Bills Digest No. 102 2002-03
Corporations Legislation Amendment Bill
2002
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Corporations Legislation Amendment
Bill 2002
Corporations (Review Fees)
Bill 2002
Date Introduced:
12 December 2002
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Treasury
Commencement:
The majority of the
provisions in these bills commence on 1 July 2003. One provision in
Schedule 4 and the provisions in Schedule 5 commence on dates that
are as set out in the Schedule.
Purpose
The purpose of
these bills is to amend the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) to give
effect to the proposals contained within the Corporate Law Economic
Reform Program (CLERP) consultation paper, CLERP 7 Simplified
Lodgments and Compliance (CLERP 7)(1) and to
clarify the law relating to charges over uncertificated
securities.
These bills are part
of a package of three Bills which implement the Government s
response to CLERP 7. The other Bill in the package is the
Corporations (Fees) Amendment Bill 2002.
In February 2000, the then Minister for
Financial Services and Regulation, the Hon Joe Hockey MP, announced
the release of CLERP 7.
The CLERP 7 consultation paper discussed five
areas for reform:
-
- Abolition of company annual returns
-
- Streamlining document lodgment requirements under the
Corporations Act
-
- Establishment of a business advisory board
-
- Use of ABN s (Australian Business Numbers) and the ABR
(Australian Business Register), and
-
- Corporations Law Fees.
In September 2001, in a joint press release
between Mr Hockey and the then Minister for Small Business, Mr Ian
McFarlane(2), the Ministers announced that the proposals
that were contained within the CLERP 7 paper would be
implemented.(3)
Mr McFarlane was reported as saying that the
Government was committed to reducing the paperwork burden on small
business and boosting the sectors take up of
e-commerce.(4) This would be achieved through CLERP 7
implementation. In addition, it was noted that significant cost
savings to business would flow through the implementation of CLERP
7.(5)
The explanatory memorandum to the Bill
reinforces the point that many of the CLERP 7 proposals are
designed to improve the efficiency of corporate regulation by
simplifying document lodgement and compliance procedures for
companies under the Act.(6)
The Bill also gives effect to recommendations
made by the Companies and Securities Advisory Committee in the
Report to the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation on
Charges over uncertificated securities, which suggested
that:
charges over uncertificated securities be exempt
from the charges registration provisions of the Corporations
Law.(7)
Main Provisions
The Act currently contains a number of
provisions requiring companies and managed investment schemes lodge
information with Australian Securities and Investments Commission
(ASIC) regarding characteristics of the entity.
Currently section 345 of the Act requires that a
company lodge an annual return with ASIC by the 31 January each
year. An annual return may be lodged either in writing or
electronically.(8)
The Act sets out the information that a company
needs to include in its annual return.(9) In summary,
the law states that the following details should be included in a
company s annual return;
-
- company name
-
- address of registered office,
-
- address of principal place of business,
-
- information regarding directors and company secretaries,
-
- information regarding issued shares and options granted over
unissued shares,
-
- information regarding company members,
-
- information regarding solvency,
-
- information regarding the ultimate holding company, and
-
- the Australian Company Number (ACN).
Section 345 of the Act also states that the
responsible entity of a registered scheme (that is, a managed
investment scheme), must lodge an annual return for the scheme
within 3 months of the end of the schemes financial year. The Act
also sets out the information that the responsible entity needs to
include in the return.
Generally speaking, proprietary companies are
required to pay $200 to lodge an annual return and public companies
are required to pay $900. These fees are payable when the annual
return is lodged.(10)
Failure to lodge an annual return is an offence
with a maximum penalty being five penalty units
($550).(11)
Historically, the annual return was required to
contain financial information. For most companies, the information
to be provided was key financial data which contained a summary of
assets, liabilities and operating profits/losses.(12)
The requirement to lodge key financial data was removed pursuant to
the policy contained within the First Corporate Law
Simplification Act 1995 and its amending regulations.
It has been suggested that
the purpose of the annual return is no longer
(if it ever was) to inform creditors and the public of the state of
the financial affairs of the company. Financial disclosure is
mandated by the provisions of the Corporations Act dealing with
financial statements, their distribution to members and their
lodgment with ASIC. It appears that the purpose of the annual
return is to provide some public reassurance that the company is
still in operation and is solvent.(13)
The Corporations Law was subsequently amended in
1998 to include the requirement that directors of a company who
have not lodged financial statements under Part 2M of the Act, must
pass a solvency resolution in the month preceding the date when the
company annual return is required to be lodged.
Public companies and proprietary companies are
required to lodge financial statements under Part 2M of the Act.
