Bills Digest No. 160 2003-04
Farm Household
Support Amendment Bill 2004
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
-
extend the closing date for applications for Farm Help income
support from 30 June 2004 to 30 June 2007 and the deadline for Farm
Help income support payments from 30 June 2005 to 30 June 2008 with
provision for future extensions of the program to be made by
regulation, and
-
reflect the changed focus of the Farm Help program from
providing welfare support to facilitating adjustment by:
-
requiring applicants for income support or re-establishment
grants to obtain professional financial advice and prepare an
activity plan before they are eligible to receive either income
support payments or re-establishment grants, unless they are in
conditions of great hardship and unable to meet their living
expenses
-
removing the provision allowing farmers to suspend their Farm
Help income support in order to access the exceptional
circumstances relief payment and then return to Farm Help income
support
-
ensuring recipients are making effective use of the program by
fulfilling all their obligations under the activity plans, and
-
enabling reviews to be conducted of re-establishment grant
recipients and their partners to determine that they have not
returned to farming within five years of receiving a
re-establishment grant.
Farm Help is the successor program to the Farm Family Restart
Scheme which commenced in 1997 as part of the Government s
integrated rural policy package entitled Agriculture Advancing
Australia (AAA). Farm Help is available to farmers who are
experiencing severe financial difficulty and cannot borrow further
against their assets. It provides a safety net for those farmers
who need to reassess their options and perhaps find a new future
outside farming.
The key features of the Farm Help program are:
-
fortnightly support paid at the same rate as Newstart Allowance
for up to twelve months. Income support is subject to income and
non-farm assets tests
-
up to $5500 to obtain compulsory professional advice on the
future financial viability of the farming business and on
employment opportunities should the family choose to leave farming.
This grant may also be used to complete skills training for an
alternative career and to obtain appropriate computer software
-
a compulsory activity plan based on the initial financial
viability assessment and goals identified by the farmer. All
farmers on the program, regardless of their viability assessment,
must have an activity plan and act in accordance with it while they
are receiving Farm Help income support
-
case management provided by a Centrelink Farm Help contact
officer, to provide advice on the options available to the farmer,
and
-
a re-establishment grant of up to $45 000 on the sale of
the farm. The grant is subject to an assets test. Any income
support received while on Farm Help is deducted from the amount of
the grant.
Currently the closing date for Farm Help applications is 30 June
2004. Since income support may be paid for a period of 12 months,
the closing date for Farm Help income support payments is 30 June
2005. This Bill extends the program to 30 June 2008 with
applications for income support and re-establishment grants closing
on 30 June 2007. The Bill also allows for further extension of the
closing dates to be made by regulation. The Minister for
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, Hon Warren Truss, made it
clear in his second reading speech that any further extensions to
the Farm Help program beyond June 2009 will be made by
regulation.(1) The Minister also foreshadowed an
amendment to the re-establishment grant disallowable instrument to
increase the grant to $50 000.
In 2003 the Government extended the program by seven months to
30 June 2004.(2) The Minister said at the time that the
reason for the extension of the program was to facilitate
transition to any new arrangements that might be considered in the
context of the 2004 Budget.(3) The Government has
allocated $134.9 million in the 2004-05 Budget to continue the Farm
Help program over the next four years. On 11 May 2004 the Minister
said that the Government will review the program in 2005-06 and
that its future beyond 2007 will be considered in the context of
the 2006-07 Budget.(4)
To be eligible for Farm Help a person must:
-
be a farmer, and have been so for a continuous period of at
least two years immediately before applying for the program
-
-
be an Australian resident living in Australia
-
hold a certificate of inability to obtain finance from their
primary financial institution, and
-
not be involved in bankruptcy proceedings or have been
issued with an eviction order or in any other way have lost control
of the management of the farm.
