Bills Digest No. 144 2003-04
Electoral and Referendum Amendment
(Access to Electoral Roll and other Measures) Bill
2004
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Electoral and Referendum Amendment
(Access to Electoral Roll and other Measures) Bill
2004
Date Introduced:
1 April 2004
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Special Minister of State
Commencement:
The Act commences on the
day that it receives Royal Assent. The provisions in schedule 1
that is, the amendment provisions of the Act, commence on the
28th day after the Act receives Royal
Assent
The Bill amends
the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Electoral Act)
and the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 (the
Referendum Act). Many of the amendments are technical and many are
directed at eliminating discrepancies between the Electoral Act and
the Referendum Act. The purposes and origins of the more
substantive provisions are discussed under the Background section
below.
The Bill provides for new sections in the
Electoral Act and Referendum Act to expressly enable scrutineers to
be present at pre-poll voting offices. The amendment comes in
response to the recommendation 16 of the Joint Standing Committee
on Electoral Matters (JSCEM) report on the 2001 election. The
Committee noted, in making that recommendation:
The Electoral Act is silent on the attendance of
scrutineers at pre-poll voting centres. The AEC noted that the
Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 allows for
scrutineers to be present at pre-poll voting centres, as
scrutineers are allowed at each place in Australia where voting is
being conducted . The AEC recommended that a similar provision be
included in the Electoral Act.
The Committee considers that openness and
transparency are key factors in ensuring high levels of electoral
integrity, fairness and public confidence. Measures such as opening
the pre-poll voting centres to correctly appointed scrutineers
would increase openness and transparency.(1)
It is made an offence punishable by up to six
months imprisonment for a scrutineer to communicate with another
person at a pre-poll voting office where that communication is not
reasonably necessary for the discharge of the scrutineer s duty.
These provisions are similar in effect to the existing provisions
in s. 217 and 218 of the Electoral Act that make it an offence to
influence or attempt to influence any elector within a polling
booth.
There is currently a regime in place for the
use of electoral roll information by prescribed authorities . The
relevant provisions appear in the Electoral and Referendum
Regulations 1940. The regulations have effect only until 24
June 2005. The current Bill preserves those regulations, but also
provides express power in the Act itself for the provision of such
information.
The Bill clears the way for the Australian
Electoral Commission (AEC) to establish an electronic database
available via the internet as provided for in a recommendation of
the JSCEM that was consistent with submissions by the
AEC.(2) This is achieved by allowing the AEC to
determine the form in which roll information is to be provided.
The amendments also restructure the provisions
that relate to supply of roll information. Members and Senators
will be entitled, under the provisions, to three printed copies of
the roll rather than the five required to be provided under the
current provision.
The Bill introduces a provision to prohibit
the sale of the electoral roll in any format. This comes about as a
result of a recommendation of the JSCEM, concurring with the view
of the AEC.(3) The JSCEM was concerned that information
on purchased copies of the roll could easily be used for commercial
purposes.
The Electoral Act currently provides for a
penalty of 100 penalty units (a penalty unit is currently $110) for
the wrongful use of roll information.(4) The current
provision is limited to the provision of information by tape or
disk. The Bill repeals the current provision and substitutes for it
a provision that refers simply to information, and hence covers
information supplied by any means.
The Bill proposes to introduce an express
provision requiring the AEC to provide reasons in relation to its
decisions relating to registration of party names. The provision
originates with a JSCEM recommendation based on this reasoning:
While the AEC is obliged under subsection 141(7)
of the Electoral Act to give relevant persons associated with the
reviewable decision written notice of that decision, the Committee
considers that the AEC has a wide discretion in the level of detail
it is required to provide in the notice. The Committee believes
that the provision of detailed reasons, with reference to the
Electoral Act, should be mandatory. Those reasons should be
published to assist the understanding of the application of the
relevant provisions.(5)
The Electoral Act currently prohibits a number
of activities at an entrance or within a polling booth or within
six metres of a polling booth or polling booth entrance. Those
activities are:
(a) canvassing for votes
(b) soliciting the vote of any elector
(c) inducing any elector not to vote for any
particular candidate
(d) inducing any elector not to vote at the
election, or
(e) exhibiting any notice or sign (other than
an official notice) relating to the election.(6)
The Bill proposes to add to that prohibition,
the circumstance where a person engages in any of those activities
more than six metres from polling booths but by means of various
specified public address systems, radio equipment , or a device for
broadcasting and the activity is audible within the polling booth
or within six meters from the polling booth. The provision emanates
from recommendation 22 of the JSCEM s report on the 2001 election.
That recommendation was not in the terms of that contained in the
Bill, rather it was:
that subject to advice from the AEC, section 340
of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 be amended so as to prohibit
the broadcast of political material which is clearly audible within
the six metres surrounding a polling place on election
day.(7)
There are potential problems with the proposed
provision. One problem arises because of the inclusion of radio
equipment or broadcasting devices in the provision. If a radio
station broadcasts a political advertisement on the day of the
election, and a person has a radio turned on inside or within
earshot of a polling booth, does the radio station breach the
section? A presently drafted, it seems so. The person authorising
the advertisement and perhaps the radio station itself would be
technically liable to the penalty provided for under the provision
(5 penalty units). Whether that goes beyond the intention of the
provision is a matter for consideration.