Normally small proprietary companies do not lodge financial reports
under Part 2M and therefore they will be required to pass a
solvency resolution.
Currently, failure to pass a solvency resolution
constitutes an offence with a maximum penalty of five penalty units
($550).
Currently the law also requires that a company
must notify ASIC if there is a change to;
-
- the registered office of the company,(14)
-
- principal place of business of the company,(15)
-
- company officers and their particulars (including
appointments/cessations, changes to officers name or
address).(16)
A company has fourteen days from the date on
which these change have occurred to notify ASIC of the change.
Failure to notify ASIC of these changes is a criminal offence.
The Bill proposes to remove the requirement to
lodge an annual return by repealing Part 2N.1 of
the Act which contains the requirement to lodge annual returns.
The Bill also proposes to insert new provisions
(Parts 2N.1-5) requiring companies and registered
schemes respond to the following documents issued by ASIC;
-
- an extract of particulars
-
- a return of particulars, and
increasing companies ongoing reporting
requirements to ASIC.
In summary, under the Bill, ASIC will on an
annual basis give each company and responsible entity of a
registered scheme, an extract of particulars . The entity receiving
the extract of particulars will be required to verify that the
contents of the extract are correct and pay ASIC an annual review
fee .
Clause 346A states that ASIC
must on an annual basis, give each company and registered scheme a
copy of their extract of particulars.
Item 2 defines an extract of
particulars as a statement provided by ASIC that contains
-
- details of the particulars of the company or registered scheme
as required to be kept in the registers under sub-section 1274(1),
and
-
- addition information required to be provided to ASIC as
prescribed by the regulations (proposed clause
346B).
Sub-section 1274(1) of the Act states that;
ASIC must, subject to this Act, keep such
registers as it considers necessary in such form as it thinks
fit.
In section 9 of the Act, register is defined to
mean a register under this Act .
The Act does not set out what particulars of the
company or registered scheme are kept in the 1274(1) registers.
Therefore, it is not clear what information ASIC may include and
ask an entity to verify in an extract of particulars.
The extract of particular is required to be
given to the entity within two weeks of the review date .
Clause 345A defines review date for companies and
registered schemes as being the anniversary of the entity s
registration or a date chosen and agreed upon between ASIC and the
entity.
Clause 346C states that a
company or registered scheme must notify ASIC if any part of the
extract of particulars is incorrect, or provide ASIC with specific
information if they have been asked a specific detail under
proposed clause 346B. This response is required to
be made within 28 days after the issue of the extract of
particulars.
Failure to notify ASIC if any part of the
extract of particulars is incorrect or respond to a request from
ASIC for particular information is an offence. The maximum penalty
is five penalty units ($550).
In addition to this, each company and registered
scheme will be required to pay an annual review fee to ASIC payable
no later than two months after the review date (clause
1351).
The arrangements relating to review fees is
contained within the Corporations (Review Fees) Bill
2002.(17) Proposed section 5 of this
bill provides that regulations may be made which will prescribe
review fees.
As noted above, the Act currently imposes a
requirement on company directors to pass a solvency resolution the
details of which are included in the company annual return. The
current requirement is repealed by item 30 of the
bill and is replaced by the proposed Part
2N.3.
Normally small proprietary companies do not
lodge financial reports under Part 2M and therefore they will be
required to pass a solvency resolution(18).
In summary, under this part, if a company has
not lodged a financial report(19) with ASIC under Part
2M within the twelve month period preceding the review date, the
directors of the company will be required to pass a solvency
resolution (as defined in item 8) within two
months after the review date.
Failure to pass a solvency resolution in these
circumstances is an offence.
In many senses, these provisions reproduce the
current requirements under the Act. The following new provisions
have also been included which require a company to advise ASIC
if;
-
- they pass a resolution that they do not consider that the
company will be able to pay its debts (a negative solvency
resolution as defined in item 3), or
-
- they have not passed a solvency resolution within two months of
the review date (clause 347B).
Failure to notify ASIC in these circumstances is
an offence under the Act with a maximum penalty of ten penalty
units ($1100).
Proposed section 347C has also
been included in the Bill. It deems a company director to have
represented to ASIC that they consider there are reasonable grounds
to believe that the company will be able to pay its debts if the
following conditions have been met;
-
- it has not lodged a Chapter 2M solvency resolution, and
-
- it has not passed a positive solvency resolution, and
-
- it has not notified ASIC that they have failed to pass a
solvency resolution,
It is not clear that this provision adds any
value to the operation of the solvency resolution requirements
contained within the proposed Bill.
