Bills Digest no. 42 2006–07
Parliamentary Superannuation Amendment Bill
2006
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Financial implications
Main Provisions
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Parliamentary Superannuation
Amendment Bill 2006
Date introduced: 11 October 2006
House: House of
Representatives
Portfolio: Finance and Administration
Commencement: Royal Assent
This Bill amends the
Parliamentary Superannuation Act 2004 (PSA).
Essentially, the Bill increases the government s contribution to
a member or senator s superannuation account from 9 to 15.4 per
cent of the sum of:
- the amount of
parliamentary allowance to which the person is entitled in
respect of the
month
- the amount (if any) of
salary to which the member is entitled because he or she was a
Minister of State for some or all of the
month; and
- the amount (if any) of allowance by way of
salary to which the member is entitled because he or she was an
office holder for some or all of the
month.(1)
Currently, there are two parliamentary superannuation schemes in
operation for members and senators. The first is the Parliamentary
Contributory Superannuation Scheme (PCSS), which commenced
operation in 1948 and was closed to new members in 2004. Further
background on the closure of the PCSS and the commencement of the
new scheme can be read in the Parliamentary Library s Bills Digest
on the Parliamentary Superannuation Bill 2004.(2)
The second is constituted by the arrangements made under the
PSA. These arrangements commenced operation from 1 April 2004 and
only apply to members first entering, or re-entering, Parliament as
a result of the 2004 election. Currently, these arrangements
are:
- 9 per cent of a member s or senator s parliamentary income per
year is paid into a superannuation fund of their choice, and
- if the member or senator does not choose a particular fund the
payments are made into the Australian Government Employees
Superannuation Trust (AGEST).
The figure of nine per cent of income is based on the minimum
required employer contributions under the current Superannuation
Guarantee Provisions.(3)
This rate of contribution is widely interpreted as being the
community standard for employer superannuation contributions on
behalf of the employee. However, research undertaken by Treasury s
Retirement Income Modelling Unit in 2003 indicated that the average
rate at which employer superannuation contributions are made for
higher income earners was between 10 and 12 per cent.(4)
Anecdotal evidence suggest that even higher rates of contribution
are common.(5)
Public Servant s Superannuation Arrangements
There are three schemes providing superannuation benefits to
Commonwealth public servants:
- the Commonwealth Superannuation Scheme (CSS), which was closed
to new members in 1990
- the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme (PSS), which was closed
to new members on 30 June 2005, and
- the Public Sector Superannuation Scheme Accumulation Plan
(PSSAP), which commenced operation on 1 July 2005.
The Commonwealth s notional contribution rate to the PSS, as at
30 June 2005, expressed as a percentage of a Commonwealth public
servant s superannuation salary, was 15.6 per cent. As at 30 June
2002 it was 15.4 per cent.(6)
The Commonwealth contributes at least 15.4 per
cent of a PSSAP member s salary to the scheme.(7)
Comparison with the PCSS
If the proposed arrangements are approved by Parliament, the
resulting superannuation benefits would still be far less generous
than the PCSS scheme. For example, one commentator has noted that
the Commonwealth s notional contribution to the PCSS is about 70
per cent of a parliamentarian s income.(8) As noted
above, the proposed contribution rate is 15.4 per cent of the same
income.
The measure was announced in a Press release by the Rt. Hon.
John Howard MP on 7 September 2006.(9)
Press reaction to the increase in the rate at which the
Commonwealth contributes to post 2004 election members and senators
superannuation has been varied:
- some commentators condemn this development as an unwarranted
pay increase(10)
- some commentators suggest that the attractions of office and
current parliamentary remuneration standards are sufficient to
attract talented individuals to become members and senators. This
point casts doubt on one of the main justifications given (see
below) for increasing the superannuation contributions rate for the
relevant parliamentarians,(11) and
- one commentator supported the increase in the contributions
rate on the basis of comparative wages levels with senior
executives in the private sector.(12)
Points in favour of increasing the superannuation contribution
rate for the relevant members and senators are:
- it places these parliamentarians on the same basis as their
staff and the public servants with whom they deal
- higher overall levels of parliamentary remuneration attract
more diverse, talented and qualified individuals to parliament
- higher remuneration for parliamentarians allows them to work
without the distraction of securing an income and prevents conflict
of interest situations arising from involvement from extra
parliamentary employment
- the increase in superannuation contribution rates may actually
align this aspect of a parliamentarians remuneration with current
community practice as applied to other higher income earners,
and
- in view of high, private sector, executive wage levels,
increases in the total remuneration for parliamentarians via
increasing the contribution rate is fair.
