WARNING:
This Digest was prepared for debate. It reflects the legislation as
introduced and does not canvass subsequent amendments. This Digest
does not have any official legal status. Other sources should be
consulted to determine the subsequent official status of the
Bill.
CONTENTS
Passage History
Purpose
Background
Main Provisions
Concluding Comments
Endnotes
Contact Officer & Copyright Details
Defence Legislation Amendment (Flexible Career
Practices) Bill 2000
Date Introduced: 7 June 2000
House: House Of Representatives
Portfolio: Defence
Commencement: On a day to be fixed by
Proclamation, or at the latest six months after it receives Royal
Assent.
The purpose of the Bill is to amend the
legislative conditions governing the appointment and retention of
Army and Navy officers and enlisted members, by:
-
- extending the Limited Tenure Promotion scheme to ranks of
Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army or Commander in the Navy, or higher
ranks
-
- permitting Army and Navy officers and enlisted members to
voluntarily change their employment from open-ended to a fixed
term, and
-
- allowing the rejection of the resignation of an officer who has
not served a minimum period after appointment to that rank.
It is well-documented that it has proven
difficult for the Australian Defence Force to attract and retain
suitable personnel.(1) In 1998-1999 the personnel
separation rate(2) in the Australian Defence Force was
14%. While this is not a problem per se, it has the
potential to cause difficulties in certain significant positions. A
particular difficulty faced by Defence, which does not affect the
wider workforce, is the limitation on ability to recruit senior
personnel laterally. The Australian Defence Force has a tendency to
recruit junior people and train them extensively for a career of
military service.(3)
In 1995, Mr Graham Glenn, AO conducted a
comprehensive review of trends and factors which influence and
impact upon Defence personnel policies. The Defence Personnel
Policy Strategy Review (the Glenn Review(4)) made a
large number of recommendations relating to employment, work
practices, pay, entitlements, family support, training, education
and the Reserves. Several of these recommendations related to
'flexible work practices'(5), a fundamental change from
the notion of a lifetime military career.
The Glenn Review stated:
We favour greater choice, flexibility and
options ... We are proposing a fundamental shift away from
traditional (reactive) recruiting practices and from what for many
members is an undertaking of a lifetime career from the outset. In
this context, we favour a system of constant recruitment and what
we have called phased careers with Fixed Terms of Employment to
stabilise the recruitment of people and permit more effective
management and control of separations.(6)
In his second reading speech, the Minister for
Veterans' Affairs and Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence,
Mr Bruce Scott, MP, stated that, after consultation with personnel
across the Defence Force, and following the Glenn Review and the
1996 Defence Efficiency Review, the Australian Defence Force has
introduced 'numerous personnel policy changes ... - ranging from
job sharing and home based work to the employment of personnel on
fixed periods of service.'(7) The Bill seeks to
encourage fixed periods of service by permitting officers and
enlisted members of the Army and Navy to change their appointment
from permanent to a fixed term.
Apart from fixed terms of employment, another
key recommendation of the Glenn Review was the extension of Limited
Tenure Promotion to all ranks.(8) The Bill extends
Limited Tenure Promotion to the ranks of Lieutenant-Colonel in the
Army, Commander in the Navy or above. This is only an extension of
one rank in each of the Army and Navy. There are still 4 ranks of
officers in the Army and 5 ranks of naval officers for whom Limited
Tenure Promotion is not available.(9)
The Bill does not amend the appointment of Air
Force officers. Appointment and resignation of Air Force officers
is currently dealt with under the Air Force Regulations, not the
Air Force Act 1923, and the corresponding amendments for
Air Force officers will be made by regulations.(10)
Fixed-term and permanent
appointments
Section 10B of the Defence Act 1903
gives the Governor-General power to promote Army officers to the
rank of Colonel or higher for a fixed term. Item 1
amends subsection 10B(1) by making officers also eligible for fixed
term promotions to the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel. An identical
amendment is made by item 7 to section 13A of the
Naval Defence Act 1910, making Navy officers eligible for
fixed-term promotion to ranks of Commander or higher.
