new subsection
140IG(2)). If the another person pays some or all of the
fees and costs, the approved sponsor s obligation is satisfied in
relation (1) and (2) if the approved sponsor reimburses the person
within 14 days (new subsection 140IG(3)).
Obligation to keep
records
New section 140IH provides
that the approved sponsor must keep prescribed records of all
payments made under this Subdivision or regulations and any other
records that are prescribed by regulations. A civil penalty applies
for a breach of this obligation.
Obligation to pay costs of locating,
detaining and removing etc. sponsored person
New subsection 140IJ(1)
provides that an approved sponsor must pay to the Commonwealth any
costs associated with locating and detaining a person, including a
secondary person, removal or deportation costs including airfares
and processing a protection visa application. New
subsection 140IJ(2) provides that costs relating
to locating a person or processing a person for a protection visa
will be determined in writing by the Minister and the costs of
detaining, removing, or deporting a person has the same meaning as
in Division 10 which deals with the costs of detention, removal and
deportation. However, regulations may prescribe a limit on those
costs (new subsection 140IJ(2)). Currently there
is a limit of $10000 on costs related to location and detention.
[29] New
subsection 140IJ(3) provides that if there are other
persons as well as the approved sponsor who are responsible for the
costs under Division 10, they will be jointly and severally liable
for the costs. New subsection 140IJ(4) provides
that nothing in Division 10 will override the liability of the
approved sponsor in this section.
Obligation to provide
information
New subsection 140IK(1)
allows the Secretary to require the sponsor to furnish information
specified by notice. The information must be for the purposes of
the Act or the regulations. New subsection
140IK(5) provides that failure to comply with the notice
results in a civil penalty. New subsection
140IK(6) provides that an approved sponsor does not have
to comply with a notice once it is withdrawn in writing by the
Secretary.
Item 10, new subsection
140K(1A) provides that the Minister may take action under
section 140L if an approved sponsor or former approved sponsor with
an existing obligation, breaches an obligation.
New subsection 140K(1B) provides
that a Minister may take action under subsection 140L(c) to (g) if
an approved sponsor, or former sponsor contravenes a Commonwealth,
State or Territory law. Subsections 140L(c) to (g) deal with
barring a sponsor.
Subdivision BE Liability, enforcement and
recovery
Item 16 new section 140QA
defines eligible court and Subdivision BB civil penalty provision .
Item 22 new section 140SA
provides that the Minister may apply for an order from an eligible
court relating to a breach of an obligation with a civil penalty
attached.
New section 140SB relates to
the imposition and recovery of civil penalties under Subdivision
BB. New subsection 140SB(1) provides that a court
can make an order to impose a pecuniary penalty on a person if that
person is in breach of an obligation. A person involved in the
breach, such as a person who aids or abets a breach will be treated
as having breached the obligation and be subject to the civil
penalty (new subsection 140SB(9)).
New subsection 140SB(3)
provides that if a person commits two or more breaches arising out
of a course of conduct, the number of breaches will be taken to be
a single breach of the provision. New subsection
140SB(4) provides that the two or more breaches arising
out of a course of conduct have to relate to an obligation to the
same person. If another person is owed an obligation and both
obligations are breached, then it will constitute two separate
breaches. New subsection 140SB(5) provides that
(3) does not apply, if a court has already imposed a penalty for an
earlier breach of the provision. If during proceedings under
section 140SB, it becomes apparent to a Court that there are unpaid
amounts owing to the Commonwealth, State, Territory or another
person, the Court may order that these amounts be paid (new
subsection 140SB(6)). A note refers to sections 140R
(Joint and several liability for debts) [30] and 140S (Liability to pay other
amounts) in the Migration Act 1958 which allow recovery in a court
of amounts owed in relation to an undertaking or an obligation.
However new subsection 140SB(7) provides that a
court cannot make an order under subsection (6) if the underpayment
was more than 6 years before the court proceedings. Proceedings for
a breach of an obligation must not commence if it is more than 6
years since the breach occurred (new subsection
140SB(8)).
New section 140SC provides
that a court when exercising powers under section 140SB(6) must
order that interest on the whole or part of the sum, be included in
the sum for all or part of the period between the time the action
is commenced and the date when the order is made or judgment is
entered. Alternatively the Court instead of ordering interest order
that a lump sum be included instead of interest. Situations where
this does not apply are set out in new subsection
140SC(2).
