Bills Digest No. 66, 2004–05
Family and Community Services and Veterans' Affairs
Legislation Amendment (2004 Election Commitments) Bill
2004
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Family and Community Services and Veterans' Affairs
Legislation Amendment (2004 Election Commitments) Bill
2004
Date Introduced: 18 November 2004
House: House of
Representatives
Portfolio: Family and Community Services and Veterans'
Affairs
Commencement: There is a variety of commencement dates for
different parts of this Bill, as set out in the Table in
Clause 2 of the Bill.
This Bill proposes to amend the Social Security Act
1999 (SSA), the Veterans Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA)
and the A New Tax System (Family Assistance) Act
1999 (FAA) to give effect to several 2004 Election
commitments made by the government. The commitments are in respect
of self-funded retirees, older Australians, carers on income
support, grandparents caring for children and certain Veterans
Affairs disability pensioners.
Schedule 1 proposes to amend the SSA and the
VEA to introduce a new utilities allowance (UA) for recipients of
the age pension and the veterans age service pension. It is also
proposed to pay the UA to recipients of the veterans income support
supplement (ISS) and also to those receiving the invalidity service
pension and who are aged more than service pension age, which is
age 60 for males.(1) Invalidity service pension can be
paid up to age 65 and there would be a few recipients aged 60 to
64.
The new UA is proposed to be $100 a year for a single pensioner
and $50 a year each for a partnered pensioner and this rate is to
be indexed twice annually to the CPI.
The government announced the new UA in its 2004 Election policy
platform, Recognising senior Australians their needs and their
carers.(2) The policy platform claims the new UA
will benefit around 2.2 million older Australians at a cost of
$594.6 million over four years.(3) The Explanatory
Memorandum attached to the Bill details that the anticipated cost
of this proposal is $610.1 million over four years.
The government s justification for the new UA was set out in the
2004 election policy platform, being:
older Australians on income support receive access
to one of a number of concession cards that provide access to
cheaper prescriptions and a range of other benefits. Nonetheless,
the Coalition recognises that some older Australians who rely on
income support payments can experience difficulty in saving up to
pay regular household bills such as the gas or electricity
bill.(4)
It is proposed to pay the UA twice yearly on 20 March and 20
September of each year. So for single pensioners entitled to the UA
of $100 a year, $50 will be paid each in March and September. The
20th of March and the 20th of September is
also the date on which the twice yearly indexation of the pension
rate and the ISS rate to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and to 25%
of Male Total Average Weekly Earnings (MTAWE) occurs.
The new UA is proposed to be paid to all recipients of the age
pension and the veterans age service pension. It is also proposed
to provide the UA to recipients of the veterans ISS and invalidity
service pension who are aged more than age service pension age. ISS
is an income support payment, paid in addition to the veterans war
widows /ers pension, to those whose income and assets fall below
the pensions income and assets test limits.
By limiting the new UA to age pension, service pension, ISS and
invalidity service pension recipients over age or service pension
age, the UA is targeted at retired aged Australians who are on
lower levels of income. The age pension, the service pension, the
ISS and the invalidity service pension all have the same income and
asset test limits.
The principle difference between
the civilian age pension provided under the SSA and the age service
pension provided under the VEA is the age service pension is
available to qualified veterans five years earlier than the age
pension. For males the age pension qualification age is 65 and for
the veterans age service pension it is age 60. For females the age
pension age is being incrementally raised from age 55 up to age
60.(5) Likewise the qualification age for females to
qualify for the veterans age service pension is being incrementally
raised from age 55 up to age 60.(6)
Age pension, age service pension, ISS and invalidity service
pension recipients are issued with the Pensioner Concession Card
(PCC). The PCC entitles the holder to subsidised medicines under
the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). As well as this, the PCC
may also provide access to extra concessions from state and local
government authorities. These concessions may include:
-
reductions in property and water rates
-
reductions in energy bills
-
-
reduced fares on public transport
-
reductions on motor vehicle registration
-
one or more free rail journeys within the state each year
PCC concessions vary from state to
state and some of these extra concessions are also available to
dependents.
It is only proposed to provide the UA to older Australians on a
government income support payment, being those who have reached the
age pension or age service pension qualifying age. However, there
are other like income support recipients to age and service
pensioners to whom this Bill does not propose to provide a UA.