Officers of the Army and the Navy may be
appointed either for a fixed term(11) or on a permanent
basis.(12) An officer appointed for a fixed term may,
before that fixed term expires, volunteer for a further period of
service or for permanent appointment.(13) The Bill
provides flexibility for officers with permanent appointments to
volunteer to convert to an appointment for a fixed term
(items 2 and 7).
Enlisted soldiers in the Army and sailors in the
Navy(14) may also be appointed either for a fixed term
or until attaining retiring age.(15) A soldier or sailor
appointed for a fixed term may, before that term expires, volunteer
to extend the period of enlistment either for a further fixed term
or until attaining retiring age.(16) The Bill will
permit soldiers and sailors enlisted until retiring age to
volunteer to convert to enlistment for a fixed period
(items 6 and 12).
The amendments relating to appointments are not
expressly restricted to appointments made after the Bill
commences.
Resignation
Resignation of officers in the Army and Navy may
currently be rejected if:(17)
-
- the resignation was tendered in time of war or defence
emergency
-
- the resignation would seriously prejudice the ability to carry
out military operations
-
- a senior officer (in the Army, with a rank of Colonel or
higher, and in the Navy, with a rank of Captain or higher) has not
served for 12 months after being appointed to that rank
-
- an officer in the Reserves tenders his or her resignation
during a time requiring continuous full-time service by Reserves,
or
-
- an officer has not completed the required minimum period of
service after undertaking a course of training, a period of special
duties or service outside Australia, or after being transferred to
Australia. This period is known as the Return of Service Obligation
(ROSO).
ROSO is imposed on members of the Australian
Defence Force to ensure an adequate return for the extensive, and
often expensive, training members undergo.(18) The basic
formula for calculating ROSO is one year of service for each year
of training, plus an additional year.(19) So, for
example, an officer cadet who undertakes a three year degree course
at the Australian Defence Force Academy plus one year of officer
military training, has, on completion of the four years training,
an outstanding ROSO of five years (the four years of training plus
one year). An officer cadet who undertakes a four year degree (such
as a degree in engineering or an honours degree) at the Australian
Defence Force Academy plus one year of officer military training,
has a ROSO of six years (the five years of training plus one
year).(20) A Service Chief has the discretion to waive
ROSO or to accept financial payment in lieu of service of the
period of ROSO.(21) However, personnel have no right to
fulfil the obligation by financial payment in lieu of
ROSO.(22) As stated above, an officer's resignation may
be refused if the officer has not served the period of his or her
ROSO.
From 1 July 1998, the Australian Defence Force
introduced the concept of Fixed Periods of Service. All new
entrants to the Australian Defence Force from that date were
appointed or enlisted for an initial fixed term.(23) For
officers who enter the Australian Defence Force through the
Australian Defence Force Academy, the initial appointment is for a
period of nine years. Officers who do not complete training at the
Australian Defence Force Academy have an initial fixed period of
service of six years. Medical, dental or chaplaincy officers may be
appointed for terms other than the initial fixed
terms.(24) The initial fixed term is separate from ROSO,
although they are served concurrently. However, unlike ROSO, these
initial fixed terms are legislatively unenforceable. Officers
appointed for an initial fixed term may resign at any time
(although their resignation may be rejected if they have not
completed their ROSO).(25)
The Bill seeks to make initial fixed terms
enforceable. It adds a new category of resignations which may be
refused, where an officer has not completed the required minimum
period of service after his or her appointment as an officer
(items 3, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 11). The Chief of Army
(in the case of Army officers) and the Chief of Naval Staff (for
Navy officers) may determine what minimum period is required to be
served.
Neither the Explanatory Memorandum nor the
second reading speech provides any indication as to what the
initial minimum periods of service would be. A determination by the
Chief of Army or the Chief of Naval Staff is not a disallowable
instrument and thus is not subject to review by Parliament.
Officers ranked Colonel or higher in the Army,
or Captain or higher in the Navy would still be subject to the
existing requirement to serve 12 months after being appointed to
that rank before resigning. This is in addition to any ROSO they
may have, and to service of the initial fixed term proposed to be
introduced by the Bill.
