Bills Digest no. 81 2005–06
Financial Framework Legislation Amendment
Bill (No. 2)
2005
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Glossary
|
Abbreviation
|
Full
term
|
|
2003 JCPAA Report
|
Inquiry into the Draft
Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill
|
|
ANAO
|
Australian National Audit
Office
|
|
ARC Act
|
Australian
Research Council Act 2001
|
|
ATSI Act
|
Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005
|
|
CRF
|
Consolidated Revenue
Fund
|
|
FFLA Act
|
Financial Framework
Legislation Amendment Act 2005.
|
|
FFLA Bill No. 2
|
Financial Framework
Legislation Amendment Bill (No.2) 2005
|
|
Finance Minister
|
Minister for Finance and
Administration
|
|
FMA Act
|
Financial Management
and Accountability Act 1997
|
|
FMA Act Agencies
|
Agencies that are subject
to the FMA Act. These Agencies are Departments of State,
Departments of the Parliament, and prescribed Agencies.
|
|
FMA Regulations
|
Financial Management
and Accountability Regulations 1997
|
|
FMLA Act 99
|
Financial Management
Legislation Amendment Act 1999
|
|
JCPAA
|
Joint Committee of Public
Accounts and Audit
|
|
NHMRC Act
|
National
Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992
|
|
SRC Act
|
Safety, Rehabilitation
and Compensation Act 1988
|
Financial Framework Legislation
Amendment Bill (No. 2)
2005
Date introduced: 8 December 2005
House: House of
Representatives
Portfolio: Finance and Administration
Commencement: Various (see below)
The purpose of the Financial Framework Legislation Amendment
Bill (No. 2) 2005 (FFLA Bill No. 2) includes:
- to amend provisions in nine Acts pertaining to Special Accounts
(Schedule 1)
- to amend the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act
1988 to authorise a practice whereby Comcare can make
compensation payments to employees through employers (Schedule 2)
- the SRC Act now requires that Comcare make payments directly to
employees
- to clarify that the annual Appropriation Acts are the authority
for:
- act of grace payments made under the Financial Management
and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) and
- special circumstances payments, authorised under the Public
Service Act 1999, when the purpose of the payment is covered
by the purpose of the appropriation (Schedule 3)
- to extend to law enforcement agencies the modified application
of the FMA Act that now applies to intelligence and security
agencies (Schedule 3)
- to clarify certain provisions in the Public Accounts and
Audit Committee Act 1951 (Schedule 3), and
- to clarify and update financial management provisions in other
Acts (Schedule 3).
The FFLA Bill No. 2 is similar, in some respects, to the
Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act 2005 (FFLA
Act), which commenced on 22 February 2005.(1) The main
purpose of the FFLA Act was to amend the wording in a number of
Acts to replace deeming provisions (see below) in the FMA Act and
align their wording with the FMA Act. Features common to both the
FFLA Bill No. 2 and the FFLA Act include:
- the FFLA Act made redundant, for specified Acts, the deeming
provisions of the
Financial Management Legislation Amendment Act 1999 (FMLA
Act 99)
- the FFLA Bill No. 2 proposes to make the deeming provisions
redundant for the Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander Act 2005
- the FFLA Bill No. 2 proposes to implement some recommendations
of the 2003 Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit (JCPAA)
report,
Inquiry into the Draft Financial Framework Legislation Amendment
Bill.(2)
- the FFLA Act also implemented some of the Committee s
recommendations
- the FFLA Bill No. 2 proposes additional consolidating of powers
to make decisions about certain financial matters in the Finance
Minister by transferring these powers from the Treasurer
- aligning the provisions in certain Acts with the financial
management provisions in other Acts, and
- repealing redundant Acts.
Additional background can be found in the Bills Digest
for the Financial Framework Legislation Bill 2004 (FFLA Bill
04). FFLA Bill 04 became the FFLA Act.
The FFLA Bill No. 2 also contains amendments that are unrelated
to the FFLA Act. They are discussed below under Main Provisions
.
The FMA Act is the main Act governing the financial activities
of Commonwealth agencies. The FMLA Act 99 which came into effect on
1 July 1999 amended the FMA Act as part of the adoption of accrual
budgeting. The FMLA Act 99 applied to dozens of other Acts. This,
in turn, required replacing the wording of these other Acts. To
sidestep the problem of having to replace the wording immediately,
the FMLA Act 99 contained deeming provisions. (The deeming
provisions are summarised in paragraph 13 of the Explanatory
Memorandum for the FFLA Bill No. 2). The deeming provisions were
thus an interim measure pending replacement of the wording of these
other Acts. The FFLA Act replaced the wording for a number of Acts
thereby rendering the deeming provisions redundant for those
Acts.