These are widow B pensioners, parenting payment single pensioners
(commonly referred to as sole parent pensioners), disability
support pensioners, invalidity service pensioners (aged less than
service pension age) and carer payment recipients (commonly called
carer pension). These pension payment recipients are paid at the
same rate as age and service pensioners, have the same income and
assets tests and are also issued with a PCC.
Schedule 2 of the Bill proposes to introduce a
new seniors concession allowance for some self-funded
retirees.(7) The new allowance will be $200 a year paid
in two instalments on 1 June and 1 December of each year. Not all
self-funded retires are to be paid the allowance, only those
entitled to a Commonwealth Seniors Health Care Card (CSHC).
The government announced the new seniors concession allowance in
its 2004 Election policy platform, Recognising senior
Australians their needs and their carers.(8) The
policy platform claimed that there are now over 287,000 self-funded
retirees with a CSHC and the new seniors concession allowance of
$200 per person per year would cost $282.6 million over four
years.(9) The Explanatory Memorandum attached to the
Bill details that the anticipated cost of this proposal is $258.3
million over four years.
The Policy platform claimed that the justification for the new
seniors concession allowance was:
The Coalition has sought to provide self funded
retirees with further concessions, offering state and territory
governments $75 million. Unfortunately, no state or territory
government has taken up this offer that would provide concessions
for energy, rates, water and sewerage and motor vehicle
registration costs. A re-elected Coalition Government will not wait
for state and territory governments to provide self funded retirees
holding a Commonwealth Seniors Health Card with the concessions
they deserve.(10)
The Bill proposes that the seniors concession allowance be
provided to all holders of the CSHC. Holders of the CSHC are those
who are over age pension age but not receiving an age or service
pension due to income or assets and have annual income below
$50,000 for a single or $80,000 (combined) for a couple.
The rate of the seniors concession allowance is to be $200 per
person per year. This means a couple would be paid $400 a year. The
$200 allowance is to be indexed to the CPI. The Bill proposes the
allowance be paid in two instalments per year on 1 June and 1
December of each year.
In July 2001, the commonwealth government announced it had
commenced negotiations with the states/territories to provide a
wider range of concessions for CSHC holders.(11) The
commonwealth was unable to come to an agreement with the states
about the provision of concessions to CSHC holders.(12)
The commonwealth claimed their offer would have saved CSHC holders
an average of nearly $700 a year on their rates, car registration,
electricity charges, water and sewerage. The commonwealth
government s claim was that it had offered the states and
territories $75 million to provide these concessions for CSHC
holders and that all states/territories, excluding Western
Australia and South Australia, rejected the offer during a meeting
of Community and Disability Services Ministers in
Hobart.(13)
The CSHC was introduced from July 1994. The main benefit with
the CSHC is it entitles the holder to subsidised medicines under
the PBS. However, the CSHC does not provide access to the
concessions available with the PCC. The concessions pensioners are
able to access with the PCC are outlined above in the section
titled Other concessions provided to age pension, age service
pension, ISS, and invalidity service pension recipients in the
background comments about Schedule 1.
Initially, the CSHC was available to people of age pension age
whose income was low enough for them to qualify for the age
pension, but who were not eligible for some other reason. The most
common reasons were insufficient length of residence in Australia
and asset holdings which prevented them from satisfying the assets
test. The original purpose of the card was to provide extra
assistance to retired persons who were on low-income. With the
income limits the same as for the age pension, the vast majority of
retired people issued with a CSHC were those who were asset rich
but income poor, mostly farmers.
From January 1999, the income test for the CSHC was changed to
one based on taxable income and the income limits were
substantially increased.(14) The increased income test
limits introduced at this time changed the nature of the CSHC. It
ceased to be targeted at low-income retirees and was now available
for middle-income retirees.
The 2001-02 Budget included a measure to further increase the
income limits.(15) In addition, CSHC holders were made
eligible for the Telephone Allowance (worth $68.80 per annum) that
had previously been available only to pensioners. The new income
limits were $50,000 for a single person and $80,000 for a couple
(combined). These new income limits, coupled with the fact the
income test is now one of adjusted taxable income, means the CSHC
is no longer a low-income card for self-funded retirees.
It has been a long-standing complaint of self-funded retirees
that they are not able to access the PCC concessions available to
pensioners.
Provision of concessions to pensioners was originally intended
as recognition that to qualify for a pension under the income and
asset tests a person must be on low income. Also, many pensioners
are long-term income support recipients, for example, widow
pensioners, age pensioners. Concessions therefore are aimed at
helping to relieve the burden of essential expenditure items for
low-income persons on long-term income support.
