Updated 12 September 2013
PDF version [321KB]
Leanne Manthorpe; updated by Cathy Madden and Deirdre McKeown
Politics and Public Administration Section, and Sue Johnson, Statistics and Mapping Section
Contents
Introduction
Constitutional and legislative basis for payment
Remuneration Tribunal
Parliamentary base salary—a brief history
1901–1973
Remuneration Tribunal
Reference Salary—under the PEO Classification
2011–present
Percentage increases in the base salary from 1996
Increases in the parliamentary base salary compared with average wages from 1968
Introduction
Senators and members receive an annual allowance by way of basic salary—$195,130 from 1 July 2013.[1] This background note explains the legislative basis, fixing and linking mechanisms for the allowance. Adjustments to the base salary since 1968 are provided in Table 1 and Graph 1.
Information on the base salary of state and territory members of parliament is available in a companion Research paper, Parliamentary remuneration and entitlements.
Section 48 of the Constitution provides for the payment of Members of Parliament:
Until the Parliament otherwise provides, each senator and each member of the House of Representatives shall receive an allowance of four hundred pounds a year, to be reckoned from the day on which he takes his seat.
Since 1901, the Parliament has enacted legislation to define the parliamentary base salary for the purposes of Section 48 of the Constitution.
The Remuneration and Allowances Act 1990 defines a parliamentary allowance which is consistent with the arrangements whereby the Remuneration Tribunal determines the remuneration of parliamentarians.[2] Section 8 provides that salaries and allowances are to be paid out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Section 8A of the Remuneration and Allowances Act 1990 allows the Governor-General to make regulations necessary to give effect to the Act. Remuneration and Allowances Regulations 2005 are now in force.
The Remuneration Tribunal is an independent statutory body established by the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973. This legislation allows the Tribunal to inquire into and determine allowances paid out of consolidated revenue to senators and members.[3] The Tribunal's Report 1999/01 states that 'the Government can choose to accept or reject the Tribunal's advice on these matters …'.[4] In 1974 Parliament disapproved the Tribunal's determination increasing the base salary to $20,000 per annum. In the decades since then Parliament has also modified determinations, postponed increases and enacted reduced allowances previously determined by the Tribunal as an example of wage restraint.[5]
The commencement of the Remuneration and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2011 restores the power of the Remuneration Tribunal to determine parliamentary remuneration. The legislation also removes the power of the Parliament to disallow parliamentary remuneration determinations made by the Tribunal.
At the Constitutional Convention at Sydney in 1891, Sir Samuel Griffith said:
One of the first things to be done by the parliament of the commonwealth in its first session would be to settle the salaries of ministers, and a great number of other matters of that kind. We have, therefore, given them power to deal with this subject. We did not think it necessary to make this in any sense a payment of members bill. We lay down, however, the principle that they, are to receive an annual allowance for their services, and we thought that it should start in the first instance at £500.[6]
At the Adelaide Convention, however, the draft constitution bill debated specified an amount of £400 and this was the annual allowance subsequently enacted in the Constitution.[7]
In 1907 parliamentarians made themselves liable to the payment of State income taxes.[8] Tax concessions for electorate expenses were allowed from 1925.[9]
Between 1901 and the establishment of the Remuneration Tribunal in 1973, Parliament adjusted allowances following decisions of executive government or as the result of recommendations from committees of inquiry.[10] In 1971 Justice Kerr noted that during this time there was 'no fixed pattern of approach' to the timing and method of reviewing base salaries—a process that invariably attracted criticism.[11] The Kerr Inquiry suggested the establishment of a 'Salaries Tribunal … authorised by legislation to review salaries and report at regular stated intervals.'
Kerr also wrote:
Nothing … should prevent the Parliament or the Government from rejecting recommendations or from taking action not in accordance with what is recommended.[12]
From its establishment in 1973, the Remuneration Tribunal, using a range of evidence and indicators, determined the base salary with reference to second division officers of the Commonwealth Public Service.[13] Adjustments were then made by applying National Wage Case decisions. In 1979 the Government legislated to remove the Tribunal's recent determination that these adjustments be automatic.[14]
In 1987 the Tribunal convened a conference for interested parties to examine parliamentarians' salaries.[15] An independent review was consequently conducted for the Tribunal in 1988. The resulting report recommended increases based on work value and community pay standards. The review strongly recommended that there be no linkage between the base salary and Australian Public Service (APS) salaries.[16] Increases determined by the Tribunal at that time were deferred.