As noted, one of the purposes of the FFLA Bill No. 2 is to amend
the Special Accounts provisions of nine Acts. A Special Account is,
in essence, an accounting/administrative convenience whereby all
receipts and payments related to a particular purpose/matter are
recorded. A Special Account also allows money to be earmarked
(credited) for the purpose for which the Account is established.
Special Accounts are components of the Consolidated Revenue Fund
(CRF), that is, Special Accounts record amounts that are already in
the CRF. Special Accounts can be established by either a
Determination of the Finance Minister made under the FMA Act or by
separate legislation.
Commencement: The day after Royal Assent.
Paragraph 14 of the Explanatory Memorandum states that the FFLA
Bill No. 2 would make redundant the application of the deeming
provisions of the FMLA Act 99 to the Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander Act 2005 (ATSI Act).
Items 6 to 8,
10, 12, 13, and
17 to 19 do this by substituting
Account for Fund (as in the FFLA Act).
Items 1 and 2 convert the Land
Fund into the Land Account, while Item 5 confirms
that the Land Account is a Special Account. Item 5 also requires
any unspent money in the Land Account to be invested, and for any
income from that investment to be credited to the Land Account.
One of the deeming provisions relates to the concept of a
self-executing CRF whereby any money the Executive Government
receives automatically forms part of the CRF, that is, the money
does not have to be credited to an account in the CRF or deposited
in a bank account before it becomes part of the CRF. Item
15 repeals the note in subsection 193E(3) of the ATSI Act
because it is redundant under this concept.
Part 2 Aboriginal Land (Lake Condah
and Framlingham Forest) Act 1987
The JCPAA considered that a review
was warranted of the effectiveness of the FMA Act following the
adoption of accrual budgeting. As part of this process, the JCPAA
tabled its 2003 report,
Inquiry into the Draft Financial Framework Legislation Amendment
Bill. Recommendation 4 of the 2003 JCPAA Report was that
the draft Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Bill (which was
the basis of the FFLA Act) should include an amendment to establish
the Aboriginal Advancement Account and, secondly, that the Condah
Land Account and the Framlingham Forest Account should be subsumed
into the Aboriginal Advancement Account. The FFLA Act implemented
the first part of Recommendation 4; Part 2
implements the second part. Item 20 establishes
the Aboriginal Advancement Account as a Special Account, and states
that the purpose of the Account is to make payments to further the
social and economic advancement of Aboriginal people living in
Victoria . Item 20 also allows the Special Account to be notionally
divided into sub-accounts, and for payments from a sub-account to
be made to particular Aboriginal groups living in Victoria.
The FFLA Act amended Acts that established Special Accounts
before 1 July 1999. The FFLA Act replaced, with Notes, provisions
in these Acts that authorised the crediting of amounts to an
Account that are appropriated by Parliament for the purposes of the
Account. The Notes refer to the general authority provided in the
Appropriation Acts to credit amounts to Special Accounts and take
the following form:
An Appropriation Act provides for amounts to be
credited to a Special Account if any of the purposes of the Account
is a purpose that is covered by an item in the Appropriation
Act.
Put another way, whereas the Appropriation Acts previously
appropriated amounts to specific Special Accounts, the authority
referred to in the Note is more general in that any amount in the
Appropriation Act that covers the purpose of a Special Account must
be credited to that Special Account.
Paragraph 4.69 of the 2003 JCPAA Report concluded that there is
merit in ensuring complete alignment of references in all Acts that
establish Special Accounts. As noted, the FFLA Act amended Acts
that established Special Accounts before 1 July 1999.
Paragraph 34 of the Explanatory Memorandum states that:
The FFLA Bill proposes the same type of amendments
to Acts that have established Special Accounts after 1 July
1999.
The Australian
Research Council Act 2001 (ARC Act) established the ARC
Research Endowment (Special) Account after 1 July 1999.
Item 21 aligns the provisions in the ARC Act, with
respect to bequeaths, by inserting the Note relating to the general
authority quoted above. The consequence is that any amounts
bequeathed for the purpose of undertaking research must be credited
to the ARC Research Endowment Account.