The amendments relating to resignations only
apply to appointments made after the Bill commences (clause
4).
The amendments made by the Bill do not, on their
own, create a system of flexible Defence careers or implement the
recommendations made by the Glenn Review and the 1996 Defence
Efficiency Review. However, they do reduce the legislative barriers
to achieving this.
-
- See Australian National Audit Office Performance Audit,
Retention of Military Personnel: Department of Defence
(1999-2000), p. 14; David Anderson 'The Challenge of Military
Service: Defence Personnel Conditions in a Changing Social Context'
Information and Research Services Background Paper (10
November 1997).
- The terminology used by Defence to describe staff turnover.
- Australian National Audit Office Performance Audit,
Retention of Military Personnel: Department of Defence
(1999-2000), p. 14.
- Serving Australia - The Australian Defence Force in the
Twenty First Century (1995).
- Serving Australia - The Australian Defence Force in the
Twenty First Century (1995) at p. viii.
- Serving Australia - The Australian Defence Force in the
Twenty First Century (1995) at p. 77.
- Mr Scott, MP, Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Minister
Assisting the Minister for Defence, Speech on Second Reading of the
Defence Legislation Amendment (Flexible Career Practices) Bill
2000, House of Representatives Hansard, p. 16074, 7 June
2000. For a comprehensive review of conditions in the Australian
Defence Force generally, see David Anderson 'The Challenge of
Military Service: Defence Personnel Conditions in a Changing Social
Context' Information and Research Services Background
Paper (10 November 1997).
- Serving Australia - The Australian Defence Force in the
Twenty First Century (1995) at p. 286.
- These are Second Lieutenant, Lieutenant, Captain and Major in
the Army, and Midshipman, Acting Sub-Lieutenant, Sub-Lieutenant,
Lieutenant and Lieutenant-Commander in the Navy.
- Explanatory Memorandum to the Defence Legislation
Amendment (Flexible Career Practices) Bill 2000, p. i.
- Section 10A of the Defence Act 1903, section 9 of the
Naval Defence Act 1910.
- Section 10 of the Defence Act 1903, section 8 of the
Naval Defence Act 1910.
- Section 10C of the Defence Act 1903, section 11 of the
Naval Defence Act 1910.
- Soldiers and sailors are members of the Army and Navy
respectively who are not officers, subsection 4(1) of the
Defence Act 1903, section 3 of the Naval Defence Act
1910.
- Section 36 of the Defence Act 1903, section 25 of the
Naval Defence Act 1910.
- Section 37 of the Defence Act 1903, section 26 of the
Naval Defence Act 1910.
- Section 17 of the Defence Act 1903, section 13 of the
Naval Defence Act 1910.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-2 paragraph 3.a.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-2 paragraph 8,
Defence Instruction (Army) PERS 177-1 paragraph 15,
Defence Instruction (Navy) PERS 42-9 paragraph 15.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-2 paragraph 12,
Defence Instruction (Army) PERS 177-1 Annex A.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-2 paragraph 5,
Defence Instruction (Army) PERS 177-1 paragraph 42.
- Defence Instruction (Army) PERS 177-1 paragraph 41,
Defence Instruction (Navy) PERS 42-9, Annex A (Chief of
Navy Determination 4F) paragraph 9.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-3 paragraphs 1
and 8.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-3 paragraph 14.
- Defence Instruction (General) PERS 33-3 paragraph
18.
Katrine Del Villar
22 June 2000
Bills Digest Service
Information and Research Services
This paper has been prepared for general distribution to
Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care
is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the
paper is written using information publicly available at the time
of production. The views expressed are those of the author and
should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services
(IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in
this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for
related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional
legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an
official parliamentary or Australian government document.
IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with
Senators and Members
and their staff but not with members of the public.
ISSN 1328-8091
© Commonwealth of Australia 2000
Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the
Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including
information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior
written consent of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Members
of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official
duties.
Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library,
2000.
Back to top