The Minister said in his second reading speech that since the
Farm Help program commenced on 1 December 1997, and up to 30 April
2004, over 8600 farmers had received Farm Help income support and
over 1000 farmers had received re-establishment
assistance.(5) A review of the Farm Help program carried
out by the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) in 2002 reported
that the number of farmers participating in the program has been
below the levels anticipated by the Government when budget
allocations were made for the program. Figures in the ANAO s report
show that in 2001-02 the number of people receiving income support
was over-estimated by 30 per cent, the number receiving
professional advice by 21 per cent, and the number receiving a
re-establishment grant by 11 per cent.(6) In the 2003-04
financial year the original budget allocation for the Farm Help
program was $24.875 million. The actual expenditure was $15.602
million.(7) Staff of AFFA explained at Senate Estimates
hearings on 25 May 2004 that:
The figure for uptake of Farm Help is often
quite difficult to estimate accurately. Over the last couple of
years there has been a level of interaction with other programs.
Our expectation was that, in the 2003-04 budget, it would be up
around the $24 million mark. What we did see was a sharp drop
in the last couple of months of 2002-03 and a continuing decline
throughout 2003-04 in the number of people on income support across
Farm Help. There are a couple of reasons. In particular, I guess we
expected that there would be some increased uptake of Farm Help at
the conclusion of the sugar package. The various drought
initiatives probably impacted on that sort of uptake as
well.(8)
The average number of farmers receiving income support in
2003-04 was about 700 each month.(9) According to
information provided in May 2004 to the Senate Estimates committee,
AFFA is budgeting for a doubling in the number of people applying
for Farm Help in 2004-05.(10) The increased numbers are
based on an expectation that some farmers now receiving exceptional
circumstances assistance will choose to access the Farm Help
program once exceptional circumstances declarations
expire.(11)
Farm Help is administered by AFFA and Centrelink under the terms
of a memorandum of understanding between the two government
agencies. While AFFA is responsible for creating promotional
materials for the Farm Help program, Centrelink distributes the
materials and conducts local promotional activities. The ANAO
considered the effectiveness of the promotion of the Farm Help
program.(12) A survey carried out by AFFA in 2002 found
that overall awareness among farmers of the Farm Help program was
37 per cent, up from 21 per cent in 2001. AFFA s goal was reported
as having 50 per cent of all primary producers aware of Farm Help
by June 2004.(13)
The ANAO report showed that awareness of Farm Help varied
considerably between primary industry sectors. It was highest
amongst sugar cane growers and dairy farmers, that is, in sectors
that have been the recipients of recent Government adjustment
packages. According the ANAO report, awareness of Farm Help tended
to be lower for primary producers who report making a loss, than
for those reporting to break even or make a profit (32 per cent and
39 per cent awareness respectively). The ANAO commented that:
The lower level of awareness amongst loss-making
primary producers presents a challenge to AFFA, since potential
users of Farm Help are more likely to come from loss making
enterprises. Some means of increasing awareness by loss-makers
warrants consideration in the further development of AFFA s
promotion strategy.(14)
Item 1 extends the closing date for Farm Help
income support applications to 30 June 2007 or to a later date as
prescribed in regulations. Income support may be paid for 12
months. Item 2 extends the closing date for
payment of Farm Help income support to 30 June 2008 or to a later
date prescribed in regulations.
Items 1-6 of Schedule 2 add
and amend definitions used in the Farm Household Support Act
1992 (the Act) and are made necessary by changes proposed by
this Bill. The definition of sale of a farm is repealed by
item 4 and replaced in item 5 by
another definition to ensure that a person selling their farm and
claiming the re-establishment grant has not just transferred their
right or interest in the farm enterprise to their partner.
Item 7 inserts a proposed section
5 which enables farmers who are in severe financial
hardship when they make an application for Farm Help income support
to be paid the income support before they have fulfilled all the
qualifications for the program. (Item 13 gives the
Secretary the discretion to waive the requirements. This
responsibility can be delegated by the Secretary to Centrelink.)
