Bills Digest No. 85 2002-03
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2002 2003
WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Passage History
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2002
2003
Date Introduced:
11 December 2002
House: House of Representatives
Portfolio: Finance and
Administration
Commencement:
Royal
Assent
Purpose
To authorise the
Minister for Finance to issue $1 190 967 000 from the
Consolidated Revenue Fund (CRF) in addition to funds appropriated
by the Appropriation Act (No.1) 2002-03.
Annual authorisations for expenditure are
contained in:
-
- Appropriation Act (No.1), which authorises expenditure
for the ordinary annual services of government
-
- Appropriation Act (No.2), which authorises expenditure
on capital works and services, payments to the States and other
purposes not authorised by special legislation, and
-
- Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Act which
authorises expenditure for the five parliamentary departments.
However, if the initial appropriation is
insufficient for the financial year additional appropriations may
be sought. These additional appropriations, known as additional
estimates, are extra spending requirements - for example, for cost
overruns in existing programs or for new programs - not foreseen
when the Budget was presented.
From 1999-2000 the method of tabulating the
Budget and additional estimates has differed from previous
additional estimates in two main ways. First, the estimates
documentation is presented in an outcomes and outputs framework.
Previous estimates were based on a program approach. Second, the
estimates use an accrual budgeting framework. Prior to 1999-2000
budgets used a cash framework.
Accrual budgeting allows for the incorporation
of all assets, liabilities, expenses and revenues, including cash
receipts and expenditures. Under accrual budgeting, agencies are
funded for the full cost of their functions, including non-cash
costs such as employee entitlements such as long service leave or
depreciation. Thus the amount an agency is appropriated under
accrual budgeting in any one year may exceed its cash costs. Any
unspent amount is accumulated for use in future years when required
- for example accumulated depreciation to replace buildings and
equipment.
As noted in the Second Reading Speech to the
additional Appropriation Bills, there have also been savings in
various items from the Budget appropriations and this must be
considered when determining the total effect on government outlays
from the additional amounts appropriated. Savings from the initial
amount appropriated by Appropriation Acts Nos. 1 and 2 are
contained in the Department of Finance and Administration
Information Paper titled Statement of Savings Expected in
Annual Appropriations.
In relation to funding for the ordinary annual
services of government contained in Appropriation Act No. 1
2002-2003 (the Appropriation Act (No. 1)) and this Bill, the
Appropriation Act (No. 1) appropriated approximately $ 43 445 965
000 while this Bill appropriates an additional $1 190 967 000.
The Second Reading Speech to the Bill states that estimated savings
from the Appropriation Acts are $167 400 000.
As stated in the Schedule to the Bill, an
additional $406 357 000 is appropriated for the Foreign Affairs and
Trade portfolio. The Second Reading Speech explains that
$350 000 000 is for rephasing from 2001-2002 to 2002-2003
Australia s contribution to the 13th replenishment of
the International Development Association and Australia s
commitment to the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative . The
Schedule lists an additional $1 984 000 for the
Australian Secret Intelligence Service to enhance Government
understanding of the overseas environment affecting Australia s
vital interests and take appropriate action, consistent with
applicable legislation, to protect particular identified interests
.
As stated in the Schedule to the Bill, an
additional $245 892 000 is appropriated (against a 2002-2003 budget
appropriation of $450 388 000) for more sustainable, competitive
and profitable Australian agricultural, food, fisheries and
forestry industries . According to the Second Reading Speech, major
elements in this additional funding are:
-
- Additional drought measures ($178.6 million)
-
- Support for people on drought affected farms in a number of
regions in New South Wales and Queensland ($17.2 million)
-
- Donation to Farmhand drought appeal ($5 million), and
-
- Sugar Industry Reform measures including income support,
interest rate subsidies and assistance in diversification to other
agricultural commodities ($36.5 million).
As stated in the Schedule to the Bill, an
additional $108 065 000 is appropriated for the Defence portfolio.
According to the Second Reading Speech, $80.4 million of this
amount is for indexation adjustments .
As stated in the Schedule to the Bill, an
additional $94 690 000 is appropriated for the Health and Ageing
portfolio, including $53 108 000 for access through Medicare to
cost-effective medical services, medicines and acute health care
for all Australians .
As stated in the Second Reading Speech, other
additional appropriations include:
-
- $44.3 million for expected continued growth in New
Apprenticeships
-
- $19.2 million for support for victims of the Bali disaster and
their families
-
- $5.9 million for the administration of electoral and
ministerial offices
-
- $5.2 million to enhance the Budget advisory capacity in the
Department of Finance and Administration, and
-
- $4.6 million for the Australian Security Intelligence
Organisation.
The amount available for an agency's expenditure
on departmental(1) and administered items(2)
is specified in the Schedule to the Bill. The total amount
specified in the Schedule is $1 190 967 000
(clause 6).
Where an amount is specified in the Schedule for
an administered item, the Minister for Finance may issue the lesser
of the amount specified in the item and the amount determined by
the Minister as expenses incurred by the entity in relation to the
item in the year (clause 8). In relation to
departmental items, the Minister must issue the amount
specified:
-
- where an Act specifies that an entity must be paid amounts
appropriated for the purposes of the entity and this Bill specifies
an amount, or
-
- for certain payments of remuneration and allowances
(clause 7).