Another potential problem, as raised by the
JSCEM when making the relevant recommendation, is that care needs
to be taken to ensure that any proposed provision is consistent
with the constitutional principles of freedom of political
communication. The freedom of political communication extends to
any non-verbal actions which are intended and are capable of
expressing ideas about government and the policies/politics of the
Commonwealth or the States. At first sight, the proposed
restriction on the broadcast of the political material specified
would infringe the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of
communication. But the restriction might be allowable if:
The JSCEM referred to legal advice
obtained by the AEC, to the effect that, in order to comply with
those principles, the provision would need to:
-
be limited to a defined time period (say 8am to 6pm on polling
day);
-
be confined to prescribed places (polling places);
-
define the limit to which the electioneering activity may extend
beyond the six metre boundary around the polling place; and
-
consider the scope of the power of authorised officers to
regulate this sort of activity beyond pre-existing definitions of
polling booths and polling places.(8)
The Bill does not address all of those
matters. The resolution of the question of the constitutional
validity of this provision is beyond the scope of this Digest, but
the Parliament may require reassurance that the issues going to the
question have been adequately addressed.
The Electoral Act and Referendum Act provide
for applications by candidates or the AEC to the Federal Court for
injunctions restraining conduct in breach of the Act, or compelling
conduct required under the Act. Currently, the Acts provide that an
appeal lies from decisions of the Federal Court in such matters, to
the High Court. The Bill proposes to remove the existing right of
appeal to the High Court, by way of right (meaning, without the
need to first apply to the High Court for special leave to appeal)
in relation to judgments of the Federal Court granting or refusing
to grant injunctions.
The Explanatory Memorandum asserts that the
existing provisions conflict with section 33 of the Federal
Court Act 1976 which, the memorandum says, states that appeal
should be by way of special leave . To say that the provisions
conflict , with respect, overstates the position. Section 33 of the
Federal Court Act provides simply that an appeal requires special
leave except as otherwise provided by another Act. Hence
section 33 allows for, and contemplates that other Acts might
provide for an appeal without leave. Whether that leave should be
required is a question of policy. To add a requirement for special
leave effectively places another obstacle in the way of access to
the High Court. Such leave is granted only where there is some
special reason that warrants intervention by the High Court. The
Parliament may wish to consider whether appeals by candidates or
the AEC against decisions relating to injunctions under the
Electoral or Referendum Act warrant speedy and unimpeded access to
the High Court.
Schedule 1, items 1 and
20
These items amend the Electoral Act to allow
for the presence of scrutineers at pre-poll voting offices and to
provide for a penalty (similar to that provided under s. 218(1) of
the Electoral Act) for making unofficial communications (for
instance, attempting to influence an elector).
Schedule 1, items 2, 5, and
6
These items amend the Electoral Act to permit
the use of roll information by prescribed authorities for
prescribed purposes.
Schedule 1, items 3, 7, 9, 13, 112 and
114
These items amend the Electoral Act so as to
restructure the provisions that relate to supply of roll
information.
Schedule 1, items 4, 8, 113 and
115
These items amend the Electoral Act to extend
the prohibition on inappropriate use of roll information to cover
information supplied by any means.
Schedule 1, items 14, 15 and
16
These items amend the Electoral Act to require
the AEC to publish reasons for decisions to refuse to register
party names.
Schedule 1, items 27, 28 and
29
These items amend the Electoral Act to
prohibit the broadcasting of electoral material audible within six
metres of a polling booth.
Schedule 1, item 30
This item amends the Electoral Act by removing
the appeal from the Federal Court s decisions on injunctions to the
High Court as of right.(if any)
Schedule 1, items 33 and
37
These items amend the Referendum Act to allow
for the presence of scrutineers at pre-poll voting offices and to
provide for a penalty (similar to that provided under s. 218(1) of
the Electoral Act) for making unofficial communications (for
instance, attempting to influence an elector).
Schedule 1, items 40 and
41
These items amend the Referendum Act to
prohibit the broadcasting of electoral material audible within six
metres of a polling booth.
Schedule 1, item 42
This item amends the Referendum Act by
removing the appeal from the Federal Court s decisions on
injunctions to the High Court as of right.
The Bill contains a large number of technical
amendments that are unlikely to be controversial. Parliament may
wish to consider the issues raised herein regarding the proposal to
prohibit the broadcasting of electoral material audible within six
metres of a polling booth and the proposed provision removing the
appeal to the High Court as of right, in respect of decisions of
the Federal Court on injunctions.
-
Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters, Report of the
inquiry into the conduct of the 2001 Federal Election and matters
relating thereto, Canberra, June 2003, pp. 158 9.
-
ibid., recommendations 27 and 28, pp. 26 27.
-
ibid., recommendation 29 and commentary, pp. 227 8.
-
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, section 91A.
-
The 2001 Federal Election, op. cit., p. 117.
-
Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, section 340(1).
-
The 2001 Federal Election, op. cit., p. 193.
-
ibid., p. 192.
Jerome Davidson
25 May 2004
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2004
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Parliamentary Library, 2004.
Back to top