Under the Bill, ASIC will be able to instigate
an inquiry with the company or registered scheme to ensure that the
regulators records are up to date. It is proposed that ASIC will be
able to issue a return of particulars (as defined in item
5) to a company or registered scheme if;
-
- the entity has not paid its review fee,
-
- ASIC suspects that the details in its register are incorrect,
or
-
- ASIC has not received any documentation regarding the company
for at least a year (clause 348D).
In a return of particulars, ASIC may ask the
company or registered scheme for;
-
- confirmation of particulars in relation to the company or
scheme that are recorded in the register under subsection 1274(1)
(clause 348D and item 5),
-
- other details regarding the company as prescribed by
regulations (proposed clause 348B),
-
- that the entity pass a solvency resolution or provide it with
details regarding a solvency resolution that has already been
passed (proposed clause 348C).
As noted above, it is not entirely clear on the
face of the legislation what particulars in relation to the company
or scheme that are recorded in the register under subsection
1274(1) means. Consequently it is not clear what information ASIC
may ask a company or registered scheme to provide to them under
this section.
Other notification requirements
The Bill also amends those parts of the Act that
relate to the information to be included when a company applies for
registration and the information that needs to be included on the
Register of Members.
Section 117 of the Act states that to register a
company, a person must lodge an application with ASIC. The section
sets out what must be contained within an application.
Items 15-17 amend section 117 of the Act to
include a number of additional pieces of information that need to
be included in an application for registration, namely
-
- Whether or not shares held by a member will be fully paid on
registration,
-
- Whether or not the shares will be beneficially or
non-beneficially owned by the member on registration, and
-
- Whether, on registration, the company will have an ultimate
holding company.
These additional requirements increase the
information that ASIC is initially provided with by a company
seeking to be registered under the Act.
Item 20 amends section 169 of
the Act to provide that the Register of Members is required to
include information regarding;
-
- the amount paid on the shares, and
-
- whether or not the shares are fully paid.
These amendments ensure that the Register of
Members provides more information regarding holding of company
shares.
The ongoing reporting requirements currently
contained within the Act (noted above) continue. The Bill does
however amend the Corporations Act to impose a number of additional
reporting requirements on proprietary companies so that;
-
- where a company makes changes to a proprietary company and
amends its Register of Members so that certain parts of the
Register (including names and address of top 20 members, details of
shareholdings by members as well as changes to share structure) is
different to the information contained within the latest extract of
particulars, the company will be required to notify ASIC of those
changes (Item 18),
-
- where a proprietary company amends parts of its Register of
Members (including names and addresses of top 20 members, details
of shareholdings by members as well as changes to share structure)
it must notify ASIC of these changes (clauses 178A, 178B
and 178D),
-
- where a proprietary company changes its share structure,
details regarding this change of structure must be notified to ASIC
(clause 178C), and
-
- where details regarding a proprietary companies ultimate
holding company change, the proprietary company must notify ASIC of
these changes (clauses 349A-349D).
Items 25 28 insert notes at the
end of relevant sections in the Act, which alert the reader to the
fact that proprietary companies have these new additional reporting
requirements.
Section 188 of the Act places a duty upon the
company secretary (or where there is no company secretary, the
directors) to meet certain reporting requirements under the Act.
Item 23 of the Bill amends section 188 to extend
the secretary s duties to;
-
- respond to the extract of particulars,
-
- respond to the return of particulars,
-
- lodge financial reports
-
- notifying ASIC if there is;
-
- a change in the companies principal place of business,
-
- a change to the members register, if it is a proprietary
company,
-
- a change to the share structure, if it is a proprietary
company,
-
- a notice of an issue of shares,
-
- a change to the ultimate holding company, if it is a
proprietary company.
Part 1.5 of the Act is the Small Business Guide.
The guide summarises the main rules in the Act that apply to
proprietary companies limited by shares.
Item 11 Item 14 updates the
Small business guide so that it makes reference to the relevant
changes proposed by the Bill.
The Australian Business Number (ABN) has been
described as a single business identifier that allows businesses to
deal with the whole of government at one place and with one
identifier.(20)
Currently, companies and business entities that
carry on business in Australia need an ABN to register for the
goods and services tax and other elements of the New Tax
System.
When the ABN becomes widely used by Government,
businesses will be able to use one number to identify themselves in
their dealings with the Commonwealth Government.(21)
Company ABN s are based on Australian Company
Number (ACN) but have at least two additional digits.
The explanatory memorandum to the Bill states
that
It is proposed to make a number of minor
technical amendments that are intended to harmonise some lodgment
requirements of the Corporations Act with similar requirements in
the a New Tax System (Australian Business Register) Act 1999.