This change is made necessary by other amendments to the Act that
make it necessary for applicants to have first obtained advice on
their financial outlook and drawn up an activity plan before they
can access income support (item 9 makes these
changes). Severe financial hardship is defined in proposed
section 5 as a situation where the liquid assets of the
farmer and their partner (excluding farm assets) are not greater
than the total amount of the Newstart Allowance that would have
been paid in the preceding six weeks, if the person were entitled
to Newstart Allowance and had no other income. (i.e. about $1200
for a single person or $2100 for a couple).(15)
The purpose of item 8 is to clarify the object
of the Act and to make a clear distinction between Farm Help income
support and the exceptional circumstances relief payment. According
to the Explanatory Memorandum(16) the Courts have
considered that the objectives of the two programs are the same and
that Farm Help had a welfare orientation. The proposed amendment
makes it plain that this is not the case. The object of the Farm
Help program as stated in proposed subsection 6(2)
is to promote change by farmers in financial difficulties. This is
to be done by providing eligible farmers with twelve month s
financial assistance while they take actions to improve their
longer term financial situation, either by improving the financial
performance of their farm business, finding alternative sources of
income, or selling the farm and re-establishing themselves outside
farming.
Item 9 amends the qualifications for Farm Help
income support. Proposed subparagraph 8B(1)(d)(i)
removes the requirement for a farmer to obtain a certificate of
inability to obtain finance from a bank and replaces it with a
requirement for a farmer to obtain advice on their financial
outlook from a prescribed adviser . Details of who will be a
prescribed adviser will be included in regulations. The Minister
said that the removal of the requirement for a certificate of
inability to obtain finance addresses concerns by banks and their
clients that obtaining the certificate might jeopardise a person s
future borrowing arrangements.(17) Proposed
paragraph 8B(1)(e) also makes it a requirement for a
person applying for Farm Help income support to obtain advice from
a prescribed adviser on whether there is a reasonable likelihood of
improving the financial performance of the farm enterprise.
At present farmers receiving income support are required to
develop an activity plan and act in accordance with it. The purpose
of the activity plan is to assist farmers gain skills and
information that will help them take decisions about their future
and implement changes. Proposed paragraph 8B(1)(f)
requires farmers to draw up an activity plan before they receive
income support payments or a re-establishment grant. The new
requirements in proposed paragraphs 8B(1)(d),
(e) and (f) can be deferred in
cases of severe financial hardship (proposed section
5 refers).
The effect of item 10 is to end the opportunity
for a person or their partner to suspend their Farm Help income
support in order to access exceptional circumstances relief
payments, and then rejoin the Farm Help program when the other
package ceases. According to the Explanatory Memorandum this
provision has been introduced to focus farm families attention on
implementing their activity plans and improving their longer term
financial security.(18) Proposed section
50 allows for a payment of Farm Help income support to be
terminated if a person or their partner is receiving an exceptional
circumstances relief payment. This removes the possibility of a
person or a couple receiving Farm Help income support and
exceptional circumstances relief payment at the same time. A person
or their partner will still be able to apply for exceptional
circumstances relief payment after they have completed the Farm
Help program, assuming that they have decided not to sell their
farm.
Proposed section 51 provides for automatic
termination of Farm Help income support payments if a person who
has had some of the application requirements waived because of
their circumstances of extreme hardship, then fails to obtain
advice on their financial outlook or draw up an activity plan
within three months. Proposed section 52 enables
the Secretary to terminate an income support payment if a person
fails to comply with an activity plan that they have drawn up.
Item 17 gives the Commonwealth authorisation to
recover the amount of a re-establishment grant if a person who has
received such a grant or their partner returns to farming within
five years after receiving the grant. This provision is in the
Re-establishment grant regulations and is being transferred to the
Act.