According to the Explanatory Memorandum, Part 4
introduces amendments to the Child
Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 that the
Department of Family and Community Services (FaCS) sought but which
were not incorporated into the FFLA Act. The 2003 JCPAA Report
supported FaCS s proposals and the Government in turn supported the
JCPAA s conclusion. According to the Explanatory Memorandum, the
amendments in Part 4 would:
- broaden the types of amounts that can be credited to the Child
Support Account (Item 22)
- prevent the crediting of the same amount twice to the Child
Support Account (Item 23), and
- broaden the types of payments that can be made from the Child
Support Account (Item 24).
The Explanatory Memorandum contains examples of the sorts of
matters the amendments would address.
Part 5 Gene Technology Act
2000
Parts 5, 6 and 7 contain
similar provisions.
Item 25 of Part 5 repeals
paragraph 130(1)(a) of the Gene
Technology Act 2000. This paragraph provides that all
money appropriated by the Parliament for the purposes of the Gene
Technology Account must be credited to that Account. As noted, the
FFLA Act replaced such provisions (in the Acts to which it applied)
with a Note that refers to the general authority provided in the
Appropriation Acts to credit amounts to Special Accounts.
Item 28 inserts this Note into subsection
130(1).
Similar to the Gene Technology Act
2000, paragraph 100B(1)(a) of the Industrial
Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989 provides
that all money appropriated by the Parliament for the purposes of
the Industrial Chemicals Account must be credited to that Account.
Item 29 similarly repeals paragraph 100B(1)(a)
while Item 30 adds the Note that
refers to the general authority provided in the Appropriation Acts
to credit amounts to Special Accounts.
Similarly, Items 31 and 32
respectively apply in the case of the National
Blood Authority Act 2003.
The Minister s second reading speech notes that the proposed
amendments relating to the Medical Research Endowment Account and
the Natural Resources Management Account differ from the FFLA Act
in that they transfer power to receive money on trust from the
Finance Minister to relevant portfolio Ministers.
Item 33 transfers responsibility for dealing
with money held on trust (or subject to conditions) from the
Minister for Finance to the Minister responsible for administering
the National
Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992 (NHMRC
Act).
Item 34 allows the Minister to delegate
responsibility for money held on trust to the Chief Executive
Officer of the NHMRC or to an Australian Public Service employee of
the Department responsible for administering the NHMRC Act.
As in Part 8, Item 37 transfers responsibility
for dealing with money held on trust (or subject to conditions)
from the Minister for Finance to the Minister responsible for
administering the Act, in this case the Natural
Resources Management (Financial Assistance) Act 1992.
Similar to Item 34 in Part 8, Item 39 allows the
Minister to delegate trust obligations to the Secretary of the
Department or to an employee of the Department that administers the
Act.
Commencement: The later of 1 July 2006 and the day after Royal
Assent.
Schedule 2 amends the Safety,
Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SRC Act) in
several respects. First, the amendments seek to ensure that the Act
authorises administrative practices that agencies have adopted with
respect to Comcare payments. By way of background, the Australian
National Audit Office (ANAO), in its report titled
Management of Trust Monies, found:
Some organisations have developed processes to
make their administration of Comcare monies less onerous. The ANAO
found that many organisations continue to make salary payments to
incapacitated employees, through normal payroll mechanisms, both
while a claim is being determined by Comcare, and on an on-going
basis if a claim is successful. To support this practice, Comcare
makes payments to organisations, rather than to individual
employees, effectively reimbursing organisations for the salary
payments already made.
The ANAO also noted that:
organisations, including Comcare, consider the
current practice to be administratively more efficient than the
practice of administering Comcare receipts as prescribed in the SRC
Act and the F[inance] M[inister s] O[rders].
However:
this practice does not align with requirements of
the SRC Act.(3)
In particular, the SRC Act requires Comcare to make compensation
payments directly to employees; it does not permit the practice
whereby Comcare makes payments indirectly through employers.
Because the SRC Act does not support current practice, the ANAO
recommended that:
Comcare Australia initiates a review of the
process for administering compensation payments under the
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 to ensure
that the process represents the efficient, effective and ethical
use of Commonwealth resources while protecting the rights and
entitlements of individuals concerned.(4)
The JCPAA also supported amendments to the SRC Act being
included in the FFLA Act to align the SRC Act with the practice
whereby Comcare makes compensation payments to
agencies.(5)
A second reason for the amendments is to eliminate anomalies in
the Act. Paragraphs 68, 88 and 105 of the Explanatory Memorandum
describe these anomalies.