Schedule 2 of this bill
contains amendments relating to displaying ACN s, ARBN s
(Australian Registered Business Number) or ARSN s (Australian
Registered Scheme Number). Unless otherwise stated, references to
items in the following discussion will relate to items contained
within Schedule 2.
Currently there are a number of provisions in
the Act that require a company display its ACN, ARBN or ARSN. These
provisions have been amended so that a company may display its ABN
rather that its ACN, ARBN or ARSN if the last nine digits are the
same as the ACN, ARBN or ARSN. The relevant amendments are as
follows;
-
- Company with a common seal may display the ABN rather than the
ACN (item 4),
-
- Company may display its ABN rather that its ACN on all public
documents (item 6),
-
- Registered Australia bodies and registered foreign bodies may
set out their ABN rather than their ARBN (item 7),
and
-
- Managed investment schemes documents lodged with ASIC may set
out the schemes ABN s rather than the schemes ARSN. (item
9)
-
- Item 10 inserts a new provision which states
that where the ACN, ARBN or ARSN of a company, registered body or
registered scheme is required to be used under a Commonwealth law
administered by ASIC, the ABN may be used instead if the last nine
digits are the same as the last nine digits of the ACN, ARBN or
ARSN.
Lodgement of documents with ASIC in recent years
has become more streamlined as part of the Australian Government s
Online strategy. ASIC has a range of online services including
the;
-
- EDGE lodgement system that can be used by professional bodies
such as accountancy and legal practices to transmit electronic
copies of company documents (such as annual returns) directly to
ASIC s databases, and
-
- E-registers which is an interactive web-based service, designed
specifically for small business, that allows companies to update
their details (such as company annual returns) directly with
ASIC.
Document lodgement with ASIC is currently dealt
with in Part 2N.2 of the Act.
Schedule 3 of the Bill contains
a number of amendments to enhance the electronic lodgement of
documents with ASIC and unless otherwise stated, references to
items in the following discussion will relate to items contained
within Schedule 3.
Item 1 of the Bill renames the
Part to Chapter 2P Lodgments with ASIC.
Currently section 352 sets out the procedures
for the electronic lodgement of documents with ASIC. At present the
Act states that where a person lodges a document electronically,
the person is required to keep a copy of that document for 7
years.
Under the Bill, item 2 amends
the Act to enable ASIC to accept notification of changes to
particulars in the register that are lodged electronically without
the company or its appointed agent retaining a paper copy.
Item 3 amends the Act so that
ASIC is able to determine conditions for the lodgement of documents
required to be lodged under section 205G (director of listed
company required to notify market operator of shareholdings) and
section 792C (provision of information to ASIC about listed
disclosing entities).
Item 3 also includes
clause 354 which provides that ASIC may accept
telephone notice of changes to particulars, where the notice
relates to a misspelling or other minor typographical error or it
is included on a list published by ASIC on the internet.
Item 4 makes a consequential
amendment to section 1311 of the Act so that the renamed chapter is
still caught by the offence provisions.
Item 5 contains an amendment to
section 1364 of the Act to make provisions for the making of
regulations for the electronic lodgement of fees.
Schedule 4 of the Bill contains
amendments to extend the lodgement periods for notification of
information under the Act. The explanatory memorandum to the Bill
states that the amendments are
Intended to harmonise lodgment requirements
under the Corporations Act with similar requirements in the A
New Tax System (Australian Business Register) Act 1999.
(22)
Schedule 5 of the Bill contains
a number of miscellaneous amendments to the Corporations Act and
the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act
2001.
Item 1 amends the Act so that
ASIC is able to enter into contracts up to the value of $1 million
without seeking Ministerial approval.
Item 2 provides that the
Chairperson can nominate a person to attend meetings of the
Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee on his or her
behalf.
Item 3 deletes the term
prescribed interest (a term made obsolete when the Managed
Investment Act 1998 became operational) and replaces it with
the term that is now in use interest in a managed investment scheme
.
Item 4-6 corrects a number of
minor drafting errors in the Act.
Under section 201C of the Act, directors of
public companies and their subsidiaries may only hold office until
the next Annual General Meeting following the day they turn 72.
Persons over 72 may act as directors of public companies and their
subsidiaries only if they are appointed by special
resolution(23) at an Annual General Meeting of the
company, and the notice of the meeting states the person's age.
During the most recent election campaign, the
Prime Minister undertook to amend the Corporations Act by removing
the age restriction in s.201C for directors of public companies.
