The Coalition’s PPL scheme: budget drain or revenue raiser?

Parliament house flag post

The Coalition’s PPL scheme: budget drain or revenue raiser?

Posted 29/04/2014 by Luke Buckmaster

One of the most controversial features of the Coalition Government’s proposed Paid Parental Leave (PPL) scheme is its significantly greater cost compared with the current scheme. The more generous proposed scheme is expected to cost $5.7 billion per year when up and running in 2016-17, while the current scheme will cost $2 billion in that year. Media reports suggest that this has led some Coalition members of parliament to urge the Prime Minister to either abandon or ‘scale down’ his proposed scheme.

However, it is important to note that according to the Coalition’s 2013 election costings the scheme is expected to make money by its second year—that is, it will raise revenue of $1.7 billion in 2016-17. 

As can be seen from the table below (adapted from the costing document), the Coalition indicated that in 2016-17 the cost of its scheme would be more than offset by the following:

  • $2.0 billion from the existing PPL scheme, which would no longer have to be paid
  • $557.0 million from Commonwealth, state and territory government PPL schemes, which would no longer be paid
  • $665.0 million from ‘automatic adjustments to government spending and revenue’ (for example, taxes collected on the new higher PPL scheme payments; reduced cost of Family Tax Benefit with fewer families eligible due to receipt of higher PPL payments) and
  • $3.8 billion from a levy of 1.5% on companies with more than $5 million in taxable income.

Budget impact of the Coalition’s Paid Parental Leave Scheme Package

 

2014-15

$m

2015-16

$m

2016-17

$m

Total

$m

Gross cost of the Coalition PPL

 

-10

-4,108

-5,684

-9,802

Less

Existing government scheme

 

-

1,653

2,012

3,665

Existing Commonwealth and state public sector schemes

 

-

557

672

1,229

Automatic adjustments to government spending and revenue

 

-

665

946

1,611

Remaining Cost

-10

 

-1,233

-2,054

-3,297

Levy of 1.5% on company taxable income above $5 million

300

300

3,800

4,400

Net Budget impact – Coalition’s Paid Parental Leave Scheme Package

290

-933

1,746

1,103

Source: Fiscal budget impact of Federal Coalition policies, September 2013

Thus while it often appears from media reports that abandoning (or substantially reducing the generosity of) the Coalition’s PPL proposal could save billions of dollars, the Coalition’s costings suggest that this is unlikely to be the case.

If the Government were to abandon its proposed PPL scheme, it would continue to bear the $2 billion annual cost for the existing PPL scheme and it would not achieve the $1.5 billion in offsets from existing public sector employer schemes and other adjustments to spending and revenue. The value of these offsets would also be reduced if the Government were to reduce the generosity of its proposed scheme rather than abandon it altogether. If the proposed scheme is not implemented, it is unlikely the Government will implement the 1.5% business levy, given it is specifically intended to help pay for its PPL scheme.

As it stands, it is difficult to see the Government abandoning a policy that will actually produce budget savings.

Comments

  • 8/05/2014 11:18 AM
    Anonymous said:

    You say that the value of the offsets would be reduced if the Government were to reduce the generosityy of its proposed scheme. Is that the case now, given that the amount does seem to have been reduced to $100k? Would the Government still make money from the policy in the second year?

  • 15/05/2014 11:35 AM
    Luke Buckmaster said:

    Hi Anonymous, It would seem logical that the value of offsets will now be reduced but we don't have access to the information that would show us by how much.


Thank you for your comment. If it does not require moderation, it will appear shortly.

Add your comment

[Click to expand]

We welcome your comments, or additional information which is relevant to a post. These can be added by clicking on the ‘Add your comment’ option above. Please note that the Parliamentary Library will moderate comments, and reserves the right not to publish comments that are inconsistent with the objectives of FlagPost. This includes comments that are not relevant to the article, factually incorrect or politically partisan, as well as spam, profanity and personal abuse. We will close comments after three months.




Captcha
Generate a new image
Type characters from the image:

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter Add | Email Print

FlagPost

Flagpost is a blog on current issues of interest to members of the Australian Parliament