Section 140V deals with disclosure of personal
information in prescribed circumstances. Provisions exist in the
section about disclosure of information to an approved sponsor or
former approved sponsor. Item 25 new
subsection 140V(1A) provides that the Minister may
disclose prescribed personal information about an approved sponsor
or former approved sponsor to a visa holder or former visa holder
of that sponsor. New subsection 140V(1B) provides
that a Minister may disclose prescribed personal information to a
prescribed agency of the Commonwealth, State or Territory about a
visa holder or former visa holder or an approved sponsor or former
sponsor. Item 26 new subsection
140V(3) is substituted and provides that regulations may
prescribe the circumstances in which personal information can be
disclosed or used under (1), (1A) or (1B). Item 27
new subsection 140V(4) provides that the Minister
must notify the visa holder or former visa holder or the sponsor or
former sponsor of the disclosure and details of the information
disclosed.
Section 140X is substituted
and provides that this Division and regulations made under it apply
to a partnership as if it were a person.
Item 35 new
subsection 140ZBA(1) provides that an offence that is
otherwise committed by the partnership is taken to have been
committed by each partner, who committed the act or made the
omission or aided and abetted the act or omission. New
subsection 140ZBA(2) provides that a pecuniary penalty
must not be imposed on a partner bound by a civil penalty provision
in relation to a breach of an obligation unless the partner
committed the act or made the omission or aided and abetted the
conduct. For the purposes of subsections (1) and (2) if the conduct
by a partner was in the ordinary course of business and within
authority then this will suffice to establish the partnership
engaged in conduct. New subsection 140ZBA(4)
provides that in relation to (1), to establish that a partnership
had a particular state of mind when engaging in certain conduct, it
is enough to demonstrate that the partner had that particular state
of mind.
New section 140ZC substitutes
the existing section and relates to unincorporated associations.
Item 36 new section 140ZC provides that this
Division and regulations made under it apply to an unincorporated
association as if it were a person.
Item 37 new subsection
140ZD(1) substitutes the existing section and provides
that subject to section 140ZF (former members of committees of
management), a sponsorship obligation that would otherwise be
imposed on an unincorporated association, is imposed on each of the
members of the association s committee of management when the
association becomes the approved sponsor. The section is subject to
the operation of section 140ZF where regulations will prescribe the
circumstances of how long a sponsorship obligation will remain
enforceable against former members of the committee as well as a
sponsorship right and debts that remain payable.
Item 42 new section 140ZGA
makes similar provision to that of section 140ZBA in relation to
offences by unincorporated associations.
Item 44 new Subdivision D Inspectors.
New section 140ZH includes provisions concerning
inspectors. New subsection 140ZH(1) provides that
the Minister may appoint inspectors as he considers necessary by
written instrument. New subsection 140ZH(5)
provides that the Act or regulations will confer the powers and
functions of an inspector. New subsection 140ZI(1)
provides that the Minister may issue an identity card to an
inspector. The inspector must carry the card at all times when
exercising the powers and functions of an inspector (new
subsection 140ZI(2)).
New subsection 140ZJ(1)
provides that the purpose of inspectors is to determine whether
obligations are being or have been complied with under the Act and
regulations. New subsection
140ZJ(2) provides inspectors with the power
-
to enter a place of business without force if
the inspector believes there may be information, documents or other
relevant material relating to whether obligations are being
complied with;
-
inspect any work, material, machinery,
appliance, article or facility;
-
interview any person and require documents to
be produced within a specified period;
-
make copies or extracts of the document,
require a person to tell the inspector who has a document and can
require a person by written notice to produce a document to him at
a specified place within a specified period not less than 7
days.
New subsection 140ZJ(8)
provides that a person is still required to produce information or
documents even though it may tend to incriminate the person.
New subsection 140ZJ(9) provides that producing
the information or document, or the direct or indirect consequences
of doing that is not admissible as evidence in any criminal
proceedings other than for an offence against section 140ZK.
New section 140ZK creates an
offence for a person who fails to comply with some requirements
under section 140JC (see page 9 of this Digest).
Item 45 Part 8D General provisions
relating to civil remedies
New section 486R describes
the rules that will apply and how the Part will operate for the
purpose of section 140SB (imposition and recovery of civil
penalties under Subdivision BB) and any other provisions of the Act
or regulations that are declared to be civil remedy provisions.
Item 46 new
subparagraph 504(1)(jb) will enable regulations to be made
under Subdivision BB to allow a person to pay a prescribed penalty
to the Commonwealth rather than a proceeding under section 140SB.