Arguments against the increase in the
superannuation contribution rate include:
- the increase is unnecessary, as sufficient numbers of suitably
qualified individuals seeking entry to parliament are always
available
- as the basic allowance for members and senators is already well
above the average wage (i.e. currently $118 950 p.a.), increasing
the superannuation contribution rate unjustifiably increases their
total remuneration, and
the desire to undertake public service, not the prospect of
higher pay and retirement benefits, should attract individuals to
parliament. Increasing parliamentary remuneration may attract new
parliamentarians mostly for the remuneration available, not to
render a valuable and often thankless form of public service
The ALP has indicated hat it will support the increase in the
superannuation contribution rate for the relevant
parliamentarians.(13)
The Leader of the Greens in the Senate, Senator Bob Brown, has
noted that the increase in the contribution rate is designed to win
the support of the back bench and is in stark contradiction to the
earlier decision to set the Commonwealth s superannuation
contributions at 9 per cent of the relevant parliamentarian s
salary.(14)
Prominent independent member, Mr Peter Andren MP, has noted that
there is a strong argument for increasing the rate at which the
Commonwealth makes superannuation contributions on behalf of the
relevant parliamentarians. However, he has called for:
- increasing the general employer superannuation contribution
rate to 15 per cent of wages, and
- an inquiry into parliamentarians
remuneration.(15)
The fiscal impact is projected to be less than a million dollars
in each of the financial years to 2010 11.(16)
Clause 1 of the Bill amends subsection 8(2) of the
Parliamentary Superannuation Act 2004, so that the rate at
which the Commonwealth contributes to the relevant parliamentarians
superannuation fund is increased from 9 to 15.4 per cent of their
total remuneration per year.
Endnotes
- Subsection 8(2), Parliamentary Superannuation Act
2004.
- Graeme Selleck, Parliamentary Superannuation Bill 2004,
Bills Digest, No 131, Parliamentary Library, Canberra,
2003 04 at http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/bd/2003-04/04bd131.htm
(accessed 12 October 2006).
- Subsection 19(2) Superannuation Guarantee (Administration)
Act 1992.
- Cliff Bingham, Treasury Retirement Income Modelling Group,
Impact of Private Savings and Longer Carers on Retirement Savings ,
Paper presented to the 11th Colloquium of
Superannuation Researches, University of New South Wales, 7
July 2003, p. 6.
- Graeme Orr, Politicians pay fires debate , Courier
Mail, 14 September 2006, p. 26, suggests that starting
employer superannuation in the banking sector is at a rate of 14
per cent of salary. John Warhurst, Political gene pool awash
without a super top-up , Canberra Times, 14
September 2006 notes that ANU junior lecturer positions come with a
17 per cent of wages employer superannuation contribution.
- Australian Government, Department of Finance and
Administration, PSS and CSS Long Term Cost Report 2005,
Canberra, 2006, p. 3.
- Rule A2.2.1, PSS Trust Deed.
- Howard in wrong direction on super side , Canberra
Times, 10 September 2006. Department of Finance and
Administration staff have confirmed that this particular number is
calculated but state that it is not available to the public.
- The Rt Hon. John Howard MP, Prime Minister, Certain
Parliamentary Entitlements Media Release, 7 September
2006.
- Terry Sweetman, Pollies backflip on a few dollars more ,
Sunday Mail, 10 September 2006, p. 59 and no byline,
Howard in wrong directions on super side , Sunday
Canberra Times, 10 September 2006, p. 18.
- Graeme Orr op. cit. and John Warhurst op. cit.
- Katharine Murphy, Transparency needed , Age, 8
September 2006, p. 3.
- The Hon. Kim Beasley MP, Superannuation , Media
Statement, 7 September 2006.
- Senator Bob Brown, Brown says Howard using taxpayer s money to
calm back bench , Media Statement, 8 September 2006.
- Peter Andren MP, Boost super contributions for all Andren
Media Release, 7 September 2006.
- The Hon. Gary Nairn MP, Explanatory Memorandum Parliamentary
Superannuation Amendment Bill 2006, 11 October 2006, p. 1.
Author goes here ????
Date goes here ????
Bills Digest Service
Parliamentary Library
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the
Australian Parliament using information available at the time of
production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position
of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional
legal opinion.
Staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2006
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2006.
Back to top