With the Remuneration and Allowances Act 1990, the Government removed the Tribunal's power to determine base salaries and allowed a phased increase to the allowance over three years. The legislation also provided a link with Senior Executive Service (SES) Band 1 salaries in the APS—in contrast to the recommendation in the 1988 review. Adjustments to the base salary were made by means of national wage case decisions and, from 1992, agreements between the Government and public sector unions.
Legislation enacted in 1994 ensured that the base salary was equivalent to the minimum APS SES Band 2 salary level. The then Workplace Relations Act 1996 enabled SES salaries to be set through individual Australian Workplace Agreements (AWAs), thereby removing the standard against which the base salary was determined. With the expiry of the final APS Enterprise Agreement at the end of 1996, the mechanism by which adjustments were made to the base salary ceased.
Legislative changes to the APS in 1999, among other matters, amended the Remuneration and Allowances Act 1990 and the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
In Report 1999/01 the Tribunal recommended that the base salary be linked to a reference salary under the Principal Executive Office (PEO) Classification Structure.[17] The Government accepted this recommendation and introduced the Remuneration and Allowances Regulations 2005 to create the link. The Regulations provide for the reference salary to be 100 per cent of the rate determined by the Remuneration Tribunal for Band A of the PEO Classification.
The Remuneration Tribunal's amending Determination 2008/10 increased Reference Salary A in the PEO Classification by 4.3 per cent to $132,530 from 1 July 2008. Consequently, for the purposes of the base salary in 2008–09, the Remuneration and Allowances Regulations reduced Reference Salary A by 4.3 per cent.
On 26 May 2008, the Rudd Government introduced the Remuneration and Allowances Amendment Regulations 2008 (No. 1) amending the Remuneration and Allowances Regulations 2005 to freeze the base salary at $127,060 per annum. Rather than 100 per cent of Reference Salary A, Regulation 5 described the percentage as:
Regulation 5 Remuneration and allowances of Senators and Members of the House of Representatives
(2) For the financial year commencing on 1 July 2008, and for each subsequent financial year:
(a) the percentage is the percentage of the reference salary which, when applied to the reference salary, reduces the reference salary by the amount (in whole dollars) by which the reference salary was increased by the Remuneration Tribunal for the financial year commencing on 1 July 2008
For the purpose of calculating the base salary, Regulation 5 had the effect of reducing Reference Salary A in the PEO Classification by the percentage necessary to arrive at the rate payable at 30 June 2008, that is, $127,060.
On 20 June 2011 the Remuneration Tribunal released Determination 2011/11 Principal Executive Office (PEO) Classification Structure and Terms and Conditions which set Reference Salary A at $146, 380. On the basis described above, that is Reference Salary A less $5470, the parliamentary base salary increased to $140,910 with effect from 1 July 2011.
Under the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973, the Tribunal had wide scope to consider factors when reviewing the PEO Classification. The Tribunal indicated that these factors included: key economic indicators; other specific indicators such as the Wage Price Index; salary outcomes in the public (and to a lesser degree) private sector; the principles of wage determination and decisions of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission.[18]
In 2009 an Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) report, Administration of parliamentarians’ entitlements by the Department of Finance and Deregulation, highlighted shortcomings in the management of MPs’ entitlements.[19] In September 2009, in response to the ANAO report, the Government set up a committee to review parliamentary entitlements, chaired by former senior public servant, Barbara Belcher.
In 2011 the Government accepted the recommendation of the Report of the committee for the review of parliamentary entitlements to restore the power of the Remuneration Tribunal to determine parliamentary base salary.[20] The legislation, the Remuneration and other Legislation Amendment Bill 2011, also removed the power of the Parliament to disallow parliamentary remuneration determinations made by the Tribunal. The Bill passed both Houses on 23 June 2011 and received assent on 25 July 2011, commencing on 8 August 2011.