The Minister has foreshadowed that the disallowable instruments
made under the Act will be amended to implement the changes to the
program. The Farm Help Advice Scheme 1997 instrument is to be
amended to specify the operational details of the Farm Help advice
and training grant. The Farm Help Re-establishment Grant Scheme
1997 instrument is to be amended to extend the closing date for
applications for the re-establishment grant to 30 June 2007 and to
increase the maximum re-establishment grant to $50 000. A
regulation will also be made to define who can provide financial
assessments under the program. These disallowable instruments
cannot take legal effect until the relevant amendments in the Act
are in force.(19)
The amendments to the Act seem designed to promote earlier
decision making by farmers in difficult financial circumstances and
to encourage low-income farmers to make changes designed to return
their farming enterprise to profit, to seek sources of income
outside the farm, or to sell up and leave farming. Farmers with
access to other agricultural support packages, such as exceptional
circumstances relief payments or the sugar industry reform program
2004, are unlikely to choose Farm Help. The re-establishment
assistance under the sugar package allows farmers to access grants
of up to $100 000 double what is available under the Farm Help
program.(20) As well, there are a range of other
elements of the sugar industry reform program that will be more
attractive to canefarmers than the assistance offered under the
Farm Help program.
-
Hon Warren Truss, Second reading speech, Farm Household Support
Amendment Bill 2004 , House of Representatives, Debates,
27 May 2004, p. 29133.
-
Farm Household Support Amendment Act 2003.
-
Hon Warren Truss, Second reading speech, Farm Household Support
Amendment Bill 2003 , House of Representatives, Debates,
17 September 2003, p. 19500.
-
Hon Warren Truss, New focus for Farm Help , Media
release DAFF04/114WT, 11 May 2004.
-
Hon Warren Truss, Second reading speech, Farm Household Support
Amendment Bill 2004 , House of Representatives, Debates,
27 May 2004, p. 29133.
-
Australian National Audit Office, Administration of Three
Key Components of the Agriculture Advancing Australia
(AAA) Package, Canberra, 2003, p. 58.
-
Portfolio Budget Statements 2003-04 , Agriculture, Fisheries and
Forestry portfolio, Budg`et related paper No. 1.1, p. 21;
and Portfolio Budget Statements 2004-05 , Agriculture, Fisheries
and Forestry portfolio, Budget related paper No. 1.1, p.
27.
-
Senate, Rural and Regional and Transport Legislation Committee,
Budget Estimates , Hearings, 25 May 2004, p. 35.
-
ibid., p. 37.
-
ibid., p. 37.
-
An employee of AFFA told the Senate Estimates Committee on 25
May 2004 that I think an approximate figure for the number of
people on exceptional circumstances is probably 10,000 If we
expected, say, 10 per cent of those people to transfer to Farm Help
then we would see quite a significant increase.
-
Australian National Audit Office, Administration of Three
Key Components of the Agriculture Advancing Australia
(AAA) Package, pp. 64 5.
-
ibid., p. 65.
-
ibid., p. 65.
-
The current basic rates of Newstart Allowance are, for a single
person with no children $389.20 a fortnight, single with dependent
children $421.00 a fortnight, or for partners $351.10 each per
fortnight.
-
Explanatory memorandum, Farm Household Support Amendment Bill
2004, p. 6.
-
Hon Warren Truss, Second reading speech, Farm Household Support
Amendment Bill 2004 , House of Representatives, Debates,
27 May 2004, p. 29132.
-
Explanatory memorandum, op. cit., p. 7.
-
Hon Warren Truss, Second reading speech, Farm Household Support
Amendment Bill 2004 , House of Representatives, Debates, 3
June 2004, p. 29641.
-
See Sugar Industry Reform Program 2004 (SIRP) at:
http://www.affa.gov.au/content/output.cfm?ObjectID=3662DAEF-3235-4FA8-86F13B5961C60A12
Rosemary Bell
16 June 2004
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2004
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2004.
Back to top