Parliamentary Library Logo showing Information Analysis & Advice

Archive

Syndication

Tagcloud

refugees asylum immigration climate change Australian foreign policy parliament social security elections welfare reform welfare policy school education Australian Defence Force health financing higher education emissions trading indigenous Australians women private health insurance people trafficking Employment illicit drugs gambling health reform federal election 2010 Middle East disability Sport Australian Bureau of Statistics statistics United Nations Asia Afghanistan income management Medicare health forced labour Taxation Australian Sports Anti-Doping Agency World Anti-Doping Agency United States federal budget Industrial Relations Carbon Pricing Mechanism politics dental health Australian Electoral Commission WADA criminal law transport aid child protection environment poker machines Australia in the Asian Century steroids National Disability Insurance Scheme detention aged care 43rd Parliament slavery health system ASADA Law Enforcement Australian Federal Police Fair Work Act Australian Public Service governance labour force people smuggling debt international relations constitution New Zealand food Australian Crime Commission pharmaceutical benefits scheme OECD corruption pensions public service reform children's health Aviation federal election 2013 foreign debt gross debt net debt defence capability parliamentary procedure Senate Senators and Members ALP Newstart Parenting Payment multiculturalism Youth Allowance sea farers UK Parliament election results voting mental health Federal Court terrorist groups science social media Higher Education Loan Program HECS federal state relations accountability Papua New Guinea youth paid parental leave same sex relationships coal seam gas customs planning doping crime health risks International Women's Day Gonski Review of Funding for Schooling sex slavery Special Rapporteur Northern Territory Emergency Response social policy violence against women domestic violence China ADRV terrorism transparency research and development welfare ASIO intelligence community Australian Security Intelligence Organisation carbon tax mining High Court military history electoral reform employer employee renewable energy regional unemployment fishing by-election European Union family assistance skilled migration banking United Nations Security Council Australian economy forestry food labelling vocational education and training Drugs welfare systems Indonesia children Constitutional reform local government codes of conduct terrorist financing homelessness Parliamentary remuneration money laundering Trafficking in Persons Report energy social inclusion human rights paternalism national security fuel disability employment Tasmania integrity standards NATO Australian Secret Intelligence Service sexual abuse World Trade Organization Australia public health housing affordability bulk billing political parties water productivity health policy Governor-General US economy trade unions export liquefied natural gas foreign bribery firearms question time speaker superannuation public housing expertise public policy climate Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change leadership Department of Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry regulation Pacific Islands reserved seats new psychoactive substances synthetic drugs UNODC carbon markets animal health middle class welfare Census Indigenous constitutional recognition of local government referendum consumer laws PISA competition policy royal commission US politics language education baby bonus Leaders of the Opposition citizen engagement policymaking Australia Greens servitude Trafficking Protocol forced marriage Population rural and regional alcohol entitlements ministries Hung Parliament social citizenship maritime Iran ANZUS regional students school chaplains federal budget 2011-12 salary Medicare Locals primary care Building the Education Revolution EU China soft power education Fiji India Disability Support Pension Antarctica Diplomacy by-elections state and territories Bills anti-corruption fraud bribery corporate ownership whistleblower G20 economic reform innovation Members of Parliament Scottish referendum early childhood education Middle East; national security; terrorism social services Criminal Code Amendment (Misrepresentation of Age to a Minor) Bill 2013 online grooming sexual assault of minors ACT Assembly smoking plain packaging tobacco cigarettes Asia; Japan; international relations Work Health and Safety Migration; asylum seekers; regional processing China; United States; international relations fiscal policy Racial Discrimination Act; social policy; human rights; indigenous Australians Foreign policy Southeast Asia Israel Palestine asylum refugees immigration political finance donations foreign aid Economics efficiency human rights; Racial Discrimination Act employment law bullying asylum seekers Animal law; food copyright Australian Law Reform Commission industry peace keeping contracts workplace policies same-sex marriage disorderly conduct retirement Parliament House standing orders prime ministers election timetable sitting days First speech defence budget submarines workers financial sector Canada Somalia United Kingdom GDP world heritage political engagement leave loading Trade; tariffs; safeguards; Anti-dumping public interest disclosure whistleblowing Productivity Commission limitation period universities Ireland cancer gene patents genetic testing suspension of standing and sessional orders live exports infant mortality honorary citizen railways disciplinary tribunals standard of proof World Health Organisation arts international students skilled graduate visas temporary employment visas apologies roads Italy national heritage NHMRC nutrition anti-dumping Rent Assistance obesity evidence law sacrament of confession US presidential election international days DFAT UN General Assembly deregulation Regulation Impact Statements administrative law small business Breaker Morant regional engagement social determinants of health abortion Members suspension workplace health and safety marine reserves hearing TAFE Victoria astronomy resources sector YMCA youth parliament Korea rebate Australian Greens presidential nomination Racial Discrimination Act political parties preselection solar hot water Financial Action Taskforce Horn of Africa peacekeeping piracy Great Barrier Reef Stronger futures political financing political education Social Inclusion Board early childhood National Quality Framework for Early Childhood Education and Care Murray-Darling Basin sanctions Norway hospitals republic President Barack Obama Presidential visits qantas counselling Korean peninsula Work Choices biosecurity hendra environmental law federalism federation preselection therapeutic goods Therapeutic Goods Administration plebiscites computer games pests suicide nuclear COAG Ministerial Councils floods ADHD stimulant medication advertising electricity extradition conscience votes poverty preventative health rural health coastal erosion Parliamentary Budget Office work-life balance

Show all
Show less
Back to top