On 15 December 2011 the Remuneration Tribunal issued its initial report on the work value assessment of parliamentary remuneration.[21] The Tribunal also issued a Statement outlining its recommendations and next steps.[22] The main recommendations included:
on the basis of a work assessment of parliamentarians, that parliamentary base salary should be set at $185,000
On 13 March 2012 the Tribunal issued the first Determination setting the base salary of $185,000 for Members of Parliament to take effect from 15 March 2012.[23]
On 19 June 2012 the Tribunal issued Determination 2012/15: Members of Parliament – Base salary, entitlements and related matters which increased MPs’ base salary by 3 per cent to $190,550 from 1 July 2012.[24]
On 18 June 2013, the Tribunal issued Determination 2013/13: Members of Parliament – Base salary, additional salary for Parliamentary office holders and related matters which increased the base salary by 2.4 per cent to $195,130 from 1 July 2013.[25]
Since 1996, the base salary has increased by the following (in actual dollars):
- 7 March 1996—1.6 per cent
- 17 October 1996—1.2 per cent
- 7 December 1999—4.45 per cent, the first stage of a 9.95 per cent two-stage increase
- 1 July 2000—5.5 per cent, the second stage of the 9.95 per cent increase
- 1 July 2000—2.2 per cent by virtue of an adjustment to the PEO Classification Structure
- 1 July 2001—3.9 per cent
- 1 July 2002—3.35 per cent
- 1 July 2003—4 per cent
- 1 July 2004—3.9 per cent
- 1 July 2005—4.1 per cent and
- 1 July 2006—7.01 per cent
- 1 July 2007—6.8 per cent
- 1 October 2009—3.1 per cent
- 1 August 2010—3.8 per cent
- 1 July 2011—3.6 per cent
- 15 March 2012—31.3 per cent
- 1 July 2012—3.0 per cent
- 1 July 2013—2.4 per cent
During the 1980s the MPs’ base salary failed to keep up with inflation resulting in a decline in value in real terms. This was in contrast to the average which kept ahead of inflation and grew, in real terms, at an annual average rate of 0.3 per cent.
As a result the base salary, which had been three times the average wage in 1975, was only twice the average wage in 1991. During the 1990s MPs were given increases to their base salary which allowed some catch up with average wages. However, despite this by 2011 the base salary was still only 2.2 times the average wage.
In March 2012 MPs received an increase to their base salary of 31.3 per cent. This resulted in a significant increase in the value of the salary relative to average wages. At 2.8 times the average annual wage it is at its highest level in 37 years.
Table 1: Base salary compared with average wages 1968–2013
|
|
Base salary
($ per annum)
|
Male total average wages
($ per annum) (b)
|
Ratio allowance to average wages
|
Year
|
Date of effect
|
Current
prices
|
Real prices
(2012 dollars) (a)
|
Current
prices
|
Real prices
(2011 dollars) (a)
|
1968
|
1.12.68
|
9 500
|
103 241
|
3 525
|
37 858
|
2.7
|
1973
|
1.4.73
|
14 500
|
123 387
|
5 256
|
44 203
|
2.8
|
1975
|
1.3.1975
|
20 000
|
131 679
|
6 987
|
45 465
|
2.9
|
1975
|
15.5.1975
|
20 720
|
131 616
|
7 597
|
47 694
|
2.7
|
1975
|
9.9.1975
|
20 000
|
126 154
|
7 659
|
47 751
|
2.6
|
1976
|
1.6.1976
|
21 250
|
120 550
|
8 739
|
48 997
|
2.4
|
1977
|
1.6.1977
|
24 369
|
121 777
|
9 656
|
47 693
|
2.5
|
1978
|
1.7.1978
|
25 692
|
116 747
|
10 637
|
47 771
|
2.4
|
1979
|
1.7.1979
|
26 720
|
111 067
|
11 606
|
47 682
|
2.3
|
1979
|
23.11.1979
|
27 575