However, self-funded retirees have for a long time seen it as
unfair that pensioners have been provided with concessions and they
have not. Common comments and complaints are:
I have done the right thing by saving and
working hard to provide for my own retirement - why don t I get
concessions?
Self-funded retirees consider that, given they are not on a
pension and a not burden on the taxpayer, they too should have
access to concessions.
Schedule 3 of the Bill proposes to amend the
SSA to allow carer payment (commonly referred to as carer pension)
recipients up to 25 hours a week absent from their caring role to
undertake training, voluntary work or paid work. The SSA currently
allows 20 hours a week.
This proposal to extend the carers allowable time off to train
or work from 20 to 25 hours was announced 2004 Election policy
platform, Recognising senior Australians their needs and their
carers.(16)
To provide more opportunities and flexibility for
carers to combine caring with work, training or study, a re-elected
Coalition Government will provide $19.0 million over four years to
increase the hours carers can participate in these activities
without losing eligibility for Carer Payment from 20 to 25 hours
per week.(17)
The election policy platform paper estimates this extension of
hours will cost an extra $19 million over four years. The
Explanatory Memorandum attached to the Bill details that the
anticipated cost of this proposal is $19.5 million over four years
from 1 April 2005.
Carer payment is a pension income support payment provided to
full-time carers providing the primary care to a person requiring
constant care. Provision of income support recognises that the
carer is unable to support themselves from employment because of
their full-time caring role. However, there are time restrictions
in the SSA on the time a carer can spend away from their caring
role for such activities as respite, work and education. This is
because of fears that if the carer was able to spend long periods
away from caring, they would no longer be providing constant care,
as is otherwise required by the legislation.(18) Section
198AC of the SSA allows the carer periods away from the caring for
certain prescribed reasons/activities and for prescribed periods,
for example hospitalisation of the caree (person being cared
for).
Originally, the carer pension, as it was then called, did not
allow the carer any time away from the caring role to work or train
part-time, as it was then considered to be at odds with the
constant care requirements. This has been progressively relaxed to
allow the carer to access respite, and also to allow the carer to
prepare for a possible future non-caring role and to maintain links
with employment opportunities.
Schedule 4 of the Bill proposes to introduce a
new special rate of Child Care Benefit (CCB) for grandparents that
are principal carers to cover the full cost of child care fees in
approved child care.
CCB is a payment to help families who use approved and
registered child care. Normally, how much CCB can be paid is
affected by:
-
the level of family income,
-
whether the child care used is approved care or registered child
care, and
-
whether the child is a school aged child.
This proposal to introduce a special CCB rate for grandparents
with a child in approved child care was announced 2004 Election
policy platform, Recognising senior Australians their needs and
their carer.(19) The platform stated:
A re-elected Coalition Government will also make
child care more accessible for grandparents in receipt of income
support, such as aged pension or carer payment, by enabling them to
access Special Rate Child Care Benefit. Special Rate Child Care
Benefit will cover the full cost of child care fees charged to
eligible grandparents. Grandparents will be able to access Special
Rate Child Care Benefit from 1 January 2005, subject to the passage
of legislation.(20)
The government claimed their extra assistance for child care for
grandparents would cost an additional $70 million over four years.
The Explanatory Memorandum attached to the Bill details that the
anticipated cost of this proposal is an extra $78.6 million over
four years from 1 January 2005.
The 2004 election policy platform presented the rationale for
this proposed special rate of CCB for grandparents using approved
child care as:
Grandparents who have responsibility for the
primary care of young grandchildren face the same challenges as
younger parents. However, many grandparents do not enjoy the
health, energy or vigour that can often be needed to care full time
for these children. Although grandparents have access to assistance
such as parenting payment, family tax benefit, and child care
benefit, caring for young grandchildren can also be financially
draining.(21)
The new special CCB rate is to be payable to a grandparent and
great-grandparent who is the child s grandparent (or
great-grandparent) by birth, or by adoption or by relationship as a
step-parent. This excludes other older age adult carers of
children, who are not the child s grandparent, like great
aunts/uncles, from receiving the new special rate CCB.