Item 1 defines the pre-determination period .
This is the time starting on the day when the employee was injured
and ending on the day when Comcare makes a determination on the
employee s claim for compensation.
Item 3 inserts a new clause
23A into the SRC Act. It deals with
situations where an employee is injured, makes a compensation
claim, goes on leave while awaiting Comcare to make a determination
on the claim, the agency pays the employee s salary when he or she
is on leave, and then Comcare makes a determination favourable to
the employee. In these circumstances, the employee must repay the
salary received during the pre-determination period
[subclause 23A(2)]. This must be done by means of
a set-off of the salary etc. paid against the amount of
compensation [subclause 23A(3)]; a set-off is
necessary to prevent the employee from being over-compensated.
Either Comcare [paragraph 23A(3)(a)] or the
employer [paragraph 23A(3)(b)] must make the
set-off. Comcare can make the set-off where Comcare pays
compensation to the employee; the employer must make the set-off
where Comcare tells the employer that Comcare intends to make the
compensation payment to the employer who then pays the employee
[paragraph 23A(3)(b)]. The Note at the end of
paragraph 23A(3)(b) explains that where the compensation exceeds
the salary paid, the employee will receive the excess. The making
of a set-off discharges Comcare of liability to pay the
compensation [subclause 23A(4)]. If Comcare makes
the set-off, it must pay the set-off to the employer
[subclause 23A(5)]; in effect, this reimburses the
employer for the costs the employer incurred while the employee was
on leave. If the salary paid is less than the compensation, the
difference is recoverable from the employee [subclause
23A(8)]. If the salary the employer paid was for leave of
absence, the employer must restore the employee s leave credit so
that the employee is not disadvantaged by losing his or her leave
entitlement [subclause 23A(9)].
As noted, the SRC Act now requires Comcare to make compensation
payments directly to the employee. Item 5 inserts
clauses 112A and 112B. Both
clauses allow compensation payments to be made to employees through
employers. The main difference between the two clauses is that
Clause 112A relates to payments made from public money essentially
money that the Commonwealth controls or is controlled on the
Commonwealth s behalf and so applies, for example, to government
departments; clause 112B, on the other hand, applies to payments
that are not paid from public money and so apply, for example, to
companies registered under the Commonwealth Authorities and
Companies Act 1997, that are separate legal entities from the
Commonwealth. Subclause 112A(2) allows Comcare to
make payments to the employer, who must then pass on the payments
to the employee subject to any set-off [subclause
112A(4)]. Passing on Comcare payments relieves the
employer of the liability to pay the compensation
[subclause 112A(5)].
Note: there seems to be an error in the wording
of paragraphs 91 and 99 of the Explanatory Memorandum. Both
paragraphs contain the sentence:
This would be an alternative to Comcare paying
compensation directly to the employer.
In the context of the paragraphs, replacing employer with
employee makes sense.
Commencement: Items 1 to 9 and 11 to 37 commence on the day
after Royal Assent; Item 10 commences on 24 March 2005.
Part 2 Australian Institute of
Marine Science Act 1972
As noted, the FFLA Act transferred from the Treasurer to the
Finance Minister approval power related to matters such as the
borrowing and money raising by entities that are legally separate
from the Commonwealth (for example, the Australian Broadcasting
Corporation). The FFLA Act also transferred from the Treasurer to
the Finance Minister the power to delegate responsibility to an
official. Item 2 gives the Finance Minister power
to delegate to an official in the case of the Australian
Institute of Marine Science Act 1972.
Section 33 of the FMA Act relates to act of grace payments and
authorises the Finance Minister to make such payments. Subsection
33(4) provides that payments under subsection 33(4) are to be made
out of money appropriated by the Parliament for the purposes of
this section. Item 3 repeals subsection 33(4)
while Item 4 substitutes a Note. The Note retains
the essence of subsection 33(4) and adds that an act of grace
payment can be debited against an Agency s annual appropriation,
provided that it relates to some matter that has arisen in the
course of its administration or otherwise relates to the Agency s
outcomes. In short, if the payment falls within the purpose for
which an annual appropriation is made, the payment can be debited
against that purpose.