|
111 287
|
12 091
|
48 230
|
2.3
|
1980
|
1.7.1980
|
28 816
|
108 753
|
13 139
|
49 011
|
2.2
|
1980
|
1.8.1980
|
30 026
|
113 320
|
13 139
|
49 011
|
2.3
|
1981
|
1.7.1981
|
36 000
|
124 653
|
14 771
|
50 551
|
2.4
|
1981
|
1.7.1981
|
33 013
|
114 310
|
14 771
|
50 551
|
2.2
|
1982
|
1.7.1982
|
36 000
|
110 826
|
17 201
|
52 337
|
2.1
|
1982
|
1 10 1982
|
38 500
|
115 181
|
17 602
|
52 048
|
2.2
|
1983
|
6.10.1983
|
40 156
|
110 598
|
18 875
|
51 379
|
2.1
|
1984
|
1.5.1984
|
41 802
|
115 307
|
20 011
|
54 557
|
2.1
|
1985
|
1.7.1985
|
42 889
|
108 516
|
21 018
|
52 559
|
2.0
|
1986
|
1.7.1986
|
45 543
|
105 876
|
22 796
|
52 377
|
2.0
|
1986
|
10.3.1987
|
46 065
|
102 090
|
23 176
|
50 766
|
2.0
|
1987
|
1.7.1987
|
47 815
|
102 688
|
23 828
|
50 578
|
2.0
|
1988
|
1.7.1988
|
49 180
|
98 360
|
25 350
|
50 111
|
1.9
|
1989
|
1.1.1989
|
55 000
|
106 803
|
27 483
|
52 747
|
2.0
|
1990
|
16.11.1989
|
55 000
|
100 020
|
28 156
|
50 606
|
2.0
|
1990
|
1.7.1990
|
58 300
|
101 813
|
29 339
|
50 641
|
2.0
|
1991
|
1.1.1991
|
61 798
|
105 372
|
30 533
|
51 456
|
2.0
|
1991
|
1.7.1991
|
64 768
|
109 607
|
30 001
|
50 181
|
2.2
|
1991
|
15.8.1991
|
66 387
|
112 347
|
30 001
|
50 181
|
2.2
|
1992
|
17.12.1992
|
67 715
|
113 214
|
31 258
|
51 652
|
2.2
|
1993
|
11.3.1993
|
68 663
|
113 745
|
31 868
|
52 177
|
2.2
|
1994
|
1.1.1994
|
68 663
|
112 199
|
32 619
|
52 681
|
2.1
|
1994
|
10.3.1994
|
69 693
|
113 882
|
32 619
|
52 681
|
2.1
|
1994
|
15.12.1994
|
74 460
|
119 083
|
33 620
|
53 142
|
2.2
|
1995
|
12.1.1995
|
75 949
|
119 452
|
33 990
|
52 837
|
2.2
|
1995
|
6.4.1995
|
77 438
|
120 222
|
34 115
|
52 347
|
2.3
|
1995
|
13.7.1995
|
78 987
|
121 167
|
34 240
|
51 914
|
2.3
|
1996
|
7.3.1996
|
80 251
|
121 658
|
34 949
|
52 365
|
2.3
|
1996
|
17.10.1996
|
81 856
|
122 750
|
35 507
|
52 626
|
2.3
|
1999
|
7.12.1999
|
85 500
|
124 288
|
38 657
|
55 540
|
2.2
|
2000
|
1.7.2000
|
92 000
|
126 790
|
40 085
|
54 600
|
2.3
|
2001
|
1.7.2001
|
95 600
|
128 511
|
41 681
|
55 378
|
2.3
|
2002
|
1.7.2002
|
98 800
|
128 690
|
43 386
|
55 853
|
2.3
|
2003
|
1.7.2003
|
102 760
|
130 457
|
45 753
|
57 408
|
2.2
|
2004
|
1.7.2004
|
106 770
|
132 471
|
47 041
|
57 685
|
2.3
|
2005
|
1.7.2005
|
111 150
|
133 855
|
49 950
|
59 453
|
2.2
|
2006
|
1.7.2006
|
118 950
|
137 820
|
51 916
|
59 451
|
2.3
|
2007
|
1.7.2007
|
127 060
|
144 525
|
54 778
|
61 582
|
2.3
|
2008
|
1.7.2008
|
127 060
|
137 667
|
56 880
|
60 911
|
2.2
|
2009
|
1.10.2009
|
131 040
|
139 467
|
60 623
|
63 771
|
2.2
|
2010
|
1.8.2010
|
136 040
|
141 613
|
61 702
|
63 483
|
2.2
|
2011
|
1.7.2011
|
140 910
|
142 570
|
64 471
|
64 471
|
2.2
|
2012
|
15.3.2012
|
185 000
|
185 928
|
66 995
|
66 547
|
2.8
|
2012
|
1.7.2012
|
190 550
|
190 550
|
67 000
|
68 601
|
2.8
|
2013
|
1.7.2013
|
195130
|
195 130
|
70 754
|
70 754
|
2.8
|
Annual average percentage change
|
|
|
|
|
|
1968 to 2013
|
1.1
|
1.0
|
1.1
|
1.0
|
|
1970 to 1980
|
11.7
|
0.5
|
14.1
|
2.6
|
|
1980 to 1990
|
6.7
|
-0.8
|
7.9
|
0.3
|
|
1990 to 2000
|
5.3
|
2.4
|
3.6
|
0.8
|
|
2000 to 2010
|
4.0
|
1.1
|
4.4
|
1.5
|
|
2011 to 2013 (c)
|
38.5
|
33.6
|
9.7
|
5.9
|
|
(a) adjusted for inflation with the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to June 2013 prices
(b) average weekly wages annualised
(c) wages growth to May 2013 and MPs’ base salary to 1 July 2013
Sources:
Data on MP's allowance from Commonwealth Acts and Remuneration Tribunal Reports and Determinations.