To be qualified for the special CCB grandparent rate, the
grandparent needs to be on an income support payment provided under
the SAA or the VEA. Also, the grandparent needs to be the sole or
major provider on a daily basis for the child and have substantial
autonomy for day-to-day decisions about the child s care, welfare
and development. This is very much the same care requirements
required to qualify for family tax benefit (FTB) for a child.
However, the Bill does not link or require qualification to the
special CCB rate to qualification to FTB. It would have been easy
to require the qualification to the special CCB rate to
qualification to FTB. This means a grandparent could not qualify
for the special CCB rate without also being qualified for and in
receipt of FTB. Perhaps the legislators wanted some flexibility to
allow payment of the special CCB rate, even where the claimant wasn
t receiving FTB for the same child. This might occur where FTB is
still being claimed by and paid to another adult (for example the
parent), but the grandparent is the provider on a daily basis for
the child and have substantial autonomy for day-to-day decisions
about the child s care.
Approved child care is care provided by a service provider that
has been approved to receive CCB payments on behalf of eligible
families. Most long day care, family day care, before and after
school care, vacation care, some occasional care and some in-home
care are approved child care providers.
Where a child is in approved child care, CCB can be paid to help
with the child care fee charged by the child care centre. Often the
amount of CCB paid is less than the fee charged. The difference, if
any, in the fee charged by an approved child care provider and the
maximum CCB paid, is an out-of-pocket expense for the parent.
The amount of CCB that can be paid for approved child care
depends on:
-
the number of hours of care used,
-
the individuals CCB percentage, and
-
whether the child is a school child or a non-school child.
All eligible families using approved child care can get up to 20
hours of CCB a week. CCB can be claimed for up to 50 hours a week
in approved child care if the claimant or partner are working or
looking for work, training, studying or exempt from this
requirement. CCB can be claimed for more than 50 hours a week if
the claimant or partner are not available to care for the child for
more than 50 hours a week because of work, study or training
commitments (including travel to and from work).
The proposed special rate of CCB for grandparents in this Bill
is only to be paid in respect of approved child care, not
registered child care.
Registered child care is care for work related purposes that is
provided by grandparents, relatives, friends or nannies who are
registered with the Family Assistance Office. Registered child care
also includes care provided by some private preschools,
kindergartens, some outside school hours care services and some
occasional care centres.
CCB can be claimed for up to 50 hours a week in registered child
care if claimant or partner (if have one) are working or looking
for work, training, studying or exempt from this requirement.
Often the amount of CCB paid is less than the registered child
care fee charged. The difference, if any, in the fee charged by a
registered child care provider and the maximum CCB paid, is an
out-of-pocket expense for the parent.
The special rate of CCB for grandparents in this Bill is not
proposed to be paid in respect of registered child care.
For CCB purposes, a school child is a child who attends primary
or secondary school. CCB rates for school children are 85 per cent
of the rates for non-school children.
This Bill proposes a new rate of CCB for some grandparents with
a child in approved child care, being those where the grandparent
is in receipt of a government income support payment. This is like
the current CCB payment rules, where the family in receipt of a
government income support payment, for example age pension,
parenting payment single, newstart allowance, the maximum rate of
CCB is automatically payable.
This Bill proposes to pay the full child care fee charged by the
child care centre for approved child care, where the grandparent is
on an income support payment. It is not proposed to pay the special
CCB for a child in registered child care.
There were 22,500 grandparent families with children aged 0-17
years in Australia in 2003.(22) The ABS Family
Characteristic Survey 2004 presented some other features of
grandparents caring for grandchildren being:
-
These families represented around one percent of all families
with children aged 0-17 years,
-
In the majority of grandparent families (73 per cent), the age
of the youngest child was between 5 and 14 years,
-
In 39% of grandparent families, the younger partner or lone
grandparent was younger than 55 years, while in the majority (61%)
of grandparent families, the younger partner or lone grandparent
was aged 55 years or more,
-
In around one-third (34 per cent) of grandparent families, one
or both grandparents were employed, and 62 per cent received a
government pension, benefit or allowance as their main source of
income,
-
Over two-thirds (71 per cent) of the 31,100 children in
grandparent families had their natural parent(s) living
elsewhere.(23)
Schedule 5 of the Bill proposes to increase the
rate of the bereavement payment, paid to the surviving partner of a
deceased veteran, where the veteran was paid above 100 per cent of
the general rate of disability pension. This will apply to
surviving veterans partners where the veteran was receiving the
disability pension paid at the rates for:
-
-
Special rate (Totally and Permanently Incapacitated (T&PI)
or blinded), and
-
Extreme Disablement Adjustment.