Section 58 of the FMA Act is titled
Modifications of Act for intelligence or security agency .
Section 58 provides:
(1) The application of this Act to an intelligence or security
agency is subject to any modifications that are prescribed by the
regulations.
(2) In this section:
intelligence or security agency has
the meaning given by section 85ZL of the Crimes Act
1914.
modifications includes additions,
omissions and substitutions.
Item 5 of Part 3 adds or to a
prescribed law enforcement agency to subsection 58(1) of the FMA
Act while Item 6 adds the definition of a
prescribed law enforcement agency to subsection 58(2), i.e. a law
enforcement agency within the meaning of section 85ZL of the
Crimes Act 1914 prescribed by the FMA Regulations for the
purposes of the definition. Item 5 thus extends to
law enforcement agencies the modifications to the FMA Act that now
apply to intelligence and security agencies. In the Second Reading
Speech, the Minister gave the following reason for the
amendment:
Some law enforcement agencies need to undertake
sensitive activities that are similar in nature to those of
intelligence and security agencies. It is therefore appropriate
that they be able to access the same modified application of the
FMA Act for those sensitive activities, subject to ministerial
agreement and consideration by parliament through an amendment to
the FMA Regulations that would prescribe a law enforcement agency
for this purpose.(6)
The funding of and payments by intelligence and security
agencies require special processes and authorisations and so are
necessarily not subject to the usual provisions of the FMA Act.
This is achieved through the modified application of the FMA Act.
The extension of the modifications to the law enforcement agencies
would place these agencies on the same basis as the intelligence
and security agencies. Attachment A of the Explanatory memorandum
lists the law enforcement agencies to which the amendment would
apply.
As noted, the FFLA Bill No. 2 proposes further consolidating
powers to make decisions about investment, money raisings and other
financial matters in the Finance Minister, by transferring these
powers from the Treasurer. This transfer of approval powers was
also an aspect of the FFLA Act. Item 7 does this
for the Native
Title Act 1993.
The Public
Service Act 1999 empowers the Public Service Minister to
make special circumstances payments where the circumstances arose
in the course of employment by the Commonwealth. Item
36 inserts a Note whose purpose is to clarify that the
authority for such payments derives from the agency s annual
appropriation when the purpose of the payment is covered by the
purpose of the appropriation.
Commencement: The day after Royal Assent.
Item 1 repeals the Employment
Services Act 1994 and Item 2 repeals the
Loan Act
1977. The reasons for the repeal of the former Act are
contained in paragraph 153 of the Explanatory Memorandum. The FFLA
Act repealed redundant Loan Acts. Item 2 repeals the Loan Act
1977 because it relates to the financial year ended 30 June
1978 and therefore is no longer applicable.
Concluding comments
The FFLA Bill No. 2 contains some notable features. They include
extending some of the measures contained in the FFLA Act to other
Acts thus increasing consistency in the financial provisions across
different Acts. The amendments to the SRC Act have the support of
the JCPAA, Comcare and agencies, and enshrine an efficient
practice.
The reason for some amendments is not clear. In particular, the
Minister s second reading speech notes that the proposed amendments
relating to the Medical Research Endowment Account and the Natural
Resources Management Account differ from the FFLA Act in that they
transfer power to receive money on trust from the Finance Minister
to relevant portfolio Ministers. The reason the Minister gives is
that:
Under the devolved financial management framework
that now applies in the Commonwealth public sector, it is
appropriate that these powers be exercised by the minister
responsible for the acts that establish these special
accounts.(7)
It could be argued that if a Minister administers an Act
containing a Special Account, in general, responsibility for that
Special Account should rest with the Minister and not the Finance
Minister.
- The Bill for the FFLA Act the Financial Framework Legislation
Amendment Bill 2004 was introduced into the House of
Representatives on 1 December 2004.
-
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/jpaa/financial_bill/contents.htm.
- ANAO, Report 18, Management of Trust monies, 2002-03,
pp. 37 38.
- ibid.
- JCPAA, Inquiry into the Draft Financial Framework
Legislation Amendment Bill, paragraph 5.34, p. 59.
- House of Representatives, Debates, 8 December 2005, p.
17.
- ibid.
Richard Webb
Economics, Commerce and Industrial Relations Section
16 January 2006
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the
Australian Parliament using information available at the time of
production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position
of the Information and Research Service, nor do they constitute
professional legal opinion.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2005
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2005.
Back to top