The Minister for Finance may increase the amount
in a departmental item/s by determination to a total maximum of $20
million (clause 10), while clause
11 provides that where there are unforeseen circumstances
and the need is urgent, the Minister for Finance may increase
expenditure by a total of $175 million. Parliament must be notified
of increased spending under clauses 10 and
11.
Clause 14 will formally
appropriate the funds for the Bill.
While the legal purpose of Appropriation Bills,
such as the Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2002-2003, is a self evident
fact, that is, to appropriate money from the Consolidated Revenue
Fund, it is not however always easy to ascertain from a reading of
such Bills what purpose/s and to which program/s within each
portfolio funds are to flow. For such detail the reader of the Bill
must resort to the Second Reading Speech to the Bill, the Portfolio
Additional Estimates Statements (PAES), and transcripts of Senate
estimate hearings.
PAES are intended to provide a means by which
the executive remains accountable to the Parliament and through the
Parliament to the Australian people.
PAES explain Appropriation Bills (Nos 3 & 4)
and Appropriations (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No 2) to
Senators and Members. There is a clause in the Appropriation Bills
(see clause 4 of the Appropriation Bill (No. 3)
2002-2003), which deems the PAES to be relevant documents that may
be considered when interpreting the items in the Appropriation
Acts.
All agencies that propose changes to their
outcomes since the Budget must report these changes in a PAES. The
reason for this is because appropriations made at Budget time are
linked legally to the agreed outcomes at that time, and changing
the outcomes will require changes to the Appropriation Bill (ie. a
legal action).
Department of Finance and Administration
guidelines for PAES specify that PAES should serve as an addendum
to Portfolio Budget Statements and should explain changes to Budget
estimates that are in the Additional Estimates Appropriation Bills.
In addition, PAES should provide sufficient information,
explanation and justification to enable Parliament, and through
Parliament the Australian public, to understand the purpose of each
item in the Bill(s). In effect, PAES should translate the
information in the Bills into the related outcomes and
outputs.(3)
Foreign Affairs and Trade (4)
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (5)
Defence(6)
Health
and Ageing(7)
Attorney-General s (8)
Communications, Information Technology and the
Arts(9)
Education, Science and
Training(10)
Employment and Workplace Relations(11)
Environment
and Heritage(12)
Family and Community Services(13)
Finance and Administration(14)
Immigration and
Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs(15)
Industry, Tourism and Resources(16)
Prime
Minister and Cabinet(17)
Transport
and Regional Services(18)
Treasury(19)
Veterans
Affairs(20)
-
-
The Department of Finance and Administration (DOFA) website
explains that departmental items are assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses which are controlled by the agency in providing its
outputs. Departmental items would generally include computers,
plant and equipment assets used by agencies in providing goods and
services and most employee expenses, supplier costs and other
administrative expenses incurred.
-
The DOFA website explains that administered items are expenses,
revenues, assets or liabilities managed by agencies on behalf of
the Commonwealth. Agencies do not control administered items.
Administered expenses include grants, subsidies and benefits. In
many cases, administered expenses fund the delivery of third party
outputs.
- Portfolio Additional Estimates Arrangements:
http://www.dofa.gov.au/budgetgroup/Other_Guidance_Notes/portfolio_additional_estimates.html.
-
http://www.dfat.gov.au/dept/budget/2002_2003_paes/2002-2003_PAES.pdf.
- See:
http://www.affa.gov.au/content/publications.cfm?Category=About%20AFFA&ObjectID=F8314640-88BC-4621-AA77ED0DED885A75.
- http://www.defence.gov.au/budget/02-03/index.html
- http://www.health.gov.au/pubs/budget2002/additional.htm
- See:
http://law.gov.au/www/agdhome.nsf/AllDocs/RWP7CE6C1FD0617F243CA256C9400155980?OpenDocument.
-
http://www.dcita.gov.au/Article/0,,0_1-2_1-3_143-4_112596,00.html.
- http://www.dest.gov.au/budget/PBS/paes.pdf.
- See:
http://www.dewr.gov.au/publications/budget/2002/portfolioAdditionalEstimatesStatements/default.asp.
- http://www.ea.gov.au/about/budget/2002/paes/index.html.
-
http://www.facs.gov.au/internet/facsinternet.nsf/aboutfacs/budget/budget2002-budget2002.htm.
- See:
http://www.finance.gov.au/Publications/PortfolioBudgetStatements/portfolio_additional_estimates2.html.
- http://www.immi.gov.au/budget/budget02.htm.
-
http://www.industry.gov.au/content/controlfiles/display_details.cfm?ObjectID=CBCE5515-1EA0-4635-B4740CAD42EFC377.
- http://www.dpmc.gov.au/docs/DisplayContents1.cfm?&ID=7.
- http://www.dotars.gov.au/dept/budget/paes/0203/index.htm.
- http://www.budget.gov.au/2002-03/paes/html/tsy_index.html.
- http://www.dva.gov.au/media/aboutus/budget/paes03/contents.htm.
Peter Prince
20 January 2003
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's
contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with
members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2003
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
2003.
Back to top