The policy of increasing the bereavement payment to surviving
partners of a deceased veteran, where the veteran was paid above
100 per cent general rate of disability pension, was announced in
the 2004 election campaign. The policy was contained in the
Saluting their service policy platform.(24) The
policy platform stated:
Bereavement payments are made to surviving
partners to assist in the transition to one income following the
death of a veteran. For veterans in receipt of the above general
rate of the disability pension, only part of the disability pension
is currently included in this calculation. The Coalition will
ensure that the bereavement payment for eligible dependents of
those in receipt of the above general rate of the disability
pension, the most disabled of our veterans, equals the total
pension received by a veteran at the time of his death and will be
paid to the surviving partner for a period of twelve weeks.
The government claimed in their policy platform that the
increase in the bereavement payment would benefit 2,200 surviving
partners per year at a cost of $12.8 million over four
years.(25) The Explanatory Memorandum attached to the
Bill estimates the cost for this proposal at $14.8 million over
four years.
There are three separate veterans disability
pension payments, paid above the general rate see above. Each is
not payable concurrently and each has different payment rates.
An explanation of these three higher disability
pension rates is set out below.
The intermediate rate is potentially payable where the veteran
is assessed as having a 70 per cent or more disability (using the
assessment for the general rate) and it also assessed that the
veteran is unable to work for at least 20 hours a week. Section 23
of the VEA sets out the qualification conditions for the
intermediate rate of disability pension.(26)
The intermediate rate is not always payable where the disability
assessment is 70 per cent or more. For example, a veteran may be
assessed as having an 80 per cent disability but may also be able
to work for more than 20 hours a week. In this case the
intermediate rate is not payable, only the 80 per cent general rate
is paid.
The intermediate rate, in paying a higher rate than the 100 per
cent general rate, recognises the resultant work inability of the
veteran arising from their war caused/related illness/injury, so
has a component for income support. Other than the 20 hours a week
test there are a few other situations where the intermediate rate
can be paid, for example suffering from pulmonary tuberculosis.
The special rate disability pension is commonly referred to as
the Totally and Permanently Incapacitated (T&PI) disability
pension. Section 24 of the VEA sets out the qualification
conditions for the intermediate rate of disability
pension.(27)
The special rate works very much like the intermediate rate, but
the incapacity for work test is tougher. The special rate is
potentially payable where the veteran is assessed as having a 70
per cent or more disability (using the assessment for the general
rate). Where the 70 per cent or more is attained, and it also
assessed that the veteran is unable to work for at least 8 hours a
week, then the special rate is payable.
Other than the 8 hours a week test there are a few other
situations where the special rate can be paid, for example where
the veteran has pulmonary tuberculosis (TB). Where the veteran has
TB, it is assumed the disability and inability to work requirements
are automatically met and the special rate is paid.
For the special rate, where a veteran has reached 65 years of
age, additional criteria apply. The last paid work, which is
precluded by the incapacity, must have commenced prior to 65 and
the veteran must have been employed in it for at least 10 years.
Retired veterans, aged 65 or more, with very severe disabilities,
might be entitled to an Extreme Disablement Adjustment rate see
below.
The Extreme Disablement Adjustment rate disability pension can
only be considered for veterans who have reached 65 years of age
and who are entitled to a disability pension at 100 per cent
general rate but are also not eligible to receive a special rate or
intermediate rate pension. As the veteran is aged 65 or more and no
longer of working age, the inability to work tests for either 20
hours a week (that is used for intermediate rate) or 8 hours a week
(that is used for special rate) are not applied. Instead a test
requiring 70 medical points or more and at least 6 out of 7
lifestyle points is applied to qualify for Extreme Disablement
Adjustment.
Section 22 of the VEA sets out the qualification conditions for
the Extreme Disablement Adjustment rate of disability
pension.(28)
The current general rate of disability pension payable at 100
per cent is $296.40 per fortnight (pf). The current rates of
disability pension rates paid above the general rate are set out
below:
-
Special rate (T&PI, blinded or TTI) - $789.20pf
-
Intermediate rate - $543.40pf
-
Extreme Disablement Adjustment (EDA) - $446.90pf
Current bereavement payment rates
for disability pension paid above the general rate
Currently, there is a bereavement payment arrangement where the
veteran receiving disability pension dies. A surviving partner of a
disability pensioner is entitled to a bereavement payment which is
a lump sum equal to 6 fortnightly instalments (that is 12 weeks) of
pension at the rate which was paid prior to death. Bereavement
payment is designed to give the surviving partner an adequate level
of income while they make funeral arrangements, settle financial
affairs, perhaps even look for work and generally sort out their
ongoing financial support needs.