The penalty will not exceed one fifth of the maximum penalty that
would normally apply. An infringement notice will be issued
pursuant to the regulations made under section 504(1)(jb) in
relation to less serious or technical breaches of the obligations.
An example might be failing to respond to a requirement to return a
monitoring form. [31]
Schedule 2
Taxation Administration Act 1953
Part 1 Amendment
New subsection 3ED(1)
overrides secrecy provisions to allow the Commissioner for Taxation
to disclose tax information to DIAC in certain circumstances. Under
new subsection 3ED(2) a person who receives
information under subsections (1) or (3), must not disclose that
information. A penalty of two years imprisonment applies.
New subsection 3ED(3) provides that subsection (2)
does not apply if the information was disclosed or a record made in
connection with exceptions listed; such as the exercise of the
Minister s powers under Division 3A or the regulations, a review
under the Migration Act or judicial review of a decision concerning
the exercise of those powers, proceedings under Subdivision BE
(Liability, enforcement and recovery provisions), a penalty is paid
by a person in accordance with paragraph 504(1)(jb) of the Act, or
any other proceedings arising as a result of (c) or (d) in new
section 3ED.
Endnotes
[1]. Business Temporary Entry: Future Directions, Report
by the Committee of Inquiry into the Temporary Entry of Business
People and Highly Skilled Specialists, Canberra, 1995, p.
1.
[6]. See R 1.20CB
Sponsorship Undertakings in the Migration Regulations 1994.
[8]. John Della
Bosca, NSW Minister for Industrial Relations, Submission to the
Joint Committee on Migration Inquiry into Temporary Business
Visas, 2007.
[10]. Senator Kim Carr, Answer to a Question on Notice,
Supplementary Budget Estimates, 30 October 2006.
[11]. Senator Trish Crossin, Answer to a Question on Notice,
Additional Estimates Hearing, 12 February 2007.
[12]. Department of Immigration and Citizenship, Sponsoring
temporary overseas employees to Australia, Form 1196, p. 2.
[13]. Section 140IL
Other obligations as prescribed, Migration Amendment (Sponsorship
Obligations) Bill 2007, p. 11
[14]. Migration
Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations) Bill 2007, Explanatory
Memorandum, p. 8.
[15]. Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional
Affairs, Migration Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations)
Bill 2007 [Provisions], Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Canberra, 2007, p.
13.
[17]. Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and constitutional Affairs, Migration
Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations) Bill
2007 [Provisions], Senate Standing Committee on
Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Canberra, 2007, p. 7.
[24]. Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional
Affairs, Migration Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations)
Bill 2007 [Provisions], Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Canberra, 2007,
additional comments by the Australian Labor Party, p. 17.
[27]. CFMEU
Submission to the Joint Committee on Migration, Inquiry into
Eligibility Requirements and monitoring, enforcement and reporting
arrangements for temporary business visas, 2 February 2007, p.
4
[28]. Senate Standing Committee on Legal and constitutional
Affairs, Migration Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations)
Bill 2007 [Provisions], Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Canberra, 2007,
answer to a question on notice to the Department of Immigration and
Citizenship, p. 1.
[29]. Migration Regulations 1994, r.1.20CC
[30]. Joint and
several liability is an obligation or liability of two or more
persons, so that all are liable jointly or each is liable
separately. The party to whom the liability or obligation is owed
may either sue one or more separately or all jointly. This means
that a plaintiff is entitled to full compensation from any one of
the defendants, Butterworths Australian Legal Dictionary, 1997, p.
643
[31]. Senate Standing Committee on Legal and constitutional
Affairs, Migration Amendment (Sponsorship Obligations)
Bill 2007 [Provisions], Senate Standing
Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Canberra, 2007,
answer to a question on notice to the Department of Immigration and
Citizenship, p. 5.
Moira Coombs
14 August 2007
Law and Bills Section
Parliamentary Library
© Commonwealth of Australia
This work is copyright. Except to the extent of uses permitted
by the Copyright Act 1968, no person may reproduce or transmit any
part of this work by any process without the prior written consent
of the Parliamentary Librarian. This requirement does not apply to
members of the Parliament of Australia acting in the course of
their official duties.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian
Parliament using information available at the time of production.
The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the
Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal
opinion.
Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: web.library@aph.gov.au. Any
concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary
Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the
contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff.
To access this service, clients may contact the author or the
Library’s Central Entry Point for referral.
Back to top