Average wages and deflators from ABS, Consumer price index, Australia, Jun 2013, cat. no. 6401.0. Average weekly earnings, Australia, May 2013, cat. no. 6302.0.
Real values calculated by the Parliamentary Library
Graph 1: Base salary for members of parliament and average weekly wages index—real terms
Graph 1 provides data until July 2013 figure, but the axis labels are set to show every two years from Dec 1968.
Table 1, Graph 1 and commentary on the comparison of MPs’ base salary and real wages by Sue Johnson, Statistics and Mapping Section.
[1]. The choice of phrase to describe the allowance payable under Section 48 of the Constitution is a difficult one. 'Basic salary' is commonly used in an informal sense and serves to distinguish it from salaries paid to ministers and office-holders. The authors have chosen to use ‘parliamentary base salary’. Federal parliamentarians are also entitled to other benefits and allowances described in legislation. See C Madden and D McKeown, Parliamentary remuneration and entitlements, Research paper, Parliamentary Library, 2013.
[3]. Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973, subsection 7(1).
[5]. Remuneration Tribunal 1982 Review, pp. 18–21 and Report 1999/01, op. cit., pp. 1–5.
[6]. S Griffith, Official Report of the National Australasian Convention Debates, Sydney, 2 April 1891, p. 654.
[7]. Official Report of the National Australasian Convention Debates, First Session, Adelaide, 22nd March to 23rd April 1897, pp. 1032–34.
[9]. E Page, House of Representatives, Debates, 4 June 1947, p. 3355. An Electorate Expense Allowance, not subject to income taxation, was paid from 1952.
[10]. Including—Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Salaries and Allowances of Members of the National Parliament (Nicholas Report), 1952; Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Salaries and Allowances of Members of the Commonwealth Parliament (Richardson Report), 1955; Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Salaries and Allowances of Members of the Commonwealth Parliament (Richardson Report), 1959; Salaries and Allowances of Members of the Parliament of the Commonwealth: A Report of Inquiry by Mr Justice Kerr, (Kerr Report), 1971.
[11]. Mr Justice Kerr, ibid., p. 12.
[13]. With the enactment of the Public Service Reform Act 1984, the Second Division of the Commonwealth Public Service was replaced by the SES. See Public Service Reform Bill 1984, Bills Digest, no. 72, 1984, p. 2.
[15]. Remuneration Tribunal, 1987 Review, pp. 5–12.
[16]. Cullen Egan Dell, Report on the pay and allowances for members of parliament: prepared for the Remuneration Tribunal, 1988, pp. 18–19.
[17]. The PEO classification structure provides a framework for the negotiation of the terms and conditions of PEO employment.
For copyright reasons some linked items are only available to members of Parliament.
© Commonwealth of Australia
In essence, you are free to copy and communicate this work in its current form for all non-commercial purposes, as long as you attribute the work to the author and abide by the other licence terms. The work cannot be adapted or modified in any way. Content from this publication should be attributed in the following way: Author(s), Title of publication, Series Name and No, Publisher, Date.
To the extent that copyright subsists in third party quotes it remains with the original owner and permission may be required to reuse the material.
Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the publication are welcome to webmanager@aph.gov.au.
This work has been prepared to support the work of the Australian Parliament using information available at the time of production. The views expressed do not reflect an official position of the Parliamentary Library, nor do they constitute professional legal opinion.
Feedback is welcome and may be provided to: web.library@aph.gov.au. Any concerns or complaints should be directed to the Parliamentary Librarian. Parliamentary Library staff are available to discuss the contents of publications with Senators and Members and their staff. To access this service, clients may contact the author or the Library‘s Central Entry Point for referral.