However, currently, for those disability pensioners paid above
the 100 per cent general disability rate, this twelve week lump sum
payment is confined to a maximum of the 100 per cent disability
pension rate. The lump-sum is not calculated at the rate of
disability pension provided prior to the death of the veteran.
Not all disability pension payment rates, paid above the 100 per
cent of the general rate, are provided for in this Bill to have the
bereavement payment paid to a surviving partner. There are two
other disability pension payment rates paid above the 100 per cent
general rate not included. These are:
-
Special rate of disability pension paid where the veteran is
Totally and Temporarily Incapacitated (T&TI). Section 25 of the
VEA provides for this rate and it is paid at the same rate as the
T&PI Special rate.(29)
-
A higher rate of disability pension where the veteran has a
certain prescribed amputation. Section 27 of the VEA provides for
this rate.(30)
There is no explanation as to why these two disability pension
rates paid at a higher rate than the 100 per cent general rate are
not included in the Bill.
Schedule 1 utilities allowance
Part 1 Item 4 sets out the qualification
requirements and the payability of UA. See the discussion of this
in the background of this Bills Digest.
Items 5 and 6 sets out the rate and indexation
of UA., the details of which are discussed in the background of
this Bills Digest.
Item 8 sets out that a claim for UA is not
required and Item 9 that it is to be paid in two
instalments.
Part 1 of Schedule 1 places the new provisions
for UA into the SSA. Part 2 of Schedule 1 places
the like or equivalent provisions for the new UA into the VEA.
Item 4 places into the SSA the provisions for
the qualification for seniors concession allowance, the rate of
allowance and when payable, the details of which have been
discussed in the background of this Bills Digest.
Items 8 and 9 provide for the indexation of the
rate of the allowance to the CPI.
Item 13 contains transitional provisions to pay
the concession allowance as a one-off in 2004 in December,
notwithstanding the allowance will be normally provided in March
and September of each year.
Part 2 of Schedule 2 places similar provisions
into the VEA, as Part 1 of Schedule
2 did for the SSA, to provide for the payment of seniors
concession allowance.
Item 1 amends the SSA to change the number of
hours allowed away from care to work or study from 20 to 25 hours a
week.
Provisions in Schedule 4 amend the FAA to
provide for the proposed special rate CCB for grandparents with a
qualifying childs in approved child care.
Item 16 defines who is a grandparent, and
prescribes eligibility for the special CCB rate for grandparents.
Item 17 presents provisions for requirements to
provide information and action to deny payment on failure to
provide information. These are very like existing provisions
elsewhere in the act for other like claims for assistance.
Items 41 and 42 stops approved child care
centres from setting extraordinary fees for persons otherwise
entitled to the special CCB rate for grandparents, thereby taking
advantage of the fact the special CCB rate will cover 100 per cent
of the rate charged. A child care centre may set higher than normal
fees for child care, knowing the proposed special CCB rate for
approved child care will cover 100 per cent of the cost. This is
intended to stop this type of exploitation of the new
arrangements.
Item 1 amends the VEA to provide for the
payment of the bereavement payment, payable to the surviving
partner of certain disability pension recipients, at the same rate
as if the pensioner did not die. Item 1 makes this
amendment in respect of:
-
-
Special rate (T&PI, blinded or T&TI), and
-
Extreme Disablement Adjustment.
Item 3 provides that the disability pension
bereavement amount paid will be the same as the disability pension
rate paid as if the pensioner had not died.
All of the proposed initiatives presented in this Bill are
beneficial.
For Schedule 1, the proposed UA is only to be
provided to the retired age on a government income support
pension.
For Schedule 2, the proposed seniors concession
allowance, it is to be provided only to those self-funded referees
not on a government pension but entitled to a CSHC.
The special rate CCB proposed in Schedule 4
that is to be paid to grandparents, is very beneficial proposing to
cover to 100 per cent the child care costs in approved child care.
It may be considered discriminatory as it does not provide the same
assistance to other like older aged adults caring for young
children, who are not a grandparent in similar situations, for
example a great aunty or other non-related older aged adult.