The Prime Minister described the provisions as 'an unwarranted
discrimination against older Australians'.(24)
In accordance with this policy commitment,
item 7 removes the upper age limit on election or
re-election of directors of a public company and their
subsidiaries.
Item 8 amends the Act to make
it clear that charges over uncertificated securities held by
companies [for example shares registered in the Clearing House
Electronic Subregister System (CHESS) and Bonds] are not subject to
the requirements of Chapter 2K.
The effect of this is to make it clear that a
company is not required to notify ASIC that a charge is held over
the uncertificated securities.
By removing the requirement to lodge an annual
return, the amendments contained within this Bill decrease the
annual document lodgement requirements under the Act. The Act is
however augmented with an arrangement that requires annual
verification of an extract of particulars which is produced by
ASIC. Companies and registered schemes may also be required to
respond to a return of particulars that may be issued by ASIC on an
ad hoc basis.
In addition to this the bill imposes increased
ongoing reporting requirements on companies to ensure that the
information that ASIC holds in relation to the company is
current.
Therefore, whilst the Act does to an extent
reduce the document lodgement requirements of companies and
registered schemes, the requirement to lodge an annual return is
replaced with other annual reporting requirements which will
continue to make reporting to ASIC under the Corporations Act a
matter that will consume company resources.
-
- Simplified Lodgement and Compliance: Streamlining paperwork
under the Corporations Law; Corporate Law Economic Reform Program,
Proposals for reform, Paper number 7 [http://www.treasury.gov.au/contentitem.asp?pageId=013&ContentID=287],
29 January 2003.
- Red Tape Cut for Small Business , Media Release, The Hon Joe
Hockey MP Minister for Financial Services and Regulation and The
Hon Ian MacFarlane MP Minister for Small Business, [http://www.minfsr.treasury.gov.au/content/pressreleases/2001/073.asp],
29 January 2003.
- This Bill contains the legislative provisions that are needed
to give effect to the CLERP 7 proposals. Some aspects of the CLERP
7 paper will be implemented by way of administrative change. Other
aspects of CLERP 7 will be implemented by way of regulations that
will be made under the Act.
- Government cuts red tape for small business , The Canberra
Times, September 25 2001.
- Red Tape Cut for Small Business , Media Release, The Hon Joe
Hockey MP Minister for Financial Services and Regulation and The
Hon Ian MacFarlane MP Minister for Small Business, [http://www.minfsr.treasury.gov.au/content/pressreleases/2001/073.asp],
29 January 2003.
- Explanatory Memorandum, Corporations Legislation Amendment
Bill 2002, p.1.
- Companies and Securities Advisory Committee, Report to the
Minister for Financial Services and Regulation on Charges over
uncertificated securities, April 2001
[http://www.camac.gov.au/camac/camac.nsf/byHeadline/PDFFinal+Reports+2001/$file/Charges_over_uncertified_securities,_April_2001.pdf],
29 January 2003.
- Section 347.
- Section 348.
- Corporations (Fees) Regulations 2001, Schedule 1, Item
7A.
- Corporations Act 2001, Schedule 3.
- HAJ Ford, RP Austin and IM Ramsay, Fords Principles of
Corporations Law, Butterworths Australia, 2000, p. 10,351.
- HAJ Ford, RP Austin and IM Ramsay, Fords Principles of
Corporations Law, Butterworths Australia, 2000, p. 10,351.
- Section 142.
- Section 146.
- Section 205B.
- Payment of a review fee is regarded as a tax [proposed clause 5
of the Corporations (Review Fees) Bill 2002] and hence a separate
bill is needed to ensure that there is compliance with section 55
of the Commonwealth Constitution.
- Section 292.
- financial report is defined in section 9 of the Act to mean an
annual financial report or a half-year financial report prepared
under Chapter 2M.
- Crowley, Melinda et al, Australian Master Tax Guide
2002, CCH Australia Limited, Sydney, 2002, p.10.
- Australian Securities and Investments Commission
,Australian Business Number,
[http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/ASIC_PUB.NSF/byid/CA256AF60076AF11CA256AF6007EECDE?opendocument].
29 January 2003.
- Explanatory Memorandum, Corporations Legislation
Amendment Bill 2002, p. 24 25.
- Special resolution is defined in section 9 of the Act as a
resolution that has been passed by at least 75% of the votes cast.
- Coalition rewards active seniors, Media Release, The Hon John
Howard, Prime Minister, [http://www.pm.gov.au/news/media_releases/2001/media_release1353.htm],
29 January 2003.
Susan Dudley
14 February 2003
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2003
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
2003.
Back to top