The changes to the bereavement arrangements for veterans
disability pension presented in Schedule 5 could
be seen to be addressing an anomaly in the current arrangements.
However, there still are other disability pension rates paid, at
more than 100 per cent general rate, which will not benefit from
the Schedule 5 reforms.
-
Invalidity service pension is payable under the VEA to a veteran
who has qualifying war service and is aged less than 65 and is
unable to work at full award wages for at least 8 hours a week.
Qualifying war service in the VEA means has served in operations
against the enemy whilst in danger from hostile forces of the
enemy.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP,
Recognising senior Australians their needs and their
carers, Liberal Party of Australia, 2004 election policy
platform, 1 October 2004.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP,
Recognising senior Australians their needs and their
carers, op. cit., p. 4.
-
ibid.
-
|
Date of Birth
|
Females qualify for age pension at
|
|
1 July 1935 to 31 December 1936
|
60.5
|
|
1 January 1937 to 30 June 1938
|
61
|
|
1 July 1938 to 31 December 1939
|
61.5
|
|
1 January 1940 to 30 June 1941
|
62
|
|
1 July 1941 to 31 December 1942
|
62.5
|
|
1 January 1943 to 30 June 1944
|
63
|
|
1 July 1944 to 31 December 1945
|
63.5
|
|
1 January 1946 to 30 June 1947
|
64
|
|
1 July 1947 to 31 December 1948
|
64.5
|
|
1 January 1949 and later
|
65
|
-
|
Date of Birth
|
Females qualify for service pension at
|
|
1 July 1943 to 31 December 1944
|
56.5
|
|
1 January 1945 to 30 June 1946
|
57
|
|
1 July 1946 to 31 December 1947
|
57.5
|
|
1 January 1948 to 30 June 1949
|
58
|
|
1 July 1949 to 31 December 1950
|
58.5
|
|
1 January 1951 to 30 June 1952
|
59
|
|
1 July 1952 to 31 December 1953
|
59.5
|
|
1 January 1954 and later
|
60
|
-
Self-funded retires referred to in this Digest are those of
retired age (that is aged 55 or more) but not on a government
income support payment due to income or assets.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP,
Recognising senior Australians their needs and their
carers, op. cit., pp. 4-5.
-
ibid.
-
ibid.
-
Senator the Hon. Amanda Vanstone (Minister for Family and
Community Services), Further assistance for older
Australians, media release, Parliament House, Canberra, 29
July 2001.
-
Senator the Hon. Kaye Patterson (Minister for Family and
Community Services),
Labor states and territories snub self-funded retirees,
media release, Parliament House, Canberra, 28 July 2004.
-
ibid.
-
Peter Yeend, 1998 Budget Measures Legislation Amendment (Social
Security and Veterans' Entitlements) Bill 1998, Bills
Digest No. 21 1998-99, Department of Parliamentary
Library, 1998-99.
-
Nathan Hancock and Dale Daniels, Family and Community Services
and Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Further Assistance for
Older Australians) Bill 2001,
Bills Digest No. 18 2001-02, Department of Parliamentary
Library, 2001-02.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP,
Recognising senior Australians their needs and their
carers, op. cit., p. 6.
-
ibid.
-
Sub-section 198(2) of the Social Security Act 1991.
-
The Hon. Mr John Howard, MP,
Extra Assistance for Families, Liberal Party of Australia, 2004
election policy platform, p. 4.
-
ibid.
-
ibid.
-
Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS),
Family Characteristics Australia, Catalogue No. 4442.0, 22
September 2004, p. 40.
-
ibid.
-
T he Hon. Mr John Howard, MP,
Saluting their service, Liberal Party of Australia, 2004
election policy platform, 4 October 2004, p. 5.
-
ibid.
-
Veterans Entitlements Act 1986, section 23, Intermediate
rate of pension.
-
Veterans Entitlements Act 1986, section 24, Special
rate of pension.
-
Veterans Entitlements Act 1986, section 22, Extreme
Disablement Adjustment.
-
Veterans Entitlements Act 1986, section 27, Temporary
payment at special rate.
-
Veterans Entitlements Act 1986, section 27, Increased
rates of pension in certain circumstances.
Peter Yeend
1 December 2004
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared to support the work of the
Australian Parliament using information available at the time of
production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position
of the Information and Research Service, nor do they constitute
professional legal opinion.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2004
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2004.
Back to top